Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
eStudy.us Monopoly Market Structure – A classification system for the key traits of a market, including • the number of firms, • the similarity of the products they sell, and • the ease of entry and exit Monopoly one firm with market power unique product (no close substitutes) impossible entry and exit price maker (monopoly company sets the price) firm demand curve is downward sloping (must discount to sale more) copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Monopoly Barriers to Entry and Exit Legal barriers – Licenses – Patents and copyrights – Public franchises – Tariffs, quotas and other trade restrictions Strategic barriers – Predatory pricing – Marketing (product differentiation) Structural barriers – Economies of scale (Natural monopoly) – Vertical integration – Control of essential resources (technologies / commodities) – Brand loyalty copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Revenue with Market Power TR PQ TR TR1 TR0 MR Q Q1 Q0 Q P TR MR 0 $21 $0 ---- 1 $19 $19 $19 2 $17 $34 $15 3 $15 $45 $11 $20 4 $13 $52 $7 $15 5 $11 $55 $3 $10 6 $9 $54 - $1 7 $7 $49 - $5 8 $5 $40 - $9 9 $3 $27 - $13 MR P $25 $5 D $0 -$5 -$10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MR copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Short-run Equilibrium Q P TR MR TFC TVC TC MC AFC AVC ATC Profit 0 $21 $0 ---- $10 $0 $10 ---- $10 $0 $10.00 -$10 1 $19 $19 $19 $10 $4 $14 $4 $10 $4.00 $14.00 $5 2 $17 $34 $15 $10 $7 $17 $3 $5 $3.50 $8.50 $17 3 $15 $45 $11 $10 $11 $21 $4 $3.33 $3.67 $7.00 $24 4 $13 $52 $7 $10 $18 $28 $7 $2.50 $4.50 $7.00 $24 5 $11 $55 $3 $10 $28 $38 $10 $2.00 $5.60 $7.60 $17 6 $9 $54 - $1 $10 $47 $57 $19 $1.67 $7.83 $9.50 -$3 7 $7 $49 - $5 $10 $74 $84 $27 $1.43 $10.57 $12.00 -$35 8 $5 $40 - $9 $10 $112 $122 $38 $1.25 $14.00 $15.25 -$82 9 $3 $27 - $13 $10 $162 $172 $50 $1.11 $18.00 $19.11 -$145 copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Short-run Equilibrium Profit maximization – When MR > MC – increase production – When MR < MC – decrease production – When MR = MC – Maximum profit • Produce quantity where MR = MC • Intersection of the marginal-revenue curve and the marginal-cost curve copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Short-run Equilibrium Profit Max: MR = MC $25 MC ATC AVC D MR $0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Short-run Equilibrium $25 MC ATC AVC When Q=4 Revenue $13.00 P $52 TVC $18 TFC $7.00 ATC $4.50 AVC $10 Total Cost $28 Profit $24 D MR $0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Natural Monopoly Natural Monopoly – Infinite economics of scale leading to a single company having lowest cost $ National law allows for natural monopoly so long firms surrender pricing power AC Q Water service Sewer service Power service Regulation: should try to price near perfect competition (P = MC) rather than (P > MC) Should a municipality own these services? Regulators generally do a poor job protecting society interest. Case: Power service in Lubbock, TX and San Diego, CA Trash service Is trash collection a natural monopoly? copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Long Run View Monopoly allocates resources inefficiently $ Pm > Ppc and Qm < Qpc AC MC Pm Ppc Dperfect competition Dmonopoly MR Qm Qpc Q copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Inefficiency of monopoly Monopoly produces quantity where MC = MR – which produces less than the socially efficient quantity of output – charges a Price > Marginal Cost – which creates a deadweight loss (triangle between the demand curve and marginal cost curve) copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Inefficiency of monopoly $ Deadweight Loss Marginal Cost Pmonopoly Demand Marginal Revenue 0 Qmonopoly Qefficient Quantity • Monopoly charges a price above marginal cost and not all consumers who value the good at more than its cost • Quantity produced and sold by a monopoly is below the socially efficient level • Deadweight loss is represented by the area of the triangle between the demand curve (which reflects the value of the good to consumers) and the marginal-cost curve (which reflects the costs of the monopoly producer) copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Price Discrimination Sell the same good at different prices to different customers Price Discrimination is a rational strategy to increase profit • Charge each customer a price closer to his or her willingness to pay • Sell more than is possible with a single price Requires the ability to separate customers according to their willingness to pay • Certain market forces can prevent firms from price discriminating • Arbitrage – buy a good in one market, sell it in other market at a higher price copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Price Discrimination Can raise economic welfare by eliminating the inefficiency of monopoly pricing • More consumers get the good • Higher producer surplus (higher profit) Without price discrimination • • • • Single price > MC Consumer surplus Producer surplus (Profit) Deadweight loss Perfect price discrimination • Charge each customer a different price • Exactly his or her willingness to pay • Monopolist - gets the entire surplus (Profit) • No deadweight loss copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Price Discrimination (a) Monopolist with Single Price (b) Monopolist with Perfect Price Discrimination Price Price Consumer surplus Deadweight loss Monopoly price Profit Profit Marginal revenue 0 Marginal cost Marginal cost Quantity sold Demand Demand Quantity 0 Quantity sold Quantity Panel (a) shows a monopolist that charges the same price to all customers. Total surplus in this market equals the sum of profit (producer surplus) and consumer surplus. Panel (b) shows a monopolist that can perfectly price discriminate. Because consumer surplus equals zero, total surplus now equals the firm’s profit. Comparing these two panels, you can see that perfect price discrimination raises profit, raises total surplus, and lowers consumer surplus. copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Price Discrimination Examples of price discrimination – Movie tickets – Airline prices – Discount coupons – Financial aid – Quantity discounts copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Public Policy Antitrust and Monopoly Increasing competition with antitrust laws – Sherman Antitrust Act, 1890 • Reduce the market power of trusts – Clayton Antitrust Act, 1914 • Strengthened government’s powers • Authorized private lawsuits – Prevent mergers – Break up companies – Prevent companies from coordinating their activities to make markets less competitive copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Public Policy Regulation and Monopoly – Regulate the behavior of monopolists • Price – Common in case of natural monopolies – Marginal Cost pricing $ ATC Regulated price Loss ATC MC D 0 Quantity • May be less than ATC • No incentive to reduce costs copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Public Policy Ownership and Monopoly – Private owners • Incentive to minimize costs (maximize profit) – Public owners (government owned) • If government does a bad job • Losers are the customers and taxpayers copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Summary Competition vs. Monopoly Comparison Competition Monopoly Goal of firms Maximize profits Maximize profits Rule for maximizing MR = MC MR = MC Can earn economic profits in short run? Yes Yes Number of firms Many One Marginal revenue MR = P MR < P Price P = MC P > MC Produces welfare-maximizing level of output? Yes No Entry in long run? Yes No Can earn economic profits in long run? No Yes Price discrimination possible? No Yes Similarities Differences copyright © michael [email protected] 2010, All rights reserved