* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Bio Grant draft
Eradication of infectious diseases wikipedia , lookup
Chagas disease wikipedia , lookup
Brucellosis wikipedia , lookup
Schistosomiasis wikipedia , lookup
Sarcocystis wikipedia , lookup
Coccidioidomycosis wikipedia , lookup
Onchocerciasis wikipedia , lookup
Leptospirosis wikipedia , lookup
Visceral leishmaniasis wikipedia , lookup
Leishmaniasis wikipedia , lookup
Hartwell Period 8 Nathan Strauss 5/3/08 Biology Grant Proposal (draft) Background InformationChytridiomycosis is an infectious disease that is threatening worldwide amphibian populations. It is already thought to have impacted 30% of amphibian species across the globe. In the past 15 years this disease has been the major cause of mass die-offs and extinctions of frog species. The disease is caused by Chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis), which is found on every continent that is inhabited by amphibians, especially on the Americas and in Australia and parts of Africa. It has been identified as the cause of sporadic death in some amphibian populations and a 100% mortality rate in others. This is surprising, as the fungi were long thought to be free-living saprophytes with only several species being able to infect some vascular plants and invertebrates. Chytrid fungus invades the top layers of a frog’s skin and damages the keratin layer (part of the epidermis) (1,2). The surface of the epithelium (outer layer of skin) of an infected frog showing spore discharge tubes emerging along the surface (1). Though it is not known how the disease actually causes death, it is thought that because frogs perform respiration through their skin, the fungus directly affects water in take and breathing. It is also thought that the fungus may release toxins that the skin then absorbs as part of its natural function. Once the fungus is contracted, there is no known treatment for the disease (2). My hypothesis is to find out whether or not this disease is capable of infecting newts and salamander species. Though the disease has only been shown to infect frog species, it can be predicted that it may begin to effect newts and salamanders, as both amphibians share the same habitat, breeding grounds, and overall biological anatomy. Also, like frogs most salamander species perform respiration through their skin-the same problem that the disease poses to frogs. Hypothesis and PredictionMy hypothesis is that Chtyrid fungus is capable of infecting Caudates and causing Chytridiomycosis. My prediction is that by periodically testing newt and salamander species for Chytrid fungus in select areas where the known carriers are common and outbreaks of the disease have occurred, over a period time symptoms of the disease should begin to show up in not only Anurans, but in some Caudata species as well. Justification of the ResearchThis research is incredibly important. With the way Chytrid is spreading, its rate of progression has been calculated at 28-100Km per year (1). It already has affected 30% of the world’s amphibian species, mostly frogs. It is only a matter of time before it spreads to other groups of amphibians, such as newts and salamanders. The disease has already made some species extinct in the wild. Even more disturbing is the fact that this fungal infection, that previously only infected select plants and invertebrates, now affects vertebrates. If it were ever to affect humans, the results would be devastating. By studying whether or not Caudates can become infected, it may shed new light on how the disease spreads, mutates, and how it causes death. It may also explain why some species of amphibians are carriers and have become resistant, while others die-off quickly. This would greatly further Scientist’s abilities to perfect an anti-fungal treatment for the disease. Also, by practicing different testing methods, it could help scientists determine a more efficient way of detecting Chytridiomycosis. By performing this research it may explain why Caudates have not been severely impacted or even provide a way to prevent the disease from ever spreading to Caudata populations in mass, the way it has for Anurans. Methods and MaterialsN/A as more research is required before an efficient experiment can be decided upon; however, testing wild populations and gathering data will probably play a role. References: 1.Brem, Forrest, Joseph R. Mendelson III, and Karen R, Lips. “ Chytrid Fungus and Chytridiomycosis.” Thursday 24/April/2008. Amphibian Ark. 3/May/2008 <http://www.amphibianark.org/chytrid.htm> 2.“Chytridiomycosis (Amphibian Chytrid Disease).” Monday 24/Sep/2007. Australian department of the Environment, water, Heritage, and the Arts. 3/May/2008 <http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/invasive/publication s/c-disease/index.html> 3.“Origin of the Amphibian Chytrid Fungus.” 22/Nov/2004. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2/May/2008 <http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol10no12/03-0804.htm> Budget SectionN/A as the experiment has not been decided on, no price can be placed on any needed funding or equipment.