Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Biology and Control of Floating Heart (Nymphoides cristata) Leif Willey – University of Florida Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants Infestation pic Nymphoides - Dicotyledons • About 50 species world wide – All aquatic, found on every continent except Antarctica – Common weeds in rice fields • 5 species found in US (2 natives) – all 5 found in FL • Nymphaeid growth • Multiple methods of vegetative spread Nymphaeid Growth Form Floating leaves Elongated stem Sediment surface roots N. cristata N. cristata Distribution of Exotic Nymphoides in the US Jacono and Langeland Distribution of Native Nymphoides Nymphoides aquatica Nymphoides cordata Identification -N. peltata(introduced) N. Cristata (introduced) N. Cordata (native) N. Aquatica (native) N. indica (introduced) Feathery projections covering petal N. cristata(introduced) Erect Longitudinal Crest N. cordata and N. aquatica (Natives) Buying Invasives Online • Out of state • In state • • • • • • • • • • • • • • http://www.pondplants.com http://toptropicals.com/ https://www.pondmegastore.com http://www.watergarden.org http://www.grassrootsnursery.com/ http://www.lilypons.com/ http://www.pondplants2you.com http://www.pondworld.com http://www.blueridgefish.com http://springdalewatergardens.com Aquatic nursery Industry ~ $1billion http://www.floridaaquatic.com http://www.aquariumplants.com http://asr4ponds.com/ http://www.coolponds.com N. Cristata (crested floating heart) Native to Asia -First report 1996 -few scientific studies ID characteristics - flower - floating leaves -habitat Invasiveness - Spread -Problems Why Study Floating Heart ? • Continuing to Spread – Water gardens and site transfer • Very limited information on N. cristata • Difficult to manage – Low success rate with various herbicide approaches – no accepted standard for control • Grass carp are not a viable option – Rapid spread in Lake Marion/Moultrie (Other SE Reservoirs where carp are stocked ?) N cristata is a Category 1 Invasive species in FL(2009) Category1: invasive exotic that is displacing native species, changing community structures, or ecological functions. Present in natural areas Invasive potential N. Cristata in Lake Marion, SC 20 acres to 2000 acres in 2 yrs • Spread • Competitive ability • Herbicide response -current techniques Canal in SW Florida Canal pic N. Cristata Growth studies • Soil type and soil fertility • Light Intensity Pic of daughter plant “starting with low biomass” Sediment & Fertility Mean Number of Emergent Leaves with 95% CI -Orange Lake (77% O.M) -Potting soil mix • Highly fertile sand sediment yielded greatest growth • Non amended lake sediments = poor growth • Growth more dependent on nutrient availability than sediment type 60 0g/kg 1g/kg 4g/kg 40 20 0 Potting Soil Muck Sand Soil Type Mean Dry Weigh (g) with 95% CI 40 30 Dry weight (g) • 3 soil types -L ake Toho (97% sand), # of Emergent Leaves 80 0g/kg 1g/kg 4g/kg 20 10 0 Potting Soil Muck Soil type Sand Light Intensity Mean Number of Emergent Leaves with 95%CI # of Emergent Leaves • Daughter plants established at 5 light intensities – (1, 5, 25, 50 & 100% incident light) 16 2week 4week 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1% 5% 25% 50% 100% Percent Incident Light at Water Surface • Measured parameters peaked at 25% light 5 Dry Weight (g) • At 1% light (~20 µmoles) - daughter plants produced small viable leaves that reached the water surface Mean Dry Weight (g) with 95% CI 2week 4week 4 3 2 1 0 1% 5% 25% 50% 100% Percent Incident Light at Water Surface Management Research Objectives • Determine response of N. cristata to herbicides • Does method of application influence efficacy? – Emergent vs. submersed • Does herbicide formulation influence efficacy ? – Granular vs. liquid • Determine factors that influence herbicide translocation – E.g. water depth, leaf surface area Translocation ? Herbicide Screening • All registered aquatic herbicides evaluated - Comparative Trials – Focusing on short exposure times - Exception – ALS herbicides and Fluridone = static exposures • Method of application – Emergent – Submersed * liquid vs. granular Growth regulators Mean Dry Weight at 24hr. Exposure 4WAT mean dry weight dry weight (g) 60 • 2,4-D and Triclopyr - dicots • 24 and 96 hour exposures 20 – Liquid and granular 0 PT Con 2.5(S) 1.25(S) 2.5(G) 1.25(G) 4qt(F) 2qt(F) Triclopyr treatments triclopyr 96 hour exposure mean dry weight and 05% CI MEAN 60 dry weight(g) • Emergent 1 to 4 qts/acre • No reduction of biomass at 4 WAT • Limited visual injury 40 40 20 0 PT CON 2.5S treatments 2.5G Contact Herbicides 24hour Exposure mean weights 60 Contact herbicides Dry Weight (g) 50 40 30 20 10 0 PT CON A3S A1.5S A3G A1.5G D185 D93 F400 F200 treatments Contact Herbicides 96 hour Exposure and Foliar mean weights 60 Col 6 50 Dry weight (g) • 24 & 96 hour exposures • Foliar and submersed strategies tested • Formulation had limited impact • Greater reductions in biomass at 96 hour exposure Mean 40 30 20 10 0 PT CON A3S A3G Treatment D185 A2Q D2Q Contact herbicides cont. Contact herbicides 24H. mean dry weights w/ 95%CI 20 mean 18 16 14 Dry weight (g) • Diquat at 370 ppb regrew to pre treatment dry weights with 24 Hr exposure • Hydrothol was most effective at preventing regrowth 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 PT CON D370 treatment H.5S H.25S Systemic herbicides Mean Dry Weights with 95% CI for ALS Herbicides 100 mean dry weight 80 Dry weight (g) • Static exposures • Foliar and submersed treatments • Imazamox and Imazapyr applied foliar yielded fast burn down with no regrowth at 4 WAT. • Glyphosate alone not effective 60 40 20 0 PT CON G(2qt) IM(4qt) IP(2qt) P(5.4oz) P(20) ALS Herbicide Treatments IM(250) Results and Ongoing Research • Herbicides – – good at removing surface leaves – Poor at controlling the plant • Compare foliar and submersed strategies for the most active herbicides – Strategies to control daughter plants • Competition studies with hydrilla Hydrilla and Nymphoides – -Growth at low light intensities -Growth from propagules (tubers or daughter plants Rapid growth to water surface Formation of large contiguous canopies Grass Carp - Love Hydrilla - Hate Nymphoides Questions?