Download Fire regime shifts affect bird species distributions

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
1
Fire regime shifts affect bird species distributions
2
3
4
April Reside, Jeremy VanDerWal, Alex Kutt, Ian Watson and Stephen Williams
(A) Abstract
5
(B) Aim: Fire is a major driver of ecosystem structure and process, and shifts in fire regimes are
6
implicated in the decline of many species. Shifting fire regimes have been documented around the
7
world, and fire frequency and extent is predicted to increase in many areas due to changes in both
8
climate and land management. Here we address the need for greater understanding of species’
9
sensitivity to fire frequency, and the effect of increasing fire frequency on species distributions.
10
(B) Location: The tropical savannas of northern Australia.
11
(B) Methods: We developed distribution models for bird species using the modelling algorithm
12
Maxent. We included climate, fire frequency and the subset variable fire frequency late in the dry
13
season as environmental variables in the models. We investigated the effect of increasing fire
14
frequency, and increasing fire late in the dry season, on species distributions by projecting species
15
model algorithms onto scenarios of incrementally increased fire frequency.
16
(B) Results: The probability of presence for most species was higher when fire frequency late in the
17
dry season was low. Species showed a mixed response to an overall increase in fire frequency, with
18
one-third predicted to increase in distribution. However almost all species (98%) showed a decrease
19
in predicted range with increased late-dry season fire, and species distribution area was generally
20
negatively correlated with an increase in late-dry season fire.
21
(B) Main Conclusion: Our study highlighted the array of responses of species to increasing fire
22
frequency, and suggested that increased fire frequency late in the dry season is detrimental to most
23
savanna-restricted bird species. The understanding of individual species’ preferences for particular
24
fire frequencies is important for informed conservation planning.
25
(C) Keywords: Australian tropical savannas, birds, fire frequency, late-dry season fire, Maxent,
26
species distribution models
27
28
(A) Introduction
29
Shifting fire regimes are a critical conservation issue in many regions of the world, compounding the
30
pressures of climate change, intensifying land use and invasive species on biodiversity (Keith,
31
Williams et al. 2002; Stephens and Ruth 2005; Brook 2008). The frequency and extent of fire has
32
increased in many regions (Mouillot and Field 2005), and further increases are predicted in areas such
33
as the USA, Brazil, central Asia, south-eastern Europe, southern Africa and Australia (Liu, Stanturf et
34
al. 2010). Managing fire for optimal biodiversity outcomes is an essential conservation issue; however
35
our current understanding of the timing, frequency and scale of fire regimes that species require is
36
limited (Clarke 2008). Information on species’ sensitivity to fire, and the impact of increased fire
37
frequency on species, is therefore crucial to their conservation.
38
39
Observations suggest that fire patterns around the world are already shifting in response to changing
40
climate (Westerling, Hidalgo et al. 2006). Increasing wildfire activity in the western United States
41
has been associated with warmer springs, extended summer dry seasons and drier vegetation
42
(Westerling, Hidalgo et al. 2006). Increases in fire activity in Canada (Gillett, Weaver et al. 2004)
43
and the Neotropics (Barlow and Peres 2004) have also been attributed to climatic changes. Future fire
44
activity is predicted to vary considerably across regions in response to climate change, and land
45
management will continue to influence the extent of these changes (Liu, Stanturf et al. 2010).
46
Australia, already the world’s most fire-prone continent, is also predicted to face an overall increase in
47
fire (Beer and Williams 1995; Cary and Banks 2000; Williams, Karoly et al. 2001; Cary 2002;
48
Pitman, Narisma et al. 2007; Krawchuk, Moritz et al. 2009), though the spatial and temporal
49
realisation of fire increase across the landscape is uncertain.
50
51
Fire occurs in almost every biome, but since 1990 86% of fires globally occurred in tropical savannas
52
and grasslands (Mouillot and Field 2005). For tropical savannas worldwide, fire is a significant
53
determinant of landscape and biodiversity pattern (Davis, Peterson et al. 2000; Garnett and Brook
54
2007), and fire is essential for maintenance of these landscapes (Bond and Parr 2010). Fires shape
55
savanna vegetation (Woinarski, Risler et al. 2004), and fauna that inhabit these tropical savannas are
56
largely resilient to fire (Bond and Parr 2010).
57
58
Both the frequency and the seasonality of fire in savannas have important implications for
59
biodiversity (Garnett and Brook 2007; Woinarski, Armstrong et al. 2010). Frequent fires lead to
60
reduced tree density (Davis, Peterson et al. 2000) and decreased vegetation structural complexity
61
(Bowman 1998). Too-frequent fires are particularly detrimental to species favouring long-unburnt
62
patches, such as some mammals (Friend and Taylor 1985; Andersen, Cook et al. 2005), fire sensitive
63
plants (Bowman and Panton 1993), granivorous birds (Fitzherbert and Baker-Gabb 1988) and birds
64
requiring grassy refugia (Garnett and Bredl 1985; Rowley and Russell 1993; Jansen, Little et al.
65
1999). However where fires are sufficiently infrequent, the tree-grass ratio within the savanna could
66
increase (Roques, O'Connor et al. 2001) which can lead to lower bird diversity (O'Reilly, Ogada et al.
67
2006) and if excluded for long enough, a shifting of biomes from savanna to rainforest (Woinarski,
68
Risler et al. 2004; Accatino, De Michele et al. 2010).
69
70
Fire seasonality can be a major factor determining the impact of fire on biodiversity due to the
71
influence of season on the amount of fuel available to burn and the presence of weather conducive to
72
burning (Bradstock 2010). In tropical savannas, early dry-season fires tend to be of low intensity, and
73
their occurrence reduces the amount of herbaceous biomass available to burn later in the dry season.
74
In the absence of early-dry season fire, fuel build-up can lead to late-dry season fires that have greater
75
intensity and the capacity to burn larger areas (Williams, Griffiths et al. 2002). The late-dry season
76
fires remove unburnt patches from the landscape (Bird, Bird et al. 2008), homogenising the age-class
77
structure of large tracts of savanna (Bradstock, Bedward et al. 2005).
78
79
Understanding the influence of fire frequency and seasonality on savanna biodiversity is a primary
80
conservation objective in tropical savannas (Williams, Griffiths et al. 2002; Uys, Bond et al. 2004). In
81
Australia, shifts away from traditional indigenous land management have seen an end to small scale
82
early-dry season fires towards extensive, high intensity late-dry season fires. The increase in late-dry
83
season burning is thought to be a main cause of declines in many vertebrate species populations in the
84
tropical savannas of northern Australia (Franklin 1999; Woinarski, Brock et al. 1999; Woinarski,
85
Milne et al. 2001). Experimental and localised studies on fire frequency and fire seasonality and
86
biodiversity in this system have elucidated species responses to fire events and regimes (Andersen,
87
Cook et al. 2005; Kutt and Woinarski 2007; Murphy, Legge et al. 2010). However, species-level
88
studies and natural experiments should also be complemented by simulation models to investigate
89
landscape scale fire patterns and its effect on biodiversity (Driscoll, Lindenmayer et al. 2010). In this
90
study we focus on Australian tropical savanna birds to investigate 1) species sensitivity to fire
91
frequency across their range, and 2) the effect of increased fire frequency and in particular increased
92
late-dry season fire frequency (herein “late-fire frequency”) on bird species distributions. To address
93
the first objective we examine species occurrences in relation to fire frequency and late-fire
94
frequency, and then estimate the probability of presence for each species according to fire frequency
95
and late-fire frequency. For the second objective, distribution models for Australian tropical savanna
96
birds built using current conditions of fire and climate were projected onto spatial surfaces of
97
simulated fire frequency increases. Understanding species sensitivities to fire frequency, and how
98
their distributions will be affected with fire frequency increases (a likely scenario under climate
99
change predictions (Krawchuk, Moritz et al. 2009)) is an important step in developing the mitigation
100
strategies for bird species conservation (Driscoll, Lindenmayer et al. 2010).
101
102
(A) Methods
103
(B) Study Area
104
Tropical savannas stretch almost continuously across Australia north of c. 23oS (Franklin, Whitehead
105
et al. 2005), occupying nearly one quarter of the Australian continent (Williams, Carter et al. 2005).
106
Savannas are characterised by a discontinuous stratum of trees above a mostly continuous layer of
107
grasses (Williams, Griffiths et al. 2002). Rainfall in the Australian tropical savannas is highly
108
seasonal, with most rain falling in the wet season between December and March (Felderhof and
109
Gillieson 2006). There is a climatic gradient across the Australian savannas, with a trend of
110
decreasing rainfall and increasing inter-annual rainfall variability with distance from coast (Mott,
111
Williams et al. 1985).
112
113
(B) Bird Data
114
We focussed our study on 44 bird species that are largely restricted to the northern tropical savanna
115
woodlands (see Appendix S1 in Supporting Information for full list of species), excluding waterbirds
116
and rainforest species that may occur intermittently in savanna regions, and species with ranges that
117
extend substantially into other biogeographic regions. We only included species with distributions
118
almost entirely in the study area as less confidence can be placed in models that are restricted to a
119
small subset of species’ ranges (Elith and Leathwick 2009). Despite this caveat, we undertook
120
preliminary investigations for a further 163 species that occur within the savanna but also in other
121
parts of the Australian continent to see if the pattern of responses found for the core 44 species are
122
reflected in a larger sample of species occurring in the region. However, the analysis focuses on the
123
44 species which are more restricted to the savanna. Occurrence records of all 207 bird species were
124
collated from the Birds Australia Atlas (Blakers, Davies et al. 1984; Barrett, Silcocks et al. 2003), the
125
Queensland Governmental atlas WildNet (Environmental Protection Agency 2004) and CSIRO
126
(protocol as in (Reside, VanDerWal et al. 2010)) for the period from 1997 to 2008.
127
128
(B) Environmental Data
129
The climate data used for modelling included gridded spatial layers of annual mean temperature,
130
temperature seasonality (the mean coefficient of variation of temperature over an annual period),
131
annual precipitation, maximum temperature of the warmest period, annual precipitation, precipitation
132
seasonality and precipitation of the driest quarter, estimated using Anuclim 5.1 software (McMahon,
133
Hutchinson et al. 1995) and a ~250 m resolution DEM (GEODATA 9 Second DEM Version 2;
134
Geoscience Australia). The fire data included maps of fire frequency, number of years land was burnt
135
in the period from 1997 to 2008; and late-fire frequency (a subset of fire frequency), the number of
136
years an area was burnt late in the dry season between 1997 and 2008 (Northern Australia Fire
137
Information, NAFI http://138.80.128.152/nafi2/). The late dry-season is defined as the period
138
between August and November (Felderhof and Gillieson 2006). The fire layers were derived from the
139
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer
140
(NOAA-AVHRR) and other images from the Bushfire Council of the Northern Territory.
141
142
(B) Environmental Space Plots
143
Environmental space plots were produced to visually inspect the species’ occurrence against fire
144
frequency, regardless of geographic space using the statistical package “R” version 2.9.0 (www.r-
145
project.org). Annual rainfall, fire frequency and late-fire frequency variables for every 1o pixel of the
146
study area were extracted, and then plotted with rainfall on the x-axis and either fire frequency or late
147
fire frequency on the y-axis. This provided the “background” available environmental space. The
148
values of annual rainfall and fire frequency or late-fire frequency corresponding to each species’
149
location were plotted on top of the background. This gave an indication of the selectivity of the
150
species, whether a species was selecting areas with particular fire frequencies, particular annual mean
151
rainfall values, or both. Both the background environmental space and the species’ occurrence were
152
weighted to frequency of occurrence, so that more frequently recorded combinations of fire and
153
rainfall are represented by different colours than those less frequently recorded.
154
155
(B) Distribution Models
156
Species distribution models were run using the presence-only modelling program Maxent (Phillips,
157
Anderson et al. 2006). Maxent uses species presence records to statistically relate species occurrence
158
to environmental variables on the principle of maximum entropy. All default settings were used, and
159
models were run at a spatial resolution of 0.05 degrees (c. 5 x 5 km). Model performance (defined as
160
the models’ consistency and ability to identify species actual presence and actual absence (Ling,
161
Huang et al. 2003)) was evaluated by the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC): an AUC
162
score of 1 is a perfect fit of the data, 0.5 is no better than random (Elith, H. Graham et al. 2006;
163
Phillips, Anderson et al. 2006). Models for each species were screened for low AUC (<0.75) so that
164
underperforming models were not included in further analyses.
165
166
The percentage contribution of each environmental variable to the model was used to determine their
167
proportional influence. The Maxent output response curves were then used to further examine the
168
influence of the fire variables on the model. The response curves show the logistic probability of
169
presence using only one variable at a time so that the contribution of individual variables can be
170
examined when there is autocorrelation in the environmental layers. This was important in this case,
171
as the late-fire frequency variable is a subset of fire frequency and therefore is highly correlated.
172
173
(B) Increased Fire and Late-Fire Frequency Projections
174
The impact of increasing fire frequency and late-fire frequency was predicted by projecting the model
175
algorithm for each species onto a series of spatial surfaces, each consisting of a fire layer with
176
artificially increased fire or late-fire frequency, and all climate variables remaining unchanged. These
177
spatial surfaces were created by increasing each cell of the fire frequency raster layer by an increment
178
of one (therefore a cell that was burnt five times between 1997 and 2008 then had a fire frequency of
179
six). This process was repeated six times for both fire frequency and late-fire frequency. A total of
180
thirteen spatial surfaces were generated: the first with current levels of fire frequency, late-fire
181
frequency and climate, then six surfaces with increasing fire frequency, and six with increasing late-
182
fire frequency.
183
184
The Maxent default cumulative output value was converted to a binary presence/absence for each
185
species using the threshold that balances training omission rate, predicted area and logistic threshold
186
value (Liu, Berry et al. 2005). This threshold value provides realistic predictions of species
187
distributions (Prates-Clark, Saatchi et al. 2008; Vanderwal, Shoo et al. 2009). With the binary output,
188
area could be denoted as “suitable predicted area” or “unsuitable predicted area” for each species.
189
This enabled the calculation of the proportion of the whole study area that was suitable. We could
190
then predict the percentage of the study area (Australian tropical savannas) that was suitable under the
191
current conditions, and how this proportional suitability shifted when fire frequency or late-fire
192
frequency increased incrementally six times. The change in suitable area under the extreme case of a
193
six-increment increase in fire frequency or late-fire frequency was calculated by subtracting the
194
percentage suitable under the current conditions from that calculated for a six-increment increase.
195
196
In addition to the change between current and the extreme case, we examined the change in
197
percentage suitable area for each species with each increment of increasing fire frequency and late-
198
fire frequency. We calculated the Pearson correlation between increasing fire and increasing late-fire
199
frequency from current to a maximum increase of six years burnt, with the percentage of suitable area
200
predicted by the model for each species. The Pearson correlations (ρ) for all species are displayed in a
201
histogram. All analyses were conducted using the statistical package “R” version 2.9.0 (www.r-
202
project.org). Images of the suitable area, unsuitable area, and area that changed in suitability
203
depending on fire frequency as predicted by the Maxent model were produced for each species. Four
204
exemplar species with a range of fire sensitivities are presented as case studies to demonstrate the
205
results.
206
207
(A) Results
208
(B) Environmental Space Plots
209
Birds in Australian tropical savannas show a broad range of responses to existing fire frequencies
210
(Fig. 1). The environmental space plots (Fig. 1a c, e, g) show that species were recorded in a smaller
211
fire frequency envelope than the entire range of fire frequencies. The highest concentration of
212
species’ occurrence points generally clustered around the lower fire frequencies. Some species, for
213
example Gouldian finch Erythrura gouldiae, were found fairly broadly across fire frequencies (zero to
214
ten years out of twelve burnt) but were not found in areas with late-fire frequency greater than six
215
years out of twelve (Fig. 1a). In contrast, red-backed fairy-wren Malurus melanocephalus (Fig. 1c)
216
showed broad tolerance for fire, being recorded at every fire frequency and most frequencies of late-
217
dry season fire. A few species were less tolerant, such as the white-streaked honeyeater Trichodere
218
cockerelli (Fig.1g) which was recorded almost exclusively in locations with fire frequencies less than
219
five years out of 12.
220
221
(B) Probability of Presence Curves
222
The logistic probability of species presence depending on the fire frequency calculated by Maxent is
223
shown in Fig. 1(b), (d), (f) and (h). Gouldian finch (Fig. 1b) and red-backed fairy-wren (Fig. 1d)
224
showed slight increases in the probability of presence as fire frequency increases, but decreasing in
225
probability of presence as late-fire frequency increases. In contrast, star finch Neochmia ruficauda
226
(Fig. 1f), and white-streaked honeyeater (Fig. 1h) both show decreases in probability of presence with
227
increases in both fire frequency and late-fire frequency. White-streaked honeyeater is predicted to not
228
occur where fire frequency or late-fire frequency exceed eight or seven years respectively. The
229
response curves are generally consistent the environmental space plots. For example, Gouldian finch
230
is frequently recorded at fire frequencies between two and nine (Fig. 1a). The Maxent probability of
231
presence peaks between fire frequencies of seven and ten (Fig. 1b). Gouldian finch is recorded only
232
where late-fire frequency is between zero and six, and the probability of presence decreases after late-
233
fire frequency exceeds three. On the other hand, red-back fairy-wren (Fig. 2c) is recorded at every
234
fire frequency, and correspondingly, fire frequency has little effect on their probability of presence.
235
236
(B) Distribution Models
237
Model performance across the core 44 savanna bird species was high, with all species’ model AUC
238
scores above 0.75 (range 0.76 – 0.99). The environmental factors of fire frequency and late-fire
239
frequency had a small but meaningful mean contribution in the models: 3.9% (range 0.6 – 23.1%) and
240
3.1% (range 0.04 – 11.9%) respectively (Table 1). Climate provided most of the explanatory power
241
to the distribution models, which is to be expected for models at this scale (Pearson and Dawson
242
2003). Annual precipitation showed the highest average contribution (37.8%), followed by
243
temperature seasonality (24.3%).
244
245
(B) Increased Fire and Late-Fire Frequency Projections
246
Predicted changes in the percentage area suitable for the core 44 species under a six-increment
247
increase in fire frequency and late-fire frequency are shown in Table 2. Two-thirds of these species
248
faced a decrease in suitable area with increased fire frequency, and the mean change in area was
249
slightly greater for the species with decreased ranges (9.4% of suitable area lost, versus 4.4%) than the
250
species that increased in predicted range. Many more species showed a decrease in suitable area with
251
increased fire in the late dry season, with 98% of species showing decreased suitable area. The mean
252
change in suitable area was also more dramatic for the species facing a decrease in suitable area, at
253
7.2% of area lost versus 0.8% of area gained for the one species (long-tailed finch
254
Poephila acuticauda) that showed increases in suitable area.
255
256
The effect of increasing fire frequency and late-fire frequency at each of the increments is shown in
257
detail for the four exemplar species (Fig. 2). Species showed a variety of responses to increased fire
258
frequency. Gouldian finch showed a slight increase with increasing fire frequency (Fig. 2a). Red-
259
backed fairy-wren showed little change (Fig. 2c), whereas star finch (Fig. 2e) and white-streaked
260
honeyeater (Fig. 2g) decreased. All four species showed a trend of decreasing suitable area associated
261
with an increase in late-fire frequency. Star finch showed a particularly strong decline with late-fire
262
frequency (Fig. 2f). White-streaked honeyeater showed strong declines with both increasing fire and
263
late-fire frequencies (Fig. 2g and 2h).
264
265
The relationship between increasing fire frequency or late fire frequency and the percentage suitable
266
area across the 44 species is shown with Pearson correlations (ρ) in Fig. 3(a). Two-thirds of species
267
were negatively correlated between increased fire frequency and the percentage suitable area, and
268
one-third positively correlated. In contrast, the majority of species show a strong negative correlation
269
between increasing late-fire frequency and the percentage suitable habitat. The ρ are also shown for
270
all 207 of species that also occur in Australian tropical savannas (Fig. 3b). The same pattern is shown
271
across the 207 species as that seen for the core 44 savanna specialist species – a mixed response to
272
increasing fire frequency. However, under increasing late-fire frequency most species show a strong
273
decline in suitable area.
274
275
Some species may face substantial distribution loss with increases in fire frequency. In the extreme
276
event of a six-increment increase in fire frequency, 11 species are predicted to lose more than 10% of
277
their range within the tropical savannas (Appendix S1). These same 11 species are also predicted to
278
lose more than 10% of their range within the study area in the case of a six-increment increase in late
279
fire frequency. Under both scenarios, three species are predicted to lose more than 20% of their
280
distribution: yellow honeyeater Lichenostomus flavus, black-throated finch Poephila cincta and
281
oriental cuckoo Cuculus saturatus. A six-increment increase in fire frequency may prove beneficial
282
for some species, although predicted increases in suitable area are comparably small. Thirteen species
283
showed very slight increases, with the most substantial increase shown by long-tailed finch Poephila
284
acuticuada, with an increase of 10%. Long-tailed finch was the only species to show an increase in
285
area due to a six-increment increase in late fire frequency; however this increase was minimal (Table
286
1).
287
288
(A) Discussion
289
290
This study suggests that on broad bioclimatic scale Australian tropical savanna birds have a low
291
sensitivity to fire frequency and fire frequency increase, though this sensitivity increases with
292
increased late frequency fires. All methods employed within this study: the environmental space
293
plots, the probability of presence curves and the simulations of increased fire frequency; all show that
294
most savanna bird species are tolerant of all but the highest fire frequencies. In fact, one-third of the
295
44 savanna bird species examined in our study showed a positive correlation between suitable habitat
296
area and fire frequency increase if the increases were not confined to the late-dry season. Many
297
species within Australian tropical savannas are known for their resilience to fire, and this is likely due
298
to the long history of coexisting with fire (Andersen and Hoffman 2010). Birds within this biome
299
have high mobility, a key attribute in resilience to fire (Moretti and Legg 2009). Early-dry season
300
burns in particular may have a beneficial effect on particular species. Many species are attracted to
301
recently burnt areas as fire may make food resources, such as seeds and small animals, more
302
accessible due to removal of the grass layer (Braithwaite and Estbergs 1985; Braithwaite and Estbergs
303
1987; Dean 1987; Woinarski 1990). However the main benefit of early-dry season burns may be that
304
they reduce the extent and impact of late-dry season fires (Williams, Griffiths et al. 2002; Bird, Bird
305
et al. 2008). Studies have shown that the proximity to unburnt area is important for species to survive
306
the actual fire event (Murphy, Legge et al. 2010). In addition, fire may facilitate access to foraging
307
resources, but be detrimental to nesting sites (Woinarski 1990), and species benefit most with access
308
to both burnt and unburnt areas within their home range (Murphy, Legge et al. 2010). Wet season
309
burns are also likely to be beneficial. They have higher bird abundance than unburnt sites immediately
310
post-fire, and maintain similar vegetation structure and bird assemblages as unburnt sites several years
311
following the burning event (Valentine, Schwarzkopf et al. 2007). Of the species predicted to
312
experience increases in suitable range due to increases in fire frequency in our study, some are
313
associated with vegetation close to water such as long-tailed finch, purple-crowned fairy-wren
314
Malurus coronatus, Gouldian finch, northern rosella Platycercus venustus, silver-crowned friarbird
315
Philemon corniculatus and crimson finch Neochmia phaeton. These species may be more resilient to
316
frequent fires due to their proximity to water courses. Previous studies have found that black-tailed
317
treecreeper in particular has been associated with frequent burning (Woinarski, Brock et al. 1999).
318
Species responses to fire predicted by our study appeared to be independent of functional groups, as
319
granivorous, insectivorous and foliage insectivore/nectarivore species showed both positive and
320
negative relationships with increasing fire frequency in our study.
321
322
Our study demonstrated that despite the resilience of many species in tropical savannas to regular fire,
323
increasing late-dry season fire has a detrimental effect on the majority of species. These findings are
324
consistent with other studies which highlight the impact of late-dry season fire on bird species in the
325
tropical savannas (Bradstock, Bedward et al. 2005). High late-fire frequency can influence bird
326
composition and assemblage pattern by changing habitat structure through the decline in fire sensitive
327
vegetation (Bowman, Wilson et al. 1988; Russell-Smith and Bowman 1992; Price and Bowman
328
1994), increasing tree mortality (Williams, Griffiths et al. 2002), and a reduction in structural
329
diversity (Woinarski 1990; Valentine, Schwarzkopf et al. 2007). Other studies have shown late-dry
330
season fires to be detrimental to tropical savanna bird species such as black-tailed treecreeper,
331
Climacteris melanura (Garnett and Crowley 1995), red-backed fairy-wren (Murphy, Legge et al.
332
2010), lemon-bellied flycatcher Microeca griseoceps and Australian owlet-nightjar Aegotheles
333
cristatus (Andersen, Cook et al. 2005).
334
335
Fire frequency and late-fire frequency had a relatively small proportional contribution to the
336
distribution of most species, as was expected as species distributions are predominantly governed by
337
climate at large spatial scales (Pearson and Dawson 2003). For some species, fire frequency
338
contributed substantially to the model (e.g. >20% for the northern rosella), though percentage
339
contributions for individual variables can be misleading when variables are highly correlated, as with
340
fire frequency and late-fire frequency, or mean annual temperature and maximum temperature of the
341
warmest period. Despite the relatively small contribution of the fire variables, simulating changes in
342
fire frequency resulted in substantial changes in the distribution models for many species. Thorough
343
understanding of the effects of fire frequency and seasonality on individual species will require
344
detailed mechanistic studies (Driscoll, Lindenmayer et al. 2010); these would determine the
345
importance of interactions of local factors e.g. burnt patch size, proximity to unburnt refugia or habitat
346
heterogeneity to species resilience to fire (Murphy, Legge et al. 2010).
347
348
For many species likely to lose suitable habitat as fire frequency and late fire frequency increases,
349
decreases mostly occurred in the south parts of their distribution. The southern section of the tropical
350
savannas is largely semi-arid, with generally a much lower fire frequency than in the north (Felderhof
351
and Gillieson 2006). Fire can have a severe impact on these habitats, as lower and less consistent
352
rainfall can slow the post-fire regeneration process (Noble 1989). Many semi-arid plant species are
353
fire-killed, such as acacia (e.g. Acacia aneura), and spinifex (e.g. Triodia spp), and high fire
354
frequency coupled with the lack of post-fire rain can prevent resprouting (Allan and Southgate 2002).
355
This severe impact of fire on the vegetation in the semi-arid savannas could explain the lack of
356
resilience of bird species to high fire frequencies on the southern edge of the savannas, as birds are
357
highly responsive to vegetation structure (Martin and Possingham 2005; Sirami, Seymour et al. 2009).
358
It could also explain why our study found detrimental effects of late fire on some species, for example
359
blue-winged kookaburra (Dacelo leachii) and forest kingfisher (Todiramphus macleayii), while in the
360
northern mesic savannas of the Northern Territory experimental studies have found no effect of fire
361
on these species: in the mesic savannas the late fire effects are not as severe as in the southern, semi-
362
arid savanna.
363
364
While our study is likely to reflect real-world sensitivities of species to fire, it is not without
365
limitation. One issue is that the spatial scale – 5 km pixels – may miss the detail of fine burnt and
366
unburnt mosaics that are likely to be influential to bird species. However given the mobility of birds,
367
many species are operating on a spatial scale of hundreds of kilometres (Griffioen and Clarke 2002),
368
therefore although a 5 km x 5 km scale may be missing some detail, it is still fine enough to be
369
relevant to the species studied. Another limitation is the bird data and the fire data are from the same
370
period, therefore this study might not be capturing the lag-effect of past fire influences on habitat
371
structure and therefore the birds. However the broad patterns of fire frequencies across the savanna
372
have been consistent over the last 20 years (Russell-Smith 2002), therefore the fire history prior to our
373
study is likely to be broadly reflected in the vegetation patterns.
374
(A) Conclusion
375
376
Australian tropical savannas have “fire weather” conducive to burning for most of the dry season, but
377
burning is limited by the number of ignitions and fuel reduction by previous fires or intensive grazing
378
(Ash, McIvor et al. 1997; Bradstock 2010). Therefore a regime of moderate fire frequency early in
379
the dry season may be the best way to prevent the large destructive late-dry season fires (Williams,
380
Griffiths et al. 2002; Bird, Bird et al. 2008). Our study has shown that frequent fires late in the dry
381
season are likely to be detrimental to many bird species within savannas. In addition, we have
382
identified species that are particularly sensitive to high fire frequency, and those that benefit from
383
frequent fire when it occurs outside the late-dry season. Our study could therefore aid design of fire
384
regimes tailored to the management of species, particularly threatened or endemic species that are fire
385
sensitive (Garnett and Crowley 2002; Perry, Fisher et al. In Press). The relative congruence in
386
species’ sensitivities to the range of fire frequencies as demonstrated by our three modelling
387
approaches (environmental occurrence, their probability of presence, and change in suitable area
388
under hypothetical fire frequency increases) gives us confidence that our methods show meaningful
389
patterns. We suggest that this approach may be useful for identifying at risk species in other biomes
390
facing changes in fire regimes.
391
392
(A) References
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
Accatino, F., C. De Michele, et al. (2010). Tree-grass co-existence in savanna: Interactions of rain and
fire. Journal of Theoretical Biology 267, 235-242.
Allan, G. E. & R. I. Southgate (2002). Fire regimes in the spinifex landscapes of Australia.
Flammable Australia: The Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent. (ed. by R. A.
Bradstock, J. E. Williams and A. M. Gill), pp. 145-176. Cambridge University Press.
Andersen, A. & B. D. Hoffman (2010). Conservation value of low fire frequency in tropical savannas:
ants in monsoonal northern Australia. Austral Ecology.
Andersen, A. N., G. D. Cook, et al. (2005). Fire frequency and biodiversity conservation in Australian
tropical savannas: implications from the Kapalga fire experiment. Austral Ecology 30, 155167.
Ash, A. J., J. G. McIvor, et al. (1997). Building grass castles: integrating ecology and management of
Australia's tropical tall grass rangelands. Rangeland Journal 19, 123-144.
Barlow, J. & C. A. Peres (2004). Ecological responses to El Niño–induced surface fires in central
Brazilian Amazonia: management implications for flammable tropical forests. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 359, 367-380.
Barrett, G., A. Silcocks, et al. (2003). The New Atlas of Australian Birds, Melbourne, Royal
Australasian Ornithologists Union.
Beer, T. & A. L. Williams (1995). Estimating Australian forest fire danger under conditions of
doubled carbon dioxide concentrations. Climatic Change 29, 169-188.
Bird, R. B., D. W. Bird, et al. (2008). The fire stick farming hypothesis: Australian Aboriginal
foraging strategies, biodiversity, and anthropogenic fire mosaics. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, -.
Blakers, M., S. J. J. F. Davies, et al. (1984). The Atlas of Australian Birds, Melbourne University
Press: Melbourne.
Bond, W. J. & C. L. Parr (2010). Beyond the forest edge: Ecology, diversity and conservation of the
grassy biomes. Biological Conservation 143, 2395-2404.
Bowman, D. M. J. S. (1998). The impact of Aboriginal landscape burning on the Australian biota.
New Phytologist 140, 385-410.
Bowman, D. M. J. S. & W. J. Panton (1993). Decline of Callitris intratropica R. T. Baker & H. G.
Smith in the Northern Territory: Implications for pre- and post-European colonization fire
regimes. Journal of Biogeography 20, 373-381.
Bowman, D. M. J. S., B. A. Wilson, et al. (1988). Response of Eucalyptus forest and woodland to four
fire regimes at Munmarlary, Northern Territory, Australia. Journal of Ecology 76, 215-232.
Bradstock, R. A. (2010). A biogeographic model of fire regimes in Australia: current and future
implications. Global Ecology & Biogeography 19, 145-158.
Bradstock, R. A., M. Bedward, et al. (2005). Which mosaic? A landscape ecological approach for
evaluating interactions between fire regimes, habitat and animals. Wildlife Research 32, 409423.
Braithwaite, R. W. & J. Estbergs (1987). Fire-birds of the Top End. Australian Natural History 22,
299-302.
Braithwaite, R. W. & J. A. Estbergs (1985). Fire patterns and woody vegetation trends in the Alligator
Rivers region of northern Australia. Ecology and Management of the World's Savannas. (ed.
by J. C. Tothill and J. J. Mott). Australian Academy of Science, Canberra.
Brook, B. W. (2008). Synergies between climate change, extinctions and invasive vertebrates.
Wildlife Research 35, 249-252.
Cary, G. J. (2002). Importance of a changing climate for fire regimes in Australia. Flammable
Australia: The Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent. (ed. by R. A. Bradstock, J. E.
Williams and A. M. Gill). Cambridge University Press.
Cary, G. J. & J. C. Banks (2000). Fire regime sensitivity to global climate change: an Australian
perspective. Advances in Global Change Research: Biomass Burning and its Inter-
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
Relationships with the Climate System. (ed. by J. L. Innes, M. Beniston and M. M.
Verstraete), pp. 233-246. Springer Netherlands.
Clarke, M. F. (2008). Catering for the needs of fauna in fire management: science or just wishful
thinking? Wildlife Research 35, 385-394.
Davis, M. A., D. W. Peterson, et al. (2000). Restoring savanna using fire: impact on the breeding bird
community. Restoration Ecology 8, 30-40.
Dean, W. R. J. (1987). Birds associating with fire at Nylsvley Nature Reserve, Transvaal. Ostrich 58,
103-106.
Driscoll, D. A., D. B. Lindenmayer, et al. (2010). Fire management for biodiversity conservation: Key
research questions and our capacity to answer them. Biological Conservation 143, 1928-1939.
Elith, J., C. H. Graham, et al. (2006). Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from
occurrence data. Ecography 29, 129-151.
Elith, J. & J. R. Leathwick (2009). Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction
across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40, 677-697.
Environmental Protection Agency (2004). WildNet (Database). Environmental Protection Agency).
http://www.derm.qld.gov.au/wildlife-ecosystems/wildlife/wildlife_online/index.html,
Brisbane.
Felderhof, L. & D. Gillieson (2006). Comparison of fire patterns and fire frequency in two tropical
savanna bioregions. Austral Ecology 31, 736-746.
Fitzherbert, J. C. & D. J. Baker-Gabb (1988). Australasian grasslands and their avifauna. Ecology and
Conservation of Grassland Birds. (ed. by P. D. Goriup). International Council for Bird
Preservation, Cambridge.
Franklin, D., P. Whitehead, et al. (2005). Geographic patterns and correlates of the decline of
granivorous birds in northern Australia. Wildlife Research 32, 399-408.
Franklin, D. C. (1999). Evidence of disarray amongst granivorous bird assemblages in the savannas of
northern Australia, a region of sparse human settlement. Biological Conservation 90, 53-63.
Friend, G. R. & J. A. Taylor (1985). Habitat preferences of small mammals in tropical open-forest of
the Northern Territory. Australian Journal of Ecology 10, 173-185.
Garnett, S. & R. Bredl (1985). Birds in the vicinity of Edward River Settlement. Part II. Discussion,
references, list of passerines. The Sunbird 15, 25-40.
Garnett, S. & G. M. Crowley (1995). The decline of the Black Treecreeper Climacteris picumnus
melanota on Cape York Peninsula. Emu 95, 66-68.
Garnett, S. T. & B. W. Brook (2007). Modelling to forestall extinction of Australian tropical birds.
Journal of Ornithology 148, S311-S320.
Garnett, S. T. & G. M. Crowley (2002). Recovery Plan for the golden-shouldered parrot Psephotus
chrysopterygius 2003-2007. Report to Environment Australia). Queensland Parks and
Wildlife Service, Brisbane, Canberra.
Gillett, N. P., A. J. Weaver, et al. (2004). Detecting the effect of climate change on Canadian forest
fires. Geophysical Research Letters 31, L18211.
Griffioen, P. A. & M. F. Clarke (2002). Large-scale bird-movement patterns evident in eastern
Australian atlas data. Emu 102, 99-125.
Jansen, R., R. M. Little, et al. (1999). Implications of grazing and burning of grasslands on the
sustainable use of francolins (Francolinus spp.) and on overall bird conservation in the
highlands of Mpumalanga province, South Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 8, 587-602.
Keith, D. A., J. E. Williams, et al. (2002). Fire management and biodiveristy conservation: key
approaches and principles. Flammable Australia: The Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a
Continent. (ed. by R. A. Bradstock, J. E. Williams and A. M. Gill). Cambridge University
Press.
Krawchuk, M. A., M. A. Moritz, et al. (2009). Global pyrogeography: the current and future
distribution of wildfire. PLoS ONE 4, e5102.
Kutt, A. S. & J. C. Z. Woinarski (2007). The effects of grazing and fire on vegetation and the
vertebrate assemblage in a tropical savanna woodland in north-eastern Australia. Journal of
Tropical Ecology 23, 95-106.
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
Ling, C. X., J. Huang, et al. (2003). AUC: a better measure than accuracy in comparing learning
algorithms. Advances in Artificial Intelligence. (ed. by Y. Xiang and B. Chaib-draa).
Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Liu, C., P. M. Berry, et al. (2005). Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species
distributions. Ecography 28, 385-393.
Liu, Y., J. Stanturf, et al. (2010). Trends in global wildfire potential in a changing climate. Forest
Ecology and Management 259, 685-697.
Martin, T. G. & H. P. Possingham (2005). Predicting the impact of livestock grazing on birds using
foraging height data. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 400-408.
McMahon, J. P., M. F. Hutchinson, et al. (1995). ANUCLIM user's guide, Version 1). Centre for
Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian
Capital Territory, Australia.
Moretti, M. & C. Legg (2009). Combining plant and animal traits to assess community functional
responses to disturbance. Ecography 32, 299-309.
Mott, J. J., J. Williams, et al. (1985). Australian savanna ecosystems. Ecology and Management of the
World's Savannas. (ed. by J. C. Tothill and J. J. Mott). Australian Academy of Science,
Canberra.
Mouillot, F. & C. B. Field (2005). Fire history and the global carbon budget: a 1°× 1° fire history
reconstruction for the 20th century. Global Change Biology 11, 398-420.
Murphy, S. A., S. M. Legge, et al. (2010). The effects of early and late-season fires on mortality,
dispersal, physiology and breeding of red-backed fairy-wrens (Malurus melanocephalus).
Wildlife Research 37, 145-155.
Noble, J. C. (1989). Fire studies in mallee (Eucalyptus spp.) communities of western New South
Wales: the effects of fires applied in different seasons on herbage productivity and their
implications for management. Australian Journal of Ecology 14, 169-187.
O'Reilly, L., D. Ogada, et al. (2006). Effects of fire on bird diversity and abundance in an East
African savanna. African Journal of Ecology 44, 165-170.
Pearson, R. G. & T. P. Dawson (2003). Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of
species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology & Biogeography 12, 361371.
Perry, J., A. Fisher, et al. (In Press). Status and habitat of the Carpentarian grasswren (Amytornis
dorotheae) in the Northern Territory. Emu.
Phillips, S. J., R. P. Anderson, et al. (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic
distributions. Ecological Modelling 190, 231-259.
Pitman, A. J., G. T. Narisma, et al. (2007). The impact of climate change on the risk of forest and
grassland fires in Australia. Climatic Change 84, 383-401.
Prates-Clark, C. D. C., S. S. Saatchi, et al. (2008). Predicting geographical distribution models of
high-value timber trees in the Amazon Basin using remotely sensed data. Ecological
Modelling 211, 309-323.
Price, O. & D. M. J. S. Bowman (1994). Fire-stick forestry: a matrix model in support of skilful fire
management of Callitris intratropica R. T. Baker by north Australian Aborigenes. Journal of
Biogeography 21, 573-580.
Reside, A. E., J. J. VanDerWal, et al. (2010). Weather, Not Climate, Defines Distributions of Vagile
Bird Species. PLoS ONE 5, e13569.
Roques, K. G., T. G. O'Connor, et al. (2001). Dynamics of shrub encroachment in an African
savanna: relative influences of fire, herbivory, rainfall and density dependence. Journal of
Applied Ecology 38, 268-280.
Rowley, I. & E. Russell (1993). The Purple-crowned Fairy-wren Malurus coronatus. II. Breeding
Biology, Social organization, Demography and Management. Emu 93, 235-250.
Russell-Smith, J. (2002). Pre-contact Aboriginal, and contemporary fire regimes of the savanna
landscapes of northern Australia: patterns, changes and ecological processes. Australian Fire
Regimes: Contemporary Patterns (April 1998-March 2000) and Changes Since European
Settlement. (ed. by J. Russell-Smith, R. Craig, A. M. Gill, R. Smith and J. Williams).
Australia State of the Environment Second Technical Paper Series (Biodiversity), Department
of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra.
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
Russell-Smith, J. & D. M. J. S. Bowman (1992). Conservation of monsoon rainforest isolates in the
Northern Territory, Australia. Biological Conservation 59, 51-63.
Sirami, C., C. Seymour, et al. (2009). The impact of shrub encroachment on savanna bird diversity
from local to regional scale. Diversity and Distributions 15, 948-957.
Stephens, S. L. & L. W. Ruth (2005). Federal forest-fire policy in the United States. Ecological
Applications 15, 532-542.
Uys, R. G., W. J. Bond, et al. (2004). The effect of different fire regimes on plant diversity in southern
African grasslands. Biological Conservation 118, 489-499.
Valentine, L. E., L. Schwarzkopf, et al. (2007). Burning season influences the response of bird
assemblages to fire in tropical savannas. Biological Conservation 137, 90-101.
Vanderwal, J., L. P. Shoo, et al. (2009). Abundance and the environmental niche: environmental
suitability estimated from niche models predicts the upper limit of local abundance. The
American Naturalist 174, 282-291.
Westerling, A. L., H. G. Hidalgo, et al. (2006). Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S.
forest wildfire activity. Science 313, 940-943.
Williams, A. A. J., D. J. Karoly, et al. (2001). The sensitivity of Australian fire danger to climate
change. Climatic Change 49, 171-191.
Williams, R. J., J. Carter, et al. (2005). Carbon accounting, land management, science and policy
uncertainty in Australian savanna landscapes: introduction and overview. Australian Journal
of Botany 53, 583-588.
Williams, R. J., A. D. Griffiths, et al. (2002). Fire regimes and biodiversity in the savannas of
northern Australia. Flammable Australia: The Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent.
(ed. by R. A. Bradstock, J. E. Williams and A. M. Gill). Cambridge University Press.
Woinarski, J. C. Z. (1990). Effects of fire on the bird communities of tropical woodlands and open
forests in northern Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 15, 1-22.
Woinarski, J. C. Z., M. Armstrong, et al. (2010). Monitoring indicates rapid and severe decline of
native small mammals in Kakadu National Park, northern Australia. Wildlife Research 37,
116-126.
Woinarski, J. C. Z., C. Brock, et al. (1999). Response of birds and reptiles to fire regimes on pastoral
land in the Victoria River District, Northern Territory. Rangeland Journal 21, 24-38.
Woinarski, J. C. Z., D. J. Milne, et al. (2001). Changes in mammal populations in relatively intact
landscapes of Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia. Austral Ecology 26, 360370.
Woinarski, J. C. Z., J. Risler, et al. (2004). Response of vegetation and vertebrate fauna to 23 years of
fire exclusion in a tropical Eucalyptus open forest, Northern Territory, Australia. Austral
Ecology 29, 156-176.
590
Figure 1. Environmental space plots and Maxent variable response curves for four exemplar species
591
within the Australian tropical savannas. The species shown are Gouldian finch Erythrura gouldiae
592
((a) environmental space plot and (b), Maxent response curves), red-backed fairy-wren Malurus
593
melanocephalus (c, d), star finch Neochmia ruficauda (e, f) and white-streaked honeyeater Trichodere
594
cockerelli (g, h). The environmental space plots (a, c, e, g) show the available fire frequency and late-
595
fire frequency versus annual rainfall. Results for the whole ATS region in greyscale. Darker grey
596
represents greater prevalence. The values of fire frequency and late-fire frequency versus annual
597
rainfall for which the species have been recorded is shown in yellow-to-red scale. For the species, the
598
lighter colour (yellow) represents the most records, where the red represents fewer. The response
599
curves (b, d, f, h) show the probability of presence of each species depending on the fire frequency or
600
late-fire frequency, assuming that each of these variables in turn are the only variable in the model.
Figure captions:
601
602
Figure 2. The proportional change in suitable area for species from the current levels of fire
603
frequency (a, c, e, g) and late-fire frequency (b, d, f, h), to a six-increment increases in fire frequency
604
variables, for the same four species within Australian tropical savannas as in Fig 1. In the maps, the
605
dark blue represents area that is always suitable, the dark grey is always unsuitable, and the light blue
606
is the area that has changed in suitability. For the plots, the Y-axis represents the proportion of the
607
entire Australian tropical savanna region that is suitable, depending whether the fire frequency is at
608
current levels (0) or increasing by each factor 1 – 6.
609
610
Figure 3. Histogram representing the Pearson correlation (ρ) for the relationship between increasing
611
fire frequency or late-fire frequency and the proportion of suitable habitat for each species. Figure 2a
612
shows the ρ for 44 species largely confined to the northern Australian savannas, whereas 2b shows the
613
ρ for 207 species (inclusive of the original 44), which incorporates species found outside the savanna.
614
Model results that do not include the full range of species’ environmental tolerances should be treated
615
with caution.
616
617
618
619
Table 1. The mean, standard deviation and range of percentage contributions that each variable made
620
to the Maxent models for the 44 species.
Variable
Mean ± Standard Deviation
Range
Fire Frequency
3.9 ± 4.5
0.6 – 23.1
Late-Fire Frequency
3.1 ± 2.7
0.04 – 11.9
Mean Annual Temperature
7.9 ± 10.1
0.3 – 61.5
Temperature Seasonality
24.3 ± 17.2
0.9 – 67.5
8.9 ± 8.3
0.8 – 38.2
Annual Precipitation
37.8 ± 22.1
2.6 – 78.3
Precipitation Seasonality
10.6 ± 11.5
0.3 – 50.7
3.3 ± 3.4
0.1 – 15.0
Max Temp Warmest Period
Precipitation Driest Quarter
621
622
623
624
625
Table 2. The number (and percentage) of the 44 modelled species predicted to face an increase or
626
decrease in suitable area as a result of a factor of six increase in both fire frequency and late-fire
627
frequency. The mean change in suitable area (either increase or decrease) and standard error are
628
shown.
629
Fire Frequency
Mean Change in
Late-fire
Mean Change in
Increase
Suitable Area
Frequency Increase
Suitable Area
# increasing species
15
(34%)
4.4% ± 3.2
1
(2%)
0.8% ± 0
# decreasing species
29
(66%)
9.4% ± 7.4
43
(98%)
7.2% ± 6.2