Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Tumor Responses and Preliminary Survival Data in A Phase 2 Trial of Ofranergene Obadenovec (VB-111) Combined with Paclitaxel in Patients with Recurrent Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer CANCER CENTER 1 BACKGROUND VB-111 is A Novel, First-in-class Anti-cancer Gene Therapy • First-in-class, novel, targeted anti-angiogenic gene-therapy agent with applicability for multiple solid tumor indications • Mechanism: »» Based on an Ad5 viral vector that targets angiogenic endothelium, leading to apoptosis »» Broad anti-angiogenic activity - leads to tumor starvation and immune response »» Effective in combination therapy • Efficacy signal demonstrated in three tumor-specific Phase 2 trials • Safe and well tolerated in over 170 cancer patients • Convenience - simple IV infusion, once every 2 months • Regulatory Incentives: SPA, Fast Track, Orphan Drug Status Ovarian Cancer • Ovarian cancer is diagnosed in approximately 22,000 American women each year, and is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancers; Disease is difficult to detect, and often only diagnosed when advanced • Most patients ultimately develop platinum-resistant relapse • Anti-angiogenic therapy has been shown to be efficacious in ovarian cancer. Bevacizumab was recently shown to improve PFS (but not OS) in combination with chemotherapy, in platinumresistant recurrent ovarian cancer (AURELIA trial*) * J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(13):1302-8 HARVARD 2 1 1 MEDICAL SCHOOL 2 Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, VBL Therapeutics, Or Yehuda, Israel 2 3 RESULTS Efficacy Signal in Ovarian Cancer Doubled, Compared with Historical Data Patient Characteristics Efficacy Signal GCIG CA-125 – 60% Response Rate • 21 patients with recurrent Platinum-Resistant Müllerian cancer, enrolled at Massachusetts General Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA and received up to 7 doses of treatment • All patients had measurable disease • Intra-patient dose escalation was allowed • 2 treatment groups: low dose vs. therapeutic dose treatment 9 of the 15 evaluable patients (60%) at the therapeutic dose level CA-125 response (defined as 50% reduction): VB-111 + paclitaxel had a CA-125 response (defined as 50% reduction in CA-125) vs. chemotherapy ± bevacizumab (AURELIA trial) Low Dose Treatment N=4 3x1012 VPs + 40mg/80 paclitaxel Therapeutic Dose Treatment N=17 1x1013 VPs + 80 paclitaxel Characteristic Characteristic No. (%)No. (%) Age Age Median Median 65 65 Range Range 41-79 41-79 Grade at Grade diagnosis at diagnosis IA IA 1 (5%) 1 (5%) IB IB 1 (5%) 1 (5%) IC IC 1 (5%) 1 (5%) IIIC IIIC 12 (57%) 12 (57%) IV IV 6 (29%)6 (29%) Histology Histology PapillaryPapillary serous serous 9 (43%)9 (43%) Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma 4 (19%)4 (19%) Carcinosarcoma Carcinosarcoma 3 (14%)3 (14%) Clear cell Clear cell 2 (10%)2 (10%) Clear cell/Serous Clear cell/Serous 1 (5%) 1 (5%) Transitional/Serous Transitional/Serous 1 (5%) 1 (5%) Serous/Serous/ 1 (5%) 1 (5%) Mixed mullerian Mixed mullerian tumor components tumor components Characteristic Characteristic No. (%)No. (%) PROGNOSTIC PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FACTORS ECOG performance ECOG performance status status 0 0 10 (48%) 10 (48%) 1 1 11 (52%) 11 (52%) Platinum Platinum free interval free interval (months) (months) < 3 (platinum < 3 (platinum refractory) refractory) 10 (48%) 10 (48%) ≥3 ≥3 11 (52%) 11 (52%) Measurable Measurable disease, disease, SLD, cm SLD, (n=20) cm (n=20) 1 to < 5 1 to < 5 9 (45%)9 (45%) ≥5 ≥5 11 (55%) 11 (55%) Baseline Baseline CA-125 CA-125 ≥ 100 U/ml ≥ 100 U/ml 14 (67%) 14 (67%) Prior VEGF Prior VEGF Bevacizumab Bevacizumab 9 (43%)9 (43%) Cederanib Cederanib 2 (10%)2 (10%) Prior lines Prior oflines therapy of therapy MedianMedian (range)(range) 3 (1-4) 3 (1-4) Mean Mean 2.6 2.6 % Patients with CA-125 Response % CA-125 Change- Best Response 200% 185% 150% Non-refractory, Therapeutic Dose Refractory, Therapeutic Dose Non-refractory, Low Dose Refractory, Low Dose 127% 110% 100% VB-111 + paclitaxel VB-111 + TAX atattherapeutic therapeuticdose dose 60.0% AURELIA trial* 50% 50% 40% 14% chemotherapy Chemotherapy 70% 60% 103% bevacizumab + chemotherapy BEV + Chemotherapy 31.8% 30% 0% -4% -50% -13% -27% 20% -41% -44% -55% -64% -69% -100% 11.6% 10% -79% -92% -96% -96% -98% -98% 0% * J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(13):1302-8 Durable Disease Control & Responses % Change in CA-125 % Change RECIST (sum of longest diameters) Study VB−111−157 VB−111+ Paclitaxel: % change in CA−125 10 Low−Refractory 300 Safety Low−Non−Refractory Therapeutic−Refractory VB-111 was found to be safe and well tolerated: • 8 serious adverse events were reported, 2 were considered by the investigator to be possibly related to VB-111 • Most frequent AEs included: fatigue, fever, neutropenia, diarrhea • No dose limiting toxicities were reported at any dose level VB-111 Induced Antitumor Immune-Response Cytotoxic CD8 T-cells and apoptotic cancer cells detected following treatment with VB-111 STUDY DESIGN • Design: A Phase 1/2, dose escalation study • Study objectives: »» Evaluate safety and tolerability and identify dose limiting toxicity in combination of VB-111 and weekly paclitaxel »» Explore efficacy (RECIST response, CA-125 response, PFS and OS) in an expanded cohort of the optimally tolerated dose of combination VB-111 and weekly paclitaxel • Patient population: Recurrent Platinum-Resistant Müllerian Cancer 12 13 • Intervention: VB-111 3x10 - 1x10 VPs q2m I.V. in combination with weekly paclitaxel, until disease progression THE Richard T Penson , Suzanne Berlin , Ashley M Hanbury , Amalia N Gonzalez , Siobhan A. Collins , 1 2 3 3 Michael J Birrer , Suzanne M Campos , Andi Lubitz , Yael C. Cohen 1 VB-111 Pt 1 VB-111 Pt 2 Control Pt 1 Control Pt 2 CD8 (x400) H&E (x400) Biopsies were obtained from patients with Recurrent Platinum-Resistant Müllerian Cancer. H&E and Immunohistochemistry staining with anti-CD8 show regions of apoptotic tumor cells (red circles) and increased tumor infiltrating CD8 lymphocytes in VB-111 treated patients. Significant Increase in Overall Survival Median OS: 810 vs. 172 days therapeutic dose (n=17) vs. low dose (n=4) P=0.042 % change from baseline MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL 200 Therapeutic−Non−Refractory 16 1 7 100 2 4 0 21 20 13 11 8 12 −100 0 3 18 5 100 19 9 Time 14 (days) 15 17 200 6 300 400 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS • VB-111 was safe and well tolerated in patients with recurrent Platinum-Resistant Müllerian cancer in combination with paclitaxel, toxicity was similar to that expected with antiangiogenics and taxanes in this patient population • Efficacy signal: In a population with 50% platinum refractoriness and 52% prior antiangiogenics »» CA-125 response seen at a favorable rate of 60% (9/15) with a dose response pattern at the therapeutic dose level »» significant increase in OS at therapeutic vs. low dose level (810 vs. 172 days, p=0.042) • Immunotherapeutic effect: cytotoxic CD8 T-cells and apoptotic cancer cells detected following treatment with VB-111