Download Exercises 6.7

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
Transcript
Solutions to Statistical Methods in the Biological and Health Sciences, by J. Susan Milton
Exercises 6.7
1. Since we have a right-tailed test, the P-value = P(T19 > 3).
Table VI tells us that P(T19 2.861) = 0.995 and P(T19 3.883) = 0.9995.
Therefore, P(T19 > 2.861)=1-0.995 = 0.005 and P(T19 > 3.883)=1-0.9995 = 0.0005.
Since our test statistic (to=3) falls between 2.861 and 3.883, our P-value must fall between
0.0005 and 0.005. That is, 0.0005 < P < 0.005. Based on the value of our P-value, we would
reject Ho only if were greater than or equal to 0.005.
2. Since we have a left-tailed test, the P-value = P(T23 < -2). By symmetry of the T-distribution,
P(T23 < -2) = P(T23 > 2).
Table VI tells us that P(T23 1.714) = 0.95 and P(T23 2.069) = 0.975.
Therefore, P(T23 > 1.714)=1-0.95 = 0.05 and P(T23 > 2.069)=1-0.975 = 0.025.
Since 2 falls between 1.714 and 2.069, our P-value must fall between 0.025 and 0.05. That
is, 0.025 < P < 0.05. Based on the value of our P-value, we would reject Ho only if were
greater than or equal to 0.05.
3. Since we have a two-tailed test, the P-value = 2P(T15 > 1.5).
Table VI tells us that P(T15 1.341) = 0.90 and P(T15 1.753) = 0.95.
Therefore, P(T15 > 1.341)=1-0.90 = 0.10 and P(T15 > 1.753)=1-0.95 = 0.05.
Since our test statistic (to=1.5) falls between 1.341 and 1.753, P(T15 > 1.5) must fall between
0.05 and 0.10, and thus our P-value=2P(T15 > 1.5) must fall between 2(0.05) and 2(0.10).
That is, 0.10 < P < 0.20. Based on the value of our P-value, we would only reject Ho if were greater than or equal to 0.20 (which is a pretty high tolerance for a Type I error).
5a. H0: µ = 0.035%
H1: µ > 0.035%
5b. n = 144
X̄ = 0.09%
s = 0.25%
t0 x̄ µ 0
s/ n
0.09 0.035
2.64
0.25/ 144
P-value = P(T143 > 2.64). Since n is large, use the last row in the T-table denoted by infinity
() sign. That is, find P(T > 2.64).
Table VI tells us that P(T 2.576) = 0.995 and P(T 3.291) = 0.9995.
Therefore, P(T > 2.576)=1-0.995 = 0.005 and P(T > 3.291)=1-0.9995 = 0.0005.
Since our test statistic (to=2.64) falls between 2.576 and 3.291, our P-value must fall between
0.0005 and 0.005. That is, 0.0005 < P < 0.005. Based on the value of our P-value, we would
reject Ho if were greater than or equal to 0.005.
6. H0: µ = 6
H1: µ > 6
n = 16
d.f. = n1 = 161 = 15
X̄ = 6.15
s = 0.266
x̄ µ 0
6.15 6
Test statistic = t0 2.26
s/ n
0.266/ 16
So, our p-value is “how likely is it that we would observe a sample average more extreme
than 6.15 if in fact the true average µ were 6?” Then translating the sample average to the
test statistic, our p-value = P(T15 > 2.26)
Using Table VI to calculate the P-value:
Table VI tells us that P(T15 2.131) = 0.975 and P(T15 2.602) = 0.99.
Therefore, P(T15 > 2.131)=1-0.975 = 0.025 and P(T15 > 2.602)=1-0.99 = 0.01.
Since our test statistic (to=2.26) falls between 2.131 and 2.602, our P-value must fall
between 0.01 and 0.025. That is, 0.01 < P < 0.025.
Using Minitab to calculate the P-value:
Cumulative Distribution Function
Student's t distribution with 15 DF
x
2.2600
P( X <= x)
0.9804
Minitab tells us P(T15 < 2.26) = 0.9804. Therefore, P(T15 > 2.26) must be 10.9804 =
0.0196. That is, our p-value is 0.0196.
Our P-value tells us that it is very unlikely (P=0.0196 =0.05) that we would observe a sample
average as large as we did if the true mean were 6, so we must reject Ho. There is sufficient
evidence at the =0.05 level to conclude that the mean maximum effective range for the bat’s
echolocation system is more than 6 meters.
Minitab will also perform the hypothesis test directly for us by selecting “1-sample t” under
“Basic Statistics.” Doing so, we get the following output:
T-Test of the Mean
Test of mu = 6.0000 vs mu > 6.0000
Variable
Distance
N
16
Mean
6.1500
StDev
0.2658
SE Mean
0.0665
T
2.26
P
0.020
7b. Test statistic: t0 x̄ µ 0
)/ n
5.3 5
1.37
1.2/ 30
Rejection region: Reject H0 if t0 1.311.
Decision: Reject H0, since 1.37 1.311.
7d. Test statistic: t0 x̄ µ 0
s/ n
9.3 10
1.75
2/ 25
Rejection region: Reject H0 if t0 -2.492
Decision: Do not reject H0, since -1.75 ¾ -2.492.
7e. Test statistic: t0 x̄ µ 0
s/ n
5.1 6
1.50
3/ 25
Rejection region: Reject H0 if t0 -2.064 or if t0 2.064.
Decision: Do not reject H0, since -1.50 does not fall in the rejection region.
8a. H0: µ = 10
H1: µ > 10
8b. n = 9
X̄ = 11
s = 1.94
d.f. = n1 = 91 = 8
Test statistic: t0 x̄ µ 0
s/ n
11 10
1.55
1.94/ 9
So, our p-value is “how likely is it that we would observe a sample average more extreme
than 11 if in fact the true average µ were 10?” Then translating the sample average to the test
statistic, our p-value = P(T8 > 1.55)
Using Table VI to calculate the P-value:
Table VI tells us that P(T8 1.397) = 0.90 and P(T8 1.86) = 0.95.
Therefore, P(T8 > 1.397)=1-0.90 = 0.10 and P(T8 > 1.86)=1-0.95 = 0.05.
Since our test statistic (to=1.55) falls between 1.397 and 1.86, our P-value must fall
between 0.05 and 0.10. That is, 0.05 < P < 0.10.
Using Minitab to calculate the P-value:
Cumulative Distribution Function
Student's t distribution with 8 DF
x
P( X <= x)
1.5500
0.9201
Minitab tells us P(T8 < 1.55) = 0.9201. Therefore, P(T8 > 1.55) must be 1 0.9201=
0.0799. That is our p-value is 0.0799.
Our P-value tells us that the probability of observing the sample we did, if the true mean were 10,
is 0.08. Therefore, if we compare 0.08 to =0.10, we must reject Ho, since 0.08 < 0.10. There is
sufficient evidence at the =0.05 level to conclude that the mean maximum effective range for
the bat’s echolocation system is more than 6 meters. (Note: that by setting = 0.10, it means we
are willing to commit a Type I error about 10% of the time in this situation.)
Minitab will also perform the hypothesis test directly for us by selecting “1-sample t” under
“Basic Statistics.” Doing so, we get the following output:
T-Test of the Mean
Test of mu = 10.000 vs mu > 10.000
Variable
Radiate
N
9
Mean
11.000
StDev
1.936
SE Mean
0.645
T
1.55
P
0.080
Alternatively, we could use the rejection region approach:
Rejection region: Reject H0 if t0 1.397.
Decision: Reject H0, since 1.55 1.397.
There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the radiation has increased above the safe limit.
Because we rejected H0, there is a possibility that we committed a Type I error.
9a. H0: µ = 2.5
H1: µ g 2.5
9b. n = 10
d.f. = n1 = 101 = 9
X̄ = 2.66
s = 0.20
x̄ µ 0
2.66 2.5
Test statistic: t0 2.53
s/ n
0.20/ 10
Rejection Region Approach:
Rejection region: Reject H0 if t0 -1.833 or if t0 1.833. Decision: Reject H0, since 2.53 1.833.
There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the time to closure is different from 2.5 seconds.
Because we rejected H0, there is a possibility that we committed a Type I error.
Using Minitab to calculate the P-value:
Cumulative Distribution Function
Student's t distribution with 9 DF
x
P( X <= x)
2.5300
0.9839
Minitab tells us P(T9 < 2.53) = 0.9839. Therefore, P(T9 > 2.53) must be 1 0.9839= 0.0161. So,
since we have a two-tailed test, our p-value is 2 × 0.0161= 0.0322.
Our P-value tells us that the probability of observing the sample we did, if the true mean were 2.5
is 0.0322. Therefore, if we compare 0.0322 to =0.10, we must reject Ho, since 0.0322 < 0.10.
There is sufficient evidence at the =0.10 level to conclude that the mean time from touch to
complete closure is not equal to 2.5 seconds. (Note: that by setting = 0.10, it means we are
willing to commit a Type I error about 10% of the time in this situation.)
Minitab will also perform the hypothesis test directly for us by selecting “1-sample t” under
“Basic Statistics.” Doing so, we get the following output:
T-Test of the Mean
Test of mu = 2.5000 vs mu not = 2.5000
Variable
Time
N
10
Mean
2.6600
StDev
0.2011
SE Mean
0.0636
T
2.52
P
0.033
10. H0: µ = 17
H1: µ < 17
n = 16 d.f. = n1 = 161 = 15
X̄ = 15.4375
s = 13.24
x̄ µ 0
15.4375 17
Test statistic: t0 0.47
s/ n
13.24/ 16
Rejection region approach:
Rejection region: Reject H0 if t0 -1.753.
Decision: Do not reject H0, since -0.47 does not fall in the rejection region.
There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the number of days has been reduced.
(Because we did not reject H0, there is a possibility that we committed a Type II error.)
Using Minitab to calculate the P-value:
Cumulative Distribution Function
Student's t distribution with 15 DF
x
P( X <= x)
-0.4700
0.3226
Minitab tells us P(T15 < 0.47) = 0.3226. Since our test is left-tailed, our p-value is 0.3226.
Our P-value tells us that the probability of observing the sample we did, if the true mean were 17,
is 0.3226. Therefore, if we compare 0.3266 to =0.05, we do not reject Ho, since 0.3266 > 0.05.
That is, it is not surprising to observe the sample we did, so there is not enough evidence at the
=0.05 level to conclude that the mean number of days is less than 17. Since we failed to reject
the null hypothesis, there is a possibility that we committed a Type II error.
Minitab will also perform the hypothesis test directly for us by selecting “1-sample t” under
“Basic Statistics.” Doing so, we get the following output:
T-Test of the Mean
Test of mu = 17.00 vs mu < 17.00
Variable
Days
N
16
Mean
15.44
StDev
13.24
SE Mean
3.31
T
-0.47
P
0.32
Solutions prepared by Laura J. Simon, Pennsylvania State University