Download is minimally invasive left ventricular epicardial lead implantation the

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Heart failure wikipedia , lookup

Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup

Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup

Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup

Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup

Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
1423, either, cat: 48
IS MINIMALLY INVASIVE LEFT VENTRICULAR EPICARDIAL LEAD
IMPLANTATION THE BEST TREATMENT OPTION FOR
BIVENTRICULAR PACING IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE?
J.L. Navia, N. Brozzi, F.A. Atik, E.R. Nowicki, S. Al-Ruzzeh, E. Sepulveda,
E.H. Blackstone
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
Introduction: Biventricular pacing is an adjuvant treatment for patients with heart
failure and intraventricular conduction delay. Early and late failure rates to place
adequately are approximately 12% and 15%, respectively. Epicardial lead placement
is often a rescue procedure in those patients, we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of
LV epicardial lead placement using minimally invasive surgical approaches.
Methods: From 10/02 through 10/08, 205 patients underwent minimally invasive LV
lead placement .This includes, 65 (32%) video-assisted thoracoscopic, and 140 (68%)
mini-thoracotomy surgeries. One hundred forty-five (70%) were males, 90 (43%) had
previous cardiac surgery, 83 (40%) preop NYHA III-IV, 97 (47%) had ischemic
cardiomyopathy, preop LVEF 16.9+/-7.8%, and 136 (66%) had implantable cardio
defibrillators. The mean age was 69+/-10 years.
Results: There were no in-hospital deaths, intraoperative complications, or failure to
implant the LV lead. Median operative time was longer for the endoscopic approach
(175 min) than for mini-thoracotomy (117 min) (P=.006). QRS duration was shorter
postoperatively (mean change from preoperative -32+/-14 ms, P<.0001). NYHA IIIIV at 3 month 88 (42%), and at 6 month 65 (32%). LVEF improved (16.9% to 22.9%,
p<0.001). Impedance was less postoperatively (mean change -525+/-300 ohms,
P<.0001). No changes were evident in LV dimensions.
Conclusions: Minimally invasive LV epicardial lead placement is safe and effective.
Despite representing a high risk surgical group, epicardial approach offers selection of
the best pacing site with minimal morbidity and similar or superior results; and could
be considered as a primary option for resynchronization therapy.