Download Extending battery life in smart locks

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Induction motor wikipedia , lookup

Power over Ethernet wikipedia , lookup

Power inverter wikipedia , lookup

Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup

Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup

History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup

Brushed DC electric motor wikipedia , lookup

Electric power system wikipedia , lookup

Audio power wikipedia , lookup

Stepper motor wikipedia , lookup

Electric battery wikipedia , lookup

Standby power wikipedia , lookup

Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup

Metadyne wikipedia , lookup

Wireless power transfer wikipedia , lookup

Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup

Electrification wikipedia , lookup

Amtrak's 25 Hz traction power system wikipedia , lookup

Power engineering wikipedia , lookup

Distribution management system wikipedia , lookup

Power electronics wikipedia , lookup

Rechargeable battery wikipedia , lookup

Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup

Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup

Alternating current wikipedia , lookup

AC adapter wikipedia , lookup

Buck converter wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Extending battery life
in smart locks
Chris Glaser
Member Group Technical Staff, Applications Engineer
Low Power DC/DC
Texas Instruments
Aramis P. Alvarez
Applications Engineer
Building Automation
Texas Instruments
New smart lock power architectures greatly
increase battery life by reducing system standby
power consumption.
Power management is a key design challenge in every Internet of Things (IoT) and
connected home product. If the consumer experiences product downtime due to dead
batteries or gets tired of changing the batteries too frequently, they will likely choose to
not use the product. This is especially true for smart locks. When a lock malfunctions,
the result is frustration from being locked out of the office or hotel room.
In addition to the relatively high peak current demands of the radio, common in all
IoT applications, smart locks have an additional high peak current demand from the
motor which turns the lock itself. Also, smart locks sit idle for the vast majority of
every day—the time when they are actively locking or unlocking the door is very small.
This combination of high peak current demands and very lengthy, low-power system
standby time demands new power architectures to extend the battery life.
System overview
Wireless microcontroller
While smart lock systems may contain many
In a smart lock product, the wireless microcontroller
integrated circuits (ICs) such as light-emitting diode
(MCU) device communicates with the phone to
®
(LED) drivers, Wi-Fi communications, and so on,
lock and unlock the door wirelessly. In order to
this paper focuses specifically on these three ICs:
do this without any noticeable lag, the wireless
microcontroller needs to be powered on to send an
1) microcontroller with wireless connectivity, such
advertising event signal periodically, and then be put
as Bluetooth® low energy;
back into its standby state. Current consumption is
2) a motor driver; and
much lower in standby—usually around the single-
3) power management.
digit micro-amp (µA) range. Such a low current
Throughout this paper, the term “events” refers to
enables long battery life.
the door locking or unlocking when the motor is
Advertising events (not to be confused with the
active. For example, locking the front door and then
locking/unlocking events) occur when the wireless
unlocking the front door counts as two separate
microcontroller periodically wakes up to briefly
events. Twenty-four events per day is commonly
transmit identifying information and listen for
used for comparing the performance of different
incoming connection requests from peer devices
smart locks.
(e.g., a smart phone). The period of advertising
events is programmable on most Bluetooth low
energy devices from 20 ms to 10.24 seconds.
Extending battery life in smart locks
2
November 2016
ure 1
6.1mA
Advertising
Event
Advertising
Event
Advertising
Event
Advertising
Event
Advertising
Event
1.2μA
Figure 1. Current consumption versus time during a Bluetooth low energy advertising event.
The longer the period, the longer it takes for a
key. The current profile of the motor is different
connection but the lower the power consumption.
for each type of door lock, because the amount
A period of 500 ms between advertising events
of torque needed to turn the lock differs between
is a good balance between power consumption
different brands of door locks. On many locks, the
and connection speed. Figure 1 shows the
current through the motor ramps up and peaks at
current consumption waveform of a typical
around one amp. There are a number of sources of
wireless microcontroller with Bluetooth low energy
power dissipation in a motor driver, but the biggest
communication
[1]
. Default values for the CC2640
source is the on-resistance of its MOSFETs. When
current consumptions are shown in Figure 1. The
choosing a motor driver, the highest efficiency is
pie graphs and plots in Figure 6 and Figure 7 (see
achieved with a very low on-resistance. The motor
page 6) use the worst-case scenario of 9.1 mA of
driver, such as a DRV8833, must work with the
active current and 2.5 µA of standby current. These
smart lock’s power source and the specific motor
values are used for maximum output power.
used. Considering both of these, the motor driver
Since the advertising event period is programmable,
voltage is typically around 5 V.
the two most important values to look for when
Power management
choosing a Bluetooth low energy radio, in terms
Power management is required to convert the
of power consumption, are active (during an
varying battery voltage to the voltages required
advertising event) and standby currents. The supply
by each of the loads: wireless microcontroller,
voltage range of the SimpleLink™ Bluetooth low
motor driver and any other sub-systems. Power
energy CC2640 wireless MCU is 1.8 V to 3.8 V. In
management adds cost, size and inefficiency to the
this application note 2.5 V will be used to allow easy
system. Thus, it is important to design the entire
comparison between the different configurations.
system with the power management in mind—the
Motor
power management must work together with
All smart lock products need a motor and motor
each sub-system.
driver in order to turn the lock in either direction
The power management’s efficiency is critical to the
(lock and unlock) wirelessly and without a physical
Extending battery life in smart locks
performance of the overall system, especially in an
3
November 2016
IoT application such as a smart lock. This efficiency
Any LDO converting 5 V to 2.5 V is 50 percent
is important at the full system load with motor
efficient at best, with much lower efficiency obtained
turning and wireless microcontroller connecting,
in standby-mode due to the LDO’s quiescent
but critical when the system is in standby-mode—
current (sometimes called ground current) [3]. For
drawing micro amps (µA) of current. Being efficient
example, the TPS76625 is suitable to convert
at both light and heavy loads is challenging and
four AA batteries to 2.5 V. This device achieves
requires specially-designed ICs.
50 percent efficiency at higher loads, but only two
The power management must ultimately run off of
percent efficiency at the 1.2 µA standby load due to
its 35-µA quiescent current. The very low efficiency
the user-installed batteries. The choice of battery
results in relatively high power consumption when
type, number and configuration goes hand-in-hand
the smart lock is in standby—this reduces battery
with the system’s power architecture and power
life. Figure 2 shows a typical block diagram of an
management selection. AA-size alkaline batteries
LDO-based system.
are widely used in smart locks due to their wide
availability to consumers and low cost. The average
LDO full-load efficiency
ηLDO1 = 50%
per-cell voltage of an AA cell is around 1.25 V,
AA
though their voltage varies from under 1 V when fully
2.5 V
Wireless
Microcontroller
AA
discharged to 1.6 V when brand new. With four AA
Power
Management
LDO
5V
AA
cells, over four years of battery life is achieved [2].
AA
Whereas many existing smart locks focus on
LDO standby efficiency
ηLDO2 = 2%
achieving lowest-cost power management with
Motor Driver
with Motor
4s1p
low drop-out (LDO) linear regulators—at the
expense of efficiency—newer, cost-effective power
Motor driver efficiency
ηMD = 100%
management more than doubles the battery life with
Figure 2. Smart lock block diagram using an LDO and four AA cells
connected in series.
minimal added cost. Switching DC/DC converters,
both boost (sometimes called a step-up) and buck
(sometimes called a step-down) converters, offer
higher efficiency and a corresponding longer battery
Boost converter
life compared to LDO implementations.
To overcome the LDO’s low efficiency in standby-
Linear regulator
mode, the battery configuration is rearranged and
a boost converter is used instead. In this power
The four AA batteries are connected as 4s1p (four
architecture, the wireless MCU connects directly to
series cells and one parallel cell) to create a 5-V
the battery pack, which is arranged as a 2s2p (two
supply voltage to power the motor. Now, only a
series and two parallel cells). Since four cells are
simple motor driver is needed to turn the motor
still used, the cost and energy are the same as the
on or off without any added power management.
previous case. But since there are only two cells in
Because of this, the motor sub-system operates at
series, the total battery pack voltage is just 2.5 V—a
nearly 100 percent efficiency.
perfect match for the wireless MCU. Now, this
LDOs step down the higher battery voltage to lower
connection is 100 percent efficient.
voltages. An LDO is used to convert the 5-V battery
However, the motor still requires 5 V to operate.
to the 2.5 V required by the wireless microcontroller.
Extending battery life in smart locks
From the 2.5-V battery, a boost converter must
4
November 2016
be used. A typical boost converter, such as the
directly to the battery pack. Figure 4 shows a
TPS61030, has around 85 percent efficiency when
typical block diagram of a buck-based system.
boosting to drive a motor. Due to the efficiency and
A standard buck converter has a relatively large
boost ratio (where the output voltage is greater than
quiescent current (IQ). The high IQ dramatically
the input voltage), the boost converter draws very
decreases efficiency in standby-mode as it did
high currents from the battery which increases the
with the LDO [3]. However, the ultra-low power
losses. Figure 3 shows a typical block diagram of a
buck converter used in this example has ultra-low
boost-based system.
AA
AA
TPS62745, TPS627451
2.5 V
IQ specifically designed for IoT applications, which
have higher peak currents and long system standby
times. Figure 5 shows that the ultra-low IQ enables
www.ti.com
Wireless
over 67 percent efficiency at the typical standby-
AA
AA
SLVSC68A – JUNE 2015 – REVISED
JUNE 2015
Microcontroller
9.2.3 Application Curves
Microcontroller with
mode load currents with a 2.5-V output voltage.
BLE efficiency
ηBLE = 100%
2s2p
100
90
Power
Management
Boost
80
100
90
5V
Motor Driver
with Motor
80
70
Efficiency (%)
Efficiency (%)
70
Boost full-load efficiency
ηBoost = 85%
60
50
Figure 3. Smart lock block diagram using a boost converter and four
40 cells connected as 2s2p.
AA
V = 4.0V
IN
30
20
10
system, a buck
10
0
1
100
1m
10m
100m
Output Current
(A) in place of theD001
converter
is used
LDO to dramatically increase the efficiency. At
such as a TPS62745, is 90 percent
10m
100m
D002
100
100 percent efficiency because it is connected
60
The 60
efficiency of the power architecture is critical
efficient. The motor sub-system remains at nearly
80
70
Efficiency (%)
70
for extending
the smart lock’s battery life. Power
50
Buck full-load efficiency
ηBuck1 = 90%
40
30
Power
Management
Buck
2.5 V
AA
20
5V
10
AA
Buck standby efficiency
ηBuck2 = 67%
AA
0
1
4s1p
10
100
1m
Output Current (A)
10m
VIN = 3.6V
management
is necessary to convert the battery
40
VIN = 3.6V
VIN = 4.0V
Wireless
VIN = 5.0V
Microcontroller
VIN = 6.0V
VIN = 7.2V
VIN = 8.4V
VIN = 10.0V
VIN = 6.0V
20
VIN = 7.2V
consumes
some of the battery’s energy to function.
Figure
0 6 on the following page shows three pie
100m
1
10
100
1m
10m
graphs of the power consumption
of all three
Output Current (A)
D003
100m
system blocks in a real smart lock for one day of
Motor Driver
with Motor
D004
operation. The percentages
Figure 9. show
VOUT =how
1.5 Vmuch of
the2.625
total system power budget is used for each
Motor driver efficiency
ηMD = 100%
VIN = 3.6V
of the
three sub-systems, and the bar charts
V = 4.0V
2.600
Figure 4. Smart lock block diagram using a buck converter and four
3.366
AA cells connected in series.
IN
show the total power consumption in each VVIN == 5.0V
6.0V
2.575
3.333
3.300
Extending battery life in smart locks
3.267
VIN = 8.4V
VIN = 10.0V
10
Figure 8. VOUT = 1.8 V
3.399
VIN = 4.0V
30 to what is required by each sub-system,
VIN = 5.0V
voltage
but it
VIN = 4.0V
VIN = 5.0V
VIN = 6.0V
5
Output Voltage (V)
50
AA
Efficiency (%)
100
1m
Output Current (A)
Power
management architecture
90
80
comparison
90
Output Voltage (V)
10
Figure 5. An ultra-low power buck converter’s efficiency remains high,
even at very light loads. Figure 7. VOUT = 2.5 V
Figure 6. VOUT full
= 3.3
V the buck
the wireless microcontroller’s
load,
100
converter,
VIN = 3.6V
VIN = 4.0V
VIN = 5.0V
VIN = 6.0V
VIN = 7.2V
VIN = 8.4V
VIN = 10.0V
40
20
0
Taking
the same power architecture as the LDO
1
50
30
VIN = 5.0V
VIN = 6.0V
VIN = 7.2V
VIN = 8.4V
VIN = 10.0V
Buck
converter
10
60
2.550
2.525
2.500
2.475
IN
VIN = 7.2V
VIN = 8.4V
VIN = 10.0V
November 2016
Daily power consumption with 24 lock/unlock events and
®
500-ms Bluetooth low energy advertising period
Average
Power in
μW
900
Average
Power in
μW
900
LDO: 5 V to 2.5 V
800
Average
Power in
μW
900
800
800
Boost: 2.5 V to 5 V
700
600
Wireless
MCU
29%
500
LDO
50%
600
600
300
200
100
Boost
39%
Motor
Driver
26%
100
0
Buck: 5 V to 2.5 V
500
Wireless
MCU
35%
400
Motor
Driver
21%
200
700
500
400
300
700
0
Buck
7%
400
300
Wireless
MCU
53%
200
Motor
Driver
40%
100
0
LDO
Boost
Buck
Figure 6. Total and sub-system-level daily power consumption of the three power architectures.
power architecture. A 500-ms advertising period
Figure 7 compares all three power architectures
and 24 lock/unlock events per day are used in
with the number of lock/unlock events on the
the calculations. For visual representation, the
x axis and the number of years of battery life on
overall size of each pie chart is proportional to
the y axis. For many applications, which have less
the total power used for each of the three power
than 36 events per day, both the buck and boost
management architectures—the bigger the pie
architectures offer an improvement in battery life
chart, the greater amount of power consumed.
compared to the LDO architecture. For higher lock/
The height of each pie chart also shows the total
unlock event systems, the buck architecture is still
power consumption.
best, but the boost architecture becomes worse
than the LDO architecture due to the higher amount
9
of motor power required for more events.
Lock/Unlock Events vs. Battery Life with 500-ms Advertising Period
8.5
Buck
Boost
LDO
8
Conclusion
7.5
New power architectures in connected devices,
Battery Life in Years
7
6.5
such as smart locks, enable much higher
6
battery life compared to the current LDO-based
5.5
5
implementations. A switching power converter,
4.5
either a boost or buck, increases battery life for
4
3.5
smart locks with less than 36 lock/unlock events per
3
day. An ultra-low power buck converter more than
2.5
2
doubles the battery life for lower event systems,
1.5
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
while nearly doubling the battery life for higher event
Number of Events Per Day
Figure 7. Battery life versus power architecture and number of events
per day.
Extending battery life in smart locks
systems. The ultra-low IQ of such a buck converter
6
November 2016
is critical to the battery life extension by vastly
increasing the efficiency during the lengthy ­
standby-modes of such systems. Designers of
connected and IoT products should take another
look at their power management architectures
to make sure their products achieve optimal
battery life.
References
1. Joakim Lindh, Christin Lee, and Marie
Hernes. Measuring Bluetooth Low Energy
Consumption, Texas Instruments Application
Report (SWRA478), December 2016
2. Smart Lock Reference Design Enabling 5+
Years Battery Life on 4× AA Batteries, TI
Design (TIDA-00757)
3. Chris Glaser. IQ: What it is, what it isn’t, and
how to use it, TI Application Note (SLYT412),
2Q11
4. Product folders: CC2640, DRV8833,
TPS76625, TPS61030, TPS62745
Important Notice: The products and services of Texas Instruments Incorporated and its subsidiaries described herein are sold subject to TI’s standard
terms and conditions of sale. Customers are advised to obtain the most current and complete information about TI products and services before placing
orders. TI assumes no l­iability for applications assistance, customer’s applications or product designs, software performance, or infringement of patents.
The publication of information regarding any other company’s products or services does not constitute TI’s approval, warranty or endorsement thereof.
The platform bar and SimpleLink are trademarks of Texas Instruments. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
© 2016 Texas Instruments Incorporated
SLYY107
IMPORTANT NOTICE
Texas Instruments Incorporated and its subsidiaries (TI) reserve the right to make corrections, enhancements, improvements and other
changes to its semiconductor products and services per JESD46, latest issue, and to discontinue any product or service per JESD48, latest
issue. Buyers should obtain the latest relevant information before placing orders and should verify that such information is current and
complete. All semiconductor products (also referred to herein as “components”) are sold subject to TI’s terms and conditions of sale
supplied at the time of order acknowledgment.
TI warrants performance of its components to the specifications applicable at the time of sale, in accordance with the warranty in TI’s terms
and conditions of sale of semiconductor products. Testing and other quality control techniques are used to the extent TI deems necessary
to support this warranty. Except where mandated by applicable law, testing of all parameters of each component is not necessarily
performed.
TI assumes no liability for applications assistance or the design of Buyers’ products. Buyers are responsible for their products and
applications using TI components. To minimize the risks associated with Buyers’ products and applications, Buyers should provide
adequate design and operating safeguards.
TI does not warrant or represent that any license, either express or implied, is granted under any patent right, copyright, mask work right, or
other intellectual property right relating to any combination, machine, or process in which TI components or services are used. Information
published by TI regarding third-party products or services does not constitute a license to use such products or services or a warranty or
endorsement thereof. Use of such information may require a license from a third party under the patents or other intellectual property of the
third party, or a license from TI under the patents or other intellectual property of TI.
Reproduction of significant portions of TI information in TI data books or data sheets is permissible only if reproduction is without alteration
and is accompanied by all associated warranties, conditions, limitations, and notices. TI is not responsible or liable for such altered
documentation. Information of third parties may be subject to additional restrictions.
Resale of TI components or services with statements different from or beyond the parameters stated by TI for that component or service
voids all express and any implied warranties for the associated TI component or service and is an unfair and deceptive business practice.
TI is not responsible or liable for any such statements.
Buyer acknowledges and agrees that it is solely responsible for compliance with all legal, regulatory and safety-related requirements
concerning its products, and any use of TI components in its applications, notwithstanding any applications-related information or support
that may be provided by TI. Buyer represents and agrees that it has all the necessary expertise to create and implement safeguards which
anticipate dangerous consequences of failures, monitor failures and their consequences, lessen the likelihood of failures that might cause
harm and take appropriate remedial actions. Buyer will fully indemnify TI and its representatives against any damages arising out of the use
of any TI components in safety-critical applications.
In some cases, TI components may be promoted specifically to facilitate safety-related applications. With such components, TI’s goal is to
help enable customers to design and create their own end-product solutions that meet applicable functional safety standards and
requirements. Nonetheless, such components are subject to these terms.
No TI components are authorized for use in FDA Class III (or similar life-critical medical equipment) unless authorized officers of the parties
have executed a special agreement specifically governing such use.
Only those TI components which TI has specifically designated as military grade or “enhanced plastic” are designed and intended for use in
military/aerospace applications or environments. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that any military or aerospace use of TI components
which have not been so designated is solely at the Buyer's risk, and that Buyer is solely responsible for compliance with all legal and
regulatory requirements in connection with such use.
TI has specifically designated certain components as meeting ISO/TS16949 requirements, mainly for automotive use. In any case of use of
non-designated products, TI will not be responsible for any failure to meet ISO/TS16949.
Products
Applications
Audio
www.ti.com/audio
Automotive and Transportation
www.ti.com/automotive
Amplifiers
amplifier.ti.com
Communications and Telecom
www.ti.com/communications
Data Converters
dataconverter.ti.com
Computers and Peripherals
www.ti.com/computers
DLP® Products
www.dlp.com
Consumer Electronics
www.ti.com/consumer-apps
DSP
dsp.ti.com
Energy and Lighting
www.ti.com/energy
Clocks and Timers
www.ti.com/clocks
Industrial
www.ti.com/industrial
Interface
interface.ti.com
Medical
www.ti.com/medical
Logic
logic.ti.com
Security
www.ti.com/security
Power Mgmt
power.ti.com
Space, Avionics and Defense
www.ti.com/space-avionics-defense
Microcontrollers
microcontroller.ti.com
Video and Imaging
www.ti.com/video
RFID
www.ti-rfid.com
OMAP Applications Processors
www.ti.com/omap
TI E2E Community
e2e.ti.com
Wireless Connectivity
www.ti.com/wirelessconnectivity
Mailing Address: Texas Instruments, Post Office Box 655303, Dallas, Texas 75265
Copyright © 2016, Texas Instruments Incorporated