Download Claus H. Nielsen, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Chickenpox wikipedia , lookup

Diagnosis of HIV/AIDS wikipedia , lookup

Human cytomegalovirus wikipedia , lookup

Middle East respiratory syndrome wikipedia , lookup

African trypanosomiasis wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Pre-existing antibodies to biologics:
Predictive for treatment outcome?
Claus H. Nielsen
Professor, Ph.D., M.D., M.Sc.
Institute for Inflammation Research
Dept. of Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology
Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
Appearance of serum sickness-like reactions during
treatment with rituximab
•
In a study on Sjögrens disease HACAs were formed in 4 of 8 patients, 3
of these developed SSLR (Pijpe J, Arthritis Rheum 2005)
•
In children with ITP, RTX caused SSLRs in 5 out of 60 (Bennet et al.
Blood 2006; Wang et al., J Pediatr 2005).
•
In a study on Graves’ disease 3 of 10 patients developed SSLR (el Fassi
et al.,J Endocrin Invest, 2011)
Serum sickness like reactions (SSLR)
Arthralgia, skin eruptions, fever, lymphadenopathy
Demonstration of circulating complement-opsonized immune complexes
P=0.01
P= 0.008
#10
100
100
P=0.004
#3
#3
0
0
TX
R
+
-R
TX
TX
+
R
TX
R
+
-R
TX
R
TX
+
R
TX
-25
Anti-IgG/IgA/IgM
+
#10
0
-R
TX
25
TX
#10
#5
#5
R
#3
P= 0.04
P= 0.003
200
#5
MFI
MFI
50
200
MFI
100
75
P= 0.01
300
+
P= 0.01
125
C3
C
IgG
B
IgM
A
An anti-C3-capture ELISA developed with anti-IgG/IgA/IgM confirmed
El Fassi et al. J Endocrinol Invest 2011; 34: e163-e167
Basic conundrum
How can you develop antibody responses
when no B cells are present?
Is there a pre-existing immune response to rituximab?
Ongoing production of pre-existing antibodies by plasma cells?
Study on endometrial protein PP14:
81% of male sera were false-positive
False-positive reactions in two-site immunoassays
Detecting Ab
Analyte
Coating Ab
False-positive reactions in two-site immunoassays
Detecting Ab
Cross-binding anti-mouse Ig Ab
Coating Ab
Kricka et al. Clin Chem 1999; 45: 942-56
Prevalence of antibodies causing false-positive reactions
What are they?
HAAAs: Human anti-animal antibodies
HAMAs: Human anti-mouse antibodies
HACAs: Human anti-chimeric antibodies
HAHAs: Human anti-human antibodies
Heterophilic antibodies
HAAAs versus Heterophilic Antibodies
Heterophilic antibodies
Immunoglobulin
Group I
Anti-Fab
(85% of positive
samples)
Group II
Anti-Fc
(15% of positive
samples)
Negative
samples
Mouse
+++
+++
-
Rat
+++
-
-
Goat
+++
-
-
Horse
+++
+++
-
Rabbit
-
+++
-
Cow
+++
+++
-
BSA (neg. Control)
-
-
-
Hennig et al.
Chung et al., N Engl J Med 2008; 358;1109-17
Anaphylactic reactions to cetuximab
caused by pre-existing IgE antibodies to the α-gal epitope
Produced in mouse hybridoma cells
All humans have IgG antibodies specific for the oligosaccharide galactoseα-1,3-galactose, which is closely related to substances in the ABO blood group
Our assay
HRP-straptavidin
Anti-human γ-chain
biotin
Proband
serum/plasma
Coating:
F(Ab’)2 of IFX, RTX
or murine IgG
IgG antibodies against mouse Fab, anti-IFX Fab
and anti–RTX Fab are common in human plasma
T-helper
cells
Anti-mouse Fab, anti-IFX Fab and anti–RTX Fab correlate
r2=0.90, p < 0.0001
r2=0.90, p < 0.0001
r2=0.90, p < 0.0001
Cross-reactivity between anti-IFX and anti-mIgG
M o u s e Ig G F ( a b ') 2
1000
800
800
600
600
m U /L
1000
400
200
200
0
0
G
400
A
A
n
n
ti
ti
-I
F
-m
X
o
F
u
s
(a
e
b
')
Ig
2
Mouse IgG
column
m U /L
IF X F ( a b ') 2
M o u s e Ig G F ( a b ') 2
1000
800
800
600
600
400
400
200
0
0
ti
n
A
n
ti
-I
-m
F
o
X
u
F
s
e
(a
b
Ig
')
2
200
G
m U /L
1000
A
Infliximab
column
m U /L
IF X F ( a b ') 2
Clinical study
Observational, retrospective, single center study
29 patients with Crohn’s disease treated with infliximab
21 patients with ulcerative colitis treated with infliximab
Measurement of pre-existing anti-infliximab-Fab Abs
and clinical responses
Steenholdt et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37: 1172-83
Pre-existing anti-IFX Fab IgG:
Prevalence in IBD patients naïve to ‘biologics’
Steenholdt et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37: 1172-83
Pre-existing anti-IFX Fab IgG:
Association with 1 year remission on IFX
Steenholdt et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37: 1172-83
8
Pre-existing anti-IFX Fab IgG:
Levels associated with 1 year remission in CD
Anti-IFX Fab Ab cut-off
Sensitivity
Specificity
mU/l
% [95%CI]
% [95%CI]
Identification of patients in remission
<439
100 [63–100]
67 [43–85]
Identification of patients not in remission
≥61
100 [84–100]
25% [3–65]
Optimal differentiation between patients in
233
75 [35–97]
76 [53–92]
remission or not (sensitivity=specificity)
Steenholdt et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37: 1172-83
9
Primary vs. secondary non-responders
TNF-α inhibitor
1/3
Primary
responder
1/3
Probably patients without
”TNF-driven disease”
Primary non-responder
1/3
Secondary
nonresponder
Continue TNF-α
inhibitor
Other modalities
Other TNF-inhibitor
Ususally loss of response due to ADAs
Pre-existing antibodies indicate priming
Efficacy by anti-IFX Fab Abs
Crohn's disease
A
p=0.05
Pre-existing anti-IFX Fab Ab (mU/l)
10000
p=0.397
1000
p<0.01
692
308
91
100
10
Primary non-response Loss of response
n=8
n=7
Remisson
n=8
Steenholdt et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37: 1172-83
10
Pre-existing T-cell responses may support development
of drug-neutralizing antibodies
Mouse IgG
Heterophilic BCR
T-helper cell with specificity for
xenogenic peptide
Antigen
receptor (BCR)
B cell
MHC II
TCR
Th cell
Pre-existing T-cell responses may support development
of drug-neutralizing antibodies
Drug
BCR recognizing
idiotype of drug
B cell
MHC II
T-helper cell with specificity for
xenogenic peptide
TCR
Th cell
Safety by anti-IFX Fab Abs
All patients
Steenholdt et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37: 1172-83
10
”Positive samples”
Meta-analysis by Xu & Rup
31 studies: 1331 patients & 499 controls
What are the antigenic determinants?
Xenogenic part
F(ab’)2
Glycosylation
Origin of pre-existing antibodies?
Heterophilic antibodies
Immunoglobulin
Group I
Anti-Fab
(85% of positive
samples)
Group II
Anti-Fc
(15% of positive
samples)
Negative
samples
Mouse
+++
+++
-
Rat
+++
-
-
Goat
+++
-
-
Horse
+++
+++
-
Rabbit
-
+++
-
Cow
+++
+++
-
BSA (neg. Control)
-
-
-
Hennig et al.
Cross-reactivity between cow IgG, mouse Fab and infliximab
E lu a te
Anti-IFX
Fab
0 .4 5
0 .4 0
O D 490 nm
0 .3 5
Bovine IgG
column
0 .3 0
0 .2 5
0 .2 0
0 .1 5
0 .1 0
0 .0 5
0 .0 0
1
10
100
D ilu t io n 1 :x
E lu a te
Anti-mouse
IgG Fab
0 .4 5
0 .4 0
O D 490 nm
0 .3 5
0 .3 0
0 .2 5
0 .2 0
0 .1 5
0 .1 0
0 .0 5
0 .0 0
1
10
D ilu t io n 1 :x
100
Origin: Possibly vaccines
Conclusions regarding pre-existing antibodies
• exist against chimeric antibodies (IFX, RTX, CTX)
• are presumably ”heterophilic antibodies”
• apparently predict outcome of infliximab therapy in Crohn’s disease
• may cause IgG- or IgE-mediated infusion reactions
• may be induced by vaccination
Thanks to:
Yaseelan Palarasah, Christina Aniol-Nielsen, Casper Steenholdt, Børge Teisner
Everybody at Institute for Inflammation Research