Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Emmanuel Gomez Jennifer Dao Phan Gaëlle Datchoua UEI2 Scientific communication Workshop February 11 & 12, 2010 1 Safe Harbor This is an independent study performed by students from the Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques de Lille. The opinions expressed are our own and not necesarily those of Dendreon. 2 Product: Sipuleucel-T (Provenge®) Laboratory: Dendreon Agent: autologous dendritic cells Indication: asymptomatic metastatic Androgen Independent Prostate Cancer Launch on market: expected for mid-2010 3 A short review of advanced prostate cancer Summary for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and follow-up A medical unmet need? 4 Summary for Prostate Cancer epidemiology 2007 Estimated US Cancer Cases 2007 Estimated US Cancer Deaths 1 Prostate 218,890 (29%) Lung & Bronchus 89,510 (31%) 2 Lung & Bronchus 114,760 (15%) Prostate 27,050 (9%) 3 Colon & Rectum 79,130 (10%) Colon & Rectum 26,000 (9%) Jemal et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;225-249. Prostate cancer Initial diagnosis 85 % localized early disease ~ 18-36 months 60-70% Localized disease 30-40% Relapse disease 15% Metastatic disease 5 Commun Oncol 2007;4:447–452 Diagnosis of advanced prostate cancer Gleason’s score Digital Rectal Examination+Biopsy PSA doubling time Blood test Research of metastases Residual testosteronemia > 50 ng/mL 6 Histological grading of Prostate Cancer Gleason’s grade • The Primary Gleason grade > 50% of the total pattern •The Secondary Gleason grade = 5-50% of the total pattern 1. Small, uniform glands 2. More stroma between glands 3. Distincly infiltrate margins 4. Irregular masses of neoplastic glands • Primary grade + secondary grade = Gleason Score Gleason’s score 2-4 Well differenciated 5-7 Intermediate 8-10 Poorly differentiated 5. Only occasional gland formation 7 http://www.stjohn.org/InnerPage.aspx?PageID=1446 Prostatic Specific Antigen doubling time (PSA DT) • • • • PSA = detectable in the blood PSA ≠ tumoral antigen PSA level ≠ specific of PCa PSA DT = correlated with PCa mortality 8 Adaptated from:J Clin Oncol 23;2005:4975–9 Gleason’s Score + PSA DT = predictive for PCa outcome Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, et al. Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2005;294:433-439. Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, et al. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 1999;281:1591-1597. 9 Asymptomatic metastatic PCa: a medical unmet need Early stage Death Non-Metastatic Androgen Dependant PCa Radical prostatectomy Radiation therapy 1st line hormonal therapy Metastatic Androgen Independant PCa (asymptomatic) 2nd line hormonal therapy? (symptomatic) Castrate Resistant PCa Chemotherapy Prednisone+docetaxel Palliative treatment Bisphosphonates Asymptomatic metastatic PCa : no approved therapies in European guidelines A gap for brand new treatment strategies? Adaptated from : Nature Reviews Cancer 2, 389-396 (May 2002) Progrès en Urologie (2008), Suppl. 7, S343–S348 Commun Oncol 2007;4:447–452 10 Focus on Provenge® (APC-8015, Sipuleucel-T) Active Cellular Immunotherapy Clinical trials and results 11 12 What is Provenge® and how does it work ? • Sipuleucel-T: autologous Active Cellular Immunotherapy Product • Antigen-specific immunotherapy – Immune system geared to respond to a targeted approach – An antigen delivery cassette engages the immune system and activates Antigen Presenting Cells (APC) • Processed ex-vivo – Provides access to more cells – Cells removed from patient’s immunosuppressive environment 13 Main protagonists • Antigen Presenting Cells • T-lymphocytes • Cancer cells • Prostatic Acid Phosphatase /GM-CSF 14 Provenge®, the lead A.C.I. candidate of Dendreon • Cancer: immunoevasive environment • ACI platform focused on T-cell activation • Tumor associated antigens APCs T-cells activation, proliferation • Challenge: Activate APCs while avoiding the tolerance mechanisms • Isolated autologous APCs manufacturing facilities exposed to a fusion recombinant protein = antigen highly expressed in prostate cancers • Loaded with antigens, the APCs are infused back T-cells activation 15 How do APCs and antigen-specific T cells find each other? BLC SLC ELC T zone stromal cell (producing CCL21) Antigen-bearing DCs and T cells find each other by: • migrating to a common microenvironment within secondary lymphoid organs • DCs stop in T zone while T cells migrate rapidly through the zone surveying the DCs for MHC-peptide complexes 16 Antigen Presentation to T Cells Th1/Th2 pathway Macrophage/ B cell activation Cytotoxic effect against targeted cells Secondary lymphoid organs Peripheral tissues (BARAS, LICHTMAN, Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Saunders ed., 5e ed., 2003) 17 How to break the tolerance Peptide TCR - CD 3 MHC peptide Complexe, I or II CD 4 – CD8 CD 40 L CD 28 CD 2 LFA - 1 T-Cell CD 40 B7 (CD80 and CD86) LFA - 3 ICAM – 1(=CD54) Antigen Presenting Cells Flow Chart • Leukapheresis: for each patient, for each dose • Culture Lab: fraction containing APCs is isolated 2 subsequent centrifugation steps • Cells are cultured with the Antigen Delivery Cassette PA2024 – Recombinant PAP fused with GM-CSF – Prostatic Acid Phosphatase: expressed in 95% of all prostate cancers • After 36-44 hours in culture, cell product is ready: Sipuleucel-T – Immunologically active peptide fragments are displayed on the dendrites – Co-stimulatory molecules (CD54+, CD80+ …) are upregulated – No free GM-CSF is present in the infused product • Transported back to the patient for infusion 19 Patient management • Three leukapheresis procedures – Performed at a local blood bank or at the hospital – Standard 1,5 -2,0 volume leukapheresis is collected – 4 hours • Baseline, week 2 and week 4 – First dose primes the immune system • Cultured product arrives at the infusion center 2 days after WBC collection. • 30-60 minutes to infuse • Infusion-related reactions: – primarily fevers and rigors – Typically readily manageable – Generally resolved within 1 or 2 days. 20 APCs and fusion protein • Antigen presenting cells: – Phenotype: HLA DR +, CD3 -, CD 14-, CD16 - and CD 20 – Ability to elicit primary and secondary immune responses when cocultured with human lymphocytes in culture. • PA2024: the Antigen Delivery CassetteTM triggers the stimulation of T-cell immunity. – « Significant survival benefit » – APC activation correlates with survival 21 Quality control of final product • The activation of APC is measured by CD54 (ICAM-1) upregulation – – • IL2 secretion dependant on CD54 and CD80/CD86 expression by APCs. Th1 – microglia upregulted the surface expression of MHC class II, CD40, and CD54 molecules. CD54 Upregulation across clinical trials (Fluorescence Intensity) S= sipuleucel-T, P= placebo - Swain, S. L., M. Croft, C. Dubey, L. Haynes, P. Rogers, X. Zhang, L. M. Bradley. 1996. From naive to memory T cells. Immunol. Rev. 150:143 - The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 164: 1705-1712. Functional Maturation of Adult Mouse Resting Microglia into an APC Is Promoted by Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor and Interaction with Th1 Cells Francesca Aloisi et al 22 Clinical Trials and Publications 23 Clinical development program of Sipuleucel-T Phase I & II Phase III Completed Phase III Ongoing AIPC Study P07-2 (ProACT) Study P09-1 (OpenACT) ADPC AIPC Study I (Protocol D9901) Study II & III ADPC Study P-11 (PROTECT) (Protocol D9902A&B) Study P07-1 (NeoACt) 24 Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial Overall Survival D9901 25 APC Activation Correlates with Survival D9901 and D9902 26 The Innate Immune System also engaged • • NK lytic activity observed in Sipuleucel-T for each of 3 subjects at Week 2 (Dose2) NK effector cell activity measured by the killing of K562 target cells in vitro • Sipuleuce-T contains APCs and other mononuclear cells sucha as: T-Cells, NK Cells and B-Cells It engages both the adaptive and innate arms of the immune system 27 T-cell Mediated Immune Response Week 0 to Week 8, Study D9901 Median Stimulation Index ratio 18 16 p=0.003 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Sipuleucel-T (Mean=16,9) Placebo (Mean=1,9) 28 pg/nL Cytokine Signature of Activated T cells observed in Sipuleucel-T after first priming dose • Sipuleucel-T Dose 1, Week 0; Dose 2, Week 2; Dose 3, Week 4 • • First dose primes the immune system Activated T-cells present in Dose 2 and 3 (Week 2 and Week 4) 29 Randomized Phase 3 IMPACT Trial (9902B) (Immunotherapy Prostate AdenoCarcinoma Treatment) Primary endpoint: Overall survival Secondary endpoint: Time to objective disease progression 30 Consistency Across Phase 3 Studies *Unadjusted Cox model & log rank **Cox model adjusted for PSA and LDH 31 Keep an eye on … Sipuleucel-T n / N (%) Placebo n / N (%) Odds Ratio (95% CI) p-value All CVA’s 18 /461 (3.9%) 6/231 (2.6%) 1.52 (0.596, 3.892) 0.510 Deaths attributed to CVAs 7 / 461 (1.5%) 2 / 231 (0.9%) 1.76 (0.364, 8.566) 0.725 Group All Subjects AIPC (Proposed Indication) All CVA’s 17 / 345 (4.9%) 3 / 172 (1.7%) 2.92 (0.84, 10) 0.092 Deaths attributed to CVAs 7 / 345 (2.0%) 2 / 172 (1.2%) 1.76 (0.36, 8.6) 0.724 1 / 116 (0.9%) 3 / 59 (5.1%) 0.16 (0.016, 1.596) 0.112 0 0 --- --- ADPC (P-11) All CVA’s Deaths attributed to CVAs 32 PROTECT (P11): PROVENGE Treatment and Early Cancer Treatment. Ongoing Phase 3 trial with enrollment completed 33 Open Trials (Phase II) - AIPC • P09-1 (OpenACT - Open-Label Active Cellular ImmunoTherapy) – An open-label study of Sipuleucel-T in men with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) – Objective: To provide sipuleucel-T to men with metastatic CRPC while marketing approval is being pursued, obtain safety data, evaluate the magnitude of immune responses to treatment with sipuleucel-T, and to further characterize the cellular components of sipuleucel-T. • P07-2 (ProACT – Treatment of PROstate cancer with ACI) – A randomized, multicenter, single blind study in men with metastatic androgen independent prostate cancer to evaluate Sipuleucel-T manufactured with different concentrations of PA2024 antigen. – Objective: To compare the cumulative CD54 upregulation ratio between each of the cohorts, evaluate the magnitude of the immune response in each of the cohorts, and evaluate the overall survival in each of the cohorts . 34 Open Trials (Phase II & IIIB) – ADPC • P07-1 (NeoACT- NEOadjuvant Active Cellular ImmunoTherapy) – An open-label, Phase 2 trial of immunotherapy with Sipuleucel-T as Neoadjuvant treatment in men with localized prostate cancer – Objective: To assess the safety of and immune response induced by sipuleucel-T in men with localized prostate cancer. • P11 (PROTECT – PROvenge Treatment and Early Cancer Treatment) – Phase IIIB trial for patients with hormone sensitive prostate cancer – Objective: To determine if Provenge is effective for treatment of early stage, non-metastatic prostate cancer . 35 Challenges for Provenge® Supply chain Regulatory Affairs 36 37 Sipuleucel-T (Provenge®) production and delivery Apheresis Center Dendreon’s facility Doctor’s Office Day 1 Leukapheresis Day 2-3 Manufacturing Day 3-4 Infusion COMPLETE COURSE OF THERAPY: 3 CYCLES 100 000 patients in USA with metastatic AIPC in 2010 100 000 X 3 = 300 000 doses to prepare and to deliver on time How will Dendreon make it? PROVENGE® (sipuleucel-T) Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee Meeting March 29, 2007 The Mattson Jack Group, Cancer Metric Database 2009 38 Advance Planning System (APS) • APS facilitates the management of Provenge’ supply chain: Enables automated scheduling of patients’ appointments Provides electronic notification to apheresis centers and physicians Notifies logistics firms of expected shipping and delivery times 39 Track patients sample through process using barcode • Apheresis center: cells are barcoded with specific information • Dendreon facility: the patient’s specific barcod is scanned to: - verify that the cells are arrived - notify the manufacturing team • As they travelled through the manufacturing plant the barcod is scanned and verified • Each patient’s cells are assigned and delivered to a specific workstation. 40 Exemple of a workstation to manufacture Provenge 41 Transportation • Courier logistics provided by world class third party Specialize in time delivery of materials Performing this type of transportation for years • Make use of commercial airlines 42 Manufacturing sites location SDI, PCa Patient Population 2006 43 Product Follow-Up 44 Regulatory aspects 45 Patents • Methods for inducing a natural killer (NK) cell-mediated immune response and for increasing NK cell activity Oct 2008 • Immunotherapeutic compositions and methods for the treatment of moderately to well differentiated cancers – Apr 2004 • Composition and method for inducing an immune response against tumour-related antigens – Oct 1998 • Isolated Nucleic Acid Molecule Encoding Cancer Associated Antigen, The Antigen Itself, And Uses Thereof Apr 1998 • Immunostimulatory composition and method – Jul 1997 • Method for in vitro proliferation of dendritic cells, composition containing the cells entrapped in a threedimensional matrix and use for immunization – Jan 1997 46 Regulatory Strategy in US • Basis of licensure – Improvement in overall survival – Pivotal study IMPACT • Special Protocol Assessment • FDA agreement that positive results sufficient to amend the BLA – Supportive studies D9901 and D9902A – Highly favorable benefit to risk profile • Submit BLA amendment mid-november 2009 – FDA decision by may 2010 47 FDA Decision on Provenge: Who’s who, who’s connected ? www.caretolive.com/research 48 Regulatory framework in Europe (1) • First of all, need to define the product: – biological product – cellular therapy product – more than minimally manufactured Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) (Annex IV of directive 2003/63) • Somatic cell therapy medicinal product means a biological medicinal product which has the following characteristics: (a) contains or consists of cells or tissues that have been subject to substantial manipulation so that biological characteristics, physiological functions or structural properties relevant for the intended clinical use have been altered, or of cells or tissues that are not intended to be used for the same essential function(s) in the recipient and the donor; (directive 2009/120) (b) is presented as having properties for, or is used in or administered to human beings with a view to treating, preventing or diagnosing a disease through the pharmacological, immunological or metabolic action of its cells or tissues. 49 Regulatory framework in Europe (2) 50 Regulation 1394/2007: Consequences • For products within the scope: – No marketing without prior authorisation – Assessment of the Quality, Safety & Efficacy – Post-authorisation vigilance; specific obligation for safety and for efficacy Pharmacovigilance plan, Efficacy follow-up plan • Authorisation via the centralized procedure mandatory • Same dossier as for a medicinal product (CTD) with technical adaptations • CAT: Committee for Advanced Therapies – – – – New Committee within the EMA pooling of Community expertise multidisciplinary nature: biotechnology, medical devices, risk management, ethics, … representation of Civil Society and Research Community – Tasks: dossier assessment, classification, scientific advice, guidelines, certification Technical Guidances available: Human cell-based medicinal products: CHMP/410869/06 51 Best option for Dendreon in Europe • Licensing Provenge (already planned) • Centralized procedure for marketing authorization • Several platforms in Europe for industrial process. • Potential parternships based in France – Sound regulatory department to support the project in EU – Quality management for those specific products 52 Dendreon Company overview Dendreon’s pipeline Projection sales of Provenge (US/EU) 53 Targeting cancer, transforming lives™ 54 Dendreon Corporation • • • • Created in 1992 NASDAQ : DNDN Headquarters: Seattle, WA Facilities: – Morris Plains, NJ – Atlanta, GA – Los Angeles, CA • ~ 232 people • R&D and marketing of innovative therapeutics that harness the immune system to fight cancer (Active Cellular Immunotherapy) . 55 Dendreon’s pipeline (1) Sipuleucel- T (PROVENGE) Lapuleucel-T (NEUVENGE) Mature autologous DCs obtained via leukapheresis procedure Targets the HER2/neu Ag. Same process as sipuleucel-T. Preclinical Program: CA-9 and CEA Dendreon website Treatment of metastatic androgenindependent prostate cancer (AIPC). Phase 3 The treatment of breast, ovarian and colorectal solid tumors Phase 2 carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9). CA9 colon and cervical cancer. carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). CEA lung & breast cancer. Preclinic 56 Dendreon’s pipeline (2) 57 58 Sales and income Millions US$ When and How will they make Money? 59 2009 THOMSON REUTERS Financial analysis (stock price) 60 Wholesale price of Provenge® • Manufacturing costs – manufacturing facilities – leukapheresis providers – physician infusion centers • Transportation • R&D and marketing • It is difficult to forecast its price because it is the first active imunotherapy in advanced prostate cancer 61 US sales projection (2011-2019) 62 EU sales projection (2011-2019) 63 Strengths Weaknesses • First ACI product to demonstrate improvement in overall survival for cancer • Mechanism unknown • Engages both the adaptative and innate immune system •Manufacturing process necessary to ensure the safety standards •Patient quality of life (no pre/post medications, short duration of therapy) •Lack of financial resources •No product out of the market • Autologous: few ethical question, regulatory aspect easier •Safety analysis about CVA ? About autoimmune diseases ? •Less toxic vs. chemo •Exclusive patent rights •Lack of study Sipuleucel vs. Docetaxel Opportunities Sipuleucel-T • Potential to create new paradigm in treatment of cancer •ACI for Renal Cell Cancer, Bladder cancer… •Future innovation & technological advances •Patients request • No competition from generics expected for yrs •Niche products with high potential market penetration Threats • FDA denial • Leader opinion denial •Limit of large scale transposition ? •Export outside USA regulatory questions … •Unfavorable results from R&D & clinical trials 64 What’s next for Dendreon ? 65 Best option for Dendreon in Europe • Licensing Provenge (already planned) • Centralized procedure for marketing authorization • Several platforms in Europe for industrial process. • Potential parternships based in France – Sound regulatory department to support the project in EU – Quality management for those specific products 66 Any idea?… - Big pharma specialized in vaccines-like: - Biotechnology which better knows personalized treatment and its regulatory pressure - Firms specialized in cellular therapies 67 68 Thanks for your attention! Any question? 69