Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
WWF Q&A for Rio+20 1. What have been the main legacies from the Earth Summit in 1992? Some of the most significant international agreements addressing the challenges facing our planet – The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity, the forest principles, Agenda 21 and the Rio Declaration - were developed 20 years ago when the world’s leaders met in Rio de Janeiro for the first Earth Summit. The Earth Summit was one of the first United Nations meetings that saw civil society involved to such a wide extent. Since 1992, civil society has been at the table in many key discussions on sustainable development. 2. What does this Conference mean for WWF? Rio+20 is an opportunity to build on the success of the first Earth Summit in 1992, and the sustainable development successes since then. Rio is the forum for leaders to launch a vision and a plan that catalyzes fundamental change in our economies towards environmental stability and social and economic equity, and ensure food, water and energy security for all. WWF’s recent Living Planet Report warned that the world currently consumes 1.5 planets’ worth of resources – Rio+20 is one of the most immediate and potentially influential opportunities to equitably bring and maintain consumption to sustainable levels. Governments at Rio+20 need to show that they are committed to preserving wellbeing on this planet and to provide a roadmap on how they will achieve this. 3. What will success look like at Rio? Success in Rio+20 means world leaders come together and deliver a clear vision of how we can ensure food, water, and energy security for all, and commit to a future where humans live in harmony with nature. This success should be crystallized in a strong and ambitious outcomes document with clear timelines, goals, and a reporting mechanism on progress, notably on: Accounting and reporting for natural wealth Targets on thematic issues such as food, water, energy and oceans Launching of sustainable development goals and indicators that go beyond GDP. In detail WWF would like the UN Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio to: Acknowledge the interlinkages between food, water and energy and the need to sustainably manage natural resources underpinning them in order to alleviate poverty and enhance equitable wellbeing. Make a global commitment to develop fully funded Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with clear targets, timelines and indicators that will be fully integrated with the existing postMDG review process. Provide that the sustainable management of natural wealth requires that the value of ecosystem services is properly recognised and accounted for. Agree on a process that would include transparent, annual reporting and review that would result in the elimination of all subsidies that negatively impact the environment by 2020. 4. What is WWF's opinion of the co-chairs text? (June 7th 2012) This question will need to regularly updated as negotiations progress This is not a text that is ready for Heads of State. Country positions are still too entrenched and too far apart to provide a meaningful draft agreement for approval by Heads of State present in Rio. The text lacks political vision and the tone is weak and passive, with actions by Parties being limited to “recognizing”, “encouraging” and “calling upon”. The co-chairs text lacks specific timelines, targets and provisions for reporting. Also it doesn’t reflect the growing consensus around the flaws of the current economic growth model, and the need for redefining “progress” on a planet with limited resources. It lacks a clear path to go beyond GDP. The Sustainable Development Goals have made progress, with priority areas now being specified, including food, water and energy security though at this stage these are still in brackets. However, the water-food-energy nexus needs more consistency and coherence in relation to decision- and policy- making. WWF welcomes specific language on the integration of the Sustainable Development Goals process to the post-2015 development framework. 5. What are WWF's main asks at Rio? WWF is asking world leaders to agree to a global political mandate that would shape an ambitious sustainable development agenda for the years to come. This mandate should include the following: Sustainable Development Goals: Rio+20 should agree on a clear political mandate to mainstream sustainable development across the post-2015 MDG development framework. At Rio+20, world leaders should launch an expert-led process to develop fully-funded Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), with clear targets, timelines and indicators, which must be integrated with the existing post-MDG review process. SDGs should integrate the three dimension of sustainable development, and be universally applicable and equitable. The SDGs should be integrated into the MDG post-2015 framework. To ensure the achievement of the SDGs, a sustainable development body within the UN could act as the agency where progress toward SDGs is reviewed and promoted. Valuing natural wealth: The sustainable management of natural wealth requires that the value of ecosystem services is properly recognised and accounted for. At Rio+20, world leaders should: Agree to set up clear and comparable methodologies for indicators to measure the quality of the environment, nature, biodiversity and ecosystem alongside existing economic (GDP) and social (IHDI) indicators. Pledge to take fiscal, legal and regulatory measures to better embed the value of nature, biodiversity and ecosystem services in national accounts and corporate balance sheets and reporting duties. Subsidy reform: At Rio+20, governments should agree to transparent annual reporting and review on subsidy reform leading to the elimination, by 2020, of all subsidies that negatively impact the environment. This should include: All subsidies to fossil fuel industry All subsidies that encourage unsustainable farming, deforestation and damaging ranching practices All forms of subsidies that encourage destructive fishing practices, growth in fishing fleet size and fishing effort, including fossil fuels subsidies for fishing vessels. Ocean governance: Healthy oceans are critical to support the wellbeing of humanity. At Rio+20, world leaders should initiate, as soon as possible, the negotiation of an implementing agreement to United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) that would address the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. Food, water and energy goals: World leaders must acknowledge the interlinkages between food, water and energy and the need to sustainably manage the ecosystems, their functions and services. These underpin the achievement of progress in those areas to deliver poverty eradication. At Rio+20, world leaders must agree to ambitious goals to deliver universal access to food, water and energy by 2030, with social, economic and environmental considerations embedded as objectives under each of these goals. 6. What about Sustainable Development Goals? WWF welcomes the concept of Sustainable Development Goals as a means to address the critical and interlinked challenges facing the development agenda to 2030. Rio+20 should deliver a strong outcome on Sustainable Development Goals – through the creation of a common vision, principles, and criteria to embed sustainability in the post-2015 development framework, with key thematic areas identified in Rio+20’s outcome document as well as indicators to measure progress. Any work coming out of Rio+20 needs clear and accountable goals and timelines that have sustainability at their core and can be taken up by the process to developing Sustainable Development Goals by 2015. WWF wants Sustainable Development Goals to better recognise and balance the three dimensions of sustainable development – economic, social and environmental and be agreed in Rio. 7. What do we mean by a green economy or green economies? “Green economies” (plural) is a recognition that there is no one sort of “Green Economy”, no one size fits all. Green economies seek to effectively manage and govern natural resources, and to de-couple growth from resource depletion. They also seek to improve human well-being in an equitable way, within the planet’s ecosystems carrying capacity. The vision of green economies is to provide people with clean water, energy and food for present and future generations, by safeguarding the natural world and promoting pro-poor growth and full employment. We have the chance to recognise green economies as an opportunity for all, while ensuring developed countries take the lead in promoting sustainable production and consumption to reduce their global footprint. There is an opportunity for countries to establish clear and comparable indicators, linked to Sustainable Development Goals, to measure environment quality by 2015. Recognising that there is no one size fits all green economy solution, Rio provides the opportunity for governments to commit to develop, fund and implement appropriate national strategies and action plans to deliver green economies. These plans need clear objectives, goals, timelines and transparent reporting. Both public and private sector commitments are needed to help finance and implement the evolution towards green economies. Moreover, international cooperation should be strengthened to include technology cooperation, investment support, capacity-building and experience sharing between developed and developing countries, in order to deliver green economies. Furthermore, we need to “green” the GDP. The market value of goods should reflect their social and environmental cost. We need to put an economic value on our natural capital. Our present economic system does not account for the environmental and social benefit of natural resources. Companies and governments must be required to report and reflect the environmental cost of their activities in national accounts and corporate balance sheets. 8. What is WWF's involvement at Rio? At Rio, WWF has been involved in Rio preparations with governments, civil society and the corporate sector. WWF is involved in more than ten side events in Rio. See www.panda.org 9. How has WWF contributed to Rio+20 negotiations to date? WWF has developed policy recommendations for Rio+20, and these have been communicated to governments. These recommendations have been developed with the WWF global network and have been used by WWF national offices in discussions with their governments. In addition, WWF has held frequent discussions with civil society organizations, leveraging one another’s involvement in Rio. 10. What is the food, water and energy nexus? Agencies and organizations have been working on water, energy and food security for decades. But, for the most part, they have treated them like distinct issues. The food, water and energy nexus is about recognizing and capitalizing on the interlinkages between water, energy and food, to develop policies that yield benefits across all three. This implies conserving the natural capital food water and energy resources depend on. 11. Why should food, water and energy security be one of the main asks at Rio? All three are essential to our well-being. They are the foundation of our societies and the lifeblood of our economies. They are also closely linked, and as we focus on one, too often we overlook the implications for the others. 12. How do we ensure food, water and energy security for all? Specifically, WWF asks governments and businesses to: Govern and manage water according to the Earth’s carrying capacity rather than political boundaries, and within the framework of integrated, participatory river basin management. Invest in integrated programming between freshwater conservation and water, sanitation and hygiene. Protect and restore freshwater ecosystems so they can sustain biodiversity and the functions that are vital for human health, livelihoods, well-being and security. Mitigate cities’ water footprint, increase urban resilience to climate change and variability, and reduce water risks in urban settings. Increase efficiency in the food system by reducing waste in the production and distribution of food. Promote alternative consumption patterns, including more balanced diets that are less rich in meat, fish and dairy in high-income countries. Reduce the footprint of agriculture by making sustainable food production central to development and encouraging the treatment and re-use of wastewater for agricultural purposes. Adopt, enforce and comply with laws, regulations, policies and standards on sustainable hydropower. Introduce fiscal policy and incentives to drive private investment in renewable, reliable and sustainable energy supplies in developing countries. 13. What is a blue economy? The concept of a blue economy does not compete with the green economy approach. Oceans are critical to sustaining Earth's life support systems. Numerous communities and billions of people are dependent on oceans for livelihoods, food security and economic development. “Blue” and “green” economies are interdependent. It is critical to protect and sustainably manage the use of the world's oceans in a way that provides equitable benefits from ocean resources to developing coastal communities and states, in particular Small Island Developing States.” Pacific Small Island Developing States (SIDS) have said that for their countries, the “green economy” is in fact a “blue economy.” The Pacific SIDS would like to see Rio become a turning point in commitments to protect and sustainably manage the world’s oceans in a way that provides equitable benefits to the people and nations relying on ocean resources as their primary source of development. As part of this view, oceans and fisheries issues must be featured prominently on the Rio+20 agenda.