Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
More than just another stethoscope Mark Bromley Emergency Medicine PGY3 Undifferentiated Hypotension - Echo LV function Volume Status JVP Procedures Guided Lumbar Puncture Abscess Drainage Pleural effusion/Thoracentesis Paracentesis Suprapubic aspiration Vascular Access Joint taps Galbladder DVT Ocular Fracture Detection Fracture Management Renal Pneumothorax Intubation ...for the cardiologist in you 67 ♂ Hx of CAD and CHF Unwell over last 2-3 days Hypotensive Tachycardic SOB Urgent diagnostic evaluation Timely Limited diagnostic options due to the clinical condition → transportation of sick patients Allow appropriate intervention and improve the course of disease 1. 2. 3. 4. Cardiogenic shock Hypovolemia - Distributive Right ventricular infarct/large PE Tamponade As a clinician → trying to choose between inotropy, fluid resuscitation, or a needle The ventricle is either moving well or not The RV is dilated or not There is an effusion or there is not The IVC is full or not The JVP is up or not Fractional shortening Look at the black (i.e. blood) in the left ventricle Systole: the black decreases in size The ↓in size with systole is fractional shortening Normal ejection fraction is ~ 60% Mathematically → single dimension (diameter rather than volume) Change of diameter ≥30% → Gr 1 fxn Change of diameter <30% → ↓LV systolic fxn LV dilatation Mid-LV diameter ≤5.2cm at end-diastole If diameter >5.2cm → LV dilatation ↓ shortening fraction LV Dilatation End-diastole → LV chamber unusually small Systole → virtually all LV blood ejected Cardiac Activity → hyperdynamic fast heart rate very vigorous contractions Ejection fraction → exceeds 70% IVC → low CVP RV is usually 2/3 the size of the LV RV function is less formally quantified (mathematically) complex shape PE → RV diameter can exceed the LV diameter Such a finding may guide diagnosis and management in the acutely dyspneic or hypotensive patient Identify the IVC: Just anterior to the spine To the right of the aorta in > 99.9%. Thin-walled (vs. the thicker-walled aorta) Compressible with pressure Size varies with respiration Diameter ≤ 1.5cm→ possibly c/w ↓CVP Diameter ≤ 1.0 cm definitely c/w ↓CVP ↑inspiratory ↑ in IVC (>25%) → ↑ chance pt is dry Methods: 84 consecutive patients referred for right-sided cardiac catheterization RA pressure was acquired Internal residents underwent 4h of formal US training and performed 20 supervised studies Blinded to cath results examined the IVC <1h before catheterization RA pressure was also estimated by JVP in 40 patients before right-sided cardiac catheterization Results: RA pressure was successfully estimated from US images of the IVC in 90% of patients, compared with 63% from JVP examination The sensitivity for predicting RA pressure >10mm Hg was 82% with US and 14% from JVP inspection …why should medicine residents have all the fun? How long does it take? Does it change what we do? Methods: Prospective, observational study 4 EP investigators with prior US experience → focused echo training A convenience sample of 51 adult pts with hypotension Exclusion criteria: History of trauma Chest compressions EKG diagnostic of acute MI Echocardiogram was recorded by an EP investigator - estimated EF and categorized LVF as normal, depressed, or severely depressed. Blinded cardiologist reviewed all 51 studies for EF, categorization of function, and quality of the study A second cardiologist reviewed 20 of the tapes to assess inter-observer variability between cardiologists Pearson’s correlation coefficient for EP and cardiologist estimation was R=0.86 Pearson’s correlation coefficient for the two cardiologists’ estimations was R=0.84 Agreement between EPs in the convenience subset of eight patients who underwent echo by two EPs yielded an R = 0.94 Methods: Prospective observational study of a convenience sample of patients admitted to ICU All patients underwent BLEEP followed by an independent formal echocardiogram by an experienced paediatric echocardiography provider (PEP) EPs had 3 hours of focused cardiac US training including 5-proctored BLEEP examinations on unenrolled patients IVC volume was assessed by measurement of the maximal diameter of the IVC LVF was determined by calculating shortening fraction (SF) Estimates of SF and IVC volume obtained on the BLEEP were compared with those obtained by the PEP Results: N=31 Mean age=5.1 years (range: 23 days–16 years) Agreement between the EP and the PEP for estimation of SF (r = 0.78) The mean difference in the estimate of SF between the providers was 4.4% (95% CI: 1.6%–7.2%) This difference in estimate of SF was not thought to be clinically significant Agreement between the EP and the PEP for estimation of IVC volume (r = 0.8). The mean difference in the estimate of IVC diameter by the PEP and the EP was 0.068 mm (95% CI: –0.16 to 0.025 mm). Conclusions: PEP sonographers are capable of accurate assessment of LVF and IVC volume BLEEP can be performed with focused training and oversight by a pediatric cardiologist Design: Randomized, controlled trial of immediate vs. delayed ultrasound. Urban, tertiary emergency department, census >100,000. Non-trauma emergency department patients, aged >17 yrs, and initial emergency department vital signs consistent with shock (SBP<100 mm Hg or shock index >1.0), and agreement of two independent observers for at least one sign and symptom of inadequate tissue perfusion Interventions: Group 1 (immediate ultrasound) received standard care plus goal-directed US at time 0 Group 2 (delayed ultrasound) received standard care for 15 min and goal-directed US b/w 15-30 min Results: Outcomes included the number of viable physician diagnoses at 15 mins and the rank of their likelihood of occurrence at both 15 and 30 mins. N=184 Group 1 (n = 88) had a smaller median number of viable diagnoses at 15 mins (median = 4) than did group 2 (n = 96, median = 9, Mann-Whitney U test, p < .0001). Physicians indicated the correct final diagnosis as most likely among their viable diagnosis list at 15 mins Group 1 80% (95% confidence interval, 70–87%) of group 1 subjects Group 2 50% (95% confidence interval, 40–60%) in group 2 ...difference of 30% (95% confidence interval, 16–42%) 7 views Each intended to answer a binary question: Pericardial effusion Pericardial tamponade Left ventricular dysfunction Right ventricular dilation Intravascular volume depletion Intraperitoneal fluid Aortic aneurysm On average, this information was obtained in < 6 min Conclusions: Incorporation of a goal-directed ultrasound protocol in the evaluation of nontraumatic, symptomatic, undifferentiated hypotension in adult patients results in fewer viable diagnostic etiologies. More accurate physician impression of final diagnosis. We can do easily We can do safely ...when you need the bariatric needle •Accurate identification of landmarks by palpation is impaired in obese patients •At least 65% of adults in the US are overweight or obese •Increasing the accuracy of landmark identification for LP may be useful Objective: Methods: 2 EPs sought to identify relevant anatomy in emergency patients Visualization time for 5 anatomical structures (spinous processes or laminae, ligamentum flavum, dura mater, epidural space, subarachnoid space), BMI, and perception of landmark palpation difficulty Results: N=76 The objective of the study was to determine EPs’ ability to apply a standardized US technique for visualizing landmarks surrounding the dural space Soft tissue and bony anatomical structures were identified in all subjects Mean BMI was 31.4 (95% confidence interval, 29.1 - 33.6). High-quality images were obtained in < 1 minute in 153 (87.9%) scans < 5 minutes in 174 (100%) scans Mean acquisition time was 57.19 seconds; SD, 68.14 seconds; range, 10 to 300 seconds. Conclusion: In this cohort, EPs were able to rapidly obtain high-quality ultrasound images relevant to lumbar puncture Methods: Results: Cross-sectional study Patients categorized by BMI Recorded the difficulty in palpating traditional LP landmarks Identification and measurement of the spatial relationships of the sacrum; spinous processes of L3, L4, L5; ligamentum flavum; and the spinal canal by US Difficulty in palpating landmarks Successful identification of pertinent structures Normal BMI - 5% Overweight – 33% Obese - 68% Normal BMI – 100% Overweight – 95% Obese -- 74% ( P = .011) In subjects with difficult-to-palpate landmarks, US identified pertinent structures in 16/21 (76%; 95%CI 53-92) The average distance from skin to ligamentum flavum was 44 mm - normal BMI 51 mm - overweight 64 mm - obese Conclusion: ( P .0001) As people get bigger they are harder to landmark Ultrasound is helpful in this population – but not perfect ...where’s the pus Cellulitis vs Abscess Abscesses may not be clinically obvious Is there an abscess? What is the best area for I&D? Are there structures near the abscess (i.e. vessels or nerves) risk? Methods: Prospective observational ED study of adult patients with clinical STI without obvious abscess The treating physician’s pretest opinions need for drainage procedures probability of subcutaneous fluid collection Emergency US of the infected area Effect on management plan was recorded Results: Ultrasound changed the management in 71/126 (56%) of cases Pretest Group believed not to need drainage - US changed management in 39/82 (48%) ▪ believed drainage to be needed, US changed the management in 32/44 (73%) ▪ (33 drained and 6 more imaging or consultation) (16 not drained and 16 more diagnostics) US had a management effect in all pretest probabilities for fluid from 10% to 90% Conclusion US changes ED management Hopefully for the better Methods: Prospective, convenience sample of adult patients with ?cellulitis +/- abscess US was performed by EPs or residents who had attended a ½h training session in soft tissue US yes/no assessment (of abscess) I&D was the standard when performed Resolution on 7d follow-up was the standard when I&D was not performed Results N=107 Clinical examination US 64/107 patients had I&D–proven abscess 17/107 had negative I&D 26/107 improved with antibiotic therapy alone (clinically negative) Sensitivity of : 86% (95% [CI] = 76% to 93%) Specificity: 70% (95% CI = 55% to 82%). Sensitivity: 98% (95% CI = 93% to 100%) Specificity was 88% (95% CI = 76% to 96%) Of 18 cases in which US disagreed with the clinical examination, US was correct in 17 (94%) (x2=14.2, p = 0.0002) Clinical examination Sensitivity of : 86% Specificity: 70% US Sensitivity: 98% Specificity was 88% Of 18 cases in which US disagreed with the clinical exam, US was correct in 17 (94% of cases with disagreement, x2 = 14.2, p = 0.0002) Conclusions: ED bedside US improves accuracy in detection of superficial abscesses 1. The probe should be perpendicular to the chest to ensure an accurate assessment of pleural fluid collection size, shape, and depth 2. Identify the diaphragm and liver or spleen 3. Slide the probe in the longitudinal plane towards the head and feet and then anterior-posterior or medial-lateral to locate the largest pocket of fluid 4. With the largest pocket of fluid in the centre of the screen, mark that point on the skin under the centre of the probe just above the lower rib 5. Rotate the probe 90o into the transverse plane. Ensure that the largest pocket of fluid is still under the centre of the probe and corresponds to the mark made on the skin 6. Note the location of the diaphragm, lung, liver and spleen, etc. Also note the depth that you could insert the needle into the fluid before hitting one of these structures 7. Preparation for thoracentesis, thoracentesis technique, and aftercare are otherwise performed in the usual fashion. Pneumothorax Solid organ insertion Dry tap – insufficient tap Donna R. Grogan; Richard S. Irwin; Richard Channick; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Frederick J. Curley; Thaddeus Bartter; R. William Corwin Prospective randomized trial (not blinded) US guided vs Needle Catheter vs Needle only Population Spontaneously breathing Cooperative patients Effusions obliterating >½ the hemidiaphragm on X-ray Results N=52 US guided – 0/19 serious complications Needle catheter – 9/18 serious complications (7PTx) Needle only – 5/15 serious complications (3PTx) Conclusion: Thoracentesis method significantly influenced complications US guided method was the safest Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(4):873-877 Objective: To determine the safety of ultrasound-guided thoracentesis performed by critical care physicians on patients receiving mechanical ventilation Design: Prospective and observational Setting: ICUs in a teaching hospital Patients: 211 serial patients receiving mechanical ventilation with pleural effusion requiring diagnostic or therapeutic thoracentesis Interventions: 232 separate USTs were performed by critical care physicians without radiology support. AP CXRs were reviewed for possible post-procedure pneumothorax Results: PTx occurred in 3/232 USTs (1.3%) Conclusions: UST performed in patients receiving mechanical ventilation without radiology support results in an acceptable rate of pneumothorax Paracentesis is performed for diagnostic and therapeutic reasons Complications - rare Bowel perforation Artery puncture US makes paracentesis safer and ↓ dry taps Is there fluid in the abdomen? 1. 2. Slide the probe caudally down the flank Identify the ideal site of insertion by following the fluid with your probe in all directions. Chose the largest pocket of fluid, away from the bowel, liver, spleen, and bladder 3. 4. Once the largest pocket of fluid has been identified the site of insertion is marked with indelible ink Paracentesis is performed as usual Study objective: To determine if emergency center ultrasound (ECUS) can be of value to emergency physicians in the evaluation of possible ascites and accompanying decisions to perform emergent paracentesis. Methods: Randomized ED Study Inclusion:≥18 yrs, suspected of having ascites and potentially requiring paracentesis Exclusion: kids and pregnant women Randomized to traditional or US-assisted paracentesis – coin toss Participating physicians had received a minimum of 1 hour of formal didactic ultrasound training Results: 100 enrolled patients 56 received the ECUS-assisted technique. Of 42 patients with ascites, 40 (95%) were successfully aspirated and 14 (25%) did not receive paracentesis because no ascites or insignificant amount of ascites was visualized. One patient was noted to have a large cystic mass in the left lower quadrant and another patient had a ventral hernia. Of the 44 patients randomized to the traditional technique, 27 (61%) were successfully aspirated. In 17 (39%) of these patients, fluid could not be obtained using traditional methods. Of these 17 failed attempts by traditional methods, 15 patients received ECUS in a break from the study protocol Ascitic fluid was obtained in 13 of these 15 patients; of the 2 remaining patients, 1 did not have enough fluid to be sampled and the other had no fluid visualized. Did it help? avoid complications Increase efficiency Enhance knowledge of anatomy 1AM at FMC Elderly gentleman presents with urinary retntion Foley can’t be passed Urology is helpful over the phone but doesn’t want to see tonight EDE ensures that the bladder is large enough to access and that there is no bowel in the way of your target 1. Place the probe in the midline just above the symphysis pubis in the longitudinal plane with the indicator pointed towards the head 2. Aim the beam into the pelvis by tilting the probe caudally 3. 4. Identify the bladder in transverse and longitudal planes Note the overall shape and dimensions of the bladder Mark the overlying skin Perform aspiration-catheterization in the usual manner Prospective case series 17 consecutive patients Acute urinary outflow obstruction Urethral cath was not possible or contraindicated Intervention: Emergent real-time ultrasound-guided suprapubic cystostomy in the ED Results: Successful 17/17 (100%, 90–100% CI: 95%) cases 1st pass 17/17 Technically challenging 4/17 No complications reported – 2week FU A peripheral vein will look like a small IVC Thin-walled Black Circular structure Non-pulsatile Compressible with very little pressure Look with US in both forearms for a target If no good vein is visible, move to upper arm Methods: Prospective, randomized study of all adult patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) between June and December 2007. Inclusion criteria were failed nursing attempts at peripheral access (at least three) EPs were 2nd- or 3rd-year residents who had previously performed > five EJs and USIVs Randomized into either an initial EJ or USIV approach. Results: 60 pts enrolled 32 in the ultrasound group 28 in the EJ group Initial Success: USIV 84% (95% CI 68–93%) vs. EJ 50% (95% CI 33–67%) p 0.006 Success if EJ visible: USIV 84% vs. EJ 66% (p 0.18) Overall success (including crossover): 41 lines were successfully placed by US out of 46 attempts (89%) vs. 18 out of 33 for EJ (55%), p 0.001 Total: 59/60 patients (98%) had a peripheral IV successfully placed Rob Hall Kyle McLaughlin X-rays are pretty good Possibility of detecting hematoma and periosteal elevation in subtle fractures Decrease radiation load Convenience Double Blinded Randomized Educational Study 13 EPs / 4ER US fellows / 2 Residents 24 chicken drumsticks (14 c # and 10 c/o) Each given a 2 min tutorial on fracture ID Results 312 exams Sensitivity 91% (CI 85%-95%) Specificity84% (CI 76%-89%) Study Design Prospective, blinded, convenience sample study over a 7 month period from May - Nov 2004 An urban peds ED Methods: A bedside ultrasound of the forearm bones was performed by a PEM physician US findings were compared with X-ray findings Reductions were performed under US guidance Post reduction X-rays were performed Any need for further reduction was recorded Results: N=68 patients Radiographs revealed forearm fractures in 48 patients Fractures of radius, ulna, and both U/S identified all patients with fractures U/S revealed the correct type and location of the fracture in 46 patients (2 missed) Sensitivity 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89%–100%) Specificity was 100% (95% CI, 83%–100%) 26 subjects underwent reduction of their fractures in the ED 2 subjects required re-reduction after the initial reduction The initial success rate of ultrasound-guided reduction was 92% (95% CI, 75%–99%) Methods: After one hour of standardized training, physicians with minimal US experience clinically evaluated patients presenting with pain and trauma to the upper arm or leg The investigators then performed a long-bone US evaluation, recording their impression of fracture presence or absence Results were compared with X-ray or CT Results: N=58 patients Physical examination Ultrasound Sensitivity 78.6% Specificity 90.0% Sensitivity 92.9% Specificity 83.3% US provided improved sensitivity with less specificity compared with physical examination in the detection of fractures in long bones. Conclusion: Author: US by minimally trained clinicians may be used to rule out a long-bone fracture in patients with a medium to low probability of fracture Improves on clinical exam HPI: An 18-month-old boy presented to the ER after a fall 24h previously. Refusing to bear weight on the right leg since the fall. OE: afebrile, comfortable at rest, and reluctant to transfer weight through his right leg. There was no swelling, bruising, or deformity visible, and his range of motion was normal. There was no focal tenderness, but the examining physician was unable to rule out lower leg tenderness because of inconsistent responses from the child. X-Ray... Diagnosis: soft tissue trauma Management: Analgesia medications 72-hour review was arranged 72h Follow-up: the child was still non-weight-bearing trouble sleeping *Peri-osteal elevation with underlying fracture hematoma The leg was immobilized in an above knee cast 2 week follow-up: plain X-ray demonstrated healing oblique fracture of the distal tibia * Healing fracture Reduction assessment 8 year girl was referred from the periphery for evaluation of a forearm fracture The patient had fallen at play about 4h earlier OE: obvious deformity of the distal forearm N/V exam normal Skin intact American Journal of Emergency Medicine - Volume 18, Issue 1 (January 2000) After good anesthesia had been achieved, the EP attempted to reduce the fracture using manipulation, traction, and counter-traction Swelling of the forearm made it difficult to evaluate the reduction clinically ...repeat US While anesthesia was still in place and before casting, a second reduction was performed Repeat US Hennepin County Medical Center Training video Confirmation of tube placement Methods: 13 patients requiring elective intubation under GA, and data from two trauma patients were evaluated. Using a portable, hand-held, ultrasound machine, sonographic recordings of the chest wall visceral-parietal pleural interface (VPPI) were recorded bilaterally in each patient during all phases of airway management: (1) preoxygenation; (2) induction; (3) paralysis; (4) intubation; and (5) ventilation. Results: The VPPI could be well-imaged for all of the patients. In the two trauma patients, right mainstem intubations were noted in which specific pleural signals were not seen in the left chest wall VPPI after tube placement. These signs returned after correct repositioning of the ETT tube. I All of the elective surgery patients, signs correlating with bilateral ventilation in each patient were imaged and correlated with confirmation of ETT placement by anesthesiology. Conclusions: US may be another tool to confirm ETT placement US may have merit in extreme environments, such as in remote, prehospital settings or during aerospace medical transports, in which auscultation is impossible due to noise, or capnography is not available Requires further evaluation Methods: Real-time B-mode ultrasound imaging was performed in 24 intubated patients in order to confirm the correct placement of ET tubes The large acoustic impedance mismatch between the air within the ET tube cuff and the tracheal wall could be bypassed by (1) use of a foam-cuffed Bivona ET tube (2) cuff inflation with saline instead of air Optimal repositioning of the endotracheal tube could be done under direct visualization Imaging of the foam-filled and saline-filled cuffs was easier in the longitudinal (sagittal) than in the transverse view, was enhanced by a slight longitudinal to-and-fro motion of the tube Cases of esophageal intubation were not considered Conclusion: Use of a noninvasive imaging modality such as ultrasound will spare selected patients from the radiation exposure associated with a chest x-ray This is of value in pregnant patients and in those requiring frequent chest radiographs for the sole purpose of confirming correct ET tube placement Objective. Determining the correct position of ET tubes in critically ill patients may be complicated by external factors such as noise, body habitus, and the need for ongoing resuscitation Methods We describe the sonographic findings in a case series of endobronchial main stem intubations and obstruction, highlighting the utility of this sonographic application. Results US detection of the sliding lung sign, the lung pulse, and diaphragmatic excursion can accurately detect main stem bronchial intubation as well as bronchial obstruction Conclusions. Clinical use of lung sonography may decrease the need for chest radiography and may allow more rapid diagnosis of main stem intubation and bronchial obstruction. J Ultrasound Med 27:785-789 • 0278-4297 Methods: Cross-sectional observational study Convenience sample of patients presenting to the ED between Sept 2000 - Feb 2001 EP sonographers who had undergone a 3h training session in limited echocardiography, focusing on LVEF and CVP measurement, performed echocardiograms LVEF was rated as poor (<30%), moderate (30%–55%), or normal (>55%) and an absolute % CVP categories included low (<5 cm), moderate (5–10 cm), and high (>10 cm). Formal echocardiograms were obtained within a four-hour window on all patients and interpreted by a staff cardiologist Results: A total of 115 patients were assessed for LVEF, and 94 patients had complete information for CVP Indications for echocardiography included chest pain (45.1%), CHF (38.1%), dyspnea (5.7%), and endocarditis (10.6%). LVEF correlation of r=0.712 with 86.1% overall agreement. Subgroup analysis revealed the highest agreement (92.3%) between EP and formal echocardiograms within the normal LVEF category, followed by 70.4% agreement in the poor LVEF category and 47.8% in the moderate LVEF category. CVP measurements resulted in 70.2% overall raw agreement between EP and formal echocardiograms. Subgroup analysis revealed the highest agreement (83.3%) within the high CVP category followed by 66.6% in the moderate and 20% in the low categories. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study, Convenience sample of patients presenting to the ED between Sept 2000 - Feb 2001 Level III – credentialed EP sonographers who had undergone a three hour training session in limited echocardiography, focusing on LVEF and CVP measurement, performed echocardiograms. LVEF was rated as poor (<30%), moderate (30%–55%), or normal (>55%) and an absolute % CVP categories included low (<5 cm), moderate (5–10 cm), and high (>10 cm). Formal echocardiograms were obtained within a four-hour window on all patients and interpreted by a staff cardiologist. Results: A total of 115 patients were assessed for LVEF, and 94 patients had complete information for CVP. Indications for echocardiography included chest pain (45.1%), CHF (38.1%), dyspnea (5.7%), and endocarditis (10.6%). LVEF correlation of r=0.712 with 86.1% overall agreement. Subgroup analysis revealed the highest agreement (92.3%) between EP and formal echocardiograms within the normal LVEF category, followed by 70.4% agreement in the poor LVEF category and 47.8% in the moderate LVEF category. Central venous pressure measurements resulted in 70.2% overall raw agreement between EP and formal echocardiograms. Subgroup analysis revealed the highest agreement (83.3%) within the high CVP category followed by 66.6% in the moderate and 20% in the low categories. Conclusions: Experienced EP sonographers with a small amount of focused additional training in limited bedside echocardiography can assess LVEF accurately in the ED