* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download PowerPoint 프레젠테이션
Hubble Space Telescope wikipedia , lookup
Lovell Telescope wikipedia , lookup
Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam wikipedia , lookup
Optical telescope wikipedia , lookup
Arecibo Observatory wikipedia , lookup
James Webb Space Telescope wikipedia , lookup
Allen Telescope Array wikipedia , lookup
Reflecting telescope wikipedia , lookup
Spitzer Space Telescope wikipedia , lookup
International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup
다양한 창문을 통한 우주 2017-05-05 1 내용 왜 다양한 창문? 대기의 영향 망원경의 성능 관측에서 얻는 정보 중요 망원경들 차세대 망원경들 2017-05-05 2 망원경의 성능 집광력 : 구경 제곱에 비례 분해능 : 구경에 비례 파장에 반비례 지구 대기에 의한 분해능의 저하 : 시상효과 광학 우주 망원경이 필요한 이유 배율 : 대물렌즈 부착 (확대) 검출기 (눈, 사진, CCD) : 상(image) ; 밝기, 위치, 분광기+검출기 : 스펙트럼 : 별의 구성물질에 대한 정보, 2017-05-05 3 Interferometry One of the reasons astronomers build big telescopes is to increase resolving power. Astronomers have been able to achieve very high resolution by connecting multiple telescopes together to work as if they were a single telescope. This method of synthesizing a larger telescope is known as interferometry. Interferometry To work as an interferometer, the separate small telescopes must combine their light through a network of mirrors. Also, the path that each light beam travels must be controlled so that it does not vary by more than some small fraction of the wavelength. Interferometry Turbulence in Earth’s atmosphere constantly distorts the light. High-speed computers must continuously adjust the light paths as Earth rotates. Interferometry As the wavelength of light is very short—roughly 0.0005 mm—building optical interferometers is one of the most difficult technical problems that astronomers face. Infrared- and radio-wavelength interferometers are slightly easier to build, because the wavelengths are longer. Interferometry A number of modern telescopes can work as interferometers. The VLT consists of four 8.2-m telescopes that can operate separately. These can be linked together through underground tunnels with three 1.8-m telescopes on the same mountaintop. The resulting optical interferometer provides the resolution of a telescope 200 meters in diameter. Interferometry The two Keck 10-m telescopes can be used as an interferometer. The CHARA array on Mt. Wilson combines six 1-meter telescopes to create the equivalent of a telescope one-fifth of a mile in diameter. The Large Binocular telescope can be used as an interferometer. Interferometry Although turbulence in Earth’s atmosphere can be partially averaged out in an interferometer, plans are being made to put interferometers in space. For example, the Space Interferometry Mission will work at optical wavelengths and study everything from the cores of erupting galaxies to planets orbiting nearby stars. Building Scientific Arguments Why do astronomers build observatories at the tops of mountains? To create this argument, you need to think about the powers of a telescope. Building Scientific Arguments Astronomers have joked that the hardest part of building a new observatory is constructing the road to the top of the mountain. It certainly isn’t easy to build a large, delicate telescope at the top of a high mountain. However, it is worth the effort. Building Scientific Arguments A telescope on top of a high mountain is above the thickest part of Earth’s atmosphere. There is less air to dim the light. There is less water vapor to absorb infrared radiation. Even more important, the thin air on a mountaintop causes less disturbance to the image. Consequently, the seeing is better. Building Scientific Arguments A large telescope on Earth’s surface has a resolving power much better than the distortion caused by Earth’s atmosphere. So, it is limited by seeing—not by its own diffraction. Building Scientific Arguments Astronomers not only build telescopes on mountaintops, they also build gigantic telescopes many meters in diameter. Revise your argument to focus on telescope design. What are the problems and advantages in building such giant telescopes? Special Instruments Just looking through a telescope doesn’t inform you of much. To use an astronomical telescope to learn about stars, you must be able to analyze the light the telescope gathers. Special instruments attached to the telescope make that possible. Imaging Systems The original imaging device in astronomy was the photographic plate. It could record faint objects in long time exposures and could be stored for later analysis. However, photographic plates have been almost entirely replaced in astronomy by electronic imaging systems. Imaging Systems Most modern astronomers use charge-coupled devices (CCDs) to record images. A CCD is a specialized computer chip containing roughly a million microscopic light detectors arranged in an array about the size of a postage stamp. These devices can be used like a small photographic plate. Imaging Systems CCDs have dramatic advantages. They can detect both bright and faint objects in a single exposure. They are much more sensitive than a photographic plate. They can be read directly into computer memory for later analysis. Imaging Systems Although CCDs for astronomy are extremely sensitive and therefore expensive, less sophisticated CCDs are used in video cameras and digital cameras. Imaging Systems The image from a CCD is stored as numbers in computer memory. So, it is easy to manipulate the image to bring out details that would not otherwise be visible. For example, astronomical images are often reproduced as negatives—with the sky white and the stars dark. This makes the faint parts of the image easier to see. Imaging Systems Astronomers also manipulate images to produce false-color images. In these, the colors represent different levels of intensity and are not related to the true colors of the object. Imaging Systems In the past, measurements of intensity and color were made using a photometer—a highly sensitive light meter attached to a telescope. Today, most such measurements are made on CCD images. As the CCD image is easily digitized, brightness and color can be measured to high precision. The Spectrograph To analyze light in detail, you need to spread the light according to wavelength into a spectrum—a task performed by a spectrograph. You can understand how this works if you reproduce an experiment performed by Isaac Newton in 1666. The Spectrograph Boring a hole in his window shutter, Newton admitted a thin beam of sunlight into his darkened bedroom. When he placed a prism in the beam, the sunlight spread into a beautiful spectrum on the far wall. From this, he concluded that white light was made of a mixture of all the colors. The Spectrograph Newton didn’t think in terms of wavelength. However, you can use this modern concept to see that the light passing through the prism is bent at an angle that depends on the wavelength. Violet (shortest wavelength) bends most and red (longest wavelength) least. Thus, the white light that enters the prism is spread into a spectrum. The Spectrograph A typical prism spectrograph contains more than one prism, to spread the light farther, and lenses, to guide the light into the prism and to focus the light into the camera. However, nearly all modern spectrographs use a grating in place of a prism. The Spectrograph A grating is a piece of glass with thousands of microscopic parallel lines scribed onto its surface. Different wavelengths of light reflect from the grating at slightly different angles. So, white light is spread into a spectrum and can be recorded, often by a CCD camera. The Spectrograph You can see this effect if you tilt a CD or DVD in bright light. The colors that flash across its surface are produced as different wavelengths of light are reflected at different angles from the closely spaced grooves. The Spectrograph Recording the spectrum of a faint star or galaxy can require a long time exposure. So, astronomers have developed multiobject spectrographs that can record the spectra of as many as 100 objects simultaneously. The Spectrograph Fiber optic strands collect the light from many objects in the field of view and pipe the light to a single spectrograph. In some cases, a robotic arm can rapidly place the fibers in the right place—to collect light from many galaxies in the telescope’s field of view. Such multiobject spectrographs automated by computers have made possible large surveys of many thousands of stars or galaxies. The Spectrograph The spectrum of an astronomical object can contain hundreds of spectral lines produced by the atoms in the object. As astronomers must measure the wavelength of the lines in a spectrum, they use a comparison spectrum as a calibration of their spectrograph. The Spectrograph Special bulbs built into the spectrograph produce bright lines given off by such atoms as thorium and argon or neon. The wavelengths of these spectral lines have been measured to high precision in the laboratory. So, astronomers can use spectra of these light sources like roadmaps to measure wavelengths and identify spectral lines in the spectrum of a star, galaxy, or planet. The Spectrograph As astronomers understand how light interacts with matter, a spectrum carries a tremendous amount of information. That makes a spectrograph the astronomer’s most powerful instrument. An astronomer recently remarked, “We don’t know anything about an object till we get a spectrum.” Building Scientific Arguments What is the difference between light going through a lens and light passing through a prism? When you think about natural processes, it is often helpful to compare similar things. Scientific arguments often make such comparisons. A few simple rules explain most natural events. So, the similarities are often revealing. Building Scientific Arguments What is the difference between light going through a lens and light passing through a prism? When you think about natural processes, it is often helpful to compare similar things. Scientific arguments often make such comparisons. A few simple rules explain most natural events. So, the similarities are often revealing. Building Scientific Arguments A refracting telescope producing chromatic aberration and a prism dispersing light into a spectrum are two examples of the same phenomenon. However, one is bad and one is good. Building Scientific Arguments When light passes through the curved surfaces of a lens, different wavelengths are bent by slightly different amounts— and the different colors of light come to focus at different focal lengths. This produces the color fringes in an image called chromatic aberration—and that’s bad. Building Scientific Arguments However, the surfaces of a prism are made to be precisely flat. All the light enters the prism at the same angle, and any given wavelength is bent by the same amount. Thus, white light is dispersed into a spectrum. You could call the dispersion of light by a prism ‘controlled chromatic aberration’—and that’s good. Building Scientific Arguments Now, you can build your own argument comparing similar things. CCDs have been very good for astronomy, and they have almost completely replaced photographic plates. How are CCD chips similar to photographic plates? How are they better? Radio Telescopes A radio telescope is a device that measures the strength of radio waves coming from a small spot on the sky at a specific wavelength. Radio Telescopes Many objects in the universe emit radio waves. Thus, radio observations can reveal a great deal about some celestial bodies. Earth’s atmosphere is transparent to a wide range of radio wavelengths in what is called the radio window. So, radio astronomers can study the sky from Earth’s surface. Operation of a Radio Telescope A radio telescope usually consists of four parts—a dish reflector, an antenna, an amplifier, and a recorder. The components, working together, make it possible for astronomers to detect radio radiation from celestial objects. Operation of a Radio Telescope The dish reflector of a radio telescope, like the mirror of a reflecting telescope, collects and focuses radiation. As radio waves are much longer than light waves, the dish need not be as smooth as a mirror. In some radio telescopes, the reflector may not even be dish-shaped, or the telescope may contain no reflector at all. Operation of a Radio Telescope Whereas the dish may be many meters in diameter, the antenna may be as small as your hand. Like the antenna on a TV set, its only function is to absorb the radio energy and direct it along a cable to an amplifier. Operation of a Radio Telescope After amplification, the signal goes to some kind of recording instrument. Most radio observatories record data into computer memory. Operation of a Radio Telescope Humans can’t see radio waves. So, astronomers must convert them into something perceptible. Operation of a Radio Telescope One way is to measure the strength of the radio signal at various places in the sky and draw a map in which contours mark areas of uniform radio intensity. Operation of a Radio Telescope You might compare such a map to a seating diagram for a baseball stadium in which the contours mark areas in which the seats have the same price. Operation of a Radio Telescope Contour maps are very common in radio astronomy and are often reproduced using false colors. Limitations of the Radio Telescope A radio astronomer works under three handicaps: Poor resolution Low intensity Interference Limitations of the Radio Telescope You have learned that the resolving power of an optical telescope depends on the diameter of the objective lens or mirror. It also depends on the wavelength of the radiation. Limitations of the Radio Telescope At very long wavelengths—like those of radio waves—the diffraction fringes become very large. That makes the images fuzzy. As with an optical telescope, the larger the telescope, the smaller the fringes and the better the resolution. Thus, radio telescopes must be quite large. Limitations of the Radio Telescope Even so, the resolving power of a radio telescope is not good. A dish 30 m in diameter receiving radiation with a wavelength of 21 cm has a resolving power of about 0.5°. Such a radio telescope would be unable to show you any details in the sky smaller than the moon. Limitations of the Radio Telescope Fortunately, radio astronomers can combine two or more radio telescopes to form a radio interferometer capable of much higher resolution. The Very Large Array (VLA) consists of 27 dish antennas spread in a Y-shape across the New Mexico desert. In combination, the antennas have the resolving power of a radio telescope 36 km (22 mi) in diameter. Limitations of the Radio Telescope The VLA can resolve details smaller than 1 second of arc. Eight new dish antennas being added across New Mexico will give the VLA 10 times better resolving power. Limitations of the Radio Telescope Another large radio interferometer—the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA)— consists of matched radio dishes spread from Hawaii to the Virgin Islands. It has an effective diameter almost as large as Earth. Limitations of the Radio Telescope The second handicap radio astronomers face is the low intensity of the radio signals. You have learned that the energy of a photon depends on its wavelength. Photons of radio energy have such long wavelengths that their individual energies are quite low. To get strong signals focused on the antenna, the radio astronomer must build large collecting dishes. Limitations of the Radio Telescope The largest fully steerable radio telescope in the world is at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory in Green Bank, West Virginia. The telescope has a reflecting surface 100 m in diameter—big enough to hold an entire football field—and can be pointed anywhere in the sky. Its surface consists of 2004 computer-controlled panels that adjust to maintain the shape of the reflecting surface. Limitations of the Radio Telescope The largest radio dish in the world is 300 m (1,000 ft) in diameter. So large a dish can’t be supported in the usual way. Thus, it is built into a mountain valley in Arecibo, Puerto Rico. Limitations of the Radio Telescope The reflecting dish is a thin metallic surface supported above the valley floor by cables attached near the rim. The antenna hangs above the dish on cables from three towers built on three mountain peaks that surround the valley. Limitations of the Radio Telescope This telescope is not fully steerable. It can look only overhead. However, the operators can change its aim slightly by moving the antenna above the dish and waiting for Earth’s rotation to point the telescope in the proper direction. Limitations of the Radio Telescope This telescope is not fully steerable. It can look only overhead. However, the operators can change its aim slightly by moving the antenna above the dish and waiting for Earth’s rotation to point the telescope in the proper direction. Limitations of the Radio Telescope The third handicap a radio astronomer faces is interference. A radio telescope is an extremely sensitive radio receiver listening to radio signals thousands of times weaker than artificial radio and TV transmissions. Such weak signals are easily drowned out by interference. Sources of such interference include everything from poorly designed transmitters in Earth satellites to automobiles with faulty ignition systems. Limitations of the Radio Telescope To avoid this kind of interference, radio astronomers locate their telescopes as far from civilization as possible. Hidden deep in mountain valleys, they are able to listen to the sky—protected from human-made radio noise. Limitations of the Radio Telescope To avoid this kind of interference, radio astronomers locate their telescopes as far from civilization as possible. Hidden deep in mountain valleys, they are able to listen to the sky—protected from human-made radio noise. Advantages of Radio Telescopes Building large radio telescopes in isolated locations is expensive. However, three factors make it all worthwhile. Advantages of Radio Telescopes First, and most important, a radio telescope can show where clouds of cool hydrogen are located between the stars. As 90 percent of the atoms in the universe are hydrogen, that is important information. Large clouds of cool hydrogen are completely invisible to normal telescopes—because they produce no visible light of their own and reflect too little to be detected on photographs. Advantages of Radio Telescopes However, cool hydrogen emits a radio signal at the specific wavelength of 21 cm. The only way to detect these clouds of gas is with a radio telescope that receives 21-cm radiation. These hydrogen clouds are the places where stars are born. Advantages of Radio Telescopes There is a second reason why large radio telescopes are worthwhile. As radio signals have relatively long wavelengths, they can penetrate the vast clouds of dust that obscure the view at visual wavelengths. Advantages of Radio Telescopes Light waves are short, and they interact with tiny dust grains floating in space. Thus, the light is scattered and never penetrates the dust to reach optical telescopes on Earth. However, radio signals from far across the galaxy pass unhindered through the dust—giving radio astronomers an unobscured view. Advantages of Radio Telescopes Finally, a radio telescope can help astronomers understand the complex processes that go on in clouds of gas in space. It can detect radio emission from many different molecules that form naturally in these clouds. Furthermore, certain high-energy processes—such as hot gas trapped in magnetic fields—emit characteristic radio signals. Radio telescopes can help astronomers understand such violent processes as exploding stars and erupting galaxies. Building Scientific Arguments Why do optical astronomers build big telescopes, whereas radio astronomers build groups of widely separated smaller telescopes? Once again, you can learn a lot by building a scientific argument based on comparison. Building Scientific Arguments Optical astronomers try to maximize light-gathering power. Radio astronomers, in contrast, try to maximize resolving power. As radio waves are so much longer than light waves, a single radio telescope can’t see details in the sky much smaller than the moon. Building Scientific Arguments By linking radio telescopes miles apart, radio astronomers build a radio interferometer that can simulate a radio telescope miles in diameter and thus increase the resolving power. Building Scientific Arguments The difference between the wavelengths of light and radio waves makes a big difference in building the best telescopes. Keep that difference in mind as you build a new argument. Why don’t radio astronomers want to build their telescopes on mountaintops as optical astronomers do? Astronomy from Space You have learned about the observations that ground-based telescopes can make through the two atmospheric windows in the visible and radio parts of the electromagnetic spectrum. Astronomy from Space You have learned about the observations that ground-based telescopes can make through the two atmospheric windows in the visible and radio parts of the electromagnetic spectrum. Astronomy from Space Most of the rest of the electromagnetic radiation—infrared, ultraviolet, X ray, and gamma ray—never reaches Earth’s surface. To observe at these wavelengths, telescopes must fly above the atmosphere in high-flying aircraft, rockets, balloons, and satellites. Astronomy from Space Before you blast off, you should check out the extreme limits of astronomy from Earth’s surface. Some observations can be made in the nearinfrared and the near-ultraviolet. The Ends of the Visual Spectrum Astronomers can observe in the nearinfrared just beyond the red end of the visible spectrum. Some of this infrared radiation leaks through the atmosphere in narrow, partially open atmospheric windows scattered from 1,200 nm to about 40,000 nm. The Ends of the Visual Spectrum Infrared astronomers usually measure wavelength in micrometers (10-6 meters). So, they refer to this wavelength range as 1.2 to 40 micrometers or microns. In this range, much of the radiation is absorbed by water vapor, carbon dioxide, and oxygen molecules in Earth’s atmosphere. Thus, it is an advantage to place telescopes on mountains—where the air is thin and dry. The Ends of the Visual Spectrum For example, a number of important infrared telescopes observe from the 4,150-m (13,600-ft) summit of Mauna Kea in Hawaii. At this altitude, they are above much of the water vapor—which is the main absorber of infrared. The Ends of the Visual Spectrum The far-infrared range—which includes wavelengths longer than 40 micrometers—can reveal the secrets of planets, comets, forming stars, and other cool objects. However, these wavelengths are absorbed high in the atmosphere. The Ends of the Visual Spectrum To observe in the far-infrared, telescopes must venture to high altitudes. Remotely operated infrared telescopes suspended under balloons have reached altitudes as high as 41 km (25 mi). The Ends of the Visual Spectrum For many years, a NASA jet transport carried a 91-cm infrared telescope and a crew of astronomers to altitudes of 12,000 m (40,000 ft)—to get above 99 percent of the water vapor in Earth’s atmosphere. The Ends of the Visual Spectrum Now retired from service, that airborne observatory will soon be replaced with the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA)—a Boeing 747 that will carry a 2.5-m telescope to the fringes of the atmosphere. The Ends of the Visual Spectrum If a telescope observes in the near-infrared, the detector on which the radiation falls must be cooled. Infrared radiation is absorbed as heat. If the detector is warm, it is impossible to tell the difference between the infrared radiation and the heat in the detector. The Ends of the Visual Spectrum Such detectors are usually cooled with liquid nitrogen. The Ends of the Visual Spectrum If a telescope observes at farinfrared wavelengths, then the entire telescope must be cooled. An astronomer observing a bright star at 10 micrometers with an uncooled telescope on a high mountaintop described it as “like trying to observe a star in the daytime with a telescope that is on fire.” The Ends of the Visual Spectrum At the short-wavelength end of the spectrum, astronomers can observe in the near ultraviolet. Your eyes do not detect this radiation. However, it can be recorded by photographic plates and CCDs. The Ends of the Visual Spectrum Wavelengths shorter than about 290 nm, the far-ultraviolet, are completely absorbed by the ozone layer extending from 20 km to about 40 km above Earth’s surface. The Ends of the Visual Spectrum No mountain is that high, and no balloon or airplane can fly that high. So, astronomers cannot observe in the farultraviolet—without going into space. Telescopes in Space To observe far beyond the ends of the visible spectrum, astronomical telescopes must go above Earth’s atmosphere into space. Telescopes in Space This is very expensive and difficult. However, it is the only way to study some processes. Stars are born inside clouds of gas and dust—and visible wavelengths cannot escape from these dust clouds. Only observations in the infrared can reveal the secrets of star formation. Black holes are small and hard to detect. However, matter flowing into a black hole emits X rays. Telescopes in Space Many space telescopes are small satellites designed to make specific observations for a short period. Some, though, are large general purpose telescopes. Telescopes in Space Decades ago, astronomers developed a plan to place a series of great observatories in space. Those space telescopes have revolutionized human understanding of what you are and where you are in the universe. Telescopes in Space There are three points to note about these great observatories in space. First, not only can a telescope in space observe at a wide range of wavelengths, but it is above the atmospheric blurring called seeing. The Hubble Space Telescope observes mostly at visual wavelengths and has the advantage of sharp images undistorted by seeing. Telescopes in Space Second, these telescopes must be specialized for their wavelength range. The Compton Gamma Ray Observatory had special detectors. The Chandra X Ray Observatory must have cylindrical mirrors, The Spitzer Infrared Observatory must have cooled optics. Telescopes in Space Finally, the Hubble Space Telescope has been maintained by visits from astronauts. Such visits are expensive, though—and the future of Hubble is in doubt. Telescopes in Space Astronauts cannot reach the Chandra and Spitzer telescopes. The Compton Observatory was removed from orbit in 2000. Telescopes in Space Space observatories have limited lifetimes. Astronomers are already planning the next great observatory in space. The new James Webb Space Telescope, though, will not be available for many years. Telescopes in Space Many people think that the Hubble Space Telescope and other space telescopes are put in space to get closer to the objects they study. That is a common misconception. Of course, you could explain that space telescopes go into orbit to get above Earth’s atmosphere and avoid seeing distortions and the absorption of wavelengths outside the two atmospheric windows. Telescopes in Space These great observatories in space are controlled from research centers on Earth and are open to proposals from any astronomer with a good idea. Competition is fierce, though. Only the most worthy projects win approval. Building Scientific Arguments Why can infrared astronomers observe from high mountaintops, whereas X-ray astronomers must observe from space? Once again, you can analyze this question by building a scientific argument based on comparison. Building Scientific Arguments Infrared radiation is absorbed by water vapor in Earth’s atmosphere. If you built an infrared telescope on top of a high mountain, you would be above most of the water vapor in the atmosphere. Thus, you could collect some infrared radiation from the stars. Building Scientific Arguments However, the longer-wavelength infrared radiation is absorbed much higher in the atmosphere. You couldn’t observe it from the mountaintop. X rays are absorbed in the uppermost layers of the atmosphere. You would not be able to find any mountain high enough to get an X-ray telescope above those absorbing layers. Building Scientific Arguments To observe the stars at X-ray wavelengths, you would need to put your telescope in space, above Earth’s atmosphere. Building Scientific Arguments Now, build another argument. Why must the Hubble Space Telescope be in space when it observes in the visual wavelength range? 관측에서 얻는 정보 :빛-분광 천체의 위치 : 측성 천체의 밝기 : 측광 천체의 운동 : 스펙트럼 = 분광 관측 천체의 구성 원소 : 스펙트럼 = 분광관측 고온의 밀집된 기체 덩어리 또는 액체 고체 – 흑체복사 온도가 높을수록 파란색의 빛을 많이 냄. 모든 원자는 고유의 주파수를 가지고 있다. 일종의 지문 같은 것 빛을 주파수 또는 파장별로 분석을 하면 천체에 있는 원소가 무엇인지를 알 수 있다. 2017-05-05 110 2017-05-05 111 2017-05-05 112 먼 곳의 천체의 운동은 어떻게 아나? -> 도플러 효과 이용 소리에서의 음, 빛에서의 색 -> 사람이 진동수를 감지하는 방법 단위시간당 진동수가 크면 고음, 파란색 진동수를 증가시키는 방법 테이프를 빨리 돌린다. 서로 접근한다. 2017-05-05 113 2017-05-05 114 차세대 지상 광학 망원경 GMT : 7 * 8 m (24.8 m ;2018) TMT : 492 segments (30m : 2018) E-ELT : 5 mirrors (42 m : 2020) 2017-05-05 2017-05-05 116