Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
SYNOPSIS Name of Sponsor/ Company Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Name of Finished Product ACTEMRA Name of Active Ingredient tocilizumab Title of Study Investigators Study centre(s) Publication (reference) Clinical Pharmacology Study of MRA in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Renal Impairment Yukio Yuzawa and Kiyoshi Takasugi Nagoya University Hospital, Nephrology Department and Dohgo Spa Hospital, Internal Medicine Department None Studied Period (date of first enrolment) 13 January 2005 - 6 October 2005 (date of last complete) Phase of development Clinical pharmacology study The objectives are to investigate the blood pharmacokinetics of Objectives MRA after single administration in rheumatoid arthritis patients with renal impairment, and to evaluate safety as well. The blood pharmacokinetics of MRA are investigated after single Methodology intravenous infusion of the drug at a dose of 8 mg/kg in rheumatoid arthritis patients with renal impairment in an open-label study, and safety is also evaluated. Patients will be included using the creatinine clearance (CrCL) values as defined below. Renal impairme nt classificat Number of patients (planned and analysed ) CrCL (mL/min) Target sample size Moderate Severe (No renal impairme 80 ≥ CrCL > 50 50 ≥ CrCL > 30 30 ≥ CrCL > 10 CrCL > 80 d patient s ion Mil Enrolle Safety evaluation set Pharmacokineti c analysis set FAS ≥4 4 4 ≥4 5 5 No limit 3 3 2 2 Exclude d as nt) subjects Total ― 10 14 14 Main inclusion criteria Patients with RA duration of 6 months or more Patients whose ESR (Westergren method) is ≥30 mm/hr or CRP is ≥1.0 mg/dL Main exclusion criteria Patients assessed as having Class IV Steinbrocker functional Diagnosis and main criteria for activity inclusion Patients who have been treated for the underlying disease with a biological agent (infliximab or etanercept, etc.) or leflunomide Patients who received the drugs and therapies that may affect evaluation of drug efficacy Other patients who are unsuitable for safety reason <0}{0>その 他、治験責任医師あるいは治験分担医師が不適当と判断した患者 <}0{>s Investigational product,: MRA (Tocilizumab [recombinant]) Test product, dose and mode of Dose and method of administration: 8 administration, batch number intravenously drip infused over 1 hour. mg/kg MRA is Lot No.: MR4C05A Duration of treatment 35 days Reference therapy, dose and mode of administration, batch A comparator is not used in this study. number Pharmacokinetics Serum MRA concentration and pharmacokinetic parameters Criteria for evaluation after administration of MRA. Efficacy ACR20 response rate, Time course of DAS28 from baseline Safety Pharmacokinetics The maximum serum drug concentration (Cmax), area under the serum Statistical method drug concentration-time curve (AUC), apparent elimination rate constant (kel), elimination half-life (t1/2), total clearance (CL), volume of distribution (Vd), volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) and mean residence time (MRT), etc., are determined for each patient from the serum MRA concentrations. The Cmax is determined from the actual measured values, the AUC is determined using the trapezoidal rule (linear/log trapezoidal rule) and the terminal elimination phase is extrapolated using the linear least squares method. The profile of the serum drug concentration for each patient is graphed and summary statistics are calculated at each time by renal impairment class.The pharmacokinetic parameters are plotted according to the distribution, and the summary statistics are calculated. In addition, an exploration is conducted into the effects on pharmacokinetic parameters due to the deterioration of renal function. Efficacy For both FAS and PPS, time courses of continuous scale variables are plotted, and nominal and ordinal scale variables are represented in table form using a suitable method such as cross-tabulation by time point, etc. The 95% confidence intervals at each time point are estimated for the above-mentioned variables. Pharmacokinetics The serum MRA concentration slowly decreased after treatment and followed a similar time course for all of the renal impairment classes. The Cmax did not differ as a result of the degree of renal impairment, but the AUCfin was slightly greater in the patients with severe renal impairment than in the patients of the other renal impairment classes. Summary - Conclusions Examination of the relationship between baseline CrCL and the Cmax and AUCfin, the coefficient of correlation with CrCL was small for both parameters. Efficacy The ACR20 response rate for the patients as a whole was 28.6% (4 of 14 patients). The ACR20 response rate by renal impairment class was 25.0% (1 of 4 patients) in the patients with mild renal impairment, 20.0% (1 of 5 patients) in the patients with moderate renal impairment, 33.3% (1 of 3 patients) in the patients with severe renal impairment and 50.0% (1 of 2 patients) in the patients without renal impairment. The DAS28 score on Day 28 after treatment was similarly decreased in all of the groups. Safety The incidence did not differ as a result of the degree of renal impairment. The most common events (PT) were increased blood triglycerides and eczema. There were no events that appeared to have been attributable to renal impairment. Serious adverse events consisted of a skin ulcer and peripheral neuropathy with moderate renal impairment. The outcome was “resolved/recovered” for the skin ulcer and “improved” for peripheral neuropathy. None of the laboratory test variables showed clinically problematic changes and renal function did not worsen either. Conclusions The degree of renal impairment did not have any effect on the pharmacokinetics of MRA. Based on these results, dosage of MRA therefore does not need to be adjusted even if the patient has rheumatoid arthritis with renal impairment. Date of report 8 July 2011