* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Real-Time MR Imaging of Aortic Flow: Influence of Breathing on Left
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Jatene procedure wikipedia , lookup
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup
Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Radiology Cardiac Imaging Rik J. van den Hout, MD† Hildo J. Lamb, PhD Joost G. van den Aardweg, MD Robert Schot, BSc Paul Steendijk, PhD Ernst E. van der Wall, MD Jeroen J. Bax, MD Albert de Roos, MD Index terms: Aorta, flow dynamics, 941.129416 Aorta, MR, 941.129416 Emphysema, 60.751 Heart, function, 52.619, 52.719 Heart, MR, 52.121416, 52.12144 Published online before print 10.1148/radiol.2292020559 Radiology 2003; 229:513–519 Abbreviations: COPD ⫽ chronic obstructive pulmonary disease SV ⫽ stroke volume 1 From the Departments of Radiology (R.J.v.d.H., H.J.L., E.E.v.d.W., A.d.R.), Pulmonology (J.G.v.d.A., R.S.), and Cardiology (P.S., J.J.B.), Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands. From the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received May 15, 2002; revision requested July 15; final revision received February 12, 2003; accepted March 28. Address correspondence to H.J.L. (e-mail: [email protected]). † Deceased. Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, R.J.v.d.H., H.J.L., J.G.v.d.A., A.d.R.; study concepts and design, R.J.v.d.H., H.J.L., J.G.v.d.A., R.S., A.d.R.; literature research, R.J.v.d.H., H.J.L., J.G.v.d.A., J.J.B., A.d.R.; clinical studies, R.J.v.d.H., H.J.L., J.G.v.d.A., R.S., J.J.B., A.d.R., P.S.; data acquisition, R.J.v.d.H., H.J.L., J.G.v.d.A., R.S.; data analysis/interpretation, all authors; statistical analysis, R.J.v.d.H., H.J.L., J.G.v.d.A., A.d.R.; manuscript preparation and definition of intellectual content, all authors; manuscript editing, R.J.v.d.H., H.J.L., J.G.v.d.A., P.S., J.J.B., A.d.R.; manuscript revision/review, and final version approval, all authors © RSNA, 2003 Real-Time MR Imaging of Aortic Flow: Influence of Breathing on Left Ventricular Stroke Volume in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease1 PURPOSE: To assess real-time changes of left ventricular stroke volume (SV) in relation to the breathing pattern in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Real-time magnetic resonance (MR) imaging flow measurements were performed in the ascending aorta of 10 healthy volunteers and nine patients with severe COPD. Breathing maneuvers were registered with an abdominal pressure belt, which was synchronized to the electrocardiographic signal and the flow measurement. Healthy subjects performed normal breathing, deep breathing, and the Valsalva maneuver. Patients with COPD performed spontaneous breathing. Paired two-tailed Student t tests were used in healthy volunteers to assess significant SV differences between normal breathing and deep breathing or the Valsalva maneuver. The results of measurements in the patients with COPD were compared with the results during normal breathing in healthy subjects with the unpaired two-tailed Student t test. RESULTS: In healthy subjects, SV decreased during inspiration and increased during expiration (r2 ⫽ 0.78, P ⬍ .05). When compared with the SV during normal breathing, mean SV did not change during deep breathing but declined during the Valsalva maneuver (P ⬍ .05). The difference between minimal and maximal SVs (ie, SV range) increased because of deep breathing or the Valsalva maneuver (P ⬍ .05). In normal and deep breathing, velocity of SV elevation and velocity of SV decrease were equal (which resulted in a ratio of 1), whereas during the Valsalva maneuver, this value increased (P ⬍ .05). Spontaneous breathing in COPD resulted in SV changes (P ⬍ .05) similar to those observed in healthy subjects who performed the Valsalva maneuver. CONCLUSION: Real-time MR imaging of aortic flow reveals physiologic flow alterations, which are dependent on variations in the breathing pattern. © RSNA, 2003 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has a high prevalence and morbidity and is often associated with severe hemodynamic consequences (1). In patients with COPD, expiratory intrathoracic pressures can be increased as a result of expiratory obstruction (2). These pressure changes have a distinct influence on cardiac function (3). In combination with other factors, such as hypoxemia and pulmonary hypertension, the heart is subject to chronic hemodynamic and metabolic stress (4). Intrathoracic blood flow toward and away from the heart is influenced by the cyclic pressure changes that occur as a result of breathing (Fig 1). The variations in intrathoracic pressure cause changes in caval flow affect the filling of the right ventricle (5). The 513 TABLE 1 Subject Characteristics Radiology Characteristic Body surface area (m2) Heart rate (beats per minute) Forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (percentage predicted)* PaO2 (mm Hg) PaCO2 (mm Hg) Healthy Subjects (n ⫽ 10) Patients with COPD (n ⫽ 9) 1.9 ⫾ 0.1 70.4 ⫾ 14.8 1.9 ⫾ 0.1 72.2 ⫾ 11.1 ... ... ... 294.7 ⫾ 78.9 71.4 ⫾ 6.8 39.8 ⫾ 4.5 Note.—Values are expressed as mean ⫾ SD. Body surface area and heart rate did not differ between groups (P ⬎ .05). * This value is presented as a percentage of the predicted value for a healthy subject of the same age, height, and sex and expresses bronchial obstruction. difference between the changing intrathoracic pressure and the constant extrathoracic pressure also has an effect on the left side of the heart by means of alteration of the afterload (3). As a result of ventricular interdependency, the changing right ventricular load influences filling of the left ventricle and vice versa (6). In previous studies with echocardiography, scintigraphy, and catheters, researchers (7–9) evaluated the influence of either inspiration or expiration on cardiac function. Researchers in few studies were concerned with the immediate effect of complete respiratory cycles on left ventricular stroke volume (SV), but investigators in none of these studies focused on patients with obstructive pulmonary disease (3,7). The use of echocardiography to assess instantaneous changes in aortic flow is particularly limited in patients with emphysema because of limited acoustic windows (10). Recently, magnetic resonance (MR) flow imaging measurements became possible in real time, and this imaging allows assessment of the interaction between cardiac hemodynamics and breathing (11). Accordingly, the purpose of the present study was to assess real-time changes of left ventricular SV in relation to the breathing pattern in healthy subjects and in patients with COPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS Subjects and Study Design Ten randomly selected healthy volunteers who were nonsmokers (four women, six men; age range, 21–30 years) and nine consecutive men (age range, 65–73 years) who met our criteria for severe COPD (emphysema and/or chronic bronchitis; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 39.2 percentage predicted ⫾ 10.5 [SD]; reversibility, ⬍12%) were included in the present 514 䡠 Radiology 䡠 November 2003 study (Table 1). Two patients were current smokers (⬎15 cigarettes per day, ⬎25 packyears) and seven were former heavy smokers (⬎15 cigarettes per day, ⬎15 packyears) who stopped smoking more then 9 years prior to entering this study (each patient smoked ⬎25 pack-years). The volunteers and the patients underwent a physical examination that included auscultation, and their clinical history was explored to exclude any concomitant disease. All subjects gave informed consent to participate in the protocol that was approved by the medical ethics committee of our institution. Real-Time MR Imaging of Flow Subjects were examined by using an MR unit (ACS/NT 15; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) with gradients of 25 mT/m and 100 mT/m/msec (Powertrak 6000; Philips Medical Systems). A real-time nonelectrocardiographically triggered gradient-echo echo-planar imaging phase-contrast technique was used, with application of two precordial elements of a five-element cardiac synergy coil. Imaging parameters included the following: 8.1/4.1 (repetition time msec/echo time msec), 10-mm section thickness, 80 ⫻ 44 matrix, 250 ⫻ 150-mm field of view, 3.1 ⫻ 3.4-mm inplane spatial resolution, echo-planar imaging factor of 7, 20° flip angle, and a temporal resolution of 49 msec per heart phase. A total of 612 images were acquired in a total examination time of approximately 30 seconds. Velocity encoding was 200 cm/sec, and the imaging plane was placed perpendicular to the vertical part of the ascending aorta. Study Protocol Real-time MR imaging of flow was performed during normal breathing, deep Figure 1. Diagram illustrates the sequence of hemodynamic events during inspiration. Interaction between intrathoracic pressure (Pthor) and right (RV) and left (LV) ventricle is shown. For clarity, atria are not depicted. In the following explanation of the sequence, 3 ⫽ leads to, 2 ⫽ decrease, and 1 ⫽ increase. Inspiration 3 intrathoracic pressure 23 gradient with extrathoracic pressure 13 inferior vena cava (VCI) flow 13 right ventricular filling volume and pressure (P&V) 13 right ventricular SV 13 aortic pulmonary flow (A. PULM) 13 blood pooling in lungs because of increased vascular capacity 3 ventricular pulmonary flow (V. PULM) 23 left ventricular filling volume and pressure 23 left ventricular SV 23 aortic flow 2. Note that increased right ventricular filling also causes shifting of the interventricular septum toward the left ventricle, compromising left ventricular filling and contraction. Note that during expiration the opposite occurs and left ventricular SV 1. breathing, and the Valsalva maneuver in healthy subjects. In patients with COPD, real-time MR imaging flow measurements were performed during only spontaneous breathing because they were not able to perform the maneuvers in a controlled way. Within the control group, the breathing maneuvers were compared with spontaneous breathing to investigate the influence of different breathing maneuvers on SV. To determine the influence of expiratory obstruction on SV, spontaneous breathing in patients with COPD was compared with spontaneous breathing in healthy control subjects. The breathing pattern was registered by using the standard abdominal pressure belt of the imaging unit. The electrocardiographic signal and the breathing curve were tapped from the imaging unit and were recorded simultaneously by using a data acquisition software program (Conduct-PC; CDLeycom, Zoetermeer, van den Hout et al Radiology Figure 2. Images in a healthy 25-year-old man. A, Modulus and phase images of real-time MR flow imaging in the ascending aorta are displayed and resulted in the corresponding flow peak, as illustrated. B, Simultaneous real-time recording of flow in the ascending aorta. C, Breathing curve (gray line) and SV curve (black line with data points). Calculated SVs for all flow peaks result in the SV curve. SV acceleration (SVacc) and SV deceleration (SVdec) are indicated with dotted black lines. These lines demonstrate the mean slope of the ascending and descending curve. a.u. ⫽ arbitrary units. D, Electrocardiographic signal. the Netherlands). The MR imaging flow acquisitions were synchronized with the breathing curve and the electrocardiographic signal by one author (R.J.v.d.H.). The patients with COPD underwent rouVolume 229 䡠 Number 2 tine pulmonary function tests (flow-volume testing before and after salbutamol administration) and arterial blood gas analysis within 2 weeks before the MR imaging examination. Data Analysis MR imaging flow measurements were analyzed by using a software package (Flow; Medis, Leiden, the Netherlands). Real-Time MR Imaging of Aortic Flow 䡠 515 Radiology The area under every flow peak in the flow-time curve was then determined by an author (R.J.v.d.H.) and represents SV of the left ventricle. A data analysis software program (CircLab; GTX Medical Software, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands) was used to display the simultaneously recorded MR imaging flow acquisition, breathing curve, and electrocardiographic signal. The calculated SVs were plotted at the time points of the corresponding aortic flow peak to demonstrate the correlation between SVs and the phase of inspiration and expiration. For five healthy control subjects, SV was plotted versus breathing phase, and the correlation coefficient was calculated. The created sequence of changing SVs during a breathing maneuver was then analyzed (R.J.v.d.H.). The average minimal SV and the average maximal SV during inspiration and expiration were calculated. In addition, the difference between the averaged minimal and maximal SVs was calculated and yielded the SV range, and the mean value of all SVs was determined. The mean slope of the SV curve between a minimum and the consecutive maximum was calculated and was called SV acceleration. The mean slope of a decrease in SV was called SV deceleration. The SV ratio was obtained by dividing the SV acceleration by the SV deceleration that followed it. Statistical Analysis Paired two-tailed Student t tests were used to assess significant SV differences between normal breathing and deep breathing or the Valsalva maneuver in the group of healthy volunteers. The results of measurements in the patients with COPD were compared with measurements during normal breathing in control subjects by using an unpaired two-tailed Student t test. A difference with P ⬍ .05 was considered statistically significant. All parameters were expressed as the mean ⫾ SD. RESULTS Figure 2 demonstrates how SV was calculated from the area under the flow curve of the ascending aorta. Figure 3 shows a typical example of each breathing maneuver for a healthy subject. Ventilatory movements were registered with a respiratory belt and were expressed in arbitrary units. The upslope represents inspiration, and the downslope represents expiration. Note the greater changes of SV during deep 516 䡠 Radiology 䡠 November 2003 Figure 3. Graphs of typical breathing maneuvers performed by the same subject as in Figure 2. Gray line represents the breathing curve. Black line is the SV curve, with each data point representing an SV value. Dotted horizontal line represents mean SV. This value does not differ between normal and deep breathing. a.u. ⫽ arbitrary units. A, Normal breathing. Note that SV increases with expiration and decreases with inspiration. B, Deep breathing. Note the exaggerated effect of an SV increase with expiration and an SV decrease with inspiration. C, Valsalva maneuver. Note a sudden increase in SV followed by a slow decrease in SV. Figure 4. Graph shows correlation between thoracic excursion (inspiration or expiration) and SV during normal breathing in the same subject as in Figure 2. Each data point represents an SV value. Note that SV decreases from end-expiration toward end-inspiration (r2 ⫽ 0.77, P ⬍ .05). For the whole group, mean r2 ⫽ 0.78 ⫾ 0.09. a.u. ⫽ arbitrary units. breathing (Fig 3, B) and the sudden increase followed by a slow decrease of SV during the Valsalva maneuver (Fig 3, C). The correlation between thoracic excursion and SV was assessed for normal breathing. Figure 4 shows a typical exam- ple of the correlation, which was high for all participating healthy subjects (mean r2 ⫽ 0.78 ⫾ 0.09). Inspiration causes an instantaneous decrease of left ventricular SV followed by an increase during the expiration that followed it. van den Hout et al parison of the gray areas in Figure 5. Figure 6 summarizes all differences between healthy subjects and patients with COPD. TABLE 2 Changes in SV as a Function of Breathing Pattern in Healthy Subjects and Patients with COPD Radiology Healthy Subjects SV Parameter Normal Breathing Deep Breathing Valsalva Maneuver Patients with COPD* Minimal (mL) Maximal (mL) Range (mL) Mean (mL) Acceleration-deceleration ratio§ 78.8 ⫾ 18.2 91.9 ⫾ 18.6 13.1 ⫾ 2.7 86.0 ⫾ 18.2 1.0 ⫾ 0.5 69.1 ⫾ 15.7† 104.4 ⫾ 17.5† 35.3 ⫾ 8.3† 87.4 ⫾ 15.5 1.1 ⫾ 0.3 44.1 ⫾ 20.5† 111.5 ⫾ 25.3† 67.4 ⫾ 20.5† 78.4 ⫾ 20.3† 4.1 ⫾ 1.5† 50.1 ⫾ 4.7‡ 69.6 ⫾ 6.1‡ 19.5 ⫾ 5.6‡ 61.1 ⫾ 5.8‡ 1.8 ⫾ 0.6‡ * Patients performed spontaneous breathing. † P ⬍ .05, paired two-tailed Student t test, compared with normal breathing. ‡ P ⬍ .05, unpaired two-tailed Student t test, compared with normal breathing of healthy subjects. § Acceleration signifies the mean slope of the increase in SV from a minimum to the consecutive maximum in the SV-versus-time graph (see Fig 2); deceleration signifies the mean slope of the decrease in SV from a maximum to the consecutive minimum in the SV-versus-time graph. DISCUSSION Findings Results of this study show that realtime MR imaging of aortic flow reveals instantaneous changes in aortic flow related to breathing. These changes were studied during normal and deep breathing, as well as during the Valsalva maneuver, in healthy subjects. The findings observed during spontaneous breathing in healthy subjects were compared with those observed in patients with COPD. Patients with COPD may have a breathing pattern that deviates from that of normal sinusoidal breathing. This altered breathing pattern affects cardiac function. In this real-time MR imaging study, significant alterations in aortic flow that resulted from expiratory obstruction were demonstrated in patients with COPD when they were compared with healthy subjects. This real-time MR imaging technique may become useful for assessment of the hemodynamic reaction to various treatment strategies (12). Real-Time Flow Imaging Figure 5. Graph shows SV curves of the same subject as in Figure 2 and of a 69-year-old man with COPD obtained during spontaneous breathing. Curve obtained in patient with COPD is in all aspects at a lower level, the range between minimal and maximal SV is wider (compare gray areas), and the acceleration-deceleration ratio of SV is higher as compared with values in the healthy subject. For all healthy subjects, mean SV range is 13.1 mL ⫾ 2.7, and for the patients with COPD, the range is 19.5 mL ⫾ 5.6 (P ⬍ .05). The accelerationdeceleration ratio is 1.0 ⫾ 0.5 in healthy subjects and 1.8 ⫾ 0.6 in patients with COPD. SVacc ⫽ SV acceleration, SVdec ⫽ SV deceleration. During the three breathing maneuvers, different values for the SV parameters were observed (Table 2). During deep breathing and the Valsalva maneuver, minimal and maximal values differed significantly from those observed during normal breathing (P ⬍ .05). SV range became significantly wider for both deep breathing and the Valsalva maneuver, compared with the values observed during normal breathing (P ⬍ .05). During the Valsalva maneuver, mean SV was significantly decreased (P ⬍ .05); the acceleration-deceleration ratio was clearly increased as a result of the sudden increase and slow decrease of SV (P ⬍ .05). Deep Volume 229 䡠 Number 2 breathing does not differ from normal breathing in regard to mean SV and the acceleration-deceleration ratio (P ⬎ .05). When we compared values observed during normal breathing in healthy subjects with those observed during spontaneous breathing in patients with severe COPD, all SV parameters differed significantly between both groups (P ⬍ .05), as demonstrated in Table 2. Cardiac performance in patients with COPD was significantly decreased in regard to minimal, maximal, and mean SV (P ⬍ .05), as is displayed in Figure 5. Acceleration-deceleration ratio and SV range were increased, as may be observed with com- Conventional MR imaging flow acquisition measures only the average of all SVs during many respiratory cycles. This technique cannot reveal the instant SV changes that occur as a result of the continuously changing intrathoracic pressures caused by breathing. With real-time MR imaging flow acquisition, it is possible to assess the direct influence of breathing on aortic flow. During inspiration, there is an instantaneous decrease of left ventricular SV, followed by an increase during the consecutive expiration. These measured SV changes confirm results of previous echocardiographic studies and computer model studies about ventricular interdependence (6,7). These results indicated that in end-inspiration the negative intrathoracic pressure results in a lower SV than in end-expiration, when intrathoracic pressure equals atmospheric pressure. Relationship between Cardiac Flow and Different Breathing Maneuvers With real-time MR imaging, it was possible to demonstrate that breathing maneuvers have a distinct influence on cardiac SV. The present results indicate that Real-Time MR Imaging of Aortic Flow 䡠 517 Radiology minimal and maximal SV show a significant change when deep breathing or the Valsalva maneuver are performed as compared with the values measured during normal breathing. It is hypothesized that more extreme intrathoracic pressures during special maneuvers cause the changes in these SV parameters (7). In healthy subjects, the ratio of SV acceleration divided by SV deceleration equals 1 during normal and deep breathing. When there is expiratory airway obstruction, such as during the Valsalva maneuver or during spontaneous breathing in patients with COPD, this ratio increases because of the prolongation of the period in which SV decreases. The Valsalva maneuver implies an extremely obstructed expiratory phase and might therefore be a model for spontaneous breathing in COPD (13). SV increases rapidly at the beginning of the Valsalva maneuver and decreases slowly while there is still a higher (expiratory) intrathoracic pressure. This is in agreement with the findings in the study of Eichenberger et al (11), who used real-time MR imaging to assess the aortic blood flow during a few seconds of normal breathing and during the Valsalva maneuver in healthy subjects. They found a SV decrease of 25% at the end of the maneuver, as compared with the average SV during normal breathing. The present results show an SV decrease of almost 50%. Figure 6. Graph shows comparison of all SV parameters as a result of normal breathing in both healthy subjects and patients with COPD. COPD causes a decrease of minimal, maximal, and mean SV (P ⬍ .05). Note the increase in SV range and acceleration-deceleration ratio in patients with COPD as compared with values in healthy subjects (P ⬍ .05). ⴱ ⫽ P ⬍ .05, unpaired two-tailed Student t test, comparison between healthy subjects and patients with COPD. jects. This suggests that after the normal increase at the start of expiration, SV slowly starts to decrease during the last phase of expiration, and the decrease in SV continues during inspiration. All these differences in SV parameters in patients with COPD are comparable with the differences that occur during the Valsalva maneuver when compared with nonobstructed breathing, and these findings support the hypothesis that the Valsalva maneuver can be used as a model for breathing in patients with COPD (13). Patients with COPD Clinical Implications The results show that the patients with COPD have a decreased minimal, maximal, and mean left ventricular SV as compared with subjects who have normal unobstructed breathing. Heart rate did not differ between both groups. The diminished SV in patients with COPD indicates impaired cardiac function caused by the pathologically altered pressure relationships between the intra- and extrathoracic compartments as a result of the obstructed breathing pattern (5). Hypoxemia induced by both parenchymal and vascular pulmonary damage can also add to the impaired cardiac function (4). The SV range, that is, the difference between minimal and maximal SV, is wider when compared with that during normal breathing in healthy subjects. This is probably because of the increased gap between the higher end-expiratory intrathoracic pressure and the normal unobstructed inspiratory thoracic pressure. The acceleration-deceleration ratio of the SV curve is significantly higher in patients with COPD who are breathing spontaneously than it is in healthy sub- We believe that in the future this technique can be useful in the monitoring of cardiac SV noninvasively to evaluate the effect of pulmonary medication (ie, bronchodilators) and oxygen therapy. It might also be useful in the evaluation of the hemodynamic effect of breathing retraining that is part of a pulmonary rehabilitation program (14,15). Moderate pulmonary hypertension is frequently encountered in patients with severe COPD and results in elevated right ventricular pressures. This, in turn, may contribute to the paradoxical movement of the intraventricular septum, with an adverse effect on left ventricular SV, cardiac output, and cardiac index. The effect of medical therapy aimed at the reduction of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular pressures may be evaluated by the proposed MR imaging protocol as well. The MR imaging protocol in this study may be useful to provide highly accurate and reproducible measurements noninvasively to monitor cardiopulmonary hemodynamics. 518 䡠 Radiology 䡠 November 2003 Limitations Intrathoracic pressures were measured indirectly with a respiratory belt balloon. Body surface area and heart rate were equal between both groups (ie, healthy subjects and patients with COPD), although mean age was different. However, findings of some studies (16,17) indicate that SV remains constant over time or even increases with age in healthy individuals. In conclusion, in contrast to conventional velocity-encoded MR imaging, real-time MR flow imaging can demonstrate a decrease in left ventricular SV during inspiration and an increase in SV during expiration. In addition, instantaneous effects of changes in breathing on SV can be measured by using real-time MR flow imaging. In healthy volunteers, deep breathing caused an increase in the range of SV, whereas the mean SV and the slopes of the SV curve remained unchanged, as compared with these parameters during normal breathing. The Valsalva maneuver exaggerated the observed difference in SV range caused by deep breathing in normal subjects. The SV curve of the Valsalva maneuver became strongly asymmetrical because of a prolongation of the SV decrease, as compared with those observed during normal and deep breathing. In patients with COPD—that is, in patients with an expiratory obstruction— the observed increase in SV range was similar to that during deep breathing and the Valsalva maneuver, as observed in healthy subjects. Moreover, the SV minimum, SV maximum, and mean SV were at a lower level, as compared with those van den Hout et al Radiology in healthy subjects. An interesting observation was that the SV curve in COPD patients became asymmetrical with a fast SV increase and a slow decrease that reflected expiratory obstruction, as observed during the Valsalva maneuver in healthy subjects. MR imaging evaluation of hemodynamics may become useful for monitoring of the effect of therapy in patients with COPD or pulmonary hypertension. The technique also will be useful to study the pathophysiology of COPD and other diseases with heart-lung interaction. Acknowledgments: We acknowledge the important contributions of Erik van den Berg, BS, and Zafiria Metafratzi, MD, in the analysis of the data and in the assistance they provided during the imaging procedures. Rik van den Hout passed away after a long illness on April 23, 2003. His coauthors dedicate this article to his memory. References 1. Vizza CD, Lynch JP, Ochoa LL, Richardson G, Trulock EP. Right and left ventricular dysfunction in patients with severe pulmonary disease. Chest 1998; 113:576 – 583. 2. Tyberg JV, Grant DA, Kingma I, et al. Effects of positive intrathoracic pressure on Volume 229 䡠 Number 2 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics. Respir Physiol 2000; 119:171–179. Buda AJ, Pinsky MR, Ingels NB Jr, et al. Effect of intrathoracic pressure on left ventricular performance. N Engl J Med 1979; 301:453– 459. Matthay RA, Niederman MS, Wiedemann HP. Cardiovascular-pulmonary interaction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with special reference to the pathogenesis and management of cor pulmonale. Med Clin North Am 1990; 74:571– 618. Scharf SM. Cardiovascular effects of airways obstruction. Lung 1991; 169:1–23. Amoore JN, Santamore WP. Model studies of the contribution of ventricular interdependence to the transient changes in ventricular function with respiratory efforts. Cardiovasc Res 1989; 23:683– 694. Guz A, Innes JA, Murphy K. Respiratory modulation of left ventricular stroke volume in man measured using pulsed Doppler ultrasound. J Physiol Lond 1987; 393:499 –512. Karam M, Wise RA, Natarajan TK, Permutt S, Wagner HN. Mechanism of decreased left ventricular stroke volume during inspiration in man. Circulation 1984; 69:866 – 873. Michard F, Chemla D, Richard C, et al. Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159:935–939. Boussuges A, Pinet C, Molenat F, et al. Left atrial and ventricular filling in 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an echocardiographic and Doppler study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 670 – 675. Eichenberger AC, Schwitter J, McKinnon GC, Debatin JF, von Schulthess GK. Phase-contrast echo-planar MR imaging: real-time quantification of flow and velocity patterns in the thoracic vessels induced by Valsalva’s maneuver. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5:648 – 655. Lualdi JC, Goldhaber SZ. Right ventricular dysfunction after acute pulmonary embolism: pathophysiologic factors, detection, and therapeutic implications. Am Heart J 1995; 130:1276 –1282. Markelov IM, Karashurov ES, Martianov SG. Role of intrathoracic pressure in changes in the greater and lesser circulation hemodynamics in patients with bronchial asthma. Sov Med 1990; 10 –14. Aliverti A, Macklem PT. How and why exercise is impaired in COPD. Respiration 2001; 68:229 –239. Guell R, Casan P, Belda J, et al. Long-term effects of outpatient rehabilitation of COPD: a randomized trial. Chest 2000; 117:976 –983. Slotwiner DJ, Devereux RB, Schwartz JE, et al. Relation of age to left ventricular function in clinically normal adults. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82:621– 626. Wandt B, Bojo L, Hatle L, Wranne B. Left ventricular contraction pattern changes with age in normal adults. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998; 11:857– 863. Real-Time MR Imaging of Aortic Flow 䡠 519