Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Microbial spoilage, quality and safety within the context of meat sustainability Linda Saucier Department of Animal Science, Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Science, Université Laval, Quebec City, Québec, Canada, G1V 0A6 Prof. Linda Saucier PhD, agr, chm Départment des sciences animales Faculté des sciences de l’agriculture et de l’alimentation Université Laval Pavillon Paul Comtois, local 4203 2425 rue de L’Agriculture Québec (Québec) G1V 0A6 Canada Tel.: 418-656-2131 | 6295 Fax: 418-656-3766 E-mail: [email protected] 30 31 ABSTRACT Meat is a nutrient-dense food that provides ideal conditions for microbes to grow 32 and defines its perishable nature. Some organisms simply spoil it while others are a threat 33 to our health. In either case, meat must be discarded from the food chain and, being 34 wasted and consequently an environmental burden. Worldwide, more than 20% of the 35 meat produced is either lost or wasted. Hence, coordinated efforts from farm to table are 36 required to improve microbial control as part of our effort towards global sustainability. 37 Also, new antimicrobial systems and technologies arise to better fulfill consumer trends 38 and demands, new lifestyles and markets, but for them to be used to their full extent, it is 39 imperative to understand how they work at the molecular level. Undetected survivors, 40 either as injured, dormant, persister or viable but non-culturable (VBNC) cells, 41 undermine proper risk evaluation and management. 42 43 44 45 Keywords: Feeding strategies, Meat safety, Meat spoilage, Microflora management, 46 Near-death physiology, Survivors 47 48 49 50 51 1. Introduction Even if Lutz, Sanderson & Scherbov (2001) predicted that the world population 52 should stop growing by the end of the century, our number is expected to reach 9.6 53 billion by 2050. Demand for animal-based proteins will continue to rise, but to an extent 54 that will vary from country to country according to various factors such as geography, 55 culture, etc. (Sans & Combris, 2015). A fair part of our food supply will keep travelling 56 the world, but parallel to this, the need to maintain viable agricultural social communities 57 and to buy locally are still very much present. Food security during pandemic outbreaks 58 (e.g., Ebola in West Africa) and related land biosecurity protocols remind us that no one 59 should solely depend on others to feed its people. More than ever, agriculture and food 60 production remain vital economic activities. 61 Integration of agri-food activities from farm to table has closely linked 62 commercial partners and it takes, in this continuum, only one intermediate performing 63 poorly to destroy the efforts of a whole sector of activities. These interactions have 64 fostered traceability protocols, but also liability to one another. Consumer trends and 65 demands continue to drive the food industry whether as mass productions or niche 66 markets (Table 1). Challenges reside in designing safe food without compromising 67 quality and shelf life while responding to consumers’ demands for minimally processed 68 foods with fewer additives, but that remain easy to prepare. Development of novel 69 strategies and antimicrobial systems therefore requires thorough knowledge of the 70 physiological response expressed by microorganisms to be controlled. 71 72 Safety of our meat supply could be challenged in various ways. Except for chemical contaminants build up through reaction with meat constituents (e.g., 73 nitrosamine), chemical contaminants are likely to remain at the same level or to decay 74 with time. This is a major distinction compared to microbial contaminants that have the 75 potential to increase in numbers if the conditions allow growth to occur or resume. With 76 respect to meat sustainability, it can be improved by increasing productivity, but 77 reduction of waste and spoilage is also part of the solution. In this context, microbial 78 control is a major issue. Novel interventions need to be integrated from farm to table and 79 based on a thorough understanding of microbe near-death physiology at the molecular 80 level. In this context, examples of effective microbial control are presented here. 81 82 2. Economic burden of safety, waste, and spoilage 83 WHO (2015) reported 420-960 million foodborne illnesses and 310,000 to 84 600,000 deaths in 2010 representing 25-46 million Disability Adjusted Life Years 85 (DALYs); amongst the culprits, namely Salmonella Typhi and non-typhoidal Salmonella 86 enterica, Campylobacter spp. Taenia solium, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, hepatitis 87 A virus, norovirus and aflatoxin. In terms of food waste, FAO (2011) indicates that 1.3 88 billion tons of food are lost or wasted every year. With respect to meat, more than 20% of 89 the 263 million tons of meat produced worldwide do not reach consumption, which 90 represents 75 million bovines raised for nothing (FAO, 2016). Animal products, 91 including meat, are nutrient dense, but highly perishable food commodities. In order to 92 reduce waste, spoilage, recalls linked to contamination with pathogens, etc. innovative 93 and effective strategies to improve microbial control have to emerge in order to improve 94 our sustainability towards meat and meat products. These new approaches may also 95 include tighter management systems. For example, Moisson Beauce, which is a non-for- 96 profit organization, helps people living with difficult socio-economic situations. It carries 97 many activities like a food bank, reinsertion programs, etc. In partnership with a grocery 98 chain, they have implemented a meat recuperation program in order to reduce waste and 99 to provide beneficiaries with more nutritious foods (Fournier, 2015). In this case, meat is 100 frozen before the best before date and processed in provincially inspected kitchens before 101 being served to beneficiaries of charitable organizations. Alternatively, meat could be 102 sold at some point at a discount price before the end of shelf life. But if the product is not 103 handled properly by the consumer, poor eating experience and safety issues may arise. 104 105 106 3. Microbial control begins at the farm With the exception of lymph nodes, muscles of healthy animals contain little to no 107 microorganisms (Huffman, 2002). Hence, the animal health status prior to slaughter is 108 paramount in securing meat quality and safety. On top of veterinary surveillance, 109 biosecurity measures at the farm must be established to protect the animal from diseases 110 and contamination by undesirable organisms. Obviously, reducing risk of economic 111 losses caused by animal death and herd dissemination is the logical reason to embark on a 112 biosecurity program. On top of biosecurity protocols, many producer associations have 113 developed a HACCP system at the farm. Although, these tend to be more of type 2 114 (minimizing microbial growth) than actual type 1 (procedures where cell counts are 115 reduced, in order to prevent or eliminate hazards), they are deemed valuable with respect 116 to microbial safety (Gill, 2000). 117 Free-range farming is seen as a less intensive system for animal production, but it 118 does, nonetheless, require stockmanship to be done properly and effectively with respect 119 to welfare and productivity. Furthermore, higher incidence of parasitic infection was 120 reported when pigs are raised with access to outdoor facilities compared to more 121 conventional production systems (Eijck & Borgsteede, 2005). So, parameters such as 122 quality of pastures, feed, water facilities, pest and wildlife control, etc. remain important 123 to control disease and contamination that will lead to increased mortality, loss of 124 productivity and more carcass waste. Couple of years ago, pork producer associations in 125 Canada have promoted less severe cooking for whole muscle cuts as “pink cooking” for 126 customers to enjoy a more pleasing eating experience. It was deemed safe considering the 127 microbial quality achieved by producers but such practices would not be recommended 128 for free-range pigs as less severe cooking can lead to safety issues when incidence of 129 parasites is increased. Much to proof that new intervention must be studied thoroughly to 130 avoid introducing unsuspected risks. 131 Before being transported to slaughter houses, animals are submitted to a feed 132 withdrawal to reduce problems associated with motion/transport sickness, notably nausea, 133 vomiting, diarrhea, known to favour contamination to spread between them, but also 134 losses (death or non-ambulatory; Bradshaw et al., 1996; Isaacson et al., 1999; Ritter et al., 135 2006). Pre-slaughter fasting is now a standard procedure and parameters for its proper 136 application vary not only amongst species but also amongst producers. That is why it is 137 deemed preferable to refer to fasting efficacy rather than fasting time. Conversely, a too 138 long fasting will affect animal welfare, as hunger makes them more irritable; fights are 139 more frequent leading to bruises on the carcasses. When they are properly fasted, the 140 volume of the gastro-intestinal (GI) tract is reduced along with risks of perforation during 141 evisceration as well as carcass and equipment contamination. 142 Excessive feed withdrawal will also have a negative effect on carcass yield. With 143 pork, it takes four to eight hours before nutrients gets absorbed by the small intestine and 144 nine hours to reach blood stream. Hence, it takes 10 to 12 h before the feed consumed 145 materialized into carcass gain (Faucitano et al., 2010b). Undigested material left in the 146 digestive tract is an unnecessary expense for the producer and represents an extra waste 147 to manage at slaughter (Murray, 2001). Effective feed withdrawal reduces the incidence 148 of Pale, Soft and Exudative (PSE) meat. If unduly extended, muscle reserves will get 149 exhausted leading to Dark, Firm and Dry (DFD) meat (Faucitano et al., 2010b). Its high 150 pH favours microbial growth, leads to early spoilage of the meat and reduces shelf life. 151 Furthermore, hungry animals may drink more in order to reduce discomfort and water fill 152 up the stomach (Saucier et al., 2007), which is counterproductive with respect to reducing 153 GI tract volume (Rabaste et al., 2007). 154 Many factors are susceptible to influence meat quality including pre-slaughter 155 stress, truck design, seasons, roads, animal density, duration of transport, feed 156 withdrawal, etc. (Faucitano & Schaefer, 2008; Weschenfelder et al., 2012, 2013a, 2013b). 157 In fact, stress inflicted on animals before slaughter may interfere with their health and 158 welfare leading to poor meat quality and microbial contamination (Faucitano et al., 159 2010b). After death, muscles remain metabolically active until reserves are exhausted in 160 anaerobic conditions since breathing has ceased. If the animal is submitted to a prolonged 161 stress before slaughter (e.g., long transport), reserves will get exhausted prior to 162 slaughter, limited production of lactic acid will occur and ultimate pH (pHu) after 24 h of 163 chilling will be higher leading to DFD meat. This higher pH is favourable for microbial 164 growth (Faucitano et al., 2010a), the meat will spoil faster and shelf life will be reduced. 165 However, when pH is higher, myofibrillar proteins are far from their isoelectric point 166 producing a net charge causing repulsion between the fiber networks. Water then has 167 more space and meat retaining it will have a dry appearance. This improved retention 168 leads to reduced cooking losses, better yield and quality in processed meat (Interbev, 169 2006). 170 If stress is inflicted shortly before slaughter (e.g., use of electric prod), it leads to 171 poor quality PSE meat as well as low cooking yield although its low pH refrain microbial 172 growth compared to DFD meat. More recently, intermediate quality classes have been 173 defined in pork, namely, Red, Soft and Exudative (RSE) and Pale, Firm and Non- 174 exudative (PFN). Much remains to be unveiled with respect to this newly suggested 175 classification, but we have demonstrated that, after DFD, RSE meat spoils the fastest 176 (Faucitano et al., 2010a). So, proper pre-slaughter management is important to control 177 contamination and to obtain quality meat with optimized shelf life. 178 179 4. Improving quality and shelf life while reducing waste 180 Many small fruits (e.g., cranberry, strawberry, etc.) and plants (e.g., tea leaves, 181 onions, etc.) contain large amounts of phenolic compounds, including ellagic and gallic 182 acids, which are known for their antimicrobial and antiviral activity in vitro as well as in 183 vivo (Buzzini et al., 2008; Leusink et al., 2010; Rozoy et al., 2013). Cranberry is very rich 184 in proanthocyanidins, which have inhibitory effects on Staphylococcus aureus and 185 Escherichia coli growth in meat (Daglia, 2012) and lipid oxidation in fresh turkey and 186 ground pork meat (Lee, Reed & Richards et al., 2006; Raghavan & Richards, 2006). 187 Essential oils from herbs and spices also demonstrate antimicrobial (Oussalah et al., 188 2007) and antioxidant properties (Botsoglou et al., 2002, 2003, 2004). However, when 189 directly applied to meat, organoleptic concerns arise. 190 It is well documented that feed supplementation with vitamin E improves the 191 oxidative stability of meat (Schaefer et al., 1995). Addition to feed is more effective than 192 on meat (Mitsumoto et al., 1993; Houben & Gerris, 2002; Lahucky et al., 2010) and its 193 action is immediate upon surface exposition to air. By a similar feeding strategy, Soultos 194 et al. (2009) demonstrated that adding oregano oil to the diet of rabbits reduced total 195 mesophilic aerobes, Pseudomonas spp. and Enterobacteriaceae of the carcass after 12 196 days of refrigeration under aerobic conditions. As well, Fortier, Saucier & Guay (2012) 197 improved the microbial quality of pork meat when rations were supplemented with 198 oregano oil and cranberry pulp. The idea here is not to feed farm animals with fruits and 199 plants, but rather with feed enriched with bioactive compounds extracted from plant by- 200 products to improve meat quality and shelf life. Effective use of polyphenols and other 201 bioactive molecules aligns with a global vision for sustainable agriculture and economic 202 efficiency. 203 204 205 5. Microflora management One technology that has ship-shaped meat microbial shelf life in the past few 206 decades is most certainly modified atmosphere packaging. Without any additives or other 207 interventions, but simply by changing composition of the gaseous environment around 208 the meat, we have been able to modulate its microflora in order for less spoiling lactic 209 acid bacteria to prevail over psychrotrophic Pseudomonas, provided that the cold chain is 210 maintained throughout storage and transport (Saucier, 1999). So, this fine-tuning of 211 microbial ecology has led us to keep the microorganisms that we want, at the level that 212 we want, and with the timing that we want. Rather than having a “bazooka” approach, 213 where everything is wiped out, a more targeted “sniper” one eliminating the bad and 214 leaving the good microbes to thrive has proved to be beneficial. In any case, microbial 215 void created by reducing or eliminating endogenous microflora is at risk to be 216 recontaminated and recolonized by opportunistic organisms at post treatment. 217 In 2008, the Canadian meat processing industry was shaken by a listeriosis 218 outbreak where elderly people actually died. Luncheon meat had been contaminated with 219 Listeria monocytogenes from a biofilm found on a slicer (Weatherill, 2009). This incident 220 has led to the implementation of new reforms including approval of two antimicrobials 221 for processed meat (sodium acetate and sodium diacetate) and new regulations with 222 respect to microbial control on surfaces near or touching meats got implemented. One of 223 the hypotheses proposed to explain the presence of L. monocytogenes in meat plants fits 224 with the improvement of sanitation, where only psychrotrophs like L. monocytogenes can 225 survive in cold processing rooms. Drains are difficult to decontaminate since water and 226 organic matter are constantly being flushed through them. Zhao et al. (2006) reported that 227 Listeria sp. can reach 3.6 to 7.5 CFU/1000 cm2 in drains of poultry processing plants and 228 that use of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis with Enterococcus durans at 107 CFU/mL in 229 an enzyme-foam-based cleaning agent can reduce Listeria sp. population after four weeks 230 of treatment. Similarly, a commercial biological product design to control odors in grease 231 traps and drain was tested for its ability to exert a competitive exclusion on Listeria 232 innocua (Fig. 1). Even the way plant activities are laid out will influence the spread of 233 contamination. Lundén et al. (2003) reported that facilities with more compartmentalized 234 activities are less susceptible to contamination spread compared to large processing 235 rooms. 236 6. 237 New technologies to improve meat quality and processing efficiency Biological control using bacteriophages infecting and killing undesirable bacteria 238 have been studied against Pseudomonas in meat (Geer & Dilts, 1990). It was soon 239 realized while controlling a wide group of bacteria, such as members of a whole genus, 240 host range coverage and specificity were important criteria. Although the use of cocktails 241 provides a larger host range and reduces the emergence of phage resistant clones, better 242 success was obtained when phages were used to target specific bacterial species such as 243 E. coli O157:H7 (Table 2; Saucier, Moineau & Fairbrother, 2001), L. monocytogenes 244 (Hagens & Loessner, 2014) and Brochothrix thermosphacta (Greer & Dilts, 2002). To be 245 effective, lytic, not temperate, phages must be used and since most bacterial viruses only 246 multiply in viable and active cells, growth limiting conditions, such as refrigeration, 247 reduce its efficacy. Transducing phages are to be avoided since genetic material could be 248 transferred from cell to cell. Furthermore, contact between phages and bacteria should be 249 optimized otherwise high titers of phages are necessary to provide a significant effect. 250 Commercial phage preparations are available, notably Listex™ consisting of a broad 251 range phage, P100, and ListShield, a cocktail of phages (Hagens & Loessner, 2014). 252 Phage-encoded enzymes, such as endolysins, have been also tested as anti- 253 microbiological agents against Listeria biofilm, although their stability remains an issue. 254 The absence of the outer membrane in Gram positive organisms allows its application 255 externally on Listeria. 256 High efficiency meat tenderizers as well as brine or marinade injectors have been 257 developed to improve eating qualities of less noble cuts. By piercing meat surface with 258 blades or needles, it compromises its integrity allowing microorganisms on the surface to 259 penetrate the core of the muscle similarly to ground beef. It was only a matter of time 260 before meatborne outbreaks got linked to such process. Indeed in 2012, 18 cases of 261 Escherichia coli O157 were linked to such products in Canada (Catford et al., 2013) and 262 prompted the implementation of guidelines for mandatory labelling to provide proper 263 cooking information (Health Canada, 2014). So, on the package of non-intact muscles, it 264 must be indicated: “mechanically tenderized”, “cook to a minimum internal temperature 265 of 63°C (145°F)” and, in the case of steak, “turn steak over at least twice during 266 cooking”. Gill et al. (2014) demonstrated that if steak is turned twice or more while being 267 cooked to 63°C, a 5 Log reduction is obtained. Again, this emphasizes the need to study 268 thoroughly the behavior of microorganisms in food systems when new technologies are 269 introduced and to establish their efficacy and safety. Apart from the O157 serotype, other 270 Shiga-toxin producing E. coli (STEC) namely, O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145, 271 commonly referred to as the “Big Six”, are now considered adulterants in meats and must 272 be controlled as well. 273 274 275 7. Efficacy of antimicrobial systems and cell physiology Various antimicrobial systems are used to control microorganisms in food, including 276 meat, and heat treatments are amongst the oldest and the most widely studied. Métris et 277 al. (2008) demonstrated that recovery time increases with severity of heat treatment. Cell 278 recovery and growth have been traditionally used to assess severity and efficacy of 279 antimicrobial systems (e.g., commercial sterility of canned food). For recovery and 280 detection to happen, however, survivor cells must be able to grow and form colonies on 281 culture media. Injured cells do not grow on selective media (Oliver, 2005; Li et al., 282 2014). To be detected, they must deal first with their injuries in non-selective growth 283 conditions. Stress, including commonly used food preservatives, can induce a viable but 284 non-culturable (VBNC) state (Oliver, 2010; Li et al., 2014). Contrary to injured cells, 285 those in VBNC state cannot grow on any media (Oliver, 2005; Li et al., 2014) but they 286 remain metabolically active whereas dormant cells are not (Pinto, Santos & Chambe, 287 2015). As stated by Li et al. (2014), little is known about the genetic control of these 288 VBNC cells and their age also influences resuscitation time, which can take days or years 289 depending on strains and conditions. Furthermore, they are known to be more resistant to 290 physical and chemical stresses (Li et al., 2014). VBNC state is seen as an adaptive 291 strategy to survive longer under unfavourable conditions. Also, persister cells have been 292 described as a subpopulation of phenotypic non-growing variants associated with 293 antibiotic resistance (Yamaguchi & Inouye, 2011; Li et al., 2014; Leung, Dufour & 294 Lévesque, 2015). Through a toxin-antitoxin (TA) system, they control cellular growth 295 and death that can lead to a “dormant” state. Under stress, induced proteases eliminate the 296 less stable antitoxin and free the toxin. There are three groups of TA systems (I, II and 297 III) based on the antitoxin function and they have been identified in many bacteria; 298 E. coli K12 is known to have 36 TA systems (Yamaguchi & Inouye, 2011). Survivors, 299 either as injured, dormant, persister or VBNC cells, can resuscitate when the conditions 300 are right, notably during storage and transport. So, there is always a possibility that those 301 conditions favouring resuscitation may not be known, and risks associated with 302 undetected survivors remain; they could be dangerous if they are pathogenic and ingested 303 (Olivier, 2010, Rowan, 2004). The efficacy of antimicrobial systems is traditionally 304 evaluated by cell enumeration on solid growth medium during challenge studies. Hence, 305 when viable cells cannot grow to be detected, we overestimate the efficacy of 306 antimicrobial treatments indicating that other markers should complement cell count 307 enumeration to assess risk properly. 308 In order to survive, microorganisms react to antimicrobial systems used to control 309 them and initiate a variety of physiological responses to modify metabolic activity 310 (transcriptome, proteome, etc.), cell structure (e.g., membrane fluidity) or genetic make- 311 up. For example, when exposed to antibiotics, cells can develop tolerance or acquire 312 resistance at genetic level, depending on concentration of antibiotics encountered. 313 General, as well as specific, stress responses have been described in many organisms 314 (Storz & Hengge-Aronis, 2000; Dodd & Aldsworth, 2002; Jones, 2012). The general 315 stress response, under the control of factor RpoS in E. coli, leads to cross protection 316 against other stresses (Lemay et al., 2000; Blackman, Park & Harrison, 2005; Jones, 317 2012). At the molecular level, stress proteins, induced by sub-lethal heat treatment, have 318 been described in several eukaryotes and prokaryotes. The stress response associated with 319 heat shock can also be induced by other factors (ethanol, UV, DNA-gyrase inhibitors) in 320 E. coli and many proteins induced by various stresses have already been identified (Storz 321 & Hengge-Aronis, 2000; Jones, 2012). Organism survival to an inhibitory treatment, such 322 as heat or acid, can be improved by prior exposure to sub-lethal conditions (Storz & 323 Hengge-Aronis, 2000; Seyer et al., 2003; Jones, 2012). Interestingly, heat shock proteins 324 protect E. coli cells against freezing but not chilling conditions (Chow, & Tung, 1998). 325 Using reporter gene assays, Purushottam et al. (2005) demonstrated that cold 326 temperatures (5°C) prevent induction of the general stress genes uspA and rpoS upon 327 osmotic shock. Similarly, in starved E. coli O157:H7 cells, the GrpE general stress 328 protein is most abundant at 5°C, whereas UspA is most abundant at 37°C. Bacteria also 329 sense and communicate (e.g., quorum sensing, “scout”/suicide hypothesis) their exposure 330 to stresses (Leung, Dufour & Lévesque, 2015; Pinto, Santos & Chambe, 2015). For 331 example, upon alkali or acid exposure, extracellular induction components are produced 332 and can act as alarmones to warn unstressed cells to prepare for the upcoming danger 333 (Lazim & Rowbury, 2000; Rowbury & Goodson, 2005; Li et al., 2014; Leung, Dufour & 334 Lévesque, 2015,). Stress-inducible alarmones are small signaling molecules that diffuse 335 readily and can be activated by more than one stress (Leung, Dufour & Lévesque, 2015). 336 The level of (p)ppGpp is also involved in RpoS transcription (Jones, 2012). So far, 337 research on bacterial stress responses have focused on the period when physiological 338 changes are at their peak and geared towards survival (Storz & Hengge-Aronis, 2000). 339 DnaK is a chaperone protein implicated in the folding of nascent polypeptides, repair of 340 denatured proteins, and degradation of non-functional ones (Georgopoulos, & Welch, 341 1993); it represents 1% of the total proteins under optimal growth conditions. It is also 342 known as a heat shock protein which may increase up to 13% of the total proteins when 343 cells are grown at 30°C and then exposed to 42°C (Herendeen, VanBogelen, Nedhardt, 344 1979). Residual DnaK after heating was found to be necessary for cell recovery, and 345 additional DnaK was produced during the recovery process. Furthermore, resistance to 346 the same lethal heat treatment was better in cells that went to a recovery process than in 347 exponentially growing cells as if, through some epigenetic process, daughter cells 348 remembered the stress their mother cells were exposed to (Seyer et al., 2003). Real-time 349 PCR measurement of heat shock gene expression also indicated that dnaK and groEL 350 mRNA levels decreased significantly above 60°C to become similar to control cells at 351 37°C suggesting that above 60°C, cells’ ability to adapt to heat treatment declined and the 352 treatment begins to be effective (Guernec, Robichaud-Rincon & Saucier, 2013). Hence, 353 as stress severity approaches cell death, stress response drops, suggesting a shift towards 354 a “near-death physiology state” (Seyer et al., 2003; Guernec, Robichaud-Rincon & 355 Saucier, 2013). In practice, this means that for heat treatment to be effective, it must be 356 severe enough to avoid bacterial stress response and adaptation. 357 Processed meat cooking (e.g., ham, bologna, etc.) aims to control non-spore 358 formers. Therefore, the product is not sterile and must be kept refrigerated to secure a 359 decent shelf life that reaches 30 days under modified atmosphere packaging (e.g., 360 vacuum), depending on the product and its formulation. Historically, processed meat 361 products are cooked to a temperature of 71°C at their geometric center to be considered 362 effective and should provide a 6.5-log reduction of Salmonella in meat products that do 363 not contain poultry, and a 7-log for those that do (Martin, 1984, Sallami et al., 2006). 364 However, an extremely heat-resistant E. coli has been isolated from a beef processing 365 facility (Dlusskaya, McMullen, & Gänzel, 2011). Heat resistance is associated with a 366 14 kb genomic island containing 16 predicted open reading frames which share >99% 367 sequence identity with sequence in Cronobacter sakazakii and Klebsiella pneumonia 368 known to be linked to heat resistance (Mercer et al., 2015). Our microarray results reveal 369 that although cells of E. coli K12 treated at 58 or 60°C for a pasteurization value (PV) of 370 3 min could not resume growth after treatment, their gene expression was significantly 371 different from those treated at a core temperature of 71°C (Fig. 2). In fact, eight genes 372 were still expressed differentially between treatments (Guernec, Robichaud-Rincon & 373 Saucier, 2013). The biological significance of the presence of those transcripts remains to 374 be tested since residual metabolic activity does not necessarily mean viability. For 375 instance, when an animal is slaughtered, eviscerated and carcass dressing is completed, 376 muscle cells remain metabolically active until cellular reserves are exhausted, even 377 though there is no more vascular circulation. So, it is important to discriminate when 378 bacteria are still fighting adverse conditions and when residual metabolic activity is 379 sustained beyond cell survival ability. Membrane integrity has been suggested as a key 380 component to assess viability and cell wall strengthening by increased peptidoglycan 381 cross-linking has been observed in VBNC cells (Li et al., 2014). 382 Working with a food matrix is complex and a whole array of antimicrobial 383 systems is used in carcass dressing (e.g., organic acid showers (1.5% lactic or acetic 384 acid), carcass pasteurization, cold storage, etc.) and during meat processing (e.g., nitrite, 385 acidification/fermentation, drying, salt content, etc.). This multitude of processes can 386 actually lead to various cross protections (Lemay et al., 2000; Li et al., 2014). Our 387 previous work (Lemay et al., 2000), on different antimicrobial systems applied in 388 different sequences, like it is often seen in industrial food preparation (e.g., chilling after 389 cooking), indicates that cells survive better after exposure to a sub-lethal osmotic shock 390 (NaCl) followed by an acid stress (lactic or glutamic acid), compared to reverse order. 391 Lowest survival is obtained when treatments are applied simultaneously. Hence, the 392 sequence of events during food processing is important and will influence both the 393 overall efficacy of treatments and the level of microbiological control obtained. 394 Furthermore, using irradiation treatments (0.3 kGy) applied at different rates (8x10-2 and 395 3x10-3 KGy/min) on E. coli cells, we demonstrated that treatment applied at a slower rate 396 initiated a stronger stress response (Saucier et al., 2012). Even though a lot is known 397 about individual hurdles, little physiological information is available with respect to 398 various combinations, sequences and rates of application in real food/meat systems. 399 As the industry thrives to provide both good quality and safe foods, and to answer 400 consumers’ demands, it is important to acquire the necessary knowledge and tools to 401 improve our understanding of near-death physiology in order to sustain the vitality of our 402 agri-food sector. A new technology or antimicrobial system cannot be used to its full 403 potential if we do not understand how it works. Such knowledge is important for 404 improving food safety and product quality, and to reduce economic losses in the agri- 405 food industry due to microbial spoilage, loss, waste as well as recalls. 406 407 408 8. Conclusion Nature is resilient and all living organisms thrive to survive. Survival strategies 409 and physiological make up do exist, and continue to evolve, even amongst 410 microorganisms and these pose challenges in terms of risk assessments related to safety. 411 So, when we abuse our agricultural resources to a point of no return, it is a sign that we 412 have went too far. Ocean garbage patches, the recurrent presence of smog in major cities, 413 the recent burst of toxic mining waste in Brazil are all signs that we are running towards a 414 wall. It is not a matter of if, but when, and at what speed we are getting there. Economic 415 growth based on demography and productivity alone no longer holds. Agricultural 416 sustainability, wise natural resources management, reduction of waste will have to 417 become part of the equation. 418 419 420 Acknowledgements This review manuscript and associated presentation at the 62nd International 421 Congress on Meat Science and Technology in Bangkok, Thailand are dedicated to the 422 memory of a colleague and dear friend Dr. C.O. Gill (1943-2014) Research Scientist at 423 the Lacombe Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 424 425 References 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 Bianchi, M., Petracci, M., Venturi, L., Cremonini, M. A., & Cavani, C. (2008). Influence of preslaughter fasting on live weight loss, carcass yield and meat quality in rabbits. Proceedings of the 9th World Rabbit Congress (pp. 1313-1318), Verona, Italy, June 10-13. Blackman, I. C., Park, Y. W., & Harrison, M. A. (2005). Effects of oxidative compounds on thermotolerance in Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains EO139 and 380-94. Journal of Food Protection, 68, 2443-2446. Botsoglou, N. A., Christaki, E., Fletouris, D. J., Florou-Paneri, P., & Spais, A. B., (2002). The effect of dietary oregano essential oil on lipid oxidation in raw and cooked chicken during refrigerated storage. Meat Science, 62, 259-265. Doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00256-X. Botsoglou, N. A., Florou-Paneri, P., Christaki, E., Giannenas, I., & Spais, A. B. (2004). Performance of rabbits and oxidative stability of muscle tissue as affected by dietary supplementation with oregano essential oil. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 58, 209-218. Doi: 10.1080/00039420410001701404. Botsoglou, N. A., Govaris, A., Botsoglou, E. N., Grigoropoulou, S. H., & Papageorgiou, G. (2003). Antioxidant activity of dietary oregano essential oil and α-tocopheryl acetate supplementation in long-term frozen stored turkey meat. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51, 2930-2936. Doi: 10.1021/jf021034o. Bradshaw, R. H., Parrott, R. F., Goode, J. A., Lloyd, D. M., Rodway, R. G., & Broom, D. M. (1996). Behavioural and hormonal responses of pigs during transport: effect of mixing and duration of journey. Animal Science, 62, 547-554. Buzzini, P., & Arapitsas, P. (2008). Antimicrobial and antiviral activity of hydrolysable tannins. Review in Medicinal Chemistry, 8, 1179-1187. Catford, A., Lavoie, M.-C., Smith, B., Buenaventura, E., Couture, H., Fazil, A., & Farber, J. M. (2013). Findings of the health risk assessment of Escherichia coli O157 in mechanically tenderized beef products in Canada. International Food Risk Analysis Journal, 3, 1-12. Doi: 10.5772/56713. Daglia M. (2012). Polyphenols as antimicrobial agents. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 23, 174-181. Doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.08.007. Dodd, C. E., & Aldsworth, T. G. (2002). The importance of RpoS in the survival of bacteria through food processing. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 74, 189-194. Dlusskaya, E. A., McMullen, L. M., Gänzel, M. G. (2011). Characterisation of an extremely heat-resistant E. coli obtained from a beef processing facility. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 110, 840-849. Eijck, I. A. & Borgsteede, F. H. (2005). A survey of gastrointestinal pig parasites on freerange, organic and conventional pig farms in The Netherlands. Vetenary Research Communications, 29, 407-414. FAO. (2011). Global food losses and food waste. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/mb060e/mb060e.pdf. FAO. (2016). SAVE FOOD: Global initiative on food loss and waste reduction. http://www.fao.org/save-food/resources/keyfindings/infographics/meat/en/. 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 Faucitano, L. (2010). Effects of lairage and slaughter conditions on animal welfare and pork quality. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 90, 461-469. Faucitano, L., Ielo, M. C., Ster, C., Lo Fiego, D. P., Méthot, S., & Saucier, L. (2010a). Shelf life of pork from five different quality classes. Meat Science, 84, 466-469. Faucitano, L., Chevillon, P., & Ellis, M. (2010b). Effects of feed withdrawal prior to slaughter and nutrition on stomach weight, and carcass and meat quality in pigs. Livestock Science, 127, 110-114. Faucitano, L., Saucier, L., Correa, J. A., Méthot, S., Giguère, A., Foury, A., Mormède, P., & Bergeron, R. (2006). Effects of feed texture, meal frequency and pre-slaughter fasting on carcass and meat quality, and urinary cortisol in pigs. Meat Science, 74, 697-703. Faucitano, L., & Schaefer, A. L. (2008). The Welfare of Pigs - from Birth to Slaughter, Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers. Fortier, M.-P., Saucier, L., & Guay, F. (2012). Effects on microbial quality of fresh pork loin during storage from oregano oil and cranberry pulp diet supplementation in pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 92, 465-471. Doi:10.4141/CJAS2012078. Fournier, A. (2015). Projet de récupération de viande en épicerie pour Moisson Beauce. L’actualité alimentaire. http://www.actualitealimentaire.com/actualites/projetrecuperation-de-viande-en-epicerie-pour-moisson-beauce. Fread, G. (2014). Strategic planning analysis – Part III. Food in Canada. http://www.foodincanada.com/opinions/strategic-planning-analysis-part-iii/. Georgopoulos, C., & Welch, W. J. (1993). Role of the major heat shock proteins as molecular chaperones. Annual Review of Cell Biology, 9, 601-634. Gill, C. O. (2000). HACCP in primary processing : red meat. In M. Brown (Ed.), HACCP in the meat industry (pp. 81-122). Boca Raton: CRC Press. Gill, C. O., Devos, J., Youssef, M. K., & Yang, X. (2014). Effects of selected cooking procedures on the survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in inoculated steaks cooked on a hot plate or gas barbecue grill. Journal of Food Protection, 77, 919926. Doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-526. Greer, G. G., & Dilts, B. D. (1990). Inability of a bacteriophage pool to control beef spoilage. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 10, 331-342. Greer, G. G., & Dilts, B. D. (2002). Control of Brochothrix thermosphacta spoilage of porc adipose tissue using bacteriophage. Journal of Food Protection, 65, 861-863. Guernec, A., Robichaud-Rincon, P., & Saucier, L. (2013). Whole-genome transcriptional analysis of Escherichia coli during heat inactivation processes related to industrial cooking. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 79, 4940-495. Doi:10.1128/AEM.00958-13 Hagen, S., & Loessner, M. J. (2014). Phages of Listeria offer novel tools for diagnostic and biocontrol. Frontiers in microbiology, 5, Article 159. Doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00159. Health Canada (2014). Guidance on mandatory labelling for mechanically tenderized beef. Government of Canada. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fnan/alt_formats/pdf/legislation/guide-ld/mech-tenderized-beef-boeuf-attendris-mecaeng.pdf. 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 Herendeen, S. L., VanBogelen, R. A., & Neidhardt, F. C. (1979). Levels of major proteins of Escherichia coli during growth at different temperatures. Journal of Bacteriology, 139, 185-194. Houben, J. H., & Gerris, C. V. (2002). In vivo or in vitro application of vitamin E and the colour stability of low-oxygen packaged, sliced, pasteurised, differently cured pork shoulder model products. European Food Research and Technology, 215, 384-389. Huffman, R. D. (2002). Current and future technologies for the decontamination of carcasses and fresh meat. Meat Science, 62, 285-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S03091740(02)00120-1. Isaacson, R. E., Firkins, L. D., Weigel, R. M., Zuckermann, F. A., & DiPietro, J. A. (1999). Effect of transportation and feed withdrawal on shedding of Salmonella typhimurium among experimentally infected pigs. American Journal Veterinary Research, 60, 1155-1158. Interbev. (2006). Le point sur la couleur de la viande bovine. http://www.agrireseau.qc.ca/bovinsboucherie/documents/couleur_viande_bovine1.pdf Jones, T. (2012). Response of E. coli to environmental stress. In Wong HC ed. Stress response of foodborne microorganisms (pp. 293-330). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Lahucky, R., Nuernberg, K., Kovac, L., Bucko, O., & Nuernberg, G. (2010). Assessment of the antioxidant potential of selected plant extracts – In vitro and in vivo experiments on pork. Meat Science, 85, 779-784. Lazim, Z., & Rowbury, R. J. (2000). An extracellular sensor and an extracellular induction component are required for alkali induction of alkyl hydroperoxide tolerance in Escherichia coli. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 89, 651-656. Lebel, P., Fravalo, P., Longpré, J., Yergeau, É, Laplante, B., & Letellier, A. (2013). Digestive microbiota changes during application of an effective feed presentation based, mitigation option against Salmonella shedding in pigs. Proceedings of Safepork 2013 (pp. 147-150), Portland, Maine, USA. September 9-12. Lee, C., Reed, J. D., & Richards, M. P. (2006). Ability of various polyphenolic classes from cranberry to inhibit lipid oxidation in mechanically separated turkey and cooked ground pork. Journal of Muscle Foods, 17, 248-266. Doi: 10.1111/j.17454573.2006.00048.x. Lemay, M.-J., Rodrigue, N., Gariépy, C., & Saucier, L. (2000). Adaptation of Lactobacillus alimentarius to environmental stresses. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 55, 249-253. Leung, V., Dufour, D., & Lévesques, C. M. (2015). Death and survival in Streptococcus mutans: differing outcomes of a quorum-sensing signaling peptide. Frontiers Microbiology, 6, Article 1176. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01176. Leusink, G., Rempel, H., Skura, B., Berkyto, M., White, W., Yang, Y., Rhee, J. Y., Xuan, S. Y., Chiu, S., Silversides, F., Fitzpatrick, S., & Diarra, M. S. (2010). Growth performance, meat quality, and gut microflora of broiler chickens fed with cranberry extract. Poultry Science, 89, 1514-1523. Li, L., Mendis, N., Trigui, H., Oliver, J. D., & Faucher, S. P. (2014). The importance of the viable but non-culturable state in human bacterial pathogens. Frontiers Microbiology, 5, Article 258. Doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00258. 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 Lundén, J. M., Autio, T. J., Sjöberg, A.-M., & Korkeala, H. (2003). Persistent and nonpersistent Listeria monocytogenes contamination in meat and poultry processing plants. Journal of Food Protection, 66, 2062-2069. Lutz, W., Sanderson, W., & Scherbov, S. (2001). The end of world growth. Nature, 412,543-545. Doi:10.1038/35087589. Martin, J. L. (1984). Conduite des cuissons à l’aide des valeurs pasteurisatrices et cuisatrices. Viande et Produits Carnés, 5, 107–108. Mercer, R. G., Zheng, J., Garcia-Hernandez, R., Ruan, L., Gänzel, M. G., & McMullen, L. M. (2015). Genetic determinants of heat resistance in Escherichia coli. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, Article 932. Doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00932. Métris, A., George, S. M., Mackey, B.M., & Baranyi, J. (2008). Modeling the viability of single-cell lag times for L. innocua populations after sublethal and lethal heat treatments. Applied and Environmental Microbiolology, 74, 6949-6955. Doi:10.1128/AEM.01237-08. Mitsumoto, M., Arnold, R. N., Schaefer, D. M. & Cassen, R. G. (1993). Dietary versus postmortem supplementation of vitamin E on pigmet and lipid stability in ground beef. Journal of Animal Science, 71, 1812-1816. Moineau, S., Fortier, J., Ackermann, H.-W., & Pandian, S. (1992). Characterization of lactococcal bacteriophages from Quebec cheese plants. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 38, 875-882. Doi: 10.1139/m92-143. Murray, A. C. (2001). Reducing losses from farm gate to packer. A Canadian perspective. Proceedings of the 1st International Virtual Conference on Pork Quality (pp. 72-84), Concordia, Brazil. Olivier, J. D. (2005). Viable but nonculturable bacteria in food environments. In Fratamino, P. M., Bhuria, A. K., & Smith, J. L. (Eds.). Foodborne pathogens: microbiology and molecular biology (pp. 99-111). Norwich: Caister Academic Press. Olivier, J. D. (2010). Recent findings on the viable but nonculturable state in pathogenicbacteria. FEMS Microbiological Review, 34, 415–425. Doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00200.x. Oussalah, M., Caillet, S., Saucier, L., & Lacroix, M. (2007). Inhibitory effects of selected plant essential oils on the growth of four pathogenic bacteria: Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control, 18, 414-420. Pinto, D., Santos, M. A., & Chambe, L. (2015). Thirty years of viable but non-culturable state research: Unsolved molecular mechanisms. Critical Review in Microbiology, 41, 61-76. Purushottam, V. G., & Griffiths, M. W. (2005). Effects of environmental stresses on the activities of the uspA, grpE and rpoS promoters of Escherichia coli O157:H7. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 99, 91-98. Rabaste, C., Faucitano, L., Saucier, L., Foury, D., Mormède, P., Correa, J. A., Giguère, A., & Bergeron, R. 2007. The effects of handling and group size on welfare of pigs in lairage and its influence on stomach weight, carcass microbial contamination and meat quality variation. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 87, 3-12. Raghavan, S., & Richards, M. P. (2006). Partitioning and inhibition of lipid oxidation in mechanically separated turkey by components of cranberry press cake. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54, 6403-6408. Doi: 10.1021/jf061078n. 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 Ritter, M. J., Ellis, M., Bertelsen, C. R., Bowman, R., Brinkmann, J., DeDecker, J. M., Mendoza, O., Murphy, C. M., Peterson, B. A., Rojo, A., Schlipf, J. M., & Wolter, B. F. (2006). Impact of animal management and transportation factors on transport losses in market weight pigs at the packing plant. Journal of Animal Science, 84 (Suppl. 1), 302. Rowan, N. J. (2004). Viable but non-culturable forms of food and waterborne bacteria: Quo Vadis? Trends Food Science and Technology, 15, 462-467. Rowbury, R. J., & Goodson, M. (2005). Extracellular sensors and extracellular alarmones, which permit cross-talk between organisms, determine the levels of alkali tolerance and trigger alkali induced acid sensitivity in Escherichia coli. Science Progress, 88, 133-156. Rozoy, É., Bazinet, L., Araya-Farias, M., Guernec, A., & Saucier, L. (2013). Inhibitory effects of commercial and enriched green tea extracts on the growth of meat spoilage bacteria. Journal of Food Research, 2, 1-7. Doi: 10.5539/jfr.v2n1p1. Sallami, L., Marcotte, M., Naim, F., Ouattara, B., Leblanc, C., & Saucier, L. (2006). Heat inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi in a typical bologna matrix during an industrial cooking-cooling cycle. Journal of Food Protection, 69, 3025-3030. Sans, P., & Combris, P. (2015). World meat consumption patterns: An overview of the last fifty years (1961-2011). Meat Science, 109, 106-111. Saucier, L., Moineau, S., & Fairbrother, J. M. (2001). Host range of bacteriophages on pathogenic Escherichia coli of human and animal origin: Prologue to phage therapy. Annual Symposium of the Canadian Meat Science Association, February 7th, Vancouver, Canada. Saucier, L. (1999). Meat safety: Challenges for the future. Outlook on Agriculture, 28, 77-82. Saucier, L., Bernier, D., Bergeron, R., Méthot, S., Giguère, A., & Faucitano, L. (2007). Effect of feed texture, meal frequency and pre-slaughter fasting on behaviour, stomach weight and microbial carcass contamination in pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 87, 479-486. Saucier, L., Dubé, C., Guernec, A., & Naim, F. (2012). Induction of DnaK upon girradiation in Escherichia coli. Food Nutrion Sciences, 3, 1349-1353. Doi: 10.4236/fns.2012.310178. Schaefer, D. M., Liu, Q., Faustman, C., & Yin, M.-C. (1995). Supranutritional administration of vitamins E and C improves oxidative stability of beef. The Journal of Nutrition, 125, 1792S-1798S. Seyer, K., Lessard, M., Piette, G., Lacroix, M., & Saucier, L. (2003). Escherichia coli heat shock protein DnaK: Production and its consequences in terms of monitoring cooking. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 69, 3231-3237. Doi:10.1128/AEM.69.6.3231-3237.2003 Sieradzki, L., & Tomasz, A. (2006). Inhibition of the autolytic system by vancomycin causes mimicry of Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus-Type Resistance, cell concentration dependence of the MIC, and antibiotic tolerance in Vancomycin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 50, 527-533. 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 Soultos, N., Tzikas, Z., Christaki, E., Papageorgiou, K., & Steris, V. (2009). The effect of dietary oregano essential oil on microbial growth of rabbit carcasses during refrigerated storage. Meat Science, 81, 474-478. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.10.001. Storz, G., & Hengge-Aronis, R. (2000). Bacterial stress response. Washington: ASM Press. Thomas, M. K., Murray, R., Flockhart, L., Pintar, K., Pollari, F., Nesbitt, A., & Marshall, B. (2013). Estimates of the burden of foodborne illness in Canada for 30 specified pathogens and unspecified agents, Circa 2006. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 10, 639-648. Doi: 10.1089/fpd.2012.1389. Weatherill, S. (2009). Report of the independent investigator into the 2008 listeriosis outbreak. Government of Canada. http://www.cmccvc.com/sites/default/files/files/ListeriaIndependentInvestigatorReport_July212009.pdf. Weschenfelder, A. V., Maldague, X., Schaefer, A., Rocha, L. M., Saucier, L., & Faucitano, L. (2013a). Use of infrared ocular thermography to assess physiological conditions of pigs prior to slaughter and predict pork quality variation. Meat Science, 95, 616-620. Weschenfelder, A. W., Torrey, S., Devillers, N., Crowe, T., Bassols, A., Saco, Y., Piñeiro, M., Saucier, L., & Faucitano, L. (2012). Effects of trailer design on animal welfare parameters and carcass and meat quality of three Pietrain crosses being transported over a long distance. Journal of Animal Science, 90, 3220-3231. Weschenfelder, A. V., Torrey, S., Devillers, N., Crowe, T., Bassols, A., Saco, Y., Piñeiro, M., Saucier, L., & Faucitano, L. (2013b). Effects of trailer design on animal welfare parameters and carcass and meat quality of three Pietrain crosses being transported over a short distance. Livestock Science, 157, 234-244. WHO (2015). WHO estimates of the Global burden of foodborne diseases. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/199350/1/9789241565165_eng.pdf?ua=1 Yamaguchi, Y., & Inouye, M. (2011). Regulation of growth and death in Escherichia coli by toxin–antitoxin systems. Nature Review, 9, 779-790. Zhao, T., Podtburg, T. C., Zhao, P., Schmidt, B. E., Baker, D. A., Cords, B., & Doyle, M. P. (2006). Control of Listeria spp. by competitive-exclusion bacteria in floor drains of a poultry processing plant. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72, 3314-3320. 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 Figure Captions Fig. 1. Competitive exclusion study between a commercial biological product containing a live non-pathogenic consortium of bacteria designed for odour treatment of grease trap and drain in agri-food facilities against Listeria innocua at Log103 CFU/ml of each. Cell enumeration (Log10 CFU/ml) was performed over time after incubation in Brain Heart Infusion at 10°C with or without agitation (WA and NA, respectively). Fig.1 Hierarchical clustering of differential gene expression upon various heat treatments. Only E. coli cells heated at 58°C PV2 were able to resume growth. Pasteurisation value (PV) is defined as the time needed at a given temperature to control the reference organism, here Enterococcus faecalis (D value of 2.95 min at 70°C and z value of 10°C). 700 701 Table 1 Consumer trends and demands as defined by Fread (2014). Designations Foodies 702 Description curious, variety of foods, pleasure Healthies healthy foods, more natural, less preservative Greenies socially responsible (ethic, environment) Speedies convenient food, minimal preparation Cheapies value-conscious, limited spending Newbies immigrant with “culinary culture”