Download SIOG 2011 ms6_brain

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Recommendations
NCCN, SIOG, SoFOG, etc.
Etienne Brain,
Brain MD
MD, PhD
Medical Oncology
HÔPITAL RENÉ HUGUENIN
Au 1er jjanvier 2010, le Centre René Huguenin
g
devient l’Hôpital René Huguenin,
un établissement de soins, d’enseignement
et de recherche de l’Institut Curie
Guidelines
• Meta
Meta-Analyses
Analyses
• Trials
• Evolving consensus
– Saint-Gallen
– NIH
– NCCN
– GEPOG/SoFOG
SIOG
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Anthracycline cardiotoxicity in the elderly cancer patient: a
SIOG expert position paper. Aapro M, Bernard-Marty C,
Brain E, et al. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:257-67
Management of prostate cancer in older men:
recommendations of a working group of the International
Society of Geriatric Oncology: Droz JP, Balducci L, Bolla
M et al
M,
al. BJU Int
Int. 2010; 106:462
106:462-9
9
EORTC Elderly Task Force and Lung Cancer Group and
International Society for Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) experts'
opinion for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in
an elderly population. Pallis AG, Gridelli C, van Meerbeeck
JP, et al. Ann Oncol 2010;21:692-706
T t
Treatment
t off the
th elderly
ld l colorectal
l
t l cancer patient:
ti t SIOG
expert recommendations. Papamichael D, Audisio R,
Horiot JC, et al. Ann Oncol 2009;20:5-16
The medical treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer in the
elderly: Position paper of a SIOG Taskforce. Bellmunt J,
Négrier S, Escudier E, et al. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol
2009;69:64-72
PACE participants, Audisio RA et al. Shall we operate?
Preoperative assessment in elderly cancer patients
(PACE) can help. A SIOG surgical task force prospective
study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2008;65:156-63
Wildiers H,, et al. Management
g
of breast cancer in elderlyy
individuals: recommendations of the International Society
of Geriatric Oncology. Lancet Oncol 2007;8:1101-15
Lichtman SM, Wildiers H, Chatelut E, et al. International
Society of Geriatric Oncology Chemotherapy Taskforce:
Evaluation of chemotherapy in older patients - An analysis
of the medical literature. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(May): 18321832
43
Monfardini S, et al. Organization of the clinical activity of
Geriatric Oncology: Report of a SIOG (International Society
of Geriatric Oncology) task force. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol
62:62-73, 2007
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Launay-Vacher V, Chatelut E, et al. Renal insufficiency in
elderly cancer patients: International Society of Geriatric
Oncology clinical practice recommendations
Ann Oncol 2007;18:1314-21
B d JJ
Body
JJ, C
Coleman
l
R
R, Clezardin
Cl
di P ett al.
l IInternational
t
ti
l
society of geriatric oncology (SIOG) clinical practice
recommendations for the use of bisphosphonates in elderly
patients. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:852-8
Lichtman SM, et al. International Society of Geriatric
Oncology (SIOG) recommendations for the adjustment of
dosing in elderly cancer patients with renal insufficiency.
Eur J Cancer 43:14-34, 2007
Surbone A, et al., on behalf of the SIOG Task Force on
Cultural Competence in the Elderly. The illness trajectory
of elderly cancer patients across cultures: SIOG position
paper. Ann Oncol 18:633-8, 2007
Extermann M, et al. Use of comprehensive geriatric
assessment in older cancer patients: Recommendations
from the task force on CGA of the International Society of
Geriatric Oncology . Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 55:241-52,
2005, 2007
Wedding
g U. Elderly
yp
patients have become the leading
g drug
g
consumers: it's high time to properly evaluate new drugs
within the real targeted population.
J Clin Oncol 24:62-3, 2006 (no abstract available)
Audisio RA et al. The surgical management of elderly
cancer patients: recommendations of the SIOG Surgical
Task Force. Eur J Cancer 40:926-389,
40:926 389, 2004.
Repetto L, et al. Use of growth factors in the elderly patient
with cancer: a report from the second International Society
for Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) 2001 meeting . Crit Rev
Oncol Hematol 45:123-8, 2003
•
G1 = “fit”
•
– No abnomaly
– CIRSG
– ≥ 1 ADL
– Severe denutrition
– (I)ADL normal
– MNA normal
– Standard treatment
G2 “vulnérable”
vulnérable (reversible)
– CIRSG
• MNA < 17
– Cognitive impairement
• 15 < MMSE  24
– Desorientation, confusion
– Symptomatic treatment ±
specific actions
• ≥ 1 grade 3
– ≥ 1 IADL
– Risk for denutrition
• 17 ≤ MNA < 24
– Standard treatment ± geriatric
intervention
– CIRSG
• ≥ 2 grade 3 or
• ≥ 1 grade 4
• g
grade ≤ 2
•
G3 “fragile”
“f il ” (non reversible)
•
G4
–
–
–
–
Dependance, dementia
Major comorbidities
Terminal
Palliative treatment
8
9
10
11
NCCN disease-specific
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Bladder
Breast
CNS
CRC
H&N
Kidney
MM
NSCLC
P t t
Prostate
GEPOG/SoFOG
•
•
•
•
Metastatic CRC
A taste of "CGA »
Patient involvement
Social measures +
denutrition / comorbidities
• Fit: local treatment for
liver M+ whenever
possible with preop
chemo; clinical trials
• Intermediate:
radiofrequency; evaluate
potential resection w/
preop assessment;
monochemo
• Fragile: symptomatic
treatment
National French Recommendations for
Chemotherapy
 Summary of previous recommendations
Validated regimens
4
AC
 6 CMF
Options: TC
4
TC > 4 AC
– Post hoc sub g
group
p analysis
y in a randomized trial,, n ~ 80
 Sequential regimen
No data
 Reassuring data for safety profile of
TC
MC (liposomal doxorubicin)
grade B
grade C
 Systematically discuss primary prophylaxis w/ GCSF
expert agreement
14