Download File

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

History of statistics wikipedia , lookup

Statistics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Assumption of normality
Slide 1
Assumption of normality
Transformations
Assumption of normality script
Practice problems
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Assumption of Normality
Slide 2



Many of the statistical methods that we will apply
require the assumption that a variable or variables
are normally distributed.
With multivariate statistics, the assumption is that
the combination of variables follows a multivariate
normal distribution.
Since there is not a direct test for multivariate
normality, we generally test each variable
individually and assume that they are multivariate
normal if they are individually normal, though this is
not necessarily the case.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Evaluating normality
Slide 3




There are both graphical and statistical methods for
evaluating normality.
Graphical methods include the histogram and
normality plot.
Statistical methods include diagnostic hypothesis
tests for normality, and a rule of thumb that says a
variable is reasonably close to normal if its skewness
and kurtosis have values between –1.0 and +1.0.
None of the methods is absolutely definitive.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Transformations
Slide 4



When a variable is not normally distributed, we can
create a transformed variable and test it for
normality. If the transformed variable is normally
distributed, we can substitute it in our analysis.
Three common transformations are: the logarithmic
transformation, the square root transformation, and
the inverse transformation.
All of these change the measuring scale on the
horizontal axis of a histogram to produce a
transformed variable that is mathematically
equivalent to the original variable.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
When transformations do not work
Slide 5


When none of the transformations induces normality
in a variable, including that variable in the analysis
will reduce our effectiveness at identifying statistical
relationships, i.e. we lose power.
We do have the option of changing the way the
information in the variable is represented, e.g.
substitute several dichotomous variables for a single
metric variable.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Problem 1
Slide 6
In the dataset GSS2000.sav, is the following
statement true, false, or an incorrect application of
a statistic? Use 0.01 as the level of significance.
Based on a diagnostic hypothesis test of normality,
total hours spent on the Internet is normally
distributed.
1.
2.
3.
4.
True
True with caution
False
Incorrect application of a statistic
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Computing “Explore” descriptive statistics
Slide 7
To compute the statistics
needed for evaluating the
normality of a variable, select
the Explore… command from
the Descriptive Statistics
menu.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Adding the variable to be evaluated
Slide 8
Second, click on right
arrow button to move
the highlighted variable
to the Dependent List.
First, click on the
variable to be included
in the analysis to
highlight it.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Selecting statistics to be computed
Slide 9
To select the statistics for the
output, click on the
Statistics… command button.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Including descriptive statistics
Slide 10
First, click on the
Descriptives checkbox
to select it. Clear the
other checkboxes.
Second, click on the
Continue button to
complete the request for
statistics.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Selecting charts for the output
Slide 11
To select the diagnostic charts
for the output, click on the
Plots… command button.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Including diagnostic plots and statistics
Slide 12
First, click on the
None option button
on the Boxplots panel
since boxplots are not
as helpful as other
charts in assessing
normality.
Finally, click on the
Continue button to
complete the request.
Second, click on the
Normality plots with tests
checkbox to include
normality plots and the
hypothesis tests for
normality.
Third, click on the Histogram
checkbox to include a
histogram in the output. You
may want to examine the
stem-and-leaf plot as well,
though I find it less useful.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Completing the specifications for the analysis
Slide 13
Click on the OK button to
complete the specifications
for the analysis and request
SPSS to produce the
output.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
The histogram
Slide 14
An initial impression of the
normality of the distribution
can be gained by examining
the histogram.
Histogram
50
In this example, the
histogram shows a substantial
violation of normality caused
by a extremely large value in
the distribution.
40
30
Frequency
20
10
Std. Dev = 15.35
Mean = 10.7
N = 93.00
0
10.0
30.0
50.0
100.0
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0
70.0
TOTAL TIME SPENT ON THE INTERNET
90.0
Expected Normal
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
The normality plot
Slide 15
Normal Q-Q Plot of TOTAL TIME SPENT ON THE INTERNET
3
2
1
0
The problem with the normality of this
variable’s distribution is reinforced by the
normality plot.
-1
-2
-3
-40
-20
Observed Value
0
20
40
If the variable were normally distributed,
the red dots would fit the green line very
closely. In this case, the red points in the
upper right of the chart indicate the
60
100
120
severe80skewing
caused
by the extremely
large data values.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
The test of normality
Slide 16
Tests of Normality
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statis tic
df
Sig.
TOTAL TIME SPENT
ON THE INTERNET
.246
93
.000
Statis tic
.606
Shapiro-Wilk
df
93
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Problem 1 asks about the results of the test of normality. Since the sample
size is larger than 50, we use the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. If the sample
size were 50 or less, we would use the Shapiro-Wilk statistic instead.
The null hypothesis for the test of normality states that the actual
distribution of the variable is equal to the expected distribution, i.e., the
variable is normally distributed. Since the probability associated with the
test of normality is < 0.001 is less than or equal to the level of significance
(0.01), we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that total hours spent on
the Internet is not normally distributed. (Note: we report the probability as
<0.001 instead of .000 to be clear that the probability is not really zero.)
The answer to problem 1 is false.
Sig.
.000
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
The assumption of normality script
Slide 17
An SPSS script to produce all
of the output that we have
produced manually is
available on the course web
site.
After downloading the script,
run it to test the assumption
of linearity.
Select Run Script…
from the Utilities
menu.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Selecting the assumption of normality script
Slide 18
First, navigate to the folder containing your
scripts and highlight the
NormalityAssumptionAndTransformations.SBS
script.
Second, click on
the Run button to
activate the script.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Specifications for normality script
Slide 19
First, move variables from
the list of variables in the
data set to the Variables to
Test list box.
The default output is to do all of the
transformations of the variable. To
exclude some transformations from the
calculations, clear the checkboxes.
Third, click on the OK
button to run the script.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
The test of normality
Slide 20
Tests of Normality
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statis tic
df
Sig.
TOTAL TIME SPENT
ON THE INTERNET
.246
93
.000
Statis tic
Shapiro-Wilk
df
.606
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
The script produces the same output that we
computed manually, in this example, the tests
of normality.
93
Sig.
.000
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Problem 2
Slide 21
In the dataset GSS2000.sav, is the following
statement true, false, or an incorrect application of
a statistic?
Based on the rule of thumb for the allowable
magnitude of skewness and kurtosis, total hours
spent on the Internet is normally distributed.
1.
2.
3.
4.
True
True with caution
False
Incorrect application of a statistic
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Table of descriptive statistics
Slide 22
Descriptives
TOTAL TIME SPENT
ON THE INTERNET
To answer problem
2, we look at the
values for skewness
and kurtosis in the
Descriptives table.
Mean
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
5% Trimmed Mean
Median
Variance
Std. Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Interquartile Range
Skewness
Kurtos is
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
Statis tic
10.731
7.570
13.893
8.295
5.500
235.655
15.3511
.2
102.0
101.8
10.200
3.532
15.614
The skewness and kurtosis for the variable both exceed the rule of
thumb criteria of 1.0. The variable is not normally distributed.
The answer to problem 2 if false.
Std. Error
1.5918
.250
.495
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Problem 3
Slide 23
In the dataset GSS2000.sav, is the following
statement true, false, or an incorrect application of
a statistic? Use 0.01 as the level of significance.
Based on a diagnostic hypothesis test of normality,
"total hours spent on the Internet" is not normally
distributed. A logarithmic transformation of "total
hours spent on the Internet" results in a variable that
is normally distributed.
1.
2.
3.
4.
True
True with caution
False
Incorrect application of a statistic
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
The test of normality
Slide 24
Tests of Normality
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statis tic
df
Sig.
Logarithm of NETIME
[LG10(NETIME)]
Square Root of NETIME
[SQRT(NETIME)]
Invers e of NETIME
[1/(NETIME)]
Statis tic
Shapiro-Wilk
df
Sig.
.047
93
.200*
.994
93
.951
.118
93
.003
.868
93
.000
.288
93
.000
.495
93
.000
*. This is a lower bound of the true s ignificance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Problem 3 specifically asks about the results of the test of
normality for the logarithmic transformation. Since our sample
size is larger than 50, we use the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
The null hypothesis for the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of normality
states that the actual distribution of the transformed variable is
equal to the expected distribution, i.e., the transformed variable
is normally distributed. Since the probability associated with the
test of normality (0.200) is greater than the level of significance,
we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the
logarithmic transformation of total hours spent on the Internet is
normally distributed.
The answer to problem 3 is true.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Other problems on assumption of normality
Slide 25



A problem may ask about the assumption of normality
for a nominal level variable. The answer will be “An
inappropriate application of a statistic” since there is
no expectation that a nominal variable be normal.
A problem may ask about the assumption of normality
for an ordinal level variable. If the variable or
transformed variable is normal, the correct answer to
the question is “True with caution” since we may be
required to defend treating an ordinal variable as
metric.
Questions will specify a level of significance to use and
the statistical evidence upon which you should base
your answer.
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Slide 26
Steps in answering questions about the
assumption of normality – question 1
The following is a guide to the decision process for answering
problems about the normality of a variable:
Is the variable to be
evaluated metric?
No
Incorrect application
of a statistic
Yes
Does the statistical
evidence support
normality assumption?
No
False
Yes
Are any of the metric
variables ordinal level?
Yes
True with caution
No
True
SW388R7
Data Analysis &
Computers II
Slide 27
Steps in answering questions about the
assumption of normality – question 2
The following is a guide to the decision process for answering
problems about the normality of a transformation:
Is the variable to be
evaluated metric?
No
Incorrect application
of a statistic
Yes
Statistical evidence
supports normality?
No
No
Statistical evidence
for transformation
supports normality?
False
Yes
Either variable
ordinal level?
Yes
True with caution
No
True