Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Impact of Social Protection Payments on Income Distribution John FitzGerald, TCD and ESRI Composition of Government Expenditure 80000 70000 60000 € Million 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 1995 1997 Transfers 1999 2001 2003 2005 Government Consumption 2007 2009 Other expenditure 2011 2013 Government Transfers as % of GDP Change 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2007-2011 Germany 16.0 15.8 17.4 16.7 15.7 15.6 15.7 -0.3 France 17.4 17.6 19.2 19.2 19.1 19.5 19.9 1.7 9.7 9.7 10.7 11.0 11.1 11.5 11.9 1.4 UK 12.1 12.6 14.3 14.2 14.2 14.6 14.5 2.1 Ireland 11.5 13.8 17.7 17.6 17.5 17.5 16.3 6.0 Greece 14.6 16.1 17.6 17.8 19.3 19.8 18.5 4.7 Spain 11.5 12.3 14.4 15.1 15.3 16.0 16.3 3.8 Portugal 14.1 14.6 16.4 16.4 17.0 17.5 18.4 2.9 Netherlands Source: EU AMECO database. GNP is used for Ireland, not GDP. Revenue Commissioners’ Data, Change between 2007 and 2011 Income Range 100-150 150-200 200-275 275+ 100+ All Taxpayers Number of Taxpayers -12.6 -13.0 -15.7 -28.4 -14.7 -13.4 Average Income -0.3 0.0 -0.2 -15.3 -9.3 -0.6 Total Income -12.8 -13.0 -15.9 -39.4 -22.6 -13.9 Gini coefficient before tax and welfare payments 59 57 55 53 51 49 47 45 2005 2006 2007 France 2008 Ireland 2009 Spain 2010 Portugal 2011 UK 2012 Gini coefficient after direct taxation and welfare payments 39 37 35 33 31 29 27 25 2005 2006 2007 France 2008 Ireland 2009 Spain 2010 Portugal 2011 UK 2012 Conclusions - 1 • Big fall in everyone’s income because of crisis • Governments decided to increase expenditure on welfare, especially relative to GDP • For those on high incomes: numbers fell dramatically; their tax rate increased. • A consequence of the fall in tax take from high income earners was that the rest of those with taxable incomes had to pay more tax Conclusions - 2 • A consequence of the changes was that: – Without tax and welfare payments there would have been a big increase in inequality, but – Because of the increase in welfare expenditure and taxes there has been a small fall in inequality – This has not been enough to prevent a rise in those at risk of poverty – Unemployment has had a major impact, which public policy on welfare has only partially offset Conclusions - 3 • While individual policy changes announced in successive budgets, taken together have not been particularly progressive, the overall impact of government policy on expenditure and taxation has had a progressive impact, reducing inequality