Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Specific language impairment wikipedia , lookup
Telecommunications relay service wikipedia , lookup
Hearing aid wikipedia , lookup
Hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Noise-induced hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Sensorineural hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Audiology and hearing health professionals in developed and developing countries wikipedia , lookup
THE EUROPEAN RESPONSE TO CONGENITAL HEARING LOSS Ferdinando Grandori, Director, CNR Center of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnic of Milan, Italy [email protected] We are entering a new era in the care of infants with hearing loss. The most important period for speech, language, cognitive and mental development is generally regarded as the first 1 to 2 years of life and crucially appropriate input is needed at this time, while the average age of identification of hearing losses, in the vast majority of the European countries still remains close to three years (about 31 months). Etiology of congenital hearing loss is still a matter of epidemiological research, but increasing evidence indicates that over than 50% have a genetic cause, 70% being non syndromal, with 75% being due to a mutation in an autosomal recessive gene. Up to 100 genes are responsible for nonsyndromal sensorineural hearing impairment. In the past years 28 autosomal recessive, 30 autosomal dominant and 5 X-linked loci have been mapped. It is now possible to offer mutation testing of babies affected with non-syndromal sensorineural hearing impairment to determine whether their hearing impairment is due to a genetic cause allowing precise Mendelian recurrence risk advice to be provided for couples where a mutation is identified. The number of newborns with hearing losses is about 2 per thousand, while it can be as high as some 5 per cent for those babies who are admitted into the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) or belong to at-risk categories for hearing loss. The result is that for many hearing-impaired children, much of the crucial period for language and speech learning is lost and they shall never enjoy full social development. On the other hand, all available scientific results from pilot integrated newborn screening and intervention programmes unequivocally show that babies who are technically severely impaired, if treated at a few months of age (i.e. less than 6), are not distinguishable from normal hearing babies at about 2 to 3 years, for speech and language development, width of vocabulary, emotional stability, behaviour and vestibular responses. Very early detection of hearing impairment in newborns and subsequent habilitation/intervention at a few months of age has been recently considered the focus of health care systems all over the World (NIH Consensus Statement on Universal Hearing Screening in Infants, 1994; World Health Organisation, Resolution 48.9, 1995; European Consensus Statement on Neonatal Hearing Screening, May 1998; American Academy of Pediatrics Position Statement, 1999; Joint Committee on Infant Hearing Position Statement, 2000). The 1998 European Consensus Statement on Neonatal Hearing Screening is the result of the European Consensus Development Conference organised by the Biomed2 Concerted Action AHEAD, and it has been reported in its full version by more than 18 journals in the area of Audiology, Otolaryngology, Pediatrics and Neonatology. It was the development of technology for recording Otoacoustic Emissions (OAEs) that made feasible the implementation of objective, reliable, fast (few seconds) and low cost (<10 Euro per baby) methods of universal newborn hearing screening. These technologies were entirely developed in Europe and are being applied by European manufacturers who still maintain the technical leadership in the field. Research in hearing has advanced dramatically over the most recent years. The advance began with the startling realisation that existing knowledge could not explain the acoustic response of the peripheral ear to sound and particularly Otoacoustic Emissions. The very understanding of both the physical basis for hearing and the nature of hearing impairment were challenged. Contractile properties of the cochlear receptors (similar to those responsible for muscular contraction) were shown to be present in the outer hair cells. Different types of OAEs were discovered: spontaneous, click-evoked, distortion product otoacoustic emissions. The action of the cochlear efferent system was demonstrated objectively in humans. The presence of these active mechanisms is now known to represent the process by which the whole response of the cochlea to sounds comes to be actually under the control of physiological processes, thus linking together haircell motility, OAEs, sensory hearing loss, and the influence of high cerebral functions on the auditory periphery. On more practical grounds, recording methods based on OAEs do provide an objective and reliable assessment of even mild sensory hearing loss, by far the type of permanent losses with the highest incidence in infants, children and adults. OAE recording is being considered as the method of choice to assess hearing in neonates. In those areas – still quite few and scattered all over Europe – in which early detection is currently done by means of mass screening programs, the average age of identification of hearing losses has dropped to about 3 to 6 months, so that the remediation process can start very soon, thus helping to ensure early language and speech development. The penetration of such programmes differs greatly from country to country, and within the same country it varies from area to area. For example, Austria has enacted legislation mandating newborn hearing screening and early intervention in 1997, as a direct result of a previous European Project form the Biomed 2 (Project AHEAD), and at present about 65% of all newborns are screened (the coverage was lower than 1% in 1996) and the intervention starts at 3 to 4 months of age, much like in the Flanders (mandatory, current coverage of about 90%) and in a few regions, or hospitals, in France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, The Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain and United Kingdom. In other countries of the EU the level of awareness among pediatricians and audiologists is still rather low. In the USA newborn screening and extremely early intervention is now mandatory in more than 28 States and legislation is pending in other 11 States (in 1996 screening programmes were implemented only in a few centres), and it is estimated that by the end of Year 2000 about 20 to 25% of all newborns in the US will be screened for hearing. A new European Project (AHEAD II, 2000-03, a Thematic Network) will provide a framework for developing in the European area well integrated systems of universal hearing screening, diagnosis and intervention. The main objectives of Project AHEAD II are: i) make significant contribution to the technical progress for recording, processing, interpreting and scoring OAE responses; ii) advance the whole field of OAEs and validate the clinical applications of the new techniques mainly in newborn hearing screening and assessment programmes; iii) establish agreed common protocols for testing and educate the clinical community with the realisable applications achieved todate in the area of screening and intervention; iv) demonstrate practical feasibility of universal newborn hearing screening programmes and of extremely early intervention at a few months of age; v) provide full assistance to the creation of new integrated programmes of hearing assessment and early intervention; vi) publicise the achievable results among audiologists and otolaryngologists, neonatologists, pediatricians, speech-language pathologists, teachers of the deaf and primary health care providers.