Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
XXVIII Riunione Nazionale MITO “Il lato oscuro di Venere” Mesagne (Brindisi), 19-20 Gennaio 2017 Studio retrospettivo sulla correlazione tra fattori biologici immunologici e outcome nelle pazienti con tumori ginecologici (MITO24): PROGRESS REPORT Sara Testoni, Ugo De Giorgi Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (I.R.S.T.) IRCCS Meldola Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), Platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and Title of the project Neutrophyls/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as prognostic/predictive factors in gynecological cancers. Research line Prognostic factors in gynecological cancers Principal Investigator Ugo De Giorgi Medical Oncology , IRST-IRCCS Address and e-mail Via P. Maroncelli 47014 Meldola [email protected] Participating centres Centres from MITO group Cancer and inflammation Cancer and inflammation are strictly linked and cancer patients present local and systemic modifications in inflammatory parameters as the Neutrophyl/Lymphocyte ratio (NLR), in erythrocyte sedimentation rate, in the level of serum inflammatory cytokines, and acute-phase proteins, as well as observed in infectious or inflammatory diseases.1-3 Platelets can induce circulating tumor cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition and promote extravasation to metastatic sites. 4,5 Neutrophyls can promote adhesion and seeding of distant organ sites through secretion of circulating growth factors such as VEGF and proteases. 6,7 Lymphocytes play a crucial role in tumor defense by inducing cytotoxic cell death and inhibiting tumor cell proliferation and migration, thereby dictating the host immune response to malignancy.8 Inflammation induces cancer microenvironment and systemic changes that are favorable for cancer progression. References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Cancer and inflammation: implications for pharmacology and therapeutics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Apr;87(4):401-6 Gabay C, Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. New Engl J Medi1999;340(6):448–54 Guthrie GJ, Charlesb KA, Roxburgha CS, Horgana PG, McMillana DC, Clarkec SJ. The systemic inflammation-based neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio: Experience in patients with cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013 ;88(1):218-30 Labelle M, Begum S, Hynes RO. Direct signaling btween platelets and cancer cells induces epithelial-mesenchymal-like transition and promote metastasis. Cancer Cell 2011; 20:576-590. Schumacher D, Strilic B, Sivaraj KK, et al. Platelet-derived nucleotides promote tumor-cell transendothelial migration and metastasis via P2Y2 receptor. Cancer Cell 2013;24:130-137. Cools-Lartigue J, Spicer J, McDonald B, et al. Neutrophyl extracellular traps sequester circulating tumor cells and promote metastasis. J Clin Invest 2013; 123:3446-58. Rossi L, Santoni M, Crabb SJ, Scarpi E, Burattini L, Chau C, Bianchi E, Savini A, Burgio SL, Conti A, Conteduca V, Cascinu S, De Giorgi. U. High Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio Persistent During First-line Chemotherapy Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep 19. [Epub ahead of print] De Giorgi U, Mego M, Scarpi E, Giuliano M, Giordano A, Reuben JM, Valero V, Ueno NT, Hortobagyi GN, Cristofanilli M. Relationship between lymphocytopenia and circulating tumor cells as prognostic factors for overall survival in metastatic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2012;12(4):264-9. Background Background Objectives To evaluate prognostic and predictive implications of SII, PLR, NLR levels and changes associated and establish a novel risk stratification model in patients with advanced GC receiving chemotherapy +/- other agents. Primary objective: correlations with OS Secondary objective: correlations with PFS, ORR, safety, histotypes, CA125. Study design and study population Review retrospectively medical charts of patients with advanced gynaecological cancers (GC) treated with 1st line CT (+/- bevacizumab for ovarian cancer ) or subsequent therapies from 1st January 2007 to 30th June 2015. Databases will be separated according to the primary tumors and clinical setting: 1st line Cervical Cancer (CC) 1st line Endometrial cancer (EC) 1st line Ovarian Cancer (OC) A specific sub-study on SII, PLR and NLR in OC treated with or without bevacizumab in 1st line setting will be performed focusing on patients with stage III-IV. 2nd line OC (sharing between patients with platinum sensitive/refractory disease) The optimal cut-off values of SII, PLR and NLR will be evaluated in every disease and setting at baseline (C1D1 pre-therapy) and before the 2nd cycle (C2D1 pre-therapy). Exclusion criteria will include: <1month from treatment use of steroids or other systemic antineoplastic therapy <1 month from treatment or during the 1st cycle of CT onset of infection G-CSF use within 1 week from the 2nd cycle Database (1st line Ovarian Cancer) Family history Date of of breast or stage III ASCITES Center Pt number Histology Grading birth ovarian or IV YES/NO cancer (Y/N) Baseline Baseline Baseline Baseline platelet neutrofil lymphocite PS (ECOG) ca125 value count count count Weight (kg) before before before 2nd nd 2 cycle 2nd cycle cycle platelet neutrofil lymphocite count count count Best 1st line Date of date dose Interval response regimen (eg number last start 1st reducti surgery, RECIST carbo-taxof cycle line on yes or criteria beva) with cycles of 1st chemo yes/not not (CR, PR, doses line CT SD, PD) Height (cm) Metastatic sites before 1° line (PE=peritoneum, LI=liver, LU=lung, BO=bone, PL=pleura; SP=spleen, MN=mediastinal nodes, RN=retroperitoneal nodes, others…specify) before 2nd before 2nd cycle (precycle ca125 2nd cycle) value NLR value During following cycles Ca125 lower value and cycle neutropenia G-CSF use Reason for CT grade 4 in the in the first (and/or beva) Grade 3-4 toxicities first cycle (yes cycles (yes interruption) or not or not) Date of progression Progression Number of further Date of death or (or date of last score (0=no, CT regimens last follow-up follow-up if no PD) 1=yes) Status at last follow-up score 0=alive 1=dead comments/ further information Participating centres No. Pazienti segnalati/inseriti 178 Numero tot di casi ricevuti 149 Casi trattati con carbo-tax+BEVA 33 33 1 (3%) Oncologia Ospedale Infermi 0 0 0 Oncologia Medica Seconda Università di Napoli (SUN) 22 22 8 (36%) Ospedale Legnago 11 43 6 (14%) U.O.Medicina Oncologica di Carpi, AUSL di Modena 34 34 8 (24%) 6 0 - 6 6 0 Istituto Tumori “Pascale” 10 0 - Giorgia Mangili HSRaffaele 62 62 Giovanni Scambia Ginecologia OncologicaPoliclinico Gemelli 8 (12%) - - - No. centro Città PI Istituto 01 Meldola Ugo De Giorgi 02 Ravenna Claudia Casanova IRST IRCCS Oncologia Ospedale S.M. delle Croci 03 Rimini Valentina Arcangeli 04 Napoli Michele Orditura 05 Legnago 06 Carpi Lucia Longo 07 Reggio Emilia Alessandra Bologna 08 Biella 09 Napoli Sandro Pignata 10 Milano 11 Roma Oncologia, Osp. S.Maria Nuova Ospedale Biella TOT. Ricevuti: 349 24 (17%) 55 (16%) Sara Testoni [email protected] IRCCS IRST – Via P. Maroncelli 40 47014 Meldola (FC) Background x-tile 3.6.1 software (Yale University, New Haven, CT) internet – free http://medicine.yale.edu/lab/rimm/research/software.aspx