Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Marine Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction the need for a sustainable management and protection MATTHEW GIANNI CO-FOUNDER, POLITICAL AND POLICY ADVISOR DEEP SEA CONSERVATION COALITION THE NEED FOR GLOBAL OCEANS GOVERNANCE The future we REALLY want: A Greens/EFA conference on Rio+20 6 June 2012 UN Conference on Environment & Development Rio Earth Summit 1992 • • • • • • Major outcomes Framework Convention on Climate Change Convention on Biological Diversity Desertification Convention SIDs (Barbados Programme of Action 1994) Protection of the Marine Environment from LandBased Activities (UNEP Global Programme of Action 1995) 1995 UN Fish Stocks Agreement (Agenda 21 17.50) UN Fish Stocks Agreement Articles 5 and 6 General principles, precautionary and ecosystem approaches • Prevent or eliminate overfishing • Assess the impacts of fishing on the ecosystem • Minimize waste, bycatch, discards and the impacts of fishing on associated & dependent species • Protect biodiversity in the marine environment • Apply the precautionary approach widely • Be more cautious when information is uncertain, unreliable or inadequate • Protect habitats of special concern World Summit on Sustainable Development 2002 • Application of the ecosystem approach • Promote integrated, multisectoral coastal and ocean management • Maintain or restore stocks to levels that can produce the maximum sustainable yield with the aim of achieving these goals for depleted stocks on an urgent basis and where possible not later than 2015 • Significant reduction in the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010 WSSD 2002 • Eliminate subsidies that contribute to IUU fishing and to over-capacity • Maintain the productivity and biodiversity of important and vulnerable marine and coastal areas • Eliminate destructive fishing practices • Establish marine protected areas, including representative networks of MPAs by 2012 Three issues 1. MSY and preventing overfishing 2. Eliminating destructive fishing practices: deep-sea fisheries 3. New implementing agreement under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1. MSY & UN Fish Stocks Agreement • Prevent or eliminate overfishing • Establish precautionary “target” reference points for managing fish stocks • Establish “limit” reference points to constrain fishing within safe biological limits • Take into account uncertainty; be more cautious when information is uncertain, unreliable or inadequate • Ensure that reference points are “not exceeded” • MSY is a “minimum standard for limit reference points” Why the debate over MSY? • UNCLOS: Maintain or restore fish stocks to levels which can produce MSY (61.3, 119.1a) - adopted 1982, entered into force 1994 • UN FSA: MSY minimum standard for limit reference points; management target must be set higher adopted 1995, entered into force 2003 • CFP Reform 2012: MSY maybe by 2015 if possible? • EU credibility regarding political commitments and international law 2. Eliminating destructive fishing practices: deep-sea fisheries WSSD goal and UN General Assembly resolutions 59/25 (2004), 61/105 (2006), 64/72 (2009) and 66/68 (2011) Positive developments • Deep-sea bottom trawl bans in Azores, Madeira & Canary Islands (2005) • EU party to bottom trawl ban in Southern Ocean (2006) • Council Reg. 734/2008 to implement UNGA 61/105 largely complied with by Member State in SW Atlantic (2011) • Additional area closures to protect corals, sponges, seamounts in NE Atlantic & elsewhere (ongoing) 2. Eliminating destructive fishing practices: deep-sea fisheries However, much more still needs to be done. Key Opportunity 2012: • Review of the Northeast Atlantic Deep Sea fisheries access regime (Reg. 2347/2002) • Commission proposal due out soon • Require impact assessments & other elements of UN resolutions for all deep-sea fisheries • Phase-out destructive practices such as deep-sea bottom trawling and gillnet fishing Publications DSCC www.savethehighseas.org 1. & 2. Rio+20: the Future we want • Implementation of previous Summit commitments – ecosystem approach to fisheries – ending destructive fishing practices – fishing at levels consistent with the precautionary approach – eliminate harmful subsidies – end IUU fishing – other UN FSA/WSSD etc • Much of this is in the hands of Parliament & Council/Member States: CFP Reform 3. Rio+20: the Future we want Deep Sea Conservation Coalition, High Seas Alliance An agreement in Rio to initiate negotiation for a new high seas (ABNJ) treaty/implementing agreement under UNCLOS • High seas (areas beyond national jurisdiction) cover approximately 2/3rds of the oceans or 45% of the surface of the earth • Clear gaps in governance, implementation, regulation and enforcement in ocean areas beyond national jurisdiction • Need for overarching cooperation, coordination and implementation Gaps in Impact Assessments Spills & leaks Marine debris Deep seabed mining Waste disposal Credit: Greenpeace Fisheries Bioprospecting Invasive species Credit: Greenpeace New and emerging issues Ocean noise Open ocean aquaculture Co2 sequestration/Ocean fertilization Adaptation and mitigation to climate change Resource conflicts EEZ boundaries/sea level rise The problems of ocean space are closely interrelated and need to be considered as a whole Preamble to the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982) Credit: Scripps Institution of Oceanography, NOAA “Scientists have found 274 new species of corals, starfish, sponges, shrimps, and crabs 1.2 miles (2 kilometers) beneath the surface of the ocean around Antarctica…They also discovered 145 undersea canyons and 80 new seamounts” National Geographic News Oct 2008 (CSIRO expedition) Human impacts don’t recognize boundaries (c) Halpern et al. 2008. ‘Scientists found that almost no areas have been left pristine and that more than 40% of the world's oceans have been heavily affected.’ Species do not recognize boundaries Source: Tagging of Pacific Predators, McIntyre AD, ed. 2010. Blackwell Publishing, Ltd, Census of Marine Life 2010: Highlights of a Decade of Discovery. 50 % of the planet 64% of the ocean is beyond national jurisdiction 3. New agreement for marine biodiversity conservation in areas beyond national jurisdiction Implementing Agreement of UNCLOS • Establish global standard and requirement for EIAs and Strategic impact assessments • Representative networks of MPAs • Conservation, sustainable use, access and benefit sharing of Marine Genetic Resources Other elements? Implementing Agreement • Enhanced obligations: • Protection and Preservation of the Marine Environment including representative networks of MPAs and reserves • International Cooperation • Science-Based Approach to Management • The Precautionary and Ecosystem Approach including Prior EIAs, SAIs and cumulative impact assessments • Sustainable and Equitable Use • Public Availability of Information • Transparent and Open Decision Making Processes • Mechanisms for Monitoring, Control and Enforcement • State Accountability and Responsibility including Flag State Quick! Change course for Rio before its too late! Do they have any idea what they are going to talk about ? Ok boys! We need to rearrange the deck chairs for workshops. Who’s gonna pay for this? How many? One or two? Can we put the presentations on the web ? UNGA BBNJ WG Titanic Over 6 years of debate (UNGA BBNJ Working Goup) – now time for a decision Rio+20: the Future we want Deep Sea Conservation Coalition, High Seas Alliance An implementing agreement under UNCLOS Current draft text Para Oceans 6 (alt1): “We agree to initiate, as soon as possible, the negotiation, in the framework of the UN General Assembly, of an implementing agreement to UNCLOS that would address the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction” (similar to para 17.50 of Agenda 21 calling for UN FSA Conference) EU & G.77 ‘like-minded’ supportive but U.S., Iceland, Japan, Korea, Russia, Canada (Norway) opposed Thanks Hermione Project, Oxford-IPSO, INDEEP, IMARES, Pew Environment Group, Kristina Gjerde, Remi Parmentier, Lisa Speer and many others! www.savethehighseas.org