Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
INTRODUCTION • • Overview from Public Health (slides provided by Gemma Lyons) NICE Guidance 2015 (update from 2005) • GP direct access testing • What to do NOW and in the FUTURE Stand up if you have read the NICE Guidance INCIDENCE Rate per 100,000 population Directly standardised incidence rate of all cancers per 100,000 population, all ages, Camden and England, 2008-2013 1,000 Camden 900 England It is estimated that 6,000 people living in Camden have had a diagnosis of cancer 2015 On average, 824 people were diagnosed with cancer in Camden each year 2010-2012 800 700 600 500 The most common cancers in Camden are breast, prostate, bowel and lung cancer. 400 300 200 100 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Year Source: the National Cancer Intelligence Network’s Cancer Commissioning Toolkit, 2014 2013 INCIDENCE BY CANCER TYPE Age-Standardised Incidence rate by cancer type, 2012 250 Camden CCG England Rate per 100,000 200 150 100 50 0 Breast Lower GI Lung Cancer type Source: the National Cancer Intelligence Network’s Cancer Commissioning Toolkit, 2014 Urology Significantly lower incidence of urological cancer in Camden than England, after adjusting for the difference in age between the two populations. The other main cancer types show no significant difference with England. MORTALITY FROM CANCER IN CAMDEN Cancer deaths by cancer type, Camden 2011-2013 354 deaths (178 early deaths in people aged under 75 years) each year from cancer in Camden 2011-2013 Breast 27 Bowel 37 Prostate 19 Lung 81 Head Oesophagus and neck 14 12 Leukaemia 11 Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma 11 Ovary 9 Brain 9 Pancreas 18 Other 88 Cancer is the biggest cause of death in Camden 2013 Liver 18 Lung cancer is the biggest cause of cancer death, followed by breast and bowel cancer MORTALITY BY CANCER TYPE Age-Standardised mortality rate by cancer type, 2012 100 Camden CCG England Camden has the 12th lowest all cancer mortality rate out of 32 London CCGs, after adjusting for the differences in age. Rate per 100,000 80 Mortality rates for each of the major cancer types in Camden are similar to the national averages 60 40 – (see overall comparison on next slide) 20 0 Breast Lower GI Lung Cancer type Source: the National Cancer Intelligence Network’s Cancer Commissioning Toolkit, 2014 Urology MORTALITY FROM ALL CANCER, LONDON CCGS Rate per 100,000 500 Age-standardised mortality rate from all cancers, by London CCG, 2012 London average England average 400 300 200 100 Tower Hamlets Barking and Dagenham City and Hackney Hillingdon Southwark Islington Havering Wandsworth Greenwich Merton Lambeth Hammersmith and Fulham Waltham Forest Sutton Bexley Newham Lewisham Croydon Haringey Hounslow Camden Ealing Richmond Bromley Enfield Westminster * West London Redbridge Brent Barnet Kingston Harrow 0 London CCG * includes Kensington and Chelsea and Queen's Park and Paddington. Source: the National Cancer Intelligence Network’s Cancer Commissioning Toolkit, 2014 ONE-YEAR CANCER SURVIVAL RATE, LONDON CCGS One-year survival rate (%) of all cancers in people aged 15 and over, by London CCG, 2012 Percentage 100% England average 80% 60% 40% 20% Barnet * West London Harrow Westminster Richmond Hounslow Camden Kingston Merton Enfield Brent Bromley Croydon Sutton Bexley Wandsworth Hammersmith and Fulham Hillingdon Lambeth Haringey Lewisham Ealing Southwark Islington Greenwich City and Hackney Waltham Forest Havering Redbridge Tower Hamlets Newham Barking and Dagenham 0% London CCG * includes Kensington and Chelsea and Queen's Park and Paddington. Source: the National Cancer Intelligence Network’s Cancer Commissioning Toolkit, 2014 CANCER SCREENING - COMPARISON • Camden breast screening coverage declined in 2015 to be the lowest rate in London, at 56% % screening rate Screening rates in Camden, compared against London and England, Public Health Outcomes Framework, 2015 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Target Camden London England Camden London England Camden London England Cervical Breast Bowel Incidence, mortality & survival •Cancer is the biggest cause of death in Camden •Camden has the 12th lowest all cancer mortality rate out of 32 London CCGs, after adjusting for the differences in age •Cancer survival rates are improving in England and Camden Risk factors & prevention •43% of cancers estimated to be preventable •Main preventable risk factors are smoking, diet and alcohol •Deprived residents are more likely to have these risk factors •Public Health commissions lifestyle services to tackle these Screening & early diagnosis • Screening rates are lower than London average & below targets • Breast screening rates have dropped to lowest in London • National & local campaigns raise awareness of cancer signs/symptoms LARGELY THE SAME AS BEFORE (2005) • Haematological cancer • Breast cancer • Skin cancer: Dermoscopy if available to consider moles that don’t meet criteria for 2ww referral • Head & neck cancer: minor changes only e.g. community dentists can do 2WW MR X – 43 YEARS OLD ♂ Presents to the GP with crampy abdominal pain present for 4 weeks What would you ask? MR X – 43 YEARS OLD ♂ Presents to the GP with crampy abdominal pain present for 4 weeks What would you ask? 1. Urinary symptoms – no 2. Change in bowel habit - no 3. PR bleeding – no 4. Vomiting – no 5. Weight loss – yes 3kg in last month What would you do? MR X – 43 YEARS OLD ♂ Presents to the GP with crampy abdominal pain present for ? weeks What would you ask? 1. Urinary symptoms – no 2. Change in bowel habit - no 3. PR bleeding – no 4. Vomiting – no 5. Weight loss – yes 3kg in last month What would you do? 2WW (in the past for >40yrs rectal bleeding & looser stool for >3 weeks) CHANGES TO 2WW REFERRAL CRITERIA (I) Colorectal cancer suspected, 2WW referral if: Abdominal pain & unexplained weight loss 60yr+ Iron deficiency anaemia or change in bowel habit 40yr+ Unexplained rectal bleeding 50yr+ Turn to the person next to you and discuss which age matches which symptom CHANGES TO 2WW REFERRAL CRITERIA (I) Colorectal cancer suspected, 2WW referral if: Abdominal pain & unexplained weight loss 40yr+ Unexplained rectal bleeding 50yr+ Iron deficiency anaemia or change in bowel habit 60yr+ n.b. patients diagnosed at stage 1+2 have 97% chance of survival compared to 7% of patients with advanced cancer. For greater detail see: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG12/chapter/1recommendations#lower-gastrointestinal-tract-cancers CHANGES TO 2WW REFERRAL CRITERIA (I) Controversial: When logistics allow: Colorectal cancer suspected, 2WW referral if FOB positive for blood if<60yrs & iron deficiency anaemia or change in bowel habit Upper GI cancer suspected, direct access 2WW OGD NOT 2WW referral http://www.bmj.com/content/351/ bmj.h42560 For more detail: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG12/chapter/1recommendations#upper-gastrointestinal-tract-cancers MS A - 46 YEARS OLD♀ 7 weeks of IMB Stopped the POP one year ago Normal vaginal examination Would you refer on 2WW? MS A - 46 YEARS OLD♀ 7 weeks of IMB Stopped the POP one year ago Normal vaginal examination Would you refer on 2WW? NO – IMB has been taken out of 2WW referral criteria Gynaecological suspected cancer: 2WW referral if Post Menopausal Bleeding (LMP>12mths ago) CA125 + pelvic USS if ovarian cancer suspected (London advise simultaneously) Consider pelvic USS if 55yr+ with new unexplained vaginal discharge For more information: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG12/chapter/ 1-recommendations#gynaecological-cancers CHANGES TO 2WW REFERRAL CRITERIA (II) Suspected bladder cancer: • ≥45yrs & unexplained (no UTI) visible (macroscopic) haematuria or visible haematuria that persists or recurs after treatment of UTI • ≥60yrs & unexplained non-visible (microscopic) haematuria & either dysuria or ↑WBC on blood testing • Consider non-urgent referral for bladder cancer in people aged ≥60yrs with recurrent or persistent UTI. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG12/chapte r/1-recommendations#urological-cancers CHANGES TO 2WW REFERRAL CRITERIA (III) Suspected Lung Cancer, 2WW referral if: CXR findings that suggest lung cancer ≥40yr with unexplained haemoptysis (CXR same day as 2WW referral done) http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG12/chapter/1recommendations#lung-and-pleural-cancers “the proportion diagnosed through the GP 2WW referral route increased from 22% (2006) to 28% (2013)” “in 2006, 25% cancers diagnosed as emergency, in 2013 20%” GP INVESTIGATIONS (I) • Gastroscopy within 2 weeks if: • dysphagia OR aged ≥55yrs weight loss & any of dyspepsia or reflux • 2WW Abdominal CT scan to detect pancreatic cancer if: • over ≥60yr weight loss AND any of • diarrhoea/vomiting/back pain/abdominal pain/nausea/vomiting/new onset DM • Consider PSA blood test and rectal examination if: • lower urinary tract symptoms • new erectile dysfunction • visible haematuria GP INVESTIGATIONS (II) • CXR if ≥ 40yrs + 1 of cough/fatigue/sob/chest pain/weight loss/appetite loss if ever smoker, OR +2 of cough/fatigue/sob/chest pain/weight loss/appetite loss if never smoker • Consider CXR if persistent or recurrent chest infection/clubbing/raised platelets/supraclavicular lymphadenopathy or persistent cervical lymphadenopathy/chest signs consistent with lung cancer GP INVESTIGATIONS (III) • USS if suspect soft tissue sarcoma, x-ray if suspect bone sarcoma • MRI brain scan within 2wks (CT scan if MRI contraindicated) • New erectile dysfunction or urinary symptoms offer PSA SYMPTOMS • Individual symptoms may be from a number of cancers. Remember to look out for them e.g. • Appetite + weight loss - Positive Predictive Value • 4.3% any cancer • 2.3% lung cancer • DVT – Positive Predictive Value • 3.49% any cancer • 0.9% lung cancer WHAT CAN GPS DO NOW & WHAT IS TO COME? • • • • • • • If you suspect cancer, but 2WW criteria NOT entirely met, do still refer (use London Cancer 2WW form and state reason) Use CHOOSE & BOOK to get actual appointment when possible (better patient experience & fewer DNAs) When no appointments on choose & book, either email form or fax or defer to provider on choose and book Ensure patient AVAILABLE for appointments for 2 weeks & AWARE that is appointment for possible cancer Some GP direct access tests already available e.g. CXR, US, MRI Brain (must be within 2WW), PSA, CA125, TO COME: 2WW gastroscopy, 2WW CT scan abdomen GPs will need systems for follow-up of diagnostics CAMDEN SPECIFIC UPDATES • • • • • • • • Multidisciplinary Diagnostic Centre (MDC) Cancer joining Long-term Conditions Locally Commissioned Service Community pharmacy campaign Continued awareness raising amongst community groups Local media campaign New primary care facilitator – Christine Harding. GI audit has been reported on BMJ OnExamination Camden Specific Cancer modules are only available for one further year and you have to register before the end of this November if you want access – email [email protected] if you have lost your login details. LIFESTYLE PROGRAMMES FROM 1 APRIL 2016 All joint across Camden & Islington Smoking Cessation •One provider to deliver community smoking cessation across both boroughs Adult weight management & Exercise on Referral •One provider to deliver weight management & EoR •Cancer exercise programme incorporated into EoR NHS Health Checks •One provider to deliver community-based checks across both boroughs Christine Harding [email protected] 07826537310 Session (code) Details Length Delivery options Cancer data (GP1) Overview and discussion of local cancer data – including practice level data 30-45mins - Individual GP practice meeting - Cancer practice profiles emailed to practice Cancer decision support tools (GP2) New 2WW forms (GP3) New NICE Guidelines for cancer (GP4) Safety netting workshop (GP5) Introduction to using QCancer on EMIS Overview of guidance on new 2WW forms Summary of new guidance plus links to useful resources 30-40mins Individual GP practice meeting Individual GP practice meeting Individual GP practice meeting Winter 2015 2016 tbc Interactive workshop with scenarios covering communication; consultations, practice systems & coding 1hr 30mins - Group of practices - GP training practice Now SEA workshop (GP6) Interactive workshop including examples of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ SEAs; completing an SEA; case study examples; sharing learning from practice SEAs 1hr 30mins - Group of practices - GP training practice Now 30mins 30-40mins Date available Now Now GI AUDIT • Many patients are being seen regularly; this does not support the idea that access is a major barrier to cancer detection. • What is not clear is whether patients present the relevant symptoms or whether their clinicians are eliciting new & worrying symptoms when they are looking after a number of other conditions at the same time. • What is noticeable from the data about symptoms is that there appear to be a lot of patients who had no symptoms at all or only had 1-2 symptoms. Clearly this information is dependent on the detail in the original notes & the quality of the data recording but does suggest that patient awareness is critical & that clinicians need to be very alert to any possible suggestion of new symptoms. GI AUDIT II • • • • • In the patients with upper GI cancers progressive weight loss +/- dysphagia accounted for 60% of the cases. This accords with a recent audit in the RFH in which weight loss & dysphagia were the commonest presenting symptoms. In the lower GI cancers change of bowel habit+/- bleeding from back passage abdominal pain or constipation accounted for 66% of the cases. In the majority of cases these symptoms did not appear to have been of long duration & in most cases once these classic symptoms presented GPs were using 2WW protocols to refer patients. However the less specific symptoms of upper GI malignancy seem less likely to make patients attend & the first symptoms were quite late such as marked weight loss & dysphagia. Mild anaemia did not always result in a referral & there was no clear protocol for repeating tests. Follow-up of mild or vague symptoms was varied. There might be potential for developing a guideline for the management of patients who are NOT being referred on a 2WW pathway to ensure that they are followed up consistently& there is a low threshold for referral if symptoms persist. SUMMARY • Updates 2005 guidance • Based on patient symptoms not risk factors • Recommendations NOT requirements i.e. all referral forms need option for referral when cancer suspected outside criteria • Consider GP direct access to testing RESOURCES: Guidelines: Suspected cancer: Recognition and Referral http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng12 E-learning: BMJ Learning Quick tips: referral for suspected cancer - your summary of the 2015 NICE guideline (10 mins) http://learning.bmj.com/learning/module-intro/.html?moduleId=10053492 Pulse learning Key Questions live: NICE cancer guidelines http://pulse-learning.co.uk/clinical-modules/cancer/kq-live-nice-cancer Journals: Suspected cancer (part 1—children and young adults): visual overview of updated NICE guidance http://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h3036 Suspected cancer (part 2—adults): reference tables from updated NICE guidance http://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h3044 Toolkit: Macmillan Rapid Referrals Guideline http://www.macmillan.org.uk/Documents/AboutUs/Health_professionals/PCCL/Rapidreferralguidelines.pdf QUESTIONS? Camden CCG Cancer Clinical Lead: [email protected] Public Health and Screening: [email protected] 0207 527 1324