Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
www.who.int/ceh/capacity/noise.pdf …….. Children and noise MAGNITUDE AND EFFECTS OF SOUND COMMON EXAMPLE dBA EFFECT Breathing Conversation at home Freeway traffic (15 m), vacuum cleaner, noisy party Average factory, train (at 15 m) Jet take-off (at 305 m), motorcycle Thunderclap, textile loom, chain saw, siren, rock concert Toy cap pistol, Jet takeoff (at 25 m), firecracker 0-10 Hearing threshold 50 Quiet Annoying, intrusive, interferes with 70 phone use Possible hearing damage 80 100 Damage if over 1 minute 120 Human pain threshold 150 Eardrum rupture VULNERABILITY OF CHILDREN Why might children be more susceptible to noise effects? � Possible increased risk due to immaturity Increased cochlear susceptibility? In utero Animal data studies � Critical periods in relation to learning � Lack of developed coping repertoires � Vulnerable tasks \ Vulnerable settings (schools, home, streets) What might be the implications of noise effects? � Lifelong impairment of learning and education � Short-term deficit followed by adaptation � Non intentional lesions FROM EXCESS NOISE EXPOSURE �Direct ear damage • Noise induced hearing loss • Noise induced threshold shift �Indirect adverse effects • Physiological effects • Psychological effects �Impaired cognition PSYCHOLOGICAL DAMAGE � Exposure to moderate level of noise can cause • Psychological stress • Annoyance, interference with activity, isolation • Headache, tiredness and irritability; may impair intellectual function and performance of complex tasks � Exposure to intense level of noise can • Cause personality changes and aggressive/violent reactions • Reduce ability to cope • Alter work performance and intellectual function • May cause muscle spasm and also break a bone (when combined with strong vibration) •Sleep disturbance •Changes in mental health. � Exposure to sudden, unexpected noise can cause • Startle reaction with stress responses • Cause non intentional injuries INDIRECT ADVERSE EFFECTS �Stress-related somatic effects • Stress hormone • Blood pressure • Muscle spasm �Psychological effects • Annoyance / Isolation • Sleep disturbance • Mental health �Cognitive effects • Reading, concentration, memory, attention . IMPAIRED COGNITIVE FUNCTION Chronic noise exposure impairs cognitive function Reading comprehension Long term memory � Dose-response relationships • Supported by both laboratory and field studies � Study of possible mechanisms and noise reduction interventions Tuning out of attention / concentration Impairment of auditory discrimination RAILWAY NOISE AND READING SCORES � Reading scores compared between classes in same school � Exposed/not exposed to railway noise � No selection of children into classes � Poorer performance on achievement test on noisy side � Measuring reading age 3-4 months behind on noisy side . IN PRE-SCHOOL AND SCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN EFFECTS OF NOISE � Hearing impairment • In isolated cases by toys or equipment � Sleep disturbances • Earlier responses than adults (EEG awakenings) � Somatic effects • Blood pressure and stress hormones � Psycho-social effects No studies on behaviour with high environmental noise levels Cognitive tasks are impaired, like reading, long term memory, attention and motivation � Vocal nodule’ “ Bronzaft, A.L. and McCarthy, D.P. (1975) The effect of elevated train noise on reading ability. Environment and Behaviour, 7(4), “( A 2x2x2 analysis of variance performed on the word knowledge and reading comprehension scores of the children in the matched classes of the 1974 academic year yielded a significant main effect for location( F= 7.270,df= 1,57,p< .01). Students on the noisy side of the school building did more poorly on the achievement tests than those on the quiet side of the building (see Table 1). Finding a significant relationship between train noise and depressed reading scores tends to support the Deutsch (1964) and Cohen et al. (1973) hypothesis which states that low reading achievement may be related to exposure to noise interference through the mediation of impaired auditory dis-crimination. Their speculation that difficulty in learning how to read may be related to the tendency of a child reared (or in this case, taught) in a noisy environment to block out indiscriminately all sound, whether relevant speech cues or not, is one plausible explanation of the present finding. Since Stempler (1973) reported that at least 11% of classroom teaching time is lost daily because of passing trains, it is possible that lower test scores on the noisy side of the school building may be the result of lost teaching time.” Glass and Singer (1972a), through an extensive survey of previous noise research and their own studies on noise adaptation, found that, following exposure to unpredictable and uncontrollable high-intensity noise, the often reported after- effects were: degradation in quality of task performance, lowered frustration tolerance, and impaired ability to resolve cognitive conflicted, Shield,B. and Dockrell, J. (2002), The effects of environmental noise on child academic attainments. Proc. Institute of Acoustics 24(6). Shield, B., Dockrell, J., Asker R. and Tachmatzidis, I. (2002) The effects of noise on the attainments and cognitive development of primary school children. Final report for Department of Health and DETR. eab.sagepub.com/content/7/4/517.full.pdf+html .