Download 2015 URJ Biennial Re..

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Doing gender wikipedia , lookup

Gender advertisement wikipedia , lookup

Childhood gender nonconformity wikipedia , lookup

Sociology of gender wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Below please find recommendations by the URJ Resolutions Committee for
adoption at the URJ Biennial 2015 taking place in Orlando on November 4-8,
2015. The resolutions were submitted to the Committee in accordance with
the requirements of Article XIII, Section 11 of the Union Constitution and
Bylaws.
We encourage you to review the proposed Resolutions and send your
comments, concerns or feedback to Scott Zucker at
[email protected]. Much informative debate takes place at
the Biennial and therefore the Temple Sinai delegates attending will have
discretion, based on congregational and Board input, to vote according to
developments on the Biennial floor.
 Resolution in Support of Paid Family Leave
 Resolution on Mandatory Immunization Laws
 Resolution on the Rights of Transgender and Gender NonConforming People
These resolutions can also be viewed by visiting www.urj.org.
10/7/2015
Resolution in Support of Paid Family Leave ­ URJ
© 2010 Union for Reform Judaism. All rights reserved.
Resolution in Support of Paid Family Leave
Submitted by the Commission on Social Action of Reform Judaism
Background
The URJ has long prioritized workers' well­being, from our support for Living Wage Campaigns,1 to calling for
Workers' Rights in the United States,2 to urging reform of the Health Care System,3 to our 2013 URJ resolution on
Paid Sick Days.4 Even still, workers must too often choose between their health or the health of their families and
their job and financial security.
Paid family and medical leave – often of extended duration – is time away from one's job at full or partial pay to
attend to one's own serious illness or the serious illness of a family member or the birth, adoption or foster
placement of a child. Out of 185 countries reviewed by the International Labour Organization, the United States is
one of just two that does not guarantee paid maternity leave, the other being Papua New Guinea.5
Paid leave legislation proposed in Congress, known as the Family and Medical Insurance Leave Act (FAMILY Act),
would ensure that qualified employees continue to receive an income for up to 12­weeks of leave to care for their
own health, the health of a child, parent, spouse or domestic partner, or the birth or adoption of a child. It builds
on the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), enacted in 1993 with the URJ's support, which provided 12 weeks of
unpaid leave for similar purposes. However, unlike FMLA, the FAMILY Act would cover workers in businesses of all
sizes, as well as employees who work part­time or have less time on the job than required for FMLA eligibility.
The FAMILY Act is also modeled on successful state programs, guaranteeing workers up to 66 percent of their
usual pay for up to 12 weeks, funded through small payroll deductions of 4/10 of one percent, split evenly
between employees and employers.
According to the National Partnership for Women and Families, "only 13 percent of workers in the United States
have access to paid family leave through their employers, and fewer than 40 percent have access to personal
medical leave through employer­provided short­term disability insurance."6
Paid family leave is important not only for the immediate health of the individual, but also to relieve the stress of
the caretaker and to sustain the worker's economic security during leave. Thirteen percent of families with a new
infant enter into poverty within the first month because of the combined effects of a need for increased income
and a reduced number of working hours.7 In the year after giving birth, new mothers who take paid leave are
more likely than those who take no paid leave to stay in the work force. Among those who receive partial or no
pay during leave, 33% borrow money, dip into savings, or put off paying bills, while 15% go on public assistance
to help provide basic necessities for their families. Paid family and medical leave can help address these
challenges. Studies also show that when parents are able to take time off to care for a sick child, the child
recovers faster.
Eligibility and pay­for mechanisms differ among federal and state proposals and existing programs. California,
New Jersey and Rhode Island each have paid family leave laws and longstanding Temporary Disability Insurance
laws (for personal medical leave) with varying methods to fund this leave and different lengths of time­off
provided. These programs are funded by payroll contributions from employees and/or employers, averaging less
than one percent of paycheck contributions from either party. Eligibility is based on prior earnings history, how
long the person has been working and the individual the worker is taking leave to care for. States vary as to
whom they allow someone to care for under paid family leave: only for the birth or adoption of a child (e.g.
Washington); only for immediate family such as parents, spouses, domestic partners and children (e.g. New
Jersey and California); or for a more broad definition of family including grandparents, parents­in­law and a civil
union partner (e.g. Rhode Island).
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Federation of Independent Business have generally spoken
against federal and state paid family leave laws because the burden, they argue, is placed on the employer,
especially small businesses. Others have stated their opposition to paid leave measures, asserting they hinder job
growth. However, research from California and New Jersey where paid family leave already exists dispel these
concerns. , A growing list of businesses support paid leave programs, citing the importance of paid leave to
worker retention and their ability to ensure employees have access to the paid time off they need without putting
the sole burden of providing leave on employers.
Jewish tradition speaks strongly to valuing workers' dignity as well as maintaining healthy families. We are taught
http://urj.org/about/union/governance/reso/2015biennial/?syspage=article&item_id=118442&printable=1
1/3
10/7/2015
Resolution in Support of Paid Family Leave ­ URJ
in the Torah, "You shall not abuse a needy and destitute laborer, whether a fellow Israelite or a stranger in one of
the communities of your land. You must pay out the wages due on the same day, before the sun sets, for the
worker is needy and urgently depends on it; else a cry to the Eternal will be issued against you and you will incur
guilt" (Deut. 24:14­15). Later tradition expands on this teaching by addressing not only wages but also working
conditions. The rabbis of the Talmud taught in the case in which an employer says to workers, "I raised your
wages in order that you would begin early and stay late," they may reply, "You raised our wages in order that we
would do better work" (Bava M'tzia 83a). From these ancient principles our ancestors derived an ethical
employment system that mandated fair and sensitive treatment toward laborers.
Under Jewish law, employees also have obligations to fulfill in respect to their employers including working
faithfully at their highest capacity, keeping themselves satiated and refraining from working both days and nights
(Berakhot 16a). As Maimonides noted, "Just as the employer is enjoined not to deprive the poor worker of his hire
or withhold it from him when it is due, so is the worker enjoined not to deprive the employer of the benefit of this
work by idling away his time, a little here and a little there, thus wasting the whole day deceitfully" (Mishneh
Torah, Book 13, Chapter 13:7).
Our tradition also addresses the moral need to ensure our health: "Since by keeping the body in health and vigor,
one walks in the ways of God­it being impossible during sickness to have any understanding or knowledge of the
Creator ­ it is a person's duty to avoid whatever is injurious to the body and cultivate habits conducive to health
and vigor" (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Book of Knowledge, Laws Relating to Moral and Ethical Conduct, 1). And
throughout Jewish history the provision of health services is seen as an essential aspect of a moral society
(Mishneh Torah, Hilchot De'ot IV: 23).
Connecting the ideas of labor and health is a Jewish dictum teaching that employers and employees have a
common interest in workers' health and a mutual obligation to secure the wellness of the labor force. We are
taught that "one who withholds an employee's wages is as though he deprived him of his life" (Baba Metzia 112a).
These values have inspired the URJ to offer paid family leave to its own employees.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Union for Reform Judaism:
1. Supports and advocates for legislation that provides paid family and medical leave, while recognizing that
we must also assess the feasibility and impact of any specific proposal;
2. Calls upon our congregations across North America to help build coalitions and advocate for the passage of
paid family and medical leave laws; and
3. Urges our congregations and all arms of the Reform Movement to provide, to the extent feasible, paid family
and medical leave for their employees, and set an example for their communities.
[1] http://urj.org/about/union/governance/reso/?syspage=article&item_id=1987
[2] http://urj.org/about/union/governance/reso/?syspage=article&item_id=1930
[3] http://urj.org/about/union/governance/reso/?syspage=article&item_id=2047
[4] http://urj.org/about/union/governance/reso/?syspage=article&item_id=107300
[5] http://fortunedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/wcms_242615.pdf from
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/07/30/3465922/paid­family­leave
[6] http://www.nationalpartnership.org/issues/work­family/paid­leave.html
[7] http://www.woodsfund.org/site/files/735/69201/260704/363127/causes­of­
poverty_report_by_Heartland_Alliance.pdf
[8] http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/12/12/3053911/family­act­benefits/
[9] Heymann, J., & Earle, A. (2010). "Raising the global floor: dismantling the myth that we can't afford good
working conditions for everyone. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Politics and Policy.
[10] http://www.nationalpartnership.org/research­library/work­family/paid­leave/state­paid­family­leave­laws.pdf
[11] http://www.nationalpartnership.org/research­library/work­family/paid­leave/existing­tdi­programs.pdf
[12] http://www.nationalpartnership.org/research­library/work­family/paid­leave/state­paid­family­leave­laws.pdf
[13]http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2014/07/paid_family_leave_is_a_new_jersey_success_story_opinion.html
[14] http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2014­07­17/paid­family­leave­is­good­for­business
http://urj.org/about/union/governance/reso/2015biennial/?syspage=article&item_id=118442&printable=1
2/3
10/7/2015
Resolution in Support of Paid Family Leave ­ URJ
[15] See http://www.nationalpartnership.org/research­library/work­family/paid­leave/paid­leave­works­in­
california­new­jersey­and­rhode­island.pdf; http://www.nationalpartnership.org/research­library/work­
family/paid­leave/paid­leave­good­for­business.pdf; www.betterwbb.org
Comments left on this website are monitored. By posting a comment you are in agreement with Terms & Conditions.
http://urj.org/about/union/governance/reso/2015biennial/?syspage=article&item_id=118442&printable=1
3/3
10/7/2015
Resolution on Mandatory Immunization Laws ­ URJ
© 2010 Union for Reform Judaism. All rights reserved.
Resolution on Mandatory Immunization Laws
Submitted by the Commission on Social Action of Reform Judaism
Background
Throughout the history of the Jewish people, one of the most sacred commandments has been pikuach
nefesh, the idea that the preservation of life takes precedence over almost all other Jewish laws. The
Talmud teaches that "One who saves one life, it is accounted as if a world is saved,"1 and the
medieval Jewish philosopher­physician Maimonides wrote: "God created food and water; we must use
them in staving off hunger and thirst. God created drugs and compounds and gave us the intelligence
necessary to discover their medicinal properties; we must use them in warding off illness and
disease."2
One of the most important achievements in human history when it comes to enhancing public health
has been the development of vaccines. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, a vaccine is "a product that produces immunity from a disease and can be administered
through needle injections, by mouth, or by aerosol."3 Vaccines consist of killed or modified microbes,
parts of microbes or microbial DNA that "trick" the immune system into thinking an infection has
occurred. The immune system then attacks the harmless vaccine and prepares for future invasions,
thus immunizing the individual.
In addition to inoculating the individual, vaccines contribute to the creation of "community (or herd)
immunity." According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, "When a critical portion
of a community is immunized against a contagious disease, most members of the community are
protected against that disease because there is little opportunity for an outbreak. Even those who are
not eligible for certain vaccines—such as infants, pregnant women or immuno­compromised
individuals—get some protection because the spread of contagious disease is contained. This is known
as ‘community immunity.'"4
Recently, a notable increase in the number of measles and whooping cough diagnoses have drawn
attention to declining immunization rates across North America and a potential weakening in
community immunity. This is of particular concern to U.S. public health officials who had declared
measles eliminated nationwide in the year 2000.
A 1999 CCAR responsum on Compulsory Immunization (5759.10), finds that vaccines qualify as
refu'ah bedukah, proven remedies, and are therefore an obligation. The responsum states that "Jewish
tradition would define immunization as part of the mitzvah of healing and recognize it as a required
measure, since we are not entitled to endanger ourselves or the children for whom we are responsible
by refusing proven medical treatment." Moreover, the responsum endorses "programs of compulsory
immunization in our communities, with exemptions granted to those individuals whose medical
conditions place them at particular risk of injury or untoward side effects. Aside from those individual
cases, there are no valid Jewish religious grounds to support the refusal to immunize as a general
principle." Currently, all fifty U.S. states have compulsory vaccination laws. Reflecting the diversity of faith
traditions in North American life, and the fact that some faith traditions reject the practice of
vaccination, forty­eight states offer religious and/or personal/philosophical vaccination exemptions. In
Canada, only two provinces require students to be vaccinated before entering school, and medical,
philosophical, and religious exemptions exist. At the same time, private institutions in both countries
retain the discretion to set their own, stricter vaccination policies.
The consensus view of Reform Judaism, including that established in the aforementioned CCAR
http://urj.org/about/union/governance/reso/2015biennial/?syspage=article&item_id=118441&printable=1
1/2
10/7/2015
Resolution on Mandatory Immunization Laws ­ URJ
responsum, embraces the vital role vaccines play in ensuring individual and public health. For that
reason, the longstanding and ongoing policy for all individuals attending URJ camps and Israel
programs has been to require immunization for all children, staff, faculty, and their families with
exemptions permitted only in strictly limited and specifically enumerated medical circumstances.5
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Union for Reform Judaism:
1. Affirms that in the case of mandatory immunizations, pikuach nefesh and refu'ah bedukah are
our guiding principles. Reform Jewish religious tenets prioritize protecting the health of all
individuals, the most medically vulnerable members of the community, and the community as a
whole, and do not provide a basis for a religious exemption from mandatory immunizations.
2. Supports mandatory immunization laws, with the only acceptable exemptions being:
1. Medical exemptions; and
2. Religious exemptions that must be suspended if community immunity is deemed at
risk by public health officials.
3. Urges Reform Movement congregations and institutions to
1. Adopt policies that require mandatory vaccinations with medical exemptions in programs
that serve children and youth; and
2. Educate members about the scientific evidence and Jewish values in support of mandatory
vaccinations.
[1] Mishnah Sanhedrin 4:9
[2] Maimonides's Commentary on Mishnah Pesachim 4:9
[3] Vaccines.gov
[4] Vaccines.gov
[5] 2014 Policy Statement on Vaccine Status of Campers, Staff, Faculty, and their Families Attending
URJ Camps and Israel Programs
Comments left on this website are monitored. By posting a comment you are in agreement with Terms & Conditions.
http://urj.org/about/union/governance/reso/2015biennial/?syspage=article&item_id=118441&printable=1
2/2
10/7/2015
Resolution on the Rights of Transgender and Gender Non­Conforming People ­ URJ
© 2010 Union for Reform Judaism. All rights reserved.
Resolution on the Rights of Transgender and
Gender Non­Conforming People
Submitted by the Commission on Social Action of Reform Judaism
Background
Throughout the Reform Movement's history, we have worked tirelessly to fight discrimination, support
equality, and strengthen the rights of minorities and women. In 1977, both the Union for Reform
Judaism and the Central Conference of American Rabbis passed resolutions affirming "the rights of
homosexuals." We welcome and celebrate people of all sexual orientations in our congregations and
oppose laws that fail to uphold principles of equality for all. North American culture and society have,
in general, become increasingly accepting of people who are gay, lesbian and bisexual, yet too often
transgender and gender non­conforming individuals are forced to live as second­class citizens.
"Transgender" is a term for people whose gender identity, expression or behavior is different from
those typically associated with their assigned sex at birth. Gender non­conforming is a term for
individuals whose gender expression is different from societal expectations related to gender.
Although much work remains to be done to fully overcome discrimination against lesbian, gay and
bisexual people, members of the transgender and gender non­conforming communities face particular
ongoing legal and cultural bigotry and discrimination. Transgender individuals are often unable to
easily update their federal and state documents, such as passports and birth certificates, in order to
reflect their correct gender and name. Many states require proof of surgery or court orders to change
a person’s gender on identity documents. As a result, transgender individuals can be denied the right
to vote because their documents do not match their gender. Additionally, they experience frequent
incidents of hate crimes and harassment, and often face discrimination in employment, healthcare and
housing. Simply choosing their preferred pronoun or accessing facilities based on their gender identity
without facing others’ objections or fearing violence can be a challenge for transgender and gender
non­conforming individuals. The combined impact of all of these factors has contributed to higher than
average poverty, homelessness and suicide rates among transgender people.1
Efforts within the Reform Movement over the past decade reflect our commitment to greater
inclusivity of transgender and gender non­conforming people. In 2003, Hebrew Union College­Jewish
Institute of Religion admitted its first openly transgender rabbinical student. Recently, both NFTY and
URJ camps have taken steps to become more inclusive of transgender participants in their material,
application forms, facilities and programs. In 2015, the Central Conference of American Rabbis’
Rabbinical Placement Commission updated its policies to require that congregations and other
organizations seeking a rabbi commit to including in their search all candidates regardless of gender
identity. The Reform Movement has also built partnerships with organizations like Keshet
(www.keshetonline.org), to create and improve resources for our congregations, institutions, affiliates
and programs. Despite this important progress, there is more work to be done to make our Movement
and our society fully inclusive of transgender and gender non­conforming people.
Two key Reform responsa highlight the imperative toward full inclusion of transgender people in
accordance with Jewish tradition. A 1990 responsum (CCAR 5750.8) affirmed that being transgender
alone is not a basis to deny someone conversion to Judaism. A 1978 responsum affirmed that a rabbi
may officiate at the wedding of two Jews if one partner has transitioned to the gender with which they
identify, as opposed to the one they were assigned at birth ("Marriage After a Sex­change Operation"
in American Reform Responsa, Vol. LXXXVIII, 1978, pp. 52­54). These responsa reflect biblical
tradition that teaches us that all human beings are created b'tselem Elohim—in the Divine image. As it
says in Genesis 1:27, "And God created humans in God's image, in the image of God, God created
them." From this bedrock principle stems our commitment to defend any individual from the
http://urj.org/about/union/governance/reso/2015biennial/?syspage=article&item_id=118443&printable=1
1/2
10/7/2015
Resolution on the Rights of Transgender and Gender Non­Conforming People ­ URJ
discrimination that arises from ignorance, fear, insensitivity, or hatred. Knowing that members of the
transgender and gender non­conforming communities are often singled out for discrimination and even
violence, we are reminded of the Torah's injunction, "do not stand idly while your neighbor bleeds"
(Leviticus 19:16).
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Union for Reform Judaism:
1. >Affirms its commitment to the full equality, inclusion and acceptance of people of all gender
identities and gender expressions;
2. >Affirms the right of transgender and gender non­conforming individuals to be referred to by
their name, gender, and pronoun of preference in our congregations, camps, schools, and other
Reform affiliated organizations;
3. >Encourages Reform congregations, congregants, clergy, camps, institutions and affiliates,
including NFTY, to continue to advocate for the rights of people of all gender identities and
gender expressions;
4. >Urges the adoption and implementation of legislation and policies that prevent discrimination
based on gender identity and expression, and that require individuals to be treated equally
under the law as the gender by which they identify. This includes establishing the right to
change without undue burden their identification documents to reflect their gender and name
and ensuring equal access to medical and social services;
5. >Calls on the U.S. and Canadian governments at all levels to review and revise all laws and
policies to ensure full equality and protections for people of all gender identities and
expressions;
6. Urges Reform Movement institutions to begin or continue to work with local and national Jewish
transgender, lesbian, gay and bisexual organizations to create inclusive and welcoming
communities for people of all gender identities and expressions and to spread awareness and
increase knowledge of issues related to gender identity and expression. These activities may
include cultural competency trainings for religious school staff, the new congregational resource
guide on transgender inclusion being created by the Religious Action Center, education programs
on gender identity and expression, and sermons on the topic of gender identity and gender
expression;
7. Recommends URJ congregations and Reform Movement institutions, facilities and events ensure,
to the extent feasible, the availability of gender­neutral restrooms and other physical site needs
that ensure dignity and safety for transgender and gender non­conforming individuals;
8. Urges Reform Movement institutions to review their use of language in prayers, forms and
policies in an effort to ensure people of all gender identities and gender expressions are
welcomed, included, accepted and respected. This includes developing statements of inclusion
and/or non­discrimination policies pertaining to gender identity and gender expression, the use
when feasible of gender­neutral language, and offering more than two gender options or
eliminating the need to select a gender on forms; and
9. Will work in collaboration with other Reform Movement institutions to create ritual,
programmatic and educational materials that will empower such institutions to be more inclusive
and welcoming of people of all gender identities and expressions.
[1] http://transgenderlawcenter.org/archives/11393
Comments left on this website are monitored. By posting a comment you are in agreement with Terms & Conditions.
http://urj.org/about/union/governance/reso/2015biennial/?syspage=article&item_id=118443&printable=1
2/2