Download TigranArzumanyan_presentation.pps

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND
INNOVATION POLICY
REFORMATION TRENDS IN
TRANSITION COUNTRIES ON
THE MODEL OF ARMENIA
Tigran ARZUMANYAN
2nd PhD School on Innovation and Economic
Development: Globelics Academy 2005,
Lisbon, Portugal
23 May – 4 June, 2005
A LITTLE HISTORY ...
• During the Soviet period Armenia
developed a ramified and actively
operating system of research and
technological institutions.
• These capabilities were oriented to a
significant degree toward supporting the
Soviet military-industrial complex and
most of research institutions were well
financed directly from Moscow.
After the collapse of the USSR...
• The difficulties of a transition period,
worsening of the economic situation,
destruction of previous economic, scientific
and other connections, sharp decrease of a
demand for a traditional Armenian
production (including intellectual) have
unavoidably led to the sufficient reduction in
the activities of many scientific and technical
subdivisions and relevant S&T capacious
productions/industries.
PROBLEMS FACED
 reduced budget allocations to R&D, mainly
used for salaries and covering growing
operating costs;
 sharp reduction of total number of research
staff and slowdown of inflow of young
specialists to science and technology resulting
in deficiency of practicing scientists in the 2540 age bracket;
 emigration of qualified Armenian specialists
to the developed foreign countries or other
sectors of the economy.
0,6
0,5
DYNAMICS OF GERD/GDP %
(1990-2002)
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,3
0,2
0,3
0,2
0,2
0,1
0,2
0,1
0,1
0
1990
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Source: National Statistical Service of Armenia, 2003. Statistical Yearbook of Armenia,
www.armstat.am
FINANCIAL ALLOCATIONS TO R&D
Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D
• (GERD) was 0,2 % of GDP in 2002
• In 2002 GDP was around 50% of GDP
1990 in nominal values;
• Governmental funds according to type
of activity:
– about 70% to basic research
– about 27% to applied research
– about 3% to experimental developments
NUMBER OF R&D INSTITUTIONS
(1991-2003)
140
120
124 122
101
100
80
94
96
82
73
88
91
96
99
60
40
46
44
20
0
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Source: National Statistical Service of Armenia, 2004. Statistical Yearbook of Armenia,
www.armstat.am
NUMBER OF RESEARCH PERSONNEL
(1997-2003)
25000
20000
20000
15000
10000
7716 8133
6528 7309 6965 6737 6277
5000
0
1990 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Source: National Statistical Service of Armenia, 2004. Statistical Yearbook of Armenia,
www.armstat.am
S&T INFRASTRUCTURE
Parliamentary
Commission for
Science
University
R&D
Subordinated
R&D Institutes
Source: Compiled by the author
Department of
Science Ministry
of Education and
Science
Science
Departments
of Relevant
Branch
Ministries
Presidium of
National
Academy of
Sciences
R&D
Institutes
MAIN R&D INSTITUTIONS OF ARMENIA
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
- Total number of Institutes - 40
Including:
• Division of Physical, Mathematical &
Technical Sciences - 13 Institutes, in the fields
of ICT, Physics, Nuclear Physics, Astrophysics,
Radiophysics &Electronics, Geophysics,
Engineering Seismology, Mechanics,
Mathematics, Geological Sciences, etc.
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (2)
• Division of Natural Sciences - 16 Institutes,
in the fields of:
Biotechnology, Medical Genetics, Environmental
Studies, Neurochemistry, Chemical Physics; Fine
Organic, General and Inorganic Chemistry,
Microbiology, Physiology, Ichthyology, Zoology,
Physiology, Hydroponics, Botany, etc.
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (3)
• Division of Humanities and Social Sciences 11 Institutes, in the fields of:
Archaeology, Ethnography, Oriental Studies,
Philosophy, Sociology, Law, Economics,
History, Armenian Studies, Art History,
Linguistics, etc.
•
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND
SCIENCE
20 national universities supervised by
the Ministry of Education & Science
including:
Yerevan State University, Medical University,
Engineering University, Agricultural Academy, etc.
• About 70 private universities established during
last years
OTHER BRANCH R&D INSTITUTIONS
• Ministry of Trade & Economic Development
About 40 institutes (Yerevan Physics Institute,
Institute of Biotechnology, Institute of Opticphysical Measurement, Institute of Applied
Chemistry, etc.)
• Ministry of Health Care
10 institutes involved in various medical research
• Ministry of Agriculture
6 institutes
RESPONSIBILITIES OF EXECUTIVE
BODIES
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION & SCIENCE
• Responsible for general S&T policy
making in the country
• Management of Universities’ R&D
• Institutional & project based
distribution of budget funding to all
R&D institutions based on the decision
of Expert Commissions (Peer review)
MEMBERS OF EXPERT COMMISSIONS
• Experts from each R&D Institution &
University
• Scientific Councils of R&D Institutes and
Universities elect experts
Problems
• Impartiality of decision-making is
questionable (conflict of interests)
• Need for involvement of independent
experts
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
The Law assigns the Academy to:
• Manage R&D Institutes of NAS RA
• Coordinate basic research carried out
throughout Armenia
• Act as official scientific consultant to the
highest governing bodies of the country,
proposals of which in the field of S&T are
to be necessarily taken into discussion.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN S&T&I
•
During last years Armenian Government
initiated steps to improve the situation and
declared S&T and Innovation Policy as priority
area for development.
•
Law on Scientific & Technological Activity
adopted in 2000 to regulate interrelations between
research & technological organizations, state
bodies and consumers of research outcomes. It
states the need for promoting innovation and
commercialization of research outcomes as main
factor of economic growth.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN S&T (2)
• In 2002 the Government also specified main
scientific directions as priority areas for
development as follows:
– Armenian Studies;
– Information Technologies
– Basic research promoting applied research of vital
importance
– Advanced Technologies (Biotechnology &
Nanotechnology)
– New Energy Sources and New Materials
– Risk Factors & Human Health
PROBLEMS
• Absence of S&T&I coordinating body at the highest
governmental level;
• Status of the academic institutes as non-commercial
organizations as restricting factor to commercialization of
R&D results;
• The measures undertaken are mostly of declarative
character and don’t provide real mechanisms for achieving
the stated objectives;
• Declared priority areas are very general and hardly to be
developed all together by scarce funds allocated for R&D.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN S&T (4)
Along with stated problems certain positive trends
can be observed:
• According to officials, growth in IT sales has been
nearly 20% per year during last years, accounting
for 2% of the GDP (about $ 50 million USD in
export revenues in 2003).
• Around 200 small private software companies
have emerged in recent years, working primarily
through outsourcing contracts with large Western
software firms.
SUCCESS STORIES
• Enterprise Incubator Foundation founded in 2002
to assist:
• Building successful business incubation mechanisms
for IT start-ups.
• Stimulate growth in IT sector by providing interrelated
services;
• Drive Armenian technology products to international
market;
• Attract foreign investments.
SUCCESS STORIES (2)
• Open Source Armenia, initiated in 2003
• The project in Armenia in the IT area aimed at
developing a community of IT professionals and
exposing their potential to the world.
• Provide organizational, legal, technical,
management, marketing and financial support for
the OSA open-source software projects.
• Encourage development of hi-tech enterprises in
the country.
SUCCESS STORIES (3)
•
Viasphere Technopark
• State-of-the-art technology park located in
Yerevan providing infrastructure to local startups
and ICT companies worldwide looking to extend
their core development offshore;
• Currently houses several US-based subsidiaries
developing advanced technologies in variety of
ICT fields.
CONCLUSIONS
• To ensure further development of S&T and
Innovation processes in Armenia urgent
reformation of the whole system is needed.
• Establishment of coordinating body (Council on
S&T&I ) to develop system reformation
recommendations and carry out enforcement;
• Creation of special state programmes directed to
promoting academy-university-industry
cooperation;
CONCLUSIONS (2)
• With presently available resources it seems to be
very difficult for Armenia to sustain its robust and
huge R&D infrastructure, particularly, in the field
of basic research with sometimes overlapping
research activities. This necessitates some
realignment of the overall governmental research
structure with the concentration of available
resources for establishment of a few centers of
excellence in the declared priority areas.
Armenia is a small country but it has a
striking landscape and it contains
some awesome vistas
M
A
T
E
N
A
D
A
R
A
N
NORAVANQ MONASTRY -XII-XIV AD
Yerevan by night
THANK YOU!
Tigran Arzumanyan
Foreign Relations Department,
National Academy of Sciences of Armenia
Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law
E-mail:[email protected]