* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lecture 14a: Additional Remarks on Tuning Systems In previous
Figured bass wikipedia , lookup
Traditional sub-Saharan African harmony wikipedia , lookup
Consonance and dissonance wikipedia , lookup
Mode (music) wikipedia , lookup
Circle of fifths wikipedia , lookup
Microtonal music wikipedia , lookup
Equal temperament wikipedia , lookup
Math in Music Spring 2009 Lecture 14a: Additional Remarks on Tuning Systems In previous lectures, I’ve discussed tuning systems like just intonation and meantone tuning which were developed to solve problems with previous systems, each of which were widely used at some point in musical history. (In fact, just intonation and meantone temperament are still used today to construct keyboard instruments that are specifically dedicated to perform music from the Renaissance and baroque periods.) Collectively, these tuning systems might be called traditional Western systems. But the twentieth century has seen much more exploration of alternatives to these systems, derived either from mathematical analysis, from exploration of musical traditions of other cultures, or from “liberating” oneself of the assumptions behind Western tuning systems. I want to briefly describe the results of these explorations. 1. The 19- and 53-note equal temperament scales The 12-note equal tempered scale is based on the approximation 3/2 ≈ 2^(7/12) or, taking base-2 logs of both sides log_2(3/2) ≈ 7/12 How good is this approximation? log_2(3/2) = .5849625 while 7/12 = .5833333 Now, it follows from unique factorization into primes that log_2(3/2) is irrational; otherwise, if log_2(3/2) = p/q for integers p and q, then 3/2 = 2^(p/q) and 3^q = 2^(p+q), which is impossible unless p and q are zero. (Thus, we will never be able to express some number of octaves as a power of 3/2.) However, mathematicians have systematically studied the approximation of irrational numbers by sequences of rational numbers, and can produce such approximations by continued fractions. (A discussion of continued fractions is beyond the scope of this course, but you can find a good treatment in Benson section 6.2.) As the approximation gets better, the denominators of Math in Music Spring 2009 these rational numbers grow, which is problematic because the denominator (like the 12 in 7/12) is the number of notes you end up dividing the octave into. However, later in the sequence of approximations to log_2(3/2) there is a better approximation that has not too large a denominator: 31/53 = .58490566.. (The approximating sequence is shown on page 224.) This means that 53 perfect fifths is close to 31 octaves; equivalently, if we divide the octave into 53 equal steps, then 31 of these steps is close to a perfect fifth. How close? Well, 2^(31/53) = 1.49994, so that the difference between this and a perfect fifth (1.5) is about .07 cents. This approximation seems to have been known to the ancient Greeks. However, there are drawbacks to dividing the octave into 53 notes; Figure 6.3 shows the keyboard of a harmonium, built in the 19th century, tuned to a 53-note scale. Another approach is to try to construct an equal temperament system that gives a good approximation to some other just interval. For example, a just minor third is a ratio of 6/5=1.2, and in the 12-tone equal temperament system this is approximated by 2^(3/12) = 1.189. Because log_2(6/5) =.26303 while log_2(2^(1/4))=.25, these differ by about 15.6 cents. Now, a sequence of rational numbers approximating log_2(6/5) is given by 1/3, 1/4, 5/19, 111/422, … So, the next number along is 5/19 = .2631. If we write log_2(6/5) ≈ 5/19, this is equivalent to 6/5 = 2^(5/19); in other words, 19 just minor thirds is approximately 5 octaves. If we use this idea to divide the octave into 19 equal steps, then 5 of these steps differs from a just minor third by only about .15 cents. However, the approximation of the perfect fifth is slightly worse than in 12-tone equal temperament. The 19-tone system was advocated by the physicist Christian Huygens in the 17th century, and is still being explored by composers today. (See link on my web page for a sound sample.) Math in Music Spring 2009 Similarly, one can base a 31-note scale on approximating the meantone fifth 5^(1/4). 2. Expanding Just Intonation Another route that leads to an increased number of notes in the octave is to allow rational ratios involving prime factors greater than 5. (Recall that just intonation involves multiples only of ratios like 3/2 and 5/4.) Benson calls just intonation systems involving ratios up to and including p (where p is a prime number) “p-limit systems”. For example, we could get a 7-limit system by using the interval of 7/4, which might be called a just minor seventh, and comes from taking the 7th harmonic transposed down two octaves. The “major 7th chord”, which uses the root, plus a major third, fifth, and minor 7th above the root, is extremely common in classical harmony. In section 6.1 several examples of 7-limit system are given, together with an 11-limit system (dividing the octave into 43 tones) used by the American composer Harry Partch. There is also a 5-limit scale from classical Indian music, called the Sruti scale, which has 22 notes per octave (see Benson p.213). For example, the first 5 notes of this scale have ratios 1, 256:243, 16:15, 10:9, 9:8. Noting that 256/243 = 2^3 (2/3)^5, we see that the second note is exactly 5 perfect fifths down from first one, while the third note 16/15 is 81/80 times the second one. This means we can describe these notes in Eitz notation as C0, Dflat0, Dflat+1, D-1, D0