Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Recommendations NCCN, SIOG, SoFOG, etc. Etienne Brain, Brain MD MD, PhD Medical Oncology HÔPITAL RENÉ HUGUENIN Au 1er jjanvier 2010, le Centre René Huguenin g devient l’Hôpital René Huguenin, un établissement de soins, d’enseignement et de recherche de l’Institut Curie Guidelines • Meta Meta-Analyses Analyses • Trials • Evolving consensus – Saint-Gallen – NIH – NCCN – GEPOG/SoFOG SIOG • • • • • • • • • Anthracycline cardiotoxicity in the elderly cancer patient: a SIOG expert position paper. Aapro M, Bernard-Marty C, Brain E, et al. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:257-67 Management of prostate cancer in older men: recommendations of a working group of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology: Droz JP, Balducci L, Bolla M et al M, al. BJU Int Int. 2010; 106:462 106:462-9 9 EORTC Elderly Task Force and Lung Cancer Group and International Society for Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) experts' opinion for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in an elderly population. Pallis AG, Gridelli C, van Meerbeeck JP, et al. Ann Oncol 2010;21:692-706 T t Treatment t off the th elderly ld l colorectal l t l cancer patient: ti t SIOG expert recommendations. Papamichael D, Audisio R, Horiot JC, et al. Ann Oncol 2009;20:5-16 The medical treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer in the elderly: Position paper of a SIOG Taskforce. Bellmunt J, Négrier S, Escudier E, et al. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2009;69:64-72 PACE participants, Audisio RA et al. Shall we operate? Preoperative assessment in elderly cancer patients (PACE) can help. A SIOG surgical task force prospective study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2008;65:156-63 Wildiers H,, et al. Management g of breast cancer in elderlyy individuals: recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology. Lancet Oncol 2007;8:1101-15 Lichtman SM, Wildiers H, Chatelut E, et al. International Society of Geriatric Oncology Chemotherapy Taskforce: Evaluation of chemotherapy in older patients - An analysis of the medical literature. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(May): 18321832 43 Monfardini S, et al. Organization of the clinical activity of Geriatric Oncology: Report of a SIOG (International Society of Geriatric Oncology) task force. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 62:62-73, 2007 • • • • • • • • Launay-Vacher V, Chatelut E, et al. Renal insufficiency in elderly cancer patients: International Society of Geriatric Oncology clinical practice recommendations Ann Oncol 2007;18:1314-21 B d JJ Body JJ, C Coleman l R R, Clezardin Cl di P ett al. l IInternational t ti l society of geriatric oncology (SIOG) clinical practice recommendations for the use of bisphosphonates in elderly patients. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:852-8 Lichtman SM, et al. International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) recommendations for the adjustment of dosing in elderly cancer patients with renal insufficiency. Eur J Cancer 43:14-34, 2007 Surbone A, et al., on behalf of the SIOG Task Force on Cultural Competence in the Elderly. The illness trajectory of elderly cancer patients across cultures: SIOG position paper. Ann Oncol 18:633-8, 2007 Extermann M, et al. Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: Recommendations from the task force on CGA of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology . Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 55:241-52, 2005, 2007 Wedding g U. Elderly yp patients have become the leading g drug g consumers: it's high time to properly evaluate new drugs within the real targeted population. J Clin Oncol 24:62-3, 2006 (no abstract available) Audisio RA et al. The surgical management of elderly cancer patients: recommendations of the SIOG Surgical Task Force. Eur J Cancer 40:926-389, 40:926 389, 2004. Repetto L, et al. Use of growth factors in the elderly patient with cancer: a report from the second International Society for Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) 2001 meeting . Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 45:123-8, 2003 • G1 = “fit” • – No abnomaly – CIRSG – ≥ 1 ADL – Severe denutrition – (I)ADL normal – MNA normal – Standard treatment G2 “vulnérable” vulnérable (reversible) – CIRSG • MNA < 17 – Cognitive impairement • 15 < MMSE 24 – Desorientation, confusion – Symptomatic treatment ± specific actions • ≥ 1 grade 3 – ≥ 1 IADL – Risk for denutrition • 17 ≤ MNA < 24 – Standard treatment ± geriatric intervention – CIRSG • ≥ 2 grade 3 or • ≥ 1 grade 4 • g grade ≤ 2 • G3 “fragile” “f il ” (non reversible) • G4 – – – – Dependance, dementia Major comorbidities Terminal Palliative treatment 8 9 10 11 NCCN disease-specific • • • • • • • • • Bladder Breast CNS CRC H&N Kidney MM NSCLC P t t Prostate GEPOG/SoFOG • • • • Metastatic CRC A taste of "CGA » Patient involvement Social measures + denutrition / comorbidities • Fit: local treatment for liver M+ whenever possible with preop chemo; clinical trials • Intermediate: radiofrequency; evaluate potential resection w/ preop assessment; monochemo • Fragile: symptomatic treatment National French Recommendations for Chemotherapy Summary of previous recommendations Validated regimens 4 AC 6 CMF Options: TC 4 TC > 4 AC – Post hoc sub g group p analysis y in a randomized trial,, n ~ 80 Sequential regimen No data Reassuring data for safety profile of TC MC (liposomal doxorubicin) grade B grade C Systematically discuss primary prophylaxis w/ GCSF expert agreement 14