Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Balancing Sight and Safety with a Non-Complaint Specialty Lens Patient Kelly Voltz, Eva Duchnowski, OD INTRODUCTION: Contact lenses are a safe and effective method of visual correction and are a well-documented treatment option for corneal disease.1 Recently, there has been a resurgence of specialty lenses due to the evolvement of lens materials and oxygen transmissibility capabilities. Despite their improved clinical performance, specialty lenses’ complexities and possible adverse effects are not yet well understood. Existing literature provides some cases of infection, while hypoxia and inflammation have rarely been reported.2 This case study discusses complications in a noncompliant wearer of modern, high Dk specialty lenses. DISCUSSION: According to a recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study, nearly 33% of contact lens patients report going to the doctor for red or painful eyes due to contact lens wear.3 Contact lenses have physiological, metabolic, and anatomical effects on the eyes, which can manifest on the eyelids, lacrimal tear film, conjunctiva and throughout all layers of the cornea.4 In 1995, Tan et al. reported on a total of 517 eyes wearing low Dk scleral contacts; they found the most common complications to be neovascularization (13.3%) and corneal edema (7.4%) secondary to corneal hypoxia. The most common causes of corneal hypoxia are sleeping in lenses and prolonged wear without removal. It is important to provide patients with adequate introduction and instructions on handling, disinfection, and storage of specialty lenses to maintain proper lens hygiene and protect the anterior ocular surface. CASE: CORNEA FOLLOW UP VISIT INITIAL ENCOUNTER The patient continued to wear scleral lens OD despite doctors recommendations of discontinuing for corneal safety. Corneal evaluation revealed progressive deep stromal neovascularization into the visual axis ultimately decreasing the best-corrected visual acuity of the right eye. A 36 year-old Caucasian female with advanced bilateral keratoconus of unknown duration presented for contact lens evaluation. The patient was previously fit in corneal scleral lenses OU with appropriate parameters according to manufacturer fitting guides and practitioner examination. The patient was lost to follow up for four years until she presented to clinic due to loss of the left lens. Ocular History: Medical History: Asthma Keratoconus OU, unknown duration Medications: None Dacrocystitis OS, one time occurrence, no current complications Corneal Neovascularization OU secondary to hybrid lens non-compliance Visual Acuity: OD c: 20/60 OD s: 20/400 OS c: Unknown, lens lost OS s: 20/400 Current Contact Lens: ART Optical SoClear® corneal sclerals OD: -17.00sph BC 6.15 Dia 14.0 Material XO2 Clear Edge 0.5 Flat OS: -12.50sph BC 6.03 Dia 14.0 Material XO2 Clear Edge STD Corneal Examination: Topography: 3 20/40 20/60 20/80 NON-COMPLIANCE INDUCED COMPLICATIONS OD: 15 Missed appointments 7 Missed referrals to corneal specialists Cornea OD Cornea OS Initial Exam Clear 3 years later 4mm Clear 4mm 1 year later 4mm* 4.5mm 4 years later 6mm 5mm* 1 year later 5mm* 8mm 4 Years lost to follow up at one time Non- Compliance • Not applicable: no lens wear • Overwear hybrid lenses OU • Sleeping in lenses; not filling lenses • Overwear of hybrid lens OD • OS lens lost • Filling scleral lens with generic Multi- Purpose Solution • Continues to wear 5 year old scleral lens OD against doctor's advice *ghost vessels CONCLUSION: SCLERAL LENS FITTING FOR FUTURE VISION OS: Contact lens compliance plays an important role in the ocular health and visual outcome of a specialty lens patient. Encouraging specialty lens wearers to improve ocular hygiene behaviors is a necessary practice that directly contributes to the longevity of a healthy ocular surface and overall visual success. When patients fail to comply with doctor recommendations concerning contact lenses, the results on vision can be devastating. Successful lens fitting of the left eye achieving 20/40 vision REFERENCES: 1. Suchecki, J. K., Donshik, P., & Ehlers, W. H. (2003). Contact lens complications. Ophthalmology Clinics of North America, 16(3), 471-484. 2. Walker, M. K., Bergmanson, J. P., Miller, W. L., Marsack, J. D., & Johnson, L. A. (2016). Complications and fitting challenges associated with scleral contact lenses: A review. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, 39(2), 88-96. 3. Cope, J. R., Collier, S. A., Rao, M. M., Chalmers, R., Mitchell, G. L., Richdale, K., ... & Zimmerman, A. (2015). Contact lens wearer demographics and risk behaviors for contact lens-related eye infections—United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 64(32), 865-870. 4. Collier SA, Gronostaj MP, MacGurn AK, et al. Estimated burden of keratitis—United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014;63:1027–30. 5. Tan, D. T., Pullum, K. W., & Buckley, R. J. (1995). Medical applications of scleral contact lenses: 2. Gas-permeable scleral contact lenses. Cornea, 14(2), 130-137. 3 Emergency exams Management: A B Keratoconus OU: Patient was advised to discontinue OD lens wear and was refit into new scleral lens OS Proper lens care and handling was reviewed with patient in detail as she was not filling lenses prior to insertion Corneal Neovascularization OD: Patient educated to discontinue wear of lens OD, referred to corneal specialist for corneal evaluation Lens Parameters: EUROPA® Scleral Lens OS: -13.75-2.00x007 BC 6.25 Dia 18.0 OZ 9.0 Material Boston XO CT 0.35 Central Vault 6202 Peripheral Curves 6.11/2.0 10.0/1.0 15/0.5 After receiving a new OS lens, patient once again was lost to follow up .