Download Missing Data Imputation Using Evolutionary k

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Cluster analysis wikipedia , lookup

Principal component analysis wikipedia , lookup

K-means clustering wikipedia , lookup

Nonlinear dimensionality reduction wikipedia , lookup

K-nearest neighbors algorithm wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Missing Data Imputation Using
Evolutionary k- Nearest Neighbour
Algorithm for Gene Expression Data
Hiroshi de Silva, A. Shehan Perera
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
University of Moratuwa
Presentation Outline
● Gene Expression Data
● Missing Data Imputation Methods
○ Complete Case Analysis
○ Available Case Analysis
○ Mean Imputation
○ Median/ Mode Imputation
○ Machine Learning Approaches
● Advantages of kNNImputation
● Disadvantages of kNNImputation
● EvlkNNImputation
● Methodology
● Data
● Evolution and Results
● Summary
Gene Expression Data
Image: “Gene Expression, ” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Missing Data
Missing values of gene expression data occur for many reasons
such as:
● Insufficient resolution
● Image corruption
● Due to dust or scratches on the slide
● As a result of the robotic methods used to create them.
Missing Data Imputation Methods
●
●
●
●
●
Complete Case Analysis
Available Case Analysis
Mean/ Median/ Mode Substitution
Multiple Imputation
Machine Learning Approaches
Complete Case Analysis
● Discard of missing data.
● Dropping such cases with missing data has yield
biased or inconclusive results even though such
techniques are still widely used in software
engineering.
Available Case Analysis
● Different subsets of data are taken to different aspects of
the same study due to inability in taking the full dataset
because some values of variables have incomplete data.
Complete case analysis and available case analysis both are
reducing the sample sizes of the datasets.
Mean Imputation
● Missing value imputation of numerical data is mostly
handled in general by mean substitution in several works.
● Can distort the distribution for the variable which is used
for imputation by underestimating the standard deviation.
Median Imputation
Median imputation is also used to assure robustness
since mean is affected by outliers of a dataset.
Mode Imputation
For the categorical attributes, the mode imputation is
used instead of mean and median of a dataset .
Machine Learning Approaches
● Many machine learning algorithms solve missing data
problem in an efficient way.
● Advantage of using a machine learning approach is that
the missing data treatment is independent of the learning
algorithm used.
Advantages of kNNImpute
● It does not require to create a predictive model for
each attribute with missing values in the dataset.
● Treat instances with multiple missing values.
● It considers the correlation structure of data.
● Predict both qualitative and quantitative attributes
Disadvantages of kNNImpute
● The results depend on the parameter k.
● The time required by the algorithm to calculate the distance between
instances.
Evl-kNNImpute
● Optimized k for a given dataset
● Assign weights to each attribute/ feature in a dataset.
Methodology
Genetic Algorithm
Original Data with missing
values
Data instances without
missing values
Complete dataset with
missing values
Fitness
Score
Weights
k- Nearest Neighbor
Trained Model
Imputed Dataset
Data
Data Set
Features
Instances
Time taken for
optimization
gasch2
51
204
28.85 sec
spo
76
1597
19.8 min
seq
14
500
44.12 sec
Evolution and Results
Evolution and Results
Evolution and Results
Summary
• Mean imputation is better when there are very few missing values in a
dataset but often this is not the case when it comes to gene expression
data as those datasets contain a considerable amount of missing data.
• This is where the need of a supervised learning algorithm occurs and
the proposed algorithm is designed to overcome the disadvantages in
the kNNImpute algorithm.
By looking at the results we can conclude that EvlkNNImpute outperforms
the mean imputation and kNNImputation approaches.
References
[1]
O. Troyanskaya, M. Cantor, G. Sherlock, P. Brown, T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, D. Botstein, and R. B.
Altman, “Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays,” Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 520–
525, Jun. 2001.
[2]
“Gene expression,” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 09-Jan-2016.
[3]
E. Acuña and C. Rodriguez, “The Treatment of Missing Values and its Effect on Classifier
Accuracy,” in Classification, Clustering, and Data Mining Applications, D. D. Banks, D. F. R. McMorris, D. P.
Arabie, and P. D. W. Gaul, Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004, pp. 639–647.
[4]
S. Chu, J. DeRisi, M. Eisen, J. Mulholland, D. Botstein, P. O. Brown, and I. Herskowitz, “The
transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast,” Science, vol. 282, no. 5389, pp. 699–705, Oct. 1998.
[5]
A. P. Gasch, M. Huang, S. Metzner, D. Botstein, S. J. Elledge, and P. O. Brown, “Genomic
expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p,” Mol.
Biol. Cell, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 2987–3003, Oct. 2001.
[6] A. Gelman and J. Hill, “Missing-data imputation,” in Data Analysis Using Regression and
Multilevel%2FHierarchical Models, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[7]
A. Mockus, “Missing Data in Software Engineering,” in Guide to Advanced Empirical Software
Engineering, F. Shull, J. Singer, and D. I. K. Sjøberg, Eds. Springer London, 2008, pp. 185–200.
THANK YOU !
Q&A
[email protected]
ICTER 2016