Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
TOT Phenomenon 1 Running Head: TOT Phenomenon Neural Mechanism of the TOT phenomenon and its correlation with bilinguals Ji Yoon Park Bugil Academy GLP The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon is the feeling that a currently inaccessible item will be recalled. In other words, it is a state in which there is evidence of knowledge but no imminent retrieval for items. The TOT phenomenon has been actively researched for its psychological origins such as the effects of emotion and lexical based studies on memory. Molecules and cellular based studies have not been widely researched because it is hard to precisely capture the moment when TOT phenomenon is occurring and it is even harder to conduct a neural analysis at that moment. However, this paper aims to integrate the mechanisms of long-term memory, organization of recent and remote memories, the molecules involved in maintaining and inhibiting long-term memory, and the proposed theories of system consolidation to posit a comprehensive hypothesis of how malfunctions in long-term memory contribute to the TOT phenomenon. It is hypothesized that system consolidation, a systemic memory mechanism different from a synaptic point of view, is correlated with memory precision and PKM zeta, CaMKII, NMDAR, and AMDAR induces memory reorganization and helps maintain long term memory. The following literature reviews attempt to support the hypothesis. In a review of the organization of recent and remote memories by Bontempi and Frankland (2005), the cellular correlation of memory reactivation was shown. Memory reactivation is the core mechanism in memory consolidation model. Reactivation of the hippocampal memory leads to the reinstatement of experience-dependent patterns of neural activity in the cortex. Subsequent stabilization and iterative refinement of cortical traces store completely on the cortex, which becomes independent of the hippocampus. Baars and Gage agree with the consolidation hypothesis as it relates to stabilization of long-term memory by transferring temporary synapse connections to permanent traces. System consolidation is now known to be triggered by the interaction between temporal lobe and neocortex activity. Immediate memories are encoded as neurons in the neocortex that make new connections. However, for permanent memories, RNA or protein synthesis is required. In this process, dendrite spines grow and develop to a stabilized and rigid structure. Long term potentiation (LTP) and long term depression (LTD) are also central to the consolidation model since both only refers to consolidation at cellular level and local change in synapse connection efficiency. Synapse mechanism, gene transcription, and protein synthesis occur in order during the rapid consolidation process. According to the molecular switch hypothesis proposed by Lisman, calcium ions (Ca2+) enter into a postsynaptic cell and activate CaMKII in the CA1 region of the hippocampus before LTP occurs. Each subunit of CaMKII catalyzes phosphorylation of substrate proteins in response to the increase of Ca2+calmodulin complex. The catalytic region performs a phosphorylation reaction. The regulatory region normally covers the catalytic region which keeps the enzyme off. The hinge opens on activation of the molecule by Ca2+-bound calmodulin, freeing the catalytic region to add phosphate group to other proteins. Large increase in Ca2+ can cause autophosphorylation (phosphorylation of one subunit by another), and enables the catalytic region to stay on permanently. Persistent activity of CaMKII can contribute to maintaining the synaptic potentiation by keeping postsynaptic AMPA receptors phosphorylated. α-CaMKII signaling enzymes are expressed in excitatory forebrain neurons and have a crucial role in neuronal plasticity. Therefore, under sudden pressure or stressful situations like when experimental mice are in a “freezing” status, neuronal and cortical plasticity are more vulnerable to being hindered to form remote hippocampus-independent memories, and result in premature memory loss at extended retention delays. These deficits in cortical plasticity observed in hippocampus-independent memories also show an overexpression of PAK (p21-activated kinase) that regulates spinogenesis in neuronal cultures, which can serve as proof to the occurrence of TOT phenomenon as well. These abnormalities are limited to the cortex, where neurons have fewer dendritic spines and increased proportion of larger synapses. These alterations are known to be associated with enhanced LTP but decreased LTD as well. However, it is important to note that not only CaMKII molecules, but also MAPK (mitogenactivated protein kinase), PKA (protein kinase A), NMDAR neurotransmitters and CREB (cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein) are involved in the initial stabilization of memory and are not interrupted by those inhibitor agents. Lisman demonstrated that the role of persistent signaling of molecules in memory maintenance but did not account the morphology of synaptic connections into consideration. Dudai, Shema, and Sacktor (2007) demonstrated from an experiment conducted on a rat cortex that long-term associative memories vanished rapidly after local application of an inhibitor of the protein kinase C isoform, PKM zeta. In the neocortex, which is assumed to be the repository of multiple types of long-term memory, persistence of memory is dependent ongoing activity of a protein kinase long after that memory is considered to have consolidated into a long-term stable form. The main question this article addresses is whether persistent phosphorylation by PKM zeta is critical for storage of long-term memory in cortex. Dudai, Sacktor, and Shema investigated taste memory in the insular cortex, which contains the gustatory cortex in an experimental rat’s brain and microinfused ZIP (selective PKM zeta pseudosubstrate inhibitor) bilaterally into the insular cortex after three days and seven days. The PKM zeta inhibitor blocked memory at all times showed difference between ZIP groups at 3 days and 7 days and the controls and it demonstrated that the effect of ZIP on long-term memory is rapid and is not eliminated by intensifying training. In this experiment done in latent inhibition (LI), familiarity with the tastant attenuated its potency to serve as conditioned stimulus in subsequent conditioned taste aversion (CTA) training and microinfusion of ZIP into the insular cortex after exposure to the tastant in the LI protocol had no effect on familiarity. Although it may be far-fetched to connect this experiment to semantic and lexical memory within the TOT phenomenon because this experiment is only limited to long term memory gustatory memory consolidation, it may be safe to conclude that because PKM zeta inhibitor in the hippocampus did not impair CTA memory, the effect of ZIP that could affect inhibiting a sudden recall of semantic memory is thus region-specific. Sacktor (2011) raises several questions in his review paper are addressed: How does a brief exposure to PKM zeta inhibitor (ZIP groups) rapidly disrupt a stable memory? After inhibitors are removed, how can new memories be learned and stored with retraining? Lastly, how does transiently inhibiting PKM zeta produce persistent retrograde memory erasure, with no anterograde effect? PKM zeta is a constitutively active protein kinase C isoform, expressed exclusively in neural tissue and enriched in the forebrain. It enhances postsynaptic AMPAR responses, which mediate fast excitatory synaptic transmission in the brain through continual phosphorylation. Sacktor posits that AMPAR-mediated synaptic transmission is directly related to why LTP maintenance and memories that were stable become fragile with the loss of PKM zeta activity. Agents that block the trafficking to the synapse-such as zeta inhibitory peptide (ZIP) which inhibits PKM zeta and pep 2m which blocks NSF binding to GluR2 prevent and reverse long-term potentiation (LTP) reverse. In LTP maintenance, PKM zeta continues to decrease receptor endocytosis and enhances the action of NSF that prevents PICK1-mediated postsynaptic removal of GluR2, thus stabilizing the increased number of receptors at postsynaptic sites. In contrast, during LTP reversal of memory erasure by ZIP, PKM zeta activity is inhibited and extra receptors from the synapse are removed. This review supports the hypothesis that PKM zeta functions to maintain long-term memory and temporary inhibition may hinder recall of certain memories. However, there is necessity for more research on the substrates of PKM zeta phosphorylation that mediate synaptic potentiation and how new information may be incorporated into PKM zeta-mediated memory traces by reconsolidation. If the molecular mechanism of memory storage can be reduced to the presence of absence of PKM zeta at specific synaptic regions, a memory trace can be possibly quantified after humans learn and remember, such as by counting the number of dendritic spines containing PKM zeta.