Download File - Sarah Gray - Student Affairs in Higher Education

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Agenda

(1) Assignment Three
(2)
Readings from Week Five-Catch-up
(3) Readings from Week Six
Asian Students

Lee,S. (2010).
Article debunks myths about the Asian college students
as a monolithic population; in reality there is a lot of
diversity among Asian college students.
Lee

 Myths
 Asian students are whiz kids in college
 Model minority
 Reality
 True from some Asian groups like Japanese,
Koreans, and Chinese, some Vietnamese from the
elite strata
 Not True for the Hmong which was a minority
group in Vietnam and Laos.
Wang’s
Asian Americans in Higher
Education

 The 1852 Gold Rush and the Transcontinental railroad
were two events that helped spark large waves of
Chinese immigration to the US. During the 1852 Gold
Rush, many Chinese came to the country to work in the
gold mines in California.
 The 1869 Transcontinental railroad was officially
connected. This new linkage connected the eastern and
western parts of US. Chinese laborers played a major
role in helping to build the railroad.
The Chinese Puzzle
1882 Chinese Exclusion
Act
 This act provided an absolute
10-year moratorium on Chinese
labor immigration. For the 
first time, Federal law proscribed
entry of an ethnic working group on the premise that it
endangered the good order of certain localities.
 The act required that immigrants obtain certification from the
Chinese government that they were qualified to immigrate.
But this group found it increasingly difficult to prove that
they were not laborers because the 1882 act defined
excludable as “skilled and unskilled laborers and Chinese
employed in mining.” Thus very few Chinese could enter the
country under the 1882 law.
 The 1882 exclusion act also placed new requirements on
Chinese who had already entered the country. If they left the
United States, they had to obtain certifications to re-enter.
Congress, moreover, refused State and Federal courts the
right to grant citizenship to Chinese resident aliens, although
these courts could still deport them.
Discrimination

 Asian Americans were systematically excluded from
public education and higher education during earlier
periods of American life.
 Some institutions placed an emphasis on attracting
international Asian students while ignoring American
born Asian students.
Access and Exclusion

Students had limited choices influences shaped by
finances, gender, and race and geography.
Latino Students

Tudico,C. (2010). Beyond Black and White.
The heart of the article focuses on a perspective that Latino
Voice should be added to the discussion of American
Higher Education. The author believes that higher
education is viewed in a black and white context.
Tudico

Notes
(1) Author suggested that the presence of
Hispanophobia has caused the Latino Voice to be
missing in the higher education literature.
Hispanophobia is defined as the “historical
profession’s neglect and outright bias concerning
the history of largely Roman Catholic Spanish
peoples and institutions.
“Diversity” Within

(2) Californios compared to Mestizo have had
Different experiences attending and graduating
from college. The former are defined as
Mexican Americans who were predominately
the descendants of the Spaniards. Mestizos are
the descendants of the Spanish and Native
tribes.
College Administration &
Finances

Two sources of philanthropy: (1)Organizations and
(2)Individuals.
Organizations/Foundations
American Missionary Association
Peabody Education Trust
Individuals
Matthew Vassar
Interregional Philanthropy

 American Missionary Association helped develop
Liberal Colleges in the West and private HBCUs.
 Support for development of majority white and
historically black institutions in the South.
Stakeholders
Institutional

leaders
(trustees,
presidents)
Intellectual
interests of
faculty
Other Forces Impacting the
Undergraduate Curriculum

Emergence of the Research institution
Community Colleges
Ellis Island
Thelin
Captain of Industry &

Erudition
Abstract
The thrust of the chapter focuses on how the historical
conditions at end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th
century impacted university transformation. Also, the
author examined the criteria to determine exceptional
universities in different parts of the country.lFinally,
author examined how industrial and intellectual leadership
impacted institutions
Association of American

Universities
AAU
AAU: http://www.aau.edu/
The Association of American Universities (AAU) is a
nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization of 61 leading public and
private research universities in the United States and
Canada. Founded in 1900 to advance the international
standing of U.S. research universities.
Charter Institutions














Harvard
John Hopkins
Columbia
University of Chicago
University of California
Clark University
Cornell
Michigan
Stanford
Wisconsin
University of Penn
Princeton
Yale
1)
Observations
of the characteristics of this
What are your impressions
list?
2) What institutions on the list are still considered
exemplary?
Quest for the Great
American University

Overlapping trends: Captains of Industry and Captains
of Erudition.
Describe the era of major corporations developing
around the country like Carnegie Steel, Sanford Oil
Company, and Hilton. In higher education, major
universities emerged during this time period.
Transformational leadership is the key link between
the development of the industrial and higher education
sectors.
Factors shaping rise

 Industrial development and discretionary wealth
 Religion
 Gospel of Wealth
University Presidents:
Key Characteristics

(1) Long tenure in office
(2) Aware of key political events
(3)Excellent fundraisers
Characteristics of Great
Universities

 Philanthropy on large scale
 Presidential presence
 Professors as experts
 Pedagogy
 Curriculum
 Professional schools
 Professionalization of students
 Dynamics of Academic enterprise
Professional Schools

1) University builders didn’t establish connection
between undergraduate and professional
organizations.
2) Funding major challenge for organizations in
higher education.
Professional Schools:
Success Stories

 Agricultural
 Mining
 Civic Engineering
 Forerunners of ROTC
Query

 What impact did Land grant institutions have on
Federal and State government?
Structure and Resources

 Established Department of Agriculture
 Interior Department
 War Department
The three departments brought resources to Land
Grants.
Campus Life

Before 1890
 Small size of
institutions
 Simplicity in mission
and function
 Generalist faculty
After 1890
 Emergence or larger
institutions due to
physical plant, student
body, and size of faculty.
 General academic mission
with multiple
undergraduate and
graduate programs.
 Faculty specialization
Public Accountability:
1890-1900

Query: What are the reasons that higher education was
viewed as being unregulated?
Hawthorne, E. (1997) Institutional Contexts

Abstract
 Curriculum is how faculty organize what we teach,
how [pedagogy] teach, and to whom [characteristics].
 Goal of the article is to examine the different factors of
institutional contexts impacting curriculum
development at different institutions.
Underlying Currents

Six significant underlying currents have influenced different
groups to create the diversity of curriculum in American
higher education. The currents are:
 Two opposing views of human nature
 Religion and religious values
 Application of knowledge and the aspirations to generate
knowledge
 Pragmatic and diverse nature of Americans
 Local interests played major roles in the development of
curriculum and institutions.
 Currents emerged due to the actions of internal and external
stakeholders.
Query

What are some internal and external stakeholders that
influence American higher education?
Stakeholders
Institutional

leaders
(trustees,
presidents)
Intellectual
interests of
faculty
Student and the
Curriculum

Students help shape the curriculum in three ways:
1.
Student demands for relevance in the curriculum during the
sixties, seventies, eighties, nineties, and 21st century. What
forces helped shape the student movements to impact the
curriculum?
 BGS, i.e. alternative BA/BS degree curriculum configurations that
emerged.
 Afro History departments at different majority white institutions
 Women Studies departments
 Latino Studies
 Native American or First Nation Studies
 Asian American Studies
 GLBT Studies
Student and the
Curriculum

2.
Students developing new interests outside of the
regular curriculum
3.
Development of special curriculum
Other forces impacting the
undergraduate curriculum

Emergence of the Research Institution
Community Colleges
Community College
Mission

 The original mission and current mission are quite different.
 Originally, the junior college role was to help students gain the
first two years of college. The institutions attracted students
from higher socioeconomic backgrounds.
 Later, they emerged into institutions whose primary access
mission was remedial education.
 Currently, community colleges attract more underacademically prepared students from lower socioeconomic
backgrounds.
Curriculum as Social
Construction

What do we mean by social construction?
Social constructionism “Social constructionism is a general term sometimes
applied to theories that emphasize the socially created nature of social life.
Of course, in one sense all sociologists would argue this, so the term can
easily become devoid of meaning. More specifically, however, the
emphasis on social constructionism is usually traced back at least to the
work of William Isaac Thomas and the Chicago sociologists, as well as the
phenomenological sociologists and philosophers such as Alfred Schutz.
Such approaches emphasize the idea that society is actively and creatively
produced by human beings. They portray the world as made or invented–
rather than merely given or taken for granted. Social worlds are
interpretive nets woven by individuals and groups.”
A Dictionary of Sociology | 1998 | GORDON MARSHAL
Levine, A. and Nidiffer (1997). Key Turning
Points in the Evolving Curriculum.

 Abstract
 We have two major goals in this chapter:
 First, authors seek to provide a 400-year overview
curriculum at different institutions of higher education.
 Second, the authors examine the cumulative impact of
the evolving curriculum on American higher education.
Key points

 Post modernism philosophical current impact on the emerging German
research university.
 How intellectuals perceived the nature of knowledge:

from something that was divinely revealed with perhaps the nature of
knowledge

from something that was divinely revealed with perhaps magical qualities to
something to be discovered based on empiricism.
 Questions:

What do we mean by empiricism?

What impact did post-modernism have on the development of German
University?
Key points

 Emerging German research university’s:
 Admission criteria
 Earlier admission criteria took the form of institutions seeking
intellectually most capable, not because of social standing.
 American trained scholars from German institutions replicate
their training in American colleges and universities.
 Focus on graduate education, not undergraduate education
 Shifting faculty role from teaching to research
 Cementing roles of research, teaching, and service
Emergence of multiple meanings
of being a “college graduate”

1)
Development of intellectual skills to absorb
knowledge
2)
Downplaying moral development
3)
Career and life enhancement
Q/A

Carnegie Classication

 Carnegie Classication is a typology of the
different types of higher education
institutions today. In 1973The Carnegie
Foundation of Teaching established the
initial conceptualization of the typology.
Since 1973, the typology has been revised
several times. The 2005 version is the one
we should refer to in the program:
http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.o
rg/descriptions/basic.php

Institutional Type
Associate Colleges

Associate's Colleges. Includes institutions where
all degrees are at the associate's level, or where
bachelor's degrees account for less than 10
percent of all undergraduate degrees. Excludes
institutions eligible for classification as Tribal
Colleges or Special Focus Institutions
Doctorate-granting
Universities

Doctorate-granting Universities. Includes
institutions that awarded at least 20 research
doctoral degrees during the update year
(excluding doctoral-level degrees that qualify
recipients for entry into professional practice,
such as the JD, MD, PharmD, DPT, etc.).
Excludes Special Focus Institutions and Tribal
Colleges.
Master's Colleges and
Universities

Master's Colleges and Universities. Generally
includes institutions that awarded at least 50
master's degrees and fewer than 20 doctoral
degrees during the update year (with
occasional exceptions – see Methodology).
Excludes Special Focus Institutions and Tribal
Colleges.
Baccalaureate Colleges
Baccalaureate Colleges. Includes institutions
 represent at least
where baccalaureate degrees
10 percent of all undergraduate degrees and
where fewer than 50 master's degrees or 20
doctoral degrees were awarded during the
update year. (Some institutions above the
master's degree threshold are also included; see
Methodology.) Excludes Special Focus
Institutions and Tribal Colleges.
Special Focus
Institutions

Special Focus Institutions. Institutions
awarding baccalaureate or higher-level degrees
where a high concentration of degrees (above
75%) is in a single field or set of related fields.
Excludes Tribal Colleges.
Tribal Colleges

Tribal Colleges. Colleges and universities
that are members of the American Indian
Higher Education Consortium, as identified
in IPEDS Institutional Characteristics.
Horizontal Perspectives

Importance of paying attention to your
institutions preference affiliations with peer
institutions.
Association American
Universities
AAU

http://www.aau.edu/about/default.aspx?id=58

AMERICAN
ASSOCIATION OF STATE
COLLEGES AND
UNIVERSITIES
http://www.aascu.org/
American Association of
Community Colleges

http://www.aacc.nche.edu/Pages/default.aspx

The National Association for
Equal Opportunity in
Higher Education (NAFEO)
http://www.nafeo.org/community/web2010/about.html
American Indian Higher
Education Consortium

http://www.aihec.org/
THE HISPANIC ASSOCIATION OF
COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES
(HACU)

HACU was established in 1986 with a founding
membership of eighteen institutions. Because of HACU’s
exemplary leadership on behalf of the nation’s youngest
and fastest-growing population, the Association rapidly
grew in numbers and national impact.
Thelin
Chapter Five

Alma Mater
The Collegiate Ideal

 Hortio Alger strata of society especially those
considered “new money” wanted their sons to attend
an elite institution in order to sustain and enhance
their social status.
 College going became fashionable and prestigious at
the end of the 19th century.
 Tension between Liberal arts and universities.
 Institutional age not modernity established
institutional prestige.
Collegiate Celebrations

Collegiate Celebrations

 Between 1890-1910 Americans began highly
interested in college attendance.
 Professors lived a very meager life.
 Brand loyalty developed symbolized in school
mascots.
 Institutional prestige and athletic programs:
Early tension between academic values and
athletes’ uneven background
Student Subcultures

Undergraduates in the
Gothic Age

 What were the identified student
subcultures on college campuses during this
era?
 How did the dominant subculture shape the
student culture?
Access and Affordability

 The intersection between access, financial aid,
and affordability connection.
 Academic preparation and retention impact
on college attendance.
 White males were the preferred type of
student at many institutions.
 Socio economic make-up of colleges.
 Anti-Semitism in college admission
Intercollegiate Sports

 Emergence of football on college campuses.
 Impact of football on connecting students,
faculty, alumni, and community around the
institution.
 Emergence of the tail wags the dog or the dog
wags the tail.
 Unevenness in athletes' background.
Women’s College

 Women’s college and college women
successful features of American higher
education between 1880 -1920.
 Student subcultures and women’s colleges.
 Career and life options for women
Women and Coeducation

 Academic integration.
 Restricted career options for women.
 Co-curriculum system and women.
Collegiate Ideal and Black
Colleges

 Different academic missions for public and
private HBCUs.
 Career options for graduates for black
college graduates.
 Campus life
Missing in the review about
African American college students.

African American students attended and graduated from
TWIs during this era.
Indiana University- Marcus Neal 1895 and Frances
Marshall 1919.
Blanche Keteen Bruce graduated from KU in 1885
Omitted in Thelin’s
books

Latino and Asian students’ experiences not
described and examined in Thelin’s chapter.
Excesses of College Life

 Emerging influence of undergraduates and
alumni on institutions’ decisions.
 Criteria for determining student’s place in the
dominant student subculture.
 Presence and influence of other student
subcultures.
 College graduates and national political
leadership
The Curriculum/Selective
Admissions

1)
What are your impression about the the
intersection between collegiate culture,
curriculum, and performance?
2) What factors did institutions make use of to
select students to their campuses?
3) What factors caused the rise of Student Affairs?
WWI/Colleges

 Military expansion and enrollment.
 Uneven impact of militarization of the
curriculum.
 Development of Memorial Student Unions

Q/A
Next Class…

3/4 Research Day (no class)
3/11 Spring Break (no class)
3/18 Growth in the Higher Education System
Thelin, Chapter 6 Success and Excess: Expansions and
Reforms
*Group #3CIHR discussion