Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Sickle Cell and Pain Management: A New Era Wally R. Smith, MD Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine Principal Investigator VCU Basic and Translational Research Program in Sickle Cell Disease VCU Sickle Cell Disease Outcomes Research Center, SCD Clinical Research Network Scientific Director VCU Center on Health Disparities Chronic Palliative/Symptomatic Therapy • • • • Folate Opioids--Short and long-acting Non-steroidals, other analgesics Local therapy – Heat – Massage – TENS • Coping, psychosocial, holistic interventions • Case management Smith’s Hypotheses • Pain phenotype transformation to mixed phenotype – – – – – in some patients From acute-on-chronic, multi-local inflammatory pain to also central and/or peripheral neuropathic pain due to acute-on-chronic vaso-occlusion, inflammation, and ischemia, resulting in central or local neuronal damage A threshold of ischemic necrosis of neurons, before phenotype transformation • SCD ischemic neuropathy may share common mechanisms with other neuropathic pain syndromes • Opioid, non-opioid chemical, and other approaches may improve pain in SCD • By far, the best approach to SCD pain is interruption of sickle cell vasculopathy in childhood Nociceptive Pain • a noxious stimulus-detecting sensory system. …an alarm mediated by high-threshold …primary sensory neurons that feed into nociceptive pathways of the central nervous system …. tuned to respond to intense thermal or mechanical stimuli as well as exogenous and endogenous chemical mediators – Costigan M, Scholz J, Woolf CJ. Neuropathic pain: a maladaptive response of the nervous system to damage. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009;32:1-32. Review. PubMed PMID: 19400724; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2768555. Inflammatory Pain • This pain occurs in response to tissue injury and the subsequent inflammatory response. Here the imperative shifts from protecting the body against a potentially damaging noxious stimulus to addressing the consequences of damage. To aid healing and repair of the injured body part, the sensory nervous system undergoes a profound change in its responsiveness; normally innocuous stimuli now produce pain and responses to noxious stimuli are both exaggerated and prolonged. – Costigan M, Scholz J, Woolf CJ. Neuropathic pain: a maladaptive response of the nervous system to damage. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009;32:1-32. Review. PubMed PMID: 19400724; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2768555. The Neuropathic Pain Phenotype • After nerve injury maladaptive changes can occur in injured sensory neurons and along the entire nociceptive pathway within the CNS, which may lead to spontaneous pain or pain hypersensitivity. The resulting neuropathic pain syndromes present as a complex combination of negative and positive symptoms, which vary enormously from individual to individual. This variation depends on a diversity of underlying pathophysiological changes resulting from the convergence of etiological, genotypic, and environmental factors. • The pain phenotype can serve therefore, as a window on underlying pathophysiological neural mechanisms and as a guide for developing personalized pain medicine. – 1: von Hehn CA, Baron R, Woolf CJ. Deconstructing the neuropathic pain phenotype to reveal neural mechanisms. Neuron. 2012 Feb 23;73(4):638-52. Review. PubMed PMID: 22365541; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3319438. Pain Phenotype Transition in SCD Smith’s Hypotheses—Level of Support 1. Sickle cell pain may in some patients transform from purely acute-on-chronic, multi-local inflammatory pain to also central and/or peripheral neuropathic pain (phenotype transformation) 2. The phenotype transformation occurs due to acuteon-chronic vaso-occlusion, inflammation, and ischemia, resulting in central or local neuronal damage 3. A threshold of ischemic necrosis of neurons must be reached, likely during late childhood, before phenotype transformation in SCD 4. Sickle cell disease ischemic neuropathy may share common mechanisms with other neuropathic pain syndromes 5. Phenotype transformation manifests as both inflammatory pain and neuropathic pain—a mixed phenotype 6. Thus, opioid, non-opioid chemical, and other approaches may improve pain in SCD 7. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia is a minor component of pain in SCD 8. By far, the best approach to SCD pain is interruption of sickle cell vasculopathy in childhood • • • • 1 Pain chronicity manifests over time 1 Etiology of chronic pain not etiologically distinguishable using current data (1 study) 1, 2,3 Acute pain fluctuations continue throughout life, supporting. • 4-Pain Locations multiple, somewhat bilateral, pain descriptors often neuropathic 5-No data • 6-Weak, correlational support for 6a • • 7-Data not conclusive-correlational 8-Rel’.of sev. of SCD pain to sev. of vasculopathy (response to HU, transplantation, geography of residence, and seasonal temperature/climate changes). Pain Intensity On Crisis Vs Noncrisis Vs. Utilization Days Intensity Above water Submerged Utilization 6.5 2.3 Crisis w/o utilization 5.5 2.1 3.5% 13.1% 39.3% 44.1% Mean Std Dev Pain w/o crisis, util. No Pain *Percentage of days. Utilization= utilization with or without crisis or pain; Crisis= crisis without utilization; Pain= pain without crisis or utilization Adapted from Smith WR, et. al. Ann Intern Med 2008 Jan 15, 148(2):94-101 4.2 2 0 0 Acute Nociceptive, Inflammatory Pain Likely Hierarchy of Sub Biologies ENVIRONMENTAL Acute Temperature change (cold climate, wind speed) Barometric pressure change Oxygen delivery change (infection, other) SYSTEMS BIOLOGY Acute Hemolysis, free Hb, NO depletion Acute deoxygenation Acute Vasoconstriction Acute sickling Acute Vasoocclusion, ischemia Acute sickling ACUTE PAIN Chronic Nociceptive, Inflammatory Pain Likely Hierarchy of Sub Biologies SYSTEMS BIOLOGY Macrophage & immune Activation Hemolysis, Oxidant generation Reperfusion Injury Physiology NO depletion Inflammation Coagulation activation Endothelial activation RBC sickling CHRONIC PAIN Vascular stasis Acute inflammation, Fig. (1). Probable hierarchy of the major sub-biologies participating in development of sickle vasculopathy. Modified from Kato GJ, Hebbel RP, Steinberg MH, Gladwin MT; Vasculopathy in Sickle Cell Disease: Biology, pathophysiology, genetics, translational medicine and new research directions. [Meeting Report] Am. J. Hematol., 2009. Contributors to Inflammation of SCD • ↑ number of granulocytes & monocytes in blood • ↑ activation of granulocytes and monocytes • activated phenotype of circulating endothelial cells (pro-adhesive, procoagulant, pro-oxidative) • ↑ soluble VCAM and P-selectin • activation of the coagulation system • ↑ levels of inflammatory mediators (e.g., IL6, CRP, TNFα, IL1β) • ↑ levels of acute phase reactants (e.g., CRP, phospholipase-A2, ferritin) • ↑ levels of endothelial cell perturbants * • ↑ microparticles from monocytes, platelets, endothelial cells, red cells. sickle mice have an inflammatory state – * which include, but are not limited to: hypoxia, thrombin, IL2, IL4, IL8, endotoxin,TGFβ, thrombospondin, G-CSF, GM-CSF,endothelin-1, 12-HETE, peroxynitrite, serum amyloid a, PGE2, fibrinogen, leukotriene B4, homocysteine, CD40 Ligand • Robert P. Hebbel, Greg M. Vercellotti and Karl A. Nath. A Systems Biology Consideration of the Vasculopathy of Sickle Cell Anemia: The Need for Multi-Modality Chemo-Prophylaxis. Cardiovascular & Haematological Disorders-Drug Targets, 2009, 9, 271-292 Replacement By Donor Derived Red Cells Allows Tapering Of Opioids IV morphine equivalent (mg) 2000 1600 1200 800 400 0 0 4 8 12 16 Takes weeks – Data, courtesy Tisdale, et al. Weeks 20 24 28 Pain Locations in PiSCES • 201 subjects had: – more than 5 days with pain >0 – body locator boxes endorsed • 15,563 patient-days of body locator chart information analyzed • On these days: – an average of 11.3% of boxes were checked • (analyses of % boxes checked not shown) – an average of 3.3 of 16 sites (21%) were painful No Association of Predominant Bilaterality With: • Gender • Age • Genotype – SS vs SC • Calendar Seasons – Warm (April-Sept) vs Cold (OctMarch) seasons • Although intensity of pain and frequency of pain higher in colder months Relationship of Pain to Opioid Use 100% Mean Pain Intensity on Pain Days (SD)* 85 90% Percent Pain Days (SD)+ 80% 70% 60% LA opioid (+/any analgesic) 4.8 (1.5) 81.9 (25.4) SA opioid (+/non-opioid) 4.1 (1.4) 51.9 (35.3) Non-opioid only 3.0 (1.2) 16.8 (23.3) None 2.8 (2.0) 12.3 (30.9) 103 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 21 0% 10 Patients LA=long-acting, SA=Shortacting. *Mean pain on pain days, overall ANOVA p<0.0001. All paired comparisons statistically significant except none vs non-opioid and none vs SA opioid. + Percent pain days, overall ANOVA p<0.0001. All paired comparisons statistically significant except none vs. non-opioid • Fewer (38.8%) used LA opioids (w or w/o other analg’s) than used SA (47.0% w or w/o non-opioids) • 9.6% only non-opioid, 4.6% none analgesics • Pain intens, freq higher with LA or higher total opioid Opioid Use and SCD Lab, Pain Complications N Hydroxyurea user Yes 59 No 160 Ankle Ulcers Yes 26 No 192 Avascular Necrosis Yes 48 No 170 Priapism (males only) Yes No Lab values (means) %Fetal Hemoglobin White Blood Count Number (%) of subjects who use opioids (n=188) Number (%) of subjects who do not use opioids (n=31) 58 (98.3) 130 (81.2) 1 (1.7) 30 (18.8) p-value comparing opioid users and non-users 0.0013 0.3385 24 (92.3) 164 (85.4) 2 ( 7.7) 28 (14.6) 0.0871 45 (93.7) 143 (84.1) 3 ( 6.3) 27 (15.9) 0.8912 15 68 N 13 (86.7) 58 (85.3) Mean (SD) for opioid user 2 (13.3) 10 (14.7) Mean (SD) for those not using opioid 180 158 3.9 (7.2) 11.2 (4.5) 4.1 (7.3) 10.5 (4.3) P value comparing opioid users and non-users 0.8955 0.4913 Pain Management in SCD: The New Era • Hydroxyurea • Non-opioid neuropathic agents • Anti-sickling medications – Anti-inflammatories/Selectin Inhibitors – Amino Acids – Platelet inhibitors – Hb-O2 Covalent Binders Hydroxyurea • Only FDA approved anti-sickling medication • It helps make fetal hemoglobin (Hb F, baby’s hemoglobin) within the red cells • This stops abnormal hemoglobin strands, decreases sickling • Hydroxyurea makes the red cells healthier • 50% reduction in hospitalization • 40% improved mortality • Also drops the white blood cell count – Major side effect – Sometimes too low Hydroxyurea –approved for SCD 1996 • Ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor • Reduces cell division during Sphase • Inhibits RNA and protein synthesis • Metabolized to genotoxic products – Potential for adverse effects • Timson J. Hydroxyurea. Mutat Res 1975; 32(2):115-132. Hydroxyurea-- Reduction in: – Acute painful episodes – Acute chest syndrome events – Hospitalizations – Blood transfusions • Charache S, Terrin ML, Moore RD, Dover GJ, McMahon RP, Barton FB et al. Design of the multicenter study of hydroxyurea in sickle cell anemia. Controlled Clin Trials 1995; 16:432-446. • Charache S, Terrin ML, Moore RD, Dover GJ, Barton FB, Eckert SV et al. Effect of hydroxyurea on the frequency of painful crises in sickle cell anemia. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:1317-1322. – Costs of care • Moore RD, Charache S, Terrin ML, Barton FB, Ballas SK, Investigators of the MUlticenter Study of Hydroxyurea in Sickle cell Anemia. Cost-effectiveness of hydroxyurea in sickle cell anemia. Am J Hematol 2000; 64:26-31. Hydroxyurea: Increase in: • Fetal hemoglobin (HbF) – Steinberg MH, Lu Z-H, Barton FB, Terrin ML, Charache S, Dover GJ et al. Fetal hemoglobin in sickle cell anemia: Determinants of response to hydroxyurea. Blood 1997; 89:1078-1088. • Physical capacity – Hackney AC, Hezier W, Gulledge TP, Jones S, Strayhorn D, Busby M et al. Effects of hydroxyurea administration on the body weight, body composition and exercise performance of patients with sickle-cell anaemia. Clin Sci 1997; 92:481-486. • Quality of life – Ballas SK, Barton FB, Waclawiw MA, Swerdlow P, Eckman JR, Pegelow CH et al. Hydroxyurea and sickle cell anemia: effect on quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4:59. • Survival (40% reduction in mortality) – Steinberg MH, Barton F, Castro O, Pegelow CH, Ballas SK, Kutlar A et al. Effect of hydroxyurea on mortality and morbidity in adult sickle cell anemia: risks and benefits up to 9 years of treatment. Jama 2003; 289(13):16451651. Ship HU Enhancing Use of Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Disease Using Patient Navigators R18HL112737 Funded by National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Sept 2012-June 2017 What does “Ship HU” Mean? Start healing in patients with hydroxyurea Stop hemolysis in patients with hydroxyurea Stop hurting in patients with hydroxyurea SHIP HU: Specific Aim 1 Demonstrate the feasibility of a patient navigatorbased program to improve the percentage of adult (age 15 and older) patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) in the Richmond and Tidewater regions of Virginia who are in SCD specialty care. SHIP HU: Specific Aim 2 Demonstrate the effectiveness of a patient navigatorbased program to improve hydroxyurea (HU) (re-) initiation and adherence among adult patients with SCD in the Richmond and Tidewater regions of Virginia who are eligible for HU. Overall Justification of Ship HU • Hydroxyurea (HU) may be lifesaving and should be given to eligible SCD patients. • Specialists prescribe Hydroxyurea to SCD patients • Large % SCD patients not in SCD specialty care, barriers to care. What is a Patient Navigator? • Lay member of a community – works either for pay or as a volunteer in association with the local health care system. – shares ethnicity, language, socioeconomic status, and life experiences with community members. – links community members to the medical care system, provide social networking, social support, and personalized interventions • Other terms – Community Health Advisor, Lay Health Advocate, Promotor, Outreach Educator, Community Health Representative, Peer Health Promoter, or Peer Counselor Planned Journey of Ship HU • Address barriers to care and to HU use • Two-phase demonstration – Improvement in the % with SCD who are in SCD specialty care (Phase I) – Improvement in adherence to HU of eligible SCD adults (Phase II). • Use existing health apparatus – State of Virginia (VDH), two academic med. Ctr’s • Use specially trained SCD patient navigators (PNs) Ship HU: Participating Providers • Two adult, two pediatric specialty clinics – VCU • Pediatric clinic (15 and older) • Adult Clinic (17 and older) – EVMS/CHKD • CHKD (15 and older, including Oyster Point clinic) • EVMS (17 and older) Interventions to Alter Health Behaviors Intervention Target Law/Policy Change Environmental Setting Enviromental Setting Advertising Macro-level Sectors of influence Macro-Level Sectors of Influence Health Fair, Build Clinic, change clinic operations Institutions Hire Doctor or Navigator Patient-Clinician Relationship Family or church Social Networks intervention, Facebook One-to-one counseling Individual Factors (from Navigator, anyone), Rx Institutions Patient-Clinician Relationship Social Networks Individual Factors Biopyschosocial spriritual Template for Regional Recruitment Strategy Intervention Target Expected Benefits Immediate Recruitment Results Advertising (Radio, newspaper, fliers, etc.) Macro-level influence • • • • Awareness Reach the “tipping point” Find partners Generate recruitment leads Low Health Fairs Institutions • • • • Awareness Reach the “tipping point” Find partners Generate recruitment leads Low Presentations, Events Institutions, patient social networks • • • • Awareness Find partners Generate recruitment leads Recruit Medium Navigator calls, followup of leads Social networks (of navigators) • • • Find partners Generate recruitment leads Recruit Medium ED and Clinic Recruitment Social networks (of patients) • Generate recruitment leads • Recruit High Church interventions Social Networks (of patients) • Generate recruitment leads • Recruit Medium to high Electronic Pre-screening (Medicaid, Health Dept Records) Individuals • Recruit High Ways ODMS can help Ship HU • Help identify clients and assist with recruitment into our study. 800-828-6938 – Send a letter to your patients on your letterhead with study details. – Organize recruiting events at which Ship HU staff could speak . – Tips to Ship HU staff about how best to reach clients. – Letters of support or other endorsements to organizations and media outlets who may advertise our study or refer clients.