Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Running head: EXPERIENCE COGTITIVE ABILITY VERSUS BIOLOGICAL COMPETENCE IN Experience versus biological competence in cognitive ability There was long existing controversy; some people contended that cognitive ability depends on our biological aspects while other groups of people say that living experiences mainly influence the cognitive ability. However, dichotomy between the two does not seem to be reasonably explain the g. So in which way the g is well explained? And what is the intelligence? In the following parts of essay, the history of development of the definition of the intelligence, different models of intelligence and the implications of those changing meanings of intelligence in education will be discussed. In the last place, the relationship between properties of brain and intelligence, between experience and intelligence, and the experiences and properties of brain will also be explained. Development of the term aptitude Aptitude is one thing that stands among the controversy between that person’s ability is mainly influenced by the experiences and that other experts mention brains determine the extent how smart the children, rather than life experience. Aptitude is considered as a characteristic that can predict individual’s success in the future. People are usually confused by the term, aptitude, with other seemingly the same word; at the very first time, people notice the existence of the aptitude, aptitude is not the synonymous with intelligence in their minds. So, what is the aptitude? Actually, aptitude was not defined immediately; aptitude has its history of development until the meaning of intelligence becomes equal to the one what we know today, and in this development it has been evolving step by step. Broadly, the concept of the aptitude should be discussed from the very early ancient time. In the early 2357 BC in the china, ancient Chinese used competitive tests, such as intelligence 1 EXPERIENCE VERSUS BIOLOGICAL COMPETENCE IN COGTITIVE ABILITY and educational achievement tests, for selecting cognitively talented persons, named civil servants at that time. Also, among the Greeks in the ancient Greece, many great scholars applied different kinds of methods of teaching to instruct students who had different aptitudes. During the debate about clarifying the aptitude, gradually, people paid attention to the definition of aptitude in dictionary usages. The original definition of the aptitude in dictionary referred to fitness, inclination, tendency, propensity or suitability to perform well in a brand new situation in the future. According to Snow (2002), the historical concept of aptitude was really similar with the term readiness, whose definition in the dictionary was “Preparedness to respond a state or condition of the person that makes it possible to engage in a given learning activity”. However, this definition does not equal with the intelligence. The intelligence was believed as an organization of aptitudes for learning and problem solving, particularly in situations involving novel or complex, meaningful information and incomplete instruction about it. Likewise, Binet’s (1909) definition of aptitude or intelligence was deviated from formerly used concept of aptitude. He defined intelligence as performance on educational tasks, which might bring predictable power for achieving future success in education. After Binet’s new view on aptitude, subsequent theories on aptitudes were similar with Binet’s, though the focuses of theory were a little bit different. For example, the Gf-Gc theory of Cattell highly related with the education. Gf, also named fluid intelligence, referred to an ability to realize and analyze the relationships between stimulus and to comprehend the implications. Meanwhile, the Gc, called crystallized intelligence, meant accumulated knowledge which acquired via life experiences, and which is independent of central neural 2 EXPERIENCE VERSUS BIOLOGICAL COMPETENCE IN COGTITIVE ABILITY systems. The combination of Gc and Gf created a bi-dimensional structure of intelligence, which emphasized on the importance of education. Not only that, the three-stratum theory by Carroll and Horn’s theory combined with the Gf-Gc theory; CHC theory was the combination of the three. The CHC was the most validated theory due to its thoughtful consideration in many aspects. The first stratum consisted of over 70 elements. Second stratum included nine broad groups of factors, such as Gf, Gc and so on. Finally, the general ability was alone in the third stratum. Those elements in three stratums had critical relationships with educational tasks, whose focus was different with former focus of aptitude. Because more complicated and hence more correctly predict future performance in education, the hierarchical structure of general intelligence replaced with one-dimensional intelligence, the aptitude. The influence of experiences to intelligence In terms of experiences that influence the intelligence, this is the most important part in the essay. In spite of the other factor, brains, also is significant part in relation to intelligence, the experiences are something we frequently face in daily life and could maximize intelligence. Intelligence is plastic, rather than fixed as those who insisted the brain already made the intelligence fixed after maturation. Through various kinds of experiences, the intelligence will be changed, increased or decreased, with accumulated experiences. In the following parts, with prenatal experience, family experience, school experience, job experience, experience in old age, and nutrients and toxins, the significance of experiences will be discussed in details. Parental experience First, the prenatal experience influences the development of intelligence. According to 3 EXPERIENCE VERSUS BIOLOGICAL COMPETENCE IN COGTITIVE ABILITY results of a study of 40-week pregnancy, newborns showed extremely different intelligence when they exposed to between a nutritive environments and toxin environments. That is, prenatal experience could be affected by toxins, which might lead to trauma in subsequent life. Maternal exposure to the sedative Phenobarbital might diminish 7 scores in IQ tests. Environmental contaminants also had function in decreasing IQ. Family Experience Without any doubt, family is one of the biggest factors that influence the children. Something taught by parents and happened at home take the largest parts of children before they enroll into schools. Even after they are students at schools, the influence of parents is not negligible. There are also several aspects that contribute to the growth. The home environment impacts the cognitive development of children. An experiment showed that social economic status influenced children’s intelligence. According to Martinez (2000), “The values, expectations, child rearing practices, and other qualities of family life associated with social economic status may impact cognitive outcomes directly” (page 8). For example, the parents might talk with students in social linguistic patterns, which patterns relate to some social aspects of languages. Since those parents received higher educations and occupations, their knowledge about society would be broad and profound. Also, with that knowledge, children could be highly encouraged to think in social context, and hence more familiar with social patterns than those in lower social status do. And it is highly possible that those parents are genetically intelligent, which also lead to born smarter children. Not only the social linguistic patterns, daily interactions and parents’ education quality, play a significant role in promoting the development of the intelligence. What’s more, while other 4 EXPERIENCE VERSUS BIOLOGICAL COMPETENCE IN COGTITIVE ABILITY parents just mimic the words of teachers, parents in higher social status are able to teach children in various ways according to the same theory of teachers. The obvious difference in teaching produces large gaps between children in two families. One outstanding study that proved the power of social status was the adoption of the twins. Children who adopted into higher status families tended to have a higher IQ with the time passes, even though formerly their IQs were lower than their non-adopted siblings. School experience What the school experience provides to students is the educational treatments with which students improve their intelligence. Because the studies in the schools generally aim at improving students’ intelligence, ordinary experience of schooling will reasonably help students in increasing IQ. As the Ceci (1990) noticed that there are eight evidences to support his opinion that regular education has visible effects on intelligence development. The first one is strong and positive relationship between G measures and years of schooling completed. Education positively affects the aptitude development. The focus of the education was accumulating on the side of Gc than Gf and Gv; various courses broadened and deepened their knowledge. However, at the same time, it was not to saying that there were no effect on Gf and Gv; though more proofs needed to be presented, scholars still pretty made sure that the students improved at those two important aspects of aptitude. The second factor proved by Ceci (1990) was the retardation of students’ G deteriorated during the summer vacation when they did not study hard. Especially, for students in a lower social economic status had few chances, the retardation of intelligence was even obvious. The third one was irregular schooling resulted in increasing deficits in G. Late start of the 5 EXPERIENCE VERSUS BIOLOGICAL COMPETENCE IN COGTITIVE ABILITY schooling also had several kinds of negative effects on nurturing the G. Obviously, early determination of the regular education is also a big reason for retardation of the G. What’s more, the assessment designed to show the school achievement correlates with the measurement of the G. Additionally, the schooling has more effect on g than the age does. The last evidence is the overall intelligence increase of human. Throughout widespread effect of education and enhanced education quality produces this change. The Flynn effect also partly explains this phenomenon with the other factors, such as genetic and media, although the controversy about what makes this effect is still going on. Job experience The educational value of jobs are varied according to different sorts of jobs. For example, some jobs that produce commodities may tend to have less value in education than in symbolic analyst positions. Symbolic analyst positions are full of potentials to expand cognitive ability, because, rather than mindlessly repeat certain behavior, symbolic analyst jobs are focusing on analysis, exploration, judgment, independent thought, and initiative for solving some problems. With those focuses, intelligence can be evoked and practiced. For example, when a group of people plan to design a course in a school, each people may be responsible for different parts. For elegantly accomplishing their missions and efficiently helping the team, they have to use their intelligence to make synergy for the team. Experience in old age By getting old, the Gc will be accumulated as people learn and experience lots of things via life time. So, normally people say seniors have broad knowledge. However, the fluid intelligence tends to decrease as one gets older. 6 EXPERIENCE VERSUS BIOLOGICAL COMPETENCE IN COGTITIVE ABILITY However, one thing that shows the intelligence can be shaped by experience is that the fluid intelligence increases when the appropriate practice is complemented. The combination of cognitively interesting and challenging environment and physical exercise is able to produce brain molecule, named neurotrophins, which boost growth of neurons and brain vascularization. The more the neurotrophins, the more active the brain does. So, the Gf is increased by the increase of neurotrophins. What’s more, the new brain neurons can be made into the brain. It’s been commonly recognized that nothing impedes the loss of the brain neurons. However, new neurons can be created by environmental stimulation and exercise. Though the connections between certain activities and brain neurons need more evidences to prove its validity, the possibility seems to be captivating that human brain is able to renewal neurons by itself. Nutrients and toxins Nutrients and toxins have significant effect on changing human intelligence. For example, the Flynn effect partly can be explained by the nutrients. The increased nutrients were partly done by advanced supplement of food and nutrients in it. The reason why this opinion is plausible is that some developing countries in Africa are still lack of food and their IQs are not as high as those in economically developed countries. One important element in food, for example, is the Vitamin. In the Britain, there was 9 points IQ difference between those who had intake of multivitamin tablets and those who did not after 8 months’ trial (2000). Similar experiment and results also had found in California and New York City. So, how do the properties of the brain effects our intelligence? Correlation between brain and intelligence 7 EXPERIENCE VERSUS BIOLOGICAL COMPETENCE IN COGTITIVE ABILITY While there are people who agree the intelligence can be altered by the experience, the other groups of people say that the intelligence is just part of brain and merely can be changed by the experience. They think the intelligence is the product of human evolution, so the intelligence is highly related to organic variables. Those variables include, head size, brain size, frequency of alpha brain waves, latency and amplitude of evoked brain potentials, rate of brain glucose metabolism. The body size is related to the IQ. The correlation, based on a study (1998), is between +.10 and +.30. Moreover, interestingly, the leg length has more relationship with the IQ than the upper part of the body (page 146). In terms of head size and brain size, there are a number of evidences to support these two are significantly related to intelligence. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides really excellent capture the brain picture of living persons. According to this technology, many correlates between total brain volume and IQ in healthy persons have been successfully explored, correlations as high as +.40. What’s more, even though there are controversies, the brain size differences between sexes also produce differences in intelligence. There are three possible explanations about that. According to Jensen (1998), first one is sexual dimporphism in neural circuitry could make female’s brain functioning more efficiently. Secondly, the spatial visualization ability leads to this difference. Third one is though same amount of functional neurons in both sexes, the more “packing density” of neurons in female’s brains. However, those three are just hypothesis (page. 149). More evidences need to be presented for proving those hypothesis. The intelligence is also highly correlated with the cerebral glucose metabolism, which is 8 EXPERIENCE VERSUS BIOLOGICAL COMPETENCE IN COGTITIVE ABILITY the brain’s main source of energy. The rate of the cerebral glucose metabolism in different parts of the brains is the indicator of the extent how active is the mental activities. In other words, this rate and g have a high correlation in the studies of relationship between the two. For example, a study focused on the glucose metabolic rate (GMR) as a function of the “mental effort” paid in a task. Researchers organized some high and average IQ students to solve some easy and difficult problems. As a consequence, there are significant connections between the mental efforts with the problems. Average and high IQ students have mere difference of mental efforts in dealing with easy problems, while have obvious difference in dealing with difficult problems. That means, the higher IQ the students possess, the better they can resolve difficult problems than those who have relatively lower IQ. As I have discussed above, the head and brain size, frequency of alpha brain waves, evoked brain potentials and brain glucose metabolism have significant relationship with the g. That is true, since there are believable evidences that support their ideas. However, is it true that only the properties of the brains have correlation with the g? OR is it correct if someone says the experience is the only factor that influences the intelligence? Of course, these opinions are incorrect. Relationship between experiences, biological aspects and intelligence The three elements are mutually connected. Especially, the relationship between g and the other two factors are equally important. Though in the different time the importance may be varied, the functions of the experiences and the biological aspects always affect the intelligence together. For example, the maturation of the brain mainly increases the intelligence. Immature brains mean properties of the brains can not function as the adults’ 9 EXPERIENCE VERSUS BIOLOGICAL COMPETENCE IN COGTITIVE ABILITY brains. That is, biologically the brain restricts full abilities from working. So, for the adults whose brains just are mature after growing up, the maturation of the brains may indicate the most important promotion in the intelligence. However, in this case, negative experiences can wholly destroy the significant role of the maturation. For instance, if this adult, unfortunately, suffers car accident in the life experience, the brain may be damaged by this incident, which can forever impede the development of the brains. In this easily imaginable example, the argument can be existed that which element is more significant. However, no argument is expected from the fact that both of the two factors influence this people so much. Just like this example, in our life, two elements influence the g, and the two are always connected. Conclusion This essay mainly discusses the roles of life experience and biological aspects of persons, which may influence the intelligence. Before analyzing which one is more important, the changed definition of intelligence is mentioned from aptitude to multiple-structured intelligence. Because the intelligence is also related with the education, the reason why the development of intelligence is important is also analyzed. Then, each function of the two elements is discussed. Finally, I come to a conclusion that each factor is highly important to development of the g. The two factors are not only important, but correlated. If children need a stable development of the IQ, supports from the two aspects are both needed. 10 EXPERIENCE VERSUS BIOLOGICAL COMPETENCE IN COGTITIVE ABILITY References Binet, A. (1909). Les idles modernes sur I'enfant. Paris: Flammarion. Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American psychology, 12, 671-684. Ceci, S. J. (1990). On intelligence-- more or less : A bio-ecological treatise on intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice Hall. Harrell, R. F, Woodyard, E., & Gates, A. I. (1955). The effect of mothers' diets on the intelligence of offspring : A study of the influence of vitamin supplementation of the diets of pregnant and lactating women on the intelligence of their children. Columbia university Press. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor. New York, New York. Martinez, M. E. (2000). Education as cultivating intelligence. Mahwah, New Jersey. Snow, R. E. (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude experts. University of Stanford Press. Snow, R. E. (1996). Aptitude development and education. Psychology, public policy, and law, 2(3/4), 536-560. 11