Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Program Notes – Tesla Quartet Sunday Concert, Feb 17, 2013 Copyright © 2012 by Jason S. Heilman, Ph.D. Quartet in D Major, K. 575, “Prussian” composed in 1789 – duration: 23 minutes Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756–1791) Even though he only spent ten years of his short life there, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart is as closely associated with the city of Vienna as he is with his own birthplace. Indeed, after dramatically breaking his commitments in provincial Salzburg at age twenty-five, Mozart initially thought he had found the greener pastures sought in the cosmopolitan imperial capital. His performances initially drew rave reviews, and he quickly found a loyal and devoted circle of friends and colleagues, but over the course of the 1780s, Mozart’s fortunes began to deteriorate. His early Viennese triumphs gave way to failures— particularly his operas Le nozze di Figaro and La Clemenza di Tito. Austria’s protracted war with Turkey diverted great amounts of imperial funding and led to hard economic times at home, making it even more difficult for an independent composer like Mozart to find steady income. Indeed, if we could ask Mozart what he thought of Vienna in the late 1780s, we would likely receive a less than ringing endorsement. In a way, we can tell what Mozart thought about his adopted hometown from his later compositions, which were increasingly written for foreign audiences. A flop at home, Figaro was a huge success in Prague, which led to Mozart premiering both Don Giovanni and La Clemenza di Tito there, along with one of his late symphonies. In 1789, Mozart traveled to Berlin, where he received a commission to write a set of six string quartets for King Friedrich Wilhelm II of Prussia, the heir to Frederick the Great. Unfortunately, Mozart was able to finish only three of these quartets before illness—first his family’s, then his own—became too great a distraction, and the unfulfilled commission was never paid. These three works would ultimately be Mozart’s final contributions to the string quartet genre. The three so-called “Prussian” quartets are famous for the way in which Mozart moderately expanded the role of the cello, Friedrich Wilhelm’s own instrument. The first of these quartets—Mozart’s twenty-first string quartet overall—is set in the bright key of D major, and gracefully avoids extremes of tempo or technique in a manner well suited to amateur musicians. Yet the quartet is hardly a trifle; by reconsidering the cello, Mozart was able to bring balance to the four voices in a way that was revolutionary at the time. The piece begins with a cheery allegretto movement that illustrates the newly democratic nature of Mozart’s quartet writing, as the opening theme is passed freely from the violin to the viola and back. The andante second movement is a gentle nocturne typical of Mozart’s slow movements, propelled by the first violin and the cello; this is followed by a jaunty minuet and trio. The main theme of the allegretto finale is introduced by the cello in its upper range. Though the violin remains prominent, all four instruments share the workload fairly equally in this movement, making this piece for amateurs an important step towards the virtuosic quartets of Ludwig van Beethoven and his successors. Love Letters composed in 2001 – duration: 20 minutes Carter Pann (b. 1972) For nearly two decades, Carter Pann’s music has become known for its blend of popular idioms, subtle humor, and haunting melodic writing. A native of the Chicago area, Pann studied composition and piano at the Eastman School of Music and the University of Michigan; his composition teachers included Samuel Adler, William Bolcom, Joseph Schwantner, and Bright Sheng. Pann’s music has been performed by major orchestras, wind ensembles, chamber groups, and soloists throughout the world. His clarinet concerto Rags to Richard, commissioned for Richard Stoltzman, was recorded by the Seattle Symphony under Gerard Schwarz, while his widelyperformed work SLALOM was featured by the London Symphony under Daniel Harding in 2001 and was later showcased on NPR’s Performance Today. Pann’s compositions have garnered numerous awards, including a prize in the Polish Kazimierz Serocki Competition for his First Piano Concerto (premiered by the Polish Radio Symphony in 1998), a Charles Ives Scholarship from the Academy of Arts and Letters, and five ASCAP composer awards. The recording of his Piano Concerto was also nominated for a 2001 Grammy award for Best Classical Composition. For more on Pann’s music, visit his website at www.carterpann.com. Pann’s Love Letters (String Quartet No. 1) was commissioned by the Ying Quartet as part of their “LifeMusic” project through a grant from the American Music Institute. The piece takes its inspiration from Leoš Janáček’s Second String Quartet, subtitled “Intimate Letters”, which itself was inspired by the emotions the composer experienced while carrying out a love affair in prose. Pann’s quartet, which combines a neo-romantic aesthetic with modern popular music influences, follows the emotional trajectory of a love affair in four titled movements. It opens with the nervous yet lyrical Prayer, followed by the lush Debussyesque Serenade, which waxes and wanes in intensity. The brief Limbo acts as a kind of pause before the finale, the driving Passions movement, which builds to a cleverly ambiguous coda. Six Bagatelles, Op. 9 composed in 1913 – duration: 5 minutes Anton Webern (1883–1945) Considered the intellectual successors to Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven, the Second Viennese School consisted of three twentieth-century composers: Arnold Schoenberg and his two students Alban Berg and Anton Webern. Though they shared a common purpose—pushing the limits of tonality beyond the breaking point, which eventually led to twelve-tone music—their compositional styles were very different from one another. Webern in particular stood apart from his colleagues: where Schoenberg and Berg hung on to elements of Romanticism, Webern’s music was stripped to its barest essentials. Prior to his tragic death, when he was mistakenly gunned down by an American G.I. during the post-World War II occupation of Austria, Webern amassed a small catalogue of short, sparsely textured works—an oeuvre held up as a model for the future by subsequent composers like Pierre Boulez and Karlheinz Stockhausen. “Bagatelle” is a catch-all term for short compositions in no specific form; possibly the most famous bagatelle is Beethoven’s little piano piece known as Für Elise. The bagatelle was a particularly well-suited receptacle for the miniaturist style that preoccupied Webern immediately before the First World War. Inspired by Schoenberg’s Six Little Pieces for Piano, Op. 19, Webern thought he could do more to shape a collection of miniatures into a cohesive set, full of drama and contrast yet on a very small scale. A whole series of compositions followed suit, with perhaps the most extreme example being his Six Bagatelles for String Quartet, Op. 9. Though rigorously composed, the six movements, which range in length from twenty seconds to just over a minute, seem to defy conventional explanation. Rather than individual movements, they should be considered as a series of passing moods, or a psychological drama in miniature. Quartet in G minor, Op. 10 composed in 1893 – duration: 25 minutes Claude Debussy (1862–1918) Claude Debussy lived through a pivotal era in French music. The French composers of the generation before his own (including Gabriel Fauré, Ernest Chausson, and Vincent d’Indy, as well as the Belgian César Franck), were entirely under the spell of Richard Wagner and imitated Wagner’s sumptuous instrumental textures and seemingly endless melodies. Debussy, it could be said, had mixed feelings about Wagner. On the one hand, he publically called Wagner’s distinct musical style “a beautiful sunset mistaken for a dawn.” Yet he grudgingly admired Wagner’s music and coveted the liberating potential of Wagnerism, with its forsaking of the rules of tonal music in favor of free expression. Certainly the young Debussy aspired to the same musical freedom Wagner enjoyed; he just wanted it on his own terms—and free from Germanic influence. Instead of German hegemony, Debussy looked for inspiration in more exotic sounds. When he was just starting his career in the early 1880s, Debussy spent three summers in Russia as the music instructor for Madame Nadezhda von Meck, who would later become famous as Tchaikovsky’s mysterious benefactor. There he had the opportunity to absorb the music of the Russian nationalists Borodin and Mussorgsky. Back in Paris, Debussy heard gamelan music from Java for the first time at the 1889 Exposition Universelle; its unusual tonality and trancelike rhythms had a profound influence on Debussy’s harmonic language throughout the course of his career. Possibly the most unusual source Debussy found inspiration in was the music of the past; during the 1890s, he took a brief interest in the old church modes— the scales used by medieval and renaissance composers before the rise of major and minor keys. All of these sources can be heard in one of Debussy’s most important early works: his only String Quartet. Rather conventionally for Debussy, his quartet is set in four movements: the first (Animé et très decide) opens not exactly in the indicated key of G minor, but more specifically in the closely related church mode of G Phrygian, giving this movement its unique tonal color right from the outset, a color that is amplified by the movement’s thick textures and deep timbres. Note well the opening theme of this movement: elements from it can be heard throughout the entire quartet. The second movement (Assez vif et bien rythmé) functions as a muted scherzo; its pizzicato effects can be traced back to Debussy’s recent Russian influence, while the harmonies reflect his exposure to Javanese gamelan music. The plaintive theme of the andantino third movement recalls the music of César Franck, whose cyclical compositions influenced the structural layout of this quartet. According to Debussy’s letters, it was the last movement that gave him the most trouble compositionally. The finale begins with a moderately-paced introduction (Très modéré) that at times feels like an operatic recitative, but it soon accelerates to a tensely imitative main section (Très mouvemente) culminating in a triumphant reference to the opening movement theme, thus ending the quartet where it began.