Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Endocrine Notes Updates for physicians on practices, advances and research from Cleveland Clinic’s Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute 2012 Contact Us General Patient Referral 24/7 hospital transfers or physician consults – 855.REFER.123 (855.733.3712) Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute Appointments/Referrals 216.444.6568 or 800.223.2273, ext. 46568 Bariatric Surgery Appointments/Referrals 216.445.2224 or 800.223.2273, ext. 52224 On the Web at clevelandclinic.org/endonotes Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute Locations Main Campus 9500 Euclid Ave./F20 Cleveland, OH 44195 216.444.6568 Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute Diabetes Center 10685 Carnegie Ave./X20 Cleveland, OH 44106 216.444.6568 Ashtabula County Medical Center 2420 Lake Ave. Cleveland, OH 44404 440.997.6969 Cleveland Clinic Beachwood Family Health and Surgery Center 26900 Cedar Road Beachwood, OH 44122 216.839.3000 Cleveland Clinic Independence Family Health Center 5001 Rockside Road Crown Centre II Independence, OH 44131 216.986.4000 Cleveland Clinic Lorain Family Health and Surgery Center 5700 Cooper Foster Park Road Lorain, OH 44053 440.204.7400 Cleveland Clinic Solon Family Health Center 29800 Bainbridge Road Solon, OH 44139 440.519.6800 Cleveland Clinic Wooster Family Health Center 1740 Cleveland Road Wooster, OH 44691 330.287.4500 Lakewood Hospital Professional Building 14601 Detroit Road Lakewood, OH 44107 216.529.5300 Medina Hospital Professional Building 4087 Medina Road, Ste. 400 Medina, OH 44256 330.725.3713 Cleveland Clinic Stephanie Tubbs Jones Health Center 13944 Euclid Ave. East Cleveland, OH 44112 216.767.4242 Cleveland Clinic Strongsville Family Health and Surgery Center 16761 SouthPark Center Strongsville, OH 44136 440.878.2500 Cleveland Clinic Twinsburg Family Health and Surgery Center 8701 Darrow Road Twinsburg, OH 44087 330.888.4000 South Pointe Charles Miner Medical Building 20600 Harvard Road Warrensville Heights, OH 44122 216.295.1010 Cleveland Clinic Florida 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd. Weston, FL 33331 877.463.2010 Endocrine Notes Chairman, Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute James B. Young, MD Endocrine Notes updates physicians on clinical practices, advances and research from Cleveland Clinic’s Managing Editor Kimberley Sirk Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute. It is written for physicians and should be relied on for medical education Art Director Mike Viars purposes only. It does not provide a complete overview of the topics covered and should not replace the independent Marketing Bill Sattin, PhD Mary Anne Connor Endocrine Notes Cleveland Clinic Willoughby Hills Family Health Center 2570 SOM Center Road Willoughby Hills, OH 44094 440.943.2500 judgment of a physician about the appropriateness or risks of a procedure for a given patient. © 2012 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | 2 |2012 Dear Colleagues, I am pleased to present the 2012 edition of Endocrine Notes, in which you can read about the latest clinical innovations, emerging research and new treatment modalities within Cleveland Clinic’s Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute. The Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute is a part of Cleveland Clinic’s group practice model that brings related specialties together to provide integrated, patient-centered care. Collaboration among endocrinology; endocrine surgery; bariatrics, including bariatric surgery; and cardiology allows us to offer exceptional integrative, multidisciplinary patient care and novel discoveries. In this issue, you will learn more about our leading-edge innovation and research, including: • Details of a Cleveland Clinic study that identified increased mortality risk with sulfonylureas vs. metformin, while also demonstrating that glimepiride may be the preferred sulfonylurea for patients with underlying coronary artery disease • A mathematical model developed by our endocrine surgeons that can help differentiate normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism and secondary hyperparathyroidism • Five inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) pillars to adhere to when ordering and interpreting IPSS in patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome • Robotic bilateral posterior adrenalectomy for ACTH-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia causing subclinical Cushing syndrome • Highlights of our study that sheds light on the importance of screening for thyroid cancer in patients diagnosed with Cowden syndrome, including an online calculator that estimates a patient’s risk for PTEN mutation and the need for genetics consultation • Our study that found gastric bypass improves glucose homeostasis by attenuating the effect of ghrelin on ß-cell function • A proposed clinical algorithm targeting the management of residual diabetes following bariatric surgery • Our groundbreaking study, known as STAMPEDE, that continues to provide a wealth of information about our field, including the story we bring you here about how the benefits of bariatric surgery in type 2 diabetes extend to the improvement and prevention of nephropathy Throughout the Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute, our staff remains committed to Cleveland Clinic’s core ideology: Patients First. Our institute comprises: • The Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, which manages specialized centers of care for patients with diabetes, thyroid disorders and pituitary disorders • The Department of Endocrine Surgery, which performs the highest number of surgical procedures in the region • The Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, which has been designated as a Bariatric Surgery Center of Excellence by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Your comments and questions about Endocrine Notes articles are always welcome. Please feel free to contact me at 216.444.6568 or 800.223.2273, ext. 46568. Sincerely, James B. Young, MD Chairman, Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute Professor of Medicine and Executive Dean, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University George and Linda Kaufman Chair Physician Director, Institutional Relations and Development 800.223.2273, Endocrine Notesext. 46568 | 1 |clevelandclinic.org/endonotes 2012 Cleveland Clinic Study Identifies Increased Mortality Risk with Sulfonylureas vs. Metformin Kevin M. Pantalone, DO, and Robert Zimmerman, MD But Glimepiride May Be Safest Sulfonylurea In Cleveland Clinic’s Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes Texas, and they were published in Diabetes, Obesity and and Metabolism, we have identified an increased risk of Metabolism (see Suggested reading). overall mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with sulfonylurea vs. metformin monotherapy. In Robust data from a large patient population patients who do receive a sulfonylurea, our research found We conducted this retrospective analysis using the Cleveland that glimepiride may be the preferred agent in patients with Clinic Diabetes Registry, a repository comprising data on underlying coronary artery disease (CAD). patients with diabetes treated with oral anti-diabetic agents. We identified 23,915 patients with type 2 diabetes who We recently conducted a retrospective cohort study of nearly were seen at Cleveland Clinic between 1998 and 2006 who 24,000 patients with type 2 diabetes who were seen at received monotherapy with metformin (n=12,774), glipizide Cleveland Clinic, to assess the risk of overall mortality in (n=4,325), glyburide (n=4,279) or glimepiride (n=2,537). patients taking the most commonly prescribed sulfonyl- The patients were followed for mortality by documentation of ureas or metformin. In the entire population of our study, death within the enterprisewide electronic health record (EHR) which analyzed patients seen across eight years, glipizide, system and/or Social Security Death Index (SSDI) records. glyburide and glimepiride were all associated with a statistically significant >50 percent increase in mortality risk vs. There were a total of 2,546 deaths in 58,513 person years metformin. However, in those patients with documented CAD, of follow-up in the entire cohort, and 419 deaths in 5,980 a statistically significant increase in overall mortality risk person-years of follow-up in the subgroup with a history of was observed with glipizide (41 percent) and glyburide (38 documented CAD (n=2,721). Multivariable Cox models with percent) vs. metformin — but not with glimepiride. propensity analysis were used to compare cohorts. These results suggest that metformin is associated with a Cleveland Clinic is ideally suited to this type of study, given substantial reduction in mortality risk vs. sulfonylureas; thus, our large patient population with type 2 diabetes and CAD in the absence of contraindications, metformin should be and our multidisciplinary approach in treating a high volume the preferred first-line agent. In addition, these study results of patients within the Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute suggest that when a sulfonylurea is required to treat patients and the Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart & Vascular with type 2 diabetes, particularly those with underlying CAD, Institute. glimepiride may be the preferred/safer agent among the most commonly used generic sulfonylureas available in the United Practical clinical considerations States (glipizide, glyburide and glimepiride). The precise reason why glimepiride may be safer than the We presented the results of our study at The Endocrine Society’s 94th Annual Meeting, ENDO 2012, in Houston, Endocrine Notes other sulfonylureas in patients with underlying CAD remains unclear and requires further study. | 2 |2012 (A) Overall Mortality Entire Cohort Figures A and B. Overall mortality in the entire cohort (A) and subgroup with a documented history of coronary artery disease (CAD) (B), treated with sulfonylurea or metformin monotherapy the patient, it would seem inappropriate when no contraindications exist and adequate glucose control is not an issue to prescribe those medications that are associated with a higher risk of mortality. The results of this retrospective study are clinically significant for endocrinologists and primary care physicians who manage this patient population, especially in light of the fact that prospective, randomized controlled clinical trials comparing the mortality risk of these agents may not be a high priority given that the drugs are all available at bargain-basement pricing at local pharmacies. However, the sulfonylurea drug (B) Overall Mortality CAD Subgroup class remains a mainstay of therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes and is recommended as a tier-1, well-validated core therapy in the American Diabetes Association/European Association for the Study of Diabetes Consensus Treatment Algorithm. Therefore, randomized controlled clinical trials examining the mortality risk of various sulfonylureas, especially in patients with CAD, would provide endocrinologists and other physicians with evidence-based data — beyond expert opinion — to guide us in this area. About the authors Dr. Pantalone is an endocrinologist who specializes in the evaluation and management of diabetes mellitus, with a particular focus on type 2 diabetes. Dr. Zimmerman is Vice Chairman of the Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Director of the Diabetes Center. For more information, please contact Dr. Pantalone at 216.445.9060 or [email protected]. Dr. Zimmerman can Over the past few decades, research has suggested that the individual sulfonylureas differ considerably in terms of their pharmacologic properties, including: • Hypoglycemic risk • Sulfonylurea receptor selectivity • Effects on myocardial ischemic preconditioning (a cardioprotective phenomenon in which short periods of nonlethal ischemia help protect the myocardium from subsequent damage in the setting of recurrent ischemia) Some reports that have suggested that glimepiride, unlike other sulfonylureas, may be a mild insulin sensitizer. These differences in pharmacologic properties may translate into differences in clinical outcomes, including mortality risk. Because glipizide, glyburide, glimepiride and metformin are all readily available as generic agents at a similar cost to 800.223.2273, ext. 46568 be reached at 216.444.9428 or [email protected]. Suggested reading Pantalone KM, Kattan MW, Yu C, Wells BJ, Arrigain S, Jain A, Atreja A, Zimmerman RS. Increase in overall mortality risk in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving glipizide, glyburide, or glimepiride monotherapy vs. metformin: a retrospective analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14(9):803-809. Pantalone KM, Kattan MW, Yu C, Wells BJ, Arrigain S, Jain A, Atreja A, Zimmerman RS. The risk of overall mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving glipizide, glyburide, or glimepiride monotherapy: a retrospective analysis. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(6):1224-1229. Pantalone KM, Kattan MW, Yu C, Wells BJ, Arrigain S, Jain A, Atreja A, Zimmerman RS. The risk of developing coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure, and overall mortality, in type 2 diabetic patients receiving rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, metformin, or sulfonylureas: a retrospective analysis. Acta Diabetol. 2009;46(2):145-154. | 3 |clevelandclinic.org/endonotes Differentiating Normocalcemic Primary Hyperparathyroidism and Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Cleveland Clinic endocrine surgeons create mathematical model to clarify diagnosis With awareness increasing about primary hyperparathyroidism, clinicians are discovering that rather than one disease entity of high calcium and high parathyroid hormone (PTH), primary hyperparathyroidism presents across a wide spectrum. Just one year ago, endocrine surgeons at Cleveland Clinic described the new parathyroid disease entity normohormonal primary hyperparathyroidism (www.clevelandclinic.org/ endonotes2011). This is a presentation in which the patient’s calcium level is elevated but his/her PTH level is within normal range. In this article, I describe a new mathematical model developed by clinicians in Cleveland Clinic’s Department of Endocrine Surgery that can help clarify the diagnosis of another challenging disease presentation: normal calcium level with elevated PTH, or normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism (NCPHP). By Judy Jin, MD Overlapping biochemical presentation NCPHP can at times be confused with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Patients with 2° hyperparathyroidism (HPT) caused by vitamin D deficiency can present with a biochemical profile similar to patients with NCPHP: normal calcium level, elevated PTH level and low or low-normal vitamin D level. Because of the overlapping biochemical presentation, many patients with NCPHP may be diagnosed initially with 2° HPT; then, worsening osteoporosis despite treatment or recurrent kidney stones brings them back to the attention of endocrine surgeons. To facilitate the initial diagnosis of NCPHP, Cleveland Clinic’s endocrine surgeons proposed a mathematical formula that allows the calculation of a maximally expected normal PTH (maxPTH) level when taking into account the patient’s age and serum calcium and vitamin D levels (Table 1). When the serum PTH is higher than the calculated maxPTH, a diagnosis of NCPHP is suspected. This was a novel idea, so to test how well the formula performs, we conducted a retrospective study at Cleveland Clinic. Table 1 MaxPTH = 120 – 6 x Ca – 1/2 x VitD25 + 1/4 x Age Patient # Age Calcium VitD25 PTH maxPTH PTH>maxPTH Diagnosis 1 57 12.8 26 202 44 Yes 1°HPT 2 54 10.5 23 89 59 Yes 1°HPT 3 69 9.9 11 139 72 Yes 1°HPT 4 55 9.7 45 47 54 No 2°HPT This mathematical formula developed by Cleveland Clinic’s Department of Endocrine Surgery calculates the maximally expected normal PTH level when taking into account the patient’s age and serum calcium and vitamin D levels. When the serum PTH is higher than the calculated maxPTH, a diagnosis of normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism is suspected. Endocrine Notes We identified 477 patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2010 with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent surgery and were found to have abnormal parathyroid glands. Of these 477 patients, 66 were diagnosed with NCPHP. We reviewed these 66 patients’ preoperative biochemical profiles and tested whether our formula would have predicted primary hyperparathyroidism rather than 2° HPT. | 4 |2012 Figure 1 Figure 2 Serum Calcium Ionized Calcium Intact PTH 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D Phosphorus Magnesium Albumin Creatinine 1 1 Urine 24-hr Calcium 24-hr Creatinine This Cleveland Clinic-developed management protocol can help clinicians effectively triage patients to their correct disease group so that patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism aren’t inadvertently sorted into the normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism group based on the results of the mathematical formula. Patients should undergo this biochemical workup to help inform the primary clinician’s diagnosis, treatment plan and possible referral to an endocrine surgeon. Our retrospective analysis found that if the formula In order to use the decision tree, we asked that all developed by Cleveland Clinic’s endocrine surgeons had patients undergo a comprehensive biochemical workup been used as another diagnostic tool prior to surgery, it (Figure 2). The protocol then takes the clinician through a would have correctly identified all 66 patients to have review of the patient’s ionized calcium and vitamin D lev- NCPHP. Even in patients with coexisting vitamin D els and the calculated maxPTH level to identify the next deficiency, the formula was able to sort these patients management plan. This protocol clearly outlines when a into the NCPHP group and not the 2° HPT group. referral to the endocrine surgeon should be made. Furthermore, we found that even though patients with NCPHP had calcium levels in the normal range, they were often in the high-normal range, whereas patients with 2° HPT usually had mid- to low-normal-range calcium levels. The PTH levels in patients with NCPHP were significantly higher than those in patients with 2° HPT, despite similar vitamin D levels. Clinical management and referrals One drawback of the formula was that while it was very sensitive, it also sorted some patients with 2° HPT into the NCPHP group. Therefore, we have proposed a We are currently in the process of implementing this protocol in the offices of the primary care physicians and endocrinologists at Cleveland Clinic so that we may prospectively evaluate the efficacy of the management protocol when incorporating the maxPTH calculation. Our retrospective study found that if the formula developed by Cleveland Clinic’s endocrine surgeons had been used as another diagnostic tool prior to surgery, it would have correctly identified all 66 patients to have normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism. management protocol to help clinicians effectively triage About the author patients to their correct disease group (Figure 1). Dr. Jin serves as associate staff in the Department of Endocrine Surgery. For more information, please contact Dr. Jin at 216.445.3411 or at [email protected]. 800.223.2273, ext. 46568 | 5 |clevelandclinic.org/endonotes Five Important Pillars to Adhere to When Ordering and Interpreting IPSS in Patients with ACTH-Dependent Cushing Syndrome By Amir H. Hamrahian, MD; Ferdinand Hui, MD; Robert Weil, MD; and Laurence Kennedy, MD Although a pituitary adenoma is the most common cause of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent Cushing syndrome, the distinction from ectopic ACTH production can be difficult. This is because approximately 25 to 40 percent of pituitary microadenomas causing Cushing syndrome are too small to be detected by MRI, and also because about 10 percent of adults have (usually nonfunctional) microadenomas that are incidentally found on MRI screening. In the past two years, we have published two reports in Inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) is the gold standard test to determine the etiology of ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome. Clinical Endocrinology and Endocrine Practice concerning An inferior petrosal sinus to peripheral (IPS:P) ACTH ratio >2 the utility of IPSS and its interpretation in challenging cases of before or >3 after corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) admin- ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome (see Suggested reading). istration confirms a pituitary source of ACTH. Here we review the principles — referred to as the Five IPSS Pillars — that are key to the appropriate use and False-negative results, or the presence of Cushing disease interpretation of IPSS. To illustrate how the pillars can be in the absence of a diagnostic IPS:P ACTH ratio, may occur in up to 10 percent of patients and can be a source of confusion. In contrast, the presence of a false-positive IPSS — that is, used, we also share a report on a challenging case (see sidebar article). the test suggests a pituitary source of ACTH when in fact the source is ectopic or peripheral — is rare. Endocrine Notes | 6 |2012 The Five IPSS Pillars 5 Calculate prolactin-adjusted ACTH ratios. Prolactin- Based on our experience at Cleveland Clinic, we believe clinicians adjusted ACTH ratios may help to lateralize a corticotroph should adhere to the following principles for IPSS testing: adenoma and may have an impact on surgical outcome. While the utility of IPSS to diagnose pituitary-mediated 1 Do not perform IPSS before confirming the presence ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome is well-established, to of ACTH-dependent hypercortisolemia. The result of IPSS in a healthy volunteer or a patient with pseudo-Cushing may mimic the result in a patient with Cushing disease. 2 Confirm hypercortisolemia at the time of IPSS. Patients with cyclic Cushing syndrome may have a false-positive or false-negative IPSS result, depending on where the tumor is located and the degree and duration of eucortisolemia or hypocortisolemia between the hypercortisolemia episodes. We obtain a stat cortisol level in the morning the day that IPSS is planned and do not proceed with the IPSS if serum cortisol is <10 µg/dL. 3 Confirm catheter placement. Radiological confirmation of catheter tip placement during IPSS using venous angiography to demonstrate retrograde flow into the cavernous sinuses before sampling and by intermittent fluoroscopy during sampling may not be reliable, especially in centers with less experience with this procedure. At the same time, since there are collateral vessels draining to the inferior petrosal sinus (IPS), the aspirated venous sample from a properly placed catheter may occasionally come from a collateral vessel and may not accurately represent true pituitary venous efflux. We recently confirmed that the prolactin measurement during IPSS can reduce falsenegative results. Based on our data, if the IPS:P prolactin ratio is <1.3 and the corresponding IPS:P ACTH ratio is negative (i.e., <2 and <3 for pre- and post-CRH samples, respectively), the clinician cannot be sure that the negative result is valid. Others have recommended an IPS:P prolactin ratio >1.8 as an indication of appropriate IPS venous sampling. Currently, we have a dedicated interventional neuroradiologist perform all IPSS procedures. 4N ote that proper unilateral IPS venous sampling does not rule out a corticotroph adenoma in the contralateral side. As is illustrated in the accompanying case study, the patient had a tumor on the right side yet had appropriate IPS venous sampling only on the left side. Based on the presence or absence of collateral venous plexus to the contralateral side, the IPS on the contralateral side may not show a significant IPS:P ACTH ratio. 800.223.2273, ext. 46568 date the technique does not appear reliable for predicting precisely where within the pituitary — right, left, center — a microadenoma will be localized. A proposed criterion for localization indicates that an intersinus ACTH gradient of ≥1.4 before or after CRH stimulation is accurate in approximately 50 to 70 percent of cases. Variable patterns of venous drainage and catheter misplacement or improper venous sampling during IPSS are important factors that can lead to inaccuracy in lateralization of the tumor. We have demonstrated that the prolactin-adjusted ACTH ratio may be particularly useful when there is proper bilateral IPS venous sampling based on concurrent IPS:P prolactin ratios. In fact, no patient in our initial series of 14 patients — with the number now extending to about 20 patients — had a dominant prolactin-adjusted ACTH ratio (≥1.4) and a lesion on the opposite side of the pituitary gland. Such measurement could not be applied to the patient in the case study presented here because she had successful IPS sampling only on one side. We have encountered cases in which a pituitary adenoma has been found at neurosurgery contralateral to the side suggested by the prolactin-adjusted ACTH ratio; however, further meticulous pituitary exploration on the other side, prompted by the IPSS result, has uncovered a very small microadenoma on the side predicted by the ratio. If our data are confirmed by additional studies, the IPSS prolactin-adjusted ACTH ratio may conceivably be used to guide the neurosurgeon if hemi-hypophysectomy is to be performed. Finally, desmopressin has been used successfully in place of CRH in centers around the world, with similar diagnostic accuracy. Desmopressin is given as a 10-µg IV push; an IPS:P ACTH ratio >2 before and >3 after desmopressin administration is usually used to confirm a pituitary source. Considering that CRH cannot be obtained in this country at the present time, the use of desmopressin seems a reasonable option until CRH again becomes clinically available. In conclusion, IPSS is best performed by experienced hands, and adherence to the Five IPSS Pillars outlined here will increase the likelihood of successful localization and treatment of pituitary adenomas causing Cushing disease. | 7 |clevelandclinic.org/endonotes SIDEBAR: A Challenging Case: Applying the Five IPSS Pillars in ACTH-Dependent Cushing Syndrome A 30-year-old woman with progressive weight gain, fatigue, muscle weakness and skin changes suggestive of hypercortisolism was found to have the following biochemical results: cortisol after 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test, 44.8 µg/dL; 24-hour UFC, 824 and 3,515 µg (0-50); ACTH, 80 and 102 pg/mL (8-24). The pituitary MRI failed to reveal a pituitary adenoma. She was referred for IPSS, during which the neuroradiologist believed that he had achieved successful bilateral IPS catheter placement. The patient’s IPS:P ACTH ratio was <2 and <3 in all pre- and post-CRH samples, respectively (Table 1). The IPS:P prolactin levels indicated that the right IPS was not successfully catheterized or that the venous drainage did not represent IPS venous flux, as all the IPS:P prolactin ratios on the right side were <1.3. This, taken along with the robust ACTH response to CRH, which is reported in similar cases, suggested that the IPSS results were falsely negative and that the source of the ACTH was more likely pituitary than ectopic. The patient subsequently was found to have a right-sided pituitary adenoma, developed adrenal insufficiency postoperatively, and the tumor was stained positive for ACTH. The application of our Five IPSS Pillars for ordering and interpreting IPSS results, along with our clinical experience, guided us in diagnosing and treating the patient discussed in this case. Endocrine Notes | 8 |2012 Table 1 TIME min ACTH (pg/mL) RPS LPS P PRL (ng/mL) ACTH ratio RPS LPS P CORT (µg/dL) PRL ratio R/P L/PR/P L/P -10 79 89 73 1.101.2014.024.113.41.001.8029.1 -5 77 85 76 1.001.1013.128.612.51.002.2028.5 +2 108 117 83 1.301.4013.335.212.51.102.8029.7 +5 196 267 210 0.931.3013.638.811.81.203.3031.6 +10326 315 246 1.301.3013.034.613.30.982.6033.5 +15383 370 288 1.301.3013.734.912.71.102.7036.5 ACTH, corticotropin; PRL, prolactin; CORT, cortisol; RPS, right petrosal sinus; LPS, left petrosal sinus; P, peripheral; R/P, right petrosal sinus to peripheral ratio; L/P, left petrosal sinus to peripheral ratio Source: Mulligan et al. Endocrine Practice. 2011;17:1-17. About the authors Castinetti F, Morange I, Dufour H, Jaquet P, Conte-Devolx B, Girard N, Brue T. Desmopressin test during petrosal sinus sampling: a valuable tool to discriminate pituitary or ectopic ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;157(3):271-277. Dr. Hamrahian specializes in pituitary and adrenal disorders in the Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Dr. Hui is a neurointerventional surgeon and neuroradiologist in the Cerebrovascular Center. Dr. Weil is Section Head of Neuro-Endocrine Surgery. Dr. Kennedy is Chair of the Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and has a special interest in pituitary conditions. Machado MC, de Sa SV, Domenice S, Fragoso MC, Puglia P Jr, Pereira MA, de Mendonça BB, Salgado LR. The role of desmopressin in bilateral and simultaneous inferior petrosal sinus sampling for differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;66(1):136-142. For more information, please contact Dr. Hamrahian at 216.445.8538 or [email protected]. Dr. Kennedy can be reached at 216.445.8645 or [email protected]. Suggested reading Mulligan GB, Faiman C, Gupta M, Kennedy L, Hatipoglu B, Hui F, Weil RJ, Hamrahian AH. Prolactin measurement during inferior petrosal sinus sampling improves the localization of pituitary adenomas in Cushing’s disease. Clin Endocrinol. 2012;77(2):268-274. Mulligan GB, Eray E, Faiman C, Gupta M, Pineyro MM, Makdissi A, Suh JH, Masaryk TJ, Prayson R, Weil RJ, Hamrahian AH. Reduction of false-negative results in inferior petrosal sinus sampling with simultaneous prolactin and corticotropin measurement. Endocr Pract. 2011;17(1):33-40. Sharma ST, Raff H, Nieman LK. Prolactin as a marker of successful catheterization during IPSS in patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(12):3687-3694. 800.223.2273, ext. 46568 Findling JW, Kehoe ME, Raff H. Identification of patients with Cushing’s disease with negative pituitary adrenocorticotropin gradients during inferior petrosal sinus sampling: prolactin as an index of pituitary venous effluent. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(12):6005-6009. Swearingen B, Katznelson L, Miller K, Grinspoon S, Waltman A, Dorer DJ, Klibanski A, Biller BM. Diagnostic errors after inferior petrosal sinus sampling. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Aug;89(8):3752-63. Yanovski JA, Cutler GB Jr, Doppman JL, Miller DL, Chrousos GP, Oldfield EH, Nieman LK. The limited ability of inferior petrosal sinus sampling with corticotropin-releasing hormone to distinguish Cushing’s disease from pseudo-Cushing states or normal physiology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77(2):503-509. | 9 |clevelandclinic.org/endonotes Robotic Bilateral Posterior Adrenalectomy for ACTH-Independent Macronodular Adrenal Hyperplasia Causing Subclinical Cushing Syndrome Our patient was a 60-year-old man with bilateral macronodular adrenal masses These masses were incidentally identified on a CT scan ordered for abdominal pain in December 2011 in an outside hospital. He was referred to Cleveland Clinic’s Department of Endocrine Surgery within the Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute on February 15, 2012. At his office visit, the patient’s only complaint was a weight gain of 20 pounds over the past six months without any change in his dietary habits. By Eren Berber, MD On physical exam, the patient did not have any signs of Cushing syndrome. His BMI was 32.8. A CT scan showed bilateral adrenal masses with a macronodular appearance. The right adrenal measured 2 cm, and the left was 4 cm (Figure 1). The patient’s medical history was significant for hypertension and smoking. The preoperative laboratory workup was significant for ACTH-independent Cushing syndrome. The patient’s blood cortisol was 13.8 µg/dL, and his ACTH was less than 5 pg/mL (normal 8-42 pg/mL). His 24-hour urine cortisol was 104.8 µg/dL (normal <50) with a creatinine of 2.2 grams. Further dexamethasone suppression testing also supported an ACTH-independent adrenal pathology. same steps as on the contralateral side. The mass was Based on this workup, we diagnosed the patient with removed using a specimen retrieval bag inserted through subclinical Cushing syndrome due to ACTH-independent the 12-mm port site (Figure 3). macronodular adrenal hyperplasia. He provided consent for bilateral robotic PR adrenalectomy and was admitted to the hospital on the day of the surgery, May 29, 2012. We performed a bilateral adrenalectomy with a skin-toskin operative time of 268 minutes (98 minutes for the left side, and 170 minutes for the right side), including Surgical technique the docking times of 12 and 6 minutes, respectively. After intubation and administration of general anesthesia on Estimated blood loss was 50 mL. The patient was the gurney, the patient was flipped on a Wilson frame to the prone position on the operating room table. Initially, on the left side, we used three incisions placed below the 12th rib. We identified the adrenal mass using laparoscopic ultrasound. The robot surgical system was docked discharged uneventfully on steroid replacement on postoperative day 1, on May 30, 2012. The final pathology revealed bilateral adrenal cortical hyperplasia. The patient was seen for follow-up at two weeks with no evidence of complications. He continues to receive steroid replace- (Figure 2), and we resected the mass. Then we turned ment therapy. our attention to the other side. We made a 1-cm incision The choice of the posterior retroperitoneal approach was below the right 12th rib and entered the retroperitoneal helpful in this case, as this obviated the need to reposition space using an optical trocar. Then, we repeated the the patient to remove the mass on the contralateral side. Endocrine Notes | 10 |2012 Harmonic Scalpel 30° Scope Grasping Forceps Figure 2: Intraoperative photo depicting the position of the robotic system for the left side. Figure 3: Intraoperative photo showing the final appearance of the incisions. Figure 1: CT scan image showing bilateral adrenal masses. We believe that avoiding the abdominal cavity helped with Suggested reading the patient’s quick recovery. Use of the robotic system Karabulut K, Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Siperstein A, Berber E. Comparison of intraoperative time use and perioperative outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surgery. 2012;151(4):537-542. facilitated the procedure by providing a three-dimensional view and wristed instrumentation in a small space. This case also takes its place in the literature as the first bilateral posterior adrenalectomy that was performed robotically. About the author Dr. Berber is an Associate Professor of Surgery and Director of Robotic Endocrine Surgery in the Department of Endocrine Surgery, Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute. His specialty interests include minimally invasive and robotic endocrine and liver surgery. For more information, please contact Dr. Berber at 216.445.0555 or [email protected]. 800.223.2273, ext. 46568 Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Karabulut K, Siperstein A, Berber E. Robotic versus laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Surgery. 2012;151(4):537-542. Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Karabulut K, Mitchell J, Siperstein A, Berber E. Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of large adrenal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(7):2288-2294. Karabulut K, Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Siperstein A, Berber E. Comparison of intraoperative time use and perioperative outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surgery. 2012;151(4):537-542. Berber E, Mitchell J, Milas M, Siperstein A. Robotic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy: operative technique. Arch Surg. 2010;145(8):781-784. | 11 |clevelandclinic.org/endonotes Study Highlights Importance of Screening for Thyroid Cancer in Patients Diagnosed with Cowden Syndrome Plus: Access Cleveland Clinic’s Online Calculator for Estimating a Patient’s Risk for PTEN Mutation and Need for Genetics Consultation By Rosemarie Metzger, MD, MPH, and Charis Eng, MD, PhD At Cleveland Clinic, where endocrinologists and endocrine surgeons from the Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute work collaboratively with geneticists, researchers and other clinicians, referrals for thyroid screening are frequent among those with inherited cancer syndromes. One such example is Cowden syndrome (CS), a rare, dominantly heritable disorder that typically falls beyond routine recognition. Traditional aspects of care for CS patients have focused on the treatment of breast and thyroid cancer, both of which demonstrate increased incidence among CS patients. However, there has been evolution in the way that genetics professionals diagnose CS — and subsequently, a broader understanding of its associated disease spectrum, including CS-related cancers. Housed under the umbrella diagnosis of PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS), CS is one of several genetic syndromes, including Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome (BRRS) and Proteus-like syndrome, characterized by germline mutations of the tumor suppressor PTEN. These mutations predispose patients to benign hamartomatous changes (Figure 1) as well as malignant transformation of epithelial tissues, including breast, thyroid, kidney, intestine and endometrium. Although being PTEN mutation-positive imparts the ultimate diagnostic confirmation of CS, diagnosis can also be made on clinical grounds, as outlined by the International Cowden Consortium (ICC) Diagnostic Categories. Recognizing patients with CS is especially important given the frequency of associated cancers and the inherent implications for screening. Until recently, the exact magnitude and proportion of lifetime cancer risks in these patients were not fully appreciated. New data indicate that the lifetime risks in PTEN mutation-positive patients for breast, thyroid, endometrial, colorectal and kidney cancer, as well as melanoma, are elevated beyond those expected in the general Endocrine Notes Figure 2 population. Moreover, the lifetime risk of differentiated thyroid cancer for this group of patients is 35 percent. Given the importance of recognizing patients who potentially have CS and initiating appropriate cancer screening, a dedicated thyroid screening program was developed at Cleveland Clinic in 2007. Recently, we evaluated the outcomes of our thyroid screening program in PTEN mutation-positive CS patients and delineated the characteristics of both malignant and benign thyroid disease in this population. Study results The patient population for this study was derived from a large database of CS and CS-like patients that is part of a national multi-institutional study that is centrally coordinated at Cleveland Clinic by Charis Eng, MD, PhD, Chair and Founding Director of the Genomic Medicine Institute. For the purpose of our investigation, we looked at only those patients with a known germline pathogenic PTEN mutation (n=225). From the cohort of 225 patients, we identified 32 individuals (14 percent) with differentiated thyroid cancer. The median age at cancer diagnosis for the overall group was 35 years. Tumors were multifocal in 54 percent of patients and generally small (mean size, 1.4 cm). Distant (n=1) and cervical (n=2) metastases were rare. At the time of surgery for thyroid cancer, 25/32 patients (78 percent) had clinical and histologic evidence of goiter, and 16/32 (50 percent) had a background of Hashimoto thyroiditis noted on the pathology report. In patients with benign disease only, goiter was present in more than 70 percent, and Hashimoto thyroiditis in nearly 30 percent. Twenty-five of the 225 patients were seen and screened at Cleveland Clinic. Sixteen of these 25 patients underwent their first formal ultrasound screening or second opinion evaluation by endocrine surgeons at Cleveland Clinic. Nine (56 percent) of these 16 patients had ultrasound-evident thyroid abnor- | 12 |2012 These are examples of physical features characteristic of Cowden syndrome. Figures 1a represent trichilemmomas, flesh-colored hamartomas of the outer sheath of the follicle. They are typically found nearer to hairlines. Figures 1b show papillomatous papules: mucocutaneous lesions found on the face, oral mucosa and acral surfaces. Pictured here are papillomas of the gum and the tongue that represent benign epithelial lesions. The skin and gastrointestinal tract are the most common sites of hamartomatous change, but mucocutaneous features, including trichilemmomas and papillomatous papules, are estimated to have a 99 percent penetrance in CS by the third decade of life. malities consisting of multinodular goiter (n=6), Hashimoto thyroiditis (n=2) or both (n=1). Seven patients (44 percent) required thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration biopsy at the first office visit, which was abnormal in three patients (19 percent), leading to total thyroidectomy. Two of these (12.5 percent of the group of 16) were diagnosed with thyroid cancer, unsuspected prior to screening. We recently developed a risk calculator at Cleveland Clinic to estimate the possibility of CS. You can access this clinical tool online at lerner.ccf.org/gmi/ccscore/ to facilitate identifying patients who will benefit from genetics consultation. About the authors Clinical applications Based on our findings, PTEN mutation-positive patients with CS have an increased prevalence of thyroid disease, both malignant and benign, and it occurs much sooner than is widely appreciated. Data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registry indicate that the median age at thyroid cancer diagnosis in the general population is 49 years. The onset of thyroid cancer by the middle of the third decade in this PTEN mutation-positive population is striking in comparison. Screening for thyroid disease is therefore advisable at the time of diagnosis, regardless of age, and preferably by dedicated thyroid specialists. Thyroid surgery, if needed, should be a total thyroidectomy. This makes sense biologically, since the hereditary process places the entire thyroid tissue at risk. Furthermore, this approach avoids multiple partial resections and repeat surgeries, which are riskier procedures. Although CS may be somewhat difficult to recognize, the implications are so valuable that it is a worthwhile investment of effort and vigilance. PTEN mutation-positive patients are at risk for multiple cancer diagnoses, and increased screening is recommended to decrease the resultant morbidity and mortality from disease. The challenge is to notice the subtleties and hints of something unusual — the recognition of kidney and endometrial cancers, for instance. Unfortunately, skin findings can be difficult to recognize, and biopsy is needed to properly identify a trichilemmoma (Figure 1). Oral papillomas may be more discernible and certainly can be incorporated into a head and neck exam, as could measurement of head circumference (Figure 2). 800.223.2273, ext. 46568 Dr. Metzger is an endocrine surgeon in the Department of Endocrine Surgery who specializes in the thyroid and parathyroid. Dr. Eng is Chair and Founding Director of the Genomic Medicine Institute. For more information, please contact Dr. Metzger at 216.445.3695 or [email protected]. Suggested reading Eng C. Will the real Cowden syndrome please stand up: revised diagnostic criteria. J Med Genet. 2000;37:828-830. Tan MH, Mester JL, Ngeow J, Rybicki LA, Orloff MS, Eng C. Lifetime cancer risks in individuals with germline PTEN mutations. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(2):400-407. Ngeow J, Mester J, Rybicki LA, Ni Y, Milas M, Eng C. Incidence and clinical characteristics of thyroid cancer in prospective series of individuals with Cowden and Cowden-like syndrome characterized by germline PTEN, SDH, or KLLN alterations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(12):E2063-E2071. Milas M, Mester J, Metzger R. Should patients with Cowden syndrome undergo prophylactic thyroidectomy? Surgery. 2012; 152(6):1201-1210. National Cancer Institute Web site. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer statistics. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov. Tan MH, Mester J, Peterson C, Yang Y, Chen JL, Rybicki LA. A clinical scoring system for selection of patients for PTEN mutation testing is proposed on the basis of a prospective study of 3042 probands. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88(1):42-56. | 13 |clevelandclinic.org/endonotes Proposed Clinical Algorithm Targets the Management of Residual Diabetes Following Bariatric Surgery By Sangeeta Rao Kashyap, MD, and Philip R. Schauer, MD Numerous observational studies have documented the positive metabolic effects of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients with type 2 diabetes. However, despite initial weight loss, 25 to 40 percent of bariatric surgery patients improve glycemic control but do not necessarily achieve “biochemical remission” of hyperglycemia. Some achieve normal glycemic control (HbA1c <6 percent or <42 mmol/mol) initially but relapse later while others never quite reach normal blood sugar levels. Based on our experience, we have proposed a clinical advanced stages of the disease, and experience inadequate algorithm for the long-term management of residual diabetes weight loss and regain weight. Other factors associated with following bariatric surgery in the absence and presence of suboptimal diabetes control following bariatric procedures are weight regain. Our clinical approach, which is based on insulin use, male gender, lower preoperative BMI, severity of established pathophysiological effects of these procedures preoperative ß-cell function (i.e., hyperglycemia) and poten- on diabetes remission, was published in Diabetes, Obesity tially inadequate incretin stimulation following surgery. and Metabolism in 2012 (14:773-779). Therapies for residual diabetes Cleveland Clinic’s Bariatric & Metabolic Institute is fully Nonremission of hyperglycemia is indicated by an HbA1c level integrated within the broader Endocrinology & Metabolism >7 percent or 53 mmol/mol that requires the use of anti- Institute. As such, the patient’s endocrinologist, as part diabetic medications. Targeting weight regain and poor residual of a multidisciplinary obesity team, plays a key role in our pancreatic ß-cell function with insulin may be indicated by du- bariatric surgery center of excellence and other settings in ration of diabetes >10 years, insulin use, poor glycemic control the long-term treatment, evaluation and monitoring of post- on oral agents and microvascular complications. bariatric surgery patients with type 2 diabetes. Of specific importance is the need to monitor comorbidity status, Gastric restrictive procedures weight regain and nutritional deficiencies. In patients who have had gastric restrictive procedures, Diabetes nonremission or re-emergence nonremission is indicated when patients have inadequate Residual diabetes occurs more commonly following gastric re- weight loss or weight regain and progressive ß-cell failure strictive (i.e., laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding [LAGB] without weight regain. The management of residual type 2 and sleeve gastrectomy) procedures vs. intestinal bypass (i.e., diabetes due to insulin resistance and/or insulin secretion Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB] and biliopancreatic diver- defects in these patients should focus on weight loss and sion [BPD]) surgeries. Patients who undergo gastric bypass glycemic control with anti-diabetic medications that have and BPD procedures improve sooner and maintain glucose weight-negative or -neutral effects. Metformin remains the control for longer periods than do patients treated by banding first-line agent in this context due to its mechanism of ac- or sleeve gastrectomy procedures. Additionally, patients who tion that improves insulin sensitivity by suppressing hepatic do not achieve biochemical remission or who experience a gluconeogenesis and increasing muscle/liver glucose uptake re-emergence often have diabetes duration >10 years, are in through increased AMPK activity. Endocrine Notes | 14 |2012 Caution should be exercised in these patients when con- GLP-agonists) in bariatric patients is lacking. Studies have sidering sulphonylureas in the early postoperative period, demonstrated that these agents enhance glucose-dependent because they may precipitate hypoglycemia and trigger insulin secretion and offer advantages for weight loss in dumping syndromes. In patients who experience suboptimal obese type 2 diabetes patients. Because incretin stimulation glycemic control several years after gastric restrictive surgery, of insulin secretion following gastric bypass helps improve the addition of a sulphonylurea to metformin could enhance glucose levels, the role of GLP-1 analogues in post-bariatric insulin secretion and restore glycemic control by targeting surgery patients must be further defined. ß-cell failure. Patients who do not respond to this therapy The pathophysiology underlying diabetes relapse following should be prescribed basal insulin; if glycemic control is not various bariatric surgery procedures is complex. Enhancing adequate, then prandial insulin should be added. our understanding in this area will inform further research Revisional bariatric surgery is indicated primarily for patients and treatment options. with anatomical/mechanical issues or severe nutritional Continued monitoring of long-term diabetes complications deficiencies and patients whose comorbid conditions worsen is essential following bariatric surgery, regardless of initial following LAGB or sleeve gastrectomy. remission status. Intestinal bypass procedures About the authors At our institution, we observed 12 months following RYGB Dr. Kashyap is an endocrinologist in the Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute and Assistant Professor of Medicine at Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine. Dr. Schauer is Professor of Surgery and Director of Cleveland Clinic’s Bariatric & Metabolic Institute. that obese patients with type 2 diabetes experienced a greater than fourfold improvement in insulin sensitivity and a 10-fold increase in ß-cell function with mixed meal testing (unpublished data). These improvements were not seen in patients who underwent gastric-restrictive procedures, even For more information, please contact Dr. Kashyap at when they had significant weight loss. 216.445.2679 or [email protected]. Dr. Schauer can be reached at 216.444.4794 or [email protected]. In patients who have undergone gastric bypass surgery, the re-emergence of hyperglycemia without weight regain is Suggested reading likely related to ß-cell exhaustion. Pharmacologic interven- Kashyap SR, Schauer P. Clinical considerations for the management of residual diabetes following bariatric surgery. Diabetes, Obes Metab. 2012;14:773-779. tions in these patients should target ß-cell failure with a trial of sulphonylureas and the subsequent addition of insulin. However, due to the insulin-sensitizing and incretin-related effects of gastric bypass in patients with diabetes, these Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1567-1576. agents should be used cautiously due to the potential for hypoglycemia. Revisional bariatric surgery in these patients should be considered only for select surgical failure cases as Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1995;222:339-350. it is associated with additional morbidity. Looking forward With an estimated 350,000 bariatric operations performed worldwide each year, additional research is needed regarding the adjunctive use of medications for long-term diabetes control. Safety and efficacy trials are warranted in this patient population to define the potential roles of alternative diabetes agents such as GLP-agonists, acarbose and Nannipieri M, Mari A, Anselmino M, et al. The role of betacell function and insulin sensitivity in the remission of type 2 diabetes after gastric bypass surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:E1372-E1379. Chikunguwo SM, Wolfe LG, Dodson P, et al. Analysis of factors associated with durable remission of diabetes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:254-259. bromocriptine in conjunction with lifestyle counseling. Data regarding the use of alternative diabetes therapies including incretin analogues (i.e., DPP4 inhibitors and 800.223.2273, ext. 46568 Schauer PR, Burguera B, Ikramuddin S, et al. Effect of laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric bypass on type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 2003;238:467-484. | 15 |clevelandclinic.org/endonotes Benefits of Bariatric Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes Extend to Improvement, Prevention of Nephropathy By Philip R. Schauer, MD Studies have demonstrated that the benefits of bariatric surgery extend beyond durable weight loss and include significant improvements in glycemic control and a sustainable improvement in diabetes. The results of a study that we conducted recently at the Bariatric & Metabolic Institute take that concept one step further: Bariatric surgery also can improve or even prevent microvascular complications such as diabetic nephropathy. Our study included obese diabetic patients who had undergone bariatric surgery at our institution and who had completed a five-year follow-up (n=52; 75 percent female). The patients’ average preoperative BMI was 49, and the primary bariatric surgery performed was gastric bypass. The mean length of time patients had been diagnosed with diabetes was 8.5 years, HbA1c was 7.9±1.3 percent and 35 percent had diabetic nephropathy. We hypothesized that improving diabetes control may have positive effects on end-organ complications of the disease, including diabetic nephropathy. Remarkably, we found that 55 percent of patients with diabetic nephropathy prior to their bariatric surgery had a resolution of the disease at a mean follow-up of 66 months. Among those patients with no evidence of diabetic nephropathy prior to bariatric surgery, only 25 percent proceeded to develop albuminuria five years later. Additionally, the five-year remission and improvement rates for diabetes were 22 percent and 55 percent, respectively. Endocrine Notes | 16 |2012 “No medical therapy has been as effective as bariatric surgery in achieving an effect of this magnitude on diabetic nephropathy.” The presence of diabetic nephropathy, pre- and postop- When my colleagues and I initiated this study, we hypoth- eratively, was determined by urinary albumin-creatinine esized that bariatric surgery may halt the progression of ratio (uACR). Patients’ current diabetes status (remission, diabetic nephropathy. Instead we found that over half of the improvement or no change) was determined by biochemical patients who had diabetic nephropathy prior to undergoing analyses and review of medications. bariatric surgery experienced remission. We presented our findings at the 29th Annual Meeting of No medical therapy has been as effective as bariatric sur- the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in gery in achieving an effect of this magnitude on diabetic June 2012. The findings follow a study that I published with nephropathy. This is an important finding that warrants colleagues earlier in 2012 in the New England Journal of further research and greater consideration of bariatric Medicine that showed bariatric surgery can cause remis- surgery in this patient population. sion of type 2 diabetes even before substantial weight loss occurs. About the author Sustainable clinical benefits Dr. Schauer, Professor of Surgery and Director of Cleveland Clinic’s Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, can be reached at 216.444.4794 or [email protected]. Studies have shown that patients may lose as much as 60 percent of their excess weight six months after bariatric/ metabolic surgery and 77 percent of excess weight as early as 12 months after surgery. In addition to remission or improvement in type 2 diabetes and its complications, the patients in our study were able to maintain 50 percent of their excess weight loss after five years and also achieved significant improvements in blood pressure and cholesterol levels. 800.223.2273, ext. 46568 Suggested reading Heneghan HM, Orzech N, Bencsath K, Cetin D, Brethauer SA, Schauer PR. Effects of bariatric surgery on diabetic nephropathy after 5 years of follow-up. Abstract PL-116. Presented at the 29th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, San Diego, Calif., June 17-22, 2012. Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1567-1576. | 17 |clevelandclinic.org/endonotes Gastric Bypass Improves Glucose Homeostasis by Attenuating the Effect of Ghrelin on ß-cell Function By Sangeeta Rao Kashyap, MD; Steven K. Malin, PhD; and Aashish Samat, MD STAMPEDE (Surgical Therapy and Medications Potentially Eradicate Diabetes Efficiently) was a single-center prospective, randomized, controlled trial conducted at Cleveland Clinic’s Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute. We designed this metabolic substudy to determine the impact of intensive medical therapy combined with either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy on glycemic control in obese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. As a continuation of the STAMPEDE trial, we are now looking at the effects of two bariatric surgery procedures on ghrelin as a mediator of glucose regulation and will be presenting related substudy results at the American Diabetes Association’s 73rd Scientific Sessions (2013), June 21-25, 2013, Chicago, Ill. A healthy insulin response, illustrated here, is one result of gastric bypass. Insulin secretion increases most following gastric bypass compared with sleeve gastrectomy or intensive medical therapy. Despite the known effects of surgery-induced diabetes In our recent substudy, 53 moderately obese adults with remission, the mechanism responsible for this improved poorly controlled diabetes were randomized to intensive glycemic control remains unclear. Ghrelin is a fundus-derived medical therapy alone vs. gastric bypass and sleeve gas- hormone that has glucoregulatory effects on ß-cell function trectomy. At baseline and 24 months, we measured ß-cell and insulin sensitivity. function, insulin sensitivity (determined by mixed-meal tolerance testing), body fat and postprandial ghrelin levels. In addition, ghrelin is an appetite-stimulating hormone that Gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy decreased body fat plays a key role in body weight regulation. For example, obese, insulin-resistant adults with type 2 diabetes mel- by approximately 12 percent at 24 months, while intensive litus have decreased abilities to suppress ghrelin following medical therapy had little effect (Table 1). Although fast- food intake. This impaired response subsequently leads to ing glycemia improved in all three groups at 24 months overeating and the development of poor insulin secretion. (P<0.05), insulin sensitivity and ß-cell function increased Improving ghrelin suppression therefore represents an impor- most following gastric bypass compared with sleeve gastrec- tant endocrine-related mechanism for diabetes remission. tomy or intensive medical therapy. Endocrine Notes | 18 |2012 Although follow-up studies Ghrelin Suppression (pg/mL) Table 1 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -2.0 -2.5 -3.0 -3.5 -4.0 -4.5 -5.0 IMT SG RYGB are required to understand how ghrelin affects insulin secretion, our data suggest a * *^ role for ghrelin as a regulator Baseline 24 months of glucose metabolism after *IMT vs. SG vs. RYGB at 24 months (P<0.001) ^Change from 0-24 months RYGB vs. SG (P=0.03) and IMT (P=0.09) gastric bypass surgery. IMT, intensive medical therapy; SG, sleeve gastrectomy; RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass After 24 months, only gastric bypass improved ghrelin suppression (P<0.05 vs. sleeve gastrectomy; P=0.09 vs. intensive medical therapy). Lower ghrelin levels correlated with enhanced ß-cell function (r=-0.29, P=0.03) and decreased abdominal fat (r=0.37, P=0.006). Improved insulin secretion correlated with reduced fasting glucose levels (r=-0.39, P<0.01). Together, these findings suggest that gastric bypass restores normal glucose homeostasis by attenuating the negative effect of ghrelin on ß-cell function. Although follow-up studies are required to understand how ghrelin affects insulin secretion, our data suggest a role for decreased abdominal body fat. About the authors Dr. Kashyap is an endocrinologist in the Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and is a co-lead investigator in the STAMPEDE trial. Dr. Malin is a postdoctoral fellow in Pathobiology at Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute. Dr. Samat is an endocrinology fellow in the Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. For more information, please contact Dr. Kashyap at 216.445.2679 or [email protected]. 800.223.2273, ext. 46568 | 19 |clevelandclinic.org/endonotes Publications Below are peer-reviewed journal articles and Archives of Surgery book chapters published within the past year by Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Karabulut K, Siperstein A, Berber E. Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute staff. Robotic vs laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Arch Surg. 2012;147(3):272-275. Journals Shin JJ, Milas M, Mitchell J, Berber E, Ross L, Siperstein A. Academic Medicine Impact of localization studies and clinical scenario in patients Young JB, Cosgrove DM. Change we must: Putting patients first with hyperparathyroidism being evaluated for reoperative neck with the institute model of academic health center organization surgery. Arch Surg. 2011;146(12):1397-1403. [Commentary]. Acad Med. 2012;87(5):552-554. Bariatric Nursing and Surgical Patient Care American Journal of Cardiology Calogeras E, Zeller M, Hoover C, Cooper K, Tuininga P, Ashton Heneghan HM, Meron-Eldar S, Brethauer SA, Schauer PR, K. Sleeve gastrectomy patients may be at increased risk post- Young JB. Effect of bariatric surgery on cardiovascular risk pro- operatively for decline in vitamin B12 values — do they need file. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(10):1499-1507. monitoring? Bariatr Nurs Surg Patient Care. 2012;7(1):21-24. American Journal of Otolaryngology Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Makin V, Hatipoglu B, Hamrahian AH, Arrossi AV, Knott PD, Jin J, McHenry CR. Thyroid incidentaloma. Best Pract Res Clin Lee JH, Sade B. Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea as Endocrinol Metab. 2012;26(1):83-96. the initial presentation of growth hormone-secreting pituitary Orija IB, Weil RJ, Hamrahian AH. Pituitary incidentaloma. Best adenoma. Am J Otolaryngol. 2011;32(5):433-437. Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;26(1):47-68. American Journal of Physiology – Endocrinology and Metabolism Body Image Haus JM, Solomon TPJ, Lu L, Jesberger JA, Barkoukis H, Flask Coughlin JW, Schreyer CC, Sarwer DB, Heinberg LJ, Redgrave CA, Kirwan JP. Intramyocellular lipid content and insulin sen- GW, Guarda AS. Cosmetic surgery in inpatients with eating disor- sitivity are increased following a short-term low-glycemic index ders: Attitudes and experience. Body Image. 2012;9(1):180-183. diet and exercise intervention. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2011;301(3):E511-E516. Abdelmalak B, Zimmerman R, Foss J. Diagnosing preoperative Annals of Surgical Oncology hyperglycemia in non-diabetic patients: a challenge and an Bohacek L, Milas M, Mitchell J, Siperstein A, Berber E. opportunity [Reply]. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58(6):583. Diagnostic accuracy of surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided Circulation: Heart Failure fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules. Ann Surg Oncol. Hsich EM, Naftel DC, Myers SL, Gorodeski EZ, Grady KL, 2012;19(1):45-51. Schmuhl D, Ulisney KL, Young JB. Should women receive left Sahin DA, Agcaoglu O, Chretien C, Siperstein A, Berber E. The ventricular assist device support? Findings from INTERMACS. utility of PET/CT in the management of patients with colorectal Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5(2):234-240. liver metastases undergoing laparoscopic radiofrequency thermal ablation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(3):850-855. Endocrine Notes | 20 |2012 Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Endocrine Practice Albashir S, Olansky L, Sasidhar M. Progressive muscle Alguraan Z, Agcaoglu O, El-Hayek K, Hamrahian AH, Siperstein weakness: More there than meets the eye. Cleve Clin J Med. A, Berber E. Retroperitoneal masses mimicking adrenal tumors. 2011;78(6):385-391. Endocr Pract. 2012;18(3):335-341. Lansang MC, Hustak LK. Glucocorticoid-induced diabetes Cheng V, Doshi KB, Falcone T, Faiman C. Hyperandrogenism and adrenal suppression: How to detect and manage them. in a postmenopausal woman: diagnostic and therapeutic Cleve Clin J Med. 2011;78(11):748-756. challenges. Endocr Pract. 2011;17(2):E21-E25. Lansang MC, Hustak LK. Glucocorticoid-induced Harvey A, Hu M, Gupta M, Butler R, Mitchell J, Berber E, diabetes and adrenal suppression [Reply]. Cleve Clin J Med. Siperstein A, Milas M. A new, vitamin D-based, multidimension- 2012;79(4):237,242. al nomogram for the diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism. Endocr Pract. 2012;18(2):124-131. Newey CR, Sarwal A, Uchin J, Mulligan G. Necrotic skin lesions Katznelson L, Atkinson JLD, Cook DM, Ezzat SZ, Hamrahian after hemodialysis. Cleve Clin J Med. 2011;78(10):646-648. AH, Miller KK. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Diagnosis and Thomas G, Sehgal AR, Kashyap SR, Srinivas TR, Kirwan JP, Treatment of Acromegaly — 2011 update: executive summary. Navaneethan SD. Metabolic syndrome and kidney disease: A Endocr Pract. 2011;17(4):636-646. systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. Pantalone KM, Faiman C, Olansky L. Insulin glargine use during 2011;6(10):2364-2373. pregnancy. Endocr Pract. 2011;17(3):448-455. Diabetes Care Pantalone KM, Faiman C, Olansky L. Use of insulin detemir Pantalone KM, Kattan MW, Wells BJ, Zimmerman RS. The risk and insulin glargine during pregnancy: Are the data convincing? of overall mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving Endocr Pract. 2011;17(5):830. glipizide, glyburide, or glimepiride monotherapy: A retrospective Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy analysis [Response to Comment on: Pantalone et al. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1224-1229]. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(8):E139. Subbarayan S, Kipnes M. Sitagliptin: a review. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011;12(10):1613-1622. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Olansky L, Reasner C, Seck TL, Williams-Herman DE, Chen M, Expert Review of Endocrinology and Metabolism Terranella L, Mehta A, Kaufman KD, Goldstein BJ. A treatment Kashyap SR, Louis ES, Kirwan JP. Weight loss as a cure for strategy implementing combination therapy with sitagliptin and type 2 diabetes? Fact or fantasy. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. metformin results in superior glycaemic control versus metformin 2011;6(4):557-561. monotherapy due to a low rate of addition of antihyperglycaemic Heart Failure Clinics agents. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13(9):841-849. Rhoads GG, Dain MP, Zhang Q, Kennedy L. Two-year glycaemic control and healthcare expenditures following initiation of insulin glargine versus neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13(8):711-717. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice Baliga RR, Young JB. Clinical trials to “real-world” heart failure: applying risk stratification to deliver personalized care. Heart Fail Clin. 2011;7(4):xi-xiv. Baliga RR, Young JB. Early detection and monitoring of vulnerable myocardium in patients receiving chemotherapy: is it time to change tracks? Heart Fail Clin. 2011;7(3):xiii-xxix. Pantalone KM, Agarwal S, Faiman C. Glargine vs. NPH insulin therapy in pregnancies complicated by diabetes: An observational cohort study [Comment on Negrato et al]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;93(1):E9-E10. continued on next page 800.223.2273, ext. 46568 | 21 |clevelandclinic.org/endonotes Publications continued Journal of Medical Economics Baliga RR, Young JB. Reducing the burden of stage B heart failure and the global pandemic of cardiovascular disease: Lamy A, Wang X, Gao P, Tong W, Gafni A, Dans A, Avezum A, time to go to war with the “barefoot” troops! Heart Fail Clin. Ferreira R, Young J, Yusuf S, Teo K. The cost implications of the 2012;8(2):ix-xiii. use of telmisartan or ramipril in patients at high risk for vascular events: the ONTARGET study. J Med Econ. 2011;14(6):792-797. Baliga RR, Young JB. Reducing the burden of stage B heart failure will require connecting the dots between “knowns” and Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism “known unknowns.” Heart Fail Clin. 2012;8(1):xi-xv. Sun G, Kashyap SR. Cancer risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Hepatology metabolic links and therapeutic considerations. J Nutr Metab. Zein CO, Yerian LM, Gogate P, Lopez R, Kirwan JP, Feldstein AE, McCullough AJ. Pentoxifylline improves nonalcoholic steato- 2011;2011:708183. Journal of Obesity hepatitis: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Hepatology. Cheng V, Kashyap SR. Weight considerations in pharmacothera- 2011;54(5):1610-1619. py for type 2 diabetes. J Obes. 2011;2011:984245. International Journal of Cancer Medical Clinics of North America Nock NL, Patrick-Melin A, Cook M, Thompson C, Kirwan JP, Li L. Higher bone mineral density is associated with a decreased Smith BR, Schauer P, Nguyen NT. Surgical approaches to the risk of colorectal adenomas. Int J Cancer. 2011;129(4):956-964. treatment of obesity: bariatric surgery. Med Clin North Am. 2011;95(5):1009-1030. International Journal of Obesity (London) Eldar S, Heneghan HM, Brethauer SA, Schauer PR. Bariatric Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise surgery for treatment of obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). Kelly KR, Blaszczak A, Haus JM, Patrick-Melin A, Fealy CE, 2011;35(Suppl 3):S16-S21. Solomon TPJ, Kalinski MI, Kirwan JP. A 7-d exercise program increases high-molecular weight adiponectin in obese adults. Issues in Science and Technology Young JB. A better process for new medical devices. Issues Sci Technol. 2011;27(4):10-12. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1):69-74. Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders Kennedy DJ, Kashyap SR. Pathogenic role of scavenger receptor The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Zeiger MA, Siegelman SS, Hamrahian AH. Medical and surgical evaluation and treatment of adrenal incidentalomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(7):2004-2015. CD36, metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2011;9(4):239-245. Minerva Endocrinologica Milas Z, Shin J, Milas M. New guidelines for the management Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Bencsath KP, Falk G, Morris-Stiff G, Kroh M, Walsh RM, Chalikonda S. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: do patients care? J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(3):535-539. of thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Minerva Endocrinol. 2011;36(1):53-70. Neurology Busch RM, Frazier T, Chapin JS, Hamrahian AH, Diehl B, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Kormos RL, Stevenson LW, Pagani FD, Miller MA, Baldwin JT, Young JB. The Fourth INTERMACS Annual Report: 4,000 implants and counting. J Heart Lung Alexopoulos A, Unnwongse K, Naugle RI, Kubu CS, Tesar GE, Najm IM. Role of cortisol in mood and memory in patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2012;78(14):1064-1068. Transplant. 2012;31(2):117-126. Endocrine Notes | 22 |2012 The New England Journal of Medicine Psychiatric Annals Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Maudlin S, Hatipoglu B. Is there a lack of communication Pothier CE, Thomas S, Abood B, Nissen SE, Bhatt DL. Bariatric between endocrinologists and psychiatrists regarding metabolic surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with screening of second-generation antipsychotic users? Psychiatr diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1567-1576. Ann. 2011;41(7):350. Obesity (Silver Spring) Rheumatology (Oxford) Huang H, Kasumov T, Gatmaitan P, Heneghan HM, Kashyap SR, Knafo R, Haythornthwaite JA, Heinberg L, Wigley FM, Thombs Schauer PR, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP. Gastric bypass surgery BD. The association of body image dissatisfaction and pain reduces plasma ceramide subspecies and improves insulin with reduced sexual function in women with systemic sclerosis. sensitivity in severely obese patients. Obesity (Silver Spring). Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(6):1125-1130. 2011;19(11):2235-2240. Surgeon Obesity Surgery Eldar S, Heneghan HM, Brethauer S, Schauer PR. A focus on Appachi S, Kelly KR, Schauer PR, Kirwan JP, Hazen S, Gupta surgical preoperative evaluation of the bariatric patient — The M, Kashyap SR. Reduced cardiovascular risk following bariatric Cleveland Clinic protocol and review of the literature. Surgeon. surgeries is related to a partial recovery from “adiposopathy.” 2011;9(5):273-277. Obes Surg. 2011;21(12):1928-1936. Surgery Wu J, You J, Yerian L, Shiba A, Schauer PR, Sessler DI. Agcaoglu O, Sahin DA, Siperstein A, Berber E. Selection Prevalence of liver steatosis and fibrosis and the diagnostic algorithm for posterior versus lateral approach in laparoscopic accuracy of ultrasound in bariatric surgery patients. Obes Surg. adrenalectomy. Surgery. 2012;151(5):731-735. 2012;22(2):240-247. Karabulut K, Akyildiz HY, Lance C, Aucejo F, McLennan G, Pediatric Emergency Care Agcaoglu O, Siperstein A, Berber E. Multimodality treatment of Horwitz SM, Heinberg LJ, Storfer-Isser A, Barnes DH, Smith M, neuroendocrine liver metastases. Surgery. 2011;150(2):316-325. Kapur R, Findling R, Currier G, Wilcox HC, Wilkens K. Teaching Karabulut K, Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Siperstein A, Berber E. physicians to assess suicidal youth presenting to the emergency Comparison of intraoperative time use and perioperative out- department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27(7):601-605. comes for robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surgery. 2012;151(4):537-542. Pituitary Cheng V, Faiman C, Kennedy L, Khoury F, Hatipoglu B, Weil Wallace LB, Parikh RT, Ross LV, Mazzaglia PJ, Foley C, Shin R, Hamrahian A. Pregnancy and acromegaly: a review. Pituitary. JJ, Mitchell JC, Berber E, Siperstein AE, Milas M. The pheno- 2012;15(1):59-63. type of primary hyperparathyroidism with normal parathyroid Daud S, Hamrahian AH, Weil RJ, Hamaty M, Prayson RA, 2011;150(6):1102-1112. hormone levels: How low can parathyroid hormone go? Surgery. Olansky L. Acromegaly with negative pituitary MRI and no evidence of ectopic source: the role of transphenoidal pituitary exploration? Pituitary. 2011;14(4):414-417. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases Brethauer S. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Grover V, Hamrahian AH, Prayson RA, Weil RJ. Rathke’s cleft Surgery position statement on global bariatric healthcare. cyst presenting as bilateral abducens nerve palsy. Pituitary. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(6):669-671. 2011;14(4):395-399. Brethauer S. ASMBS position statement on preoperative supervised weight loss requirements. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(3):257-260. continued on next page 800.223.2273, ext. 46568 | 23 |clevelandclinic.org/endonotes Publications continued Brethauer SA, Chand B, Schauer PR, Thompson CC. Transoral Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S, Chand B, Escobar P, Kaouk gastric volume reduction as intervention for weight manage- J, Chalikonda S. First human surgery with a novel single-port ment: 12-month follow-up of TRIM trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site 2012;8(3):296-303. platform. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(11):3566-3573. Heinberg LJ, Ashton K, Coughlin J. Alcohol and bariatric Yimcharoen P, Heneghan HM, Singh M, Brethauer S, Schauer P, surgery: review and suggested recommendations for assessment Rogula T, Kroh M, Chand B. Endoscopic findings and outcomes and management. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(3):357-363. of revisional procedures for patients with weight recidivism after Heneghan HM, Heinberg L, Windover A, Rogula T, Schauer PR. Weighing the evidence for an association between obesity and gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(10):3345-3352. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques suicide risk. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):98-107. Berber E, Siperstein A. Robotic transaxillary total thyroidectomy Schauer PR, Rubino F. International Diabetes Federation using a unilateral approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan position statement on bariatric surgery for type 2 diabetes: impli- Tech. 2011;21(3):207-210. cations for patients, physicians, and surgeons. Surg Obes Relat Wallace LB, Berber E. Percutaneous and video-assisted ablation Dis. 2011;7(4):448-451. of endocrine tumors: liver, adrenal, and thyroid. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011;21(4):255-259. Yimcharoen P, Heneghan HM, Tariq N, Brethauer SA, Kroh M, Chand B. Endoscopic stent management of leaks and anastomotic strictures after foregut surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Thyroid 2011;7(5):628-636. Cheng V, Brainard J, Nasr C. Co-occurrence of papillary Yimcharoen P, Heneghan H, Chand B, Talarico JA, Tariq N, Kroh M, Brethauer SA. Successful management of gastrojejunal strictures after gastric bypass: is timing important? Surg Obes Relat thyroid carcinoma and primary lymphoma of the thyroid in a patient with long-standing Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Thyroid. 2012;22(6):647-650. Dis. 2012;8(2):151-157. McQuade C, Skugor M, Brennan DM, Hoar B, Stevenson Surgical Clinics of North America hypothyroidism are associated with increased all-cause mortality Brethauer SA. Sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Clin North Am. independent of coronary heart disease risk factors: A PreCIS 2011;91(6):1265-1279. database study. Thyroid. 2011;21(8):837-843. Surgical Endoscopy Brethauer SA, Heneghan HM, Eldar S, Gatmaitan P, Huang H, Book Chapters Kashyap S, Gornik HL, Kirwan JP, Schauer PR. Early effects Ashton K, Budur K. Scared to sleep: A Hurricane Katrina survi- C, Hoogwerf BJ. Hypothyroidism and moderate subclinical of gastric bypass on endothelial function, inflammation, and vor. In: Foldvary-Schaefer N, Krishna J, Budur K, eds. A Case a cardiovascular risk in obese patients [Erratum in: Surg Endosc. Week: Sleep Disorders from the Cleveland Clinic. Oxford; New 2011;25(8):2660]. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(8):2650-2659. York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011. Chapter 3. p. 43-48. Gould J, Ellsmere J, Fanelli R, Hutter M, Jones S, Pratt J, Ashton K, Streem D. Smoking cessation. In: Carey WD, ed. Schauer P, Schirmer B, Schwaitzberg S, Jones DB. Panel report: Current Clinical Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/ best practices for the surgical treatment of obesity. Surg Endosc. Elsevier; 2010. p. 977-980. 2011;25(6):1730-1740. Babar T, Skugor M. Diabetes mellitus treatment. In: Carey WD, ed. Current Clinical Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010. p. 358-363. Endocrine Notes | 24 |2012 Brethauer S, Kashyap S, Schauer P. Obesity. In: Carey WD, ed. Moustarah F, Brethauer SA, Schauer PR. Laparoscopic surgery Current Clinical Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/ for severe obesity. In: Cameron JL, Cameron AM, eds. Current Elsevier; 2010. p. 391-396. Surgical Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2011. p. 1304-1316. Chikunguwo SM, Brethauer SA, Schauer PR. Bariatric surgery. In: Cameron JL, Cameron AM, eds. Surgery of the Esophagus Nasr C. Flushing. In: Carey WD, ed. Current Clinical Medicine. and Stomach. London; New York, NY: Springer; 2011. Chapter 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010. p. 369-375. 16. p. 217-232. Reddy SSK. Hypothalamic-pituitary disorders. In: Camacho PM, Chinnappa P, Mehta A. Hirsutism. In: Carey WD, ed. Current ed. Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism (A Color Handbook). Clinical Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; London: Manson Publishing; 2011. Chapter 4. p. 91-112. 2010. p. 376-379. Schirmer B, Schauer PR. The surgical management of obesity. Diab DL, Hamrahian AH. Clinical detection and treatment of be- In: Brunicardi FC, ed. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. 9th ed. nign and malignant pituitary diseases. In: Hunt JL, ed. Molecular New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2010. Chapter 27. p. 949-978. Pathology of Endocrine Diseases. New York, NY: Springer; 2010. Chapter 17. p. 169-174. Skugor M. Section 4: Endocrinology [Section editor]. In: Carey WD, ed. Current Clinical Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Gatmaitan P, Brethauer SA, Schauer PR. Obesity and presentations after anti-obesity surgery. In: Talley NJ, Kane SV, Wallace Saunders/Elsevier; 2010. p. 335-420. Skugor M. Hypocalcemia and hypercalcemia. In: Carey WD, ed. MB, eds. Practical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. Small Current Clinical Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/ and Large Intestine and Pancreas. Chichester, West Sussex ; Elsevier; 2010. p. 380-386. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. Chapter 24. p. 169-175. Skugor M. Osteoporosis. In: Carey WD, ed. Current Clinical Gopan T, Hamrahian A. Adrenal disorders. In: Camacho PM, Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010. ed. Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism (A Color Handbook). p. 402-407. London: Manson Publishing; 2011. Chapter 5. p. 113-147. Skugor M, Fleseriu M. Hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism. In: Harvey AM, Siperstein AE, Berber E. Clinical detection and Carey WD, ed. Current Clinical Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, treatment of adrenal disease. In: Hunt JL, ed. Molecular Pathology of Endocrine Diseases. New York, NY: Springer; 2010. Chapter 19. p. 197-203. PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010. p. 416-420. Skugor M, Hamrahian AH. Pituitary disorders. In: Carey WD, ed. Current Clinical Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/ Ioachimescu AG, Hamrahian AH. Diseases of the adrenal Elsevier; 2010. p. 408-415. gland. In: Carey WD, ed. Current Clinical Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010. p. 336-349. Zimmerman R. Microvascular complications of diabetes. In: Carey WD, ed. Current Clinical Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Mitchell JC. Clinical detection and treatment of pancreatic PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010. p. 355-357. neuroendocrine tumors. In: Hunt JL, ed. Molecular Pathology of Endocrine Diseases. New York, NY: Springer; 2010. Chapter 22. p. 229-235. Mitchell JC, Milas M. Clinical detection and treatment of thyroid diseases. In: Hunt JL, ed. Molecular Pathology of Endocrine Diseases. New York, NY: Springer; 2010. Chapter 4. p. 27-35. 800.223.2273, ext. 46568 | 25 |clevelandclinic.org/endonotes Live and Online CME Opportunities Cleveland Clinic’s Center for Continuing Education offers convenient, complimentary learning opportunities, from webcasts and podcasts to a host of medical publications, in addition to live CME symposia. Thyroid Expo 2013 Jan. 26, 2013 Lerner College of Medicine | NA5-08 Auditorium and Conference Wing This one-day course will highlight recent advances in the management of thyroid diseases. In 2012, these included molecular pathogenesis and prognostication in thyroid cancer. More so than ever before, innovations of new surgical technologies, thyroid cancer diagnostic tests, and new therapies for thyroid cancer are influencing patient care options. The format of the course is designed to address the key concepts of these advancements during lectures and panel discussions. Diabetes Day 2013 May 31, 2013 Intercontinental Hotel and Bank of America Conference Center, Cleveland Get up to date on the mechanisms of complications for patients with diabetes. This event is designed to increase your competency and performance when caring for this patient population, ultimately improving patient outcomes. For more information on these events, visit our website: clevelandclinic.org/endonotes Online CME Online webcasts and journal articles of interest to endocrinologists and approved for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ include: Online Webcast “The Next Generation of Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes” Estimated Time: 45 minutes Online Journal Article “Glucocorticoid-Induced Diabetes and Adrenal Suppression: How to Detect and Manage Them” Estimated Time: 1 hour Online Journal Article “Does Lack of Sleep Cause Diabetes?” Estimated Time: 1 hour For a full list of all Cleveland Clinic CME opportunities, please visit ccfcme.org; to manage your CME credits, use the myCME.com Web portal, available 24/7. Endocrine Notes | 26 |2012 Current Clinical Trials T I T LE PI CONTAC T / N U M B E R ACROSTUDY – A Multicenter, Post-Marketing Surveillance Study of Somavert® Therapy in Patients with Acromegaly in the USA and Europe Amir Hamrahian, MD Andreea Mocanu 216.444.9612 Somatuline® Depot (Lanreotide) Injection for Acromegaly (SODA): A Post-Marketing Observational Study Betul Hatipoglu, MD Andreea Mocanu 216.444.9612 DiaPep277® – A Phase III, Multinational, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Investigate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of DiaPep277 in Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes Subjects Leann Olansky, MD Bob McCoy 216.445.4029 A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Renal Efficacy of LY2382770 in Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease Due to Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes Leann Olansky, MD Andreea Mocanu 216.444.9612 A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Outcomes During Treatment with Lixisenatide in Type 2 Diabetic Patients After an Acute Coronary Syndrome Robert Zimmerman, MD Bob McCoy 216.445.4029 EXenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering Trial (EXSCEL) Robert Zimmerman, MD Bob McCoy 216.445.4029 The Diagnostic Accuracy of the Glucagon Stimulation Test for Evaluation of Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency and the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Amir Hamrahian, MD Bob McCoy 216.445.4029 The CAROLINA Trial – A Multicentre, International, Randomized, Parallel Group, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Safety of Linagliptin vs. Glimepiride in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus at High Cardiovascular Risk Leann Olansky, MD Andreea Mocanu 216.444.9612 Effect of a Portion-Controlled, Commercially Available Diet on Presurgical Weight Loss and Metabolic Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery Leslie Heinberg, PhD, MA Chytaine Hall 216.445.3983 Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Mechanisms of Type 2 Diabetes: The B2D Trial John Kirwan, PhD Chytaine Hall 216.445.3983 Gastric Plication for the Treatment of Obesity and Related Conditions Philip Schauer, MD Janice Kakish 216.444.7551 Parathyroidectomy – Effect of Parathyroidectomy in Reducing Coronary Artery Calcification and Improving Vascular Compliance in Patients with Primary and Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Eren Berber, MD Linda Heil 216.444.2262 Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase II Trial of Radiofrequency Ablation +/- Lyso-Thermosensitive Liposomal Doxorubicin (ThermoDox®) for Colorectal Liver Metastases ≥2 cm Maximum Diameter Allan Siperstein, MD Linda Heil 216.444.2262 Allan Siperstein, MD Linda Heil 216.444.2262 Prospective Randomized Comparison of Bilateral vs. Focal Neck Exploration for Sporadic Hyperparathyroidism 800.223.2273, ext. 46568 | 27 |clevelandclinic.org/endonotes Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute Staff Directory ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM INSTITUTE LEADERSHIP James Young, MD Institute Chairman Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute 216.444.2333 Allan Siperstein, MD Chairman, Department of Endocrine Surgery Laurence (Ned) Kennedy, MD Chairman, Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Philip Schauer, MD Chairman, Bariatric & Metabolic Institute 216.445.8645 216.444.4794 216.444.5664 Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Revital Gorodeski Baskin, MD Specialty Interest(s): Endocrinology, thyroid disorders, thyroid cancer Location(s): Independence Family Health Center Office: 216.986.4000 | Fax: 216.986.4995 Appointments: 216.986.4000 Betul Hatipoglu, MD Specialty Interest(s): Diabetes, thyroid disorders, pituitary disorders, adrenal disorders, alternative medicine Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.445.6709 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Kevin Borst, DO Specialty Interest(s): Endocrine disorders in pregnancy, general endocrinology, diabetes Location(s): Lakewood Hospital Professional Building Office: 216.529.5300 | Fax: 216.529.5301 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Suman Jana, MD Specialty Interest(s): General endocrinology, diabetes, thyroid disease, thyroid cancer Location(s): Main campus; Medina Office: 216.444.0567 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: Main campus, 216.444.6568; Medina, 330.725.3713 Krupa Doshi, MD Specialty Interest(s): General endocrinology, diabetes, parathyroid and calcium disorders, hirsutism, thyroid disorders, adrenal disorders Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.445.0741 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Marwan Hamaty, MD Specialty Interest(s): General endocrinology, diabetes Location(s): Main campus; Strongsville Family Health and Surgery Center Office: 216.445.7568 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: Main campus, 216.444.6568; Strongsville, 440.878.2500 Amir Hamrahian, MD Specialty Interest(s): Pituitary and adrenal disorders Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.445.8538 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Visit clevelandclinic.org/EndoStaff for the most current staff listings and locations. Sangeeta Kashyap, MD Specialty Interest(s): Endocrinology, diabetes, insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk prevention, obesity, metabolic syndrome and diseases, hyperlipidemia Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.445.2679 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Laurence (Ned) Kennedy, MD Department Chair Specialty Interest(s): General endocrinology, diabetes, pituitary disorders, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, thyroiditis Location(s): Main campus; Ashtabula County Medical Center; Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston Office: 216.445.8645 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: Main campus, 216.444.6568; Ashtabula, 440.997.6910; Florida, 954.659.6038 Leila Khan, MD Specialty Interest(s): General endocrinology, diabetes, calcium/bone disorders Location(s): Main campus; Willoughby Hills Family Health Center Office: 216.445.1598 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: Main campus, 216.444.6568; Willoughby Hills, 440.943.2500 Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute | Staff Directory M. Cecilia Lansang, MD, MPH Specialty Interest(s): General endocrinology, diabetes Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.445.5246 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Melissa Li-Ng, MD Specialty Interest(s): General endocrinology, diabetes Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.444.1949 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Vinni Makin, MD Specialty Interest(s): General endocrinology, diabetes, hirsutism, acne, thyroid disorders Location(s): Main campus; Solon Family Health Center Office: 216.444.0539 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: Main campus, 216.444.6568; Solon, 440.519.6800 Adi Mehta, MD Specialty Interest(s): Diabetes, thyroid disorders, endocrine complications of pregnancy, menopause, lipid disorders, general and adolescent endocrinology Location(s): Main campus; Beachwood Family Health Center (reproductive endocrinology only) Office: 216.445.5312 | Fax: 216.445.7261 Appointments: Main campus, 216.444.6568; Beachwood, 216.839.3000 Guy Mulligan, MD Specialty Interest(s): General endocrinology, diabetes Location(s): Main campus; Independence Family Health Center; Twinsburg Family Health and Surgery Center Office: 330.888.4000 | Fax: 330.963.4561 Appointments: Independence, 216.986.4000; Main campus, 216.444.6568; Twinsburg, 330.888.4000 Christian Nasr, MD Specialty Interest(s): Thyroid nodules, thyroid cancers, flushing syndromes Location(s): Main campus; Lorain Family Health and Surgery Center (thyroid cancer only) Office: 216.445.1788 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: Main campus, 216.444.6568; Lorain, 440.204.7400 Leann Olansky, MD Specialty Interest(s): Diabetes and diabetes complications, gestational diabetes, general endocrinology Location(s): Main campus; Stephanie Tubbs Jones Health Center Office: 216.444.2642 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: Main campus, 216.444.6568; Stephanie Tubbs Jones Health Center, 216.767.4242 Kevin Pantalone, DO Specialty Interest(s): Type 2 diabetes mellitus; male hypogonadism (low testosterone); thyroid, pituitary and adrenal disorders Location(s): Main campus; Twinsburg Family Health and Surgery Center Office: 330.888.4000 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: Main campus, 216.444.6568; Twinsburg, 330.888.4000 Seenia Peechakara, MD Specialty Interest(s): Endocrine disorders in pregnancy, thyroid disorders, thyroid cancer, diabetes, calcium and parathyroid disorders, lipid disorders, pituitary and adrenal disorders, general endocrinology Location(s): Lakewood Hospital Professional Building Office: 216.529.5300 | Fax: 216.529.5301 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Richard Shewbridge, MD Specialty Interest(s): Endocrinology, diabetes, thyroid disorders, hyperlipidemia, osteoporosis Location(s): Medina Medical Office Building Office: 330.725.3713 | Fax: 330.725.2141 Appointments: 330.725.3713 David Shewmon, MD Specialty Interest(s): General endocrinology, diabetes, high cholesterol, osteomalacia, osteoporosis, pituitary tumors, thyroid conditions, thyroid cancer Location(s): Lakewood Hospital Professional Building Office: 216.529.5300 | Fax: 216.529.5301 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Mario Skugor, MD Associate Director, Endocrinology Fellowship Program Specialty Interest(s): Osteoporosis and calcium metabolism, obesity and diabetes, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes, thyroid disorders, thyroid cancer Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.445.0739 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Mariam Stevens, MD Specialty Interest(s): Diabetes, gestational diabetes, goiter, Graves disease, Hashimoto disease, hirsutism, hyperthyroidism, hypoglycemia, hypothyroidism, polycystic ovary syndrome, thyroid disease, Location(s): Independence Family Health Center Office: 216.986.4000 | Fax: 216.986.4995 Appointments: 216.986.4000 Mary Vouyiouklis, MD Specialty Interest(s): Thyroid disorders, thyroid cancer, parathyroid and calcium disorders, adrenal disorders, diabetes Location(s): Main campus; Solon Family Health Center; Willoughby Hills Family Health Center Office: 216.444.6568 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: Main campus, 216.444.6568; Solon, 440.519.6908; Willoughby Hills, 440.943.2500 Susan Williams, MD Specialty Interest(s): Bone and mineral metabolism, metabolic bone disease, calcium disorders, malabsorption and malnutrition in adults, medical bariatrics Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.444.5665 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Robert Zimmerman, MD Director, Cleveland Clinic Diabetes Center Department Vice Chair Program Director, Endocrinology Training Program Specialty Interest(s): Diabetes, thyroid disorders, growth hormone in adults Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.444.9428 | Fax: 216.445.1656 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Department of Endocrine Surgery Bariatric & Metabolic Institute Eren Berber, MD Director, Robotic Endocrine Surgery Specialty Interest(s): Endocrine surgery (thyroid and parathyroid), laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, robotic thyroid and parathyroid surgery, laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy and liver surgery Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.445.0555 | Fax: 216.636.0662 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Stacy Brethauer, MD Department Vice Chair Specialty Interest(s): Bariatric surgery, laparoscopic surgery, gastrointestinal surgery, hernia repair, endoscopy, surgery for GERD, hiatal hernia, solid-organ endoluminal surgery, single-incision laparoscopic surgery Location(s): Main campus; Richard E. Jacobs Health Center Office: 216.444.9244 | Fax: 216.445.1586 Appointments: Main campus, 216.445.2224; Richard E. Jacobs, 440.695.4000 Judy Jin, MD Specialty Interest(s): Endocrine surgery (thyroid and parathyroid), advanced laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopic adrenalectomy, laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.445.3411 | Fax: 216.636.0662 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Derrick Cetin, DO Specialty Interest(s): Bariatric medicine, medical weight management, nutrition sciences, obesity management, preoperative evaluation, diabetes care Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.445.4255 | Fax: 216.636.1588 Appointments: 216.445.2224 Rosemarie Metzger, MD Specialty Interest(s): Endocrine surgery (thyroid, parathyroid and adrenal) Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.445.3695 | Fax: 216.636.0662 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Jamie Mitchell, MD Specialty Interest(s): Endocrine surgery (thyroid, parathyroid and adrenal), laparoscopic solid organ surgery, advanced laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors Location(s): Main campus; Independence Family Health Center; Solon Family Health Center Office: 216.445.9713 | Fax: 216.636.0662 Appointments: Main campus, 216.444.6568; Independence, 216.986.4000; Solon, 440.519.6800 Joyce J. Shin, MD Specialty Interest(s): Endocrine surgery (thyroid and parathyroid), advanced laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopic adrenalectomy, neuroendocrine tumors, thyroid/parathyroid ultrasound, intra-abdominal ultrasound, laparoscopic radiofrequency thermal ablation of liver tumors Location(s): Main campus; Willoughby Hills Family Health Center Office: 216.636.9365 | Fax: 216.636.0662 Appointments: Main campus, 216.444.6568; Willoughby Hills, 440.943.2500 Allan Siperstein, MD Department Chair Specialty Interest(s): Endocrine surgery (thyroid and parathyroid), advanced laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopic thermal ablation of liver tumors, pancreatic endocrine tumors Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.444.5664 | Fax: 216.636.0662 Appointments: 216.444.6568 Visit clevelandclinic.org/EndoStaff for the most current staff listings and locations. Karen Cooper, DO Specialty Interest(s): Bariatric medicine, family medicine, kinesiology and nutrition sciences, exercise instruction Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.445.1114 | Fax: 216.445.1586 Appointments: 216.445.2224 Matthew Kroh, MD Specialty Interest(s): Advanced laparoscopic surgery, bariatric surgery, gastrointestinal surgery, endoscopy, single-incision laparoscopic surgery Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.445.9966 | Fax: 216.444.2153 Appointments: 216.445.2224 Tomasz Rogula, MD, PhD Specialty Interest(s): Advanced laparoscopic surgery, bariatric surgery, gastrointestinal surgery, endoscopy, single-incision laparoscopic surgery Location(s): Main campus; Strongsville Family Health and Surgery Center Office: 216.445.0255 | Fax: 216.445.1586 Appointments: Main campus, 216.445.2224; Strongsville, 440.878.2500 Philip Schauer, MD Department Chair Specialty Interest(s): Bariatric surgery, laparoscopic surgery, gastrointestinal surgery, colon surgery, weight management, hernia surgery, biliary surgery, surgery for GERD Location(s): Main campus Office: 216.444.4794 | Fax: 216.445.1586 Appointments: 216.445.2224 Cle vel and Clinic RESOURCE Guide 24/7 Referrals About Cleveland Clinic Referring Physician Hotline 855.REFER.123 (855.733.3712) Cleveland Clinic is an integrated healthcare delivery system with local, national and international reach. At Cleveland Clinic, 2,800 physicians represent 120 medical specialties and subspecialties. We are a main campus, 18 family health centers, eight community hospitals, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health in Las Vegas, Cleveland Clinic Canada, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City and Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi. In 2012, Cleveland Clinic was ranked one of America’s top 4 hospitals in U.S. News & World Report’s annual “America’s Best Hospitals” survey. The survey ranks Cleveland Clinic among the nation’s top 10 hospitals in 14 specialty areas, and the top hospital in three of those areas. Hospital Transfers 800.553.5056 On the Web at clevelandclinic.org/Refer123 Stay Connected with Us on … Resources for Physicians Referring Physician Center and Hotline Cleveland Clinic’s Referring Physician Center has established a 24/7 hotline — 855.REFER.123 (855.733.3712) — to streamline access to our array of medical services. Contact the Referring Physician Hotline for information on our clinical specialties and services, to schedule and confirm patient appointments, for assistance in resolving service-related issues, and to connect with Cleveland Clinic specialists. Outcomes Data View clinical Outcomes books from all Cleveland Clinic institutes at clevelandclinic.org/outcomes. Clinical Trials We offer thousands of clinical trials for qualifying patients. Visit clevelandclinic.org/clinicaltrials. Physician Directory View all Cleveland Clinic staff online at clevelandclinic.org/staff. CME Opportunities: Live and Online The Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing Education’s website offers convenient, complimentary learning opportunities. Visit ccfcme.org to learn more, and use Cleveland Clinic’s myCME portal (available on the site) to manage your CME credits. Track Your Patient’s Care Online DrConnect is a secure online service providing real-time information about the treatment your patient receives at Cleveland Clinic. Establish a DrConnect account at clevelandclinic.org/drconnect. Executive Education Cleveland Clinic has two education programs for healthcare executive leaders — the Executive Visitors’ Program and the two-week Samson Global Leadership Academy immersion program. Visit clevelandclinic.org/executiveeducation. Critical Care Transport Worldwide Cleveland Clinic’s critical care transport teams and fleet of vehicles are available to serve patients across the globe. To arrange for a critical care transfer, call 216.448.7000 or 866.547.1467 (see clevelandclinic.org/criticalcaretransport). For STEMI (ST elevated myocardial infarction), acute stroke, ICH (intracerebral hemorrhage), SAH (subarachnoid hemorrhage) or aortic syndrome transfers, call toll-free 877.379.CODE (2633). Same-Day Appointments Cleveland Clinic offers same-day appointments to help your patients get the care they need, right away. Have your patients call our same-day appointment line, 216.444.CARE (2273) or 800.223.CARE (2273). Resources for Patients Medical Concierge For complimentary assistance for out-of-state patients and families, call 800.223.2273, ext. 55580, or email [email protected]. Global Patient Services For complimentary assistance for national and international patients and families, call 001.216.444.8184 or visit clevelandclinic.org/gps. MyChart® Cleveland Clinic MyChart® is a secure, online personal healthcare management tool that connects patients to their medical record. Patients can register for MyChart through their physician’s office or by going online to clevelandclinic.org/mychart. MyConsult Cleveland Clinic offers online medical second opinions for more than 1,000 life-threatening and life-altering diagnoses. For more information, visit clevelandclinic.org/myconsult or call 800.223.2237, ext. 43223. 12-END-382 Endocrine Notes | 5 |2012 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Endocrinology & Metabolism Institute Endocrine Notes 9500 Euclid Ave. / AC311 Cleveland, OH 44195 HOSPITALS NATIONAL DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY Cleveland Clinic’s Diabetes and Endocrinology Program is ranked No. 2 in the nation in the annual U.S. News & World Report “America’s Best Hospitals” survey. In This Issue: 2Cleveland Clinic Study Identifies Increased Mortality Risk with Sulfonylureas vs. Metformin 4 Differentiating Normocalcemic Primary Hyperparathyroidism and Secondary Hyperparathyroidism 6Five Important Pillars to Adhere to When Ordering and Interpreting IPSS in Patients with ACTH-Dependent Cushing Syndrome 10 Robotic Bilateral Posterior Adrenalectomy for ACTH-Independent Macronodular Adrenal Hyperplasia Causing Subclinical Cushing Syndrome 12Study Highlights Importance of Screening for Thyroid Cancer in Patients Diagnosed with Cowden Syndrome 14 roposed Clinical Algorithm Targets the Management of P Residual Diabetes Following Bariatric Surgery of Bariatric Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes Extend 16 Btoenefits Improvement, Prevention of Nephropathy Bypass Improves Glucose Homeostasis by Attenuating 18Gastric the Effect of Ghrelin on ß-cell Function 800.223.2273, ext. 46568 20 Publications 26 Live and Online CME Opportunities 27 Current Clinical Trials 28 Staff Directory | 4 |clevelandclinic.org/endonotes