* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 11 the journal of social science scholar
Survey
Document related concepts
Cambridge capital controversy wikipedia , lookup
Productive and unproductive labour wikipedia , lookup
History of economic thought wikipedia , lookup
Marxian economics wikipedia , lookup
Commodity fetishism wikipedia , lookup
Criticisms of the labour theory of value wikipedia , lookup
Socialist economics wikipedia , lookup
Surplus value wikipedia , lookup
Reproduction (economics) wikipedia , lookup
Economic calculation problem wikipedia , lookup
Socialist calculation debate wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
www.ssresearcher.com ISSN 2321-8266 T HE J OU R N AL OF S OC I A L S C I E N C E SC H OL AR FSSR www.ssresearcher.com APRIL 2013 VOLUME I NO I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THROUGH CAPITALISM, EXAMPLES FROM FIRST WORLD COUNTRIES IN ASIA MR.SWAPAN DATTA RESEARCH SCHOLAR KALYANI UNIVERSITY KALYANI WEST BENGAL ABSTRACT Capitalism is an economic system that is based on private ownership of the means of production and the creation of goods or services for profit. Other elements central to capitalism include competitive markets, wage labor and capital accumulation. There are multiple variants of capitalism, including laisser-faire, welfare capitalism and state capitalism .Capitalism is considered to have been applied in a variety of historical cases, varying in time, geography, politics, and culture. There is general agreement that capitalism became dominant in the Western world following the demise of feudalism. Competitive markets may also be found in marketbased alternatives to capitalism such as market socialism and co-operative economics. KEY-WORDS: Capitalism, Economic, Classification, Development. Economists, political economists and historians have taken different perspectives on the analysis of capitalism. Economists usually emphasize the degree to which government does not have control over markets (Laissez Faire), as well as the importance of property rights .Most political economists emphasize private property as well, in addition to power relations, wage labor, class, and the uniqueness of capitalism as a historical formation. The extent to which different markets are free, as well as the rules defining private property, is a matter of politics and policy. Many 11 THE JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE SCHOLAR APRIL 2013 www.ssresearcher.com ISSN 2321-8266 states have what are termed mixed economies, referring to the varying degree of planned and market-driven elements in a state’s economic system. A number of political ideologies have emerged in support of various types of capitalism, the most prominent being economic liberalism. Capitalism is defined as a social and economic system where capital assets are mainly owned and controlled by private persons, where labor is purchased for money wages, capital gains accrue to private owners, and the price mechanism is utilized to allocate capital goods between uses. The extent to which the price mechanism is used, the degree of competitiveness and government intervention in markets distinguish exact forms of capitalism. There are different variations of capitalism which have different relationships to markets and the state. In free-market and Lassiez-faire forms if capitalism, markets are utilized most extensively with minimal or no regulation over the pricing mechanism. In interventionist and mixed economies, markets continue to play a dominant role but are regulated to some extent by government in order to correct market failures and to promote social welfare. In state capitalist systems, markets are relied upon the least, with the state relying heavily on state –owned enterprises or indirect economic planning to accumulate capital. Capitalism and capitalist economics is generally considered to be the opposite of socialism, which contrasts with all forms of capitalism in the following ways: social ownership of the means of production, where returns on the means of production accrue to society at large, and goods and services are produced directly for their utility (as opposed to being produced by profitseeking businesses). MONEY, CAPITAL AND ACCUMULATION Money was primarily a standardized medium of exchange, and final means of payment, that serves to measure the value of all goods and commodities in a standard of value. It is an abstraction of economic value and medium of exchange that eliminates the cumbersome system of barter by separating the transactions involved in the exchange of products, thus greatly facilitating specialization and trade through encouraging the exchange of commodities. Capitalism involves the further abstraction of money into exchangeable assets and the accumulation of money through ownership, exchange, interest and various other financial instruments. Capital in this sense refers to money used to buy something only in order to sell it again to realize a financial profit. The accumulation of capital refers to the process of making money or growing an initial sum of money through investment in production. Capitalism is based around the accumulation of capital, whereby financial capital is invested in order to realize a profit and then reinvested into 12 THE JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE SCHOLAR APRIL 2013 www.ssresearcher.com ISSN 2321-8266 further production in a continuous process of accumulation . In Marxian economic theory, this dynamic is called the law of value. CAPITAL AND FINANCIAL MARKETS The defining feature of capitalist markets, in contrast to markets and exchange in pre-capitalist societies like feudalism, is the existence of a markets for capital goods (the means of productions), meaning exchange –relations (business relationships) exist within the productions process. Additionally, capitalism features a market for labor. This distinguishes the capitalist market from pre-capitalist societies which generally only contained market exchange for final goods and secondary goods .The “market” in capitalism refers to capital markets and financial markets. Capitalism is the system of raising, conserving and spending a set monetary value in a specified market. There are three main markets in a basic capitalistic economy: labor, goods and services, and financial. Labor markets (people) make products and get paid for work by the goods and services market (companies, firms, or corporations, etc.) which then sells the products back to the laborers. However, both of the first two markets pay into and receive benefits from the financial market, which handles and regulates the actual money in the economic system. This includes banks, credit-unions, stock exchanges, etc. From a monetary standpoint, governments control just how much money is in circulation worldwide, which plays an immense role on how money is spent in one’s own country. WAGE LABOR AND CLASS STRUCTURE Wage labor refers to the class-structure of capitalism, whereby workers receive either a wage or a salary, and owners who supply financial capital receive the profits generated by the factors of production employed in the production of economic value. Capitalists are individuals who possess and supply financial capital to productive ventures and thus become the owners of the means of producing economic value, either jointly (as shareholders) or individually.”Capitalists” refers to the class who own the factors of production and derive an income based on capital gains (profit, interest or rent, also called surplus value), which is created by workers using the factors of production. Capitalists may take the form of investors, shareholders or venture capitalists. “Workers” includes those who expend both manual and mental (or creative) labor in production, where production does not simply mean physical production but refers to the production of both tangible and intangible economic value. A capitalist is an individual who supplies capital to a business venture and derives his or her income on the return on his or her investment. Labor includes all physical and mental human resources, including entrepreneurial capacity and management skills, which are needed to produce products and services. Production is the act of making products or services by applying labor power to the means of production. 13 THE JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE SCHOLAR APRIL 2013 www.ssresearcher.com ISSN 2321-8266 TYPES OF CAPITALISM There are many variants of capitalism in existence that differ according to country and region. They vary in their institutional makeup and by their economic policies. The common features among all the different forms of capitalism is that they are based on the production of goods and services for profit, predominately market-based allocation of resources, and they are structured upon the accumulation of capital. The major forms of capitalism are listed below: 1. MERCANTILISM-Mercantilism is a nationalist form of early capitalism that came into existence approximately in the late 16th century. It is characterized by the intertwining of national business interests to state-interest and imperialism, and consequently, the state apparatus is utilized to advance national business interests abroad. An example of this is colonists living in America who were only allowed to trade with and purchase goods from their respective mother countries (Britain, France, etc.). Mercantilism holds that the wealth of a nation is increased through a positive balance of trade with other nations, and corresponds to the phase of capitalist development called the Primitive accumulation of capital. 2. FREE-MARKET CAPITALISM-Free-market capitalism refers to an economic system where prices for goods and services are set freely by the forces of supply and demand and are allowed to reach their point of equilibrium without intervention by government policy. It typically entails support for highly-competitive markets, private ownership of productive enterprises. Laissez-faire is a more extensive form of free-market capitalism where the role of the state is limited to protecting property rights. 3. STATE CAPITALISM-State capitalism consists of state ownership of the production within a state .The debate between proponents if private versus state capitalism is centered on questions of managerial efficacy, productive efficiency, and fair distribution of wealth. According to Aldo Musacchio, a professor at Harvard Business School, it is a system in which governments, whether democratic or autocratic, exercise a widespread influence on the economy, through either direct ownership or various subsidies. Musacchio also emphasizes the difference between today’s state capitalism and its predecessors. Gone are the days when governments appointed bureaucrats to run companies. The world’s largest state-owned enterprises are traded on the public markets and kept in good health by large institutional investors. 4. CORPORATE CAPITALISM-Corporate capitalism is a free or mixed-market economy characterized by the dominance of hierarchical, bureaucratic corporations, which are legally required to pursue profit.State-monopoly capitalism was originally a Marxist concept referring to a form of corporate capitalism in which state policy is utilized to benefit and promote the interests of dominant or established corporations by shielding them from competitive pressures or by providing them with subsidies. 14 THE JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE SCHOLAR APRIL 2013 www.ssresearcher.com ISSN 2321-8266 Critics of capitalism associate it with: social inequality and unfair distribution of wealth and power; a tendency toward market monopoly or oligopoly (and government by oligarchy); imperialism, counter-revolutionary wars and various forms of economic and cultural exploitation; materialism; repression of workers and trade unionists; social alienation; economic inequality; unemployment; and economic instability. Individual property rights have also been associated with the tragedy of the anti commons. Notable critics of capitalism have included: socialists, anarchists, communists, national socialists, social democrats, technocrats, and some types of conservatives, Luddites, Narodniks, Shakers and some types of nationalists. CONCLUSION Marxists have advocated a revolutionary overthrow of capitalism that would lead to socialism, before eventually transforming into communism. Many socialists consider capitalism to be irrational, in that production and the direction of the economy are unplanned, creating many inconsistencies and internal contradictions. Labor historians and scholars such as Immanuel Wallerstein have argued that free labor- by slaves, indentured servants, prisoners, and other coerced persons-is compatible with capitalist relations. Many aspects of capitalism have come under attack from the anti-globalization movement, which is primarily opposed to corporate capitalism, Environmentalists have argued that capitalism requires continual economic growth, and that it will inevitable deplete the finite natural resources of the Earth. Many religions have criticized or opposed specific elements of capitalism. Traditional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam forbid lending money at interest, although alternative methods of banking have been developed. Some Christians have criticized capitalism for its materialist aspects and its inability to account for the wellbeing of all people. Many of Jesus’s parables deal with clearly economic concerns: farming, shepherding, being in debt, doing hard labor, being excluded from banquets and the houses of the rich, and have implications for wealth and power distribution. REFERENCES 1. Joseph E. Stiglitz (2000) : Economics of the Public Sector, 3rd edition, Chapter 4. 2. Laffont, J.J. (1987):" The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, externalities" 3. pp. 263–65. 4. Blaug, Mark (2007): The New Encyclopedia Britannica "The Social Sciences:Economics", pp. 347, Chicago. 15 THE JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE SCHOLAR APRIL 2013 www.ssresearcher.com ISSN 2321-8266 5. Kneese, Allen K., and Clifford S. Russell (1987): The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics "environmental economics,Volume- 2, pp. 159–64 6. Groenewegen, Peter (2008): The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics "division of labour". 7.Cameron, Rondo (1993): A Concise Economic History of the World: From Paleolithic Times to the Present, Oxford, pp. 25, 32, 276–80. 16 THE JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE SCHOLAR APRIL 2013