* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download is minimally invasive left ventricular epicardial lead implantation the
Survey
Document related concepts
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
1423, either, cat: 48 IS MINIMALLY INVASIVE LEFT VENTRICULAR EPICARDIAL LEAD IMPLANTATION THE BEST TREATMENT OPTION FOR BIVENTRICULAR PACING IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE? J.L. Navia, N. Brozzi, F.A. Atik, E.R. Nowicki, S. Al-Ruzzeh, E. Sepulveda, E.H. Blackstone Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA Introduction: Biventricular pacing is an adjuvant treatment for patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. Early and late failure rates to place adequately are approximately 12% and 15%, respectively. Epicardial lead placement is often a rescue procedure in those patients, we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of LV epicardial lead placement using minimally invasive surgical approaches. Methods: From 10/02 through 10/08, 205 patients underwent minimally invasive LV lead placement .This includes, 65 (32%) video-assisted thoracoscopic, and 140 (68%) mini-thoracotomy surgeries. One hundred forty-five (70%) were males, 90 (43%) had previous cardiac surgery, 83 (40%) preop NYHA III-IV, 97 (47%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy, preop LVEF 16.9+/-7.8%, and 136 (66%) had implantable cardio defibrillators. The mean age was 69+/-10 years. Results: There were no in-hospital deaths, intraoperative complications, or failure to implant the LV lead. Median operative time was longer for the endoscopic approach (175 min) than for mini-thoracotomy (117 min) (P=.006). QRS duration was shorter postoperatively (mean change from preoperative -32+/-14 ms, P<.0001). NYHA IIIIV at 3 month 88 (42%), and at 6 month 65 (32%). LVEF improved (16.9% to 22.9%, p<0.001). Impedance was less postoperatively (mean change -525+/-300 ohms, P<.0001). No changes were evident in LV dimensions. Conclusions: Minimally invasive LV epicardial lead placement is safe and effective. Despite representing a high risk surgical group, epicardial approach offers selection of the best pacing site with minimal morbidity and similar or superior results; and could be considered as a primary option for resynchronization therapy.