Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Solutions to Statistical Methods in the Biological and Health Sciences, by J. Susan Milton Exercises 6.7 1. Since we have a right-tailed test, the P-value = P(T19 > 3). Table VI tells us that P(T19 2.861) = 0.995 and P(T19 3.883) = 0.9995. Therefore, P(T19 > 2.861)=1-0.995 = 0.005 and P(T19 > 3.883)=1-0.9995 = 0.0005. Since our test statistic (to=3) falls between 2.861 and 3.883, our P-value must fall between 0.0005 and 0.005. That is, 0.0005 < P < 0.005. Based on the value of our P-value, we would reject Ho only if were greater than or equal to 0.005. 2. Since we have a left-tailed test, the P-value = P(T23 < -2). By symmetry of the T-distribution, P(T23 < -2) = P(T23 > 2). Table VI tells us that P(T23 1.714) = 0.95 and P(T23 2.069) = 0.975. Therefore, P(T23 > 1.714)=1-0.95 = 0.05 and P(T23 > 2.069)=1-0.975 = 0.025. Since 2 falls between 1.714 and 2.069, our P-value must fall between 0.025 and 0.05. That is, 0.025 < P < 0.05. Based on the value of our P-value, we would reject Ho only if were greater than or equal to 0.05. 3. Since we have a two-tailed test, the P-value = 2P(T15 > 1.5). Table VI tells us that P(T15 1.341) = 0.90 and P(T15 1.753) = 0.95. Therefore, P(T15 > 1.341)=1-0.90 = 0.10 and P(T15 > 1.753)=1-0.95 = 0.05. Since our test statistic (to=1.5) falls between 1.341 and 1.753, P(T15 > 1.5) must fall between 0.05 and 0.10, and thus our P-value=2P(T15 > 1.5) must fall between 2(0.05) and 2(0.10). That is, 0.10 < P < 0.20. Based on the value of our P-value, we would only reject Ho if were greater than or equal to 0.20 (which is a pretty high tolerance for a Type I error). 5a. H0: µ = 0.035% H1: µ > 0.035% 5b. n = 144 X̄ = 0.09% s = 0.25% t0 x̄ µ 0 s/ n 0.09 0.035 2.64 0.25/ 144 P-value = P(T143 > 2.64). Since n is large, use the last row in the T-table denoted by infinity () sign. That is, find P(T > 2.64). Table VI tells us that P(T 2.576) = 0.995 and P(T 3.291) = 0.9995. Therefore, P(T > 2.576)=1-0.995 = 0.005 and P(T > 3.291)=1-0.9995 = 0.0005. Since our test statistic (to=2.64) falls between 2.576 and 3.291, our P-value must fall between 0.0005 and 0.005. That is, 0.0005 < P < 0.005. Based on the value of our P-value, we would reject Ho if were greater than or equal to 0.005. 6. H0: µ = 6 H1: µ > 6 n = 16 d.f. = n1 = 161 = 15 X̄ = 6.15 s = 0.266 x̄ µ 0 6.15 6 Test statistic = t0 2.26 s/ n 0.266/ 16 So, our p-value is “how likely is it that we would observe a sample average more extreme than 6.15 if in fact the true average µ were 6?” Then translating the sample average to the test statistic, our p-value = P(T15 > 2.26) Using Table VI to calculate the P-value: Table VI tells us that P(T15 2.131) = 0.975 and P(T15 2.602) = 0.99. Therefore, P(T15 > 2.131)=1-0.975 = 0.025 and P(T15 > 2.602)=1-0.99 = 0.01. Since our test statistic (to=2.26) falls between 2.131 and 2.602, our P-value must fall between 0.01 and 0.025. That is, 0.01 < P < 0.025. Using Minitab to calculate the P-value: Cumulative Distribution Function Student's t distribution with 15 DF x 2.2600 P( X <= x) 0.9804 Minitab tells us P(T15 < 2.26) = 0.9804. Therefore, P(T15 > 2.26) must be 10.9804 = 0.0196. That is, our p-value is 0.0196. Our P-value tells us that it is very unlikely (P=0.0196 =0.05) that we would observe a sample average as large as we did if the true mean were 6, so we must reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the =0.05 level to conclude that the mean maximum effective range for the bat’s echolocation system is more than 6 meters. Minitab will also perform the hypothesis test directly for us by selecting “1-sample t” under “Basic Statistics.” Doing so, we get the following output: T-Test of the Mean Test of mu = 6.0000 vs mu > 6.0000 Variable Distance N 16 Mean 6.1500 StDev 0.2658 SE Mean 0.0665 T 2.26 P 0.020 7b. Test statistic: t0 x̄ µ 0 )/ n 5.3 5 1.37 1.2/ 30 Rejection region: Reject H0 if t0 1.311. Decision: Reject H0, since 1.37 1.311. 7d. Test statistic: t0 x̄ µ 0 s/ n 9.3 10 1.75 2/ 25 Rejection region: Reject H0 if t0 -2.492 Decision: Do not reject H0, since -1.75 ¾ -2.492. 7e. Test statistic: t0 x̄ µ 0 s/ n 5.1 6 1.50 3/ 25 Rejection region: Reject H0 if t0 -2.064 or if t0 2.064. Decision: Do not reject H0, since -1.50 does not fall in the rejection region. 8a. H0: µ = 10 H1: µ > 10 8b. n = 9 X̄ = 11 s = 1.94 d.f. = n1 = 91 = 8 Test statistic: t0 x̄ µ 0 s/ n 11 10 1.55 1.94/ 9 So, our p-value is “how likely is it that we would observe a sample average more extreme than 11 if in fact the true average µ were 10?” Then translating the sample average to the test statistic, our p-value = P(T8 > 1.55) Using Table VI to calculate the P-value: Table VI tells us that P(T8 1.397) = 0.90 and P(T8 1.86) = 0.95. Therefore, P(T8 > 1.397)=1-0.90 = 0.10 and P(T8 > 1.86)=1-0.95 = 0.05. Since our test statistic (to=1.55) falls between 1.397 and 1.86, our P-value must fall between 0.05 and 0.10. That is, 0.05 < P < 0.10. Using Minitab to calculate the P-value: Cumulative Distribution Function Student's t distribution with 8 DF x P( X <= x) 1.5500 0.9201 Minitab tells us P(T8 < 1.55) = 0.9201. Therefore, P(T8 > 1.55) must be 1 0.9201= 0.0799. That is our p-value is 0.0799. Our P-value tells us that the probability of observing the sample we did, if the true mean were 10, is 0.08. Therefore, if we compare 0.08 to =0.10, we must reject Ho, since 0.08 < 0.10. There is sufficient evidence at the =0.05 level to conclude that the mean maximum effective range for the bat’s echolocation system is more than 6 meters. (Note: that by setting = 0.10, it means we are willing to commit a Type I error about 10% of the time in this situation.) Minitab will also perform the hypothesis test directly for us by selecting “1-sample t” under “Basic Statistics.” Doing so, we get the following output: T-Test of the Mean Test of mu = 10.000 vs mu > 10.000 Variable Radiate N 9 Mean 11.000 StDev 1.936 SE Mean 0.645 T 1.55 P 0.080 Alternatively, we could use the rejection region approach: Rejection region: Reject H0 if t0 1.397. Decision: Reject H0, since 1.55 1.397. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the radiation has increased above the safe limit. Because we rejected H0, there is a possibility that we committed a Type I error. 9a. H0: µ = 2.5 H1: µ g 2.5 9b. n = 10 d.f. = n1 = 101 = 9 X̄ = 2.66 s = 0.20 x̄ µ 0 2.66 2.5 Test statistic: t0 2.53 s/ n 0.20/ 10 Rejection Region Approach: Rejection region: Reject H0 if t0 -1.833 or if t0 1.833. Decision: Reject H0, since 2.53 1.833. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the time to closure is different from 2.5 seconds. Because we rejected H0, there is a possibility that we committed a Type I error. Using Minitab to calculate the P-value: Cumulative Distribution Function Student's t distribution with 9 DF x P( X <= x) 2.5300 0.9839 Minitab tells us P(T9 < 2.53) = 0.9839. Therefore, P(T9 > 2.53) must be 1 0.9839= 0.0161. So, since we have a two-tailed test, our p-value is 2 × 0.0161= 0.0322. Our P-value tells us that the probability of observing the sample we did, if the true mean were 2.5 is 0.0322. Therefore, if we compare 0.0322 to =0.10, we must reject Ho, since 0.0322 < 0.10. There is sufficient evidence at the =0.10 level to conclude that the mean time from touch to complete closure is not equal to 2.5 seconds. (Note: that by setting = 0.10, it means we are willing to commit a Type I error about 10% of the time in this situation.) Minitab will also perform the hypothesis test directly for us by selecting “1-sample t” under “Basic Statistics.” Doing so, we get the following output: T-Test of the Mean Test of mu = 2.5000 vs mu not = 2.5000 Variable Time N 10 Mean 2.6600 StDev 0.2011 SE Mean 0.0636 T 2.52 P 0.033 10. H0: µ = 17 H1: µ < 17 n = 16 d.f. = n1 = 161 = 15 X̄ = 15.4375 s = 13.24 x̄ µ 0 15.4375 17 Test statistic: t0 0.47 s/ n 13.24/ 16 Rejection region approach: Rejection region: Reject H0 if t0 -1.753. Decision: Do not reject H0, since -0.47 does not fall in the rejection region. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the number of days has been reduced. (Because we did not reject H0, there is a possibility that we committed a Type II error.) Using Minitab to calculate the P-value: Cumulative Distribution Function Student's t distribution with 15 DF x P( X <= x) -0.4700 0.3226 Minitab tells us P(T15 < 0.47) = 0.3226. Since our test is left-tailed, our p-value is 0.3226. Our P-value tells us that the probability of observing the sample we did, if the true mean were 17, is 0.3226. Therefore, if we compare 0.3266 to =0.05, we do not reject Ho, since 0.3266 > 0.05. That is, it is not surprising to observe the sample we did, so there is not enough evidence at the =0.05 level to conclude that the mean number of days is less than 17. Since we failed to reject the null hypothesis, there is a possibility that we committed a Type II error. Minitab will also perform the hypothesis test directly for us by selecting “1-sample t” under “Basic Statistics.” Doing so, we get the following output: T-Test of the Mean Test of mu = 17.00 vs mu < 17.00 Variable Days N 16 Mean 15.44 StDev 13.24 SE Mean 3.31 T -0.47 P 0.32 Solutions prepared by Laura J. Simon, Pennsylvania State University