Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
(very short) theory Based on total scattering data, which include Bragg diffraction and the diffuse contribution arising from disordered features, PDF methods are particularly valuable in the structural analysis of nanoscale and disordered (crystalline and non-crystalline) systems, for example, glass, liquid, amorphous, nanocrystalline, heterogeneous and crystalline materials. The PDF technique recovers structural information in the form of a distribution of atomic distances and thus does not rely on the assumption of translational invariance that traditional crystallographic methods apply. A diffraction experiment is designed to measure the total scattering as a function of scattering vector Q: where and are the wave-vectors of the incident and scattered particles. A key experimental criterion for obtaining quantitative PDFs is to be able to measure the structure function to large values of Q with sufficient statistics. Unfortunately, it’s not directly accessible from the scattering experiment, but can be deduced from the experimental patterns after suitable corrections for polarization, absorption, inelastic scattering, multiple scattering, static approximation, and after normalization to absolute units. The term is related to the elastic part of the total diffracted intensity by the following expression: where , and are respectively the atomic concentration, average (over isotopes and spin states) of the neutron-nucleus scattering length, and mean square scattering length of element a. In the x-ray case a, which is with in the equation is replaced by , the atomic scattering factor of element dependent. The pair distribution function is given by the Fourier transform of total atomic number density of the sample: , Note that the integration is defined over all the -space (0 to ∞). In practice, the diffraction measurements are carried out over finite -range. The Fourier transform between 0 and leads to broader peaks and non-physical oscillations in . This effect of truncation can be reduced by convoluting structure factor with a modification function at which decreases to 0 . The most known are Lorch function and the square step function. In the case of multi-component system the structure factor can be generalized as a sum of weighted independent contributions arisen from the different correlations, where and are the atomic species: and are the concentrations, and are the scattering length values, as described previously. In the case of x-ray diffraction, the scattering lengths are replaced by the -dependent form factors. These weighting factors determine the extent to which different pairs contributes to neutron/x-ray structure factors. Moreover the comparison of x-ray and neutron measurements provides the additional information about the origin of the diffraction peaks. If we take the example of Ge-S glass with 35.71 at. % of Ge. The x-ray weighting factors for the GeGe, Ge-S and S-S are 0.2768, 0.4986 and 0.2245 (as evaluated from the form factor values at = 0), while those with neutrons are 0.3781, 0.4736 and 0.1483, respectively. From the definitions given earlier, it follows that the correlation involving two Ge atoms emphasized in to relative , while S-S correlations are deemphasized. In the same way the pair distribution function in the real space can also be written as a weighted sum of partial distribution functions with the same weighting factors. Each partial radial distribution function can be integrated allowing the definition of the coordination number: where is always the total atomic number density. We note that the number is symmetric , since by definition pair distribution function describes the probability to find a atom at a distance r from an atom (and vice versa). (overview of) data analysis The coherent scattering per atom is deduced from the experimental scattering data. A number of different corrections must be applied depending on the radiation and geometry used in the experiment. The data from neutron experiment is corrected for background and container scattering, self-attenuation, multiple scattering, and inelasticity effects to give the total structure factor . To obtain a sample’s cross section it is necessary to subtract the intensities from the sample container, the sample environment and the background. Therefore additional measurements of container and/or environment and the background are needed. In the next step one should take in account the attenuation and multiple scattering. The multiple scattering contributes to the background and can be calculated analytically. By the calculation of the attenuation one should pay attention to geometry of the sample. Furthermore, the intensities must be corrected with so-called Placzek corrections, for the departures from the static approximation. Finally the normalization to the absolute units can be done by using the measurements from a vanadium sample of the same configuration, because In the case of x-rays one should consider various processes: Elastic scattering Compton scattering (with usual simplification as mono energetic) Fluorescence resonant Raman scattering (that is negligible, until one treat anomalous scattering) Multiple scattering The steps needed in analyzing the data are similar to the ones used for neutrons. The corrections for container/background scattering, sample self-attenuation and multiple scattering are done in the same manner as in the case with the neutrons. One should just replace the total attenuation factors of neutrons with x-ray absorptions ones. In addition, when using the x-ray as a radiation probe, one must correct the intensities with the polarization factor. The further differences lie in atomic form factors that are Q-dependent, inelasticity corrections (Compton scattering) and the normalization procedure. The values for atomic scattering factors and the Compton scattering cross sections as a function of Q can be found in several tables. Finally the normalization to the absolute units is done directly from the scattering pattern. Measured intensities at high-Q values show very small modulations about the value the normalization constant. . So from this behavior one can determine