* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Canadian Syncope Risk Score to Identify Patients at Risk for
Cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Myocardial infarction wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
The Canadian Syncope Risk Score to Identify Patients at Risk for SAE after ED Disposition CAEP Edmonton May 2015 Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy MBBS Kenneth Kwong BSc Marco Sivilotti MD Brian Rowe MD George Wells PhD Robert Sheldon MD Eddy Lang MD Muhammad Mukarram MBBS Andrew McRae MD Monica Taljaard PhD Ian Stiell MD Department of Emergency Medicine Ottawa Hospital Research Institute University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Funded by the Physicians’ Incorporated Foundation, Ontario Innovation Fund and Canadian Institutes of Health Research No Financial COI to Disclose Syncope: The Clinical Problem 1% of all ED visits 7 – 23% suffer serious adverse events (SAE) with 50% occurring after ED disposition Risk‐stratification is challenging Previous attempts to develop a robust tool unsuccessful Small, retrospective, no statistical methods Methodological flaws Prior Work Validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule (N=505) Ann Emerg Med 2010 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Position Paper Can J Cardio 2011 Standardized Reporting Guidelines Acad Emerg Med 2012 Risk Factors for Serious Outcomes (N=505) CJEM 2013 Need for Standardization and Risk‐Stratification (N=3,662) Intern Emerg Med 2015 Outcomes among Non‐Sinus Rhythm Patients (N=4,335) Int J Cardiol 2015 Objective Derive a clinical decision tool for identification of patients at‐risk for serious adverse events within 30‐days after ED disposition Methods Design: Prospective cohort study Setting: 6 Canadian academic EDs Study Period: 41 months (Oct 2010 to Feb 2014) Subjects: Adult (≥ 16 years) with syncope who presented to ED within 24 hours Exclusions: Previously enrolled, prolonged LOC (> 5 min), mental status changes, obvious witnessed seizure, significant trauma, intoxicated ‐ alcohol/illicit drug, or language barrier Ethics: Only verbal consent was required for inclusion into the study Methods – Study Protocol Training sessions Consecutive patients screened and enrolled Data collection: 37 variables (18 categorical and 19 continuous) Categorical Variables: Sex 6 event characteristics, 2 medical history (vascular disease – 3 variables, heart disease – 5 variables), 2 family history Final ED diagnosis (vasovagal, cardiac, others) at disposition Lab test: Troponin >99th percentile 4 ECG: Blocks, axis deviation, ventricular hypertrophy, old ischemia Methods – Study Protocol 19 Continuous Variables: Age 11 ED vitals: 6 BPs, 3 pulse rates, triage respiratory rate and O2 saturation 4 Lab tests: Hemoglobin, hematocrit, BUN, and creatinine 3 ECG: QRS axis, QRS duration and cQT interval Methods Outcome Measures: Death, MI, arrhythmias, structural heart disease, aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, severe pulmonary HTN, SAH, significant hemorrhage, or any serious condition that requires intervention Outcome Assessment: Review of medical records Telephone follow‐up Review of records in local hospitals All SAE confirmed by an independent blinded Adjudication Committee of 3 physicians Methods – Data Analysis Excluded those with SAE in the ED Variables excluded: Fewer than 5 events >25% missing values Kappa <0.4 Univariate analysis Multiple imputation for missing variables Cut‐points using clinical rationale and ROC curve Multivariable logistic regression Internal validation Patient Flow Visits Screened N=11,998 Potentially Eligible Syncope Visits N=6,158 Patients Included N=4,326 Not Syncope = 4,357 Prolonged LOC = 340 Seizure = 253 Change in Mental Status = 142 Head Trauma = 167 Alcohol/Drug Related = 113 Significant Trauma = 72 Language Barrier = 76 LWBS = 165 Double Enrollments = 129 Refused = 155 Not Enrolled = 1,263 Serious Outcome in the ED = 285 Lost to Follow‐Up = 292 (6.7%) Included in Final Analysis N=4,034 (93.2%) Patient with Serious Outcomes N=147 (3.6%) Patient Characteristics (N=4,034) Mean Age in Years Range Female (%) Arrival by Ambulance (%) 53.6 (23.0) 16 to 102 55.6 64.3 ED Investigations Performed (%) ECG 95.1 Blood Tests 85.5 Disposition (%) ED Referral for Consultations Hospitalizations 17.5 9.5 30‐Day SAE (N=4,034) Serious Outcomes Total Deaths Deaths – Cause Unknown Cardiac New/Uncontrolled Afib or SVT Sinus Node Dysfunction High Grade AV Block ACS Ventricular Arrhythmia Device Insertion/Malfunction Structural HD or Dissection Significant Hemorrhage Pulmonary Embolism Others* Total N=147 Inpatient N=86 21 14 98 9 18 9 11 15 24 12 10 8 17 8 3 65 1 10 6 6 11 21 10 6 6 6 Outside Hospital N=61 13 11 33 8 8 3 5 4 3 2 4 2 11 Variables for Logistic Regression Low Events: Not significant: FHx congenital HD and sudden death 4 event variables: witnessed, palpitations prior, activity or orthostatic symptoms All blocks except LBBB Old ischemia Axis deviations (RAD, LAD) Triage DBP, triage HR, lowest HR Low prevalence at abnormal values: Triage O2 saturation Hemoglobin 22 predictor variables were selected for logistic regression Predictors for Logistic Regression Variable Age > 75 Years Female Vascular Disease Heart Disease Valvular Heart Disease Cardiomyopathy Congestive Heart Failure Coronary Artery Disease Non‐Sinus Rhythm Vasovagal Predisposition SAE No SAE P‐Value N=147 N=3,887 49.0 22.4 <0.0001 42.9 56.0 0.0016 10.9 6.3 0.02 56.5 19.3 <0.0001 15.7 2.9 <0.0001 8.8 0.9 <0.0001 15.0 3.3 <0.0001 31.3 11.1 <0.0001 30.7 9.2 <0.0001 12.9 42.9 <0.0001 Predictors for Logistic Regression Variable Prodrome Any SBP <90 or >180mmHg Lowest ED DBP <50mmHg Highest ED DBP >110mmHg Highest ED Heart Rate>110/min Triage Respiratory Rate >20/min Troponin >99th Percentile Hematocrit <0.3 Urea >12mmol/L Creatinine >150µmol/L SAE No SAE P‐Value N=147 N=3,887 56.9 31.3 20.6 8.2 12.2 10.1 25.2 9.0 15.7 11.7 76.1 11.6 9.1 2.4 6.4 3.5 3.4 3.5 5.6 5.4 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0047 0.0002 <0.0001 0.0007 <0.0001 0.0012 Predictors for Logistic Regression Variable Left Bundle Branch Block Left Ventricular Hypertrophy QRS Duration >130 msec Abnormal Axis (<‐30 or >110) cQT Interval >480 msec ED Diagnosis Vasovagal Syncope Cardiac Syncope SAE No SAE P‐Value N=147 N=3,887 11.4 2.3 <0.0001 9.9 5.5 0.03 31.6 5.1 <0.0001 32.3 8.3 <0.0001 38.4 6.4 <0.0001 13.2 35.4 55.7 <0.0001 5.0 <0.0001 Independent Predictors of SAEs from Logistic Regression (N=4,034) Variable Vasovagal Predisposition Heart Disease ED SBP <90 or >180 mmHg ED Diagnosis Vasovagal Syncope ED Diagnosis Cardiac Syncope Troponin >99th Percentile Abnormal QRS Axis (<‐30; >110) QRS Duration > 130 msec cQT Interval >480 msec OR (95% CI) 0.5 (0.3‐0.9) 1.7 (1.2‐2.5) 2.3 (1.5‐3.4) 0.4 (0.2‐0.7) 3.6 (2.3‐5.5) 3.5 (2.1‐5.6) 1.7 (1.1‐2.8) 1.9 (1.1‐3.2) 2.9 (1.8‐4.5) Beta ‐0.6 0.5 0.8 ‐1.0 1.3 1.2 0.6 0.6 1.1 Hosmer‐Lemeshow Goodness‐of‐fit p‐value = 0.12 Area under ROC curve (optimism corrected)= 0.86 (95% CI 0.83, 0.89) Internal Validation ‐ Boot Strapping Classification Performance of the CSRS Score Sensitivity Specificity Quick Disposition ‐2 99% 26% 44.3% ‐1 98% 46% 54.7% Potential Admissions ≥ 3 65% 91% 10.9% ≥ 4 51% 95% 6.4% Summary The Canadian Syncope Risk Score has the potential to: Standardize ED management of syncope patients Accurately risk‐stratification for evidence‐based disposition decision‐making Reduce the proportion of patients suffering SAE outside the hospital Reduce admissions in some centers Identify patients for observation units and hospitalization Limitations One‐fifth of eligible patients were not enrolled Half of the patients did not have troponin levels measured A small proportion of patients lost to follow‐up ED diagnosis part of the model Needs to be prospectively validated before application into clinical practice Conclusion Once prospectively validated the Canadian Syncope Risk Scale has the potential to improve acute management of syncope patients Acknowledgements Physicians for completion of the data forms Clerks and Nurses who ensure compliance Research teams at the study sites Drs. Hina Chaudry and Roos Ramaekers RNs: Pam Ladouceur, Sarah Gaudet and Karen Pratt Laura Baker, Natacha Leduc, Marco Guarino, Cynthia Campbell, Alex Viau, Brittany Mutsaers and Tauralee Tenn Angela Marcantonio and Cathy Clement Soo‐Min Kim Groups With and Without Troponin Variables Excluded Variable SAE N=147 No SAE N=3,887 P‐Value Event Witnessed 68.3 71.1 0.46 Palpitations Prior 3.5 5.6 0.29 Activity High‐Risk 43.8 39.4 0.29 Orthostatic Symptoms 18.9 21.2 0.51 Old Ischemia 6.8 4.6 0.23 Variables Excluded Variable SAE N=147 No SAE N=3,887 P‐Value Triage DBP (mmHg) 74.2 73.7 0.71 Triage Heart Rate 79.1 77.4 0.38 Lowest Heart Rate 67.9 69.9 0.17 Variable SAE N=147 No SAE N=3,887 P‐Value Triage O2 Saturation (%) 94.4 96.6 <0.0001 Hemoglobin (g/L) 127.9 134.8 0.0002 22 predictor variables were selected for logistic regression Predictors for Logistic Regression Variable Age in Years Age > 75 Years Females Vascular Disease Heart Disease Valvular Heart Disease Cardiomyopathy Congestive Heart Failure Coronary Artery Disease Non‐Sinus Rhythm SAE No SAE P‐Value N=147 N=3,887 71.6 52.9 <0.0001 49.0 22.4 <0.0001 42.9 56.0 0.0016 10.9 6.3 0.02 56.5 19.3 <0.0001 15.7 2.9 <0.0001 8.8 0.9 <0.0001 15.0 3.3 <0.0001 31.3 11.1 <0.0001 30.7 9.2 <0.0001 Predictors for Logistic Regression Variable Vasovagal Predisposition Prodrome Triage SBP (mmHg) Highest SBP in ED Any SBP <90 or >180mmHg Lowest ED DBP Lowest ED DBP <50mmHg Highest ED DBP Highest ED DBP >110mmHg SAE No SAE P‐Value N=147 N=3,887 12.9 56.9 133.3 149.1 31.3 61.6 20.6 83.6 8.2 42.9 76.1 125.3 137.1 11.6 65.3 9.1 80.4 2.4 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.005 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.01 <0.0001 0.03 <0.0001 Predictors for Logistic Regression Variable SAE No SAE P‐Value N=147 N=3,887 Highest ED Heart Rate 87.2 84.0 0.05 Highest ED Heart Rate>110/min 12.2 6.4 0.0047 Triage Respiratory Rate 18.0 17.2 0.04 Triage Respiratory Rate >20/min 10.1 3.5 0.0002 Troponin >99th Percentile 25.2 3.4 <0.0001 Hematocrit 0.38 0.40 0.0003 Hematocrit <0.3 9.0 3.5 0.0007 Urea 8.8 6.4 <0.0001 Urea >12mmol/L 15.7 5.6 <0.0001 Creatinine 109.5 88.4 0.0002 Creatinine >150µmol/L 11.7 5.4 0.0012 Predictors for Logistic Regression Variable Left Bundle Branch Block Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Mean QRS Duration QRS Duration >130 msec Mean QRS Axis Abnormal Axis (<‐30 or >110) Mean cQT Interval cQT Interval >480 msec ED Diagnosis Vasovagal Syncope Cardiac Syncope SAE No SAE P‐Value N=147 N=3,887 11.4 2.3 <0.0001 9.9 5.5 0.03 111.1 93.0 <0.0001 31.6 5.1 <0.0001 16.0 35.6 0.0003 32.3 8.3 <0.0001 463.6 431.7 <0.0001 38.4 6.4 <0.0001 13.2 35.4 55.7 <0.0001 5.0 <0.0001