Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Role of Angiogenesis in Cancer and its j Therapeutic Implications Ming Kei Leo Li, Biomedical Sciences • • • • • Tumour angiogenesis: the growth of new heterogeneous blood vessels from existing blood vessels caused by chemical signals released by tumours and the infected host tissue Required for continued tumour proliferation and metastatic spread of cancer Supplies adequate oxygen and nutrient supply and removes waste products Triggered by overexpressed angiogenic factors or suppressed angiogenic inhibitors Correlation between breast tumour angiogenesis formation of leaky unorganized microvasculature and metastasis prompts scientists to study potential angiogenic treatments (illustrated in Figure 1) Drug Implications Discussion Results Introduction • • • • • • • Both microvessel count (p=0.003) and density grade (P≤0.001) correlated with metastatic disease (see Table 1) Invasive breast cancer patients mean count= 101±49.3 and mean density=2.95±1.00 Non-invasive breast cancer patients mean count=45±21.1 and mean density=1.38±0.82 Each increase in microvessel density grade is a 5.17 fold increase in risk of metastasis Each 10 microvessel count increase is a 1.59 fold increase risk of metastasis & a 1.17 fold increase risk of distant metastasis (p=0.029) Thus, angiogenesis is a good predictor/indicator of invasive breast carcinoma (see Figure 4) Results attributed to progressively poorly organized and permeable mass of microvessel development (see Figure 5&6) • • • Goal: Angiogenesis inhibitor drugs inhibit further proliferation of tumours by limiting resources needed for growth (see Figure 7) Most in phase I or phase II experimental stages Side effects: prolonged coagulation time, artery clots, hypertension and proteinuria Angiogenic Factor Antagonist • When inhibitors of angiogenic factor VEGF were injected into nude mice, results indicated decreased density of vessels and size of the tumours. (see Figure 8). Figure 7: Angiogenic factor antagonist strategies include (1) thinning of tumor blood vessel decreases vascular permeability, (2) inhibit VEGF receptor 1 or 2 to inhibit attachment of tumour cells to secondary sites and (3) prevent avascular micrometastases becoming macrometastases Figure 1: Shows increased permeability in tumors seen in leakage of injected red dextran dye from capillaries. • Methods • • • 30 patients with invasive breast carcinoma and 19 without metastasis investigated Each tumour’s highest neovascularization area had its microvessels counted and graded for density -counting technique: 200x field (see Figure 2) -density technique: criteria 1-4+ using immunoperoxidase technique dyed factor VIII for Scarff-Bloom-Richardson analysis Probability of metastasis measured by a logistic regression model (see Figure 3) Problem: The tumour stage during administration of AntiVEGF drug is critical, as more mature tumours express >1 angiogenic factors, resulting in resistance selection for colonies that produce non-targeted angiogenic factors. (see Figure 9) Figure 8: The impact of VEGF receptor Table 1: Shows tumor grade, size, age andmean microvessel count of cancer with metastasis and without metastasis. Figure 4: Shows correlation of prevalence of metastatic disease and microvessel count. Note there is 100% chance of metastasis in counts of more than 100 per 200x field. Combinational Therapy- Antigionegenic drug with inhibitors on the proliferation of tumour Chemotherapy in mice compared to control with only • potential to increase tumour cell exposure and response to VEGF. chemotherapy • normalization of vasculature allow better tumour blood perfusion and increase drug efficacy prolong usage leads to decrease blood flow and hypoxia, decreasing drug uptake Figure 9: Figure 8: Shows increasing angiogenic factors as breast cancer progresses. Figure 5: Shows capillary bed of normal Figure 3: Shows P= and neoplastic tissue probability of metastasis, X=vessel count at 200x, and A and B constant from the experiment (-2.614 and 0.0464 respectively). References 1. 2. 3. 4. Figure 2: Shows stain for factor VIII. Arrows indicate a single distinct microvessel (brown stain with clear space from adjacent microvessels, tumour cells and other connective tissue elements) 5. Figure 6a: Shows correlation between Figure 6b: Shows progressive 6. intensity of angiogenesis and invasiveness. recruitment of capillaries from tumor. 7. Cao, Y. (2004) ‘Antiangiogenic cancer therapy’, Seminars in Cancer Biology, 14(2), pp. 139–145. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2003.09.018. Devery, A., Wadekar, R., Bokobza, S., Weber, A., Jiang, Y. and Ryan, A. (2015) ‘Vascular endothelial growth factor directly stimulates tumour cell proliferation in non-small cell lung cancer’, International Journal of Oncology, . doi: 10.3892/ijo.2015.3082. Ma, J. and Waxman, D.J. (2008) ‘Combination of antiangiogenesis with chemotherapy for more effective cancer treatment’, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 7(12), pp. 3670–3684. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-08-0715. Nishida, N., Yano, H., Nishida, T., Kamura, T. and Kojiro, M. (2006) ‘Angiogenesis in cancer’, Vascular Health and Risk Management, 2(3), pp. 213–219. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2006.2.3.213. Tas, S.W., Maracle, C.X., Balogh, E. and Szekanecz, Z. (2015) ‘Targeting of proangiogenic signalling pathways in chronic inflammation’, Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 12(2), pp. 111–122. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.164. Weidner, N., Semple, J.P., Welch, W.R. and Folkman, J. (1991) ‘Tumor Angiogenesis and Metastasis — correlation in invasive breast carcinoma’, New England Journal of Medicine, 324(1), pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1056/nejm199101033240101. Weinberg, R.A. and Weinberg, R. (2013) The biology of cancer. 11th edn. New York, NY: GS Garland Science, Taylor & Francis Group.