* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Sql_Server_Architecture_for_World_Domination
Oracle Database wikipedia , lookup
Extensible Storage Engine wikipedia , lookup
Concurrency control wikipedia , lookup
Microsoft Jet Database Engine wikipedia , lookup
Tandem Computers wikipedia , lookup
Functional Database Model wikipedia , lookup
Open Database Connectivity wikipedia , lookup
Relational model wikipedia , lookup
Database model wikipedia , lookup
Sql Server Architecture for World Domination Tristan Wilson Topics • • • • • Sql Server editions Scaling Sql Server Cloud + Virtual +Physical Hardware Migration strategies HADR Options Definitions • High availability – Increased uptime • Disaster recovery – Protection from negative events • Scale-up = Bigger/faster servers • Scale-out = More servers When do I scale up? • CPU is above threshold – Based on percent usage, or increased threads • Sql Server memory usage – page life expectancy, lazy writes, free list stalls • Increased I/O requirements • Look at your wait stats! Scaling out Sql Server • Read-only – AlwaysOn, Database mirroring, log shipping, replication, data loading tools • Read/write – Peer-to-peer replication, linked servers, distributed queries, sharding, custom solutions – Parallel data warehouse Sql Server editions • Express Edition – Maximum 10gb database size • Web Edition – Licensed through a hosting provider • Standard Edition – 16-core 64gb ram (128gb for 2014+) – 2016 is now licensed for 2-node AlwaysOn Sql Server editions • Business Intelligence Edition – Includes features specifically for BI – Same CPU/Ram limitations as Standard • Enterprise Edition – Coolest features, unlimited CPU/Ram Data the database • • • • 25-250gb worth of data Low performance Moderate downtime Just a friendly database The Cloud • Cloud databases • Virtual machines in the cloud • Vendors: – Azure, AWS – Managed hosting: , Rackspace, etc. Cloud Database Pro: • Low cost • Low management • Flexible, scalable • Quick deployment • Easy upgrades Con: • Limited features • Limited control • Platform dependencies • Security • Difficult migrations Virtual Machines Pro: • Cost effective • Highly availability • Flexible + Scalable Con: • Limited resources • Performance overhead • Management overhead Virtual Clusters • It does work! • Reduced downtime for reboot/patching • Check with your VM administrator How do I scale-up Data? • Increase cloud or virtual resources Data the database • • • • 250gb-1TB worth of data Increase performance Lower downtime Wasn’t this database supposed to be temporary? Physical Hardware • When do I go with physical hardware? – Increased CPU/Memory/IO consumption – Maximize performance – Specialized hardware requirements Selecting Hardware • Select your sockets + processors • Maximize ram • Don’t neglect local storage (get SSD’s!) Selecting Processors • Maximize speed over core count • Intel E5-2637 v3 – 4 cores at 3.5ghz • Intel E5-2640 v3 – 8 cores at 2.4ghz High Availability • Fail-over cluster • Database mirroring • AlwaysOn High Availability - Clustering Pro’s • Hardware/OS redundancy • Low downtime patching • Sliding upgrades Con’s • Idle second node • No redundant storage • Typically not a DR solution High Availability – DB Mirroring Pro’s • Fully redundant solution • No shared storage • 2-node in standard edition Con’s • Deprecated feature • Mirroring overhead • Additional witness server • Limited automatic fail-over High Availability - AlwaysOn Pro’s • Fully redundant solution • HA+DR • Reporting+Maintenance • No shared storage • Easy migration Con’s • Enterprise-only • Mirroring overhead • Double storage costs How do I scale-up Data? • Export/import of data from cloud • Backup/restore Data the database • • • • 1-3TB+ worth of data High performance No downtime Getting’ tired of his crap Disaster Recovery • Log Shipping • AlwaysOn DR – Log Shipping Pro’s • Web edition or higher • Only network connectivity • Low impact on primary Con’s • Some data loss • No automatic fail-over DR – AlwaysOn Pro’s Con’s • Low or no data loss • Must be in Windows cluster • Can be automatic fail-over • Enterprise only How do I scale-up Data? • Sliding upgrade with Clustering or AlwaysOn • Log shipping or database mirroring to new server Hybrid Architecture • On-premise hardware, DR in cloud • Primary physical server, virtual DR • Reporting and maintenance with AlwaysOn Review • Choose the right edition • Start small and plan to scale • Include HADR solutions [email protected] @SqlTristan