Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Species conservation strategies Shorea lumutensis: genetic variation and conservation David Boshier, and SL Lee Balau Putih – White Balau © SL Lee Shorea lumutensis Sub-sessile fruits with three outer and two inner wings © SL Lee Small hermaphrodite flowers © SL Lee © SL Lee Endemic to Peninsular Malaysia Shorea lumutensis is restricted to Manjung District, Peninsular Malaysia, and confined to five forest reserves. Endangered as distribution restricted & habitat potentially threatened by human activities. Dry coastal hill dipterocarp forests on moderate-fertility soils, in microclimates where drainage is good or where high soil moisture levels cannot be permanently maintained © SL Lee The number of large trees was estimated to be < 500 for these five populations Threat – logging activities (Segari Melintang FR) © SL Lee Threat – excavation of stone (quarry) & conversion to oil palm plantation (Teluk Muroh FR) © SL Lee Threat – Land development for tourism (Pangkor Selatan & Sg. Pinang FRs) © SL Lee Need for research • Little was known about the biology of S. lumutensis • Research aimed to assess the population ecology and population genetics to elucidate specific ecological and genetic requirements for the species’ existence … • … In order to subsequently develop conservation strategies Population dynamics Relatedness among population Demographic structure Gene flow & mating system Ecological studies Genetic studies Population survey Flowering biology Germination & seedling studies Effective breeding unit Minimum viable population size • Total of 416 individuals >1 cm dbh recorded within 8ha plot 200 160 (m) 120 80 40 0 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 (m) • Density of S. lumutensis >30 cm dbh within plot, 4.4 trees/ha Large number of seedlings scattered around the mature tree © SL Lee © SL Lee Short-term population dynamics (2001-2004) • 75 trees died over the 3-year study period • Mortality was detected only at the two lowest-sized classes • Growth was slow - 0.3mm/yr to 2.4 mm/yr Seedling performance One-year old © SL Lee Two-year old © SL Lee Conservation alternatives • Preservation of actual diversity • Conservation of evolutionary potential • Mantain options for future generations, while satisfying present needs How big is “big enough”? • 50/500 rule (Franklin 1980) • 50 - inbreeding depression to acceptable level • 500 - sufficient for new variation from mutation to replace that lost by genetic drift • refers to effective population size (Ne) rather than survey numbers (N) – so may need many more! • in trees Ne smaller than N due to: overlapping generations, dioecy, asynchronous flowering, fecundity differences between individuals Where should we conserve? In situ - Ex situ In situ - reserve system of undisturbed, protected areas within natural distribution (ecosystem based) Ex situ - artificial maintenance of populations outside natural distribution (species based) 15 Conservation of biodiversity in situ : trees as a paradigm Ideal reserve model Emphasis: large, continuous, protected areas Limitations: location, size, security, biology: – – – – Movement of animals Extensive distribution of many species Gene flow between populations Upland, non agricultural areas Essential but not sufficient 16 Conservation of biodiversity ex situ : methods and limitations seed banks - problems of regeneration plantations - changes in gene frequencies, few populations botanical gardens - deficiencies for gene pool conservation 17 © RBG Kew © RBG Kew Conservation of biodiversity ex situ : methods and limitations - useful, but resources limit application to few species (usually commercial) - last gasp holding for highly endangered species - complementary to other approaches Conservation of alleles • common - rare what proportion? • widespread - localised what scale? common rare (<0.05) widespread easy sample size localised key luck Widespread vs locally common alleles Allele a b c d Pop 1 0.500 0.250 0.230 0.020 frequency 2 3 0.320 0.450 0.030 0.050 0.400 0.450 0.250 0.050 4 0.550 0.050 0.350 0.050 Figure 2: Dendrogram of genetic similarities between the five populations of Shorea lumutensis (bootstrap % values on branches based on 1000 replications). Table 3. Geographic distance (in km) for the five S. lumutensis populations. How many conservation areas are required? Exists in five populations <500 large trees High levels of genetic diversity Low population differentiation Conservation strategies: in situ conservation? • Selection of in situ gene conservation areas • How many conservation areas are required? • How large does each conservation area need to be? • How should conservation areas be designed? • Monitoring? • Management? Conservation strategies: ex situ conservation? • How? • Where? • Who? Shorea lumutensis each group summarize on wall chart paper or PowerPoint Remember need a conservation objective prioritise actions – resources are limited list the localised but common alleles? list problems by type - genetic, which pops. too small? which are different? - other types of problems which conservation methods - in situ, ex situ? who? will do, what? where? how will you pay for it? © SL Lee © SL Lee © SL Lee Ghazali Jaafar, Yahya Marhani, Mariam Din and Sharifah Talib for field and technical assistance. The late Baya Busu, Ramli Punyoh, Mustapa Data, Ayau Kanir, Apok Kassim and Angan Atan for field assistance Pn. Hamidah Mamat (FRIM) helped draw the maps. © SL Lee © SL Lee © SL Lee