* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 5.04, Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II Lecture 16
Marcus theory wikipedia , lookup
Hartree–Fock method wikipedia , lookup
Rutherford backscattering spectrometry wikipedia , lookup
Coupled cluster wikipedia , lookup
Heat transfer physics wikipedia , lookup
Franck–Condon principle wikipedia , lookup
Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup
Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup
5.04, Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II MIT Department of Chemistry Lecture 16: Angular Overlap Method (AOM) and M-L Diatomics We will begin by “solving” the Hamiltonean by a simple method, afforded by the Wolfsberg-Hemholtz approximation from Wolfsberg-Hemholtz approx E+ E+ EM EM (H + ML EMSML 2 ) EML M 2 EML EL L 2 2 2 E S = L ML = SML EML E 2 2 E S x = L ML = SML EML b E EL (H + ML EL SML 2 ) EML E+ and E- are roots of secular determinant describing the LCAO wave function, = CMM + CLL Thus by determining the overlap integral, SML, the relative energies of the metal and ligand based orbitals may be obtained… it is this energy difference that is measured by electronic spectroscopy. 5.04, Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II Lecture 16 Page 1 of 3 Recall that the overall wave function is a product of radial and angular functions n,,m = R n, (r) Y,m (, ) radial angular 1 2 3 2z n 1 / 2 2+1 • L n+ () • R n, (r) = e 3 na 0 2n n ! ( ) [( ) ] where = 2z r na0 Laguerre polynomial 1 d m 1 im 2 + 1 + m ! 1 2 Y,m (, ) = 1 • • • sin • e m m 2 m ! 2 ! sin d cos 2 ,m () m () ( ( ( ) ) ) ( ) In the AOM Method, the overlap integral is also factored into a radial and angular product… SML = S(r) F(,) S(r) F(,) M l L cos l L 2 L 3cos -1 l e-r M L 54.73˚ r 0 90 cos sin l L Under the condition of a fixed M-L distance, the overlap integral, SML, will depend only on F(,) 0 5.04, Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II 45 45 0 90 Lecture 16 Page 2 of 3 90 To begin, let’s determine the energy of the d-orbitals for a M-L diatomic. There are three types of interactions z z z y y x x y 2 x y x 2 y y x 2 ( ) ( ) x () ( ) ( 2 ) () E dz2 = SML = • F , = •1 = e E dyz = E dxz = SML = e E dxy = E dx2 y2 = SML = e the metal orbital bears the antibonding interaction… hence dz2 is the (M-L)* interaction above is for L ligands…etc metal orbitals are destablized by e. For acceptors, the metal will be stabilized by e. SML() is small compared to SML() or SML(). Thus overlap integral and associated energy is ignored in most AOM treatments. ( ) () ( ) destablized by e (the corresponding L orbital is stabilized by ’2•1 = e’) The overall energy level diagrams for the M-L diatomic are: donor acceptor -only 2 dz e dxz 2 dx -y 2 2 dz L* e dyz e dyz dxy e dxz,dyz 2 dz e' 2 dz dxz 2 dx -y , dxy 2 dxy e 2 2 dx -y 2 2 dx -y , dxy dxz,dyz L (px, py) e' L (pz) e' L e' L e' Of course, more than 1 ligand in a typical coordination compound. The power of AOM is that the e and e energies are additive. Thus MO energy levels of the coordination compound are determined by simply summing e and e for each M(d)-L interaction. 5.04, Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II Lecture 16 Page 3 of 3