Download The mathematics of digestion

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Digestion in the small intestine
Chris Budd, Andre Leger, Alastair Spence
EPSRC CASE Award with Unilever
What happens when we eat?
Stomach
Small intestine:
7m x 1.25cm
Intestinal wall:
Villi and Microvilli
Process:
• Food enters stomach and leaves as Chyme
• Nutrients are absorbed through the intestinal wall
• Chyme passes through small intestine in 4.5hrs
Intestinal wall
Stomach
Colon,
illeocecal sphincter
Peristaltic wave
Mixing process
Objectives
• Model the process of food moving through the intestine
• Model the process of nutrient mixing and absorption
Conclusions …
• Peristalsis is effective at mixing the nutrients
• It also acts to retard the mean flow of nutrient, allowing for
greater nutrient absorption in the first part of the gut
Basic model: axisymmetric flow pumped by a peristaltic wave
and a pressure gradient
• Chyne moves at velocity: u(x,r,t)
• Nutrient concentration: c(x,r,t)
• Peristaltic wave: r = f(x,t)

h = 1.25cm
r

Wavelength:8cm
x
r=f(x,t)
Decouple the system:
1. Calculate the flow u of the Chyme assuming Stokes
flow and long wavelength
2. Calculate the Nutrient transport and absorption
ct  u.c  D c on 
2
 D(n.c)  K a c on 
Approximations to the flow: I
7 Compartmental and Transit (CAT) Model
Degradation D1
Inflow
Absorption K1
Degradation D7
cn Outflow
INTESTINE
Absorption K7
Stomach
Degradation
Outflow
dcn
 U n 1cn 1  U n c n  K n cn  Dn cn
dt Inflow
Absorption
Approximations to the flow: II Macro-transport
Stoll et al (Chem Eng Sci 2000) ‘A Theory of Molecular
Absorption from the Small Intestine’
Approximate flow u by 2D Poiseuille flow and consider a 1D
equation for the average concentration C (Taylor,Moffatt)
 Dcr  K a c on 
2D:
ct  u (r )cx  D c
1D:
Ct  U C x  D C xx  K C on [0, )
2
*
*
*
Consider peristalsis as enhanced diffusion
a
D  D ,
D
*
D*  (100D )
Good news: Models are easy to use
Bad news: results are poor fits to the numerically
computed concentration profiles for complex peristaltic
flow
Better approach:
1. Use an asymptotic approach to give a good
approximation to the peristaltic flow velocity u in the
case of a small wave number
2. Identify different flow regimes
3. Use this in a numerical calculation of the
concentration c
• Navier Stokes
• Slow viscous
Axisymmetric flow
u
 (u.)u  p   2u
t
.u  0
ˆ    u  e ,   ˆ  p
• Velocity & Stokes
Streamfunction
    (e / r )  e
 
u     e 
r 
    (e )  0
1
L1   xx  rr   r  r  
r
L1  0
No slip on boundary
r  f ( x, t )  h   cos( 2 ( x  t ) /  )
FIXED FRAME
Change from
Impose periodicity
( x, r , t )
WAVE FRAME
( z  x  t , r )
• Amplitude:
Small
parameters
• Wave Number:

r
r
h



h
h

f ( zˆ )  1   cos( 2 zˆ)
ˆ  ˆ w ˆ rˆ  rˆ
1
rˆ
 2ˆ zˆzˆ ˆ rˆrˆ  ˆ rˆ  ˆ
1 ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
  zˆzˆ  rˆrˆ  rˆ  0
rˆ
2
Axisymmetry   0,  rˆrˆrˆ  0

z
z

Flow depends on:
ˆ  ˆ w
Flow rate
Amplitude


h
 0.6,
Proportional to pressure drop
 0
gives Poiseuille flow
h
Wave number
1.25cm
 
 0.16

8cm
Develop asymptotic series in powers of
2
Distinct flow types
• Reflux
pˆ   0
Pressure Rise
Particles undergo net retrograde
motion
• Trapping
Regions of Pressure Rise &
Pressure Drop
Streamlines encompass a bolus
of fluid particles
Trapped Fluid recirculates
Flow regions
pˆ  0
 (1   ) 2 / 4
A: Copumping, Detached Trapping
B: Copumping, Centreline Trapping
C: Copumping, No Trapping
A
B
ˆ w
Illeocecal sphincter open
C
E
D
pˆ  0
F
 (1   ) 2 / 4

Poiseuille
G
D: Pumping, No Trapping
E: Pumping, Centreline Trapping
Illeocecal sphincter closed
Case A: Copumping, Detached Trapping
Particle paths
Recirculation
Case B: Copumping, Centreline Trapping
Particle paths
x
Recirculation
Case C: Copumping, No Trapping
Particle paths
x
Poiseuille Flow
Case D: Pumping, No Trapping
Particle paths
x
Poiseuille Flow
Reflux
Case E: Pumping, Centreline Trapping
Particle paths
Recirculation
x
Reflux
Calculate the concentration c(x,r,t)
1. Substitute asymptotic solution for u into
ct  (u.c)  D c on 
2
 D(n.c)  K a c on 
2. Solve for c(x,r,t) numerically using an upwind
scheme on a domain transformed into a
computational rectangle.
3. Calculate rate of absorption
Type C flow: no trapping
Poiseuille flow
Peristaltic flow
Type E flow: trapping and reflux
Poiseuille flow
Peristaltic flow
Cross sectional average of nutrient
x
x
Location of absorped mass at final time
x
Nutrient absorped
Peristaltic flow
x
t
Conclusions
• Peristalsis helps both pumping and mixing
• Significantly greater absorption with
Peristaltic flow than with Poiseuille flow
Next steps
• Improve the absorption model
• Improve the fluid model (Non-Newtonian flow)
• More accurate representation of the intestine geometry
• Experiments