Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Current and Future Clinical Trials Andreas Obermair Pathways Evidence (Mirena) Prevention of progression Oral Progestin vs. IUD Progestins offered on case-to-case basis (Mirena ± oral progestins) Baker et al.: Gynecologic Oncology Volume 125, Issue 1 2012 263 - 270 Pathological complete response to oral and IUD-delivered progestin treatment Abbreviations: CAH, complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia; EC, endometrioid adenocarcinoma Baker et al.: Gynecologic Oncology Volume 125, Issue 1 2012 263 - 270 Metaanalysis of relapse rates for fertilitysparing treatment of endometrial cancer 40% Ioannis D. Gallos et al.: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 207, Issue 4 2012 266.e1 - 266.e12 Metaanalysis of live birth rates for fertilitysparing treatment of endometrial cancer 30% Ioannis D. Gallos et al.: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 207, Issue 4 2012 266.e1 - 266.e12 Ongoing Trials Chemoprevention with Metformin Randomized, 4-arm study, placebo-controlled (double blind) Include: Postmenopausal, obese women (BMI > 35 [who are at risk to develop endometrial cancer]) Intervention: Metformin (850 mg bd for 4 months), Lifestyle intervention (weight loss, supervised exercise) Outcome: Effect of Metformin & Lifestyle intervention on biomarkers associated with endometrial proliferation Commenced March 2013 (2019) N = 100 Contact: Karen Lu, MD Anderson, TX Mirena + MPA Single-arm, prospective, multi-institutional study Include: EAC, g1, confined to endometrium*; wishing to maintain fertility (< 40 years) Intervention: Mirena + MPA (500 mg/d); 3-monthly endometrial samplings Outcome: Pathological response rate at 24 months Commenced January 2012 (2 years) N= 39 Contact: Korean GOG *Assessment method not defined Mirena Single-arm, prospective, multi-institutional study Include: endometrial hyperplasia* who wish to maintain fertility (>20 years) Intervention: Mirena IUD; endometrial sampling + TVUS every 3 months Outcome: Pathological response rate at 12 months Commenced November 2010 (2 years) N= 80 Contact: Korean GOG *Simple :: Complex :: Atypical not defined Megestrol (Hyperplasia only) Three-arm, prospective, multi-institutional study Include: atypical endometrial hyperplasia/EIN; must agree to a hysterectomy Exclude: Endometrial cancer Intervention: Megestrol in different doses and sequence (4 arms), placebo-controlled Outcomes: Response rate at 24 weeks Commenced July 2007 N= 260 Contact: US GOG feMME (AUS) Three-arm, prospective, multi-institutional study Include: atypical endometrial hyperplasia or EAC g1, CA125 < 30 U/ml, myoinvasion < 50% (MRI) Intervention: Mirena vs. Mirena + Metformin vs. Mirena + lifestyle intervention (weight loss, exercise) Outcomes: Response rate at 6 months Commence: July 2013 N= 165 Contact: QLD Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Summary of Treatment Trials Mirena + MPA (Korea) Mirena (Korea) Megestrol (GOG) feMME (AUS) Indication EHA, EAC EHA, EAC EHA EHA, EAC Allocation Single-arm Single-arm 3 arm 3 arm Mirena + MPA Mirena IUD Megestrol acetate Mirena, Metformin, Life style intervention Response at 24/12 Response at 12/12 Response at 24/52 Response at 6/12 2012 2010 2007 2013 39 80 260 165 Intervention Outcome Year N Evidence (weight loss) Weight loss is feasible (7%) V van Grueningen et al: Gynecol Oncol 2012 Preoperative weight loss: 7% achievable Prostate cancer response through lifestyle intervention (diet + weight loss) Evidence (Metformin) Anti-diabetic drug In-vitro Pharmaco-epidemiological data Case-reports Evidence – Metformin Gentler and kinder way to treat Patients with Endometrial Cancer Morbidly obese woman > 130 kg; EAC FIGO g1, no myoinvasion Day 5: Respiratory failure secondary to pneumonia Unplanned ICU admission; Requires ventilation, imaging, i.v. ABs Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S et al: Eur J Cancer. 2012 Sep;48(14):2155-62 Schema: Mirena ± Metformin ± Weight Loss Primary: Pathological Complete Response at 6 months Secondary: To predict the response to treatment through clinical, blood and tissue molecular biomarkers and to increase our molecular understanding of the biological pathogenesis of “early” EAC. feMME Trial - Eligibility Target: 165 patients with complex endometrial hyperplasia with atypia or grade 1 EAC Eligibility: Complex Endometrial Hyperplasia with atypia OR Grade 1 EAC – avoid enrolling patients with advanced disease who need expedited surgery Patients at high surgical risks or wish to retain fertility BMI > 30 kg/m2 CT scan: absence of extrauterine disease Myometrial invasion <50% (MRI) Serum CA125 ≤30 U/mL Contact QLD Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Andreas Obermair: [email protected] Acknowledgements: M Janda (QUT), ANZGOG (RAC), Val Gebski (CTC) Endorsed jointly by ANZGOG and ASGO National Ethics Application (covers NSW, VIC) QCGC will assist with HREC applications.