* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Fourth Quiz with answers
Survey
Document related concepts
Edmund Phelps wikipedia , lookup
Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory wikipedia , lookup
Pensions crisis wikipedia , lookup
Modern Monetary Theory wikipedia , lookup
Nominal rigidity wikipedia , lookup
Fear of floating wikipedia , lookup
Full employment wikipedia , lookup
Helicopter money wikipedia , lookup
Non-monetary economy wikipedia , lookup
Money supply wikipedia , lookup
Business cycle wikipedia , lookup
Fiscal multiplier wikipedia , lookup
Phillips curve wikipedia , lookup
Early 1980s recession wikipedia , lookup
Inflation targeting wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative easing wikipedia , lookup
Stagflation wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
AEM 1300 Fourth Quiz July 22, 2016 NAME: ___________________________________________________ CORNELL NET ID (Cornell Email Adress) __________________________ Signature __________________________________________________ Point values for each question are indicated. Total points – 20 Part I (Each Question is worth 1 point) 1. If the federal government is reducing net taxes to stimulate the economy at the same time the Fed is selling bonds in the open market, the expansionary fiscal policy will be A) less effective, because the Fed's actions will result in higher interest rates and an increase in the crowding-out effect. B) more effective, because the Fed's actions will result in lower interest rates and a reduction in the crowding-out effect. C) more effective, because the Fed's actions will result in lower interest rates and an increase in the crowding-out effect. D) less effective, because the Fed's actions will result in lower interest rates and an increase in the crowding-out effect. E) less effective, because the Fed’s actions will result in higher interest rates and an increase in the “crowding-in” effect. 2. An increase in the price level of the economy after an increase in oil price is an example of _____. An increased in the price level of the economy after a tax cut is an example of _____. A) Demand-pull inflation; Demand-pull inflation B) Cost-push inflation; Cost-push inflation C) Cost-push inflation; Demand-pull inflation D) Demand-pull inflation; Cost-push inflation LRAS Price Level SRAS A B C AD1 AD2 Aggregate output 3. Refer to the figure above. Originally, the economy was at point C. Suppose now the aggregate demand shits from AD2 to AD1, and the economy moves to B. If the government does not do anything and there is no technology change, which of the following is likely to happen next? A) B) C) D) AD shifts back and the economy will go back to point C. LRAS will shift to the right. The economy will move to A as wages adjust to changes in price level. SRAS will shift to the right so that it will achieve the original price level. 4. When the AS curve has only a slight upward slope, in the short-run, a rightward shift of AD curve will result in: A) a small increase in aggregate output and small inflation. B) a large increase in aggregate output and large inflation. C) a small increase in aggregate output and relatively large inflation. D) a large increase in aggregate output and relatively small inflation. 5. If the long-run aggregate supply curve is vertical, then the multiplier effect of a change in net taxes on aggregate output, in the long run, A) is zero. B) is one. C) is infinitely large. D) depends on the price level. 6. In terms of the Aggregate Supply curve, the “long-run” refers to A) a period of time in which an increase in the cost of production causes a change in the natural rate of unemployment. B) a period of time in which wages can be adjusted to changes in other prices. C) a period of time in which new technology allows the production possibility frontier to expand. D) a period of time in which an expansionary fiscal policy shifts the aggregate demand curve. 7. Which of the following will break down the negative relationship between the unemployment rate and the inflation rate as predicted by the conventional short run Phillips Curve? a) Demand-pull inflation b) Cost-push inflation c) The negative relationship between the unemployment rate and the inflation rate never breaks down d) None of the above e) Not enough information to say 8. When economy is in recession, which of the following policies could the Fed’s economists recommend? I. II. III. IV. FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) should sell securities The Fed should decrease the supply of the US Dollar The discount rate should be decreased The treasury should increase taxes a)I, II and IV b)I, II and III c)I and III d)III only. 9. Which of the following factors can lead to a decrease in the equilibrium interest rate level? I. II. III. IV. V. VI. a) b) c) d) The Fed decreases the required reserve ratio. The Fed increases the required reserve ratio. The Fed sells securities in the open market. The Fed purchases of securities in the open market. People’s income and wealth decreases. Price level increases. I , III, and V. II, IV and VI. I, IV and V. II, IV and V. 10. When an economy is in a liquidity trap a) interest rates are zero and fiscal policy is very effective b) interest rates are zero and monetary policy is very effective c) real interest rates are fixed d) all of the above e) none of the above PART II 1. Suppose the investment schedule for this economy is very steep (i.e. nearly vertical) Which policy – monetary or fiscal – would you expect to be more effective and why? (For the full credit, you need to draw 3 panel diagrams to illustrate your answer.) (3 points) Monetary policy becomes ineffective if the investment function is step (vertical), because a change in the interest rate cannot increase or decrease investment. Hence there is no change of output. As depicted in the following graph, any monetary policy won’t affect investment, and investment remains at Y0 for any level of interest rate. Given investment remains at same level, equilibrium of output is the same. r MS0 MS1 M0 M1 r r0 r1 M I AE I 0 AE=C+I0+G Y Y0 The fiscal policy is more effective for improving the economy because fiscal policy doesn’t exert its effect through investment. Therefore, increasing or decreasing government expenditure would shift AE upward or downward, resulting in change of Y. As shown in the following graph, the increase of government spending increases equilibrium output. 2. Monetary Policy and Fiscal Policy (4 points) “Japan Eases Monetary Policy in Surprise Move” By Wall Street Journal, September 19, 2012 TOKYO—The Bank of Japan announced an aggressive expansion of its monetary-easing program, acting with surprising speed after its analysis suggested that any economic recovery is at least six months away amid a global slowdown. The BOJ's move Wednesday follows similar actions by other major central banks. The Federal Reserve last week announced another round of quantitative easing, and earlier this month the European Central Bank established an open-ended program sovereign debt buying program in an attempt to end the euro crisis. "The BOJ deemed it necessary to act so that Japan's economy will not be derailed from a track toward sustainable growth under price stability," Gov. Masaaki Shirakawa said at a news conference after a two-day meeting of the central bank's policy board. He said that a recovery was unlikely before the end of the fiscal year next March. The Bank of Japan has joined two other central banks in easing monetary policy. Are central banks hinting at more long-term changes? Vincent Cignarella discusses on Markets Hub. The central banks' actions have raised market concerns that they are engaging in "competitive easings"—each trying to pump more money into its own economy, despite the potential negative impact elsewhere. The persistent high value of the yen, for example—a bane of Japanese policy makers—has been attributed in large part to sharply lower U.S. rates caused by the Fed's quantitative easing. The BOJ policy board Wednesday increased the size of its asset-purchase program to ¥80 trillion ($1.01 trillion) from ¥70 trillion, and extended its deadline by six months to the end of 2013. With interest rates near zero, the central bank's main tool for pumping money into the economy—and stimulating demand—is buying government bonds and other securities. a) b) Suppose that in the monetary market, the equilibrium interest rate is positive. What is expected to happen to Japan’s economy after its government implements an expansionary monetary policy? Explain in words and using 3 panel diagrams of the “money market”, “investment market” and “aggregate expenditure and real output”. Suppose now in the monetary market, the equilibrium interest rate is zero. What is expected to happen to Japan’s economy after its government implements an expansionary c) monetary policy? Explain in words and using 3 panel diagrams of “money market”, “investment market” and “aggregate expenditure and real output”. Suppose now in the monetary market, the equilibrium interest rate is zero. If you were a policy maker in Japan and your goal is to increase real output, would you use monetary policy or fiscal policy? Choose one policy that you think is more effective to increase real output under these conditions and explain how it is expected to work through 3 panel diagram as well as aggregate demand and aggregate supply curve. Answer key. 1. 2. 3.(Expansionary)Fiscal policy. An increase in government expenditure or a tax cut will shift up the planned aggregate expenditure curve and as a result increases real out put. There will be a clouding-out effect (money demand goes up -> interest rate goes up -> investment goes down), but overall effect is positive. Expansionary money policy would not work here. Since the interest rate is already zero, the Japan’s government cannot increase investment by lowering the interest rate. 1. Aggregate demand and aggregate supply (3 points) “Kocherlakota: Plan Suggests Easy Fed Policy For Four Or More Years” By Wall Street Journal, October 10, 2012 A key U.S. central bank official refined a plan that could keep monetary policy easy for years to come, in a speech that acknowledged "mixed reactions" to what he has been proposing. Speaking in Great Falls, Mont., on Wednesday, Minneapolis Fed President Narayana Kocherlakota again argued in favor of a policy that would keep central bank policy very easy until the unemployment rate hit 5.5%, as long as inflation stayed under 2.25%. Under such a plan, rate hikes "may not take place for four or more years," he said in the text of a speech prepared for delivery before a local growth. ……………………………..... Mr. Kocherlakota noted reactions to his plan was all over the map, saying many observers had misunderstood the case he was trying to make. He argued there's some confusion regarding the true dynamics surrounding the central bank's official mandate to promote job growth while keeping prices stable. Mr. Kocherlakota said in his speech as long as central bankers see "no tension" between the two poles of their mandate, they should keep monetary policy aggressively easy. ……………………………….. Meeting minutes released last week covering the September FOMC gathering showed central bankers devoting considerable attention to the possibility of employing a set of economic variables to greater describe how monetary policy will be conducted. One of the most public advocates for such a system has been Chicago Fed President Charles Evans, who has argued monetary policy should stay very easy until unemployment hits 7% or inflation moves well above the Fed's current target rate of 2% to 3%. Mr. Evans has argued it's pretty unlikely inflation would go that high with unemployment over 7%. Mr. Kocherlakota offered a similar defense: "Violations of price stability are unlikely to occur until the unemployment rate is considerably lower than its current level of 7.8%." He added, "even though the unemployment rate was at times below 5%, the medium-term inflation outlook based on material prepared for FOMC meetings has not risen above 2 1/4% percent in the past 15 years." ……. Mr. Kocherlakota said the considerable amount of slack in the economy generated by high unemployment rates means there's little chance inflation will flare any time soon. "There is no such tension at this time" between the jobs and inflation mandates, and this lack of tension between its two mandates is likely to continue for some time, he said. a) b) Now the economy has a high unemployment rate. Please use an AD and AS diagram to illustrate why Mr. Kocherlakota and Mr. Evans do not worry that easy monetary policy will result in high inflation. Please explain briefly why the short run aggregate supply curve has a positive slope, and why the short run aggregate supply curve will eventually turn into a vertical line as output increases. a. Because economy has a high unemployment, we are still now having high capacity to produce. Hence we are at relatively flat segment of AS curve. As shown in the following graph, given we are at the flat segment of AS, the easy monetary policy, which shifts AD curve to right from AD0 to AD1, won’t greatly increase our price level. Therefore, we should now worry about high inflation given the us has high unemployment. Price AS P1 P0 AD0 L 1 L 0 AD1 Y b. the short run aggregate supply curve is positive slope because there is lag between the change of the price of output and the change of the price of input. The most obvious example is sticky wage theory. If the output price increases relatively to cost of input, the optimal strategy for the firm is to produce more output. However, our resource in the word is limited so that supply curve can not go to unlimited. Starting from certain point, we can not increase output no matter how high the price is.