Download 2016 Press Book

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Cataract wikipedia , lookup

Human eye wikipedia , lookup

Corneal transplantation wikipedia , lookup

Blast-related ocular trauma wikipedia , lookup

Cataract surgery wikipedia , lookup

Dry eye syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
PascaleCommunications,LLC
TradePressClipbook
2016
Tearscience
Publication
ArticleTitle
KOL
Date
Optometric Physician Off the Cuff: The Best of 2016
Art Epstein OD
December
Ocular Surgery News Tiny thoughtlets to ring in the New
Year
Darrell White, MD
December
Advanced Ocular
Care
Eyelid Heat Treatment Leads to Fast Sarah Henderson, December
DED Resolution
BS
Advanced Ocular
Care/ Glaucoma
Today
Identification and Prevention of Dry
Eye Disease
Sheri Rowen, MD
and Steven Vold,
MD
December
Advanced Ocular
Care
The Future of Dry Eye and MGD
Technologies
Joe Boorady, OD
December
Advanced Ocular
Care
Business Perspective
Joe Boorady, OD
December
Ocular Surgery News Children with blepharitis often require Richard Lindstrom, December
specialized care
MD
Ophthalmology
Management
New and Notable at AAO
News
Optometric
Scan for MGD
Scott Schacter,
Management
OD
Ocular Surgery News BLOG: Microblepharoexfoliation and Hovanesian, MD
biofilms: The future of dry eye and
blepharitis treatment?
December
December
November
Women in Optometry Vision, Beauty, and Health are
(Review of Optometry Intertwined
Supplement)
Bridgitte Shen Lee, November
OD
Ophthalmic
Professional
Three's a Charm
Horizon Eye
Center
November
Review of
Ophthalmology
Treating Dry Eye: Beyond Drops
Sheppard, MD
November
Review of
Ophthalmology
Managing Dry Eye Patients Step by Step Mark Milner, MD
November
Ophthalmology
Business
The “opportunity” in dry eye is the Patti Barkey
November
chance to improve patient
Review of Optometry outcomes
All In On Dry Eye
Jennifer Lyerly, OD November
Optometry Times
How to establish value in the minds
of contact lens wearers
Crystal Brimer, OD November
CRSToday
Business Perspective
Joe Boorady, OD November
Ocular Surgery News VIDEO: LipiFlow, LipiView help
Matossian, MD
educate patients on meibomian gland
dysfunction
November
Ocular Surface News How long should/can a patient go
between Lipiflow treatments?
Scott Schacter, OD November
Optometry Times
Newsletter
Incorporating meibomian gland
imaging
Eric Botts, OD
Advanced Ocular
Care
Rationale for Aggressive
Management of MGD
Preeya Gupta, MD October
ME Live
Optimizing the Ocular Surface
Ivan Mac, MD
October
Ophthalmology
Times
Looking beyond the surface of
cornea, OSD mechanisms
Periman, MD
October
White, MD
October
Ocular Surgery News Corneal basement membrane
dystrophy: Dry eye disease’s sticky
wicket
October
Tearscience
Publication
ArticleTitle
KOL
Date
Review of Cornea
and Contact Lenses
The Chicken-and-Egg Problem of
MGD and Contact Lens Wear
Arthur Epstein, OD October
Optometry Times
The Power of the Celebrity
Spokesperson
O'Dell, OD
Optometric Office
HEALING THERAPIES FOR
PATIENTS WITH DRY EYE
Gina Wesley, OD, October
MS, FAAO
Primary Care
Optometry News
Identify type of dry eye to ensure
successful therapy
Whitney Hauser,
OD
October
Vision Monday
Saving Boomers' Sight
October
EyeWorld
Battling dry eye with nutritional
supplements
Whitney Hauser,
OD
Clifford Salinger,
MD
Ophthalmology
Management
‘A different layer of caution’ exists
Cynthia Matossian, October
MD; Greg
Parkhurst, MD; and
Shachar Tauber,
MD
Ocular Surgery
News Blog
BLOG: A Year of Relief From a
Single LipiFlow Treatment
Darrell White, MD October
CRSToday
Do You Need a Helping Hand?
Robert J.
Weinstock, MD
October
Primary Care
Optometry News
Explore ocular surface in patients
with visual complaints
Marc
Bloomenstein,
OD FAAO
TearScience: Meibomian imager well News
received
9/15/16
Primary Care
Optometry News
October
October
September
Ocular Surgery News Speaker relates approach to dry eye Sam Garg
therapy
September
Review of Cornea
News Brief on duration study
and Contact Lenses
News
September
Optometric Office
Gina Wesley, OD, September
MS, FAAO
Sharing is Caring
Ocular Surgery News VIDEO: Speaker gives update on dry Keith A. Walter,
eye therapies
MD
September
Ocular Surgery News Prevention measures, patient
education mitigate postop dry eye
and dissatisfaction
Alice Epitropoulos, September
MD, FACS
Optometric
Management
Get in Front of It
Whitney Hauser,
OD
September
Advanced Ocular
Care
The Vicious Cycle of MGD and
Glaucoma
Robert Noecker,
MD
September
Advanced Ocular
Care
Meeting the Eye Care Needs of
Student Athletes
Bridgitte Shen Lee, September
OD
CRSToday Europe
The Best Ways to Spend Your Money Michael Lawless
Ophthalmology
Times Europe
Portable device offers rapid highdefinition meibomian gland imaging
Preeya Gupta
September
EyeWire TV
Coverage of duration study release
News
September
MarketScope
TearScience Study: LipiFlow
Improves MGD, Dry Eye through 12
Months
Press Release
August
Tearscience
Publication
ArticleTitle
KOL
Date
Ophthalmology Web
TearScience Announces Long Term Press Release
Study Results for LipiFlow Treatment
August
EyeWire
A Single LipiFlow Treatment
Demonstrates Sustained
Improvement in Gland Function
and Symptoms in Patients with
MGD and Dry Eye
Press Release
August
Ophthalmology
Management
Three Beneficial Diagnostic Options
Donaldson, MD,
August
Epitropolous, MD,
McDonald, MD,
Matossian, MD
Ophthalmology
Management
Changing Dry Eye Treatment
Donaldson, MD, August
Epitropolous, MD,
McDonald, MD,
Matossian, MD
Glaucoma Today
What Every Glaucoma Doctor Should Sheri Rowen, MD
Know About DED
Ophthalmology
Times
Portable device offers rapid highdefinition meibomian gland
imaging
Just Use Warm Compresses?
Preeya Gupta, MD August
Ophthalmology
Management
Giving Birth to a Dry Eye Clinic
Patti Barkey,
August
Sheetal Shah MD,
Zachary Smith
Ophthalmology
Management
When Beauty Doesn't Blink
Periman, MD and
O'Dell, MD
Advanced Ocular
Care
Beauty Does Not Have to Hurt
Leslie E. O’Dell,
July/August
OD; Amy Gallant
Sullivan; and Laura
M. Periman, MD
Advanced Ocular
Care
Antiaging Eye Care and Aesthetics
Bridgitte Shen Lee, July/August
OD
Advanced Ocular
Care
Optimize the Ocular Surface
Barry Lee, MD
Advanced Ocular
Care
A Dry Eye Decision Tree
Jason Schmit, OD July/August
Ophthalmology
Management
August
K.D. Barnebey
August
(Clinical
coordiantor at
Specialty Eye Care
Centre)
August
July/August
Review of Optometric Invest in Technology to Grow Your
Business
Dry Eye Services
Peter Cass, OD
July
Ocular Surgery News Testosterone cream may provide
relief from MGD-related dry eye
Brian S. Boxer
Wachler, MD
July
Optometric
Management
Bloomenstein, OD July
DED Symptom Solutions
Ocular Surgery News Are Dry Eye Spas Worth Adopting?
CRSToday
Adjunct Treatments for Dry Eye
Disease
Optometric Office
One to One - TearScience's Joe
Boorady
Mitchell Jackson,
MD
Rohit Shetty,
FRCS, PhD; and
Harsha Nagaraja,
MS, FCE
July
Joe Boorady
July
July
Tearscience
Publication
ArticleTitle
KOL
Date
Optometric Office
Buzz - TearScience Creates Dry Eye News
Education Site
July
Ophthalmology
Management
MGD’s Multimodal Treatment
Epstein, Mac,
Epitropolous
July Supplement
Ophthalmology
Management
A Deeper Understanding of MGD
Epstein, Mac,
July Epitropolous,
Supplement
Rosenfeld, Barnett,
Sindt
Millennial Eye
Full Speed Ahead (video interviews)
Joe Boorady
July
Optometric
Management
Screen for Lid Hygiene
Melissa Barnett,
OD
July
Advanced Ocular
Care
AccessWire
Is It MGD? (MGD general
education)
New Treatments for Contact Lens
Intolerance On The Rise
Hauser
June
Art Epstein, OD
June
Review of
TearScience LipiScan Debuts
Ophthalmology
Review of Optometry Diagnostic Technology - New MGD
Imaging Device
News
June
News
June
Ocular Surgery News Treating dry eye in the surgical
patient: One doctor’s simple
algorithm
Darrell White, MD
June
Advanced Ocular
Care
Making the Ocular Surface a Priority
Matossian, MD
June
Optometric Office
New Product Gallery - LipiScan
News
June
Optometry Times
Descemet, Munson, Bowman, and
more
Tracy Schroeder
Swartz, OD
June
CRSToday
The Value of Objective Data in
Evaluating DED
Pepose, MD
June
Wachler, MD
June
Ocular Surgery News Testosterone cream may provide
relief from MGD-related dry eye
Optometric
Management
OD Notebook - DryEyeandMGD.com News
mention
June
Contact Lens
Spectrum
Product Spectrum
News
June
Ophthalmology
Management
Starting Your Dry Eye Center of
Excellence
Sheppard, MD
June
Ophthalmology
Management
Your DED Search-and-Destroy
Mission
Matossian, MD
June
Ophthalmology
Management
When DED Hits Home
McDonald,
June
Periman,
Solomon,
Davidian,
Becker June
Darrell White
Ocular Surgery News Blog: Dry Eye at ASCRS
Review of Optometry Improve Your Understanding of
Meibomian Gland Function -—and
Dysfunction
Leanna Olennikov, May
OD, Derek
Cunningham, OD,
and Walter
Whitley, OD,
Review of Optometry Tools of the Trade: Current
Techniques to Treat Meibomian
Gland Dysfunction
Gregory Moore,
OD
May
Optometric Office
Kading, OD
May
Bye Bye Dry Eyes
Tearscience
Publication
ArticleTitle
KOL
Kieval, MD
Date
CRSToday
Marketing Your Practice Across
Multiple Generations
May
Review of
Ophthalmology
The Form and Function of Meibomian Abelson, MD
Glands
Review of
Ophthalmology
Dry Eye: What’s New in Diagnostics
& Treatment
Sheppard, Latkany May
Ocular Surgery
News/ Ocular
Surgery News
Europe
CRSToday Europe
Use of Diagnostic and Therapeutic
Tools Improves Dry Eye Detection
and Management
Piovella, MD
May
Across the Pond - Surgical Sense
Lee, MD
May
Primary Care
Optometry News
Emerging best practices improve
Gaddie, OD
ocular surface outcomes in glaucoma
patients
May
May
Ocular Surgery News TearScience Releases Dynamic
Meibomian Glad Imager
News
May
Ophthalmology
Times
In-office treatments for MGD may
provide relief
News
May
Ophthalmology
Management
Quick Bits - TearScience Launches
DryEyeandMGD.com
News
May
Ophthalmology Web
TearScience Launches LipiScan for
HD Meibomian Imaging
News
May
EyeWire Today
TearScience Introduces LipiScan for News
Rapid High-Definition Meibomian
Imaging
May
Ocular Surgery
News
VIDEO: Surgeon talks about new
device for meibomian gland
imaging
Preeya Gupta, MD May
Ocular Surgery News VIDEO: TearScience introduces
LipiScan meibomian gland imager
Joe Boorady
May
Optometry Times
How MGD Can Work for Your
Practice
Whitley
April
CRSToday
Optimize the Ocular Surface
Lee
April
Eyetube OD
Review of
Ophthalmology
How to Develop a Dry Eye Center
Caring for the Eye’s Gatekeepers
Hauser
Abelman
April
April
Ocular Surgery News Looking Back at a Year of LipiFlow
White
March
CRSToday
Automating Follow-up Care
Hovanesian, MD
March
Ophthalmology
Times
In-office MGD treatments may
provide relief but lack formal
studies
Vanessa Caceres March
Ophthalmology
Times
When Old, New Technologies
Converge for Dry Eye Diagnosis
Glasser
March
Ophthalmic
Professional
In Brief - TearScience Sales Spiked
in 2015
News
March
Ophthalmology
Management
Dry eye algorithms from the trenches McDonald, MD
March
Ophthalmology
Management
It's Not Your Father's Cornea Care
March
Rhee, MD
Tearscience
Publication
ArticleTitle
KOL
Date
Ophthalmic
Professional
What You Need to Get Started
Patty Barkey, CEO March
of Bowden Eye &
Associates
Ophthalmic
Professional
Our Unique Approach to Dry Eye in
Rural Georgia
Shah, MD
February
Ophthalmic
Professional
Taking Ocular Surface Treatment to
the Next Level
Donaldson, MD
February
Ophthalmic
Professional
Overview of a Successful Dry Eye
Center of Excellence
Sheppard, MD
February
Ophthalmic
Professional
Deciphering the Dry Eye Code
Jackson, MD
February
Advanced Ocular
Care
A Conversation on Dry Eye
Diagnostics
Cunningham, OD
and Claypool, OD
February
CRSToday Europe
Across the Pond: My Algorithm for
DED
Epitropoulos
February
CRSToday Europe
Across the Pond: OSD - A Review
Fahmy, OD
February
Ocular Surgery News Wide Range of Treatments Available Lam, MD
to Optimize Ocular Surface
February
Optometric
Management
Diagnosing Dry Eye
Barnett, MD
February
Optometric
Management
The Medical Economics of Dry Eye
Devries, MD
February
Healio.com
VIDEO: Surgeon discusses
advantages of standard operating
protocol for managing dry eye
diseases
Yeu
February
Healio.com
Dry eye a common but still oftenoverlooked condition
Hafezi
February
EyeWorld
Targeting better care for patients with Gupta
evaporative tear dysfunction
My Algorithm for DED
Epitropoulos
February
Healio.com
VIDEO: Surgeon gives tips for
Epitropoulos
treating lid margin, dry eye disease
January
CRSToday
More Options in Dry Eye
Therapeutics
Stonecipher
January
Karpecki
January
CRSToday
Review of Optometry The Dry Eye Deluge
1/15/16
Ocular Surgery News OSN round table, part 2: Optimization Trattler
of the ocular surface
January
CRSToday
OSD: A Review
Fahmy
January
Millennial Eye
Dry Eye Disease: Creating More
Awareness
Alice T.
January
Epitropoulos, MD;
Neda Shamie, MD
Eyeworld
Management oft the Irregular Cornea Tips for Using Topographic Ablation
Karl Stonecipher,
MD
Advanced Ocular
Care
2015: OSD Year in Review
Ahmad M. Fahmy, 12/15/15
OD, FAAO, Dipl
ABO
January
12/12/2016
Optometric Management
Article Date: 12/1/2016
DIAGNOSTIC FOCUS
SCAN FOR MGD
LIPISCAN PROVIDES HIGH­DEFINITION IMAGES OF THE
MEIBOMIAN GLANDS
SCOTT SCHACHTER, O.D.
A 16­YEAR­OLD male presented for his annual exam complaining of watery eyes. His history revealed
up to 5 hours per day of video game usage. After a brief explanation regarding the technology, we
gathered stunning images of his meibomian glands using LipiScan, from TearScience.
OVERVIEW
The LipiScan Dynamic Meibomian Imager captures and stores digital images of the upper and lower
meibomian glands. The device works quickly; total time from patient data entry to completed image
acquisition of the lower lids can be well under 90 seconds. Image capture itself takes about 5 to 10
seconds per eye. The autofocus feature ensures sharp, HD­quality images, which are placed in a shared
folder and can be viewed in exam rooms. The device also has a small footprint, at 16 in. x 12.4 in x 18.4
in.
PROCEDURE
Patient data is entered; he or she places his or her chin in the rest, looks up, and the lower lid is everted
using a small tool. Image capture occurs with the push of a button.
TRAINING
A TearScience trainer spent the day working with staff members, who were able to acquire quality
images by the end of the day.
PRACTICE BENEFITS/ROI
http://www.optometricmanagement.com/printarticle.aspx?articleID=115103
1/2
12/12/2016
Optometric Management
We decided to undergo a period of scanning every patient. During this time, we discovered apparent
meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in patients as young as age 12. As a result, we are now identifying
the disease earlier and, thus, intervening earlier. We also are able to track disease progress through time.
Patients have been very interested in seeing their images. It has been my experience that they are more
likely to “buy in” to the importance of treatment and follow­up visits when they can see and better
understand their condition.
The patient’s right lower lid image with LipiScan.
In catching and addressing patients’ MGD earlier, we offer a high level of care. We also have seen
increased revenue via the use of LipiFlow, also from TearScience, a debridement­scaling technique,
nutraceuticals, warm compresses and lipid­based artificial tears.
LipiScan is billable to insurance carriers if you establish the medical necessity. It may be reimbursable
under CPT code 92285 in some markets. However, check with your local carrier.
PATIENT OUTCOME
With the LipiScan, I was able to see that the aforementioned patient was missing most of his meibomian
glands. I educated him on the importance of taking breaks from video games every 20 minutes,
prescribed blinking exercises and non­preserved artificial tears q.i.d. OM
DR. SCHACHTER is founder of Advanced Eyecare and the Eyewear Gallery Optometry in
Pismo Beach, Calif., where he specializes in contact lens and dry eye treatment and
diagnosis. He also serves as administrator, California Central Coast Area for Vision
Source and as adjunct clinical professor at Marshall B. Ketchum University in Fullerton,
Calif. Dr. Schachter is a Bausch + Lomb contact lens expert and a CORE speaker and key
opinion leader for Allergan. Visit tinyurl.com/OMcomment to comment.
Optometric Management, Volume: 51 , Issue: December 2016, page(s): 60
http://www.optometricmanagement.com/printarticle.aspx?articleID=115103
2/2
FORWARD THINKING
BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE
Ophthalmic leaders discuss trends, new treatment options, and compliance issues.
BY STEPHEN DAILY, EXECUTIVE EDITOR, NEWS, BMC
As ophthalmic companies search for new and innovative ways to solve unmet needs, technological advances
are playing a direct role in the types of drugs and devices being developed and the way treatment regimens are
administered.
Although the focus ultimately remains on improving visual acuity, the ophthalmic industry has devoted more
resources in recent years to drugs and devices that achieve this objective in a faster, safer, and less invasive manner.
The FDA’s recent approval of small-incision lenticule extraction using the VisuMax laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec)
as well as microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices (iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent [Glaukos]
and Cypass Micro-Stent [Alcon]), corneal inlays (Kamra [AcuFocus] and Raindrop Near Vision Inlay [ReVision
Optics]), and corneal collagen cross-linking (KXL System; Avedro) has provided surgeons with effective new treatment options. In addition, drug candidates that employ new mechanisms of action, along with sustained-release
drug delivery tools, aim to address the problem of poor adherence to prescribed medical therapy.
As part of CRST’s series on the future of innovation in ophthalmology, we spoke with leaders of ophthalmic companies that represent different specialty areas to discuss which trends they expect to see in ophthalmology over
the next decade.
JAMES MAZZO
Global President of Ophthalmology
Carl Zeiss Meditec
JOSEPH BOORADY, OD
President and CEO
TearScience
CRST: When considering the future of
ophthalmic technology and innovation, where
do you believe the next decade will take
us? What trends will change the way patients are
treated?
James Mazzo: I think, anytime you look at a trend, you
have to look at what are the demographics. Obviously, you
68 CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGERY TODAY | NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2016
VINCE ANIDO JR, PHD
Chairman and CEO
Aerie Pharmaceuticals
MARK BAUM
Founder and CEO
Imprimis Pharmaceuticals
have an aging population, and you have the baby boomer
generation growing older as well. I look at categories such
as presbyopia, retina, glaucoma, and dry eye. Why? Unmet
needs are going to affect those populations, and companies are going to invest in them. (See Watch It Now for an
interview with Mr. Mazzo.)
The one I just started talking about in a previous session
(at the Ophthalmology Innovation Summit) is software
James Mazzo discusses how changing demographics
are going to affect the future of ophthalmic
technology and innovation.
bit.ly/crst1116_mazzo
development. As we start to look at the technologies—
and there are large pieces of capital equipment sitting
in a doctor’s office—the last thing [physicians] are going
to want to do is remove that capital. So, can we start to
develop software in which we can just update that piece
of capital equipment? I look at it from a category of demographics and unmet needs in treatment. I also look at how
do we take advantage of what we’ve already created and
make it better? That would be software.
Joseph Boorady, OD: Thinking about technology and
innovation in the next decade, I believe we will see continued advances in cataract and refractive surgery, including
better procedures and technology to improve outcomes
and visual performance. We will also see advancements
in MIGS devices for glaucoma and exciting innovations
in drugs and delivery systems for retina. But, I remain
most bullish on the advances in dry eye and meibomian
gland dysfunction, where TearScience has contributed.
All of the procedures and technologies just mentioned
require a healthy ocular surface to provide stable vision
and comfort from the common onset of [dry eye disease]
symptoms that accompany these procedures and conditions. A healthy tear film also provides an important barrier to infection. (See Watch It Now for an interview with
Dr. Boorady.)
Vince Anido Jr, PhD: We’ve had a tremendous amount
of investment going into ophthalmology over the last 7
to 10 years, and so it’s all now coming to fruition. You’ve
got new chemical entities, like ours, coming out in terms
of new treatments for glaucoma. We see other companies
“
Single drug bottles of eye
drops will go the way of the
proverbial horse and buggy.”
—Mark Baum
doing that as well. We’ve seen a huge amount of venture
investing going into devices, and whether they’re MIGS or
whether they’re drug delivery systems, they are all trying
to solve various different problems. I think all of those are
now just coming to fruition.
We see a couple of the MIGS [devices] out on the marketplace now. We expect a third [MIGS device] coming out
over the next few years. We expect new drugs to come out
over the next year or 2. All of that is just simply going to
continue fueling a lot of the R&D investment. Whether it’s
the venture guys that are doing it or whether it’s pharmaceutical companies that are doing it or some of the startups like us and Glaukos or Ophthotech, we’ll continue to
be able to get funding so that we can continue to look for
new solutions that we think will help the patients.
FORWARD THINKING
WATCH IT NOW
Mark Baum: I believe that, generally, single drug bottles
of eye drops will go the way of the proverbial horse and
buggy. New ways of delivering postsurgery prophylaxis
against inflammation and infection will dominate the cataract
surgery market. New chemistries of combinations of medicines that ease the burden of patient compliance will continue to gain momentum. New delivery modalities will also
proliferate outside of a front-of-the-eye practice. Companies
that have invested in new technologies will have the opportunity to thrive, and others that have not innovated or that
have fought to stop progress will be penalized.
CRST: Do you believe there’s an emphasis on
moving patients along sooner to a surgical
solution for diseases, or do you believe drug
regimens will remain a focus?
Mazzo: To address your question, let’s look at retina.
The only way a drug is going to get to the back of the eye
is through a device. I don’t know if it’s surgical, but I think a
drug delivery type of mechanism is going to be the future.
Also for dry eye, the way that you really get through the
tear film and get [the treatment] to where it needs to be is
going to be some type of a device.
NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2016 | CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGERY TODAY 69
• InnFocus MicroShunt (InnFocus
[Santen is acquiring InnFocus])
• Hydrus Microstent (Ivantis)
• iStent Inject (Glaukos)
• iStent Supra (Glaukos)
• Visco360 (Sight Sciences)a M I G S
• Xen (Allergan)
There is an increasing number
of treatment options in these
three areas.
ABiC • CyPass Micro-Stent (Alcon)
GATT • iStent Trabecular
Micro-Bypass Stent (Glaukos)
Kahook Dual Blade (New World Medical)
Trab360 (Sight Sciences) • Trabectome (NeoMedix)
E A SE
Kamra (AcuFocus) • Raindrop
Near Vision Inlay (ReVision Optics)
AY S
DR Y E Y E
D IS
Restasis
(cyclosporine ophthalmic
emulsion 0.05%; Allergan)
Xiidra (lifitegrast;
ophthalmic solution 5%;
Shire)
NL
FORWARD THINKING
THE GROWTH OF COMPETITION
CORNEAL
I
• Presbia Flexivue
Microlens (Presbia)
KEY
Not yet FDA approved.
70 CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGERY TODAY | NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2016
Abbreviations: MIGS, microinvasive glaucoma surgery; ABiC, ab interno
canaloplasty; GATT, gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy.
Editor’s note: The categorization of subconjunctival procedures (eg, InnFocus
MicroShunt and Xen) as MIGS is in flux.
a For glaucoma indication.
It’s going to be a combination of both pharmaceutical
and devices. That’s why I’m pleased at Zeiss; we obviously
are leaders in devices, so we can look at our devices to be
complementary to the drugs. Then, of course, before you
get to any treatment, you’ve got to diagnose it. I would
say you should be careful of trying to treat before you
diagnose, as you could mistreat and that’s where you have
escalating costs and unhappy patients. Let’s get the diagnostic machines ready and then be ready to treat.
Boorady: There are certainly elements of disease that
are best served by surgical procedures and devices. In arterial disease, drug agents are essential, but when blockage is
present, a stent is needed. If you were to rely on drugs first,
you might lose the patient. I do think there are similarities
with many ophthalmic conditions, where intervening with
devices or surgery earlier in the disease process should be
an emphasis. Clinicians have newer technologies that can
safely get directly to the root of the problem while also
addressing systemic processes and downstream sequelae
with appropriate drugs.
The LipiFlow [TearScience] is a great example.
[Meibomian gland dysfunction] was a disease that, for
decades, was treated with heat and massage from the
outside of the lid, requiring potentially unsafe amounts
of pressure on the globe with only [a] marginal, fleeting
effect. Modern engineering was tapped to effectively heat
the inner lid directly adjacent to the glands. LipiFlow then
applies gentle pressure simultaneously to express blockage
and potentially necrotic tissue with a phased peristaltic
pressure profile while protecting the delicate structures of
the cornea, globe, and lid. The combination of ingenious
patented concepts, new materials, and classic lens design
safely removes obstruction by a well-understood mechanism of action.
LipiFlow has now been shown to provide patients with
a year of improvement from a single 12-minute procedure
in a large, randomized multicenter trial.1 It solves an issue
in need of a mechanical solution and in turn maximizes
[the] effectiveness of drugs and supplements thereafter.
WATCH IT NOW
Joseph Boorady, OD, shares why he is bullish on the
future of dry eye and meibomian gland dysfunction
technologies.
FORWARD THINKING
“
You’re not going to be able
to get rid of drugs just
because you’ve got a surgical
intervention.”
—Vince Anido Jr, PhD
bit.ly/crst1116_boorady
With the advent of MIPS [Merit-Based Incentive Payment
System] and other quality metrics, better patient outcomes
earlier in disease processes will be a necessity. This will
especially be the case with self-pay procedures where physicians provide effective and lasting treatments and control
pricing—procedures that will provide great outcomes
while at the same time contribute to practice growth.
Anido: If you focus only on where the venture investing
is going, you’d think, “Oh my God, everything is going to
some sort of a surgical solution. Right?” There’s an awful lot
of information about the MIGS and drug delivery systems.
The facts are that, while all those are quite effective, we’ve
never seen a therapeutic market go to zero as a result of
surgical intervention. If you take a look at the cardiology
space and things like that, certainly, the pharmaceutical
component of it continued to move forward. We don’t
think that it’s going to have a negative impact on ophthalmic pharmaceutical products. In fact, all of these drugs,
while they do something positive for the patient, they
don’t really treat the underlying disease. For example, one
we know well in glaucoma, a lot of these [devices] don’t
treat the fibrosis and the trabecular meshwork, so you’re
not going to be able to get rid of drugs just because you’ve
got a surgical intervention. (See Watch It Now for an interview with Dr. Anido.)
Baum: Ophthalmologists will always make the best call
for their patients based on the respective individual needs
of the patient. More and more care will be delivered by
NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2016 | CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGERY TODAY 71
FORWARD THINKING
WATCH IT NOW
Vince Anido Jr, PhD, explains why it is necessary
for the therapeutic market to complement surgical
intervention.
bit.ly/crst1116_andio
ophthalmologists in their office—whether it is a surgical
intervention or the administration of a drug regimen. My
hope is that power is restored to the ophthalmologist as
a “giver of care” and that middle parties lose power over
decisions connected to the care of patients.
CRST: In what ways are companies focusing on
decades-old patient compliance issues?
Mazzo: I agree that patient compliance has been,
and will continue to be, a significant issue when treating
patients with chronic diseases. To help, our effort at Zeiss
is to make it easier for clinicians to diagnose and manage patients and, equally important, to aid clinicians in
patient[s’] education about their disease and its progression. Diagnostic images and exam-to-exam changes can be
used to consult with patients about their condition and
need for treatment and/or therapy. Simple, but impactful,
images as well as careful counseling holds one of the keys
to improving patient compliance.
Boorady: We’re seeing innovation to solve for patient
compliance in several areas. There are intraoperative injections and new drug and therapy delivery devices in the
works to overcome the shortcomings of patient noncompliance. TearScience is highly focused on compliance issues.
For over 100 years, the efficacy limitations inherent with
warm compresses are compounded by horrific compliance.
Compliance was right behind efficacy as the motivation for
the development of LipiFlow. After years of experimenting
72 CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGERY TODAY | NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2016
“
Compliance ... will continue
to be a significant issue when
treating patients with chronic
diseases.”
—James Mazzo
with multiple heat and energy sources to safely remove
meibomian gland obstruction, including [infrared, radio
frequency,] ultrasound, heat paddles, steam, and laser, to
name a few, we realized that just heating the meibomian
glands did not remove obstruction, and in fact, within
seconds after the heat source was removed, the blockage
recongeal[ed]. It was only with inner lid heat and simultaneous expression that we achieved significant long-term
results and thereby eliminate[d] compliance challenges.
Anido: All of us worry about compliance, and so from a
drug perspective, we try to get everything down to a oncea-day product. We think that that’s where you have the
highest compliance. For example, we have a combination of
our drug Rhopressa (netarsudil) with latanoprost, both of
those once a day, we call Roclatan (netarsudil-latanoprost),
because then we think you’ll get pretty good compliance
when you have two drugs in one bottle and the patient
doesn’t have to have that second drop. Certainly, we see
a lot of drug delivery systems that are out there, whether
they’re surface delivery systems like the punctal plugs or the
rings or the ones that are injected or inserted, that we think
will enhance compliance to some degree.
At the end of the day, if you could focus it only on once
a day, or if you can bypass that and put it in the surgeon’s
hands to be able to do it intracamerally or to the back
of the eye—a solution with a long-acting device of some
sort—we think all that will enhance the compliance.
Baum: Our mission is 100% committed to high-quality
innovation but also access and affordability. We fulfill our
mission by combining medicines into new combination
topical and injectable formulations. The upshot for the
patient is that we relieve them and their physician of compliance challenges that we all know are pervasive. We also
do this while saving patients and the government a lot of
money. It’s a true win-win for everyone. n
1. Blackie CA, Coleman CA, Holland EJ. The sustained effect (12 months) of a single-dose vectored thermal pulsation
procedure for meibomian gland dysfunction and evaporative dry eye [published online ahead of print July 26, 2016].
Clin Ophthalmol. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S109663.
It may be time to expand our thinking on MGD detection and treatment.
BY PREEYA K. GUPTA, MD
In recent years, it has been increasingly
recognized that meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) may be the leading cause of dry
eye disease.1 Meibomian gland obstruction
and reduced meibum production play a central role in destabilizing the tear film, resulting in symptoms of eye dryness, irritation,
inflammation, and ocular surface disease.2
Yet MGD remains an underdiagnosed entity. In part, this
is because not all cases of MGD can be identified based on
morphologic changes.3 Recognizing more subtle cases sometimes requires an understanding of the functionality of the
glands themselves.4
Studies have reported a wide range of MGD prevalence,
from as low as 3.5% to as high as 70%.5-10 Because these studies used different definitions and approaches to identifying
MGD prevalence, there is not a clear picture of how many
patients might have MGD requiring treatment. However, a
number of ophthalmic, systemic, and therapeutic risk factors
have been identified.
One intriguing question that has arisen regarding MGD
risk factors is whether the increased use of digital devices is
a causative factor. This may be one of the reasons behind an
apparent epidemiologic shift in the characteristic types of
patients affected by MGD, with younger patients now more
likely to experience its effects.
The subtle morphology in many cases of MGD, the apparent increase in its prevalence, and the shifting demographics
of the disease all argue for a more aggressive approach to
treatment. My rationale for this statement is set forth in the
remainder of this article.
Greater awareness of MGD is undoubtedly needed. Its
association with dry eye disease has been well documented, as
noted.1 Beyond eye dryness, however, MGD is also an important cause of visual symptoms in its own right, including eyelid
irritation, redness, swelling, and other symptoms.
One consequence of better MGD diagnostics is a greater
realization of MGD prevalence in populations we previously
thought were not much affected. This, coupled with an
increase in the use of digital devices, is causing a shift in the
demographic profile of the typical MGD patient. The classical thinking is that an elderly patient with a history of recent
ocular surgery might be the most likely to experience MGD. In
my practice, however, men and women in their 30s and 40s are
now the most likely to have MGD. The role of digital devices in
this shift has not been clearly or definitively elucidated, but it is
my sense that staring at a digital device reduces the blink rate,
which in turn yields less stimulation of secretion by the meibomian glands, leading over time to development of MGD.
The changing demographics of MGD presents a clinical
challenge. Because the thinking has been to look for signs
and symptoms in older individuals, the disease may be
underreported and underdiagnosed among those outside
the classic patient profile. The danger here is that, because
MGD is progressive and chronic, failure to recognize it and
intervene early may lead to worse outcomes.
In addition, because MGD can lead to instability in the
tear film, and because the tear film is an important refracting surface, undetected MGD can affect the accuracy of
keratometry and biometry readings. When MGD is missed,
therefore, it may lead to suboptimal refractive outcomes
after refractive or cataract surgery.
CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS
One obvious reason for what seems like a recent rise in
MGD prevalence may be the availability of better diagnostics
and better treatments. Our enhanced ability to detect MGD
allows us to intervene early in its course. Access to better
diagnostics has also led to increased awareness of MGD in
the eye care community, with the result that more patients
are being diagnosed and treated.
SCREENING AND ADVANCED DIAGNOSTICS
A questionnaire can be a useful adjunct to quickly screen
and identify patients in need of additional evaluation for
MGD. Expanding the pool of patients who fill out the Ocular
Surface Disease Index or Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye
Dryness questionnaires could help to identify unknown
MGD in nonclassic patients, such as young patients and
those with early symptoms of MGD.
OSD BACK TO BASICS
RATIONALE FOR AGGRESSIVE
MANAGEMENT OF MGD
OCTOBER 2016 | ADVANCED OCULAR CARE 37
OSD BACK TO BASICS
“
I have a pretty low barrier to
suggest additional workup for
MGD if questionnaire responses
are suggestive of disease.
Once MGD is identified, additional clinical tools can
help to build the patient’s profile. I have a pretty low barrier to suggest additional workup for MGD if questionnaire
responses are suggestive of disease. To that end, meibography with Dynamic Meibomian Imaging on the LipiView II
(TearScience) has become an indispensible tool for diagnosis
and patient education. The old adage that a picture is worth
1,000 words is definitely true. Imaging also helps to assess the
severity of the MGD. Both of these factors can be important
for educating young or seemingly asymptomatic patients
that they have gland atrophy that must be treated. This is
especially important if there is a disconnect between the
patient’s signs and symptoms, which is often the case with
dry eye disease, whatever the cause.
Meibography is performed at baseline assessment. Other
tests may be performed during an initial encounter and
then repeated over time to provide an index of the effectiveness of treatment. These include lipid layer analysis with
the LipiView II, tear osmolarity testing (TearLab), and the
InflammaDry point-of-care test (Rapid Pathogen Screening).
WATCH IT NOW
Preeya K. Gupta, MD, speaks with Mark Kontos, MD, and
Brandon Ayres, MD, about the challenges associated
with ocular surface disease.
There is often a lag time between when treatment is started
and when patients start to feel relief from their symptoms,
so these tests can help to reassure patients that treatment is
in fact working.
THOUGHTS ON TREATMENT
Once MGD has been detected and quantified, our final
goal is to provide the patient with a treatment approach
that has been shown to be safe and effective. The LipiFlow
Thermal Pulsation Device (TearScience) has been shown in
multiple peer-reviewed reports and multicenter clinical trials
to effectively clear obstruction in the meibomian glands.11
Removing the obstruction and returning the gland to normal function is key to treating the underlying problem and
relieving symptoms.
There can be a lag time between initiation of treatment
with thermal pulsation and the consequent normalization
of the tear film (in my experience, between 2 and 4 months).
Therefore, it is prudent to set expectations for patients so
that they can be assured the treatment needs time to work.
The approach to MGD must be individualized for each
patient. As with aqueous deficient dry eye disease, different
factors on different days may have different effects on the
health of the ocular surface in the patient with MGD. There
is no one-size-fits-all strategy to address MGD, although it is
safe to say that an aggressive approach to identifying it early
and intervening appropriately is likely to achieve the outcomes our patients desire. n
1. Nichols KK, Foulks GN, Bron AJ, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: executive summary.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(4):1922-1929.
2. Nelson JD, Shimazaki J, Benitez-del-Castillo JM, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction:
report of the definition and classification subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(4):1930-1937.
3. Foulks GN, Bron AJ. Meibomian gland dysfunction: a clinical scheme for description, diagnosis, classification, and
grading. Ocul Surf. 2003;1(3):107-126.
4. Blackie CA, Korb DR, Knop E, et al. Nonobvious obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea. 2010;29(12):13331245.
5. Schein OD, Munoz B, Tielsch JM, Bandeen-Roche K, West S. Prevalence of dry eye among the elderly. Am J Ophthalmol.
1997;124:723-728.
6. Lekhanont K, Rojanaporn D, Chuck RS, Vongthongsri A. Prevalence of dry eye in Bangkok, Thailand. Cornea.
2006;25:1162-1167.
7. Lin PY, Tsai SY, Cheng CY, et al. Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: The Shihpai Eye
Study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1096-1101.
8. Uchino M, Dogru M, Yagi Y. The features of dry eye disease in a Japanese elderly population. Optom Vis Sci.
2006;83:797-802.
9. Jie Y, Xu L, Wu YY, Jonas JB. Prevalence of dry eye among adult Chinese in the Beijing Eye Study. Eye (Lond).
2009;23:688-693.
10. McCarty CA, Bansal AK, Livingston PM, et al. The epidemiology of dry eye in Melbourne, Australia. Ophthalmology.
1998;105:1114-1119.
11. Blackie CA, Carlson AN, Korb DR. Treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction and dry eye symptoms with a singledose vectored thermal pulsation: a review. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26(4):306-313.
Preeya K. Gupta, MD
Assistant professor of ophthalmology, division of cornea and
refractive surgery, Duke University Eye Center
n Clinical director, Duke Eye Center
n (919) 660-5071; [email protected]
n Financial disclosure: consultant to Allergan, Biotissue, Shire, and
TearScience
n
http://bit.ly/gupta1016
38 ADVANCED OCULAR CARE | OCTOBER 2016
BLOG: A year of relief from a single LipiFlow treatment
By Darrell White, MD
October 5, 2016
While it may not yet be a golden era in the treatment of meibomian gland disease and associated
evaporative dry eye disease, I don’t think anyone would contest that we have exited the Dark Ages.
Much of this can be attributed to early work done by Dr. Donald Korb in the mid-00s and subsequent
insights we have from Caroline Blackie and her group within TearScience. Add this to what we know
about re-esterified fish oil and MGD, and we now have some ammunition to bring to the battle.
There have been more actionable studies published in the first 9 months of 2016 in the DED world than
in the last 9 years total. The latest comes from Dr. Blackie along with Ed Holland, and it looked at the
effect of a single vectored thermal pulsation — LipiFlow — on meibomian gland function and patient
symptoms compared with traditional warm compresses and lid hygiene. Eighty-six percent of treated
patients had a 2.5 times improvement in gland function and a greater than 50% decrease in DED
symptoms. An early diagnosis of disease was associated with a greater degree of treatment effect.
What does this mean in the trenches of our DED battle? LipiFlow works. Not only that, but there are
now data that show a prolonged effect of a single treatment for an entire year in an overwhelming
majority of patients. The subtler finding of an early diagnosis effect is compelling as well. I think this
study gives us ample reason to aggressively look for MGD in even the mildest of cases of DED and to
then give serious consideration to more aggressive treatment.
Hat tip to Drs. Blackie and Holland for putting to rest the notion that LipiFlow is just an expensive warm
compress. This is a real treatment for a real disease that provides a real, lasting benefit for patients with
DED symptoms associated with MGD. Our experience at SkyVision bears this out.
http://www.healio.com/ophthalmology/cornea-external-disease/news/blogs/%7B9c85fa2c-a103-4c2c8715-9b16b5efe932%7D/darrell-e-white-md/blog-a-year-of-relief-from-a-single-lipiflow-treatment
MEETING NEWS COVERAGE
TearScience: Meibomian imager well received
September 29, 2016
LAS VEGAS – The TearScience LipiScan, which was launched in May, has been well received among eye
care providers, according to company executives. They also shared recent study results with Primary
Care Optometry News here at Vision Expo West.
According to TearScience President and CEO Joseph Boorady, OD, clinical study results involving 404
eyes of 200 patients showed that a single treatment with the LipiFlow can sustain improvement in
meibomian gland function and reduction in dry eye symptoms over 12 months.
“The whole group had a 50% reduction in symptoms and tripled the gland scores, sustained over 12
months,” he told PCON.
The earlier the patients were treated in the disease, the better the outcomes, Brian Regan, TearScience
vice president of marketing and market development, added.
The LipiFlow measures tear film and blink quality and provides dynamic meibomian imaging. The
recently released LipiScan provides high-definition meibomian imaging. – by Nancy Hemphill, ELS, FAAO
http://www.healio.com/optometry/business-of-optometry/news/online/%7B07a73f27-e263-4652b8b8-8e167ecf978f%7D/tearscience-meibomian-imager-well-received
12/13/2016
Reviews Supplements Review of Cornea & Contact Lenses September 2016
http://bt.e­ditionsbyfry.com/publication/index.php?i=334997&m=&l=&p=1&pre=&ver=html5#{"page":4,"issue_id":334997}
2/5
COVER FOCUS
THE VICIOUS CYCLE OF
MGD AND GLAUCOMA
Meibomian gland dysfunction can have an impact on the effectiveness of glaucoma
treatment, and glaucoma therapy can affect the meibomian glands.
BY ROBERT J. NOECKER, MD, MBA
Glaucoma is a serious condition that warrants close attention and careful management to avoid progression and vision loss.
But failure to account for the health of
the rest of the eye while attending to glaucoma could be detrimental to the patient’s
outcome. In particular, the health of the
glaucoma patient’s ocular surface can have
implications not only for that patient’s vision, but also for
the efficacy of the glaucoma treatment you prescribe.
Glaucoma becomes more prevalent with age, and so
does meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).1,2 Naturally,
there is crossover of the patient populations affected by
these conditions, and many glaucoma patients are affected
to some degree by ocular surface compromise.3,4
This comorbidity is increasingly being recognized
because of our improving diagnostic acumen with ocular
surface issues. MGD was likely always an issue among glaucoma patients, but improved diagnostics and increased
understanding of dry eye disease and its implications for
ocular health have expanded the recognition of MGD as
an important entity to consider in this population. In this
comorbid relationship, MGD can affect the treatment of
glaucoma, and the treatment of glaucoma can affect any
MGD that may be present.
MGD AND GLAUCOMA TREATMENT
Questions about ocular surface health in respect to
glaucoma tend to concern how the ingredients in the
topical medication bottle may be harmful to the ocular surface. Less well appreciated may be that tear film
insufficiency may affect the efficacy of glaucoma medications—especially if the ocular surface disorder is significant
enough to compromise the patient’s adherence to the
dosing schedule.
Many medications used in glaucoma therapy contain
preservatives. The one that is most concerning for the
ocular surface and MGD is benzalkonium chloride (BAK).
On the positive side, BAK can disrupt the ocular surface
42 ADVANCED OCULAR CARE | SEPTEMBER 2016
epithelium and potentially improve the penetration of the
active ingredient.5,6 However, BAK can also have cytotoxic
effects,4 and in an eye with a compromised tear film, the
irritating nature of BAK can have deleterious effects on
comfort and vision.7,8
In some cases, the active ingredient itself, rather than
the preservative, can be the irritating element. One of the
side effects of the prostaglandin class of glaucoma drugs
is burning upon instillation.9 This may be attributable to a
vasodilatory effect of the drug or it may be secondary to an
undiagnosed ocular surface insufficiency. Regardless of the
mechanism for this side effect, patients take these topical
therapies chronically, and their built-up cumulative effect
over the course of decades will almost assuredly have an
effect on the health of the ocular surface.
Over time, mild MGD is likely to be exacerbated into
more severe forms by glaucoma treatment, the net effect
being that eye drops that are already irritating become
more so. In glaucoma, where patients’ compliance is
already a complicated issue, any additional reason for
patients to avoid their drops is a concern.
IMPROVED DIAGNOSTICS
Luckily, in recent years our ability to detect even mild
forms of MGD has vastly improved. In addition, a wealth of
treatment options for both MGD and glaucoma provides
adequate options to design interventions that treat glaucoma while having the least possible effect on the ocular
surface.
In our clinic, where technicians do most of the workup
before the specialist’s interaction with patients, we have
incorporated a suite of useful but easy-to-integrate
screening and testing protocols. The Tear Osmolarity
Test (TearLab) is an important component of ocular surface management, as it provides a quantitative index for
tear film irregularity and instability. If indicated, we can
also perform analysis with the LipiView II Ocular Surface
Interferometer (TearScience) to detect MGD. During
the eye care provider’s examination, a careful slit-lamp
DO NOT FORGET THE GLAUCOMA
Among the reasons to address MGD in glaucoma
patients is that a compromised ocular surface may impair
the ability of glaucoma medications to penetrate into the
eye. Topical formulations are engineered to penetrate the
ocular surface of a healthy human eye with osmolarity
of about 290 to 300 mOsm/L. Hyperosmolarity, if present, could yield unknown effects in a drug’s ability to pass
through the corneal surface. Thus, treating MGD may be
good for the patient’s glaucoma as well.
With regard to adjusting glaucoma treatment in the
presence of MGD, there are basically two approaches: to
take away factors that may be offending the ocular surface, or to add factors to make the ocular environment
better. Patients may benefit from a combination of both.
Glaucoma patients should be counseled on good ocular
ergonomics when using a computer (looking down instead
of straight on, looking away occasionally to blink and
refresh the eye). They should be made conscious of the
potential for fans and forced air to dry the eye. There may
be other exacerbating factors that can be removed as well,
such as systemic medications or the use of makeup around
the eye.
Generic formulations of glaucoma medications all contain BAK, so an in-class switch to a preservative-free or
non-BAK option may be in the patient’s best interest. A
fixed-combination medication may be an option if prostaglandin use is undesirable due to tolerability issues or if an
additional therapy is needed.
For patients with severe MGD, topical glaucoma therapy
may not even be an option, especially if the ocular surface issue is limiting the efficacy of the drops. However,
these patients’ glaucoma definitely must be addressed.
To achieve intraocular pressure lowering in patients who
cannot tolerate topical medications, another intervention
strategy may be needed. Selective laser trabeculoplasty
with the Selecta II laser (Lumenis) is a consideration, and
surgery may be a consideration based on the particulars of
the patient. At the very least, if the MGD is interfering with
glaucoma therapy, this is a rationale for escalating therapy
to a more aggressive approach.
COVER FOCUS
examination is performed, during which the meibomian
glands are expressed to gauge the quality of the meibum.
Thin and olive oil-like expression indicates healthy secretion, whereas thick and toothpaste-like suggests MGD.
We also listen attentively to patients’ recounting of their
symptoms. A report of blurry vision, for instance, will lead
us to ask when it occurs. If it occurs around the time of
instillation of a glaucoma medication, this can indicate a
potential issue with the drop or an irregular tear film. If it
occurs at other times of the day, MGD may be the more
likely cause. Typical signs of MGD such as redness and irritation on the eyelids are also of interest.
Dynamic Meibomian Imaging (TearScience) can also
serve a useful role in educating patients about the health
of their ocular surface. Serial meibography with this device
can occasionally unveil whether there have been changes
to the meibomian gland structure as a result of treatment.
In addition, repeated imaging demonstrates to patients
that the treatment is having an effect, even if their symptoms are not yet alleviated. The benefit of motivating
patients to stay on track with their MGD therapy should
not be underestimated. Patients need to take an active role
in MGD management to achieve greater success.
CONCLUSION
Glaucoma specialists are trained to treat this chronic
medical condition aggressively and completely. Getting the
intraocular pressure to a safe level is of utmost importance
to slow and prevent progression. And yet our patients
may have other ocular issues to consider, and those issues
may be detrimental to quality of life in addition to being
a hindrance to treatment. Coexisting ocular surface disease warrants consideration when a glaucoma treatment
plan is devised because the ocular surface issue deserves
treatment in its own right. Improving the ocular surface
by treating MGD does more than balance and improve
the effectiveness of the glaucoma intervention; it may also
improve patients’ well-being if it allows them to enjoy the
benefits of good vision without compromise. n
1. Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol.
2000;118:9:1264-1268.
2. Friedman DS, Wolfs RC, O’Colmain BJ, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United
States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:4:532-538.
3. Fechtner R, Budenz, D, Godfrey D. Prevalence of ocular surface disease symptoms in glaucoma patients on IOPlowering medications. Poster presented at: The 18th Annual Meeting of the American Glaucoma Society; March 8,
2006; Washington, DC.
4. Noecker R. Effects of common ophthalmic preservatives on ocular health. Adv Ther. 2001;18(5):205-215.
5. Majumdar S, Hippalgaonkar K, Repka MA. Effect of chitosan, benzalkonium chloride and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on permeation of acyclovir across isolated rabbit cornea. Int J Pharm.2008;348(1–2):175–178.
6. Keller N, Moore D, Carper D, Longwell A. Increased corneal permeability induced by the dual effects of transient
tear film acidification and exposure to benzalkonium chloride. Exp Eye Res. 1980;30(2):203–210.
7. Noecker RJ, Herrygers LA, Anwaruddin R. Corneal and conjunctival changes caused by commonly used glaucoma
medications. Cornea. 2004;23(5):490-496.
8. Kahook MY, Noecker RJ. Comparison of corneal and conjunctival changes after dosing of travoprost preserved with
Sofzia, latanoprost with 0.02% benzalkonium chloride, and preservative-free artificial tears. Cornea. 2008;27(3):339343.
9. Prum BE, Rosenberg LF, Gedde SJ, et al. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern Guidelines.
Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1):P41-P111.
Robert J. Noecker, MD, MBA
In practice with the Ophthalmic Consultants of Connecticut
in Fairfield, Connecticut
n Assistant clinical professor, Yale University School of Medicine,
New Haven, Connecticut
n Clinical professor of surgery, Netter School of Medicine,
Quinnipiac University, North Haven, Connecticut
n [email protected]
n Financial disclosure: consultant to Tear Science
n
SEPTEMBER 2016 | ADVANCED OCULAR CARE 43
A Single LipiFlow Treatment Demonstrates Sustained Improvement in Gland
Function and Symptoms in Patients with MGD and Dry Eye
TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2016
TearScience announced the publication of a seminal prospective, multicenter clinical trial showing that a
single LipiFlow treatment can deliver sustained mean improvement in meibomian gland function and
dry eye symptoms through 12 months. The study also concluded that early LipiFlow intervention for
meibomian gland dysfunction is associated with improved treatment outcomes, according to a company
news release.
The mean improvement of meibomian gland function and dry eye symptoms have been frequently
studied, documented and reviewed.2 What is novel about this study is that the effect of a single LipiFlow
treatment was monitored and, on average, sustained through the 12-month study period.
At 12 months, 86% of patients had received only a single LipiFlow treatment and did not require
additional prescription therapy for dry eye symptoms. "The sustained results shown in this study are
evidence that LipiFlow's inner-lid heat with combined vectored pulsation is uniquely effective. LipiFlow
provides long-term improvement in meibomian gland function and dry eye symptoms. Whether alone or
complemented with other prescription interventions, LipiFlow optimizes outcomes for dry eye
sufferers," Joseph Boorady, CEO of TearScience, said in the news release.
"Because MGD is chronic and progressive, it has long been suspected that early intervention is likely to
yield increased benefits," Edward J. Holland, MD, a study investigator and author of the publication, said
in the news release. "Our study findings strongly suggest that screening for MGD and treating underlying
gland dysfunction is an appropriate protocol for all patients, even in the absence of dry eye symptoms."
All device-related adverse events were anticipated, transient, nonserious ocular events that resolved
without sequelae. The type and rate of nonserious and transient adverse events related to the LipiFlow
System in the study were consistent with prior studies.
The study, "The sustained effect (12 months) of a single-dose vectored thermal pulsation procedure for
meibomian gland dysfunction and evaporative dry eye," was published in Clinical Ophthalmology.1
http://eyewiretoday.com/2016/08/23/a-single-lipiflow-treatment-demonstrates-sustainedimprovement-in-gland-function-and-symptoms-in-patients-with-mgd-and-dry-eye
12/13/2016
Ophthalmology Management
Article Date: 8/1/2016
Changing Dry Eye Treatment
Old standbys still help, but the latest dry eye therapies are life­
changing
Dr. Donaldson: Just as we’ve witnessed the development of new diagnostic technologies for dry eye,
we’ve also seen new medications and therapies that allow us to bring even difficult cases under control
so patients can lead better lives. Some therapies are in use already, and many more are in the pipeline.
From the Dependable to the Exciting
Dr. Donaldson: If MMP­9 testing is positive, most of my patients begin treatment with a combination of
cyclosporine (Restasis, Allergan) and loteprednol (Lotemax, Bausch + Lomb). I’m instituting cyclosporine
much earlier than I did a few years ago in an effort to decrease inflammation before it causes long­term
tissue damage on the ocular surface. The goal is to break the cycle of inflammation and worsening dry
eye, so treating preemptively instead of telling everyone to use artificial tears until late in the disease
course is a more effective approach.
Lifitegrast (Xiidra, Shire) was approved in July for the treatment of signs and symptoms of dry eye
disease in adults.
We also have many exciting treatments in the pipeline for dry eye, one of which is the Oculeve
Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator (Allergan), which is a non­invasive nasal device designed to increase
tear production in patients with dry eye disease.
There are at least 10 other drugs in the pipeline for dry eye. It’s very exciting to follow their progress and
envision all of the new options for our patients in the future. We’ll have more help for patients who have
been struggling for a long time. While we’re making big strides in understanding and diagnosing dry eye,
our arsenal of treatments is moving ahead at a swift pace as well.
Prokera Amniotic Membranes
Dr. Donaldson: We have many new treatment modalities. One is the use of amniotic membranes such
as Prokera (Bio­Tissue). How is it working for your patients?
Dr. McDonald: On an average day, I put in two to four Prokera amniotic membranes. It’s for desperate
dry eye patients, and it works beautifully.
http://www.ophthalmologymanagement.com/printarticle.aspx?articleID=114620
1/3
12/13/2016
Ophthalmology Management
Prokera is a ring of polymethyl methacrylate with amniotic membrane suspended across the center. You
insert it and leave it on the eye for 5 to 7 days. Usually we do one eye at a time. I’ve found that most
patients get weeks or months of relief. Once in a while, I get a patient who is very dry with 4+ filaments,
and I have to put in the amniotic membranes again and again — two or three sets in a row — to make
the patient feel comfortable for a few months.
I was taught that I should splint the lid with tape when using Prokera, but I’ve never had to tape any of
my patients, and it stays in. Patients usually prefer to forgo the tape.
Dr. Donaldson: I tape everybody. I joke with my patients that it makes quite a fashion statement. I
basically use a half­width piece of plastic medical tape that fits lengthwise over the upper lid to create a
tape tarsorrhaphy. It’s actually minimally noticeable and reasonably acceptable aesthetically. This limits
upper lid excursion so that the patient blinks halfway and there is less rubbing over the surface of the
Prokera ring. The thinner Prokera Slim has been a huge advance in comfort, as well. I really haven’t had
a patient complain of discomfort with Prokera since I’ve been using the Prokera Slim in combination with
a tape tarsorraphy.
Dr. McDonald: Bio­Tissue just came out with the Prokera Slim Clear. It has a 6­mm hole in the center,
over the visual axis. It is designed so that the eye can see fairly normally. There is a little less amniotic
membrane on the surface of the eye, but it is much more tolerable — especially for people who are trying
to work. I’m still doing one at a time with the new design, but I’m planning to see if it’s possible to send
people to work with two of the Prokera Slim Clears in place.
LipiFlow
Dr. Donaldson: In our clinic, we’ve had great results with LipiFlow (TearScience), which uses thermal
pulsation with inner­lid technology. It is the only FDA­cleared device for MGD that has been shown to
restore gland function. LipiFlow has been extensively reviewed in 5 multi­centered studies and 31 peer
reviewed reports.
Dr. McDonald: I started to use BlephEx (RySurg) right before performing a LipiFlow treatment; that
really helps express all of the altered meibum. This “one­two punch” works well because once we’ve used
the BlephEx to remove that thin fibrovascular membrane — an almost invisible layer that’s closing off
the meibomian gland orifices — we’re able to get even better results from LipiFlow.
Dr. Epitropoulos: Conventional options, such as warm compresses and artificial tears, are very good
supplemental treatments, but they aren’t therapeutic because they don’t address meibomian gland
obstruction. Once I’ve addressed the meibomian glands using LipiFlow, not only does the patient get
relief from dry eye, but supplemental treatments have a better chance of working as well.
LipiFlow is becoming one of the treatments of choice when there is evidence of meibomian gland
dysfunction. Data show that if we can get to these glands early, they will respond better than if we wait
until the glands are atrophied and nonfunctional.
In FDA clinical trials, an overall improvement in dry eye symptoms was reported in 76% of patients in
the Lipiflow group.1 Subsequent clinical trials have shown that a single LipiFlow treatment is capable of
delivering a sustained improvement in gland function and reduction in dry eye symptoms for up to 12
months in controlled studies and up to 36 months in uncontrolled studies.2
I also tell patients that about 20% don’t notice any improvement in their symptoms, but if we can
address the meibomian gland obstruction, I think we’re still helping to prevent progressive damage.
Dr. McDonald: To all my patients, I say, “It’s a slow miracle. It does work. You will get a little bit better
every day, but it takes 6 months to reach maximum benefit; you will hold the benefit for an average of a
year, with a range of 6 to 36 months (though almost everyone gets at least a year of benefit).” I have
them come back 3 months after LipiFlow, and inevitably we see a better tear osmolarity score and a
negative MMP­9 test. That concrete evidence shows patients that it was worth them spending out of
pocket for a procedure not covered by their insurance. It really enhances their perceived value of the
treatment. And by the time they come back 6 months after the treatment, they feel the improvement.
Intense Pulsed Light Therapy
Dr. Donaldson: Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) therapy is a newer treatment for dry eye. We’ve adapted it
from dermatologists, who noticed that dry eye sometimes improved after rosacea patients were treated
with IPL. What has been your experience with IPL?
http://www.ophthalmologymanagement.com/printarticle.aspx?articleID=114620
2/3
12/13/2016
Ophthalmology Management
Dr. Matossian: I have been using IPL for many years. It works very well. We put a bib on our patients
that we call “the lobster bib,” then we apply lidocaine gel across the cheeks. Next, I spread a copious
layer of ultrasound gel from ear to ear and cover the patient’s eyes with protective goggles. Using a
handheld device, I proceed with the IPL from tragus to tragus to close off the abnormal telangiectatic
blood vessels that are leaking pro­inflammatory mediators and strangling the meibomian glands. By
killing those off, we improve the health of the meibomian glands.
Immediately after treatment, I manually express the meibum, moving from the lateral area of the lower
lid to the inner canthus. With a cotton­tipped applicator and my thumb, I work all the meibomian glands;
I can see what’s coming out. I comment on the color, the consistency, and the amount. Over time,
qualitative improvement of the meibum is clearly visible.
Dr. Donaldson: How many treatments do you typically need to achieve a good response?
Dr. Matossian: I start with a series of four single treatments every 4 to 5 weeks. Thereafter, it’s one
treatment about every 6 months for maintenance. IPL is an out­of­pocket procedure.
Dr. Donaldson: It sounds like it works very well. It’s rewarding to treat people who have been suffering
without relief, sometimes for years.
Other Treatment Approaches
Dr. Donaldson: Traditional treatments, such as warm compresses and artificial tears, can still be used
to improve signs and symptoms.
In my practice, we also use MiBoFlo ThermoFlo (MiBo Medical Group) as an adjunct to manual expression
for temporary relief of MGD symptoms.
Better Therapies = Happier Patients
Dr. Donaldson: It’s exciting to think of all the therapies we’re employing for dry eye patients. This
wasn’t happening a decade ago. All of these therapies are making a profound difference. One of my
patients made a video about how our Ocular Surface Center made life so much more comfortable for
him. After 15 years of suffering with dry eye, finally, in our practice, the ocular surface staff listened and
understood. These therapies are helping people with a frustrating chronic disease they previously
thought they’d have to struggle with for life. ■
References
1. Lane SS, DuBiner HB, Epstein RJ, et al. A new system, the LipiFlow, for the treatment of meibomian
gland dysfunction. Cornea 2012;31:396­404.
2. Blackie CA, Carlson AN, Korb DR. Treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction and dry eye symptoms
with a single­dose vectored thermal pulsation: a review. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2015;26:306­313.
Ophthalmology Management, Volume: 20 , Issue: August 2016, page(s): 22, 23, 25, 26
http://www.ophthalmologymanagement.com/printarticle.aspx?articleID=114620
3/3
Portable device offers rapid high-definition meibomian gland imaging
Reviewed by Preeya K. Gupta, MD
August 01, 2016
Morrisville, NC—A recently introduced high-definition imaging device for evaluation of meibomian
glands (LipiScan, TearScience) measures lipid layer thickness and evaluates blink dynamics with an
efficient, easy to use device for clinical practices, said Preeya K. Gupta, MD, assistant professor of
ophthalmology, Duke University.
“Despite being smaller and easier to accommodate in a clinic, it still takes very high resolution
meibomian gland images,” she said. “I use it as a screening tool in my office to help identify patients
who might have meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) or who may have been misdiagnosed or
underdiagnosed in the past.”
She also uses it to screen both refractive surgery and cataract surgery candidates to identify coexisting
MGD that can lead to dry eye.
Before the development of imaging devices specifically for evaluation of the meibomian glands, it was
difficult to determine if a patient had gland atrophy and other signs of gland dysfunction such as dilation
or tortuosity, Dr. Gupta said. “Now you can identify anatomically whether or not there is gland
dysfunction or atrophy. As a clinician it has provided a lot of information about the meibomian glands
that we really didn’t have access to in the past.”
It is not only helpful for making a diagnosis but for framing treatment expectations in discussions with
patients, she added. For example, if the images showed very severe gland atrophy, she could explain
that the treatment goal is to preserve the few remaining glands, and that it could be an uphill battle. But
if the patient had relatively minor gland atrophy accompanied by symptomatic dry eye or MGD, she
could outline the specific treatment steps likely to produce improvement.
The device uses a patented technique that
takes high-definition images of the glands
using a transilluminator and near-infrared
technology, said Joseph Boorady, OD,
president and chief executive officer of Tear
Science.
The device and its predecessor (LipiView,
TearScience) have a transilluminator, which
everts the eyelid and uses a proprietary
infrared light source to image the lid, he said.
“The infrared light allows the camera on the lid
to take very high quality, high definition
images of the glands.”
“In order to accurately diagnose MGD, which
still today is vastly misunderstood and
underdiagnosed, you need to look at two things: structure and function. Look at the structure of the
meibomian glands and [whether they are] secreting lipid or not,” Dr. Boorady said.
Historically, doctors would transilluminate the eyelid and use a slit-lamp to evaluate the meibomian
glands when they wanted to look at the structure. However, the patented imaging technology
developed by the company provides a high-resolution view of the glands in under 10 seconds per lid, Dr.
Boorady said. Function can then be assessed using the slit-lamp along with the company’s handheld
meibomian gland evaluator or by manual expression.
Until relatively recently, tools for evaluating the meibomian gland had largely been found in research
settings and tended to be more sophisticated and complex than was necessary for the typical clinical
practice, Dr. Boorady said. The new product was developed in response to demand for a dedicated,
smaller, and less expensive device that produced high quality images.
"It’s been an easy instrument to integrate into clinical practice because it’s not invasive and it’s easy for
technicians to use and become familiar with,” Dr. Gupta said. “As a clinician, what I’m focused on is
whether a device going to give me good images, and also [whether] it easy for my staff to use. I would
say this device definitely captures excellent images…but it’s much more portable and compact and
easier to integrate, especially into higher volume practices and busy clinics.”
Dr. Gupta noted that the device is less expensive than one of the company’s previous developments
(LipiView II), and clinicians could purchase multiple devices for different office locations or more than
one in a large clinic. The device’s small footprint also makes it unlikely to disrupt patient flow, regardless
of the practice size and number of devices on site.
Introduced at the 2016 American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) symposium, the
device has had better than expected sales so far, Dr. Boorady said.
“I believe [physicians] are looking for an easy and cost effective way to get images so that they can
screen a lot more patients in their offices,” he said. “We believe we’ve filled that niche. More screening
and more identification of MGD will lead to more treatment, which is why we want to help doctors
identify this dysfunction.”
http://ophthalmologytimes.modernmedicine.com/ophthalmologytimes/news/portable-deviceoffers-rapid-high-definition-meibomian-gland-imaging?page=0,0
A failure to treat the surface before surgical procedures can slow healing.
BY W. BARRY LEE, MD
Ensuring the health of the ocular surface
before moving a patient to the OR is fundamental to achieving an optimal surgical
outcome. In the context of cataract and
refractive surgery patients, each procedure
yields a cutdown of the corneal nerves—
although the mechanisms for achieving this
are distinct. There is debate over whether
mechanical or laser-based incisions are more damaging, but
both procedures introduce the possibility of inducing neurotrophic dry eye.
Ensuring that the ocular surface is healthy before cataract
or refractive surgery also reduces the possibility of inaccurate
biometry and keratometry. Because about 75% of the eye’s
refractive power occurs at the ocular surface, any abnormalities increase the possibility that readings will be incorrect
and that, as a result, the IOL power or laser ablation pattern
may be incorrect.
Another consideration with regard to the ocular surface
is that lingering postoperative dry eye disease (DED) or meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) portends slower healing.
One could argue that the delayed recovery of visual ability is
more consequential for patients undergoing surgery specifically for refractive purposes, yet other categories of patients,
for example, those undergoing procedures to fix a corneal
structural defect (eg, corneal collagen cross-linking [CXL] or
keratoplasty), require equal consideration of the health of
the ocular surface preoperatively.
CONSEQUENCES OF DELAYED HEALING
The first 3 to 5 postsurgical days are crucial for a successful
outcome after keratoplasty. During the early postoperative
period, the epithelial layer heals over the transplant while
the surgical abrasion resolves. Thus, the risk of rejection and
infection are highest during this period.1
For the patient with untreated DED or MGD, however,
that healing period is potentially extended, so the risk of
rejection or infection is higher. Any patient undergoing a
keratoplasty procedure who has aqueous deficiency has to
be treated with some modality to improve tear production, whether it be cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.05%
(Restasis; Allergan), punctal plugs, or the frequent use of
artificial tears before the transplant. In patients with MGD,
the need for proper treatment preoperatively may be more
pressing, because affected meibomian glands can act as a reservoir for microbes, which can heighten the risk of infection.
With respect to CXL, the ultraviolet light used during
the procedure can affect the ocular surface of an eye with
untreated DED. In this scenario, there is a risk of causing
discomfort during and after the procedure as well as the
potential to slow healing and extend the time it takes for the
topography to normalize, especially if epithelium-off CXL is
performed.
DIRECTED TESTING
My protocol for evaluating surgical candidates’ ocular
surfaces does not change too much based on the procedure
planned. In my colleagues’ and my practice, we start most
patients with the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness
(SPEED) questionnaire, and our technicians can evaluate the
results to determine if an additional workup is warranted. If
the SPEED questionnaire is suggestive of DED and/or MGD,
then the patient will be moved directly to analysis with
the LipiView Ocular Surface Interferometer (TearScience),
regardless of the surgical indication. In particular, the
Figure 1. Severe inspissation of the meibomian glands was
discovered with frank obstruction of several glands.
JULY/AUGUST 2016 | ADVANCED OCULAR CARE 17
CORNEA/EXTERNAL DISEASE
OPTIMIZE THE OCULAR
SURFACE
CORNEA/EXTERNAL DISEASE
system’s Dynamic Meibomian Imaging is important for
identifying gland morphology. In our experience, anything
more than 50% blockage indicates a need to delay surgery
and initiate treatment.
For patients undergoing cataract and refractive surgeries, we have found the InflammaDry test (Rapid Pathogen
Screening), which tests for the presence and activity of
matrix metallopeptidase 9, to be important, because it
gives us a sense of the level of inflammation present at the
ocular surface. Another point-of-care test, tear osmolarity testing (TearLab), has been shown to be effective in
identifying patients with a higher likelihood of an unexpected refractive error resulting from inaccurate biometry.2
Topographic mapping may also provide clues to the status
of the ocular surface with dropout regions or irregular
mires on Placido disc images. Managing patients’ expectations through education is especially important for individuals receiving premium lens implants.
During the examination portion of the ocular surface
assessment, it is important to look at the lid margins.
Something I do now that I did not do earlier in my career
is to express the lid margin of the meibomian glands. I am
looking for an olive oil consistency as an indication of properly functioning glands; anything else, and I am directed to
investigate for potential MGD. For example, “soapsuds” or
the presence of oil globules in the tear film as well as inspissated meibomian glands are pathognomonic of MGD.
Less high-tech diagnostics also play an important role
in the workup. We use vital dye staining (lissamine green)
and a tear meniscus evaluation as the basis for understanding the nature of the tear film. Overall, these diagnostic
modalities add to the clinical impression; I am not sure if
one in particular is more important than the next.
Figure 2. Postoperatively, the keratoplasty was stable, and the
appearance of the lower eyelid had improved, with no signs
of meibomian gland inspissation 6 months after the LipiFlow
treatment of the eye shown in Figure 1.
18 ADVANCED OCULAR CARE | JULY/AUGUST 2016
AT A GLANCE
• Ensuring the health of the ocular surface before
performing any surgery is key to achieving optimal
visual outcomes.
• An unhealthy ocular surface negatively affects
preoperative measurements, because about 75% of the
eye’s refractive power occurs at the ocular surface.
• The author recommends examining the lid margins and
expressing the lid margins of the meibomian glands.
CASE EXAMPLES
No. 1
MGD is extremely important to identify and treat prior to
cataract surgery or corneal transplantation. Left untreated,
it increases the risk that microbial agents will enter the
eye during surgery, thus creating a heightened chance of
endophthalmitis.
A 52-year-old man was scheduled for corneal transplantation due to advanced keratoconus. During the preoperative
evaluation, severe inspissation of meibomian glands was discovered with frank obstruction of several glands (Figure 1).
A LipiFlow treatment was performed, and the patient was
scheduled for a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty 4 weeks
later. A postoperative photograph shows a stable keratoplasty and much improved appearance of the lower eyelid with
no signs of meibomian gland inspissation 6 months after the
Lipiflow treatment (Figure 2).
Figure 3. A slit-lamp examination showed a peripheral
Salzmann nodule.
CONCLUSION
The ocular surface’s health is one of the most important factors in the success of surgery and a positive visual
outcome. Whether the patient is undergoing cataract
surgery or a corneal transplant, the surgeon has to look
at the ocular surface to understand how it may affect
outcomes and then initiate aggressive treatment to optimize the surface prior to surgery. Identifying problems
beforehand means not having to do as much explaining
afterward. n
1. Sugar J, Montoya M, Dontchev M, et al. Donor risk factors for graft failure in the cornea donor study. Cornea.
2009;28:981-985.
2. Epitropoulos A, Matossian C, Berdy G, et al. Effect of tear osmolarity on repeatability of keratometry for cataract
surgery planning. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(8):1672-1677.
W. Barry Lee, MD
Partner at Eye Consultants of Atlanta
Comedical director of the Georgia Eye Bank, Atlanta
n [email protected]
n Financial disclosure: member of the speakers’ bureaus for Allergan
and Bausch + Lomb; consultant to Shire
n
n
CORNEA/EXTERNAL DISEASE
No. 2
Evaluating the corneal surface via a review of corneal topography and biometry, in conjunction with a careful slit-lamp
examination of the ocular surface prior to cataract surgery, is
extremely important. If they are not treated in advance, corneal diseases such as epithelial basement membrane dystrophy
and Salzmann nodules can have an impact on cataract surgery
outcomes. A 72-year-old woman with a decreased visual acuity of 20/80 OS presented for cataract surgery. The slit-lamp
examination showed a peripheral Salzmann nodule (Figure
3), and corneal topography revealed significant irregular astigmatism with a normal topography and a clear cornea in the
right eye. Biometry showed an average keratometry value of
42.87 D. The nodule was removed using a superficial keratectomy; after 6 weeks, the corneal surface normalized, and the
cornea appeared clear. The corneal topography normalized,
and repeat biometry showed an average keratometry value
of 44.75 D. This led to the selection of an IOL power that was
4.00 D higher than originally planned.
Without removal of the nodule prior to the cataract surgery, the patient would have experienced a hyperopic surprise
with irregular astigmatism, leading to an unsatisfactory visual
outcome.
12/15/2016
ONE­TO­ONE: TEARSCIENCE'S JOSEPH BOORADY, OD | OO Archives | Archives | Optometric Office
Issue Date: Optometric Office July 2016
ONE­TO­ONE: TEARSCIENCE'S JOSEPH BOORADY, OD
Richard Clompus, OD, FAAO
Joseph Boorady, OD, president and CEO of TearScience, has spent over 20 years in the ophthalmic industry as
an executive. Boorady held the role of senior vice president of sales, service and marketing at Carl Zeiss Meditec,
Inc, U.S. At Zeiss, he was responsible for all commercial activities of medical devices in ophthalmology,
neurosurgery, ENT, spine, dental and radiotherapy. Prior to Zeiss, Boorady held the position of COO of
Eyemaginations, was the executive director of SUNY College of Optometry and has owned and operated multiple
clinical facilities. Richard Clompus, OD: Dry eye has become a major complaint for many
patients. Treatment methods for evaporative dry eye and meibomian gland
dysfunction (MGD) are moving beyond eye drops to meibomian gland therapy.
TearScience has been at the forefront of new technology to diagnose and treat
MGD. How does the new LipiView II instrument help diagnose dry eye?
Joseph Boorady, OD: Dynamic meibomian imaging (DMI), available on both
the LipiView II and the recently launched Lipi­Scan, provides high quality
imaging of the meibomian gland structure. LipiScan is fast and has a small
footprint, which creates the opportunity for eyecare professionals (ECPs) to
easily introduce routine assessment of meibomian gland health. LipiView II
with DMI includes additional function metrics evaluating lipid layer thickness
and blink dynamics. RC: There has been significant interest by optometrists in the LipiFlow
instrument to treat MGD. Does this treatment system integrate well into
primary care practice?
JB: LipiFlow has been met with enthusiasm by the optometric community. The LipiFlow research began 10 years
ago. We started with front surface heat devices and found they are not effective due to the cooling effect of the lid.
Our research evolved LipiFlow to today’s proven inner­lid heating. LipiFlow has demonstrated unmatched clinical
results while setting the standard in MGD and all dry eye treatments. We have focused on making DMI and LipiFlow
affordable with smooth integration into the primary ECP’s practice. Our business model has shifted to affordability
and simple integration. Now, with LipiScan, speedy high definition images can be obtained in any standard workup.
RC: When do patients typically feel relief of symptoms following a LipiFlow treatment session?
JB: Studies have shown an increase of approximately three times in meibomian gland function and 50% symptom
improvement after a single 12­minute LipiFlow treatment. Results vary, but typically, patients feel symptom relief
within a couple of weeks, increasing in impact for approximately nine months. However, symptom relief is
subjective. The SPEED (Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness) questionnaire and gland evaluations should be
conducted before and after LipiFlow treatments to better manage MGD. We are also very pleased about our
outstanding results from a recent multicenter, randomized clinical study for LipiFlow patients reinforcing more than
30 sponsored and unsponsored clinical studies demonstrating LipiFlow efficacy. RC: Are there any words of advice you can offer to our colleagues who would like to increase dry eye care in their
practices? JB: We now know that MGD is involved in 86% of all dry eye cases and is an unrecognized cause even before
symptoms ever show up. It is highly comorbid with cataract and refractive procedures as well as contact lens
wearers. My advice to our colleagues is to look and screen all patients for MGD. We have made it convenient to do a
10­second image of each lower lid with the LipiScan and/or a simple push on the lid with a Korb MGE (Meibomian
Gland Evaluator) while observing the lid margin at the slit lamp to determine function. It’s now time to optimize care
for your patients simply by incorporating MGD into your routine protocol.
http://www.optometricoffice.com/OO/OO­Archives/5683.aspx?format=2
1/2
And, does it matter?
BY WHITNEY HAUSER, OD
The answers to the questions above are,
respectively, “probably” and “absolutely.”
Dry eye disease (DED) affects between 20
and 30 million people in the United States,
and, of those, meibomian gland dysfunction
(MGD) accounts for 86% of cases.1,2
With those statistics in mind, MGD is not
always the diagnosis, but it should be in the
differential for most ocular surface complaints. The best way
to identify MGD and manage it successfully is to follow three
steps: Listen, look, and then lead.
LISTEN
The first step in evaluating MGD is the most crucial and
the most commonly overlooked. Listen to the patient. It
sounds painfully simple, but many practitioners believe
they can quickly tick that box and then move on to the
physical examination. However, really listening to a patient
involves more than jotting down a chief complaint and the
corresponding history of present illness. Obtaining a thorough case history can be time-consuming, but, ultimately,
it makes the exam itself more efficient and will likely help
pinpoint the problem more accurately.
The patient says, “My vision gets blurry.” Blurred vision
can originate from innumerable refractive and pathologic
causes. However, it is also among the most common symptoms elicited from patients about their MGD. Visual disturbances associated with MGD can strike any time throughout the day, although many patients identify exacerbations
in the early evening or after extended use of digital devices.
A 2014 study evaluated light scatter in patients with aqueous tear deficiency (ATD) or MGD using the Optical Quality
Analysis System (OQAS; Visiometrics). The OQAS supplies
an objective measurement of optical aberration and loss of
transparency.4 Patients with MGD not only had higher mean
OQAS light scatter indices than those with ATD, they also
experienced momentary decreases in light scatter after blinking. Blinking had little or no influence on the ocular scatter
index in patients with ATD. Even when participants with
ATD had similar tear breakup time to those in the MGD
group, they had overall less scatter.5 This finding suggests
that MGD may pose unique challenges to visual quality.
The patient says, “I can’t wear my contact lenses comfortably as long as I’d like to.” About half of the 35 million contact lens wearers in the United States are suspected to have
DED.4 Many of them are undiagnosed, and they attribute
their daily struggle to just another aggravation of contact
lens wear. In reality, long-time contact lens wearers have a
greater prevalence of MGD than nonwearers.5 A 2009 study
found an association between contact lens wear and the
number of functional meibomian glands. Furthermore, the
number of glands was proportionate to duration of wear.5,6
Unfortunately, many practitioners are distracted by
patients’ complaints of burning, irritated eyes and decreased
wear time, and they consider these symptoms likely to be
contact lens-related complications. However, they also
resemble symptoms of MGD. Changing lens material,
modalities, and/or care systems will not likely yield relief
for these patients and will take up significant chair time.
Aggressive treatment of the MGD, on the other hand, may
prolong comfortable lens wear for both the day and the
long run.
COVER FOCUS
IS IT MGD?
LOOK
In recent years, the collective consciousness of eye care
providers has been raised with regard to lid health. This
trend is due to a greater understanding of the role that meibomian gland function plays in DED as well as an influx of
products to manage lid hygiene concerns.
• Lid positioning. Proper lid apposition to the globe is
crucial for the accessibility of the meibum to the other components of the tear film. Positioning may be hindered by
conjunctivochalsis, entropion, ectropion, and increasing laxity in the skin with age. Poor apposition may also occur after
oculoplastic surgery such as blepharoplasty. Lid movement
plays an integral role in the pumping of meibum out of the
glands; lid tension is required to accomplish this movement.7
• Lid and gland appearance. Staining with lissamine
green dye can identify devitalized cells on the cornea and
conjunctiva. Additionally, it is valuable for highlighting
the devitalized cells that accumulate at the mucocutaneous junction (MCJ). The MCJ forms between the dry,
keratinized skin of the eyelid and the wet mucous membrane of the palpebral conjunctiva. The stained surface
cells at the MCJ are also known as the line of Marx. The
presence of MGD and other inflammatory conditions
such as blepharitis are correlated with anatomic changes
to the MCJ and the line of Marx. Examples include
increases in the width, height, or position of these landmarks. Chronic tear instability can drive the surface cells
of the MCJ anteriorly as the disease state progresses. The
keratinized cells on the lid margin connect to form a
MAY/JUNE 2016 | ADVANCED OCULAR CARE 29
COVER FOCUS
meshwork of keratinized (or cornified) epithelium.8
Debridement of the MCJ and of the generalized buildup
of debris on the lower lid margin may provide significant
symptom amelioration and improvement in meibomian
gland function.9 A golf club spud can be used to mechanically reduce the thickened layer of cellular debris. The
improvement in gland function and reduction in patient
symptoms achieved with debridement scaling of the MCL
and keratinized lid margin has been demonstrated in multiple patient populations including patients with Sjögren
symptom with MGD. Comparing gland expression before
and after debridement can reinforce the benefits to the
practitioner and deliver relief to the patient.10
• Lid hygiene. Options for lid hygiene have exploded.
Surfactant wipes and foams, hypocholorous acid solutions,
tea tree oil products, and hyaluronic acid moisturizing
cleansers have all found their ways into practices across the
country. Each one potentially provides different benefits
for patients. A popular course of therapy for patients with
MGD includes a lid hygiene regimen and a bottle of artificial tears. Some practitioners find this plan too conservative, but both clinical experience and research support lid
hygiene as a therapeutically effective treatment for MGD.
Studies have shown improvement in tear breakup time
(30% of patients normalized to 10 seconds or greater) and
patient symptoms (88% of patients) as well as improvement
in gland patency.11,12
LEAD
Patients with MGD often leave their eye care providers’
office with the catch-all diagnosis of DED, which does not
truly define their condition. Patients require leadership and
direction from their doctor. Education specifically geared to
the chronic, progressive, and often inflammatory foundation of MGD is essential to ensure that patients understand
and acknowledge the nature of their problem. Removal
of barriers for the patient furthers compliance. Pitfalls for
MGD patients’ compliance include difficulty in forming
good habits and lack of product availability.
Offering written and web-based instructions can help
patients revisit the doctor’s directions at home and reinforce new behaviors. A study at the University of Alabama
School of Medicine found that simple, standardized instructions provided to patients after surgery led to a shorter
recovery period after surgery. Other studies have encouraged use of both written and verbal instructions to achieve
the best compliance.13 Compliance with recommendations
such as use of warm compresses is necessary for success. If
patients do not accept the need for MGD therapies, these
practices do not gain traction, and failure frustrates both
doctor and patient.
Selling over-the-counter goods such as heated masks and
30 ADVANCED OCULAR CARE | MAY/JUNE 2016
lid cleansers in the office can help to eliminate barriers for
patients to find and purchase these products independently. Consider offering nutritional supplements as well. Often
practitioners have particular preferences, but patients may
settle for store brands if left to compare products on their
own. Having supplements accessible in the office not only
ensures that patients use the prescribed treatment, but it
also helps make certain that they get the doctor’s preferred
MGD treatment.
CONCLUSION
The “listen, look, and lead model” is applicable to any
medical condition. Patients come to their doctors with
symptoms and hope they have found one who will listen
to their complaints and examine them thoroughly. Once a
diagnosis is made, the patient wants and needs leadership
to find resolution and relief. Considering its chronic and
progressive nature, MGD is no different and demands the
same attention and direction as other commonly seen conditions. Offering patients clear direction and a therapeutic
plan is essential to their acceptance of the disease state and
symptomatic improvement. n
The author would like to thank Caroline Blackie, BOptom,
MPhil, OD, PhD, FAAO, for her contributions.
1. Karpecki P. The evolution of dry eye. Review of Optometry. January 15, 2015.
2. Lemp MA, Crews LA, Bron AJ, et al. Distribution of aqueous-deficient and evaporative dry eye in a clinic-based patient
cohort: a retrospective study. Cornea. 2012;31(5):472-478.
3. Moore Q, Pflugfelder S. Blink-related changes in light scattering in meibomian gland dysfunction. Paper presented at:
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting; May 4, 2014; Orlando, FL.
4. Gatinel D. Documenting the need for cataract surgery in eyes with good visual acuity. Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Today Europe. May 2009:68-71.
5. Nichols JJ. Contact Lenses 2008. Contact Lens Spectrum. January 2009:24-32.
6. Arita R, Itoh K, Inoue K, et al. Contact lens wear is associated with decrease of meibomian glands. Ophthalmology.
2009;116(3):379-384.
7. Geerling G, Tauber J, Baudouin C, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report
of the subcommittee on management and treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
2011;52(4):2050-2064.
8. Knop E, Knop N, Millar T, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee
on anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the meibomian gland. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(4):1938-1978.
9. Korb DR, Blackie CA. Debridement-scaling: a new procedure that increases meibomian gland function and reduces dry
eye symptoms. Cornea. 2013;32(12):1554-1557.
10. Ngo W, Caffery B, Srinivasan S, Jones LW. Effect of lid debridement-scaling in Sjögren syndrome dry eye. Optom Vis
Sci. 2015;92(9):e316-320.
11. Guillon M, Maissa C, Wong S. Eyelid margin modification associated with eyelid hygiene in anterior blepharitis and
meibomian gland dysfunction. Eye Contact Lens. 2012;38(5):319-325.
12. Romero JM, Biser SA, Perry HD, et al. Conservative treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Eye Contact Lens.
2004;30(1):14-19.
13. Written Medical Instructions Increase Surgical Patient Compliance. MRC Medical Research Consultants. July 31, 2014.
http://www.mrchouston.com/written-medical-instructions-increase-surgical-patient-compliance. Accessed April 26, 2016.
Whitney Hauser, OD
Assistant professor at Southern College of Optometry, Memphis,
Tennessee
n (901) 229-2137; [email protected]
n Financial disclosures: board member for Paragon BioTeck and
TearLab and a speaker for and/or consultant to Akorn, Allergan,
BioTissue, Science Based Health, Lumenis, NovaBay, Shire, and
TearScience
n
12/15/2016
Ophthalmology Management
Article Date: 6/1/2016
When DED hits home
OM ASKED FIVE PROMINENT OPHTHALMOLOGISTS: STEPHANIE
B E C K E R , M D ; M A R Y D AV I D I A N , M D ; M A R G U E R I T E M C D O N A L D , M D ;
L A U R A P E R I M A N , M D ; A N D J O N AT H A N S O L O M O N , M D , T O
DISCUSS THEIR OWN PROBLEMS WITH DRY EYE DISEASE AND
H O W T H E Y D I S C U S S T H E I R S I T U AT I O N W I T H T H E I R D R Y E Y E
PAT I E N T S .
The conversation that ensues about dry eye disease is yet more proof that physicians are
also flesh and blood: We get sick, we seek medical attention, we adhere to medical
instruction. Because we were smart enough to choose ophthalmology, our knowledge base is
key to our health and happiness — a base we choose to share with our patients. Hence dry
eye, while it may impact us, does not define us. Please enjoy, and share your feedback with
us!
— Marguerite McDonald, MD, FACS
OM: Do you discuss your dry eye problem with your patients?
Dr. Solomon: Yes, often. I find a personal touch allows for better discourse. It opens the door to a
greater level of understanding. There’s stigma attached to certain medical conditions; dry eye has its
share, and a lot of it is surrounded by a fair amount of misunderstanding.
I don’t have the traditional dry eye situation, but I treat myself proactively. I am candid about my
management and my willingness to tailor treatment options to an individual. It is of value for me to
share my approach to my eye care. I describe my situation and my symptoms.
OM: When you speak about your situation, do you find patients
become more adherent?
Dr. Solomon: Whenever you describe a personal scenario, it brings the conversation down to a personal
level, to become less formal. It’s between friends as opposed to someone lecturing to a subordinate.
That’s important.
OM: Dr. McDonald, your thoughts?
Dr. McDonald: I don’t tell absolutely every patient, otherwise I’d be seeing three people a day. But if
they have moderate to severe dry eye and they say something like, ‘Gosh, all this takes a lot of time,’ or,
‘I really hate using the gel. It gets on my pillow case.’ I’ll say, ‘You know, I have OSD too. I use ointment
every night. I hate it too. But that’s the only way to feel really good in the morning.’ I will do that
especially if I sense anger and noncompliance. We all wish we were 18 again and could jump into bed
after brushing our teeth. Ointment at night is a mainstay if you have moderate to severe dry eye. So, I’ll
talk about it if I think it will lift the person’s spirits: ‘Gosh, my doctor does this. I guess I can find the
time to squirt a little lubricant in my eyes.’ Patients don’t want to be just a number. Any little thing that
helps you bond really goes a long way.
I also think some people still feel dry eye is an imaginary disease like restless leg syndrome. Some
doctors roll their eyes about that one because it’s the diagnosis of exclusion. ‘Oh, I saw her the other
day. She complains and what’s the matter with her?’ These patients are used to doctors who blow them
off. When they find one who doesn’t, who empathizes with them, they are so grateful.
http://www.ophthalmologymanagement.com/printarticle.aspx?articleID=114334
1/5
12/15/2016
Ophthalmology Management
Dr. Davidian: I agree. I think it helps them to know that we’re real people too. We’re not immune from
any of this. We may have suffered from the same symptoms and have gotten relief. When I encourage
patients to start Restasis I hear, ‘Well, is that really safe? I hate taking any drug. How do I know what
side effects that’s going to have?’ I tell them, ‘I also infrequently take medications, but I have felt very
comfortable taking this. There is no evidence that it gets systemically absorbed and enters your
bloodstream. I feel it’s extremely safe. It has really helped me.’ When they hear that, I think it helps to
encourage them to consider starting it.
I also hear, ‘Well, I just don’t have the time to do it every day. I’m too busy.’ I say, ‘Don’t think I’m any
less busy than you. If you want relief, you need to be compliant. I take my Restasis, and I put it in a
Dixie cup or even next to my toothbrush in the bathroom. Then, I have a visual cue because I know I’m
going to brush my teeth every morning and every evening, and I’m going to see my Restasis vials there,
and it’s going to trigger me to remember that I need to use it. And you need to do things like that to try
and be compliant.’ I’ve made the left turn now.
I’ve also had LipiFlow treatment, and I bring that up. If I think a patient is an appropriate candidate, I tell
them what my experience was like, that it was painless, that I was able to drive myself home at the end
of the day in the dark after seeing 50 patients and was totally comfortable.
I also say there isn’t one magic bullet that will solve their problem overnight and make them feel better.
Dry eye is, in fact, multifactorial. I think this reinforces the point that we doctors are real people who deal
with all the same issues and the stresses.
I say, ‘I also have to work at it and I do multiple things on a daily basis, and you have to kind of learn
how to condition yourself to accomplish certain things on a daily basis. When you do, you will feel
comfortable.
Dr. Becker: I discuss my dry eye with my patients all the time. I let them know that I can totally relate
to the dry eye issues they are having, and their concerns, since I have the same ones. I say I have the
same symptoms and complaints, and the same issues with not wanting to ‘take medicine’ or ‘be a
patient.’ I tell them that I have tried every single thing on myself that I would be using with them, so I
‘get it.’
Dr. Periman: I educate my patients that chronic DED (CDED) is a multi­factorial disease that deserves a
multi­disciplinary approach. Particularly with more severe disease, the list of medications and home care
they are required to do can be overwhelming. If patients understand the reason for each intervention,
compliance and success are enhanced. Each patient is educated with a combination of technician time,
physician time as well as written materials explaining each modality. Each patient leaves with an efficient
one page checklist that organizes the treatments, dosing frequencies and home care.
This helps ensure accurate relay of instructions to the patient, saves on call­back questions and also
saves the physician a significant amount of chair time. In our clinical experience, we have found that
when the patient brings back the form in follow­up, there is a high likelihood the instructions were
carefully followed and the patient has experienced improvement. The physician will give out gold stars for
good compliance as a simple, fun and rewarding way to keep the patient engaged in their own care.
A minority of patients are frustrated and struggle to cope with their chronic disease. We have found this
subset can benefit from objective measures, sympathetic or empathetic statements and words of hope
and comfort.
For example: 1) Show the patient their diagnostic information, confirming they have a real disease; 2) I
occasionally share that I also am a CDED patient and I understand their suffering; 3) I emphasize that
new treatments are coming and I will not give up doing everything I can to help them. When the patient
feels seen and heard, the body posture changes to a more relaxed form, they are more receptive to
treatments and the therapeutic relationship flourishes. Treating the whole patient is very rewarding to
me.
It’s worth the comfort. When you give that to the patient, they relax because their body posture
changes and it becomes a therapeutic relationship; I love that.
OM: Please tell us how you keep adherent.
Dr. McDonald: If I stop treating myself, I instantly do worse. My eyes get red, and I start to have
burning. So, my motivation is 100% staying functional, having good vision, looking normal, having nice
white eyes.
http://www.ophthalmologymanagement.com/printarticle.aspx?articleID=114334
2/5
12/15/2016
Ophthalmology Management
Dr. Becker: I am very motivated to keep up my regimen, otherwise my eyes are miserable. I have a
whole bunch of tricks to remind me to take my drops. One is the cell phone alarm.
I also leave a bottle of tears taped to my computer monitor so I remember to take them when I am
working. I also leave a bottle of tears in the extra cup holder of my car to remind me to take them when
I am driving, since the car’s heat and air conditioning makes my eyes feel dry.
Dr. Solomon: I never had issues with blurry vision, a primary symptom. I never had intermittent blurry
vision as my primary symptom. I have perfect vision. I’ve never had surgery. I’m pre­presbyopic. That’s
why it never dawned on me to think I had issues. I thought everybody woke up with a little bit of light
sensitivity when they walked into the bathroom and their eyes were always a little irritated. So it’s
serendipitous that I found out about my own ocular surface. Late in my training, I put a lubricating drop
in my eyes and I realized that there was a degree of relief throughout the day. It was such an odd
experience realizing that I had less irritation at the back of my head.
I thought, I may actually have dry eye issues. I was very aggressive. Practicing on the West Coast,
everything is about quality of life and doing things to improve it. It is interesting for patients to realize
that the reason we’re going about this is to try and minimize the impact on daily routine. I use oral
supplements as well, and if my eyes feel irritated that’s my way of reminding myself that I need to be on
my omega­3s, that I’ve got to be on my joint supplements. I get my drops in. It very much is
regimented. You have to be willing to kick into that routine, which is very tough for somebody who is
starting to understand the importance of medications and vitamins and so on, which is tough for
Generation X.
There is a gender difference here too. I think men just don’t do it well and are compliant with some of
these treatments. Women tend to do better about adherence. I use it as my canary in the coal mine.
When my eyes aren’t feeling well whether right or wrong, it’s usually an indication that holistically I need
to be a little bit better about improving my general health.
Dr. McDonald: I have a theory as to why men are a little less compliant. When you’re a female and
your mother takes you to an Ob/Gyn when you start to menstruate, she basically says you will be going
every year. The Ob/Gyn is sort of like your GP when you’re a teenager and otherwise healthy. You’re
used to going to doctors and being told what to do. Men are not. The first medicine they’re put on is dry
eye medication and they’re like, ‘What?” This messes with their idea of who they are. They have an idea
of who they are. ‘I don’t take medicine. I’m strong. I’m healthy,’ and this really upsets them.
Dr. Solomon: I’m glad you said it and not me.
OM: How do you keep motivated? Do you share your tips with
patients?
Dr. Davidian: For me, I tried to deny that I did have a serious dry eye problem, and what finally pushed
me over the edge was about a little over a year ago I started having difficulty wearing my soft contact
lenses because I was so dry. I thought, ‘I can’t do surgery comfortably with glasses on.’
I started taking Restasis, tears and omega­3s and the whole gamut of treatment, and it did make a
difference. As Marguerite said, when I fall behind because I go away or something happens and I get
crazy busy, I feel the difference.
I’m aware of the difference, which is proof that the treatment plan, when you do it in regimented
fashion, helps make a difference. And that’s what I tell my patients: I’m a real­life person and I face all
those same stresses, but I can tell you I notice the difference when I fall behind and so I use these little
tricks to give me visual cues.
OM: That’s so normal to be in denial. If, and when you tell your
patients that, how do they react?
Dr. Davidian: They kind of nod. They’re just processing it and, ‘Uh­huh, I fought back for a long time
too, it wasn’t a big deal or it wasn’t as bad as I thought it was. But now I’m really having a hard time
coping. And oh, look, she has that same experience.’
OM: Dr. Periman?
Dr. Periman: I do a lot to take care of my body. Mother Nature increases the amount of maintenance
work and self­care we must do as we age. I’m OK with that. The maintenance work looks different at
http://www.ophthalmologymanagement.com/printarticle.aspx?articleID=114334
3/5
12/15/2016
Ophthalmology Management
every age and in every chronic condition. Patient compliance and success seem to improve when you can
explain and link the treatment plans to an important self­care habit, like flossing and brushing your
teeth.
Dr. Becker: My eyes have been really dry forever. I was absolutely in denial. And really angry about it.
Even in college and medical school, I was miserable and couldn’t tolerate contact lens wear. I try to do all
the right things like working out, eating healthy and have always been healthy, so this is like my Achilles’
heel.
OM: How long do you give a product to work before you switch to
something else?
Dr. McDonald: If it’s an artificial tear, you’ll know within the first one or two applications if you like it or
not. Whereas with something like Restasis you have to hang in for months. It really is dependent on the
medicine or the therapy.
OM: So, you’re looking at this from a professional vantage point,
not necessarily from the confines of the FDA approval.
Dr. McDonald: Yes. Usually FDA guidelines actually bear some resemblance to the truth, but I will go
off­label if I think it’s going to help somebody and I think it’s safe, for sure.
Dr. Becker: I usually give any therapeutic regimen about six weeks — but patients have a ‘fall out’ rate
faster than that when they are frustrated. So, I usually see patients after two weeks of any therapeutic
change, other than starting Restasis, which I give six weeks. It takes a lot of conversation to explain to
patients that these aren’t magic fixes, so they need some time. Discussing pathophysiology of dry eye is
really helpful.
OM: Do you treat yourself?
Dr. McDonald: No, a colleague does.
Dr. Solomon: I have a colleague look at my eyes on a regular basis and just confirm my symptoms or
lack thereof and to make sure that I’m in a place where I need to be.
Dr. Davidian: My partner looks at my eyes.
OM: Why?
Dr. Davidian: To make sense of what we’re experiencing and what’s actually happening.
Dr. Periman: It would be disingenuous of us to not do it that way. OM
Marguerite McDonald, MD, is a cornea­refractive surgeon, Ophthalmic Consultants of
Long Island, Lynbrook, NY.; clinical professor, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY; adjunct
clinical professor, Tulane University, New Orleans. E­mail her at
[email protected].
Stephanie Becker, MD, is in private practice at Total Eye Care in Hicksville, N.Y.
Jonathan D. Solomon, MD, is in private practice at Solomon Eye Associates in Greenbelt,
Md., and is a consultant to the FDA’s Ophthalmic Device Panel.
http://www.ophthalmologymanagement.com/printarticle.aspx?articleID=114334
4/5
MEETING NEWS COVERAGEVIDEO
VIDEO: Surgeon talks about new device for meibomian gland imaging
May 8, 2016
NEW ORLEANS — At the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery meeting, Preeya K. Gupta,
MD, discusses the use of LipiScan, a meibomian gland imaging device from TearScience that identifies
meibomian gland atrophy in cataract, refractive and dry eye patients.
http://www.healio.com/ophthalmology/cornea-external-disease/news/online/%7B7e62af59-4376-4d849a3a-7a22197dd1e9%7D/video-surgeon-talks-about-new-device-for-meibomian-gland-imaging
In-office MGD treatments may provide relief but lack formal studies
By Richard Davidson, MD
March 15, 2016
Denver—Although in-office treatments for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) can be helpful, patients
also need to know that they must take a role in managing this chronic condition, said Richard S.
Davidson, MD.
Ophthalmologists must also systematically and consistently follow a treatment plan for patients with
MGD to provide relief, said Dr. Davidson, associate professor and vice chairman, University of Colorado
Health Eye Center, Denver.
A solid treatment approach for MGD is crucial because the condition may well be the leading cause of
dry eye, Dr. Davidson said. These patients often experience discomfort, and they make up a significant
portion of office visits.
“We probably all cringe on certain days when we see another burning, itching patient,” Dr. Davidson
said.
Additionally, an unhealthy ocular surface can affect surgical outcomes.
At-home treatment has been the mainstay for MGD, and this has included warm compresses, eyelid
scrubs, and gland expression performed by the patient, Dr. Davidson said.
However, these treatments come with their own challenges, including poor compliance, inadequate
heat levels, and patients only able to self-express the upper portion of the gland.
Overview of in-office treatments
These challenges have led to several in-office treatments for blepharitis that Dr. Davidson outlined.
One such device that helps with making the diagnosis is an interferometer (LipiView, TearScience) that
takes precise measurements of tear film thickness, takes dynamic meibomian imaging, and allows the
user to quantify lipid level of tear film.
“This is helpful for analytical patients because you can show them a number,” Dr. Davidson said.
The treatment arm of LipiView is Lipiflow, which applies heat to the inner eyelids. The device liquefies
meibomian gland contents and facilitates the release of secretion from the meibomian glands. The
treatment lasts about 12 minutes.
A couple of studies have analyzed Lipiflow results, including one with 40 eyes in 20 patients that found
that meibomian gland secretion scores increased at 1 month and lasted for 3 years.
The same study found that tear breakup time increased from baseline to 1 month but was not that
different compared with baseline at 3 years, Dr. Davidson said.
Another treatment for patients with MGD (BlephEx) consists of a medical-grade disposable microsponge that is applied to the edge of eyelids and lashes. The device removes debris and exfoliates
eyelids. The treatments last about 6 to 8 minutes, and patients must maintain good eyelid hygiene and
return for treatment every 4 to 6 months.
“In theory, it looks pretty good, but there is no data to show it’s beneficial,” Dr. Davidson said.
A fourth device (MiBoFlo ThermoFlo, MiBo Medical Group) is a thermoelectric heat pump that liquefies
the meibum and facilitates the expression of gland secretions. Heat is applied to the outside of the lids,
breaking down hardened material inside the glands. The treatment takes up to 12 minutes each eye.
One study showed improvement in 73% of patients who had had previous Lipiflow, Dr. Davidson said.
Yet, another MGD treatment is intense pulsed light, for which there is a paucity of published data for
ophthalmic indications, Dr. Davidson said.
However, some research has shown a reduction in artificial tear usage, a decrease in the Ocular Surface
Disease Index score, and a reduction in lid margin edema and vascularity. Patients must return for
maintenance treatments every 6 months to a year.
Finally, Dr. Davidson addressed intraductal meibomian gland probing, in which one study reported 96%
of the 25 patients included had immediate post-probing relief. However, the treatment can be painful,
he added.
One drawback that may hurt in-office treatments for MGD is cost and reimbursement, Dr. Davidson
said.
http://ophthalmologytimes.modernmedicine.com/ophthalmologytimes/news/office-mgd-treatmentsmay-provide-relief-lack-formal-studies?page=0,3
COVER FOCUS
MY ALGORITHM FOR DED
Our experts’ go-to therapies deconstructed.
BY NEDA SHAMIE, MD; ALICE T. EPITROPOULOS, MD; ELIZABETH L. YEU, MD;
P. DEE G. STEPHENSON, MD; SHERI ROWEN, MD; AND CATHLEEN MCCABE, MD
NEDA SHAMIE, MD
Individualize treatment.
n Assess inflammation.
n Prescribe a 2-week course of steroids
plus 3 to 6 months (and often longer)
of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion
0.05% (Restasis; Allergan) twice a day.
n Increase the patient’s intake of
omega-3 fatty acids.
n Look for comorbid conditions
(eg, conjunctivochalasis, incomplete
blink reflex, etc.).
n
Patients who rely daily on artificial tears deserve a
closer evaluation to rule out dysfunctional tear syndrome
or monitoring for progressively worsening symptoms. A
customized approach is important. The patient may have
significant meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), ocular
surface inflammation as a result of underlying allergies, or
possibly conjunctivochalasis or other mechanical abnormalities that can contribute to ocular surface disease
(OSD). The most likely scenario is a combination of factors.
After determining the presence of inflammation, based
on clinical presentation or the use of InflammaDry (Rapid
Pathogen Screening), I prescribe a 2-week course of steroids. My preference is loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic
ointment 0.5% (Lotemax; Bausch + Lomb) administered at
bedtime, with at least 3 to 6 months of therapy with cyclosporine. I also advise my patients to increase their intake of
omega-3 fatty acids through supplementation; Physician
Recommended Nutriceuticals is my preferred brand. In
addition, I suggest to my patients that they add more
omega-3 fatty acids to their diet.
If significant rosacea is present, I prescribe 50 mg/day oral
doxycycline for at least 3 months or topical azithromycin
(AzaSite; Akorn) nightly. If there is trichiasis, I remove those
lashes. If the patient has conjunctivochalasis and symptoms
of discomfort remain despite aggressive treatment of the
60 CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGERY TODAY | JANUARY 2016
ocular surface, I proceed with conjunctival resection. For
patients with severe punctate epitheliopathy or dry eyes
related to neurotrophic keratopathy, I recommend autologous serum drops. I offer the option of a PROSE (prosthetic
replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem) scleral lens
to patients who experience little to no improvement with
topical treatments.
ALICE T. EPITROPOULOS, MD
Assess the patient for an unstable tear
film.
n Initiate early treatment.
n Administer the Standard Patient
Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED)
questionnaire.
n Increase the patient’s intake of
omega-3 fatty acids.
n Tailor treatment to the severity of the
disease.
n Prescribe a topical corticosteroid with
cyclosporine.
n
The tear film is the most important refractive surface of the
eye. Instability can render biometry unpredictable, delay healing,
and lead to suboptimal results after surgery. Evaporative DED is
the most common form of OSD.1 In my opinion, this condition
is what causes some patients to be frustrated, dissatisfied, or
unhappy with the results of cataract or refractive surgery.
MGD is a progressive disease. If not treated, it can lead
to glandular atrophy and loss of function. In my experience, meibography using the LipiView II Ocular Surface
Interferometer (TearScience) is an excellent tool with
which to identify these patients early, and it also serves
as a great opportunity to educate patients and guide the
discussion about the disease. I think LipiView II is what will
take LipiFlow (TearScience) thermal pulsation to the next
level. Patients can now see what their glands look like ver-
ELIZABETH L. YEU, MD
Listen to the patient.
n Assess the causes of OSD, which are
likely multifactorial.
n
from a patient with recurrent corneal erosion syndrome who
experiences unilateral, sharp pains and tearing.
P. DEE G. STEPHENSON, MD
Listen to the patient.
n Administer the SPEED questionnaire.
n Evaluate tear osmolarity and use the
InflammaDry test.
n Treat with cyclosporine, omega-3 fatty
acids, and topical steroids.
n Consider new treatments for blepharitis such as the BlephEx (RySurg).
n
COVER FOCUS
sus what they should look like. Conventional treatments
do not address meibomian gland obstruction.
There are several traditional but valuable ways of evaluating
DED. I have found tear breakup time, (TBUT) corneal topography, and fluorescein staining to be most helpful. Options
have changed dramatically during the past several years owing
to the improved specificity and objectivity of point-of-care
testing. OSD results in hyperosmolarity, which in turn contributes to an unstable tear film, the hallmark of DED.
Treatment should be tailored to the severity of the
disease. Reducing inflammation is the primary goal of
treating moderate to advanced DED. Cyclosporine is
extremely effective in my patients with DED, because the
drug increases natural tear production and slows disease
progression. A topical corticosteroid can rapidly reduce
inflammation and work synergistically with cyclosporine.
I also recommend omega-3 fatty acids, because they
reduce inflammation and increase tear production.2 I prefer re-esterified nutritional supplements from Physician
Recommended Nutriceuticals, because they are a highquality, purified, triglyceride formulation and I find them to
have excellent tolerability and absorption.
Blepharitis is a common diagnosis associated with DED.
Conventional treatments such as cleaning the lids with baby
shampoo can sometimes exacerbate symptoms. A new
approach, Avenova (NovaBay Pharmaceuticals), uses hypochlorous acid in saline, which is a bactericidal component
found in white blood cells. I have found this treatment to be
extremely effective for patients with MGD and blepharitis.
DED decreases surgical predictability and can adversely affect
outcomes. I never hesitate to delay surgery until the ocular surface is healthy enough to generate accurate measurements.
DED can be extremely burdensome to both the patient
and the doctor. It is a real disease, and the treatment is ever
changing and long term. A good game plan is a must, along
with patience, empathy, and listening to the patient describe
his or her symptoms. Nearly all of my patients complete the
SPEED questionnaire. It is important to determine what type
of disease the patient has or if it is a combination.
I perform a corneal evaluation using fluorescein staining and
a conjunctival evaluation with lissamine green as well as TBUT
testing. I also assess the meibomian glands. I examine the lid
margins for Demodex, greasy lashes, and lash loss. Treating the
inflammatory component of the disease is important. I prescribe cylosporine, omega-3 fatty acids, and topical steroids to
reestablish the tear film. I use punctal plugs if needed.
An evaluation of the meibomian glands and the oil layer
of the tear film is crucial. I use the LipiView II and LipiFlow
treatment as needed. I perform a DED workup on preoperative cataract patients and treat the disease aggressively so
that optimal preoperative testing can be performed.
BlephEx is a great new addition to the treatment options
for blepharitis. This in-office procedure helps improve MGD
and symptoms of DED by removing the excess bacteria biofilm and inflammatory exotoxins along the lid margin.
SHERI ROWEN, MD
The diagnosis and management of dry eye disease (DED)
have blossomed in the past several years. Bearing in mind the
patient’s symptomatology is just as important as incorporating
the diagnostics and clinical examination into the big picture.
For example, the timing and qualities of the patient’s discomfort can be very revealing. The patient with OSD who
complains more of a burning sensation first thing in the morning from MGD is very different from one who suffers from
fluctuating foreign body sensation that worsens throughout
the day due to aqueous-deficiency issues. Likewise, a patient
with MGD who feels bilateral burning in his or her eyes differs
The importance of lid hygiene is
underrecognized.
n Early recognition of MGD is needed.
n Glands should be expressed manually
at the initial office visit.
n
We ophthalmologists have missed the importance of lid
hygiene. With the rapidly increasing prevalence of dysfunctional tear syndrome, we need to take a second look. Every
JANUARY 2016 | CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGERY TODAY 61
COVER FOCUS
patient should be evaluated in his or her 20s to 30s to
determine who will be at risk for plugged glands.
Every patient who walks into our practices should routinely have the following diagnostic tests performed. First,
a SPEED questionnaire to determine if symptoms exist. If
positive (> 6), these patients should have their tear osmolarity tested. InflammaDry should also be performed to
assess inflammation, along with fluorescein staining (with a
fluorescein strip only and balanced salt solution to evaluate
the staining), and TBUT should be measured.
If patients are suffering from inflammation, I direct
them to use cyclosporine drops twice daily and omega-3
supplements as needed for anti-inflammatory effect and to
improve the composition of the oil film. I add loteprednol
etabonate as well. If only the glands are affected, I will have
the patient imaged using the LipiView II to examine the
meibomian glands and assess the oil layer. The Keratograph
corneal topographer (Oculus) can also evaluate TBUT.
I examine the lid margins for flaking and anterior blepharitis, and if it is present, I institute lid scrubs and warm
compresses. I have found that Avenova is effective at killing Staphylococcus. I believe that every patient should have
manual meibomian gland expression performed at the
initial office visit. This will reveal the preliminary level of
blockages and the composition of the oil, which will range
from olive oil to complete blockage with no oil expressed.
I cannot stress enough how important this step is and how
rarely it is performed. The dysfunction and blockages of the
meibomian glands very often precede the signs and symptoms, and we clinicians must start to focus on early diagnosis and prevention. This would mimic the dental hygiene
model: we would evaluate and then express meibomian
glands early to prevent long-term blockages, dilation, truncation, and permanent atrophy.
Early treatment with LipiFlow or intense pulsed light can
be instituted to unblock the meibomian glands, and their
manual expression every 3 months with a cotton swab will
prolong the effect until the glands finally produce normal
oil. This process can take as long as 2 years in patients with
severe disease.
Following treatment with cyclosporine for at least a
month, a Schirmer test can be performed; if results are low,
plugs can then be placed. I find that pretreatment with
cyclosporine helps to reduce the inflammatory mediators
that are residing in the tear lake.
In 86% of patients, the meibomian glands will be affected, and as soon as they are expressed to assess the quality
and quantity of the secretions, they can start performing
again.1 Until now, expression was not a part of the normal eye examination, but we can make a big difference by
just recognizing MGD, especially earlier in patients’ lives.
Owing to limited and partial blinking, especially with digital
devices, the meibomian orifices actually become keratinized, eventually leading to blockages. These can be released
62 CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGERY TODAY | JANUARY 2016
through light debridement with a spud or BlephEx and
with expression. I predict routine meibomian expression
with control of inflammation will become the new norm
for eye examinations and lid hygiene, with the creation of a
new specialty of ocular hygienists.
CATHLEEN M. M C CABE, MD
n
Top 13 Practice Pearls
No. 1.
Early recognition and treatment are key. Look
carefully for signs and symptoms even in younger
patients. This is especially important in patients
prior to refractive or cataract surgery to improve
the quality of measurements and the outcome of
surgery. This also helps avoid the misconception
that patients have about the cause of the problem
if DED is only identified, discussed, and treated
after surgery, even though it was present before.
No. 2.
An intake questionnaire (in my practice, we use a
modified SPEED questionnaire) empowers technicians to perform important testing (tear osmolarity, staining of the conjunctiva, and cornea) prior
to seeing the doctor.
No. 3.
Evaluation of the quality and quantity of meibum
can be easily performed in the office with pressure
on the lower lid.
No. 4.
Low-tech equipment, such as a slit-lamp photograph taken with a smartphone camera, can be very
useful in educating the patient on the problem.
No. 5.
Patients’ understanding of the symptoms of DED
(tearing, fluctuating vision, burning, redness) can
improve their compliance with treatment and
follow-up. Educational posters and videos in the
waiting room and exam rooms can be very helpful.
No. 6.
High-quality, bioavailable omega-3 fatty acid
supplements are a powerful aid in improving
MGD. I also discuss sources of omega-3s (fatty
fish, walnuts, chia seeds, etc.). I usually advise the
patient that it can take 4 to 6 weeks to notice an
improvement in DED, and I will re-evaluate him or
her around this time.
No. 8.
No. 9.
To help patients with symptoms exacerbated
when reading or on the computer, I recommend
the “20/20 rule”: every 20 minutes put in a lubricating drop and close your eyes for 20 seconds.
For presbyopes, I also recommend looking at distance (approximately 20 feet).
There are apps available for smartphones and
tablets that will remind patients to put in drops at
regular intervals. Time Out (available in the Apple
App Store) will fade the computer screen out to
a color at set intervals for a set amount of time
(eg, every 20 minutes for 20 seconds).
For patients with more severe DED symptoms
who have difficulty instilling drops, lubricating gel
in a tube (Systane or Genteal [both from Alcon])
used in smaller amounts during the day can be
effective. I warn the patient that his or her vision
will be blurry for 1 to 2 minutes after instillation.
A gel formulation can be much easier to administer for patients with difficulty extending their
neck, because it can be instilled with the head in
an upright position.
No. 10. Microwave-heated compresses, such as the Bruder
Moist Heat Compress, make complying with
warm compress treatment easier for patients.
An inexpensive alternative is to put several clean
washcloths in a bowl with water, heat the bowl of
water in the microwave, and serially remove the
compresses to maintain a warm temperature on
the lids. Reheating a baked potato in the microwave after pricking the skin also works well.
early, treat early, and follow up frequently in cases
of DED, in hopes of preventing the more end-stage
disease we frequently see presenting to our clinics. n
1. Lemp MA, Crews LA, Bron AJ, et al. Distribution of aqueous-deficient and evaporative dry eye in a clinic-based patient
cohort: a retrospective study. Cornea. 2012;31(5):472-478.
2. Bhargava R, Kumar P, Kumar M, et al. A randomized controlled trial of omega-3 fatty acids in dry eye syndrome. Int J
Ophthalmol. 2013;6(6):811-816.
Neda Shamie, MD
associate professor of ophthalmology at the University of Southern
California (USC) Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine at USC
n medical director at the USC Eye Center-Beverly Hills
n medical director at Tissue Banks International
n [email protected]
n financial disclosure: consultant to Alcon, Allergan, Bausch + Lomb,
Nicox, Shire, and Tissue Banks International
n
COVER FOCUS
No. 7.
Alice T. Epitropoulos, MD
cofounder and owner of The Eye Center of Columbus
partner at Ophthalmic Surgeons & Consultants of Ohio
n clinical assistant professor at The Ohio State University Department
of Ophthalmology
n (614) 221-7464; [email protected]
n financial disclosure: consultant to Allergan, Bausch + Lomb, NovaBay,
PRN, Shire, TearLab, and TearScience
n
n
Elizabeth L. Yeu, MD
private practice at the Virginia Eye Consultants in Norfolk, Virginia
assistant professor in the Department of Ophthalmology at Eastern
Virginia Medical School
n [email protected]
n financial disclosure: consultant to Abbott Medical Optics, Alcon,
Allergan, Rapid Pathogen Screening, Shire, and TearLab
n
n
P. Dee G. Stephenson, MD
founder and director of Stephenson Eye Associates in Venice, Florida
associate professor of ophthalmology at the University of South
Florida in Tampa
n president of the American College of Eye Surgeons
n (941) 485-1121; [email protected]
n financial interest: none acknowledged
n
n
No. 11. Briefly explaning how cyclosporine works (by
down-regulating receptors on inflammatory cells
to interrupt the inflammatory cycle that exacerbates DED) helps patients to understand the
importance of compliance with twice-daily dosing and the reason for the 2 months of treatment
required before they notice an improvement
in symptoms. I schedule the follow-up visit at
2 months and emphasize that treatment will be
long term.
No. 12. In cases of very severe and persistent DED, I have
found serum tears and Prokera Slim amniotic membrane (Bio-Tissue) therapies to be very effective.
No. 13. Effective evaluation and treatment of DED can be
achieved without high-tech diagnostic and treatment tools. It is a great service to the patient to look
Sheri Rowen MD
NVision Centers in Newport Beach, California
(410) 402-0122; [email protected]
n financial disclosure: in-house consultant to Alphaeon Strathspey
Crown; she also disclosed a financial relationship with Ace Vision
Group, Allergan, and Bausch+Lomb
n
n
Cathleen M. McCabe, MD
cataract and refractive specialist practicing at The
Eye Associates in Bradenton and Sarasota, Florida
n (941) 792-2020; [email protected]; Twitter @CathyEye
n financial disclosure: speaker for Abbott Medical Optics, consultant
to Allergan, and speaker for and consultant to Alcon and Bausch +
Lomb
n
JANUARY 2016 | CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGERY TODAY 63
MEETING NEWS COVERAGEVIDEO
VIDEO: Surgeon gives tips for treating lid margin, dry eye disease
January 21, 2016
WAIKOLOA, Hawaii — At Hawaiian Eye, Alice T. Epitropoulos, MD, gives an overview of the many new –
and old but still efficacious – treatments for lid margin and dry eye disease.
http://www.healio.com/ophthalmology/cornea-external-disease/news/online/%7B98ca22f7-ec21-44b795a5-7b0ef422bcd3%7D/video-surgeon-gives-tips-for-treating-lid-margin-dry-eye-disease