Download Global gaps

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Competition (companies) wikipedia , lookup

Currency intervention wikipedia , lookup

Nouriel Roubini wikipedia , lookup

International monetary systems wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Globalisation and inflation:
New cross-country evidence on the
global determinants of domestic inflation
Claudio Borio and Andrew Filardo
Bank for International Settlements
13th Dubrovnik Economic Conference
29 June, 2007
1
Road map
Do we need new theories of inflation?
“Theory”
Empirical evidence
Policy implications and conclusions
2
Motivation
“Over the past two decades, inflation has
fallen notably, virtually worldwide, as has
economic volatility. Although a complete
understanding of the reasons remains elusive,
globalisation and innovation would appear
essential elements of any paradigm capable of
explaining the events of the past ten years”.
Alan Greenspan (2005)
3
Do we need new theories?
No & Yes
• No:
 Still, inflation is always and everywhere a
monetary phenomenon!
• Yes:
 Evidence is accumulating that the inflation
process is changing in various ways.
Today, we focus on the channels influencing
goods and services markets, from a top-down
perspective.
4
Stylised facts about global inflation
Also see, Ciccarelli and Mojon (2005), Mumtaz and Surico (2006).
5
Some stylised facts about globalisation
Direct and indirect channels important!
6
Some stylised facts – G10 wage shares
7
Inflation trend (BIS 2006)
Globalisation has…
… lowered the cost of disinflation
… helped moderate business cycles
… rewarded good policy frameworks
… reduced downward rigidities
… boosted central bank credibility
8
Inflation trend
Globalisation has…
… lowered the cost of disinflation
9
Inflation trend
Globalisation has…
… lowered the cost of disinflation
… helped moderate business cycles
… rewarded good policy frameworks
… reduced downward rigidities
… boosted central bank credibility
10
The cyclical component
11
The cyclical component
• What is the role of global factors in the domestic
inflation process?
• We know that the inflation process has changed
• To many central banks, domestic developments
might seem sufficient to explain the changes.
But are the domestic changes symptoms or are
they truly the causal factors?
• At this point, we are only starting to explore the key
implications – many daunting puzzles remain.
12
The “theory”
Country-centric vs globe-centric views
Country-centric view
Traditional view
- Phillips curve
- Domestic measures of slack matter
- Monetary policymakers have tight
control of the inflation process
13
Country-centric view
Key assumptions:
1. Textbook flexible exchange rates
or
2. Fairly closed economy
- Limited substitutability (across products and
factor inputs)
- To the extent that the tradable sector matters,
import prices are sufficient statistics
14
Globe-centric view
Globe-centric view
Newer view
- Traditional Phillips curve not well
specified
- Global measures of slack matter
- Monetary policymakers have much
looser control of the inflation process
15
Globe-centric view
Key assumptions:
1. Deviations from ideal flexible exchange rate
regime (though not necessarily a fixed
regime)
2. Globalised economy
- high substitutability across products
and/or factor inputs (Chen, Imbs and
Scott (2004))
- Global capacity constraints for goods and
factor inputs key
16
Exploring global output gaps
Several Key Findings!
17
Top-down methodology
Augmented Phillips curve approach
Inflation  f(economic slack)
What measure of slack is relevant?
Borio and Filardo (2007): “Globalisation and inflation: new cross
country evidence on the global determinants of domestic inflation”
18
Key findings
Country-centric benchmark specification shifting
 t  c   t 1  Gap   t
D
t 1
inflation constant
lagged
inflation
domestic
output
gap
Estimated country by country, for sub-samples (1980:Q1-92:Q4 and
1993:Q1-2005:Q3); CPI inflation; OECD output gaps
19
Declining importance of domestic gap
Sensitivity of inflation to domestic output gaps has fallen
20
Specification issue
Gi
U
D
 t   t  c   Gapt 1   Gapt 1   t
De-trended
inflation
constant
domestic
output
gap
global
output
gap
Far from perfect, but instructive and illustrative
21
Global gaps – measurement issues
5 different alternatives
Gi
Gap j 

kK
Gi
D
w j , k Gap
k
Weighted average of domestic output gaps
Various versions  eg trade weighted , FX weighted
22
Global gaps
Trade-weighted version – W1
W1
j,k
w

import
j,k
 export j , k
total imports and exports
j
23
Global gaps
Import-weighted version – W2
W2
j,k
w

import
j,k
total imports
j
24
Global gaps
Exchange rate-weighted version – W3
W3
j,k
w

f j,k
 f j,k
where
f j,k
  j,k  1 

exp 
m 

 2*
  j,k  1 

1  exp 
 m 
 j , k  correlatio n( US bilateral exchange rate for countries j and k)
25
Global gaps
Exchange rate adjusted trade-weighted version – W4
import
W4
j,k
w
j, k
 export j,k
total import  export

 (numerators)
 f j,k
26
Global gaps
GDP-weighted version – WG
WG
j
w

GDP j
World GDP
27
 t   tU  c  GaptD1
Pooled regression evidence:
Scatter plot with global gap
GaptW12
GaptW12
1985-2005
Now
1972-1992
28
Rising importance of the global gap
Pooled 16 OECD Countries
Coefficient on global gap
29
Rising importance of the global gap
Average of 16 OECD country-specific regressions
( )
30
Robustness to control variables
Accounts for traditional and non-traditional control variables
 t    ...   control variables   t
U
t
Domestic variables
 Import price growth
 Oil price growth
 ULC growth
Supply/cost
shocks
Global variables
Global unit labour costs
Global WPI
31
Global input prices and inflation – tight correlation
Inflation gap: de-trended CPI inflation, 16 OECD economies. Input prices: Composite JPMorgan Chase input price index
covering purchases of goods for manufacturing industries, and goods and staff costs for service industries; values above
32
(below) 50 indicate an increase (decrease).
Goods and services markets
Some evidence on sectoral markets:
The correlation of global measures of slack with manufacturing is
generally stronger than with services … as might be expected!
33
Tentative conclusions
 Prima facie evidence that we may need to think
in a less country-centric, ie more globecentric, way about the key determinants of
domestic inflation – direct and indirect
channels of influence important
 This may help to explain the deterioration of
domestic output gap estimates of late, and to
suggest ways to “fix” existing models
And, globalisation may be making domestic
monetary policy less effective!
34
Policy implications
1. Globalisation has altered traditional policy guideposts
Domestic slack has become less reliable
Global slack has become more important determinant of
domestic inflation
 Other dimensions of globalisation exacerbate these
changes – NAIRU, natural rate of interest
35
Policy implications
 Policy challenge:
-
relying too heavily on domestic slack can lead
policymakers astray
-
Looking forward – key risk is global spare capacity
and price stability. So far a safety valve.
-
But what next?
36
Policy implications
2. Financial globalisation complicates this
-
Financial globalisation has weakened the link
between policy rates and market rates
-
Room for manoeuvre may be shrinking
-
At the current policy juncture, this tendency may
have implications for financial imbalances
37
Current policy implications
Smooth sailing or impending crisis?
Money, Credit and Asset Prices
38
Mitigating the global implications
1.
Globalisation has altered traditional policy guideposts - improved
monitoring of external developments
2.
Renewed interest in boosting analytic efforts to understand the
many facets of globalisation
i. International business cycle models
•
Spillovers across national borders
•
Trade linkages as well as contestability
ii.
Top-down approaches rather than bottom up
iii. Global dimensions of the monetary policy transmission
mechanism
3.
Multilateral policy implications
39
Important puzzles – top-down approach
Specification issue & robustness
(BF)
(AR)
Gi
U
D
 t   t  c   Gapt 1   Gapt 1   t
Gi
D
 t  c   t 1   Gapt 1   Gapt 1   t
40
Conventional AR model severely bias!
20

15
AR
10
5
5
0
0
0.1
0.3
- - - “true” value
AR
BF
0.5
0.7
15
10
-0.1
 ,
20
0.5
0.7
0.9
-0.3
-0.1
0.1
conventional AR specification
0.3
B-F specification
Small-sample probability density function
41
more
Think globally! Act locally!
Thank you
42
References
Borio and Filardo (2007): “Globalisation and inflation: new
cross country evidence on the global determinants of
domestic inflation” and references therein; BIS Annual Report
(2006).
Recent speeches: Weber (June 2007); Kohn (March 2007),
Bernanke (March 2007)
Recent papers:
Pain, Koske and Sollie (2006)
Castelnuovo (2006)
Ihrig, Kamin, Lindner and Marquez (2007)
Razin and Binyamini (2007)
43