Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Foreign Direct Investment in an Emerging Market: Implications for Policy-Making in Kazakhstan DISSERTATION of the University of St.Gallen, Graduate School of Business Administration, Economics, Law and Social Sciences (HSG) To obtain the title of Doctor Oeconomiae submitted by Vladimir Sukhoruchenko from Kazakhstan Approved on the application of Prof. Dr. Li-Choy Chong and Prof. Dr. Klaus Spremann Dissertation no. 3410 Aktobe-Press, Aktobe The University of St.Gallen, Graduate School of Business Administration, Economics, Law and Social Sciences (HSG) hereby consents to the printing of the present dissertation, without hereby expressing any opinion on the views herein expressed. St.Gallen, October 15, 2007 The President: Prof. Ernst Mohr, PhD Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................... i Abbreviations and expressions ............................................................................................. iv Table of Exhibits ................................................................................................................... v 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Problem presentation ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective and research questions ..................................................................................... 3 1.3 Research Methodology .................................................................................................... 5 1.3.1 Research Design ........................................................................................................... 5 1.3.2 Data collection methods................................................................................................ 6 1.3.2.1 Interviewing. .............................................................................................................. 6 1.3.2.2 Archival Analysis ...................................................................................................... 8 1.3.2.3 Mail Survey. .............................................................................................................. 9 1.3.3 Data Analysis. ............................................................................................................... 9 2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................................... 11 2.1 Foreign direct investment as a strategic decision of the firm ......................................... 11 2.1.1 Major foreign direct investment theories .................................................................... 11 2.1.2 Types of investment .................................................................................................... 17 2.1.3 Strategic management view on the investor ................................................................ 21 2.1.4 Adapting the strategy-performance model for investment studies .............................. 24 2.2 Theories of Foreign Direct Investment .......................................................................... 31 2.2.1 Explanation of FDI ..................................................................................................... 32 2.2.2 Econometric studies on Influence of Tax Policy on Investment ................................. 32 2.2.3 Micro-Theories ........................................................................................................... 33 2.2.4 Eclectic Paradigm ....................................................................................................... 34 2.2.5 Macro-economic Theories .......................................................................................... 36 2.3 Motivational studies and Risk in Decision process ........................................................ 37 2.3.1 Motivational studies.................................................................................................... 37 2.3.2 Motives for FDI .......................................................................................................... 37 2.3.3 Risk theories ............................................................................................................... 39 2.4 Modes of entry strategies ............................................................................................... 39 2.5 Political environment in the context of international investment ................................... 41 i 2.5.1 Political environment as a parts of the firm's general environment............................. 42 2.5.2 The specific role of the political environment............................................................. 46 2.5.3 Political relations having an impact on international investment ................................ 58 2.5.4 Summary: The role of the political environment for the firm's investment decision .. 62 2.6 Summary of the Literature review ................................................................................. 64 3 OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................ 71 3.1 The General Reform Environment ................................................................................. 71 3.1.1 Political Environment ................................................................................................. 71 3.1.2 Regional Issues ........................................................................................................... 72 3.1.3 Social conditions ......................................................................................................... 73 3.1.4 Environment ............................................................................................................... 74 3.1.5 Legal ........................................................................................................................... 74 3.2 Progress in Transition and the Economy's Response ..................................................... 76 3.2.1 Macroeconomic conditions for Bank operations......................................................... 76 3.2.2 Transition success and transition challenges ............................................................. 78 3.3 Access to Capital and Investment Requirements ........................................................... 83 3.4. Investment Opportunities in Central Asia and Transcaucasus ...................................... 86 3.5. Investment Opportunities in Kazakhstan ...................................................................... 87 3.5.1. Investment key: Comparative Study .......................................................................... 87 3.5.2. Investment Activities in Kazakhstan .......................................................................... 92 3.5.3 Attractiveness for foreign investors ............................................................................ 95 3.5.4. Risk for Investors ....................................................................................................... 96 3.5.5. Foreign investment law .............................................................................................. 96 3.6. Foreign experience of engaging and use of the international capital and investments .. 97 4 CASE STUDIES............................................................................................................. 103 4.1 Chevron in Kazakhstan ................................................................................................ 103 4.1.1 Environmental Issues ................................................................................................ 105 4.1.2 Social Issues ............................................................................................................. 111 4.1.3 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 115 4.2 FDI in Mining Sector of Kazakhstan ........................................................................... 117 4.2.1 Economic and Political Factors................................................................................. 117 4.2.2 Industry related Factors ............................................................................................ 121 4.2.3 Environmental Implications ...................................................................................... 124 4.2.4 Summing Up ............................................................................................................. 125 4.2.5 Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 126 ii 5 DISCUSSION: KAZAKHSTAN.................................................................................... 128 5.1 Objectives, trends and performance in relation to FDI ................................................ 128 5.2 Strengths, weaknesses and opportunities ..................................................................... 132 5.3 Policy and Operational Framework for FDI ................................................................ 136 5.3.1 The overall legal framework ..................................................................................... 136 5.3.2 Administrative procedures and practices .................................................................. 150 5.1.3 Overall assessment of the policy and operational framework ................................... 155 5.4 Policy Options and Recommendations ........................................................................ 156 5.4.1 Common Recomendation.......................................................................................... 156 5.4.2 Recommendations for government action................................................................. 157 5.4.3 Recommendations for subregional and regional cooperation ................................... 159 5.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 159 References ......................................................................................................................... 164 Appendices ........................................................................................................................ 189 iii Abbreviations and expressions ABA American Bar Association BOD Board of Directors (Administration) CFR Code of Federal Regulations COMECOM or CMEA Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (economic cooperation organization in former communist block) DC Directorate Committee FCC Federal Communication Commission FDI Foreign Direct Investment GEO Governmental Emergency Ordinance GO Governmental Ordinance GSM General Shareholders Meeting JV Joint Venture MIGA Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency NAC National Audiovisual Commission NAMR National Authority for Mineral Resources NAOG National Authority for Oil and Gas NCCUSL National Commissioners on Uniform State Laws NCS National Commission on Securities OG Official Gazette Pub.L. Public Law R&D Research and Development SME Small and Medium Size Enterprises TNC Transnational Corporation ULLC Uniform Limited Liability Company Act ULPA Uniform Limited Partnership Act UPA Uniform Partnership Act USC United States Code USCA United States Code Annotated iv Table of Exhibits Exhibit 1. Geographical studies in comparison to investment studies ................................. 16 Exhibit 2. The basic strategy-performance model ............................................................... 22 Exhibit 3. Lahti's strategy-performance model .................................................................... 24 Exhibit 4. The interplay between the internal and the external factors of the firm .............. 28 Exhibit 5. List of Motives for direct investment .................................................................. 38 Exhibit 6. Predominant motivation factors and modes of delivery ...................................... 41 Exhibit 7. Hierarchical structure of the different macro-environments of the firm .............. 43 Exhibit 8. A general framework for political risk assessmen ............................................... 48 Exhibit 9. Components of the political environment ........................................................... 49 Exhibit 10. Types of government intervention in foreign direct investment ........................ 54 Exhibit 11. Relations of a political nature in the context of international investment.......... 63 Exhibit 12. Positioning of the present study ........................................................................ 65 Exhibit 13. Theoretical building blocks of the present study ............................................... 66 Exhibit 14. Relevant elements having an impact on the firm's investment decision ............ 67 Exhibit 15. The framework of the study .............................................................................. 69 Exhibit 16. Reform progress in Kazakhstan, compared to CIS and CEEB .......................... 79 Exhibit 17. Problems in the Business Environment ............................................................. 82 Exhibit 18. Sectoral Distribution of gross FDI .................................................................... 85 Exhibit 19. Investmrnt key................................................................................................... 87 Exhibit 20. Foreign Direct Investment in Kazakhstan, 1999-2002 .................................... 117 Exhibit 21. Breakdown of FDI into Kazakhstan by Source Country, 1996-2002 (% of total FDI .......................................................................................................... 118 Exhibit 22. Breakdown of FDI by Industry, 1996-2002 (% of total FDI ........................... 118 Exhibit 23. Selected Minerals Production, 2002 ................................................................ 121 Exhibit 24. Selected Investments in the Non-ferrous Metals Sector, 2003 ........................ 123 Exhibit 25. FDI inflows (net), various CIS countries, 1998-2006 ..................................... 129 Exhibit 26. Sources of FDI in Kazkhstan, 1997-2005 (percentages) ................................. 130 Exhibit 27. Sectoral distribution of FDI stock, 1999-2005 (Percentages) .......................... 131 Exhibit 28. Comparative tax rates in CIS Countries .......................................................... 143 Exhibit 29. Perception of commercial laws ....................................................................... 146 Exhibit 30. Average time spent on regulatory and administrative processes in Kazakhstan ...................................................................................................... 151 Exhibit 31. Summary of Recommendations ...................................................................... 157 v vi FOREWORD I would like to acknowledge the friendship and support of many people, without whom, this dissertation would not have been possible. First and foremost, I am forever indebted to my mentors, Prof. Dr. Li-Choy Chong and Prof. Dr. Klaus Spremann. They have been a constant source of inspiration, support, and encouragement. I would also like to thank many of my classmates, who all were good collegeagues. I would especially like to thank my parents and all of my friends. St.Gallen, October, 2007 Vladimir Sukhoruchenko vii ABSTRACT This paper focuses on the strategy formulation process by exploring how strategies, especially those for foreign direct investments (FDIs), are being formulated, and on what they are based. More specifically, this research analyzes how a company's strategy formulation process may change or may need to be adapted for the specific operating environment of an emerging market. A decision-making process develops over the lifetime of an organization and is thus influenced by the company's operating environment. That is why one can readily differentiate bureaucratic government or state-owned enterprises, which operate in a secure and stable market, from entrepreneurial organizations and young start-ups. The majority of publications concerning FDI describes the investment in developed countries (i.e. USA, Western Europe), while very little is said about the investment determinants in less developed countries or countries in transition. In addition, research into managers' perceptions, country stereotypes and their influence on investment decision is not adequate. This study adds to the existing information by examining a country in transition that is new to foreign investment, from the standpoint of foreign investors' perceptions about that country and its investment climate. The selected country is Kazakhstan, quite a new participant in the rivalry to attract foreign investment, a country offering foreign investors many potential advantages but also with many potential threats. The research attempts to determine factors influencing the position of Kazakhstan in the eyes of foreign investors. This study investigates the investment climate of Kazakhstan as seen by foreign investors, their level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with their investment, and factors influencing their choice of Kazakhstan as an investment location. viii 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Problem presentation As the globalization of the marketplace continues, companies that conduct business only within their national boundaries will find it difficult to survive. One way to cope with this problem is for companies to expand their operations beyond home country frontiers into other countries through foreign direct investment (FDI). FDI plays an important role as a tool in worldwide competition. The World Investment Report names FDI a "primary force" shaping globalization. Along with the globalization of the marketplace, the world’s economy has expanded in recent years. One of the factors influencing this trend is FDI. Currently, FDI is growing even faster than international trade, which has been the major mechanism connecting national economy (World Investment Report). Even countries previously closed to foreign investors, for instance China, have recognized the economic benefits of foreign investment and have opened their borders to foreign capital. Competition to attract FDI involves not only developed countries, but also developing countries. Several factors may contribute to countries which are targeted as a foreign investment destination. Besides "tangible" determinants which can be easily calculated and compared (e.g. size and growth of the country’s market, level of protectionism, etc.) there are other factors which are also considered by potential investors but are not easy to measure. Among these factors the FDI literature lists the image and stereotypes of the host country in the eyes of foreign investors, as well as managers‘ personal perceptions and preferences regarding the host country, as playing an important role in the investment decision making process (Stobaugh 1969, Papadopoulos 1993, Wee, Lim. and Tan 1993, Root 1994). The majority of publications concerning FDI describes the investment in developed countries (i.e. USA, Western Europe), while very little is said about the investment determinants in less developed countries or countries in transition. In addition, research into managers' perceptions, country stereotypes and their influence on investment decision is not adequate. This study adds to the existing information by examining a country in transition 1 that is new to foreign investment, from the standpoint of foreign investors' perceptions about that country and its investment climate. The selected country is Kazakhstan, quite a new participant in the rivalry to attract foreign investment, a country offering foreign investors many potential advantages but also with many potential threats. The research attempts to determine factors influencing the position of Kazakhstan in the eyes of foreign investors. This study investigates the investment climate of Kazakhstan as seen by foreign investors, their level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with their investment, and factors influencing their choice of Kazakhstan as an investment location. This paper thus focuses on the strategy formulation process by exploring how strategies, especially those for foreign direct investments (FDIs), are being formulated, and on what they are based. More specifically, this research analyzes how a company's strategy formulation process may change or may need to be adapted for the specific operating environment of an emerging market. A decision-making process develops over the lifetime of an organization and is thus influenced by the company's operating environment. That is why one can readily differentiate bureaucratic government or state-owned enterprises, which operate in a secure and stable market, from entrepreneurial organizations and young startups. To achieve the latter goal, data from a substantial number of firms, all of which needed to be investigated thoroughly, had to be gathered. Through comparison, reasoning and capturing emerging theories, this empirical data helped to uncover which characteristics of decisionmaking and which organizational structures are best suited to reach the goal of optimal decision making for emerging markets. To obtain meaningful results, it is therefore necessary to limit the analysis to a more clearly defined area of research. At the core of the analysis, then, are foreign direct investment decision-making processes of multinational oil & gas companies in the market of Kazakhstan. However, there is no research which explores the advantages and disadvantages of investment in Kazakhstan. Also limited research is available concerning determinants of investment in Kazakhstan, the perceptions and stereotypes that foreign managers hold about Kazakhstan, and what could be done that would increase the flow of FDI into Kazakhstan. 2 This study explores these areas by examine the experience and perceptions of investors currently operating in Kazakhstan. Investors' views are used to assess the investment climate in Kazakhstan, and, possibly, to suggest ways to improve the image of the country. 1.2 Objective and research questions The study will examine the investment climate in Kazakhstan and major barriers for foreign investors by entry the Kazakhstan's market, and will define strategic problems in the investment policy and prospects for the future. In concluding will be given the recommendations to improvement of investment strategy by foreign investors and to improvement of FDI policy by government to attract foreign investors. Like other leading transition economies, Kazakhstan has adopted a series of instruments to improve the overall investment climate, but many investors are concerned about the grey areas which discourage decision-makers from planning and executing FDI projects. These areas are: • Political instabilities, • malfunctioning of the judiciary, • poor economic and infrastructure conditions, • high energy costs, • imponderability with taxation and • the still unresolved land ownership issue. In their efforts to facilitate matters for foreign companies, successive governments have formulated a series of draft laws. The future success of Kazakhstan's FDI policy will be determined by progress made in the country's macro-systems. These systems need to be improved through appropriate measures. 3 Legal system Socioeconomic system Political system Financial system FDI FDI enhancement enhancement Administrative system Education system Cultural system Starting from the early 1990s, practically all leading large emerging market governments have introduced new macro policies in an effort to make general framework conditions more conductive to foreign investors. They are in line with basic policy recommendations recently made by the World Bank following a survey of 3600 entrepreneurs in 69 countries. The Bank has established a list of basic government tasks for attracting FDI: • Building a solid legal foundation, • Maintaining macroeconomic stability, • Investing in basic social services and infrastructure, • Protecting the socially weak and the environment (World Bank, 1997). Conceptual framework of the research can be described as follows: Motive of investment Barriers for foreign investment Investment Process (Strategic Problems of FDI) Prospects for the Future Thus, this study should answer six research questions: 4 Recommendat ion: MNC & Govern. • Why do foreign investors invest into Kazakhstan? (Why not?) • How do foreign investors invest into Kazakhstan? • How successful are foreign multinational Oil & Gas companies in Kazakhstan and why? • What is the Prospects of FDI policy in Kazakhstan for the Future? • What can be done to improve the investment strategy of foreign investors in Kazakhstan? • What can be done to improve the FDI Policy for attraction of FDI? 1.3 Research Methodology As several researchers have mentioned, there are considerable methodological problems involved in any investigation of variables related to strategic FDI decisions and firm performance (Agren 1990). Firstly, the variables are both difficult to define and difficult to measure. Secondly, information of this type is often sensitive, and thus difficult to collect. Thirdly, such information is often hard to interpret. 1.3.1 Research Design The research design of the study can be described as follows: 5 Defining the motive and barriers for foreign investors in Kazakhstan (Surveymethod, interview) Comparative study on barriers for foreign investors by the entry the markets of CIScountries (Case study analysis) Investment process: Strategic Problems of FDI in Kazakhstan (Archival method, interview) Investment climate: Prospects for the future of FDI into Kazakhstan (Archival method) Recommendati ons to improvement of FDI policy (Data analysis) The methods chosen for research will be described in the next part. 1.3.2 Data collection methods Archival analysis, mail survey with follow-up interviews were chosen as the data collection method for this research. 1.3.2.1 Interviewing. The following discussion describes the interview process in some depth, as it was the main method of data gathering. The quality of the overall results depends on the proper planning, execution and analysis of the interviews with managers of sample firms. 6 For interviewing individuals, there are two main types of interviews in social research, structured and unstructured ones (Fontana / Frey 1994: 363ff.). The latter can also be called 'focused' interviews which convey the meaning that the interviewer focuses on some research questions but does not prepare any specific questions in advance (May 1997: 109ff). Focused interviews were used as the main method of data gathering for the following reasons. Firstly, focused interviews, in contrast to structured ones, are the preferred data gathering method in qualitative research. With their open-ended character, they allow, "to challenge the preconceptions of the researcher, as well as enable the interview to answer questions within their own frame of reference" (May 1997: 112). Secondly, this type of interview also allows the researcher to actively consider the concerns and frames of reference of the interviewees (Bryman 1988: 47). The unit of analysis is the firm and the decision-making process of the whole organization needs to be studied. However, it is possible that representatives of the same company may have different perspectives about a specific topic. These differences can be influenced by a variety of reasons, of which the hierarchical layers of their own organizational unit (headquarters, regional headquarters or local subsidiaries) is of particular importance. Another important factor that could result in managers having different opinions may be differences in job functions (managers or project team members). Therefore, the method of doing interviews must be flexible enough to ask the right question to the right people. Drawing up a special questionnaire for each subgroup of interviewees does not seem to be helpful, because the goal is not to compare, say, the views of regional headquarters managers across different organizations, but to understand the 'whys' and 'hows' of decision making in each organization separately. On the other hand, there are some bits of information that need to be gathered from all companies and some questions need to be raised with every interviewee. These questions, called 'structural questions' by Spradley (1979: 120), have changed - more precisely mostly expanded - over time when the model-building was progressing. Therefore, these general guidelines that aid the interviews have changed as well. To sum up, the method of focused interviews enabled the researcher to follow his research goals without restricting the interviewees in their freedom to talk about the topic in the way 7 they thought fit. "Thus flexibility and the discovery of meaning, rather than standardization, or a concern to compare through constraining replies by a set interview schedule, characterize this method", which is exactly what is needed for thorough grounded theory research (May 1997: 113; sic, italics in original). When writing about interviewing, it is necessary to mention that great emphasis should be placed on how the interview is constructed, which questions are raised, how trust should be build up, how well the researcher needs to be prepared, and 80 on. The focus of this research does not allow discussion of these important topics at great length, but it should be pointed out that these methods and techniques were all taken into account throughout the field research. To preserve as much data as possible, all interviews will be recorded on tape whenever feasible. Soon after the interviews, these tape recordings will be transcribed word-by-word for further analysis later on. When tape recordings will be not possible, special attention will be given to a quick write-up of the field notes. 1.3.2.2 Archival Analysis In an archival analysis, sources of data are various types of documentation, public records, or other units of analysis. Dane (1990) defines archival research as any research that deals with public records as unit of analysis. Content analysis as one form of archival analysis, for instance, proceeds systematically and makes inferences from theory (Dane, 1990). What distinguishes archival analysis from other research methods is that information is available through archival analysis before one’s own research (May, 1997). Through an archival analysis in the form of a formal theoretical inquiry, new knowledge based on extant knowledge can be created by means of combining, extending, analyzing, and integrating existing research areas, namely an interdisciplinary approach, allows one to gain new insights. A further advantage is that this research method is economical regarding research resources. This is especially true where access to the research object is costly due to geographical or social barriers or non-reactive research. 8 Disadvantages of archival analysis include the potential considerable age of data and the differences in the unit of analysis of previous and one‘s own research. The dependence on the quality of data from previous research is a further problem, the reliability and validity of data collected by others being difficult to determine (Dane, 1990). In conclusion, pure theoretical analysis is important to complement other research methods, but it is certainly not sufficient on its own. 1.3.2.3 Mail Survey. A mail survey with follow-up interviews was chosen as the data collection method. The main advantages of mail questionnaires as a data collection method are, firstly, their wide scope: a great deal of information can be obtained from a large sample, and secondly, it is economical in comparison with other data collection methods. However, mail questionnaire research has a significant disadvantage in its ability to provide in-depth information. Another main drawback of mail surveys is often the relatively low response rate. Geringer (1989) has stated that the average response rate seems to have been about 30 percent, but response rates as low as 5 percent have also been reported. It seems that in those studies made in the Nordic countries, response rates have usually been clearly higher. A survey is considered an appropriate research methodology when the research question is of a "who/what/where/how many/how much" nature. Furthermore, a survey is applicable when no control over behavioral events is examined (Yin, 1989). A survey is also suitable when data across several time periods are to be collected (Snow, 1994). 1.3.3 Data Analysis. "Analysis during data collection lets the fieldworker cycle back and forth between thinking about the existing data and generating strategies for collecting new - often better quality data; it can be a healthy corrective for built-in blind spots; and it makes analysis an ongoing, lively enterprise that is linked to the energizing effects of fieldwork" (Miles / Huberman 1994: 49). Following this advice, data analysis accompanies the field research phase and will be done partly in parallel to it. This parallel data analysis phase helps in modifying the 9 research questions during the interview process based on the results of previous findings. The model could thus emerge from the data, gaining shape and precision with each interview. 10 2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 2.1 Foreign direct investment as a strategic decision of the firm The first research task of the study aims to uncover a model that recognises both the relevant internal and external factors having an impact on the investment decisions of TNCs. The discussion will be started with a brief analysis of the FDI theories in order to get a clear picture of the concept of direct investment and the major studies on FDI. At this stage, the focus is on international business literature. Then, the firm's perspective will be adopted and FDI will be discussed as a strategic decision of the TNC. Thus, the discussion will be extended to the field of strategic management, which has explicitly studied the firm's strategies and performance. The fields of international business and strategic management have common ground, which is visible especially in the context of FDI. Similarly, field of the geography of enterprise and strategic management have a lot of common as they have been developed in close interaction. Finally, the literature review culminates in the adoption of a model that recognises the relevant general factors having an impact on the firm's investment decision. 2.1.1 Major foreign direct investment theories FDI refers to the transfer of the capital, managerial and technical assets of a firm from the home country to the host country. It is a form of international finance, together with lending and portfolio investments, but different from lending because it entails ownership, and different from portfolio investment because it entails control of financed activities over management and profits. Often portfolio investment is made for the sake of investment income, while FDI is made in order to control the foreign enterprise in the host country. Portfolio investments are excluded from the present analysis. There is no single theory on FDI, but various approaches from different disciplines, such as economics, international business, and organisation and management, explaining different aspects of the phenomenon. Basically, three levels of analysis have been distinguished (eg Cantwell 1991, 17; see also Calvet 1981 for a summary of early FDI theories): 11 macroeconomic, mesoeconomic and microeconomic levels. The macroeconomic theories based on traditional trade and location theories, consider the national and international trend of FDI. The mesoeconomic theories based largely on industrial organisation economics, study FDI on the industry level and emphasise the competitive economic environment. Finally, the microeconomic theories are based on the theory of the firm and focus on the competitive advantage of the firm. In addition to these three levels, Luostarinen has identified a fourth level of analysis, the sub-micro level (later milli-micro level), which refers to investment decision-making processes in the investing companies. In the following, the major avenues for the studies of FDI are overviewed. The theories are briefly studied starting from the macro-level and continuing towards the micro-level. This order reflects also the shift of focus of international business discipline, since the 1970s, from the international economy level to the firm level and even inside the firm, as in the case of milli-micro level of analysis. Actually, the shift of focus has not been straightforward, and it has aimed not only at progression into a more detailed level of analysis, but to more complete explanations (cf. Bartlett & Ghoshal 1991,6). Traditional international trade theories have been extended to FDI with regard to the international movement of factors of production. Examples include such extensions of the international trade theory, as factor endowment theory that contains factor mobility (eg Helpman 1984) and specific factor models (eg Markusen & Venables 1998), which both are representatives of the new trade theory. They are applicable in the context of FDI, as they allow imperfect competition and product differentiation. Also traditional location theory (eg Weber 1909) can be discussed in the context of FDI because it understands the least-cost location of production as the optimal location of the firm. According to Hanink (1994, 212), traditional location theory suggests that there is potential for FDI if the low-cost factor of production is located in a different country than the market. This refers to core-periphery investment, which has been historically typical as the foreign resources of raw materials formed the major motivation of FDI. However, in the case of an imperfect market, where the market share is put before profit maximisation, FDI is likely to take place in an intra-core context. (Hanink 1994,212) Macro-economic investment theories include also Dunning's (1993) developmental model of international investment, which relates the determinants of outward and inward investments to the developmental phase of the country. According to the model, outward investment 12 exceeds the inward investment as the economy develops. The gradual shift from negative net investment to positive, depends on a country's factor endowments, politico-economic system and its interdependencies with the world economy. Investments develop through five phases. In the first phase, inward and outward investments of the developing country are at a low level. In the second phase, market growth and enhanced human capital raise the inward investment while the outward investment still stays at a low level. In the third phase, both inward and outward investments have a significant role in the economy, which has reached an intermediate level of industrialisation. In the fourth phase, the outward investment exceeds the inward investment because the domestic firms both compensate the location disadvantages of the home country by engaging in outward investment, and complement the location advantages offered by the immobile factors of the host countries. Finally, in the fifth phase, outward and inward investments become balanced and are both at a high level. (Dunning 1993) In FDI literature, the increasing role of TNCs has been rather difficult to fit into a national level frame. Thus, many theories have been developed from the base that FDI is not a result of the relative comparative advantage of a country but an implication of the competitive advantage of the firm. Industrial organisation economics is an application of microeconomics, which has broken the classical assumption of perfectly competitive markets, and is interested in FDI as the TNCs way to utilise firm-specific advantages and survive in oligopolistic competition. A representative of industrial organisation economics is Hymer's study (1976), according to which TNC has to earn a higher profit abroad than on the home market because of the greater risk involved and the additional costs caused by operating at a distance. Thus, the competitive advantage of TNC is both transferable over borders and difficult to acquire by local firms. Although the industrial organisation economics emphasises the firm-specific advantages and the strategies a firm can adopt for increasing and maintaining its market power, it also reminds that industries utilise a certain proportion of factors and thus, fit best to a country that offers the particular factor. However, industrial organisation economics focuses on strategic matters and firm-specific advantages rather than country factors. Similar kinds of views to Hymer (1976) are shared in many other theories, such as the transaction cost theory, product life cycle theory, and eclectic theory. Among them, the transaction cost theory developed by Williamson (1975), with its roots in Coase (1937), argues that trade is beneficial for firms as they can avoid costs arising from the unfamiliarity 13 of the markets. However, if the transaction costs of exchange are lower within the hierarchies of the TNC, the market will be internalised. Thus, FDI is not just a capital inducement but an international extension of managerial control over a subsidiary abroad. Vernon (1966, 1979) introduced the product life cycle theory already in the mid-1960s, but developed it later to an explicitly oligopolistic interpretation. The theory explains the geographical process of locating the manufacturing units in the four general stages of maturity. In the first stage of the life cycle, new products are introduced by a firm that holds technological leadership in a location where it can enjoy agglomeration economies. Overseas demand is served by export. In the second stage, the firm starts to establish production facilities abroad as soon as it finds an opportunity to reduce costs by doing so, or its market position is threatened. The first overseas production tends to be set up in the highincome market. In the third stage, the newly established plant serves the local market in the host country and displaces exports from the home country. Consequently, home country based firms export directly to third countries. Finally, in the fourth stage, the newly established plant in the host country expands its exports also to third-country markets. When the innovative lead is lost and the product becomes mature, the production facilities will be relocated to low-cost locations from where the products are exported to the home country as well. (Vernon 1979,265-267) Finally, the eclectic theory is Dunning's attempt to combine various theories on FDI (eg Dunning 1993). Eclectic theory is based on the idea that, compared to local competitors, foreign firm does not have as good information of the local business environment. Thus, TNC will engage in international production only if a set of particular advantages are present, namely ownership advantage, internalisation advantage and locational advantage. The ownership advantage determines which firms will supply a particular foreign market. The ownership advantages include all the specific, often intangible, assets, which a firm can either create (eg knowledge, organisational skills) or purchase (eg patents, brand names), and which its competitors do not posses. The internalisation advantage explains why firms will internalise transactions within their hierarchies rather than allow transactions to be made within the market. The more ownership-specific advantages a firm possesses relative to competitors, the greater the incentive to internalise their use. Finally, the location advantage explains whether a firm will supply foreign markets by exports or through local production. The location advantage (eg spatial distribution of inputs) makes it profitable for 14 a firm to exploit its assets overseas. Otherwise, it would serve a foreign market through exports from a home country base. Microeconomic theories of FDI include also the internationalisation theory of the firm. Luostarinen's (1979) model explains the internationalisation process of the firm through the starting, development, growth, and mature stages. During these stages, operational methods of the TNCs are manifested by the trade in goods taking place in the earlier phase of economic interaction compared to international investment. The explanation goes that exports prepare the way for investment by establishing business contacts and sources of information and creating a special knowledge of the market. Once established, direct investment allows firms to gain a much better understanding of foreign markets, thus also facilitating further exports of the parent firm. (Luostarinen and Welch 1997) FDI can also be seen as a result of the growth of the firm. Luostarinen's study (1979) has many similarities with Hakanson's (1979) five-stage model of the geographical pattern of a corporate structure that explains how a firm expands from the home country to overseas and grows from a single operation plant to TNC. A firm grows gradually by employing new international operations, starting from a sales office and ending in a subsidiary or acquisition abroad. According to the model, the mode of operation is influenced by changes in the company's environment and the company will choose the FDI mode only after it has achieved a certain level of trade. In addition to traditional investment theories, economic geography has attracted special attention to intra-national patterns of FDI. The core-periphery framework that interprets the spatial organisation of the world economy through a powerful core, weak periphery, and transitional semi-periphery, is adaptable at any geographical scale. With reference to the intra-national context, an urbanised capital region usually forms the core of the state and is surrounded by rural areas, or periphery. Many countries have several regional cores. Traditional industrial location theories explain the regional distribution of FDI in terms of transport costs, wages and infrastructure, while more recent theories have emphasised such issues as the role of agglomeration with demand and supply linkages (eg Krugman 1991). The FDI can be seen as a catalyst for local development as TNCs may speed up growth rates in the host countries by applying their experience to build and operate factories. (Hayter 1997, 390) Thus, governments are eager to intervene in the locational decisions of the 15 TNCs. Altogether, it is important to put an emphasis both on the role of locational conditions and the role of the host government that may aim to fill the gap between the real locational attractiveness of the country and the degree of expectations by the TNC for a desirable investment location. As the economic geography searches frameworks applicable on various spatial scales, it is characteristic of the studies to penetrate the above-mentioned levels of analysis. Thus, economic geography may study FDI through various spatial scales that may include global, international, regional, national, local, industry, firm, and even individual levels, as shown in Exhibit 1. In the case of the geography of enterprise, the firm is the central focus and level of analysis but not isolated from the other levels that affect the firm. As mentioned earlier, the present study highlights the importance of both firm-specific and country-specific factors thus focusing mainly on the national and the firm levels of analysis. This is essential because it is impossible to understand the nature of macro-level FDI inflows from one country to another without analysing the micro-level FDI decisions by the investing firms. In addition, the present study will put emphasis on meso-economic level by recognising the location of the firms within the regional structure of the host economy. Exhibit 1. Geographical studies in comparison to investment studies Exhibit 1 illustrates the four traditional levels of investment studies according to Cantwell (1991). Basically, the levels of business studies include at least individual, management, functional, firm, inter-organisational, industry, and economy levels. 16 2.1.2 Types of investment Taking a more practical view of FDI, it is possible to distinguish various kinds of investment types based on such issues as the target market, strategic motives, internal structure, industry, way of growth, ownership, and others. The types are partly overlapping reflecting the multidimensional nature of the investment decision. In the following, the types will be overviewed. The basic division of direct investment into two is made according to the final market for the produced item or service. The local market-oriented investment refers to the case in which the output of the production site in the host country is directed to fulfil the demand in the host country. Consequently, the international market-oriented investment refers to the case in which the host country is used as an export platform and the final product is directed at the international market. The latter is also called export-oriented investment. It is obvious that a firm makes its investment decision to meet the general motives of corporate strategy, especially economic performance. Investment literature has studied TNC motivations to invest abroad widely from different viewpoints: different firms, different industries, different host countries, and different periods. As a result, great numbers of various motives has been listed. Nevertheless, investment literature (eg Behrman 1981; Buckley 1988; Dunning 1993, 1998) has been able to define the five main types of direct investment in terms of strategic motives, although investment is usually not engaged due to the one single specific motive, but a combination of various motives (Eiteman et al. 1992,436). 1. Resource seeking investment is based on traditional locational advantages, such as costs of inputs, and transaction costs. This type of investment usually extracts raw materials for export or for further processing and sale in the host country. Typical representatives of this kind of investment are the extractive industries. 2. Market seeking investment is based on strategic locational advantages in order to increase a company's market power. The aim is to find better opportunities to enter and expand new markets either by satisfying local demand or by exporting to third markets. Investment is usually motivated by such reasons as market size, growth prospects of the market, market share, or competitive situation. This type of investment is nowadays the most common type of investment. In it, 17 engagement with the host market is the greatest. A typical example is foodstuffs, which cannot be exported but have to be produced on the spot. 3. Production efficiency seeking investment aims to find production factors that are cheap relative to their productivity. Investment may be motivated by labour cost advantages, low raw-material costs, low transportation costs, low energy costs, or the availability of a skilled labour force. It refers often to off-shore production, which uses the special economic zones of the host countries. Typical representatives are thus the sourcing industries. 4. Knowledge seeking investment (strategic asset seeking investment) aims to gain access to technology or managerial expertise in the host country. It has specific locational needs (eg technical knowledge, learning experiences, management expertise, organisational competence) and is mainly concentrated in advanced industrial economies. The increase of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) emphasise the increasing role of knowledge seeking investment. (Dunning 1998, 50) 5. Political safety seeking investment aims to minimise expropriation risks and is undertaken either in the form of investment in countries unlikely to interfere with TNC operations, or in the form of divestment from politically unsafe countries. (Behrman 1981; Buckley 1988; Dunning 1993,1998, Eiteman et al. 1992,436) Different types of investments can also be classified according to the investor's internal structure. This classification distinguishes between horizontal, vertical, conglomerate and concentric investment. In horizontal investment, which is the most common type of investment, a company duplicates the whole production process, except the headquarter activities, in its subsidiary locating in the host country. Through the local production, the investor is able to penetrate the local market and increase its reputation with customers as products can be modified for the special requirements of a particular market. Differently, the vertical type of investment refers to the establishment of a subsidiary in the host country to serve at different stages of the value-added chain of the investor, notably the next stage forward or backward in production and sales. (Larimo 1993,47) Concentric investment, in its turn, involves foreign units serving the same customers as the investing company through different production methods and research and development (R&D). It may also involve foreign units serving different customers through the same production methods and R&D. (Larimo 1993, 47-48) Concentric investments may also be called horizontal diversification. This is still different from the conglomerate investment, 18 which occurs when a company manufactures an internationally diversified range of products so that the foreign unit differs from the investing firm in terms of all major characteristics, including production, technology, customers and distribution channels. (Larimo 1993, 48) Due to the differences, conglomerate investment usually takes place by acquisition. In the case of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) the above-mentioned terms get a slightly different content. In addition, it is possible to divide investment simply into related and unrelated types of investments. Related types of investments include horizontal and vertical types, which are related to the investor's industry or customers, while unrelated types include conglomerate and concentric types of investments, which are driven by a firm's risk dispersion. Basically, unrelated types of investment cause more risk for the investor as the field of industry or target market are unfamiliar for it (Larimo 1993, 48). Therefore, firms engaged in related types of investment more often than unrelated types (ibid.). Moreover, they tend to engage in unrelated investment in a familiar market and remain in related investment in a more distant and unfamiliar market (Borsos-Torstila 1999, 57). Investment can be seen either as an internal or external process depending on the firm's way of growth. Internal growth, or greenfield investment, means investment in a new plant and equipment, which builds up knowledge and capability inside the firm, while external investment means the acquisition of existing plant and equipment. (Luostarinen & Welch 1997,164) The greenfield strategy is applicable if the product or the production process demands unique technology, which forms the company's competitive edge and thus, cannot be endangered by technology transfer to local firms in the host country. The greenfield strategy is also applicable if the host government's incentives are valid in a particular geographical area where suitable partners are not available. Consequently, a particular location may possess some important production factors, which results in a TNC to adapt the greenfield strategy if there are no suitable partners, (ibid., 166) Greenfield investment is a dominating way of FDI in developing countries (UNCTAD 2004, xvii). Buying an existing company in the host economy, or cross-border M&A, is the most rapid way to enter a new market. It may solve the difficulties of hiring local personnel and penetrating local distribution channels, and it brings a readily-built market share and customer group with it. Based on these facts, the time needed to pay back the investment is relatively short. However, acquisitions usually face serious problems in integrating two previously separate organisations together. (Root 1994, 164-166; Luostarinen & Welch 19 1997, 164-165) M&A is the most common type of FDI in the developed countries (UNCTAD 2004, xvii). With regard to ownership, a TNC may set a wholly-owned subsidiary or a joint venture. The advantages of a wholly-owned subsidiary include the total control of operations, decisionmaking, profits, management and production decisions, and the security over the technological assets and know-how. The constraints are mainly related to the capital requirements and the shortage of management personnel with international experience. Success in a distant market without a local partner may also be difficult due to the different cultural backgrounds, different corporate or industry cultures, and different national or ethnic cultures, not to mention different legal, economic and political aspects. (ElKahal 2001, 237) In the form of a joint venture, the investor has access to local partners' specialised skills, knowledge of a local market, and government contacts. Thus, a joint venture with a wellconnected local partner is often considered as the best way of investment. In many cases, however, the contribution of partners have been disproportionate, as the local partner has provided only labour and local facilities while the investor has to provide capital, training, technology, equipment, and know-how, (ibid., 227-231) A joint venture can be set with one or more local partners. Sometimes, the partner or one of the partners is from the home country or a third country. If at least one of the partners is a government-owned firm, the joint venture is called a mixed venture. A TNC may set a majority joint/mixed venture, a 5050 joint/mixed venture, or a minority joint/mixed venture (Luostarinen &Welch 1997, 156158). The entry mode is not always possible to decide according to the TNC's own will, but may be regulated by the host country. Investment can be classified by its function as a direct investment production operation (DIPO), which includes assembling and manufacturing subsidiaries, or a direct investment marketing operation (DIMO), which includes sales promotion subsidiaries, warehousing units, service units, and sales subsidiaries (Luostarinen 1979, 105-112). Again, the functions are overlapping and can be utilised separately but also together. In addition to the above-mentioned classifications, the size and industry of the investing firm, as well as its earlier experience in internationalisation are factors which can be used to make a difference between FDI situations. Among them, the size of the firm is usually measured by the turnover and number of employees. According to Harvard criteria, a 20 multinational enterprise (MNE) is a firm that has a turnover of more than USD 200 million and at least six production units abroad (cf.Vaupel & Curhan 1969, 3), while the smaller firms can be classified as SMEs. These two groups differ in their investment behaviour in a sense that MNEs have much larger resources than SMEs to fulfil their strategies in the host economy (Larimo 1993, 32). Similarly, firms having broad earlier international experience have better starting points to operate in the host economy than firms without such experience (ibid.). Finally, FDI experiences may be different between firms representing different industries. 2.1.3 Strategic management view on the investor The geography of enterprise and strategic management traditions have different approaches to the firm, but they are by no means contradictory to each other. The geography of enterprise approach asks where the firm should exist in order to perform better than the other firms, while the strategic management literature asks how and why some firms are able to perform better than other firms. As mentioned earlier, the geography of enterprise literature has recently put much effort in conceptualisation of the firm. This has been seen necessary, because the concept of the firm has been understood as rather confusing, as shown by Machlup (1967) who has recognised 21 different definitions of the firm. The difference between the various concepts is how they understand the firm, the environment, and the relation between the firm and the environment. A rather established definition of the firm among geographers has been the one by Cowling and Sugden (1987, 62), who define the firm as a "means of co-ordinating production from one centre of strategic decision-making". This definition has an implicit idea on the firm as a network and as a homogenous decision-making unit, characteristics widely discussed in economic geography. Moreover, Cowling and Sugden emphasise the firm's ability to co-ordinate the system by internalising transactions within the firm. Thus, they emphasise the role of strategic decision-making over the production system including not only the firms themselves, but also the relationship between the firms, their suppliers and customers, and the host governments. In strategic management literature, in its turn, a firm is defined "as a purposive organisation whose behaviour is directed toward identifiable end purposes or objectives", and which "seeks its objectives through...conversion of its resources into goods and/or services and 21 then obtaining a return on these by selling them to customers". (Ansoff 1987, 23, 48; emphasis by Ansoff) Moreover, these purposes are economic in their nature. In brief, strategic management approach focuses on defining a firm's abilities to perform, while the geography of enterprise approach continues the definition by adding the spatial perspective that highlights the characteristics of the modern TNC. In the geography of enterprise approach, 1) a TNC is able to extend its control over legally independent firms, 2) a TNC is a network-type organisation consisting of collaborative relationships, 3) a TNC is able to move operations betweens various geographical scales, 4) a TNC is able to take advantage of geographical differences, 5) expansion of TNC is directed by strategic decisions based on the availability of resources for investment purposes, 6) strategic decision-making is a centralised action, which allocates resources, and 7) production may refer to service production as well as to manufacturing. (Cowling & Sudgen 1987,60; Hayter 1997; Dicken 1998,177; Oinas 1998, 34-45; Yeung 2000) The two definitions of the firm by strategic management and the geography of enterprise approaches complement each other. This compatibility allows turning the discussion to the concept of FDI. In the context of the FDI, the geography of enterprise literature recognises the corporate strategies behind locational decisions. In addition, this tradition understands FDI as a TNC - a host government bargaining process, which is explained by strategy and the power of the firm. This means that the decision to go abroad is strategic. Thus, a further look at the strategic management approach is needed in order to understand the corporate behaviour behind the investment decisions. Strategy is defined "as the determination of the basic long-term goals and objectives of an enterprise, and the adoption of courses of action and the allocation of resources necessary for carrying out these goals" (Chandler 1962,15-16). Consequently, strategic management is "the process through which strategies are chosen and implemented" (Barney 1991, 27-28). Also Hofer and Schendel (1978, 4) put it similarly: strategy means matching between the organisation's resources with its environment in order to accomplish its purposes. As a result, strategic management models, such as strategy-performance models, argue that the firm aims to gain economic performance through the set of scope and the resource deployment decisions, as shown in Exhibit 2. Exhibit 2. The basic strategy-performance model 22 The aim of the strategy is to combine the strengths of the firm with the opportunities of the environment. As a result, the firm gains economic performance. The aim is to avoid the situation where the weaknesses of the firm are met with the threats of the environment. If the firm succeeds to combine the strengths of the firm with the opportunities of the environment, only the simultaneous change in both the environment and the firm can move the firm towards the worst alternative. Accordingly, with the help of its strengths, the firm may hinder the threat of the environment. However, if there are weaknesses in the firm, it is not able to fully exploit its environment. (Lahti 198,24-29) By definition, risk means uncertainty in achieving the firm's goals (Atkinson 2004). Risk can arise from the strategy, the environment, or the operation. Strategic risk refers to the concern that major strategic alternatives may be ill-advised given the firm's internal and external circumstances. The risk arises if the firm's environment is misread or an inappropriate strategy has been developed to deal with that environment. Environment risk arises from the firm's external environment and the firm cannot directly have an influence on it. Firms can, however, manage the environmental risk by scanning continuously each of the changeable environment elements, identifying the risks, and acting on the risks in an appropriate and timely manner. Finally, operational risk is related to the firm's ability to achieve its objectives and the potential failure to operate according to objectives. The basic strategy-performance model is easily adaptable to the case of direct investment decisions, which are the firm's decision on the geographical scope. As such, the investment decision is one of the major decisions of the firm, which is made once and not changed for 23 several years. It is a part of corporate level strategy, which defines what set of businesses a firm should be in. Thus, it has to be made in a consistent way with the organisation's strategies. Based on Ansoff (1965), Hofer and Schendel (1978,25) present the four elements of any organisation's strategy: 1. scope of operations, the organisation's present and planned interactions with its environment 2. resource deployment, the level and patterns of the organisation's resource and skill deployment, which helps it achieve its goals 3. synergy, the joint effects of resource deployment and scope decisions 4. competitive advantage, an organisation's unique position vis-a-vis competitors through its resource deployment and scope decisions In Hofer and Schendel's definition, resource deployment used to be a new element, which had not been included in strategy elements by earlier authors (eg Ansoff 1965), and they emphasised it even more than the scope of operations (Hofer & Schendel 1978, 25). As their definition refers to managers' tools for coping with external and internal changes, it has many similar characteristics to the decision on the internationalisation of the firm, including FDI. 2.1.4 Adapting the strategy-performance model for investment studies The strategy-performance model is an attempt to recognise all the significant factors, which help the firm to achieve economic performance. It has been gradually developed from the basis of Hofer and Schendel (1978) by Lahti (1983,1985, 1987). Theoretically, the model is part of the Ansoffian strategic management research tradition with a recognisable chain of evidence. Lahti has used the basic strategy-performance model shown earlier, which he has deepened through Hofer and Schendel's strategy elements (scope of operations, resource deployment, synergy, and competitive advantage) and finally explained the relations between the elements explicitly. In addition, Lahti has linked the strategic view to the operative view (from the definition of the potential and the exploitation of the potential to the performance), as illustrated in Exhibit 3. Exhibit 3. Lahti's strategy-performance model 24 Source: Lahti 1987, 49. The model explains the performance of the firm through three dynamic stages. The first stage refers to the firm's strategic decision on how to fit its resources to the scope of the operation. This stage is called performance potential, because the strategic decision creates future potential for the firm. Combining resources and scope in the best possible way, results in synergy. This means that the combination creates more potential than the sum of the elements. (Lahti 1983,30-33) The second stage of the model is called performance realisation and it refers to the firm's capacity to implement selected potential. Potential is utilised by interacting with the market through marketing and serving the market through logistics. The potential realisation stage results in a competitive advantage over competitors. Competitive advantage is thus based on those resources by which a firm can compete more effectively in the specific environment than its competitors. It may be based on the same resources as synergy, but added to the component of competition. Finally, the third stage, performance achieved, refers to performance, that is the result of the strategy process. Lahti (ibid.) highlights the economic perspective and as such, excludes other possible perspectives like the learning perspective, for example. 25 Lahti's strategy-performance model has proved its validity as it has been tested in various contexts. In the following, the content of each strategy-performance model element is briefly overviewed, and the adaptability of the model for the investment studies is discussed. Scope of market operations. The first element of the strategy-performance model, the scope of operations, is defined broadly by Hofer and Schendel (1978, 26): for some companies, it means product or market segments, while the other companies may identify it in terms of geography, technology, or distribution channels. Lahti (1987) explains that the scope of operations means the firm's choice over the customers, the products and the markets. Through this decision the firm selects its external environment. For example, by choosing a target market, the firm also chooses its competitive environment. Lahti (1987, 50) defines the firm's environment as composed offerees and institutions that can have an impact on the firm and the market, but which the firm cannot directly influence. Hofer and Schendel (1978, 47) and Lahti (1987, 50) divide the environment into the firm's general macro-environment and the specific competitive environment. Lahti (ibid.) divides the general macro-environment further into natural, demographic, cultural, political, economic, and technological environments with reference to Kotler (1980, 96-128). All the above-mentioned definitions of the environment probably have their roots in traditional Andrews (1971) environmental model that has been widely recognised in the field of strategic management. Andrews' model defines the relevant environment to consist of economy, politics, society, industry, technology, and ecology. The present study takes Kotler's (1980, 96-128) division of the environment into six parts as given because more or less the same division is used in other models that are built explicitly to analyse changes of the environment, such as the PEST analysis, the STEEP tool, or the environmental scanning. PEST analysis studies the changes in the firm's macro-environment in terms of political (P), economic (E), socio-cultural (S), and technological (T) forces. Later, the analysis has been added by legal (L), ecological (E) and competitive (C) forces and thus, may be called LE PEST С analysis. Accordingly, STEEP is a tool of strategic management that summarises the macro-environment factors that can affect the firm, namely social (S), technological (T), economic (E), environment (E), and political (P) trends. The five can be traced back to Kotler's (1980) six environments if ecological aspects are incorporated in the natural environment and social aspects divided into demographic and cultural environments. The same is true with the environmental scanning, which is a 26 systematic futures methodology that focuses on five knowledge areas of economics, technology, politics, ecology, and socio-cultural factors (eg Lang 2003). Strategic fit, which reflects the alignment between the firm's internal potential and its external opportunities, allows a firm to compare and choose among attractive investment destinations. However, the characteristics of the environment are not interesting for the firm as such, but it is interested in the best possible match for the firm's resources. This is what the geography of enterprise approach argues while explaining location as the relative optimal location. Location is optimal in relation to the firm's strategies. In this context, geographers (Nishioka & Krumme 1973, 202-204) have developed the concepts of location conditions and location factors, which give an additional explanation. Location conditions refer to the differences between locations. These differences are the same for all companies. Differently, location factors refer to the interpretation of the location conditions from the perspective of a single firm and its purposes. Thus, the firm perceives the location conditions of the host country as a more specific set of location factors. Different strategies and resource deployments of different TNCs explain why the firms may value the same environment differently. In practice, a single location condition can be interpreted in various ways depending on the firm's strategy. For example, such a location condition as access to market may refer to advantages resulting from transportation costs, or advantages resulting from close contact (eg customer services), or advantages in the selling price or quantity resulting from the size of the market. Furthermore, the same location condition may be a desirable, undesirable, or inconsequential location factor for a TNC. For example, the host country's environmental policy reform may be desirable for an investor transferring new environmental technologies to the host country, undesirable for an investor using contaminant technologies, and inconsequential for an investor operating in a not environmentally sensitive field. The analysis, based only on location conditions of the host country, does not explain the effective location factors relevant to a TNC, and vice versa, the analysis of location factors only, probably gives an incomplete picture of the region (Nishioka & Krumme 1973, 202204). As explained by Harvey (1997, 98-100), location conditions in a particular country may be listed by reasoning, but location factors have to be identified by numerous questionnaire surveys. However, the surveys conducted in international business, for example, have used various different scales and contexts. Therefore, conflicting results have 27 emerged. In addition, location factors may be subjective and cannot be generalised. However, by adopting the strategy-performance model to investment studies, the firm's external environment can be included in the analysis in order to explain how the countryspecific factors influence the firm's scope of market operations, resources, marketing and logistics, and finally the performance, as illustrated in Exhibit 4. Exhibit 4. The interplay between the internal and the external factors of the firm Resource deployment. In order to extend its scope of market operations, the firm has to invest. By investment, the firm actually changes some of its resources. In this point, the analysis has to be turned inside the firm, as the decision to invest has to be based on knowledge of the firm's patterns of resource deployments (Hofer & Schendel 1978, 23-25). However, the investment decision may also create a need for additional resources that has to be achieved in interaction with the firm's environment, as explained earlier. Thus, the achievement of additional resources calls for knowledge of the environment, as well. Early authors (eg Ansoff 1987, 23) have classified the resources of the firm into three categories of physical, monetary and human resources. Hofer & Schendel (1978, 145) have developed more sophisticated classifications by adding organisational resources and 28 technology. There is no clear consensus on the classification, and there are continuously new emphasises for the purposes of new types of organisations, such as new ventures. The resources, which the firms possess and can use in order to achieve their objectives, are defined according to Hofer and Schendel (1978, 145) to consist of: 1. physical resources (eg raw materials, buildings, machines) 2. human resources (eg staff number, education level, language skills, professional skills) 3. technological capabilities (eg systems of production, information and telecommunications) 4. financial resources (eg cash flow, equity capital, short and long-term liabilities, return on capital, liquidity, solidity) 5. organisational resources (eg organisational structure and capacity, R&D degree, innovativeness, values) The resources of the firm are not just given, but they are dynamic: the firm has to continuously upgrade and develop them, or as Ansoff (1987, 23) puts it: "All three [physical, monetary and human resources] are used up in the conversion process: plant becomes obsolete, money gets spent, and executives get old. In this respect, survival of the firm depends on profit; unless profits are generated and used for generation of future profit and replacement of resources, the firm will eventually run down". Financial resources have a special position among the resources, as they are the only resource generated by the activities of the firm in the market place and, moreover, directly convertible into the other types of resources (Lahti 1985, 6). All resources have also spatial dimensions, as the operations of the firm are partly tied to resources available in the host country, in the case of FDI. Synergy. The joint effects of the set of scope and the resource deployment decisions produce synergy. The level of synergy defines the potential of the firm. In the case of direct investment, however, an additional element of the host country has to be taken into consideration. With regard to scope decision, the host country may be the same as the chosen target market (local market oriented investment) but it may also be different (international market oriented investment). Accordingly, with regard to resource deployment, investment may be driven by the existing resources of the firm to be utilised in 29 the host country, or the investment is attracted by such resources available in the host country, which the firm does not possess beforehand. Marketing and logistics. The second stage of Lahti's strategy-performance model, performance realisation, consists of marketing and logistics elements, as discussed earlier. The aim of marketing is to utilise the firm's chosen potential efficiently (Killstrom 2005, 54). Through marketing, the firm positions itself in the competitive environment. Firms use the set of various activity patterns to pursue their marketing objectives. This set is called the marketing mix and it has been popularised by McCarthy (1960) in a four-factor classification, which includes product, price, place and promotion decisions (4Ps). Firms prepare products or services with certain prices for the target market, which is reached through the distributions channels (place) with the help of promotion (eg sales promotion, advertising, sales force, public relations). In Lahti's strategy-performance model, place decisions are incorporated in the logistics element. Logistics refers to the arrangement of the availability of products and services and to the creation of contacts with the customers (Killstrom 2005, 53). It is a part of the supply chain process that "plans, implements, and controls the efficient, effective forward and reverse flow and storage of goods, services, and related information between the point of origin and the point of consumption in order to meet customers' requirements", as defined by the Council of Logistics Management (2003). Thus, logistics does not deal only with delivering products from the supplier to the manufacturer and to the end-user, but is comparable with the broader concept of supply chain management (SCM). In practice, logistics can be measured by such variables as delivery reliability and time, flexibility of order-delivery process, warehousing, transportation routes, and telecommunications links. Competitive advantage. Competitive advantage refers to the organisation's unique position vis-a-vis competitors. Based on the firm's resource deployment and scope decisions, competitive advantage is created through marketing and logistics if the supply of the firm fits the market demand better than its competitors' supply. Competitive advantage results in the firm's performance. Performance. The third and final stage of the Lahti's strategy-performance model, the performance achieved, or the result of the strategy, is composed of four kinds of results, namely profitability, external effectiveness, internal efficiency, and flexibility47. Among 30 them, profitability is the basic indicator of the firm's performance. External effectiveness indicates the firm's position in the market in relation to competitors, which can be measured by market share or corporate image, for example. Internal efficiency refers to the firm's ability to generate turnover and profit through its existing resources. In this context, the total sum of the balance sheet may be used to indicate the resources as a whole. Finally, flexibility explains how the firm has maintained its profitability in a changing environment. As such, it indicates the continuity of the business. It is obvious that also in the case of direct investment, the foreign unit has to make contribution to the TNC. When the success of foreign units is evaluated, various perspectives of its contribution are possible. For example, the behavioural perspective emphasises the development of the separate culture and identity of the foreign unit, while the learning perspective focuses on the creation of knowledge in the foreign unit (cf. Buchel et al. 1998, 198). In the present study, however, an economic perspective is chosen, similar to Lahti's strategy-performance model. It means that the foreign unit increases the value of the parent company. It has been stated also in empirical studies (Kelly & Philippatos 1982) that FDI is motivated primarily by profit rather than behavioural considerations, for example. 2.2 Theories of Foreign Direct Investment Economists and policy makers in developing countries often expect very much in respect to FDI. Investors are not in a hurry to invest their money there They have several options how to enter a foreign markets: they can do it in the conventional way by producing at home and then going for trade in goods and services or they can build up a foreign production base either by a greenfield investment, by joint venture or by acquiring an existing company. And they can opt for an intermediate mode of market entry: they can conclude a contractual arrangement with a foreign producer in form of licensing or offshore processing (Schmidt, Naujoks, 1993). Although there is an enormous literature on FDI, a generally accepted theory is still lacking (Agarwal, 1991). Even the most popular approach, the eclectic theory of international production developed by Dunning (1980) and others, is far from a generalization (Parry, 31 1985; Rugman, 1985). Notwithstanding the reservations it postulates the conditions under which FDI is undertaken at all (Sander, Schmidt, 1993). 2.2.1 Explanation of FDI The macro-economic question about why FDI happens is usually answered on an aggregate level, using rational choice theories. One of the oldest approaches is developed from the product life cycle hypothesis by Vernon, who argues that the more mature a product and its production process is, the more likely it is to be produced in developing countries for cost saving reasons (Vernon 1996), A different explanation is the oligopolistic reaction theory which states that an initial FDI by one firm induces the other firms in the same industry to follow their competitor abroad (Knickerbocker 1973). Dunning's eclectic FDI theory tries to incorporate as many reasons for FDIs as possible. He hypothesizes that FDIs happen if the company has in a certain country ownership-specific advantages, internationalization advantages and localization advantages (Dunning 1988). Dunning's theory and the others in this tradition of research are situated on an aggregate level, and do not pay specific attention to the individual firm. However, these theories help to understand the rational of some direct investment decisions even on a firm level. Although they are generally macroeconomic theories, they do help to explain why particular FDI decisions, e.g., the production of product X and not product Y in a foreign country, are made by individual companies. 2.2.2 Econometric studies on Influence of Tax Policy on Investment Much econometric work on the cost of capital has centered on the specific issue of the effectiveness of taxes on investment. Bosworth (1984) in a survey of the literature concluded that taxes probably have a significant, but small, effect on investment, but also that the evidence for this proposition was weak. Investigators in other countries have also concluded that tax policy has a small effect on investment demand (Sumner, 1986; Devereux, 1989). Feldstein has been perhaps the strongest proponent of the importance of taxation (Feldstein, 1982). 32 Bosworth (1985) assessed the 1981 and 1982 reforms and found that they did not have much influence on the pickup of investment demand in the 1981-84 period. He found that the investment recovery was the strongest in sectors where the tax changes were relatively minor. Corker (1988) attributed only a distinctly subsidiary role to the three reforms, arguing that output was the dominant factor. Boskin (1988) in contrast concluded that tax policy "is an important (but hardly exclusive) determinant of investment", and that the end the 1981 and 1982 U.S. tax reforms had a substantial influence in stimulating investment. 2.2.3 Micro-Theories What determines whether a firm decides to establish production facilities abroad rather than export its product or license overseas entrepreneurs to produce instead? A common sense answer might be that it is the prospect of earning higher profit which induces firms to invest abroad, primarily because of lower labor costs. However, although differences in labor costs may sometimes help influence firms' decisions to locate abroad, this is far from being the whole story. As the FDI data in the previous section showed, the majority of FDI still goes to the advanced countries, in particular the United States where wages are high relative to those in developing countries. Economists have long recognized that there will normally be extra costs involved at least initially for a firm investing in a foreign country where it is not familiar with local markets and institutions. At a theoretical level, economic analysis offers three main explanatory approaches which attempt to show why, despite these disadvantages, firms may still wish to invest abroad. These approaches focus on different aspects, namely: · ownership advantages: (Hymer, 1960.) such advantages are thought to arise from economies of scale with respect to intangible assets such as skilled management capacity or organizational know-how which may also be exploited to even greater advantage by investing abroad. · locational advantages: (Vernon, 1966.) these arise in part from the fact that, for many products, there is a production cycle involving several stages, with new technology first being produced and used in the home country and, once standardized, shifted abroad because either nearness to the final market or lower factor costs make this advantageous. 33 However, even if one were to accept the characterization of technological stages in this theory, the theory does not explain why a firm has to establish its presence abroad rather than license its technology or products. · internalization advantages: Buckley and Casson (1976) attempted to fill the gap in the locational advantages theories by calling attention to advantages which may accrue to a firm from "internalization", i.e. engaging in foreign production itself, rather than sub-contracting or licensing it to a foreign firm. These authors drew on the general "transactions costs" theory of Williamson (1975) which provides a rationale to explain why it may be more advantageous to concentrate certain activities within the firm, rather than rely on the market mechanism to achieve the same objectives, say, by licensing or sub-contracting. The basic idea here is that there are transactions costs of various kinds involved in operating through the market mechanism. When such costs are greater than those arising from carrying out activities within the firm, internalization, that is, establishing an overseas subsidiary, will be preferred. These mainstream theoretical approaches are not mutually exclusive; nor are they comprehensive. They do however encompass most of the practical reasons why firms may invest abroad (for example, access to markets, labor costs, proximity to raw materials, a more lax approach to the environment, and fiscal incentives). There are, however, other theories which explain multinational investment in rather different terms, such as oligopolistic rivalry between firms at the global level, the empire-building motives of managers of large corporations in advanced countries, or strategic entry deterrence, that is, the build-up of overseas capacity in order to stop potential rivals from entering any specific market or markets. Such theories may be better than the mainstream theories in explaining some of the observed facts concerning FDI, notably the existence of FDI surges. 2.2.4 Eclectic Paradigm The theory, developed by John Dunning, is called the Eclectic Paradigm. It is called a paradigm because it is a framework for integrating other theories that explain the activities of multinational enterprises. The Eclectic Paradigm consists of three advantages: 34 Ownership Advantages. This helps explain the "why," or motivation, of multinational enterprise activities. Ownership advantages are defined as the degree to which a firm possesses sustainable ownership-specific advantages over other firms in the market. Some examples of these advantages are innovative capacity, access to financial resources, and organizational and marketing systems. Location Advantages. This helps explain the "where," or location, of multinational enterprise activities. These advantages are specific to the country. Some examples are natural resources, labor force (availability and quality), and societal structure (legal systems, political structure). Internalization Advantages. This helps explain the "how," or the manner, of multinational enterprise activities. Internalization is the degree of ownership and control. At one end of the spectrum is no control or ownership. Transactions are made at arm's length or through the market. At the other end of the spectrum is full control. The firm "internalizes" the market transactions by owning or controlling the other firm. The transactions are not arm's-length. A multinational enterprise's degree of foreign direct investment (and other foreign valueadding activities) depends on four conditions being present. These conditions form the basis of the Eclectic Paradigm: The extent to which a firm possesses ownership advantages over other firms in the particular market. The extent to which a multinational enterprise believes that it is in its interest to exploit the ownership advantages rather than sell them to another firm. Examples of transferring these ownership advantages would be the licensing of a technology or the franchising of a business concept. The extent to which there are location-specific advantages of a certain country that increase the value of the ownership advantages over the location advantages of other countries. The extent to which the foreign direct investment is consistent with the long-term strategy of the firm. 35 The Eclectic Paradigm has attempted to draw together a number of related theories explaining MNE activity. Business scholars disagree over the value of this paradigm. However, most agree that it is a useful framework for evaluating the attractiveness of foreign direct investments. Initially it has been stated that the existence of each ownership, locational and internationalization advantages is a necessary and the simultaneous existence of them is a sufficient condition for FDI to occur. More recently it has been argued that locational advantages of a potential host country could be a both necessary and sufficient condition for FDI (Stehn 1992). FDI may be undertaken even without firm specific advantages on part of the foreign investor if the potential host country's locational advantages are large enough to (over)compensate for only small or even lacking firm-specific advantages. This argument has important implications for economic policy towards FDI. 2.2.5 Macro-economic Theories In addition to these micro-economic theories of FDI, there is an older literature which contains macro-level theoretical approaches and "broad-brush" accounts which attempt to explain why foreign investment takes places. These include various theories of economic imperialism, based on different interpretations of the workings of the capitalist system. Some are simple "rate of profit" theories which can quite easily be accommodated within the neo-liberal framework sustaining the idea of unfettered flows of capital on a global level. Others which focus on the "vent for surplus" have greater political content in that capital export is seen as a necessity under certain (low) wage conditions and some of these theories predict a cataclysmic end to the capitalist system. Governments, too, (particularly of the rich advanced countries) make substantial efforts to encourage overseas investment by their enterprises, with a view to ensuring access to natural resources or increasing potential exports of capital goods (including military equipment), while at the same time generating inflows of profit remittances benefiting the balance of payments. Such efforts sometimes correspond to a geopolitical strategy to "tame" through indirect influence the policies of governments in countries with the actual or potential political and economic power to exert a regional or global influence. 36 2.3 Motivational studies and Risk in Decision process 2.3.1 Motivational studies Within the context of motivational studies for foreign direct investments, authors investigate the initiating forces of FDIs. One can generally differentiate between two main groups, market-oriented vs. cost oriented strategies. Behavioral studies, which may also focus on decision-making processes, often concentrate on the motives for FDI. One of Aharoni's goals, for example, was to analyze in detail why companies wanted to invest in the relatively small market of Israel and not somewhere else (Aharoni 1966: 9). It is important to know the motives for the investment abroad, to know what type of information needs to be searched, and what types of problems might have to be confronted during the decision process. More detailed motives for foreign investment will be discussed in the next section of the paper 2.3.2 Motives for FDI The difficulties in providing a general theory of FDI also stem from the observation that the motives are differing considerably between the different markets in which foreign investors are engaged (Agarwal, 1991). The traditional literature has focused on market access as the main motive for FDI. It states that there is an optimal timing for starting FDI: a company should have reached a certain market share in a foreign market by means of exporting before becoming an investor there. Since 1960, there are several empirical studies about the approaches of the managers to direct investment into foreign countries with motives lists. However, it is possible that the managers are not able to define the real motives and/or are not ready to term the real motives, but solely say that ones, which care for their image (Rubinstein, 1975). The Germany Industry and Trade Committee (DIHT) using inquiry of companies acquire a detailed list of motives for direct investment into foreign countries (Kayser 2001): 37 Exhibit 5. List of Motives for direct investment Motive Rank Expansion of the overseas activity onto new markets 2.87 Protection and expansion of a present market 2.38 Protection and control of the distribution in the host country 2.05 Political Stability of the host country 1.68 Export basis for products of the parent company 1.32 Overcoming of trading and export restraints 1.31 Expectation of a higher rate of return on investment 1.14 Supplier for company of the host country 1.03 Low costs of wages 1.01 Protection of the maintenance in the host country 0.97 Employment creation 0.73 Fortification of the economic autonomy of the host country 0.64 Saving of transportation costs 0.58 Government aid's arrangements of the host country for direct investment 0.53 Production for the parent company (re-import) 0.52 Realization of technologies, which were developed for the special needs of the host country 0.51 Processing of domestic raw materials for the inland needs of the host country 0.42 Shifting rated on conditional on Exchange rate 0.42 Supplier for a domestic corporate, which likewise operate in the host country 0.41 Low prices for raw materials and utilities 0.39 Government aid's arrangements of the country (what company come from), for direct investments 0.32 Protection and extension of the raw material basis 0.30 Other reasons 0.17 Protection of the energy supply 0.15 International Institutions' Aid's arrangements for direct investments 0.08 The relative importance of labor costs for FDI decisions, however, is not as straightforward as it might be appear (Agarwal, 1989). Low labor costs are necessary, though not a sufficient conditions. One factor which is reducing the importance of cheap labor as a locational advantage is the increasing degree of automatization in most manufacturing industries. Actually, FDI is more important in industries producing sophisticated products (such as automotive, electrical, machinery and transport equipment) than in industries producing standardized products. In the textile and clothing industry, e.g., foreign investors 38 prefer sub-contracting rather than FDI as these industries are not characterized by firmspecific advantages which might induce equity arrangements. 2.3.3 Risk theories The assumed or actual risk of decisions in general, and especially that of investment decisions in foreign countries, receives a lot of attention in the literature. "Risk" as an expression is used widely in the literature even though authors are actually referring often to uncertainty or even ambiguity rather than risk itself (Laverty 1996). According to the mathematical definition, "risk" refers to the case where the probability of every alternative is known, even though the actual outcome is not. Decision making under uncertainty, in contrast would refer to a case where the probabilities of alternatives are not known with certainty. During strategic decision-making processes even the alternatives are usually not known. This is why Mintzberg (1976, p.251) introduced the concept of ambiguity, "where almost nothing is given or easily determined.". Thus, even if the literature or interviewees talk about the "risk" of investing, it should be understood that the terms is used in the popular way for expressing any condition of risk, uncertainty, or ambiguity. The trade-off between expected value and risk plays a major role in rational decision theories. The researchers rejecting the normative model of decision making proposed new ways of explaining, how companies choose between alternatives. It was found that decisionmakers are usually risk averse and are influenced by many factors other than risk and potential pay-offs (Wharton 1992). 2.4 Modes of entry strategies FDI flows consists largely of four categories of capital account transactions (commonly referred to as “modes of entry”), namely: “greenfield” investment (whereby an enterprise is created essentially from scratch); mergers and acquisitions involving significant crossborder elements; earnings reinvested in foreign-owned companies; and cross-border loans 39 and trade credits between related enterprises. The latter two are not of major concern in a development context, whereas reinvested earnings sometimes make up a significant part of the FDI flows between mature economies. The potential benefits of FDI summarized above apply in principle to all FDI, regardless of modes of entry. Nevertheless, many developing country governments have expressed a strong preference for greenfield over other types of investment, and some have voiced concerns over the effects of M&A originating abroad. This persistent skepticism towards the takeover of domestic enterprises by foreign investors generally has both political and economic roots. In political terms, host country authorities may convince their domestic constituency relatively easily of the advantages of greenfield investment, whereas the acquisition of entrenched national enterprises by foreigners often breeds resentment. Moreover, in cases where host country authorities use their influence over domestic enterprises to make them pursue aims other than the maximization of shareholder value, transferring the ownership to foreign investors may be considered as a loss of sovereignty. Finally, where corporate restructuring is a likely outcome of foreign takeovers, M&As, however potentially beneficial to the broader host economy, - are often opposed by powerful interest groups. The economic arguments most often made for preferring greenfield investment to M&As relate to the amount of money eventually made available for productive investment in the host economy. Except for the unlikely case where the sellers of an enterprise promptly reinvest the entire proceeds in the domestic enterprise sector, portfolio reallocation will, at least in the short term, divert some of the M&A proceeds away from productive investment. This scenario is exacerbated where the host country investment climate is perceived as poor, particularly where confidence is so low that the national authorities face problems of capital flight. Another economic argument for greenfield investment is based on the value of FDI as a source of stable external finance. The irreversibility of most greenfield investment makes it a more “patient” source of capital than M&As, at least where M&As take the form of the acquisition of listed equity on secondary markets. A further rationale for host countries’ preference for greenfield investment could emanate from the fact that the motivation factors surveyed above do not always apply equally across the modes of delivery. A stylized representation is proposed in Exhibit 6. 40 Exhibit 6. Predominant motivation factors and modes of delivery Greenfield Mergers and Acquisitions Resource-seeking FDI Yes Rare Market-seeking FDI Yes Yes Efficiency-seeking FDI Rare Yes Strategic-asset seeking FDI Rare Yes While no firm conclusions should be drawn from this simple categorization, it is interesting to note how resource-seeking FDI, which is almost universally sought by countries at an early stage of economic development, tends to take the form of greenfield investment. Strategic-asset-seeking FDI, on the other hand, consists mainly of enterprise takeovers, and while such investment generally benefits the host country, certain special cases continue to raise concerns among policy makers. Technologies acquired via M&As, for example, may be priced at market values that fail to reflect their potential future external effects, which, if they are subsequently transferred out of the host economy, may lead to an overall economic loss. Another example of “unwanted” M&As is the case in which foreign investors acquire enterprises with the main purpose of increasing their market power. This may stifle competition in the host economy. 2.5 Political environment in the context of international investment The conceptualisation of the firm, as done in strategic management and the geography of enterprise literatures, and discussed in the previous Chapter, leads to the question of the boundaries of the firm: where does the firm end and the environment begin? Answering the question is difficult. First of all, the definition of the firm's environment depends on the approach as explained earlier in the context of different approaches to industrial geography. Neoclassism emphasises natural resources, labour, the market, and competitors as the major factors of the environment. Behaviourism focuses on the decision-maker's perceptual space, while structuralism points out the labour market as the main constitution of the environment. Furthermore, the geography of enterprise approach has adapted an institutionalist view of the firm's environment arguing that the firm is part of a power network consisting of external institutions, such as parent firms, subsidiaries, subcontractors, rivals, financial institutions, and the home and host governments (Hayter 1997, 79-81). In the context of 41 FDI, especially the bargaining relation between the firm and the host government plays a role. This perspective includes also an implicit idea that the firm is able to influence its external environment at least to some extent. Secondly, the internationalisation of economic activities makes the definition of the environment hard. There are no fixed boundaries between the firm and the environment because firms grow by internalising parts of their external environment. The scope of the firms is continuously enlarging, which makes it difficult to decide which parts of the total environment should be incorporated in the analysis, (cf. Wood 1981, 416). In the present study, the use of the modified strategy-performance model defines the scope of analysis, and determines the parts of the environment to be analysed, as well. Thirdly, the borderline between the internal and the external is questionable as the same resource may appear as a firm-specific or country-specific factor. For example, financial capital may be achieved inside or outside the firm, and it may be achieved on the home market, the host market, or a third country. Financial capital may be an existing resource of the firm at the time of investment, but the availability of financial capital in the host country may also be an incentive to invest. Therefore, it is important to analyse both internal and external factors at the same time. In the following, attention is turned to the environment of the firm with special reference to the political environment of the firm in the host country. First, political environment of the firm is compared with the other relevant parts of the firm's environment that are included in the modified strategy-performance model. Then, the particular role of the political environment of the firm in the context of FDI is scrutinised. Finally, the firm's abilities to influence or gain from its political environment are discussed. 2.5.1 Political environment as a parts of the firm's general environment As explained earlier in Chapter Two, a particular target market can be analysed in terms of a general macro-environment and a specific competitive environment. The general macroenvironment is further divided into natural, demographic, cultural, political, economic, and technological environments. Different parts of the firm's environment can be put in hierarchical order in which political, economic, demographic, and technological 42 environments manifest the cultural environment and in which the natural environment forms the frame environment for all other environments, as illustrated in Exhibit 7. (cf. Koivisto 1998, 75; Jwa 2002,168) Exhibit 7. Hierarchical structure of the different macro-environments of the firm Source: Modified fromKoivisto 1998, 75. The classification of the environment of the firm originates from marketing literature (eg Kotler 1980) and in the context of the FDI it has to be enlarged to cover not only the host market but various potential resources available in the host country for the TNC. The importance of the potential resources depends on the type of investment, whether FDI is directed to the local or international market. In the case that the host market is not the target market of the investor, as in the case of export-oriented investment, the potential resources available in the host country may play a more important role for the investment decision than the host market as such. Starting from the natural environment of the firm, Kotler (1980, 110-112) has defined it as a subject of challenges and opportunities related to raw materials, energy, and environmental issues. In the context of the FDI, the natural environment is even a wider concept including 43 the physical features of the host country, such as location of the country that determines the accessibility, climate that may dictate modifications in product or affect people as consumers or workers, the regional structure that may divide the nation into distinct markets or hinder transportation, and natural hazards that may require a special building code, for example (Terpstra 1978, 68-70). It is important to include ecological aspects in the analysis, as also done by Kotler, similar to other environmental analyses, such as STEEP, LE PEST C, and environmental scanning. The cultural environment of the firm in the host country cannot be understood without referring to the whole civilisation to which it belongs. Civilisation is created by religion, history, language, habits, institutions, and the people's identity. According to Huntington (2003, 48-49), religion can be recognised as the most important determinant of culture. The cultural environment of the firm forms the conceptual and normative basis for the political, economic, demographic, and technological environments of the firm, although the latter ones also influence the first one (cf. Koivisto 1998, 72-76). According to Kotler (1980, 122), the cultural environment of the firm primarily shapes the values and attitudes, which in turn have an impact on the firm's marketing. Widening this marketing oriented view to cover also FDI, different business cultures, the level of internationalisation, tolerance of foreigners, and equality whether a question of race, gender, ethnic or social origin, age, language, or others, has to be considered. The political environment of the firm is defined by Kotler (1980, 115-121) as the determinant of the rights and responsibilities of the firm by laws and social order. This definition refers basically to such issues as the regulation against unfair competition and unfair consumer practises, the social costs of the production, and the pressure groups lobbying for better consumer protection. Thus, Kotler observes exclusively the domestic market and discusses more administrative than political aspects of the society (cf. Boddewyn & Brewer 1994). Extending this view to the FDI, the political environment of the firm has to include the various political factors that can affect the TNCs operation or its decision-making in the target country (Terpstra 1978, 119), starting from the political system of the host country to its foreign relations. In addition, it has to be extended to cover legal systems and economic policies, including trade and investment policies in particular. Thus, in the present study, the political environment of the firm includes the host country's overall policy in general and economic policy in particular. These policies are shaped not 44 only by the domestic conditions in the host country, but by the world politico-economic conditions. The economic environment of the firm, as defined by Kotler (1980, 108-110), refers to the purchasing power of the market. Especially, the market-seeking TNCs are interested in the purchasing power as an indicator of the economic environment. It is a function of income, prices, savings and credit availability. At the market level, it is normally measured by GDP. In addition, FDI as a form of international finance makes TNCs interested in exchange and interest rates in the host country in comparison to other countries. Altogether, in the context of the FDI, the concept of the economic environment has to be extended to cover the economic system that shapes the level of economic development and production structure. The demographic environment of the firm refers to the population, which equals the market (Kotler 1980,103-108). Further segmentation of the market requires information on the geographical distribution of the population; density; mobility; age distribution; birth, marriage and death rates; racial, ethnic and religious structures. All these various indicators reflect the demographic transition of the particular country. Another universal demographic process is urbanisation. For an investor, the extent of urbanisation in the host country tells that there are consumer behavioural differences between people in cities and rural areas. Moreover, in the context of FDI, the demographic environment refers also to the manpower available for the TNC as a resource. Thus, there are many aspects related to the quality of labour, which are interesting for the firm, such as the number of labour, wage level, educational level, and the rate of unemployment. The technological environment of the firm is created and adopted by individuals and organisations, and thus, it is dependent on social processes. Technology enables creating new products and processes, new organisational and geographical arrangements of economic activities and new structures. (Dicken 1992, 97-98) The technological environment of the firm can be measured through such indicators as productivity, infrastructure, innovativeness, and the R&D level in the host country. According to Kotler (1980, 112-115), it is subject to rapid and sometimes unpredictable changes, which may create but also destroy industries. Basically, technological change, which has occurred worldwide along with the industrialisation, can be divided into long waves based on a few major new technologies. Each wave is associated with a particularly significant technological change and a specific geographical pattern. 45 In addition to the general macro-environment, the Lahti's strategy-performance model has placed attention to the specific competitive environment. The model states that contrary to the general macro-environment, a firm may have an impact on its competitive environment to some extent being part of it by itself. According to Kotler (1980, 48-49), the firm meets its rivals in three types of competition: generic competition, product-form competition, and enterprise competition. Lahti (1987), in his turn, emphasises the competition over the markets or the resources, and recognises various types of competition in terms of product, price, marketing communication, and logistics. Finally, the prevailing market forms in the host country may have an impact on FDI. The market form may be a monopoly, monopolistic competition (a duopoly, an oligopoly, a heterogeneous polyopoly), or perfect competition (a homogeneous polyopoly). In the case of a monopoly, imports are restricted, which favours direct investment. Also a duopolistic and an oligopolistic market may favour direct investment because production within the concentrated market offers a better basis to compete than production outside of the market. According to Luostarinen (1982, 30-31), the more monopolistic the market in the target country, the more it favours direct investment operations. However, the entry depends also on the reactions of the rivals. There are also other agents, which may have an impact on the firm's competitive environment, such as the subcontractors, suppliers, labour, governments, and pressure groups. They may all have an impact on the firm and the market, but usually also the firm may have an impact on them to some extent. 2.5.2 The specific role of the political environment Kobrin (1979, 69), has explained that the political environment is different from other elements of the firm's environment because it incorporates aims to gain, maintain or increase power at the state level. Thus, the political environment largely determines the framework of economic activity. Consequently, Boddewyn and Brewer (1994) have argued that the political environment is in contrast to other elements of the firm's environment. They explain that TNCs are used to handle differences in nature, cultures, economies, demographies, and technologies in the home country. There, they manage these differences through market segmentation. In the host country, however, TNCs enter a political space of foreign sovereignty. Entering this political space is different from entering just an economic 46 space because the host government can intervene in the TNC entry, operation, and exit, as long as the host country's territory is concerned. For example, national laws of the host country affect many cross-border activities, such as the investment of capital, payment of dividends to a foreign investor, and customs and duties to import. Thus, the political environment creates a significant border for international business of a TNC. (Boddewyn & Brewer 1994, 123-126) These arguments make it meaningful to study the political environment separately from other relevant factors having an impact on the investment decision of the firm. In international business (eg Terpstra 1978, 119), the political environment of the firm is defined widely to consist of any national or international political factors that can affect the operations and decision-making of TNC. FDI studies define political environment through the political risk, as the political events in a particular country influence the operation of the TNC in that country. Political risk has been studied only since the late 1960s when the first TNCs started to seek low-cost production locations abroad. The political risk assessment was not considered a top prority in most TNCs before such drastic events as the first oil crisis in 1973 and the upheaval in Iran in 1979 (Simon 1982, 66). Kobrin (1979) has conducted a literature review of the various definitions of the political risk, and ends up defining the firm's political risk in terms of host government intervention in TNC operations. Another approach to political risk focuses on political events, such as instability, violence, or constraints on TNC operations. The previous definition highlights the actor, notably the host government but also other governmental and societal actors, while the latter puts emphasis on attitudes and actions. From the TNC perspective, political risk is part of the firm's environmental risk. Political risk can arise with regard to ownership, operations and transfers. The ownership risk arises due to uncertainty about the host government's decision to change foreign investors' ownership. If realised, the risk may take the form of domestication, or even expropriation, confiscation, or nationalisation. Consequently, operation risk refers to uncertainty about host government policies constraining the operations of the TNC in the host country. Policies can be changed in terms of prices, terms of competition, taxation, or product specifications. Finally, transfer risk is related to uncertainty about the host government's policies that may restrict TNCs ability to transfer profits or capital out of the host country. TNCs can reduce the political risk by negotiating with the host government. 47 Similar to studies on political risk, the present study discusses the political environment of the firm through the actors and the actions that may have an impact on TNC. From the TNC perspective, the host government is the most important actor, as it is able to intervene directly in FDI. The role of the host government intervention in FDI is shaped by two major forces. First, it is dependent on the domestic conditions including the political structure and the economic imperatives. Second, it is subject to change according to the fluctuation in the international politico-economic conditions. Not only the host government and its intervention that creates the political environment of the firm in the host country, but the external conditions outside the host country may give an impetus to the emergence of political change. Thus, the political environment of the firm has to be considered both in terms of internally and externally-based events (Simon 1982, 66). This kind of setting is typical of studies focusing on the role of the host government intervening in FDI (eg Goodman 1987, Korhonen 2001). A further distinction can be made between actions and policies directed at all foreign firms in a particular country or selected fields of foreign business (Robock 1971), or between governmental and societal actions and policies (Simon 1982, 66). All of these aspects have been put together by Simon (1982, 67) who has generated a general framework for political risk assessment (viz. Exhibit 8). Exhibit 8. A general framework for political risk assessmen Internal Macro Governmental nationalisation, - coup d'etats Expropriation Societal - revolution - civil war - creeping - factional conflict nationalisation - ethnic or religious turmoil - widespread riots or terrorism - nationwide strikes, protests or boycotts - shifts in public - repatriation restrictions - leadership opinion - union activism straggle - radical regime change - high inflation - high interest rates - bureacratic policies 48 Societal - selective terrorism - selective strikes - selective protest - national boycott of the firm Micro Governmental - selective nationalisation or expropriation - selective indigenisation - joint venture pressure - discriminatory taxes - local content or hiring laws - industry-specific regulations - breach of contract - subsidisation of External - cross-national - nuclear war - international guerilla warfare - conventional war - border conflicts - alliance shifts - embargoes or international activist groups boycotts - high external debt service ration - international terrorism - international - international terrorism - world public opinion - disinvestment pressure - foreign TNC competition - selective international boycott of the firm economic instability local competition price controls - diplomatic stress between host and home country - bilateral trade agreements - multilateral trade agreements - import or export ternational - foreign government interference Source: Simon 1982, 67. Since the 1980s, when Simon built his framework, the political and economic developments have become increasingly interdependent. In addition, in the case of FDI, the investment policies together with the more general economic policies have a central role when assessing the political environment of the host economy. Certainly, the investment policies are not the only actions that may have an influence on the TNC's decision making, but many changes in the host country's overall political system may be as influential. Thus, the present study has divided the political environment of the firm into national and international conditions similar to Simon (1982), but also into overall policies that influence all firms in the host country whether local or foreign, and economic policies that may be directed to certain industries or firms (eg foreign firms only). This distinction is similar to Robock (1971). However, the societal issues have not been separated from the governmental issues in order to reduce the complexity of the framework. As a result, the components of the political environment to be used in the present study are illustrated in Exhibit 9 and will be discussed thoroughly below. Exhibit 9. Components of the political environment nditions conditions International Overall policies Political system of the host country Economic policies Economic system of the host country The host government's The host government's 49 conditions international relations economic relations Source: Modified from Korhonen (2001, 48). TNCs are interested in the impact of the political changes rather the direction of the change. The direction of the change means, for example, that the host government may turn to be more interventionist or less interventionist. For TNC, the direction of the change may, however, be a positive, negative, or inconsequential factor. This is because TNC may perceive the change as inconsequential if the intervention is not directed to FDI policy at all. In the case that the FDI policy is intervened, this may lead to a more restricted or a more liberal FDI policy. Therefore, the changes in the political environment as such are not important, but the way how the TNC interpret them through its strategies. Thus, the impact on TNC depends upon both the characteristics of the firm (internal factors) and the characteristics of the environment (external factors). In addition, TNCs are interested in the speed of the change. Certainly, it is easier for TNCs to be adjusted to gradual rather than rapid changes. However, changes are drastic only for those who have not made scenarios for the future, or interpreted the scenarios correctly. This is because most changes are preceded by a recognisable development path and could have been basically predicted. Political system of the host country. The political system of a country can be defined as a persistent pattern of human relationship, which involves control, influence, power, or authority (Dahl 1976, 4). The political system includes the polar cases of authoritarianism and democracy, and all the various conditions between them. However, the political system as such does not have an impact on the firm's investment decision as long as the system is stable and predictable. Instead, political instability blocks the possibilities of TNCs and thus, they tend to avoid countries with an unstable political climate (Luostarinen 1982, 35). Instability refers usually to drastic changes in the host country's political system, such as a coup d'etat, separatist movements, or a new reform-minded regime. However, the impacts of change for TNCs is not straight-forward. For example, a coup d'etat can be made by a radical government expropriating all TNCs, but also by a conservative government returning expropriated properties of TNCs (Kobrin 1979, 70). An example of significant change in the political system is the handing over of the sovereignty of Hong Kong from Britain to China, which took place over night on July 1, 1997. The political change did not, however, influence business because Hong Kong's economic and social systems were guaranteed to 50 remain unchanged for at least 50 years although it came under the communist government of China. The political system of the host country basically creates the prevalent attitudes toward business enterprises whether domestic or foreign. TNC needs to take into account the overall legal system of the country. In order to manage the various legal issues a lawyer who understands local laws and practices is essential. In many cases, TNCs utilise multinational law firms, which have expanded abroad, usually through mergers or other arrangements with local firms, in order to serve their clients in foreign markets. The host government's international political. TNCs are not independent to choose the investment location, as they operate under a global political system composed of nation states. TNC investing in a particular host country is always a foreign actor and thus, involved with the host country's international relations (Terpstra 1978, 124). The host country is a part of the international political system and its role there may vary from isolated to integrated. TNCs have to be aware of the host country's commitment to international organisations and agreements, regional arrangement, and bilateral relations. Basically, the host country's integration with the world community increases its attractiveness as an investment target, because supranational organisations have an impact on global policy and thus, they may prevent the emergence of political risks in a certain region or country. Entering a supranational organisation may also give additional boost to the FDI, because the organisation may have particular uniforming requirements for its members. Fulfilling these requirements makes the developments in the host country more predictable and similar to other countries that belong to the same group. For example, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), which was originally, in 1967, formed to secure political and military stability in the region, has resulted in the member countries gradually increasing their role in the world community. Later, political co-operation has turned to focus more on economic cooperation in the form of the ASEAN Free Trade Area (Afta), and the ASEAN as a region has become an increasingly interesting investment target for TNCs. Although the membership in general may increase the attractiveness of all member countries, the risks may, however, increase in a single member country due to some internal tensions (eg the case of Indonesia). 51 Isolation from the world community usually makes the country less attractive in terms of the FDI, such as in the case of North Korea. However, isolation may also be an inconsequential factor for TNCs if the situation is understandable as in the case of Taiwan, which has been isolated against its own will from most of the international organisations due to the pressure of mainland China, and maintains only quasi-diplomatic functions. Despite, this Taiwan's economic position has remained strong and it is an important target of international investments. From the TNC perspective, a special feature of a host country's international relations is its relationship with the home country of the TNC. If the host government dislikes the policy of the home country, it may hinder the TNCs entry, operation, or exit in the host country. TNC may even be attacked or boycotted along with the anti home country feelings in the host country. Also the historical reasons may affect the relations, as between a former colonial power and its colonies. (Terpstra 1978,124) The host government's economic relations. The host government's relation to the international market may vary from independent to dependent. If the country is dependent on trade, it is also vulnerable to market fluctuations regardless of sound macroeconomic fundamentals or any stabilisation policy. These constraints in the world economy are mostly beyond the host government's intervention. In addition, it has been argued that due to the globalisation process, national governments are going to lose part of their traditional functions and power to intervene in the traditional ways. This is because globalisation is making the world's economic system and society increasingly uniform, integrated, and interdependent. Joining an economic integration or organisation is likely to increase FDI in the host country because of the increasing stability and the uniforming requirements of the organisations. In addition, the international agreements and established practises play a role. For example, membership of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) prevents the home country from imposing new tariffs or non-tariff barriers, while membership of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, or a development bank aids a home country's international financial situation (Terpstra 1978, 125). The FDI is positively correlated with the host country's integration in the world economy, because most of the world FDI takes place among the core countries. Among peripheries, TNCs view the developing economies as risky because of the possible politico-economic changes are likely to be more rapid and have 52 more surprising consequences for the TNCs than in the core countries, which are similar among themselves. Economic system of the host country. Economic policies can be defined as government activities to promote economic development. In creating the welfare of the country, the government aims to achieve a number of other economic objectives, such as a high and sustained level of economic growth, full employment, low inflation, and a sound balance of payments and a strong currency value in foreign exchange markets (Nellis & Parker 1996, 12) The role of the government in this context varies between the interventionist and noninterventionist. The free market approach demonstrates that the market mechanism guarantees economic efficiency and thus, the less the state intervenes, the better the market works. The governed market approach claims that the economy is inherently unstable and requires active government intervention to achieve stability. In a governed market, TNC needs special skills in order to convince the host government of the benefits of the FDI for the host country. Trade policies are closely linked with the investment policies. From the host government's perspective, there are at least two ways how countries can combine trade and investment. Some countries have combined liberal trade with restricted FDI and become net investors abroad, while other countries have had an open FDI policy but restricted imports, and they have become net importers of foreign capital. From the TNC perspective, high tariffs and non-tariff barriers create an incentive to invest in the country. Consequently, when the trade barriers are not significant, TNCs would rather export goods than invest in the host country. From the TNC perspective, the host country's investment policy is the most direct implication of the host country's political environment. The investment policy is a subpolicy of the national economic policy given it has the same ends. The host government may treat FDI as a form of international finance: industrialisation or faster growth creates an increased need for capital. If the domestic investment is not adequate, demand has to be satisfied by outside capital, notably foreign loans, foreign aid, or FDI. Recently, the worldwide share of FDI has increased in comparison to foreign aid and loans. (UNCTAD 1999) At the same time, the competition of FDI has intensified and national governments have to ensure policies that sustain and advance national competitiveness against their foreign competitors, namely the other potential host countries. In order to attract FDI, many 53 host governments have reduced regulations and administrative burdens they earlier imposed on TNCs. The government's control of FDI flows can be justified by various economic arguments, such as the negative impacts of FDI, but also by the need to protect new domestic technologies, the need for protective measures under the restructuring process of an economy, or the need to control foreign capital flows across national boundaries. There are also general political arguments for intervention in FDI, such as national security (protection of critical industries, such as industries related to defence, telecommunications, transportation, or those having a large effect on the balance of payments), and political objectives (harmonising the investment policy to correspond to the agreements with international institutions). After weighing the costs and benefits of FDI, the host government can use various investment policies in intervening in them. Dicken (1998, 97-98) has divided investment policies roughly into four categories including government intervention on 1) entry, 2) operations and 3) transfer of capital of foreign firms, as well as 4) government incentives stimulating FDI. According to this categorisation, government intervention on entry, operations, and transfer of capital are solely restrictive, and the incentives are added to the list more as a curiosity. As government intervention may, however, be supporting as well as restrictive, a categorisation by Lim (2001, 5-7), who discusses interventions in terms of support, restriction, and communicative media, may be more useful. Under these categories, restrictions can be further divided into prior and post-entry restrictions, similar to Dicken (1998, 97-98), as shown in Exhibit 10. Exhibit 10. Types of government intervention in foreign direct investment nvestment support Incentives (eg grants, tax reductions, protection of the market) investment equity,entry Prior to entry restrictions of ownership levels, market entry, ratio of foreign investment equity, entry into certain business sectors, and requirements on a local content level, minimum level of export, technology transfer 54 investment communication media Overseas delegations One-stop service (acting in a proxy position on behalf of a foreign investor) Investment seminars and exhibitions Consulting (advising activities by related institutions such as research institutions, chambers of commerce and industry, legal and accounting firms) Post-entry restrictions on certain authorisations, notifications, registrations, approvals, conditions of establishment related to factory establishment, environmental protection export and import procedures, marketing and procurement, remittance of profits, remittance of capital Honouring foreigninvested firms Follow-up service (monitoring of grievances, ombudsman system) Source: Lim 2001, 5-7; Dicken 1998, 97-98. Encamation and Wells (1985) have noticed that host governments may compete for investment not only by increasing incentives, but also by creating images of an attractive host country. In many cases, the host government has to improve the conditions of the country in order to attract greater volumes of FDI. This can be done by supporting expansion of the domestic market, an increase in productivity, enhancement of the technological infrastructure, natural resource development, activities to promote investment, and the quality of business facilitation. However, Lim (2001, 17) points out that many economic determinants are difficult to improve by the government in the short-run and thus, the role of investment incentives remains significant. Thus, the host government may offer incentives in order to fill the gap between the real locational attractiveness of the country and the degree of expectations by the TNC for a desirable investment location. Investment incentives are the most direct way to impact investment costs and returns of the TNC (Lim 2001,4). Despite the common trust in the incentives, many empirical studies have shown contradictorily that incentives probably play only a marginal role. For example, Yeung 55 (1996, 1998) has shown that the investment incentives do not necessarily increase the inflow of FDI, but they are symbolic commodities, which make an impact only in their absence. In addition, the aim of the host government should not be to attract FDI as such, but to attract FDI that is beneficial to the economy. In the worst case, the costs of the incentives exceed the benefits of the FDI. Therefore, the intangible attitudes of the host government became emphasised over the investment incentives. (Yeung 1996,256; 1998, 703) Accordingly, Kobrin (1982) has argued that managers rank political and administrative concerns as more important than government incentives. Also Lim (2001) has foud that the host government policy objectives can be reached better by providing investment incentives only by negotiations on a case-by-case basis, rather than offering overall incentives for all TNCs. However, there are differences between the host countries, because well-developed consumer markets or the low-cost production sites may be attractive as such without any special investment incentives, while more unattractive economies may need to enhance their locational attractiveness by incentives. A host country associated with instability is not the strongest candidate in the competition for international investment flows and the same is true with an unpredictable investment policy. Despite this, governments do change their investment policies. According to Globerman (1988, 42), the reasons are twofold. Firstly, deteriorating economic conditions may force a government to modify its investment policy in order to encourage short-term inflows of foreign capital both for balance of payments reasons and for a short-term employment consideration. This view suggests that liberalising trends are cyclical in nature and may be reversed when economic conditions improve. Secondly, the perceived net benefits of FDI may have increased, either because of the evidence that FDI has more substantial economic benefits than previously thought or because of a growing belief that restrictions impose net costs on the host country. This view suggests that liberalising trends are long lasting, (ibid.) Investment policies as regional policies. In addition to national economic objectives, the host government may aim to attract FDI in order to promote regional development. Consequently, FDI has an impact on the regional development concerns and economic effects of local scope (Lim 2001,18). The regional aspect of FDI calls for government intervention, which combines the aims of investment policy with regional policy. According to Haggett (1983, 535) there are four approaches to explain how the central government may intervene in order to adjust regional differences within a country. First, the government can 56 pursue a laissez-faire policy with no revenue sharing to poor areas. The second approach is called a special-area strategy, which directs special help to the problem areas. This approach draws near to the growth pole theory, which concentrates investment on selected nodes in order to bring about secondary growth in the hinterlands. In the third strategy, rich areas subsidise poor areas. Finally, the fourth approach, a complete-equalisation strategy, aims at bringing all areas up to the same income level. The major tools of regional policy are 1) investment in the public sector (eg improvement of basic infrastructure), 2) inducements to business in the private sector to invest in a region (eg tax concessions), and 3) inducements to individuals and households to locate in or leave a region (Haggett 1983, 537-538). The distribution of TNCs within a host country is important from the viewpoint of their economic and social impact. In developing countries, the FDI is usually concentrated on the economically most active regions, which usually means either the major urban centres or the Special Economic Zones (SEZs). In developed countries, TNC activities follow industrial activity in general. There, the host governments have often attempted to direct TNCs in high unemployment areas, where TNCs can utilise the labour pool and diminish the unemployment rate. Often this kind of regional policy, however, reinforces prevailing locational advantages rather than directs the location of a TNC. (Dicken 1998,219) By definition, SEZs are industrial complexes, which are selected within a country for a special policy purpose and designed to induce domestic or foreign companies to engage in business activities by providing them with a series of preferred treatment measures. Thus, SEZs are enclaves enjoying a status that does not extend to the whole territory of the country. Usually, they provide some special treatment in terms of production, trade or tax. SEZs have been established for 1) free trade, 2) free export trade, 3) export processing or 4) international investment. The early SEZs were free zones focusing on trade only, while the latter Export Processing Zones (EPZs) were established particularly for production. SEZs have been especially an Asian phenomenon: originally SEZs referred to coastal regions of China, which were established in 1978 along with the open door policy of the Chinese government. Later, EPZs have been established in Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines. To sum up, some investment studies (eg Kobrin 1979, Boddewyn & Brewer 1994) understand the political environment as superior to the economic environment in the 57 hierarchical structure of the environments of the firm (cf. Figure 9) These studies support the idea that it is relevant to study the political environment of the firm separate from the other parts of the firm's external environment. The political environment of the firm can be analysed through the actors and the actions. The host government forms the most important single actor of the political environment of the firm, because it is able to use its power and intervene in FDI. Its role depends not only on the domestic politico-economic conditions but also on the world politico-economic conditions. Its actions towards TNC may be channelled directly through economic policies that may be focused on foreign firms only, or indirectly through overall policies that influence all firms in the host country whether local or foreign. The impact is however not only from the host government to TNC but the TNCs are able to influence the political environment in the host country by negotiating. 2.5.3 Political relations having an impact on international investment Traditionally, the political environment has been understood as a part of the firm's environment, which the firm itself cannot influence. However, in the present study it is supposed that firms do not take locations as given in the form of cost and revenues surfaces (as suggested by the neoclassical approach), or information spaces (as suggested by the behaviourist approach), or in relation to labour (as suggested by the structuralistic approach), but as subject to negotiation, persuasion and bargaing (as suggested by the geography of enterprise approach) (Hayter 1997,161). In addition, it is argued that firms are able to bargain over the location conditions available in the host country. Firms do not only adapt themselves to the environment but can at least partially influence their environment. Stopford et al. (1991) calls the relationships between TNCs and the state as a triangular nexus of interactions comprising power play among state-state, firm-firm, and firm-state relationships. These interactions take place as bargaining among states for power and influence, as competition among firms in the world market, and as specific bargaining between states and firms for the use or creation of wealth-producing resources, (ibid., 32) Starting from state-state relations, diplomatic relations between the home and the host country set the ground for the development of economic relations. For example, after setting diplomatic relations in 1992, trade and investment flows between China and Korea increased within only a few years making them now one of the most important trade and investment partners for each other. 58 Conflicting relations between the host and the home country do not necessarily prevent FDI. For example, Taiwanese firms have invested continuously in mainland China through third countries, especially Hong Kong, in the absence of diplomatic relations. Sometimes, the volume of FDI may be high but affected by political disputes as in the case of Korea and Japan that dispute over the islet of Dokdo. Countries disagree over the fishing rights in their territorial waters, but in Korea the issue often brings up the nationalist sentiments based on memories of Japanese colonialism and on Korea's large trade deficit with Japan. As a result, Korean consumers sometimes simply refuse to consume Japanese products when the Dokdo dispute or other sensitive issues come up. In political economy literature, another form of political interaction in addition to diplomacies has been distinguished, namely transnational relations, which refer to those networks, associations or interactions that cut across countries and link individuals, groups, organisations and communities. These relations do not respect national territorial boundaries but operate beyond direct state control. (McGrew 1992, 5-7) These relations include also the relations between the host government and the TNC. The web of global political interdependencies emphasises the permeability of the nation state to external influences and thus, challenges the traditional distinction between the domestic and the international. Developments abroad may be inserted into the domestic political process and accordingly, local actions may lead to repercussions abroad. (McGrew 1992,14) With regards to firm-state relations, the geography of enterprise approach has incorporated an institutionalist view of investment location, according to which, it understands the location as a subject for bargaining between the firm and the host government. Also in the present study, the investor and the host government are in a bargaining relation, but this relation as such is beyond the actual scope of the study. A TNC - host government relation includes bargaining because the parties have different interests. These interests may be conflicting, negotiable, or complementary (Gregersen & Contreras 1975, 48-51). The TNC's economic diplomacy aims at getting access to attractive factors of production, financial incentives, and acceptable levels of political risks. At the same time, the host government negotiates for investment, the transfer of technology, exports, and employment, among others. With regard to conflicting issues, there are a large number of studies on TNC - host government bargains over FDI (eg Gregersen & Contreras 59 1975, Bradley 1977, Doz & Prahalad 1980, Poynter 1982, Lecraw 1984, Goodman 1987, Kobrin 1987, Moon & Lado 2000). These studies have emphasised the firm-specific and industry-specific sources of bargaining power, but the discussion on country-specific sources has remained scarce. The country-specific sources of bargaining power refer to a TNCs ability to manage the political imperative, as Moon and Lado (2000) have called it. The topic has been studied explicitly in the context of international investment by Poynter (1982), who has argued that investors seeking out influential politicians or senior civil servants in the host country enjoy less intervention than the other investors. The role of firm-state relations is subject to change during the investment project. Lieberthal and Lieberthal (2003) divide a single direct investment project into three: entry, country development, and global interaction phases. In the entry phase, the manager of the host country unit has to develop influential contacts in the host country, but not only at the firm level with local partners, but also at the national level with the host government officials and politicians. With the help of these contacts, TNC may negotiate incentives and other beneficial conditions for the investment. In the country development phase, frequent contacts of top corporate officials with the host government are crucial in order to initiate new operations. They are also needed to continue the privileged treatment, because once the investment is made, the firm's power to protect the investment erodes. Large fixed costs become sunk and technology installed. By the time, as the subsidiary is operating successfully, the host government may see the original terms as overgenerous. (Goodman 1987, 120). Finally, in the global interaction phase, the main emphasis of TNC turns from the host country efforts to full integration of operations into the TNC's regional and global efforts. However, good relations with host government should be still maintained in order to avoid any discriminating requirements or the end of the relationship. If the TNC has integrated to the host country and provides benefits in the form of exports or employment, for example, conflicts are unlikely. If the studies on country-specific sources of bargaining power in terms of the host country have remained scarce, they are even rarer in terms of the home country. Hayter (1997, 288) has pointed out that a TNC may increase its bargaining power by lobbying help from its home government. Usually the demand for help comes from the TNC, but it is also possible that the initiation comes from the home government, which encourages the TNC to invest in a certain project or a particular host country (Goodman 1987, 23). In the present study, this kind of help is called authority services, and it refers to the public means to promote internationalisation of the home country industries. Authority services include the services 60 of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, high-level business delegations preferably led by the President or the Minister, meetings and seminars chaired by the Ambassador or Commercial attache, and various kinds of supportive measures by trade centres and other public institutions. The home government, which believes that international operations of the TNCs have economic benefits for the home country, tends to adopt a liberal outward investment policy and promote internationalisation of the TNCs by providing a range of authority services. It is likely to offer authority services especially for the investment projects taking place in the host countries with which the home government has good and stable relations. Probably, the need for authority services is highest in the case of authoritarian host countries where the personal relations in the most high level settings may be crucial even for a rather modest single investment project. In addition to TNC's negotiations with the home and host governments, the bargaining may also be extended to the intra-national level, if the local government is allowed to take it upon themselves to encourage foreign investment (Korhonen 2001, 118). Beyond the national level, Dent (1999, 11) has also pointed out that the TNC may even lobby help from a regional block. For example, a European company that has invested in an East Asian country may request the EU to remove some tariffs that are carried against the products that the TNC produces in East Asia and exports to the EU market. To sum up, the above-mentioned state-state relations have been studied widely in the field of political economy and the firm-firm relations in the field of international business. The firm-state relations that are emphasised by the geography of enterprise approach have been studied to a lesser degree. The studies have shown that the TNCs are able to manage the political imperative related to politico-economic institutions and systems in the host country, but they may need to build a special policy towards the host government that is able to intervene in entry, operations, and exit of the TNC. However, the negotiations with the host government are not the only way to increase the TNC's bargaining power but it may also lobby help from its home government, a fact that has gained relatively little attention in earlier literature. Finally, the earlier studies on TNC - host government relations give an additional support for using Lahti's strategy-performance model in the context of FDI. There are namely studies on the bargaining power of the TNCs that utilise a very similar setting to the present 61 study, such as Moon and Lado (2002). However, as their study belongs to the resourcebased research tradition, they emphasise firm-specific resources and capabilities over the host country characteristics. In the present study, the fit between the firm-specific and country-specific factors is pursued and thus, the holistic strategy-performance model is found more suitable. 2.5.4 Summary: The role of the political environment for the firm's investment decision This chapter has discussed the second research task that aims to identify what is the relative importance of the political environment of the firm among the other relevant factors having an impact on the firm's investment decision. In the introductory part of the present study, it was noticed that industrial geography does not take any specific view of the political environment and thus, the political environment was discussed only through the broader concept of the firm's environment (cf. Table 2). The geography of enterprise approach understands the environment of the firm as a network among the TNC and the external institutions, such as the foreign units of the TNC, subcontractors, rivals, host governments, and others (cf. Table 3). However, it does not state any specific view of the role of the political environment of the firm in relation to other parts of the firm's environment. In Lahti's (1987) strategy-performance model, the political environment of the firm is part of the firm's general macro-environment. The comparison of different parts of the firm's environment produces a note that when applying the model to FDI studies, the contents of the environments that have originally been defined in terms of marketing, has to be enlarged to cover conditions relevant to FDI. However, the model as such gives no reason to highlight the role of the political environment in relation to other elements of the general macro-environment. Some investment studies (eg Kobrin 1979, Boddewyn & Brewer 1994) argue that the political environment is superior at least to the economic environment within the hierarchical structure of the environments of the firm (cf. Figure 9). Also some studies in the field of economics understand political systems constraining all other actors in the economy by building the legal institution (eg Jwa 2002, 168). Therefore, it is justified to study the political environment separate from the other environments of the firm. 62 TNCs may interpret the changes in the host country's political environment as a positive, negative, or inconsequential factor, depending on their strategies. These perceptions can be studied by using the modified strategy-performance model. In the original strategyperformance model, the firm cannot have a direct impact on its general macro-environment, including the political environment, although it is able to affect the competitive environment to some extent. Differently, according to the geography of enterprise research tradition, firms take locations as subject to negotiation, persuasion and bargaining (Hayter 1997, 161). Firms do not only adapt themselves to the environment but can at least partially influence it. Also some investment studies in the fields of the geography of enterprise and international business have placed attention on the TNC -host government bargaining (eg Gregersen & Contreras 1975, Bradley 1977, Doz & Prahalad 1980, Poynter 1982, Lecraw 1984, Goodman 1987, Kobrin 1987, Moon & Lado 2000). Most of these studies have highlighted the firm-specific and industry-specific sources of the bargaining power of the TNC, while the discussion on country-specific sources has remained scarce. In the present study, the relation of the firm and its home government is incorporated into the triangular relationships of the firm-firm, the state-state, and the firm-state, which have been introduced by Stopford et al. (1991). As shown in Exhibit 11, the relation between the TNC and its home government is manifested by the authority services provided by the home government to TNC in its efforts to internationalise through outward investment. Altogether, the firm has many, at least indirect ways to influence its political environment in the host country. Exhibit 11. Relations of a political nature in the context of international investment 63 Note: TNC has to integrate the foreign unit with itself in the case of M&A. In the case of a greenfield investment, a foreign unit is built from scratch. In conclusion, the discussion on the second research task of the study leads first to the argument that as there is some disagreement in the literature on the role of the firm's political environment in relation to other parts of the firm's environment, a further analysis of this issue is needed. The present study argues that it is justified to study the political environment of the firm separately. The importance of the political environment of the firm is rooted in the use of political power of the host government to intervene in FDI. Secondly, the present study argues that TNCs are able to influence at least their political environment. They can affect their host government not only by bargaining but also by lobbying help from their home government in the form of authority services. 2.6 Summary of the Literature review The attraction of foreign direct investment to a developing economy depends upon a combination of social, political and economic factors, some of which are under the control of host governments while others are not. Those which are not are as follows: the determinants of foreign expansion of firms in developed countries, such as the growth of oligopoly, technological change, competitive and marketing strategies, cost pressures; the size and the rate of growth of the host economy (only indirectly controlled, if at all, by host government policy); political and social (including labor) stability in the host country (again, only indirectly controlled by host governments); and the economic, social and political conditions in the home economies of the TNCs (Lall and Streeten, 1989). It was shown that most prior studies on strategic decision-making processes do not distinguish between the types of market that the company intends to operate in. It was shown, however, that emerging markets differ significantly from stable markets. This research therefore will fill the gap in the literature brought about by the lack of focus on this difference. The result of this study should be a model based on past findings from the areas of general strategic decision process research, FDI decision-making process research, and related fields. It adds to this existing knowledge significant new insight from a relatively large-scale field research effort. 64 This study aims to make a contribution to the FDI theory. The study is positioned to the field of economic geography, and the geography of enterprise research tradition in particular, as shown in Exhibit 12. Therefore, the starting point for theorising about FDI lies in the basic statements of the geography of enterprise literature on FDI and related concepts. In order to build a theoretical framework, the key ideas of the geography of enterprise approach have been discussed in previous chapters in a dialogue with strategic management, international business, and political economy literatures. The major arguments of the present study are collected to Exhibit 12 in the next page. Exhibit 12. Positioning of the present study The first research task, which aims to uncover a model that recognises the relevant factors that have an impact on the investment decisions of TNCs, was answered in Chapter Two with the help of a strategy-performance model developed gradually by Lahti (1983,1985, 1987) from the basis of Ansoffian strategic management. The model was modified by incorporating the general macro-environment of the firm explicitly to the model. In the current study, it is argued, similar to the strategic management literature, that the firm makes its investment decision by combining the information on its internal factors with its information on the external environment, hi other words, TNC is motivated to invest by a stimulus both from its external environment and from its organisation. In addition, the country-specific factors have an impact on the firm's internal factors (resources, target market, logistics, marketing) and finally on the performance of the firm. Thus, the firm interprets the location conditions of the host country into a special set of location factors, 65 which are crucial from its strategy perspective. With the help of the modified strategyperformance model, the firm's relative optimal location can be explained by linking the location of the firm to the purposes of the firm: the firm invests where it can operate successfully. Exhibit 13. Theoretical building blocks of the present study The aim was to identify what is the importance of the political environment of the firm among the relevant factors that were defined with the help of the strategy-performance model. As a result, it is argued that there is theoretical evidence of the specific role of the political environment of the firm among the other elements of the firm's environment (eg Kobrin 1979, Boddewyn & Brewer 1994, Jwa 2002). The importance of the political environment of the firm is based on the ability of the host government to use its political power in order to intervene in FDI. 66 However, TNCs may influence the host government by using their bargaining power. The present study argues also that the TNCs may increase their bargaining power by lobbying help from their home governments, which may provide authority services for them. The research problem of the present study asks how the TNCs perceive and react to the change in their political environment in the host country when making the investment decisions. Therefore, the political environment of the firm has to be studied separately from the rest of the firm's general macro-environment (viz. Exhibit 14). Operationalisation of the elements will be discussed in Chapter Six on methodology. Exhibit 14. Relevant elements having an impact on the firm's investment decision Source: Modified fromLahti 1987,49. 67 The modified strategy-performance model takes account of various aspects of the risk in achieving the firm's goals. The strategic risk arises from the accuracy of the investment decision: is it a correct decision to invest in particular host country in order to enhance the firm's objectives? The risk is high if the firm's strategy has high reliance on some internal resource that is not currently in place or will be difficult to acquire. Accordingly, the operational risk is high if, for example, the logistics is not functioning or if the firm fails to use marketing communication that fits in with the local culture. Finally, the environmental risk is high if the firm is reliant on some factor or future event in the host country that is highly uncertain or beyond the firm's direct influence. (Atkinson 2004) As the study focuses on realised investment cases, it is obvious that the investors have already found the selected host country as a place where location conditions fulfil the basic requirements of the firm that are critical in order to implement the firm strategy. In addition, the investors have found the host country as a place where all the necessary interactions with the market can be maintained on a competitive basis. Investors have also selected a site within the area. (cf. Nishioka & Krumme 1973, 204-205). Using the terminology of the strategy-performance model, the firms focus on the match of the firm's resources with its external environment. In order to explain the specific importance of the host country for the individual firms, location factors have to be analysed. This analysis can be done only firm by firm. Thus, the general setting of the study is built to compare investment decisions of the TNCs in a particular host country before and after a certain change in the political environment of the firm, as illustrated in Exhibit 15. 68 Exhibit 15. The framework of the study The present study penetrates all the levels typical of FDI studies: macroeconomic, mesoeconomic, microeconomic, and milli-microeconomic levels. Starting from the macrolevel, the setting of the study in the home country versus host country position represents the macroeconomic perspective interested in national trends of FDI. The importance of location conditions to the group of firms, or the intra-national distribution of FDI, is typical of the mesoeconomic perspective. The emphasis on the TNCs resource deployment and location factors represents the microeconomic perspective interested in the competitive advantage of the firm. Finally, studying a firm's single investment project is a subject typical of the millimicroeconomic perspective. Methodologically, the focus on the changing political environment calls for a longitudinal analysis. However, an analysis of the FDI flows as a whole in a particular host country, where the political environment of the firm has been under change, is not possible if also the internal factors of every single investor are to be included. Thus, the scope of the study has to be more focused and in the present study, Korea is chosen as the host country. In the 69 empirical part of the study, the location conditions of Korea are first discussed on the basis of traditional regional geography, which puts an emphasis on description. This part explains the conditions in the host country in which TNCs in general are interested in: a distinctive combination of location conditions that a country can offer to potential investors, and a national policy framework by which the host government can compensate for possible deficiencies in location conditions. The World Bank defines foreign direct investment as: "an investment involving a long-term relationship and reflecting a lasting interest and control of a resident entity in one economy (foreign direct investor or parent enterprise) in an enterprise resident in an economy other than that of the foreign direct investor (FDI enterprise or affiliate enterprise or foreign affiliate). Foreign direct investment implies that the investor exerts a significant degree of influence on the management of the enterprise resident in the other economy. Such investment involves both the initial transaction between the two entities and all subsequent transactions between them and among foreign affiliates, both incorporated and unincorporated. Foreign direct investment may be undertaken by individuals as well as business entities." (World Development Report 1998/99 p.219). FDI occurs "when an investor, based in one country (the home country), acquires an asset in another country (the host country), with the intent to manage that asses" (WTO 1996). The management of the asset is what distinguishes direct investment from portfolio investment, such as stocks and other financial instruments. In 1983, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) suggested that FDI takes place when there is a holding of 10 percent (or more) of the shares or voting stock. A holding below the 10 percent level refers to the portfolio investment. However, a legally required level that distinguishes the FDI from the portfolio investment varies by country: a 20 percent benchmark exists for the UK and France, 10 percent for the US and Japan, and 25 percent for Germany (WTO 1996). This review will discuss those parts of the strategic decision process literature, FDI literature, that were most relevant to the research project. 70 3 OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT 3.1 The General Reform Environment 3.1.1 Political Environment Kazakhstan is a presidential republic with many political parties, a two-chamber parliament and a network of non-governmental organisations. Strong presidential power is not adequately balanced by the legislature and the judiciary. In the past two years the country has undergone two sets of elections - parliamentary and presidential. As Kazakhstan has expressed interest in the Chairmanship of the OSCE in 2009, these elections were seen as an opportunity to demonstrate commitment to democracy. According to international observers, both elections showed some improvement but fell short of international standards for democratic elections in many respects. In December 2005 Nursultan Nazarbayev won the presidential election with an overwhelming majority of 91 per cent of the votes and secured another seven-year term in office. The succession issue will be impacting political developments in the years ahead. By the end of 2006 the OSCE will be deciding on the candidacy of Kazakhstan as Chairmanship of the organisation in 2009. In this context, any progress in crucial areas such as freedom of the media, the ability of political parties to operate freely and respect for individual human rights would be essential elements in the decision. The country's leadership announced the Government's strategy for becoming one of the world's 50 most competitive countries (Kazakhstan is currently ranking 56th). This strategic vision includes not only important economic aspects but also a strong commitment to democratic principles. However, the latest amendments to the Media Law raised concerns as representing a setback for media freedom in the country. Externally, the country is doing well by successfully pursuing a multi-dimensional foreign policy aimed at maintaining balanced relations with all its neighbours. A known proponent of regional co-operation, Kazakhstan is active in many regional organisations, including the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) of which the country has taken over Chairmanship this year. 71 3.1.2 Regional Issues As a land-locked country with a substantial endowment of mineral resources but with a relatively small size of the domestic market, regional issues primarily concern trade and transit matters. Other important regional issues concern resource management issues such as water-energy trade and establishment of water boundaries among the five littoral countries of the Caspian Sea. In order to address these issues, Kazakhstan has been actively seeking both bilateral and multilateral co-operation with its regional neighbours. In recent years, co-operation has intensified with Russia and China, the two largest regional neighbours, regarding exploration of natural resources, transit and export issues. Russia remains an important transit country for Kazakhstan's exports to the EU. It is also the largest trading partner accounting for 22 per cent of total trade in 2005. In June 2006, Kazakhstan and Russia reached an agreement for a joint development of the Kurmangazy oil and gas field, a large field located at the disputed Caspian water boundary between the two countries. The countries also agreed to establish a joint venture to expand existing gas processing plant in Orenburg, Russia for the processing of gas supplied from the Karachaganak field in Kazakhstan. The two countries have jointly established Eurasian Development Bank (EDB) which has an authorised capital of US$ 1.5 billion, is two-thirds owned by the Government of Russia and one-third by Kazakhstan, and will provide finances to the members of Eurasian Economic Community (EurAsEC). China is quickly becoming an important trading partner, already accounting for 15 per cent of total trade. In recent years, Chinese state-owned oil companies have increased investment in Kazakhstan's hydrocarbon sector through the acquisition of stakes sold by Western investors. Kazakhstan has secured an important oil export route to the east when the AtasuAlashankou oil pipeline, the first pipeline linking Kazakhstan with China, opened in July 2006. In order to facilitate cross-border trade, the construction of a free trade zone at the Khorgos border began in 2006. Co-operation with other regional neighbours has also improved. Kazakhstan is one of the key foreign direct investors in the Kyrgyz Republic, especially in the banking sector. However, there has been no concrete breakthrough on the issue of water-energy trade to avoid the release of water by the Kyrgyz Republic during the winter months which cause 72 floods in Kazakhstan. Relations with Uzbekistan have also improved with the reopening of a rail link between Almaty and Tashkent. In the Caucasus, Kazakhstan has officially secured a western route for oil and gas exports by reaching an agreement with Azerbaijan on the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil and gas pipeline project. Kazakhstan is also becoming an important foreign direct investor in Georgia. Kazakhstan is an active member of various regional security and economic organisations including Central Asian Co-operation Organisation (CACO), EurAsEC, CIS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) and the Single Economic Space. The effectiveness of these regional organisations in addressing regional economic issues has so far been limited. CACO members have agreed to merge this organisation with EurAsEC when Uzbekistan joined EurAsEC in 2006. 3.1.3 Social conditions Robust economy in recent years has improved overall social conditions of the country. Per capita income at current prices has increased from US$ 1,132 in 1999 to US$ 3,813 in 2006. The percentage of population living below the subsistence minimum income declined from 19.8 per cent in 2003 to 9.8 per cent in 2006. Life expectancy at birth increased from 64.4 years in 1999 to 66.7 years in 2005. School gross enrolment rate increased from 93.3 per cent in 2003 to 95.4 per cent in 2006. Labour market conditions are also improving with unemployment declining from 13.5 per cent and 8.8 per cent in 1999 and 2003, respectively to 8.1 per cent in 2006. The Gini co-efficient2 has declined from 0.315 in 2003 to 0.304 in 2006 indicating that there has been a slight decline in the extent of inequality during the period. Despite these positive developments, availability of qualified skilled labour, and of basic infrastructure (drinking water, sewage systems, health and education services) are a major problem for Kazakhstan. There are also important regional disparities. The degree of variation in terms of income, poverty incidence, unemployment, social sectors (health and education) and infrastructure. The extent of variation is measured by the coefficient of variation, a statistical measure of variance defined as standard deviation divided by the mean and the higher the coefficient, the higher the degree of regional variation. The largest degree of variation within Kazakhstan is found in poverty incidence, access to health service and several essential 73 infrastructure services such as sewerage, clean water and central heating. The lower variation is found in unemployment, gross school enrolment rate and access to electricity supply. It is difficult to explain the reasons for regional divergence, but it is clear that the effect of transition within Kazakhstan has been uneven. Bringing the benefits of strong economic growth to the regions has become an important transition challenge. 3.1.4 Environment Kazakhstan's national priorities and commitments are stated in its National Environmental Action Plan, National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan and Conception of Environmental Safety for 2004-2015, approved by Presidential Decree on 03 December 2003. The main areas of concern are the Aral Sea, the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Testing Area, desertification and land degradation, biodiversity protection, forestation in East Kazakhstan and in Pavlodar and Karaganda Oblasts. Environmental issues associated with exploitation of natural resources are connected with the intensive development of the Caspian Sea oil shelf. Metallurgical industries and power generation cause significant air pollution, resulting in eight of the ten mostly contaminated cities being Balkhash, Temirtau, Ekibastuz, Aksu, Pavlodar, Zhezkazgan and UstKamenogorsk. Surface water protection programmes concentrate on Irtysh, Ili, Syrdarya, Ishim, Tobol, Ural, Turgai, Chu rivers, Balkhash Lake, and the Caspian and Aral seas. Soil and groundwater protection programmes are under consideration. Industrial and domestic waste disposal is a countrywide problem and special attention is needed for radioactive waste management at Semipalatinsk and Karachaganak. 3.1.5 Legal While in recent years Kazakhstan has introduced notable reforms to its legal system, the country continues to face considerable challenges in entrenching the rule of law and related institutions upon which its successful transition to a market-orientated economy will depend. 74 Kazakh commercial laws have improved significantly in recent years and are considered on a par with many other CIS countries. The improvements in recent years extend to securities legislation (including the creation of new unified financial sector regulator in 2004), concessions (in particular the adoption of the new concessions law in 2006) and insolvency (including the 2006 amendments to insolvency legislation). However, Kazakh commercial laws still fall short in certain respects of standards that are generally acceptable internationally. It should be noted that Kazakhstan remains one of the Bank's countries of operation that is yet to approve and implement the AML and anti-terrorist financing laws. An analysis of key commercial laws that contribute directly to creating a favourable investment climate in Kazakhstan, such as secured transactions, bankruptcy laws, and regulation of financial markets, shows that even relatively good laws often suffer from poor implementation. This implementation gap both undermines the utility of the specific laws in issue and diminishes the confidence that both Kazakhstan and foreign investors and traders have in the legal system as a whole, in particular in its ability to uphold contractual rights. Kazakhstan's poor record of upholding political freedom and civil liberties is also of concern, given the continuing large and unchanging gap between the adoption of new laws and their effective implementation. The President constitutionally holds a vast amount of power, not only over the legislative, but also over the executive branch. The judiciary as well remains under the control of the President and the executive branch. There is a concern that the level of the country's economic progress is not matched by similar progress in legal reform. Because of the inter-dependence of these two pillars of transition, and given that experience has shown that in transition countries these pillars are mutually reinforcing, Kazakhstan will only be able to maximise its long-term economic potential provided its efforts to advance economically are matched by a commitment to legal reform. The FIC, set up in 2000 as a consultative body comprising major foreign investors in the region and chaired by the President, shapes further improvements to the legislative environment. As such the Legal Working Group of the FIC has successfully contributed to the strengthening of judicial independence (e.g. increase of judges' salary, reforms aimed at independence of judiciary from local authorities, etc.), creation of Specialized Economic Courts, and drafting laws on maritime, investment, arbitration, etc. The challenge facing Kazakhstan in 2006 and beyond is to further enhance the quality and competence of the 75 judiciary, tackle corruption, upgrade its commercial laws to standards that are generally acceptable internationally and make those laws fully effective through a strengthening of the court system and the rule of law. 3.2 Progress in Transition and the Economy's Response 3.2.1 Macroeconomic conditions for Bank operations The economy has remained robust during the strategy period. Fiscal prudence has been underpinned by further accumulation of assets by the NFRK - a vehicle to save and invest part of fiscal revenues abroad when commodity prices are high. Monetary policy is based on inflation targeting but, in recent years, the rate of inflation overshot policy target rates. As a natural resource based economy, medium and long-term macroeconomic challenge is to adopt an appropriate policy mix that will maintain the diversification of the economy and insulate itself from commodity price volatility. Recent tightening of regulations in the financial sector to restrain externally financed credit growth should relieve pressure on the foreign exchange and decelerate the growth in domestic demand. However, further strengthening of banking regulation is needed as the sector is increasingly vulnerable to shocks. Fiscal policy should also move towards non-oil revenue deficit targeting and consider tightening if inflationary pressures persist. Real economy: The economy grew by 9.6 per cent in 2004, 9.4 per cent in 2005 and 9.4 per cent in the first half of 2006. The share of hydrocarbon sector has remained at around 15 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2003 prices as growth was primarily driven by the non-oil sector. The income and wealth effects from high oil prices have benefited the nonoil sector - the construction and financial services sector in particular, while real growth in hydrocarbon output slowed due to constraints in export capacity. The rate of unemployment has declined steadily from 8.8 per cent in 2003 to 8.1 per cent in 2005. However, as the domestic demand has been boosted by strong credit growth and higher public expenditures on pensions and public sector wages, inflationary pressure in the economy rose. Consumer price inflation picked up from 6.4 per cent in 2003 to 7.6 per cent in 2005 and exceeded 8 per cent by June 2006. Policy target for inflation was in the range of 4.9-6.5 per cent in 2006. 76 Economic policies: The general government surplus widened in recent years (reaching 6 per cent of GDP in 2005) while accommodating a sharp increase in fiscal expenditures on pensions and public sector wages as well as various tax cuts. Rising oil prices have boosted revenues from the oil sector which increased from 6 per cent of GDP in 2003 to 7 per cent and 11 per cent in 2004 and 2005 respectively. NFRK had accumulated US$ 8 billion (14 per cent of GDP) by the end of 2005 and US$ 11.5 billion by 31 August 2006. The budget for 2006 projects the overall fiscal position as a percentage of GDP to remain similar to that of 2005 and fiscal surplus of 5.6 per cent of GDP is expected in 2006. In July 2006, the NFRK was fully integrated with the budget. Under this new arrangement, all oil revenues will accrue to the NFRK which will then transfer part of the funds to finance investment and programmes for human capital development. The new arrangement should improve fiscal management through targeting of budget deficit excluding oil revenues. Monetary policy primarily focused on stemming inflationary pressure through monetary tightening and by allowing nominal appreciation of the Tenge against the US dollar. Bank lending primarily funded through external borrowing increased sharply and domestic credit outstanding more than tripled between 2003 and 2005. The NBK gradually increased the refinancing rate from 7 per cent at the end of 2003 to 9 per cent by July 2006, and extended the coverage of liabilities for which banks were required to provide minimum reserves. Higher reserve requirements for foreign liabilities compared to domestic liabilities were also introduced in 2006 in order to stem the growth of external borrowing by commercial banks. The NBK also allowed the Tenge to appreciate against the US Dollar in nominal terms in the first half of 2006 through less intervention in the foreign exchange market. Real effective exchange rate appreciated by 23 per cent between end-2003 and mid-2006. External sector: The current account recorded a small deficit of 1 per cent of GDP in 2005. A record trade balance surplus of 18 per cent of GDP due to high commodity prices was more than offset by a sharp increase in income payments associated with FDI in the hydrocarbon sector and an increase in imports of services, also linked to investments in the hydrocarbon sector. The current account returned to surplus during the first quarter of 2006. International reserves and NFRK assets amounted to US$ 22 billion, more than 9 months of imports of goods and services at the end of first half of 2006. Total external debt as a percentage of GDP remained constant at 74 per cent in 2005. While the share of intercompany loans associated with FDI in the hydrocarbons sector in total debt declined, the 77 external liabilities of Kazakh banks increased and accounted for 36 per cent of total external debt at end-2005. 3.2.2 Transition success and transition challenges The previous strategy highlighted the importance of a diversified economic structure which will be resilient to oil price fluctuations in line with the objectives of "Industrial-Innovation Development Strategy of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2003-2015" and the challenge to develop a competitive private sector. In the strategy period, the authorities have demonstrated a great capacity for institutional innovation and adaptation, e.g. through the establishment of the two state holding companies Samruk and Kazyna. While acknowledging the potential of these initiatives to contribute to sustainable development, the difficulties and risks should also be recognised. Institutional experience is not easily transferred across countries and, once established, dysfunctional organisations are not easily phased out. In the forthcoming strategy period, the authorities should continue to focus on addressing challenges identified in the previous strategy: • Reduce bureaucratic red tape, address the issue of corruption and create fair and competitive environment for businesses in order to foster innovation and entrepreneurship; • Increase openness to foreign trade and investment in order to strengthen competition and competitiveness of enterprises; • Improve corporate governance of enterprises in order to enhance access to longterm debt and equity capital; • Attract private sector investment in infrastructure services in order to reduce infrastructure bottlenecks and narrow inter-regional gaps in service quality. Progress in transition. Kazakhstan has made some progress and continues to be a lead reformer in the CIS (Exhibit 16). However, reform efforts have clearly lagged behind advanced transition economies in Central and Eastern Europe and the Baltic States (CEEB). In the past two years, progress was most noticeable in the deepening of structure and the extent of provision of market services in infrastructure sub-sectors (telecommunications and railways) as well as in securities markets andNBFIs. 78 Exhibit 16. Reform progress in Kazakhstan, compared to CIS and CEEB Source: EBRD Transition Report 2006 • Market liberalisation and small-scale privatisation: Kazakhstan has reached close to the level of advanced market economies in early years of transition. However, it is yet to become a member of the WTO and the key challenge is to accelerate the accession process. This will not only improve access to world markets, which is particularly important for non-oil and gas sectors, but also improve the investment climate for potential foreign investors as it will demonstrate the country's commitment to international rules and obligations. • Financial sector reforms: Kazakhstan has been one of the most advanced reformers in the banking sector in the CIS with the strongest regulatory and supervisory frameworks. In order to curb rapid loan growth predominantly financed by external funding in recent years, reserve requirements has been tightened to increase the costs of external borrowing by banks. Regulation on open foreign currency position has also been tightened. Consolidated supervision was introduced to improve regulatory oversight over related party loans and further efforts are being made to improve ownership transparency of commercial banks. 79 However, as the sector is increasingly vulnerable to shocks, the key challenge is to further strengthen regulation and supervision with a focus on risk management. In securities markets and non-bank financial sector, the regulatory framework is generally in line with international standards, and the challenge is to further strengthen the enforcement capacity of the regulator to ensure rigorous disclosure standards are adopted in practice. Pension legislation should also be modified in order to allow more flexibility in asset allocation. • Large scale privatisation, enterprise restructuring and competition policy: Progress in reform has been relatively slow in the enterprise sector. Large-scale privatisation has been put on hold for some time. Recently, a national holding company, Samruk, was established in order to improve the governance of largescale state-owned companies. It is expected that the holding company, the supervisory board of which consists of independent members as well as government representatives, will be more effective in managing state-owned companies. Improvement in corporate governance and transparency of private enterprises has been limited to date, although all joint stock companies are now required to produce their financial statements in accordance with IFRS and also to appoint independent directors to their respective boards. The successful raising of capital through IPO in the overseas market by several Kazakh companies could lead to more companies seeking such avenues to raise long-term funding, improving governance and transparency in the process. The least progress was made in the competition policy. A new competition law that became effective in July 2006 raised the threshold of asset and share acquisitions which require prior approval by the competition authorities. The new law also set a unified definition of a dominant position - a company with a share in the relevant market exceeding 35 per cent. While the new law will relieve small and medium enterprises from ex-ante regulatory approval, given that an increasing number of enterprises perceived anti-competitive behaviour to be an obstacle for businesses (see below), further changes in the legal framework are required in order to promote new business entry and ease exit. • Reforms of infrastructure: In infrastructure, progress has been mixed. While overall regulatory framework for network infrastructure tariffs setting has improved, the extent of market liberalisation and new entry has differed across 80 infrastructure sub-sectors. The most advanced is the electric power sector followed by railways and telecommunications. The least advanced is water and waste water and road sectors. The extent of regional divergence in access to infrastructure services may be explained by the extent of reforms in infrastructure with less regional divergence in those sectors where reforms are more advanced (electricity and telecommunications). It is important that further efforts are made to advance road sector and municipal infrastructure reforms. In the former, key challenges are to prioritise investment and to separate regulatory functions from project planning and execution functions which could facilitate private sector participation. In the latter, the revenue raising and project implementation capacity of local governments to undertake investment programmes need to be strengthened. Investment climate. The development of investment climate in recent years has been mixed. The table below (Exhibit 17) is based on EBRD/WB BEEPS and it shows a percentage of firms reporting a minor, moderate or major problem in a number of dimensions that affected businesses in Kazakhstan in 2002 and 2006. Business environment as perceived by surveyed firms has improved in some areas but deteriorated in others. The deterioration was most pronounced in access and title/leasing of land, availability of skilled workers and labour legislation, and anticompetitive practices. 81 Exhibit 17. Problems in the Business Environment Source: EBRD/WB BEEPS 2002 & 2006 The WB's Doing Business ranking of Kazakhstan also provides a mixed picture. While the overall ranking has improved from 82nd place among 175 economies in 2005 to 63rd in 2006, this was largely because of a significant improvement in access to credit. In areas such as dealing with licenses, trading across borders and closing a business, businesses in Kazakhstan incur significantly more time and costs compared to other countries in the survey. 82 Kazakhstan has taken steps to enhance transparency of revenues that accrue from oil and gas sectors. In 2006, the country has officially endorsed the principles of the EITI. The objective of the initiative is to ensure that contractual payments reported by companies match revenues received by the Government. A memorandum of understanding was signed by various stakeholders, including the Government and 28 companies in October 2006. Under this initiative, all revenue flows from oil, gas and mining companies to the Government will be disclosed to the public. According to BEEPS, corruption is regarded as more of a problem in 2006 compared to 2002 (Exhibit 16). However, the quantitative survey in BEEPS indicates that corruption has declined both in terms of frequency and level. The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) score of Kazakhstan published by Transparency International (on a scale ranging from 10 to 0, 0 being highly corrupt) increased from 2.2 in 2004 to 2.6 in 2006, indicating a perception of decreased prevalence of corruption. These results may reflect the effectiveness of anticorruption measures introduced in 2003 when amended anti-corruption law was adopted and a new Agency for Fighting Economic and Corruption Crimes was established. There has been little progress in enhancing the transparency of financial interests of public sector officials who are in positions where there could be conflicts of interest with their private interests. The investment climate for foreign investors has generally remained stable in the past two years although regulatory changes have strengthened the state's control over the oil and gas sector. FDI remains predominantly directed towards oil and gas and related service industries. However, reflecting relative shortage of supply, FDI began to flow into nontradable sectors such as wholesale and retail trade, utilities and the financial sector. This is positive both from the perspectives of knowledge and skill transfers and maintaining a diversified economy. In order to further attract FDI in non-oil and gas sectors, early accession to the WTO is imperative as it will demonstrate the country's willingness to commit to international rules and obligations. 3.3 Access to Capital and Investment Requirements Kazakhstan's access to capital has improved substantially in the past two years. Reflecting buoyant economy underpinned by high commodity prices and prudent macroeconomic 83 policies, all international credit rating agencies rate Kazakhstan's sovereign foreign currency rating at investment grade. It is currently rated "BBB-" by Standard & Poor's, "Baa3" by Moody's and "BBB+" by Fitch. Although the Government has not raised funds from international capital markets in recent years and adopted a policy of repaying maturing debt instead of refinancing them, improvement in sovereign credit rating had beneficial spillovers on the credit ratings of domestic banks and corporates. In the past two years, Kazakh issuers (primarily domestic banks and state-owned companies in natural resources and infrastructure sectors) have raised over US$ 6 billion in international capital markets with maturities of up to 20 years. Major banks (KKB, BTA, BCC and Alliance Bank) were also able to raise a total of US$ 750 million in perpetual bonds that would count as their capital base. Similarly, access to international loan markets has also improved raising more than US$ 7 billion in the past two years. The tenor available in the syndicated market has also lengthened with KKB, BTA and BCC raising syndicated loan for up to 3 years. The pricing of BTA's 3-year syndicated loan raised in September 2006 was 65 basis points over London inter-bank offered rate (Libor). Several Kazakh private companies were also successful in raising equity capital through overseas listing in 2005. Kazakhmys, a copper mining company, raised £600 million through an IPO on the LSE and was subsequently included in the FTSE 100 index of leading shares. KazakhGold, a gold mining company, raised US$ 196.5 million through an IPO of GDRs, also on the LSE. In October 2006, KazMunaiGas Exploration and Production, a subsidiary of KazMunaiGas (a national oil and gas company) raised over US$ 2 billion through IPO in London and Almaty. Further IPO plans have been made by other Kazakh companies and banks to boost their equity base. Kazakhstan continues to attract one of the highest levels of FDI per capita in the CIS countries. FDI remains predominantly directed towards the oil and gas industries. However, in recent years, non-tradable sectors such as business services - predominantly related to oil and gas sector, wholesale and retail trade, utilities and financial sector have been attracting more investments. 84 Exhibit 18. Sectoral Distribution of gross FDI Source: National Bank of Kazakhstan 85 3.4. Investment Opportunities in Central Asia and Transcaucasus Economic development of the newly independent states of Central Asia and the Transcaucasus, their regional interaction, and cooperation with Russia and other countries is key to formation of a Commonwealth unified economic area. The region includes eight out of the 12 CIS countries. Clearly, integration of Central Asian and Transcaucasian countries is a high priority in promoting effective economic cooperation in the Commonwealth as a whole. Meanwhile, successful economic relations are contingent on a sound investment policy. The relevance and topicality of the subject has to do with the complexity of problems brought about by the breakup of the Soviet Union. Rupture of economic, technological, infrastructural, commercial, social, and information links created an altogether different reality in the post-Soviet area. The Economic Council of CIS Member States arose from their understanding of the need to continue economic interaction in order to preserve, at the transitional stage, the economic and technical potential and the infrastructure of their respective countries. One key aspect of effective interaction between the CIS countries, crucial for overcoming the economic crisis and stabilizing and rebuilding the national economies, is development of interstate investment activity. The protracted investment crisis has become the main brake on development and restructuring of their economies. Investment activity in each of the Central Asian and Transcaucasian countries is ultimately predicated on the resources and behavior of domestic investors. At the same time, considering the annual need for foreign direct investment—which, according to expert estimates, is worth about $9 billion—it is extremely important to study and tap the experience of international cooperation. All attempts to resolve the deep systemic economic crisis through financial stabilization failed to produce successful results. Decline in production and investment activity was stopped at a critical point. 86 Investment support for pilot projects in the real sector of the economy could become a key line of new economic policy, leading to stabilization and revival of industry and agriculture. These problems are of a strategic character and are common to all countries in the region despite their specifics that always need to be reckoned with. 3.5. Investment Opportunities in Kazakhstan 3.5.1. Investment key: Comparative Study For understanding the economy and investment climate in Kazakhstan and comparison with Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Russia and Ukraina were taken follow parameters: unemployment rate, FDI net annual inflow, Growth in real GDP, Inflation rate, public revenue, currency, private savings, financial sector and indebtedness (ITIC). Exhibit 19. Investmrnt key Unemployme nt rate (%) FDI net annual inflow US$ millions Growth in real GDP (% change) Inflation rate CPI (Change end-year %), 1999 Public revenue Kazakhstan Russia 4.1 12.4 Ukraine 3.7 Uzbekistan 0.6 Azerbaijan 19.3 1,300 1,100 700 170 1,077 -2.5 -4.6 -1.7 2 10.1 1.9 84.5 20 40 -7.6 Low tax collection. The 1999 budget was passed by Parliament in April with tax code amendment s that are designed Poor tax collection especially after the peak of the financial crisis AugustSeptember of 1998. Expenditure cuts and budgetary reforms contributed to a sharp decline in the budget deficit in 1998. The stock of tax arrears has Relatively good tax collection owing to utilization of the banking system, e.g. deduction of taxes from accounts. Low tax collection. The state relies on large stateowned firms to contribute the bulk of its tax revenue, which narrows the 87 Currency primarily to meet these years' revenue requiremen ts. Full currency convertibili ty. In April 1999, the Kazakhstan Governmen t announced that the Tenge would be allowed to float "within rational expectation s" against the US$ risen to over 13 % of GDP by end 1998. Full currency convertibility . After the Russian financial crisis in 1998 the Rouble fell sharply against US$. Russia has officially assumed the obligations of Article VIII of IMF's Charter, which is the first step to full currency convertibility . However, due to the above financial crisis Russia had to introduce limitations on the list of cases when roubles can be converted into dollars Full currency convertibility . The Russian crisis placed pressure on the Ukrainian Hryvnia, which devalued by about 35% between August and early September 1998. This forced the introduction of a new trading band with the dollar, i.e. 2.5-3.5 UAH to the dollar. There are new restrictions on currency trading, aimed at minimizing future instability, e.g. exchange controls to help support the Hryvnia. The new Hryvnia/doll ar rate was exceeded in late 1998 and the 88 tax base Som imperfectly convertible . Convertible in principle for current account transaction s. Multiple exchange rates, i.e. official rate for central bank transaction s, commercial bank rate, unofficial market rate. Large "spread" between official and unofficial rates. Has officially assumed the obligations of Article VIII of the IMF Charter but range of controls on utilization of foreign currency. Currency not fully convertible. The impact of development s in Russia of autumn 1998 led to pressure on the exchange rate. Through intervention and a tightening of liquidity, the Azerbaijan National Bank succeeded in holding the exchange rate and restoring confidence; as a result of strong foreign currency inflows, the Manat has gradually appreciated. Foreign exchange reserves remain at four month of goods imports. Private savings In light of the devaluation of the tenge, depositors have been guaranteed US$ conversion at the old rate for maintainin g their tenge savings. Willingness to make savings in hard currency, primarily in US$. Lack of confidence in the national banking system. Transfer of savings into the state owned banks. There is no official information on how much Russian people keep in cash. Financial Sector The banking sector is highly concentrate d with about 6065% of all banking assets in the hands of four banks. A reform program is in place for the banking Crisis of the national banking system caused by actual default of Russia on the internal state securities market and significant debt of major Russian banks on hedging contracts Government has announced a new currency corridor of UAH 3.4-4.6 to the US$ The banking sector remains underdevelop ed. Lack of confidence towards the banking system. Depositors of the Savings Bank are covered by a formal deposit insurance scheme. However, there is no general deposit insurance on private savings Two-tier banking sector, which comprises 214 banks. All Ukrainian banks have been obliged to present their accounts according to International Auditing Standards. Loss-loan 89 To attract individual savings, no-name individual bank accounts were introduced in 1998. Majority of household deposits held at the stateowned Savings Bank. No official information on total private savings. Two-tier banking sector with 34 commercial banks. The state banks are undercapita lized and illequipped to satisfy legitimate enterprises funding requiremen The banking sector remains underdevelop ed and is dominated by four Sovietera state banks - these control around 6570% of the banking system's assets. Three of the four have serious sector. The ultimate target for all commercial banks is to achieve internation al standards in terms of capitalizati on, liquidity, asset quality, manageme nt standards, accounting practices and IT. The Kazakhstan stock exchange (KASE) was launched in September 1997. Turnover on the KASE almost doubled in 1998, however, the market remains highly illiquid with turnover reaching barely 2% of market capitalizati on. against rouble devaluation. The Central Bank of Russia (CBR) and special reconstructio n agency have prepared reconstructio n programs which prescribe financial assistance for certain banks and bankruptcy for the others. CBR takes measures to introduce strict control in the Russian banking system, for example, CBR increased mandatory reserves. As for the securities market, after the crisis it was nearly frozen but at the end of 1998 it started to show signs of stability. Trade provisioning has been introduced and a deposit insurance law enacted. By late 1998, an estimated 30-35% of loans were nonperforming. Ukraine has four stock exchanges. The largest and most significant is Kyiv (95% of all trading). Kyiv is the fifth largest emerging equity market in Eastern Europe and the CIS. 90 ts. Foreign banks present, but stateowned National Bank of Uzbekistan dominates. Range of services provided to clients is limited. However, inter-bank settlement system is well developed. Internation al Auditing Standards in force for audits carried out by all Uzbek banks. Financial markets are in the early stages of developme nt. The stock exchange (created in 1995), set new listing requiremen ts in 1998. asset and liquidity problems. Restructuring programs for the four state banks are designed to prevent any further banking crises from emerging. The private banking sector consists of over 70 commercial banks. Lending risks remain high. Azrbaijan has no official stock market although the government is now addressing the need for ist future development. In December 1998 a securities commission was established. Further progress in strengthening the regulatory framework for the issuance, registration volume is approximatel y US$100200m a month. Indebtedness Kazakhstan 's total external debt was estimated at the end of 1998 at US$7.543b n, having increased over the year by 26.7%. The country faces the prospect of a rise in debt, owning to its widening external borrowing requiremen ts. Kazakhstan 's foreign and local currency issuer credit ratings were downgrade d to B+ in September 1998. Moody's rating is B1 while Thompson' External debt amounts to more than USD 130bn. Internal debt of the federal government amounted to more than RUR 400bn and after 17 August 1998 was restructured. There exist significant mutual debts of the enterprises. Not infrequently mutual liabilities are covered by barter and offset against mutual indebtedness. Credit rating of Russia is B3 according to Moody's and SD (selective default) according to Standard & Poor's. Negotiations are continuing Indebtedness in Ukraine is increasing, with public debt totaling US$14.9bn in October 1998. Foreign debt totaled US$11.5bn at end 1998, of which US$2.4bn was to international financial organizations . During 1998, the debt grew by around US$2bn. Moody's foreign currency rating is B3; Thompson's is B-. 91 The stock of external debt stood at US$2.8bn at the end of 1998, representin g 20% of GDP. Uzbekistan' s ability to run up external imbalances is limited by the fact that it has not received support from the IMF since December 1996. Uzbekistan has no credit rating but the Governmen t is holding discussions with Standard & Poor. It is expecting a rating of BB-. A large proportion and trading of corporate securities is planned under the IMF program in 1999. External debt amounts to more than $704 million. The stock of debt is projected to peak in 1999 (17% of GDP) and decline thereafter. In 1997, an agreement was reached with Russia to cancel all mutual outstanding debt obligation, and a loan from the EU was fully repaid in September 1997. Azerbaijan's external public debt consists mainly of concessional long-term debt and derives largely from bilateral and multilateral lenders. Thompson s is B with IMF. of sovereign debt is guaranteed. Financial BankWatch gives a B rating for foreign currency. No other ratings are available. There are about 1400 Joint Ventures in Kazakhstan founded by partners from 61 countries. There are after-effects from the Russian crisis, as trade with Russia accounts for 30% of Kazakhstan exports. The tenge devaluation in 2000 has made Kazakh exports competitive "vis-a-vis" other countries in the region, but due to restructuring, the economy is forecast to contract slightly in 2006. However, the Kazakh government was swift to respond with fiscal tightening and an acceleration of privatization. 3.5.2. Investment Activities in Kazakhstan Investment activities in Kazakhstan are aimed at revival of the process of reproduction at the expense of both foreign and domestic sources of funding. The State works towards all possible attraction of foreign capital, towards creating an entire set of favorable factors. President Nursultan Nazarbayev of Kazakhstan firmly adheres to this policy particularly emphasizing that "our cardinal objective is to present Kazakhstan in the eyes of the world community as a fairly attractive object of investments in major industries". Many representatives of foreign companies and firms, certain businessmen express their appreciation of the investment climate in Kazakhstan. Apart from rich natural resources, agrarian and industrial potential, competent personnel and a relatively qualified and cheap manpower, beneficial geopolitical location, they particularly make notice of stable political situation, stable inter-ethnic relations. On announcing attraction of foreign capital as its topmost strategic priority Kazakhstan consistently implements all requisite moves which would lead to creating a civilized legislative basis for integration into world economy and transition to an open economy. 92 There has been passed Laws "On foreign investments", "On state support sustained in favor of direct investments". On top of these, President Nursultan Nazarbayev of Kazakhstan issued Decrees "On approving the list of priority economic sectors of the Republic of Kazakhstan meant for attraction of direct foreign investments" and "On approving the Regulation on the system of benefits and preferences and on the procedure of granting thereof when concluding contracts with investors". In 1997 the package of legal standard acts of the Republic on legal regulation of investment relation on both national and international levels was supplemented with Laws of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On state support in favor of direct investments", "On securities market", "On registering transactions with securities". Besides there has been concluded quite a number of interstate agreements on enhancing and reciprocal protection of investments. On the whole, at the moment more than 20 legislative and standard legal acts govern the procedure of attraction and protection of foreign capital. According to the above, foreign investments in Kazakhstan can be made practically in any facility and variety of activities in all authorized organizational-and-legal forms - up to creating foreign firms (i.e. those completely owned by foreign investors), branches and representations thereof or joint ventures with partial ownership of respective property. Foreign investors are guaranteed - within their own discretion - use of revenues received from their activities for reinvestment in the Republic, for purchasing goods and such other purposes. Taking into account sheer expediency of attracting large-scale investment resources in the economy of the country, rational and effective use thereof, by virtue (of the Presidential Decree there has been set up a single specially authorized body - State Committee of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Investments. Certain activities are underway in the Republic to advertise attraction of direct investments into priority sectors of the economy. Within the framework of the official visit of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan to the United States of America at the Washington University Gallodet there was conducted a conference "Trade and investment opportunities in Kazakhstan and its geo-strategic significance" with the participation of major American and transnational companies. 93 The recently adopted legislative acts and a number of organizational measures are sure to enhance the influx of foreign investments in Kazakhstan economy. Today nearly 40 countries invest their assets in Kazakhstan economy. Worth notice is, though, that today the State tends to favor attraction of direct investments. Escalation in investment activities promotes ever rising growth of economy. Rise in the combined amount of investments in the fixed capital of Kazakhstan economy has been gained at the expense of investments in oil and gas industries with the latter's share within the general scope of investments amounts to 43%, housing construction - 12%, ferrous and non- ferrous metallurgy - 8% and transport - 7%. In terms of attraction of direct foreign investments, international fiscal agencies qualified Kazakhstan as one of the leading countries among other transition economies of Eastern Europe. Basic guidelines of national social and economic policy to be pursued in 1998 provide for ever further implementation of the investment policy based on the following principles: • national (state) support granted to enterprises at the expense of centralized investments when transferring center of gravity from non-payable funding to crediting on a retrievable, paid basis. Non-repayable budget financing would be preserved mostly for socially significant objects of non-commercial, unprofitable nature which cannot afford funding sources of their own; • substantial expansion of practices of joint (share-wise) state-and-commercial funding of investment facilities (projects) including those which imply attraction of foreign capital. Such practices add to meeting the lack of centralized assets meant for implementation of state programs of capital construction; • use of a part of centralized (credit) investment assets for implementing particularly effective and quick-recoupable investment projects and small-business facilities irrespective of their branch affiliation property form to accelerate structural transformation of industries; • improving standard basis aimed at boosting the influx of domestic and foreign capital in the sphere of investments; 94 • toughening of state-exercised control over the purposeful spending of the Republican budget assets allocated in investments in the form of non-repayable funding and crediting. There are no limits to amounts of foreign commercial credits independently (i.e. without being granted government guarantees) attracted by banks and other business entities of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Assets of the Republican budget are meant primarily for construction and reconstruction of group water pipelines and custom check-points, implementation of housing construction programs in certain regions, construction of particular facilities of medicare, education, transport and communications, power supply, machine-building and the like. Particular emphasis would be given to the development to the leasing business as one of the most promising guidelines in stepping up investment processes and an effective motive force in technical re-equipment of industries. It is in this context that they contemplate adopting Laws "On introducing alterations and amendments to the Laws of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On foreign investments" and "On financial leasing", and "On introducing alterations and amendments to the law-effective Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Licensing". 3.5.3 Attractiveness for foreign investors Kazakhstan merits serious consideration as a location for foreign investment. After consideration of motives' list shown above, the reasons that can be called as positive factors for investment into Economy of Kazakhstan for foreign Investors today are: • A foreign policy designed to keep effective relationships with its neighbors and with the leading world economies; • An internationally-orientated economy with under-exploited energy and mineral resources; • An economy, which has come through the most painful period of transition, and now has the prospect of steady growth; 95 • An early opportunity to establish market share in a market of sixteen million people, which hitherto has not attracted much attention from foreign companies outside the energy sector. • An effective central bank which has demonstrated its ability to pursue independent policies to get inflation under control; • A stable political environment Of course, all of the positive factors for foreign investors in Kazakhstan can not be considered without definition the risks factors, which will be discussed in the next section of the paper. 3.5.4. Risk for Investors Investing in emerging markets is not necessarily a hugely risky task, as not investing may be even more risky for the company if the market develops as forecast and most competitors take advantage of investment opportunities. Focusing on the alleged high risks involved in investing in an emerging market like Kazakhstan, as done, for example by Fowler may therefore blur the analysis rather than enrich it. There are follow risks for foreign investors in Kazakhstan at the moment: • underdeveloped infrastructure; • national economy susceptible for raw material price fluctuations; • political pressure on investors increases; • corruption widespread; • relatively small domestic market and low purchasing power. 3.5.5. Foreign investment law The foreign investment law defines the fundamental legal and economic principles upon which foreign investments should be drawn in the economy of Kazakhstan. It also 96 establishes guarantees of the protection of foreign investments, and defines the legal forms of foreign investments. Under the foreign investment law, a foreign capital investor can be a legal foreign personality, a foreign citizen, a citizen of Kazakhstan who is permanently a local resident outwards of Kazakhstan, a foreign government or an international organization. Investments can flow in in movable and immovable property, shares, bonds, mental property and by government granted licenses. (F.A.Z. institute in 2005) 3.6. Foreign experience of engaging and the use of international capital and investments As against countries CIS, less developed countries of far abroad have accumulated much more experience in engaging and use the of international credit and enterprise capital and investments. And, alongside with widely known experience of countries of Latin America and countries of Southeast Asia, interest is represented with practice of other countries which were not achieving so impressing results in economic development, but, at the same time which experience is rather cognitive and interesting to countries CIS. Any privileges and endorsements are not capable to compensate these factors (Ospanov, 2004). The investment climate in Egypt is characterized by follow positive moments. 1. A transparency of country for international investments. The government of Egypt has as a whole opened the way for direct foreign investments also encourages the actions activity of private sectors in the majority of the sectors of the economy. As a part of the obligations under the agreement on the World Bank loan, the Egyptian government has started in 1991 the program on expansion of a role of a private sector in a national economy basically through realization of investment plans. To the middle of 1991 the government has substituted a permit system under investments with a system of selection in which investments are approved automatically if the sector of the economy is not introduced in a so-called "negative list" of projects. The "Negative" list includes (Ospanov, 2004): 97 • Military production and branches connected to their manufacture; • Tobacco and tobacco production; • Investments on Sinai (except for an oil, gas and mineral raw material). 2. Laws and the norms regulating foreign investments. The law on foreign investments is passed in 1998 and is the basic legal document allowing foreigners to have 100 % of the property of the founded companies. The law guarantees the right to operate in Egypt and to transfer abroad profit and a fixed capital. The companies established on the basis of the given law, are subject to regulation on the part of General Authority for Investment and Free Zones (GAIFZ). The law limits investments in some regins of country. Investments can be realized in relation to tourism, housing construction, development of various forms of real estate, service of a petroleum industry, medical services, repair of motor vehicles, construction of pumping stations, services in the field of transport and advisory services in various branches of the economy and business. GAIFZ has offered on consideration of government conditions to the law on the market of capitals where it is offered to grant the sanction to investments for securities administration. The law on investments defines discrepancy between internal investments and investments in a free zone. Activity of free zones is adjusted by the law on investments. They are open for any kinds of branch investments. The companies are released of taxes and any taxes, annually 1 % from cost of the goods imported and exported from a free zone, or from the gross profit received as a result of accomplishment of projects, not claiming importation or removal of the goods however pay (Ospanov, 2004). Agreements on concessions, in particular in the field of petroleum, a natural gas, also are considered as areas of a free zone. Each agreement on concessions strikes root separately and qualifies as obligatory approval of the bodies of legislation of country. Under other major law of Egypt - the companies’ act, foreign incorporated companies can have foreign, the property in the size up to 51 % from a total cost. Provided that at least 49 % of shares should be offered to Egyptians, under the law 159, in the end the company can have 100 % of the shares belonging to foreigners. 98 Foreign direct investments in Islamic republic Iran are permitted only by means of participation foreign persons in the share capital of the existing and new Iranian companies. The maximum share of foreign participation in the joint companies constitutes 49 %, however this share will be defined depending on character of investment object. The law on engaging and protection of the foreign investments provides legal frameworks for approval of all foreign investments in Iran. The procedure of approval of foreign investments will consist of several stages (Ospanov, 2004): 1. A choice of the suitable Iranian partner. 2. Receiving of “the basic consent”. 3. The circulation concerning realization of investment object. 4. Consideration of the application “the Supervisory council on engaging and protection of foreign investments ". 5. The decree of Council of Ministers of Iran. The decree is the official sanction to the foreign investor to start to take of a measure on importation of the capital to Iran. After official registration the capital of the foreign investor is protected by the Iranian Law. 6. Creation of the joint company. After the announcement the Supervisory council of the positive decision or after acceptance of the decree of Council of Ministers of Iran, local or foreign investors of the capital can create the joint companies for the beginning the investment activity. As we can see, a procedure of the sanction and the admission of the foreign investor on territory of Iran is very difficult. Especial interest represents experience of the developed countries on creation of special investment structures. Consider one of such structures - the German financial - consulting structure DEG encouraging private business in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and also in countries Central and the East Europe (Ospanov, 2004). • DEG finances risk assets in these regions. • DEG renders consulting services to the businessmen realizing foreign investments. 99 • To partners DEG refer prosperous national and the foreign firms interested in long-term cooperation or already participating in business life of indicated regions. • Work of DEG is based on principles of private business. DEG participates in all kinds of activity of a private sector. Realized DEG financial investments are profitable, they will be agreed accepted norms on preservation of the environment and promote economic development of corresponding countries. The form and volume of financing, as a rule, are specially selected so that to satisfy with requirement of the enterprise for country of investment. DEG finances both starting, and the developing enterprises, and also investment in perfecting and modernization of manufacture realizes. Commitments of finance usually constitute from 5 million up to 20 million DM on the project. DEG grants loans for market conditions. As a security for the loan the property of the enterprise included in the project in country of investment usually serves. Thus financial contribution DEG is, as a rule, in a reasonable ratio with volume of planned investments: • For the starting enterprises usually - up to 35 %; • For the developing enterprises - up to 100 %. Other financial services can be if necessary organized at the expense of national and international business banks and development banks DEG (Ospanov, 2004). Experience of countries of Latin America represents for us interest from the point of view of that engaging and use of the foreign capital and investments has received ambiguous estimations, has yielded in them various results and passed in conditions, as a rule, an economic crisis. All this gives to experience of these countries, from the point of view of analogousness to domestic conditions and problems, the big value and interest. After the first wave of investments in these countries in 60-70 years and after long calm, interest of investors to the given market has again increased. Cumulative foreign 100 investments for the last 5 years in these countries are evaluated by the sum from above 100 billion dollars. Primary factor of inflow of the foreign capital and investments in economy of Argentina were its successes in financial stabilization. What underlies the Latin American phenomenon of engaging of investments? 1. These are global tendencies in the region, connected with common liberalization of a financial field, minimization of interference of the state in pricing, interest rates. Today the states of Latin America are more and more integrated and unified on conducted economic policy, in countries there were advanced market financial technologies and tools. 2. Creation of an effective state policy of engaging of the foreign capital. Such policy has been based on the following preconditions: • Essential reduction of budget deficit in all countries at the expense of changes in the taxation, pricing and current account policy; • Improvement of internal structure of the prices; • Structural reorganization with the purpose of stimulation of the offer and liberalization financial market. As a result of reforms, for example, in Argentina budget deficit was essentially reduced, the labor efficiency has sharply grown, inflation has decreased. The important step for engaging foreign investments and the capital was removal of limitations on export of the profit. It stimulated increase in manufacture and the profit. 3. Creation of legal base for engaging the foreign capital and investments. In countries of Latin America to the given factor attaches special significance. Today there are no limitations on investment activity, encumbrances for removal of dividends and the profit are removed, and procedures of registration of investors are simplified. 4. Stabilization of investment process. Each of the Latin American countries faced to the same dilemma which faces to countries CIS. On the one hand, engaging of foreign investments was necessary for stimulation of an aggregate demand. However, thus it was 101 necessary to avoid such collateral destabilizing effects, as complication of realization of monetary policy and revaluation of monetary unit. As the basic protective measure against differences in volume of foreign investments their "sterilization" realized in the form of loans of the Central bank at business banks, transfer of government deposits from business banks to Central Bank, increase of the interest rate under assets and liabilities of the Central bank was applied. The sterilizing effect also was achieved by sale of governmental liabilities. As investments were stabilized, governments of the majority of countries weakened a degree of sterilization. The majority of countries attempts to adjust undertook inflow of investments with the help of the taxation, toughening of reserve requests to bank deposits, credits from abroad, and changes of commissions at external economic operations. For example, the Central bank of Chile in 1991г. has entered new reserve requests - 20 % for all new credits from abroad except for trade. Then these requests were distributed to all other external credits, and in 1993 reserve requests have been increased up to 30 %. The Mexican government has established the new order limiting a share of currency liabilities of the majority of banks up to 10 % of their general extra portfolio, thus of 15 % of this sum should be placed in высоколиквидных valuable papers (Ospanov, 2004). The program of liberalization of foreign investments is the constituent of wider policy on stimulation of the private initiative and, first of all, national businessmen. The given aspect is important in the sense that as shows experience of countries CIS, and Kazakhstan in particular, engaging industrial and the banking capital is considered frequently as a separate problem. It results to that foreign investors as a result of tax, investment privileges appear in more favorable provision, that at this positive effect gives rather strong negative effect from decrease of investment activity of national investors. The purpose of the program of liberalization of foreign investment is general state reorientation on replacement of bank international crediting by engaging of direct industrial investments. 102 From the point of view of world experience it would be interesting to analyze experience of less developed countries in questions of participation of the foreign capital in privatization. Such analysis results in the following breeding (Ospanov, 2004): 1. Wide sharing the foreign capital in privatization is supervised only in countries especially undeveloped, not having neither economic, nor resource potential. To such countries it is possible to relate Ecuador, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Maldives, etc.; 2. Countries with the certain economic potential conducted mass privatization in usual sectors of economy and rather selective - in the branches having strategic significance. So, for example, such countries as Argentina, Mexico, Brazil, India, etc. have chosen as priority those or other branches and these branches became branches with strict state control. In some countries in view of absence of natural stocks or advanced Industry (at availability even natural resources) as priority could choose, for example, biotechnology, fibred-optical technique, etc. spheres of economy. This experience, unfortunately, is not taken into account at realization of privatization ("transfers to management") in some countries CIS. Thus, experience of countries of far abroad is rather diverse both under the content, and by the received results. Countries CIS in this plan should take those methods which have appeared the most effective on arms and have brought appreciable results in short time. 4 CASE STUDIES 4.1 Chevron in Kazakhstan In Kazakhstan, fewer than 17 million people populate an arid swath of Central Asia four times the size of Texas and larger than Great Britain, France, Germany, Spain, Austria, Holland, and Denmark combined. It's a land of harsh winters and parched summers, expansive deserts and remote mountains. It's also a land rich with natural resources: prior to gaining independence in 1991, Kazakhstan produced seventy percent of the Soviet Union's lead, zinc, magnesium, tin, and titanium; sixty percent of its silver and molybdenum; thirty- 103 five percent of its copper; and considerable amounts of its gold, uranium, and coal (Dosmukhamedov, 1993). Today, Kazakhstan's most precious asset is its oil. Though it developed petroleum resources throughout the Soviet era, Kazakhstan retains a significant quantity of both proven and potential reserves. It produces more oil - over half a million barrels per day -than any other former Soviet republic except Russia. Nearly half comes from three major onshore fields: Tengiz, Uzen, and Karachaganak. Potential offshore reserves in the Caspian Sea are much larger, estimated at upward to 30 billion barrels, with proven reserves of over 15 billon barrels. Though many uncertainties remain, oil development is certain to generate substantial wealth for Kazakhstan. Nurlan Balgimbayev, the former Prime Minister and current chief of Kazakhoil, has estimated that offshore oil and gas revenues alone could total $700 billion over the next 40 years. Kazakhstan has much in common with Azerbaijan. It too is in the midst of an oil boom and looks to multinational oil companies to participate in developing its resources. Yet like Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan has only partially established representative government, respect for human rights, and the rule of law. President Nazarbayev largely controls the judicial and legislative branches, ruling at times by decree. His term in office was extended in January of 1999 by an election that fell short of international standards. The government harasses and monitors citizens through Committee for National Security (the successor to the KGB, which reports directly to the President) and the Interior Ministry Police; both organizations have arbitrarily detained, tortured and killed citizens. The government resists and hampers outside monitoring of human rights, while the courts have prevented the public from observing trials of government officials. (U.S. Department of State, 2000) The economic situation in Kazakhstan is somewhat brighter than in Azerbaijan. Oil production has already generated substantial revenue; Kazakhstan led the former Soviet Bloc in foreign investment for much of the 1990s, accounting in 1996 for approximately fourteen percent of all foreign investment in the former Soviet Union. The official GDP per capita, adjusted for purchasing power parity, is approximately $3,200 (WFB, 2000). While Kazakhstan was hurt by the Asian financial crisis and Russia's economic woes, it has recently devalued its currency and benefited from recent rises in oil prices. As in Azerbaijan, however, corruption flourishes while socioeconomic inequality increases. Likewise, Kazakhstan's Soviet legacy of environmental pollution - much of it related to oil production 104 - is dismal. Polluted groundwater, open pools of oil scum burning out of control, and rusting equipment left abandoned are common in Kazakhstan's western oil fields. Foreign oil companies at work in Kazakhstan thus face many of the same situations, dealing with a government that does not fully serve the interests of the people or maintain the institutions of a democracy. The principal difference between Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan is that in Kazakhstan, large-scale oil production is already underway. Chevron has been a leader in this effort, beginning with its historic $20 billion agreement with the Kazakh government in April of 1993 to redevelop the Tengiz oil field. The agreement established a joint venture, called Tengizchevroil, owned in equal portions by Chevron and the Kazakh government. With production set to reach 340,000 barrels per day by 2002 (ultimately peaking at 750,000 barrels per day by 2010), Tengizchevroil is by far the biggest oil producer in Kazakhstan. Tengizchevroil represented the first major step in a development process that currently involves nearly every major multinational oil company in one or more of over fifty joint ventures and/or exploration agreements. These range from minor natural gas projects to the Offshore Kazakhstan International Operating Company's (OKIOC) exploration of the Kashagan block of the Kazakhstan's Caspian holdings, which are estimated to contain structures with up to 40 billion recoverable barrels of oil. OKIOC, which was created with the Kazakh government in 1997 and began drilling test wells in 1999, has caught the attention the entire industry: results of its tests promise to offer an indicator of the Caspian's total reserves. As the first and most active foreign oil company in the country, Chevron plays an important role in determining the shape of future foreign oil development in the country. The following sections assess its performance in environmental and social aspects of oil development 4.1.1 Environmental Issues Tengizchevroil operates in Kazakhstan under terms spelled out in its Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) with the Kazakh government. According to Tengizchevroil's Manager of Government Relations, the consortium operates under a Code of Conduct that is "basically 105 the same as it is everywhere - protecting people and the environment." Environmental standards are included in the consortium's PSA. While Tengizchevroil will not disclose the contents of the agreement, it claims the environmental standards follow the standards set forth in Kazakhstan's environmental legislation. Kazakh environmental law relevant to oil production is found in three main sources: the Law on Environmental Impact Assessment, the Law on Specially Protected Natural Territories, and the Law on Environmental Protection. The "central executive organ for state control of the environment and natural resource use" is the Ministry of the Environment and Bioresources (MEB). Environmentalists note that while MEB is allowed broad jurisdiction in environmental inspection, it has the exact same status as other ministries in the Republic; the MEB can inspect, but not enforce. The current status significantly reduces the effectiveness of the MEB's activities and permits influential ministries, departments, local authorities and private businessmen to ignore its decisions and requirements to a significant degree. The principal legislation guiding oil development is the 1992 Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Subsoil Resources and Processing of Minerals (hereafter "Subsoil Law"), as amended in 1999, and the amended Edict of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan Concerning Petroleum (hereafter "Petroleum Law"). The Subsoil Law "shows signs of having been drafted from an economic perspective," especially in defining subsoil as "a part of the natural environment which can be used for satisfying economic and other needs through the separation of its components or for the location of underground installations, confinement of toxic substances and wastes of industry, and the discharge of sewer waters." Recent amendments to the Petroleum Law place most oversight of foreign oil companies directly in the hands of Kazakhoil, the state oil company formed in 1997. Specifically, Kazakhoil has the right to: • participate in the development of a strategy for increasing petroleum production; • represent the State in petroleum operations by means of mandatory share participation in PSA's; • participate in organizing tenders for petroleum operations in Kazakhstan, including sectors of the Caspian and Aral Seas; and • prepare and implement new projects related to petroleum operations. 106 The amendments eliminate license requirements in favor of contract provisions that state agreed-upon terms. Foreign oil companies therefore no longer have to separately negotiate both a license and a contract. The introduction of new procedures regulating commercial discoveries, compensation for exploration costs, requirement for work programs, and contractor claim resolutions place Kazakhoil at the center of oil operation management in Kazakhstan. Regarding environmental protection, the amendments state that contractors must receive written permission of the "State Body" to conduct petroleum operations at sea. (While the amendments are unclear regarding who the "State Body" is, it appears to be under the authority of Kazakhoil.) Contractors operating at sea must are obliged to use the best available methods to protect the marine environment. Such contractors are strictly liable for harm to individuals or to legal entities resulting from the pollution of the sea as a result of oil operations. The amended law also limits the types of provisions that can be in oil contracts, stipulating that the law of the Republic of Kazakhstan is the exclusive law applicable to any oil operation in its territory as well as to any offshore oil operations. Specifically, oil contracts cannot stipulate application of foreign law, with the exception of offshore oil operations conducted on bordering deposits where the law of an adjacent state can be applied if expressly stated by an international agreement with Kazakhstan. Tengizchevroil, according to it representative, has no difficulty complying with this regulatory framework. It views the evolution of Kazakh environmental law favorably, calling the new set of environmental laws "more realistic" than what came before. It will not disclose specific standards, but affirms that "daily monitoring ensures compliance with environmental regulations" and takes pride in its environmental record. The consortium "hasn't really had a big problem with fines or inspectors" and considers the state monitors "well-trained and well-equipped." Though positive in its assessment of its compliance, Tengizchevroil pays a substantial amount in fines for violations. The number and size of fines have steadily increased; in 1998 they amounted to more than 238 million tenge (US$2.7 million). Emissions, especially from gas flaring, are a particular point of concern. Tengiz oil contains up to 25% broad fraction 107 high-sulfur liquefied petroleum gas, methane and hydrogen sulfide that are separated in processing trains. The petroleum gas, with a much higher sulfur content than is allowed by U.S. and U.K. regulations, only meets so-called "CIS specifications." According to Tengizchevroil, this is because many of the hydrocarbon products produced at Tengiz are intended for local, rather than European markets - hence the lower standard. The consortium admits that it has had difficulties handling the emissions and states that sometime within next two to three years it will install LPG equipment and other facilities to curb flaring. Kazakh authorities are also concerned about what Tengizchevroil will do with the over 2.3 million tons of hydrogen sulfide it currently stores in six pyramids. This amount will increase if Tengizchevroil installs a processing train to remove hydrogen sulfide sometime in the spring of 2000 as it plans to do. Regional authorities have pressed the consortium to invest in sulfur granulation equipment, with little success. Some environmental groups and local authorities suspect the consortium is reluctant to invest in additional equipment because it is cheaper simply to pay environmental fines. Tengizchevroil's representative states that the consortium and the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources "agree on a yearly basis the level of emissions that we will pay for" and have negotiated agreements for emissions monitoring Unfortunately, environmental groups are excluded from the agreements and neither the government nor the oil companies will provide them with copies of the agreements Tengizchevroil's spokesperson and Kazakh government officials state they cannot release these agreements, even though they are public laws. While local authorities have pressured Tengizchevroil to reduce emissions, environmental groups retain the impression that "large issues are decided by the central government, and they chose oil money over environmental concerns." Though central government officials dispute this characterization, oil companies and environmental group s agree that monitoring and regulatory practices in Kazakhstan are flawed - and that everyone, especially Chevron, would benefit from independent, third party monitoring. Effective third party monitoring does not exist. According to Imangali Tasmagambetov, governor of the Atyrau region, Tengizchevroil and the regional government contribute to a Regional Ecological Fund, which conducts what he describes as "independent environmental audits" around Tengiz However, Tengizchevroil has taken issue with some of 108 the monitoring methods after a dispute with regulators and now appears to support the establishment of an independent monitoring system. According to its spokesperson, the consortium "sometimes" supports the idea, believing it would benefit the consortium by increasing local confidence in its environmental performance. There is presently no legal mechanism by which the consortium can request a third-party assessment. Environmental and community groups believe the Kazakh government and foreign oil companies should demonstrate their willingness to protect citizens and the environment by publicizing and improving regulatory practices. International petroleum advisors agree, noting a widespread desire among foreign oil companies to see Kazakhstan modernize its regulatory system and re-train many of the health, safety, and environmental inspectors. According to one petroleum analyst, Kazakh regulatory agencies need to refashion their concept of regulation to "recognize the difference between performance-based regulations and regulations for regulations' sake, and train their inspectors to make more informed, comprehensive assessments of health, safety, and environmental factors, rather than "simply checking regulatory boxes without regard for the overall operations." Additionally, some Kazakh community groups are concerned that Kazakhstan's Tengiz venture with Chevron has set unfortunate precedents for future development. They believe that since the Tengiz deal, government officials have rapidly pursued similar deals at the expense of the environment. In particular, environmental and community groups see the massive signing bonuses typically offered by foreign companies as inimical to careful consideration of potential environmental impacts. Environmental groups point out that shortly after the government negotiated the Tengiz deal with Chevron, it decided to essentially withdraw the protected status of the northern Caspian to allow exploration by OKIOC, which has established a joint venture involving tens of millions of dollars in signing bonuses. In August of 1999 OKIOC drilled its first well in the Kazakh sector of the Caspian Sea, described as possibly one of the "largest undeveloped oilfields in the world." While the Kazakh government sold its stake in OKIOC in 1998 to help reduce budget deficits, still stands to reap 80 percent of the profits under the terms of its PSA with OKIOC. Kazakh environmental groups, citizens in the region, and scientists have grave concerns about how this drilling and potentially enormous amount of extracted oil will affect the 109 area's delicate ecosystem. The northern part of the Caspian is extremely shallow, with depths of only two to nine meters. Among its abundant wildlife are three-quarters of the world's sturgeon, which produce caviar, another expensive commodity. Environmental scientists fear that even a small accident could ruin the delicate balance of this shallow part of the Caspian. The Caspian Nature Group, a regional NGO, recently demanded (unsuccessfully) that the Kazakh government ban marine drilling to protected valuable marine and bird habitat on the shallow sea shelf. Realizing it could not convince the government or oil companies to preserve the protected status of the northern Caspian, the group pressured oil companies to purchase additional insurance to compensate for any negative environmental impacts. As a result of this campaigning, OKIOC has taken out a $1 billion ecological insurance policy to cover drilling of the first exploration wells. It has also spent more than US$100 million to adapt its drilling barge, and flown a group of Kazakh journalists to Louisiana to show them how oil is produced in shallow waters of the Gulf of Mexico. The consortium maintains that it will apply collection technology and environmental research performed in the gulf to its operation in the northern Caspian. Environmental groups and local residents remain skeptical, however, arguing that the consequences of an accident in the shallow, enclosed Northern Caspian would be far worse than in the deeper Gulf of Mexico, where currents are better able to flush out and disperse pollutants. Despite pressure from environmental groups, OKIOC drilling began before the Kazakh government had developed a National Oil Spill Response Plan. This contradicted earlier promises made by the government and its western advisers that such a plan would be in place before drilling began. OKIOC s claim that it has developed its own spill response plan has not appeased everyone - the Minister of Natural Resources also sought (unsuccessfully) to postpone drilling until after a national plan was adopted. According to one of the government's petroleum advisors, OKIOC simply didn't want to wait. Taken together, these areas of concern suggest that Tengizchevroil and other foreign ventures are operating in a situation where standards are murky, regulation is limited and/or inadequate, and where the potential for government revenue threatens environmental protection. The presence of foreign companies such as Chevron may ultimately help to create a more effective and accountable framework for environmental stewardship, but this has not yet happened. 110 4.1.2 Social Issues Many of the individuals interviewed for this report express concern regarding Tengizchevroil' s performance on social issues, particular labor relations, human rights, and community development. Regarding labor issues, observers generally agree that Tengizchevroil standards are significantly higher than those which prevailed under the Soviets. The consortium will not disclose specific standards and/or Codes of Conduct, but claims its policy is guided by a number of goals, which include: • increasing the amount of employee training and educational assistance programs; • assigning more overseas assignments to local workers; • increasing employee compensation; • offering housing loans to employees; and • increasing the percentage of Kazakh citizens working at the consortium. The consortium has maintained high health, safety, and labor standards. In 1998, Tengizchevroil achieved 5 million consecutive man-hours without a lost time incident. As of September 1999, the consortium had reached 3 million man-hours for 1999, while their contractors had reached 5 million.96 Kazakh citizens now hold 71% of Tengizchevoil' s staff positions, compared with 55% in 1993. Investment in employee training has risen from approximately $1.8 million in 1994 to approximately $6.2 million in 1998, as has the investment in educational assistance programs (approximately $320 million in 1998, compared to $25 million in 1994). The consortium has sent over 130 local employees on overseas training assignments in the United States and the United Kingdom, tripled average employee compensation over the last 4 years, and awarded more than 1,000 employees housing loans in the same time period. The consortium's relationship to unions is reportedly more ambivalent. Tengizchevroil claims not to disfavor union membership; there is an independent labor union at the consortium, of which approximately 500 of the 3,200 employees are members. According to the consortium's spokesperson, it has never struck or threatened to strike. Conflicts that have arisen have been ostensibly been due to "different perceptions of business practices." The 111 consortium holds town hall meetings once per month in order to maintain a dialogue with the union members and avoid disputes over these "differences in perception." Union observers agree that Tengizchevroil treats its workers very well, providing them with better pay and better health, safety, and labor conditions than workers at local oil companies enjoy. However, some observers dispute Tengizchevroil's claim not to disfavor union membership, particularly membership in national trade unions. They claim the foreign companies don't want trade unions and would rather not employ trade union members; faced with the existence of separate oil unions, the companies now encourage them because they are easier to control than the larger, stronger, national unions. A Kazakh union leader further alleges that foreign companies don't always abide by Kazakh law, especially in disregarding requirements for advance notices of dismissal and the use of short-term contracts that are illegal because they provide no provisions for future opportunities. In addition to violating labor laws, the same union leader claims, foreign companies have been a driving force behind the weakened social and economic protections afforded by the new Labor Law, which does not require companies to pay over-time or to notify unions of increased work hours or reductions in compensation. Labor law has changed significantly in recent years. In September of 1999, the Kazakh parliament replaced the old labor code with the new Labor Law, which, according to a lawyer who was a member of the working group, contains provisions that affect trade unions and the right to strike. The new law makes it clear that unions may choose to be independent (local) or centralized. At present, there are two major trade unions in Kazakhstan: the Federation of Trade Unions, and the Confederation of Free Trade Unions of Kazakhstan. Smaller trade unions exist at individual companies such as Tengizchevroil. Tengizchevroil disputes the claim that it skirts labor laws. It claims to have been vindicated by the courts, citing a recent case in which it decided to outsource some of its service business to newly created companies and offered jobs at these new companies to drivers who had previously been employed by the consortium. When the drivers refused the positions, the consortium dismissed them; the drivers sued in local court and won an order for reinstatement. However, Tengizchevroil appealed the case all the way to the highest court in Kazakhstan, which ruled in the consortium's favor. 112 The extent of corporate compliance with labor laws is difficult to measure, but it seems to be generally good. More vexing for labor leaders is the consortium's seeming unwillingness to communicate directly with unions. This lack of communication is illustrated by the fact that the trade unions are not privy to the companies' Code of Conduct or any other statements defining business practices. Union representatives thus cannot evaluate whether Chevron or Tengizchevroil' s practices accord with such statements or codes. Tengizchevroil's hands-off approach to unions is mirrored by a seeming disengagement from the political situation of the country. As a newly independent nation undergoing painful transition, Kazakhstan struggles with only weakly established democratic institutions, a poor human rights record, widespread and rising poverty, and endemic government corruption. Since 1991, Kazakhstan has been a democracy, with elected legislative and executive branches and an appointed judiciary. However, power is heavily concentrated in the person of the president, Nursultan Nazarbayev, who can legislate by decree and largely control the judiciary. Presidential and parliamentary elections, as well as the 1995 referendum leading to the adoption of the constitution, were all marred by irregularities and fell short of international standards. The 1995 constitution establishes and guarantees basic human rights such freedom of speech, religion, and association. By just about any standards, however, Kazakhstan's human rights record is poor. According to Kazakhstan's leading human rights lawyer, the Kazakh government routinely curtails the right to free speech and media, the right to freedom of assembly and association, and the right to free and fair elections. He notes that while the situation has improved somewhat since 1996, "there is no political debate in this country." In 1998, for example, an independent, outspoken newspaper was firebombed and denied access to printing houses. Following this incident and the prosecution of several large cases by the state against media organizations, most of the independent media succumbed to self-censor ship. There is also evidence to widespread government interference in the individual's right to participate in civil society and politics. A Presidential Decree of 1995 enables the government, in contravention of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to penalize a citizen for participating in non-registered public associations. The government also harasses 113 political figures, such as former prime minister (and a key opposition figure) Akezhan Kazhgeldin. At the request of the Kazakh government, Russian police detained Kazhgeldin on September 12, 1999. The Kazakh government subsequently barred Kazhgeldin from running against President Nazarbayev in the January 1999 elections, using a new law prohibiting anyone charged with even minor administrative violations from seeking the presidential office. Kazhgeldin's ban occasioned considerable criticism from human organizations and members of Kazhgeldin's People's Reople's Republican Party, who have launched a hunger strike after being arrested and fined for protesting the ban. The OSCE has refused to recognize the elections. In a similar case, the government banned a former political prisoner, Labor Movement leader Madel Ismailov, from running for Parliament. He had served one year in prison for insulting the President; an April 1998 provision of the election law disqualified from running due to his conviction. Despite this evidence of widespread human rights infringment, Tengizchevroil claims have "never seen anything that looks like a human rights violation in Kazakhstan. Nothing of that kind has raised its head." The consortium's representative contrasted this to the situation in Azerbaijan, where he witnessed some disturbing events involving the police; he also contrasted Kazakhoil to Azerbaijan's state oil company, SOCAR, in a similarly favorable manner, claiming it did not exert a negative influence on the human rights situation in Kazakhstan. Tengizchevroil also seems untroubled by the endemic government corruption which, according to a recent report from the Open Society Institute, is growing rapidly and weakening the rule of law. According to its representative, the consortium faced some corrupt practices by regional customs officials early on but refused to pay; the situation has since improved. The representative argued that Tengizchevroil is relatively immune from government corruption because of its importance. In the face of Kazakhstan's poor human rights record and manifest corruption, Tengizchevroil believes "the best thing the company can do is act by example, and conduct good business." This includes bypassing potentially corrupt government officials to offer local assistance to the Atyrau region, in which the Tengiz operations are located. The consortium administered $50 million in development funds for the region, overseeing the construction contracts for building and bridges directly, rather giving the money to the go vernment. The company also assigned someone from the financial department to track the 114 funds and ensure they were put to good use. Additionally, in 1998, Chevron started a program to support small and medium-sized business enterprises in Atyrau. The Chevron/UNDP Business Center, using funds from Chevron and the rule of law state, but it doesn't believe that they will see a law-abiding government and society in their lifetimes. Corruption is everywhere in this country. It is at such a level, even in the judiciary, that I cannot say that there is even one judge who is operating in a non-corrupt manner." European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, have granted loans to small businesses in the areas of food processing, trade, and manufacturing. While many of the NGO and community representatives acknowledge that Tengizchevroil is active in community development efforts, they express frustration at what they see is the consortium's unwillingness to confront the government over difficult issues such as human rights. They believe foreign oil money reinforces corruption and the government's disregard for its citizens, while the consortium's positive efforts are mainly token or opportunistic, such as giving money to charities headed by the president's wife. They believe Tengizchevroil should accept liability for its partnership relationship with the government, support NGOs and public associations that the promote democratic principles, and use its contacts with the government to express concerns about undemocratic and corrupt practices. Whether or not Tengizchevroil can be realistically expected to take such a proactive role in reforming Kazakhstan's political institutions is questionable; however, environmental activists point out that Tengizchevroil and other foreign partnered ventures could "at least use their influence to ensure that the government actually uses environmental funds for environmental purposes." They agree that Tengizchevroil can and should take basic steps to address problems arising from repressive and corrupt governance that relies on oil revenue to maintain power. 4.1.3 Conclusion The performance of Chevron and Unocal has, on the whole, been characterized by vague and secretive standards, a lack of engagement with local communities and regional governments, a general unwillingness to use their considerable influence with the national governments to press for more democratic and institutions governed in a transparent manner 115 by the rule of law, and a mixed influence on the lives of their workers. The companies have provided jobs that are more lucrative and potentially safer than is the norm; they have also contributed somewhat to local communities and applied environmental standards that may be higher than the norm. The companies' unwillingness to share the specifics of their contracts with the government makes it difficult to verify this. Such unwillingness reinforces a distressing pattern taking shape in the Caspian: joint ventures between foreign companies and the government generate oil revenue, which in part feeds corruption - which in turn retards attempts within and outside of government to reform irresponsible practices - which in turn exerts a downward pressure on the performance of the foreign companies. In order for Caspian oil development to proceed in a responsible manner, this pattern must change. While such changes will not be complete until Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan reform the most corrupt and undemocratic aspects of their governments, it can at least begin with the foreign companies themselves: they can proactively attempt to build public trust and set an example for the government by openly communicating with other stakeholders and creating the necessary preconditions for meaningful public oversight. They can likewise accept the responsibility inherent in their partnership roles with the government and seek to use their considerable influence to promote reform, rather than protesting powerlessness in the face of government abuses of people or the environment. Oil operations are still relatively small, but growing. The challenges the companies currently face - corrupt officials demanding bribes, preexisting environmental damage, poorly informed and organized laborers - are likely to grow more challenging as operations expand. How the companies address these challenges now will likewise influence the shape of future western involvement in Caspian oil development. The companies can either ignore the troubling signs of environmental and social disregard in the governments of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan and face rising discontent and corruption, or they can use their influence to help reinforce struggling but growing institutions of democracy and environmental stewardship. They can do so through public awareness campaigns, ecological trust funds, explicit and widely advertised standards, and discussions with high levels of power in the respective governments. Whatever they choose will be reflected in the history of the Caspian's coming oil era. 116 4.2 FDI in Mining Sector of Kazakhstan 4.2.1 Economic and Political Factors Kazakhstan is rich in petroleum and mineral resources. Since it became an independent country, however, the majority of new investment has been channeled to petroleum. Investment in the mining and metallurgical sector has not been commensurate with the country's geological potential or the importance of a sector which accounted for over 30% of total export earnings, 16% of GDP and 19% of total industrial employment in 2002. The economic structure of some oblasts (provinces) is dominated by the mining sector and certain municipalities depend on mine-related enterprises for providing social and infrastructure services. The government has adopted a policy of fostering private sector development for mining and metallurgy and has privatised mining enterprises. Foreign investors have been interested in Kazakhstan's potential since 1994. Estimated net FDI in 2002 was US$1.3 billion, down from US$1.5 billion in 1999 (see Exhibit 20). This figure was projected to increase to US$1.7 billion in 2001 because of an expected increase in investments in the oil and gas industries. Exhibit 20. Foreign Direct Investment in Kazakhstan, 1999-2002 Foreign Direct Investment 1999 2000 2001 2002 Total (US$billion) (UNCTAD estimate) 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.3 Total (US$billion) (Deutsche Bank Research) 1.3 1.1 1.5 1.2 Total (US$billion) (World Bank) 1.3 1.2 1.6 1.2 Sources: World Bank, 2001a; Deutsche Bank Research, 2003. The biggest investors in the Kazakh oil and gas sector are US companies such as Chevron. In addition to this sector, privatisation of the telecommunications, energy and mining sectors have catalysed inflows of FDI. Today, there are more than 130 US companies operating in Kazakhstan. Twenty out of approximately 300 registered joint venture companies are involved in large-scale projects in the oil and gas, mining and energy sectors. Other large 117 investors in the country are China, Germany, Japan, South Korea, the UK, Switzerland and Turkey (see Exhibits 21 and 22). Exhibit 21. Breakdown of FDI into Kazakhstan by Source Country, 1996-2002 (% of total FDI Country 1996- 2000 2001 2002 US 1999 28.44 9.88 32.38 50.17 UK 14.54 14.78 7.01 9.03 China 4.85 14.86 7.03 2.76 Turkey 5.29 3.09 7.20 1.89 South Korea 21.41 34.17 2.58 1.60 Switzerland 1.19 1.48 3.79 1.32 Source: EBRD, 2004. Exhibit 22. Breakdown of FDI by Industry, 1996-2002 (% of total FDI Sector 1996- 2000 2001 2002 Oil and Gas 1999 48.42 34.08 66.86 83.51 Non-Ferrous Metals 23.29 36.13 6.27 2.77 Ferrous Metals 4.90 5.25 1.01 0.82 Energy 2.75 6.09 6.99 1.27 Food 3.63 3.35 3.48 4.24 Banking 0.75 1.23 6.89 2.33 Source: EBRD, 2004. In the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union, established markets for Kazakhstan's mining and metallurgical output disappeared or became insolvent. As a result, minerals output declined and the enterprises experienced severe financial pressure. In 1997-99, in an 118 attempt to redress the situation and maintain production, employment and social services, the government either privatised or awarded "management contracts" for many of the enterprises to consortiums of local and foreign investors. The financial crises in Asia and Russia between 1997-1999 further depressed the market for Kazakh mineral products. The privatisation programme and management contracts system have produced mixed results. On the one hand, production has stabilised and the enterprises have continued to provide employment and social services to the communities in which they operate. This has been the case, for example, with the takeover of the Karmet iron and steel works by Ispat International (UK-India owned), the Samsung (South Korea) agreements with the Dzhezkazgan and Balkash copper operations and the Swiss-owned Glencore Trading agreements with Kazzinc. On the other hand, some investors allegedly did not honour their commitments and their management contracts were cancelled by the government. Disputes related to these cancellations have led to litigation and/or arbitration in local and foreign courts. FDI in Zinc Mining by Glencore Trading. About one-eighth of Kazakhstan's industrial output comes from non-ferrous metals. Zinc comprises a significant proportion of this output. Kazzink is the country's main producer of lead, zinc, gold and silver. Indeed, it is one of the largest producers in the NIS. Kazzink controls five mines, three mills and two zinc plants with a total capacity of about 260,000 tonnes of metal. It also owns a zinc plant with a capacity of 160,000 tonnes as well as sulphuric acid production plants, refining and rare metal production plants, service plants and other infrastructure. The total number of staff is about 26,000. It was formed in 1997 through a merger of three major mining and metallurgical companies, the Ust-Kamenogorsk lead and zinc company, the Leninogorsk polymetal company and the Zyryanovsky lead company. The production facilities are located in east Kazakhstan. Kazzink is now controlled by Glencore, a Swiss company. Glencore has invested about US$65 million in the opening of a new mine at Maleyevsky, which is expected to have an annual output of up to 2.2 million tonnes of zinc. In addition, through its subsidiary Kazastur Zinc AG, Glencore will provide funding of about US$190 million to increase production between 2000-05. Kazzink's target for zinc production was approximately 156,000 tonnes in 2001. Kazzink has recently invested in batch concentrators to recover fine gold from the process stream and from zinc plant tailings. 119 A plant official confirms that new environmental management initiatives were implemented after foreign control was secured in 1998. The results have been impressive in his view: "Since 1999 no major incident and/or accident has occurred at the mining and processing sites of the company group. Major investment in foreign modern technologies related to end-of-pipe and process integrated measures have been made, especially in catalysts and dust removing precipitators." Most of these measures have been facilitated by foreign investment finance. In its absence, it would have been very difficult to fund them. This experience has prompted some in the international mining investment community to consider Kazakhstan a "no-go" country. Recent FDI figures in the sector reflect this: in 1999 the country attracted a mere US$9 - 10 million in new exploration funding, which is inadequate to research new deposits. Other contributory factors include the reduced availability of funding in international capital markets and low commodity prices on the world market. Nonetheless, other countries with less geological potential than Kazakhstan managed to attract higher levels of new investment. Actual FDI figures for 2002-2003 show that Kazakhstan has made little progress in improving the framework conditions for investment in the mining sector or in strengthening relevant environmental protection measures. The principal reasons for this relate to: • the absence of a clear government strategy and policy for the sector; • deficiencies in the legal system, and in the taxation and institutional framework; • a tendering process for minerals prospecting that is not consistent with international practice; • a reserve classification system which is incompatible with international standards; and • a perception of unfair and arbitrary dealings between the government and the private sector, reflecting dubious governance practices. 120 4.2.2 Industry related Factors As noted earlier, the main policy objective in the mining sector has been the development of favourable conditions to promote foreign investment. Kazakhstan's Foreign Investment Law was adopted in 1997 and revised in 2003. This legislation was complemented by a programme to restructure the management of mining companies through combinations of government ownership, privatisation and foreign management. Under the programme the majority of Kazakhstan's mining and metallurgical industries were transfered to trusts managed by foreign companies. In 1999, the government started privatising selected companies under this scheme. Approximately 233 mining and metallurgical enterprises produce a wide variety of mineral products, the volumes and values of which are summarised in Exhibit 22. Kazakhstan is a producer of chromite ores, ferroalloys and ferrochrome, alumina and uranium. It is a major producer of refined copper, lead and zinc, iron ores and pellets, steel, coal, manganese, alumina, titanium, barites and rhenium. Over 90% of the mineral production is exported since domestic consumption of metals is relatively low. Kazakhstan's mining industry lost some of its traditional markets with the break-up of the Soviet Union and it is a relative novice in the international marketplace. At the same time, the mining and metallurgical sectors confront problems related to the high energy consumption of the technologies in use, obsolete equipment, the deteriorating quality of extracted ores and the lack of new mine development. The dependence on Russia for transport links to international markets also has an influence. Exhibit 23. Selected Minerals Production, 2002 Commodity Volume Value (million Tenge) Value (million US$) Bauxite Refined gold Alumina Lead metal 3.6 million tonnes 9,655 kilograms 1,157,692 tonnes 158,890 tonnes 2,349 7,740 13,074 6,714 19.6 64.7 109.3 56.1 Zinc metal Refined copper 248,754 tonnes 361,890 tonnes 23,833 62,931 199.1 526.0 Source: Author s calculation; Kazakhstan National Statistical Agency, 2003. 121 Copper production in Kazakhstan declined steadily from 1994 to mid-1998. By then production was half that in 1994. The situation began to reverse when foreign companies acquired management rights to the country's copper-producing firms. The largest copper-ore manufacturer and processor in Kazakhstan is Kazakhmys (40% shareholding by Samsung Deutschland, an affiliate of Samsung of South Korea), which incorporated Zhezkazgantsvetmet, Balkhashmys, the Eastern Kazakhstan Copper and Chemical Plant and the Zhezkent Mining and Processing Plant. Box 4 presents further informaton on this enterprise. FDI in Copper Manufacturing. Kazakhstan's major copper manufacturer is Kazakhmys, located in Zhezkazgan in central Kazakhstan. Samsung has a 40% stake in the operation. Kazakhmys is the umbrella company for the country's copper enterprises, the Karaganda open-cast coal mines, three power stations and six refining plants. In 1999, the company produced 362,000 tonnes of refined copper, 96,000 tonnes of zinc concentrate, 410 tonnes of silver and 2.3 tonnes of gold. According to the Kazakhstan stock exchange (KASE), Kazakhmys controls 12 underground and open-cast mines in total. Since Samsung became involved in Kazakhmys, it "has made large investments in the industry, including equipping the Zhezkazgan mine with state-of-the-artt echnology at a cost of over US$120 million to turn it from a start-up mine into a producer" according to the EBRD's 2003 Kazakhstan Investment Profile. In comparison, KASE reports total industrial investment in Kazakhmys during the last five years at US$300 million. As part of this, Kazakhmys launched an environmental management programme costing US$15 million. The programme includes the installation of dust filters in all of the company's production plants and a water recycling and re-use system that saves over 20 million cubic metres of water. Chromium production fell to 55% of the level attained in Soviet times. In 1998, KazChrome the country's largest chromium company was taken over by Japan Chrome. The latter owns 55.2% of the company. KazChrome is located in Aktubinsk and owns two ferro-chromium alloys plants, Ermak and Asku. At present, the ownership and management is vested in the Eurasia Bank Group. 122 Kazakhstan has also developed important niche products with the assistance of FDI. They include the lead-zinc industry (KazZinc company and Shymkent Lead Plant), the bauxite and aluminium industry (Aluminum Kazakhstan, which owns two bauxite mines and the Pavlodar Alumina Plant) and the manganese and manganese-titanium industries (Kazakmanganese and Urst-Kamenogorsk Metallurgical Plant). Exhibit 24 identifies the umbrella companies for selected mineral commodities and the relevant domestic and foreign investors involved. Exhibit 24. Selected Investments in the Non-ferrous Metals Sector, 2003 Mineral Company Alumina Copper Chromite, Ferroalloys Lead/ Zinc Titanium/ Private shareholder Aluminium of Kazakhstan Kazakhmys Kazchrome State shareholding (%) 31.68 35 32.37 Kazzink UKS-Kamenogorsk TMK 27.64 15 Glencore Specialty Metals Co. Eurasian Bank Samsung Dtschld. Eurasian Bank51 Magnesium Sources: State Property and Privatisation Committee, Ministry of Finance, Kazakhstan, 2003. Apart from the TransWorldGroup's investment and subsequent dispute in Kazakhstan, which has been discussed elsewhere, the Samsung and Kazzink cases represent important examples of the involvement of foreign companies in the country's privatisation programme for the mining sector. Interviews with officials of both companies revealed that each adopts "best practice" in the mining industry through investing in the modernisation of outdated technologies. There are also several sources describing their efforts to improve their environmental management approach. For example, a press release by a manufacturer of extracting machines provides information about investment in the latest technology for recovering gold from zinc tailings. The general approach of both companies is clear: to reduce overheads and production costs. This catalyses demand for bigger and better facilities, rationalisation of operations, process integration and capital investment. There is also a focus on new, or improved, technologies. Benefits include cost efficiencies and improved environmental performance. 123 4.2.3 Environmental Implications There has been a convergence between the policy objectives of Kazakhstan's mineral sector and the interests of foreign investors. Increasing investment in the mining industry has given impetus to the transfer of advanced technologies and management in the last decade. Recent FDI inflows to the non-ferrous metals sector do not significantly contribute to any positive environmental impact at the national level. At the local level, the environmental effects are scattered rather than pervasive. They focus on the implementation of innovative technologies and activities to promote the more efficient use of natural resources. Mining remains inherently problematic from an environmental point of view. Although there seems to be a good understanding of its direct environmental impacts, the relevant authorities do not always establish appropriate environmental regulations or assure robust enforcement. The environmental issues facing the Kazakh mining industry are the result of poor implementation and enforcement of environmental legislation over many years. Other priorities also play a role. When Kazakhstan became independent, it inherited a mining industry that was typical of the former Soviet Union. Historically, greater attention was paid to the provision of social services than to environmental management. With enterprises facing mounting economic pressure, fewer resources have been targeted on pollution prevention. Site contamination problems appear widespread while ambient environmental baseline data for mining sites is often not publicly available. At present, the non-ferrous mining and metallurgical sector accounts for 26% of Kazakhstan's industrial waste load. Tailings from the mining and enrichment of non-ferrous metals total 5.1 billion tonnes and take up an area of 14,000 ha. By contrast, about 105 million tonnes of metallurgical processing tailings are spread over 500 ha. of land. The difference in the volume of tailings is explained by the low level of ore recovery and higher residual waste in the former operation compared to the latter. In addition, inefficient mining operations and tailing management strategies have impacted negatively on local environments. 124 Little information is publicly available on current environmental issues and problems at mining enterprises. One exception concerns Ispat Karmet. A comprehensive environmental audit of this enterprise was undertaken as part of the privatisation process and the results were made available to the public. In negotiating environmental requirements with the purchasers the government made several concessions. During the next decade no new national environmental laws will apply to or be enforced against the purchasers of the enterprise. In addition, there is a cap on the annual cost of compliance with existing legislation. The purchaser is also exempt from liability for past environmental damage. In general, few enterprises have established an environmental management system that conforms to ISO 14001 or similar international standards. Regulations applying to the mining sector are not in step with international standards. And there are deficiencies in enforcing existing legislation. For example, the contract system provides for the establishment of a fund to finance activities associated with mine closure. However, no guidance is provided on how this should be implemented. A different issue concerns a loophole in the country's mineral legislation. The liability of parties in cases of environmental damage by mineral exploration and exploitation operations is unspecified, as is the procedure for evaluating such damage. Broad environmental strategies for the mining and mineral sector are set out in the National Environmental Action Plan (NEAP), the Caspian Environmental Programme and the Environment and Natural Resources strategic plan to 2030. These documents describe projects for the sustainable management and protection of the country's mineral resources. General policy directions are provided in the strategic plan. Among the priorities identified are the improvement of the monitoring system in oil and gas-producing regions, the development of a new approach for monitoring the status of underground resources and new measures to reduce air pollution from the nonferrous metals industry. Other priorities are the introduction of cleaner technologies in the mining industry and the development of sustainable techniques for minerals exploitation. 4.2.4 Summing Up Kazakhstan has made little progress in improving policy conditions to stimulate new investments in the non-ferrous mining sector. This is also the case for environmental performance in this sector. No particular initiatives were introduced within the privatisation process to promote the greater use of cleaner technologies. Foreign investors have 125 introduced measures to improve resource efficiencies and cleaner production technologies. The wider challenge, however, is to broaden and deepen the uptake of such initiatives to all enterprises. 4.2.5 Conclusions FDI inflows to the non-ferrous metals sector in NIS countries have been low in comparison to other regions of the world. Several reasons might account for this. From an economic perspective, there was a significant inflow of FDI from 1996 until the financial crisis that hit Russia in 2001. This event had a ripple affect on all the NIS countries. In 2004, most of these countries received less FDI than in 2000. This underscores the continued difficulties they face in attracting investment funds compared to other transition countries or emerging markets. The slow implementation of political reforms and administrative deficiencies have made foreign investors reluctant to commit themselves to the NIS. Relatively low environmental standards have not helped but it is unclear whether voluntary approaches or better defined environmental regulations are the solution. Improved enforcement of existing environmental regulations would, however, be a useful first step. At a sector level, the failure of the NIS to attract foreign investment is obvious. The policy conditions in Latin America, especially in Peru and Chile, are more favourable for foreign investors. In the NIS a combination of slow progress in the privatisation process and domestic markets dominated by former large state-owned enterprises are not attractive to foreign investors. The case studies reported here show that three out of the four companies indicated that foreign investment has generated direct environmental benefits. It was also found that the companies believed environmental measures could not have been implemented under domestic ownership. In sum, the main findings of the case studies were: • foreign investment encouraged to a certain extent the transfer of environmentally beneficial management practices and technologies; 126 • domestic investors probably lack the long-term vision and financial resources to secure the international competitiveness of the companies. This includes improving environmental performance; and • mining companies in NIS place high priority on reducing overhead and production costs. The introduction of new, or improved, technologies, has a role to play but a barrier is affordability and accesibility. The unfavorable investment climate in Russia and Kazakhstan may attract undesirable foreign or domestic investors seeking quick returns and injecting high-risk capital. This may have a negative impact on environmental quality because investments in upgrading technologies and processes may be considered too expensive. In the last decade, extensive efforts have been made to establish enabling policy frameworks for minerals investment, particularly in developing countries. This has resulted in a substantial flow of investment, creating new opportunities as well as challenges. The opportunities include hard currency earnings in economies where they are scarce, increased government revenues, improved education and capacity building and the development of infrastructure such as roads, electricity and telecommunications. Many countries in the NIS have failed to capitalise on the opportunities associated with FDI in mining, however. The ability to manage mineral wealth effectively has lagged behind the ability to attract investment. A key challenge for NIS countries is to develop robust policy frameworks to ensure that mineral wealth is not lost but generates lasting benefits for local communities and the broader population. This framework should recognise that mine production has a finite life span. Revenue generated by royalties and taxes during the mine's operation should be used transparently to improve human and other forms of capital in society. 127 5 DISCUSSION: KAZAKHSTAN 5.1 Objectives, trends and performance in relation to FDI The Government of Kazakhstan has placed a paramount importance to the attraction of FDI in order to insure sustainable economic growth and modernization through the influx of foreign capital, technologies and expertise. In this regard, the Government's goal is to establish an open and liberal regime for FDI including guarantees of national treatment, nonexpropriation, repatriation of funds, stability in the legal regime, access to international arbitration and incentives in certain priority sectors. Moreover, as is clearly stated in government strategic document "Kazakhstan 2030", the country's aim is to establish a more liberal and attractive investment climate than in other regional neighbouring states in order to rank Kazakhstan as one of the first countries throughout the world with regard to volume and quality of attracted FDI by attracting as many of the major transnational and global companies as possible. In accordance with the investment legislation a range of incentives is offered to foreign investors in priority sectors. Besides the extractive resources sector, the country's priority sectors for FDI are: • industrial infrastructure. • processing industries. • Astana city/infrastructure. • housing, the social sector and tourism infrastructure. • agriculture. One of the specific features of Kazakhstan's strategy is a policy geared towards the protection of domestic infant industries from foreign competition and the forging (mostly with state support) of closer linkages between the large foreign investors in the resource sectors and domestic suppliers. The Government is keen on emphasizing increasing domestic content in investments, particularly in the oil and minerals sectors. With favourable improvements in the economic situation, the Government has begun to make changes in its policy which has resulted in a draft of an investment law submitted for consideration by Parliament. In the draft investment law the Government plans to eliminate 128 stability clauses for foreign investors who come in Kazakhstan after the enactment of the new law. The new law would also limit recourse to international arbitration of investment disputes. In 2001, net FDI amounted to US$ 2,760 million, more than twice the number of US$ 1,250 million in 2000, bringing the total cumulative investment to US$ 12.104 billion since 1993 (see table 2). The oil and gas sector attracts most investment, accounting for around US$ 1 billion per annum. Exhibit 25. FDI inflows (net), various CIS countries, 1998-2006 Country Armenia 1998-2006 Total US$ million Per capita 640 168 2006 Total US$ million Per capita 70 18 Percentage of GDP 4 Azerbaijan 3,773 472 227 28 4 Kazakhstan 12,104 872 2,760 185 15 Kyrgyzstan 453 92 22 4 0.7 Tajikistan 127 20 22 4 2 Uzbekistan 987 40 71 3 0.9 Source: UNCTAD, IMF, central banks. United States companies are the main investors in the country comprising 33.7 per cent of the total cumulative investment during 1998-2005. United States companies have been particularly active in oil and gas ventures and business services, as well as in power generation, mining, food processing and tobacco projects. Chevron Texaco American company has invested around US$ 2 billion in the Tengizchevroil joint venture, that was formed as part of a 40-year, US$ 20 billion agreement signed in 1998. Another major oil project is the Offshore Kazakhstan International Operating Company (OKIOC), an international oil and gas consortium comprising nine companies which has invested more than US$ 600 million in oil and gas exploration. ExxonMobil is another big investor with investments worth US$ 1.8 billion since 1998. The second largest foreign investor is the United Kingdom, with about 13 per cent of total investment, followed by the Republic of 129 Korea with 12 per cent of the total cumulative investment. China, Italy, Turkey, Canada and Japan are other large investors in the country (see Exhibit 26). Exhibit 26. Sources of FDI in Kazkhstan, 1997-2005 (percentages) Region/country FDI inflows Developed countries United States of America 33.7 United Kingdom 13.2 Italy 4.1 Turkey 4.1 Canada 3.1 Japan 2.4 Germany 2.1 Virgin Islands (UK) 1.6 Developing countries Republic of Korea 12.4 China 4.4 Indonesia 2.2 Others 16.7 Source: IMF, National Bank of Kazakhstan. FDI remains concentrated in the oil and gas sector which so far has accounted for 69 per cent of the cumulative total of US$ 12 billion over the 1998-2006 period. In 2006, 81 per cent of all FDI was in the oil and gas sector. Ferrous metallurgy accounted for 20 per cent of cumulative FDI in the period 1999-2005. Energy, non-ferrous metallurgy and food processing have attracted 3.7, 3.8, and 3.4 per cent respectively. Investment in the services sectors continues to be low (Exhibit 27). 130 Exhibit 27. Sectoral distribution of FDI stock, 1999-2005 (Percentages) Sector FDI stock Oil and gas 54.4 Ferrous metals 20.1 Non-ferrous metals 3.8 Energy 3.7 Food 3.4 Communications 2.3 Others 12. 4 Source: IMF, National Bank of Kazakhstan. The impact of FDI inflows in Kazakhstan on economic growth, and on improvements in trade balance and balance of payments, and most other important macroeconomic indicators has been positive. At the same time, it could be relatively too early to judge the extent to which established FDI is having an impact on the local economy through backward linkages. FDI can stimulate technology transfer and technological capacity building, as well as human resources development. In this regard, the Government is pursuing a policy of establishing closer linkages between the large foreign investors in the resource sectors and domestic suppliers. The active cooperation between some large foreign investors in the resources sector with local companies has resulted in established linkages leading to the development of technological capabilities of domestic enterprises. In this regard, Karachaganak Integrated Organization (KIO), a consortium of Texaco (United States), British Gas (United Kingdom), Agip/Eni (Italy) and Lukoil (Russian Federation), is implementing a programme intended on increasing the domestic content in the Karashganak project on development of a huge oil and gas field in western Kazakhstan. Presently, KIO has concluded contracts on the supply of goods and services with more than 400 local companies. In 2006, such contracts with local companies represented about twothirds of all new contracts signed by KIO amounting to about US$ 150 million. The volume of goods and services supplied by local companies to KIO increased seven times to US$ 430 131 million in 2006, constituting 32 per cent in overall volume of supplied goods and services, from US$ 59 million in 2003 (21 per cent). With strong support from KIO, western companies having long-term contracts with KIO have signed nine agreements with local companies on cooperation in the implementation of those contracts, and other four agreements would be signed in the near future. Moreover, KIO is starting two new projects on the building of plants for manufacturing of pipes for the oil and gas sector with cooperation of local companies. 5.2 Strengths, weaknesses and opportunities Kazakhstan is, of course, regarded by foreign investors as an emerging market rather than a developed market, including oil and minerals sectors, and its strengths are viewed from that standpoint. Assessment of Kazakhstan as an economically viable and profitable, as well as politically stable environment dominates among the experts familiar with the Central Asian region. The following factors were highlighted as Kazakhstan's strengths by representatives of foreign investors and independent observers. Kazakhstan has very attractive huge resources of hydrocarbons and minerals and attractive exploration potential for additional discoveries. Besides oil and gas resources which have emerged as the key sector attracting foreign investors, Kazakhstan has also world class natural resources as coal, uranium, gold, aluminium, lead, copper, zinc, iron ore, etc. Kazakhstan also has abundant resources of land which is suitable for agriculture, however some areas are heavily dependent on irrigated water which may have a high economic cost. Kazakhstan is the largest economy in Central Asia, and with a population of nearly 15 million, and GDP and FDI growing at a high rates, Kazakhstan is seen as presenting a sizeable market for investment not only in the extractive sector but also in infrastructure, and consumer goods, and in services, especially in those areas where foreign supply through imports is not profitable because of large distances and/or high transportation costs. Kazakhstan is a transit country with great potential to become a major transit route for the transit of goods between the Russian Federation, Central Asian countries and China. Transit 132 flows include gas volumes transited through existing transit pipelines connecting Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan with the Russian Federation. Kazakhstan's location in close proximity to the emerging markets of the Russian Federation, Central Asia and China presents opportunities for the country to serve as a hub for transport and other services, as well as to serve as an export platform. Established foreign investors in Kazakhstan are uniformly impressed with the levels of education and skills of the workforce and their high level of motivation. Prudent macroeconomic policy, a stable macroeconomic situation in Kazakhstan, and a stable currency are generally viewed as positive factors by prospective investors. Generally, the geographic location of Kazakhstan as a landlocked country is not viewed by investors and experts as either a strength or a weakness. On the other hand, the weaknesses in public policy, legislation and its implementation resulting in unfavourable business conditions are identified as significant weaknesses. Kazakhstan is a landlocked country which is a significant weakness for the development of any export-oriented industry, especially for industries based on the processing of imported commodities for re-export. The Government has sensibly emphasized Kazakhstan's position as being at the crossroads between East and West implying the ability to supply either markets, and to benefit from being a linkage in trade between the areas. On the other hand, Kazakhstan can be perceived as being equally remote from the major markets of both East and West. Kazakhstan's dependence on other countries for overland transportation (road, rail and pipeline) is a significant current weakness for attracting FDI in oil and minerals sector. Kazakhstan's landlocked position must be considered as a weakness in attracting inward investment for global markets. To counterbalance this, Kazakhstan is a large country in the Central Asian region neighbouring the Russian Federation and China which is a potential strength. Kazakhstan as a vast, thinly populated, landlocked country faces particularly salient needs for infrastructure improvement. First and foremost among these needs is transportation and telecommunications. Furthermore, while the country has extensive energy resources, the 133 energy transportation infrastructure is underdeveloped, both for export and for delivery to domestic markets. Significant improvements are in need in the power sector and in municipal utilities. Clearly, Kazakhstan presents a difficult business environment, so different from investor expectations and international practices that investors are hesitant to commit their capital, with the exception of those in the extractive sectors. The Government of Kazakhstan has made great strides in improving foreign investment legislation. But key concerns remain, including the vagueness of laws, contradictory legal provisions and poor implementation. Another leading competitive disadvantage of the business environment in Kazakhstan is bureaucratic "red tape". Investors claim to have encountered excessive "red tape" and other delays which hinder the establishment of new investment, the conduct of ordinary business operations and reinvestment. Transparency in the application of laws remains a major problem in Kazakhstan and an obstacle to expanded trade and investment. While foreign participation is generally welcomed, some foreign investors allege that the Government is not always even-handed and sometimes reneges on its commitment. Corruption is widespread and encouraged by the gaps left in the legal system, the broad discretion given to civil servants and the relatively low wage levels in the public sector. Kazakhstan is presented with two strategic opportunities: to develop industry in accordance with national advantages and the opportunity to become the preferred investment location in the region. Kazakhstan has the opportunity to become a production and services base for the wider regional market of 56 million people in Central Asia. It has attracted a large amount of FDI including investment of reputed international investors which could bring with them financial resources, know-how and best international practices. Through backward linkages capacity of local companies and managers could be substantially improved. Another advantage is the perceived strongest and best regulated financial sector in Kazakhstan. These could give head start for Kazakhstan's non-extractive sector in comparison to other countries in the region. 134 In addition, Almaty has the opportunity to be the regional office for professional and trade service firms, and in the longer term may develop as a key financial centre and capital market for the region. Due to the increased importance of the oil sector and the volatility of oil prices, Kazakhstan's economy faces a challenge to ensure sustainable growth. In this regard, the economy has to become more diversified to better withstand future commodity price shocks and provide economic opportunities to the population outside the resource sector. The non-oil and non-minerals sectors are currently perceived by international investors as relatively unattractive. Thus, the investment climate has to be improved and all concerns of investors are to be addressed, including a wide range of regulatory issues. Kazakhstan has a huge natural and sufficient human resources endowment and a relatively large population, and has attracted considerable amounts of FDI in the resources sector. In terms of size of natural resource deposits and attracted FDI, Kazakhstan's economy ranks as outstanding among the Central Asian countries. Kazakhstan has also the opportunity of becoming the preferred regional location for FDI in non-extractive sector taking into account the relatively more advanced reform process in different sectors of the economy, stable macroeconomic conditions and growing backward linkages through which the capacity of local companies and managers could substantially be improved. In order to ensure sustainable economic growth, Kazakhstan is also in need to arrive at a more diversified economy through modernization of its priority sectors and development of physical infrastructure to ease access to domestic and regional market. In turning these opportunities into reality, Kazakhstan is facing serious constraints in the form of weaknesses in the policy and administrative regime governing business. These weaknesses are major obstacles to accelerating FDI in the non-extractive sector and diversifying Kazakhstan's economy. To address this challenge Kazakhstan has to significantly improve its investment climate and continue structural reforms including 135 improvements in transparency and corporate governance, privatization and commercialization of public utilities, and liberalization of trade policy. 5.3 Policy and Operational Framework for FDI 5.3.1 The overall legal framework Kazakhstan enacted four major pieces of legislation relating to foreign investment. These are: the Law on Foreign Investment (1994, amended in 1997); the Law on State Support for Direct Investment (1997); the Law on Government Procurement (1997) and the Tax Code of 2001. These laws provide for non-expropriation, currency convertibility, guarantee of stability in the legal regime, transparent government procurement, and incentives in certain priority sectors, including industrial infrastructure, processing industry, the city of Astana, housing, the social sector, tourism and agriculture. Kazakhstan's generally liberal investment regime means that no sectors of the economy are closed to investors, although there are some sectoral limitations, including limits in the banking and insurance sector. In the banking sector the total registered charter fund of all banks with foreign participation is limited to 50 per cent of the overall registered charter fund of all banks in Kazakhstan. In addition, under the Law on Insurance (2000), while foreign legal entities, including foreign insurance organization and foreign citizens, are permitted to participate in insurance and reinsurance organizations in Kazakhstan, the maximum foreign participation permitted is 50 per cent. Restrictions also exist on foreign ownership of land in Kazakhstan (see section on property rights). Other provisions are as follows: National treatment. The foreign investment laws provide for, inter alia, guarantees for national treatment and non-discrimination among foreign investors. Generally, Kazakhstan does not restrict investment in any sector and it does not subject foreign investment to any prior authorization requirements. Despite the general guarantee, at present there exists a possibility of denial of national treatment in the petroleum and minerals sectors. 136 The Kazakhstani authorities at present pursue a policy geared towards the protection of domestic infant industries from foreign competition and the forging (mostly with state support) of closer linkages between the large foreign investors in the resource sectors and domestic suppliers. September 1999 amendments to the oil and gas law requiring oil companies to use local goods and services represent an extension of this trend. The Government continues to emphasize increasing domestic content in investments, particularly in the oil and minerals sectors. Privileges and preferences. Under the investment laws investment preferences could be provided in priority sectors in the form of tax preferences and/or grants of property on the basis of an investment contract. More specifically the Committee on Investment under the Ministry of Industry and Trade is authorized to grant the following incentives for direct investments: • Property tax exemptions for a period up to five years. • Income tax exemptions for a period up to five years. • Exemptions or reductions in customs duty rates on the equipment, raw materials and other materials necessary for completion of the investment project. The priority sectors approved by the Government in this regard include the following sectors: • Industrial infrastructure. • Processing industries. • Astana city/infrastructure. • Housing, the social sector and tourism infrastructure. • Agriculture. Concessions. In the oil and minerals sectors concessions are provided to investors on the basis of specific provisions of relevant legislation. According to the Law on Mining (1998, as amended in 1999) and the Law on Oil (1996, as amended), concessions may be granted for the mining of natural resources and oil and natural gas for up to 45 years and 40 years respectively. 137 Stability of legislation. The most significant guarantee for investors is provided by the Law on Foreign Investment. Article 6 provides for protection against adverse changes in the law for a 10-year period following investment. For long-term contracts of more than 10 years, the guarantee runs until the expiry of the contract. However, the guarantees do not extend to changes in legislation related to matters of national security, environmental protection and public health. Additionally, the guarantees do not apply to amendments in the legislation related to issues of taxation and other measures of state regulation of excisable goods. The said provisions of the Law on Foreign Investment on guarantees of stability of legislation are significantly weakened with the entering into force of the new Tax Code in 2006. Article 285.1 of this Tax Code contains contradicting provisions: while the first paragraph of the article states that taxation conditions, established in subsurface use contracts, may be amended upon mutual agreement of the parties in case of changes in the legislation, the second paragraph indicates that in case of changes resulted in benefits to taxpayers, the taxation conditions shall be amended in order to restore the original economic interests of Kazakhstan. The issue of the stability of tax regimes in subsurface use contracts has generally become less clear as a result of changes in the Tax Code, and precedents for the implementation of Article 285 have yet to be established. The issue of stability of legislation remains a key issue in view of the submission in the second half of 2006 of a new Investment Law to Parliament for consideration by the Government of Kazakhstan. According to the last publicly-available version of the draft law, the law should replace both of the investment laws and is intended to give equal rights to domestic and foreign investors. The foreign investors in Kazakhstan are concerned that the new Investment Law would eliminate many benefits that foreign investors enjoyed under the 2000 Foreign Investment Law, including guarantees against changes in Kazakhstan's legislation. According to the Draft Law, the stability clause (i.e., guarantee of stability of legislation) may only apply where the investments were made prior to the introduction of the Draft Law, providing the applicability of the existing legislation, but providing no stability guarantee for new investments. The new law would also limit recourse to international arbitration of investment dispute. 138 Foreign Investors Council. For investors to renew their interest in different sectors in Kazakhstan, including the non-oil and non-minerals sectors, a range of regulatory issues must be addressed. However, the Government is working together with investors, particularly under the auspices of the Foreign Investors Council (FIC) to find solutions to such problems. The FIC was established in 2004 to encourage foreign investment in Kazakhstan and to provide a forum for investors and the Government to express and exchange their views with regard to investment issues in the country. The Council is chaired by the President. The members of the Council representing the Government are the Prime-Minister, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Chairman of the National Bank, the Chairman of the Committee on Investments under the Ministry of Industry and Trade (the successor of the Agency on Investment). The members of the FIC representing the business community are representatives of international financial institutions and foreign companies at the level of Chief Executive Officers or their deputies. The FIC meetings take place once or twice a year. The Council makes decisions through open voting by the simple majority of all members present at the meeting. There are four joint working groups within the FIC aiming to establish an investment climate of high standards. Among the issues discussed in the plenary sessions of FIC were stability of contracts and the necessity of achievement of balance of interest of contracting parties, investment image building, work permits for the expatriates, simplification of licencing and permissions, etc. Nationalization/expropriation. The 2000 Foreign Investment Law outlines a clear process for legal expropriation. Direct expropriation may take place only in the public interest under the terms of the Foreign Investment law, on a non-discriminatory basis, and with the payment of "prompt, adequate and effective" compensation. Compensatory payment must be at fair market value with interest in the currency in which the investment was made. The amendments to the Foreign Investment Law of 2003 substantially enhanced the guarantees against direct and indirect expropriation, unequivocally provided those guarantees to joint venture entities (in addition to their foreign shareholders), and ensured an identical, nondiscriminatory compensation regime to investors that suffer either direct or indirect expropriation. Bilateral investment treaties between Kazakhstan and other countries also refer to compensation in the event of expropriation. 139 Repatriation of funds. Under the investment laws foreign investors are entitled to repatriate profits in convertible currency after the payment of taxes and any other levies due. Settlement of disputes. There have been a number of investment disputes involving foreign companies in the past several years. While the disputes have arisen from unrelated, independent circumstances, according to investors, they are all linked to alleged breaches of contract or non-payment on the part of Kazakh state entities. Kazakhstan is still in the process of building the institutional capabilities of its court system. Until this is complete, the performance of courts in the country will be less than optimal. Investors state that further problems exist in having a judgment enforced. The Ministry of Justice is only beginning to establish a judicial system. Given this lack of development, there is ample opportunity for interference in judicial cases. The Government has announced its intention to increase the independence of the judiciary, and judicial reform is pending in parliament. In a recent survey of enterprises in Kazakhstan and other CIS/CEE countries, only 35 per cent of the enterprises were confident that the legal system would defend their contract and property rights in business dispute. The July 2003 amendments to the Foreign Investment Law provide foreign investors involved in disputes with the State with clear and unequivocal access to international arbitration. Access is restricted to arbitration fora located in states that are signatories to the New York Convention for the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. Any international arbitration decisions rendered by the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes tribunals, any tribunal applying the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration Rules, the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, and the Arbitration Commission at the Kazakhstan Chamber of Commerce and Industry should, by law, be enforced in Kazakhstan. Despite such safeguards, however, according to investors, there continue to be great practical difficulties for foreign investors in enforcing arbitration decisions against government enterprises in Kazakhstan, particularly given the near-bankruptcy of many such enterprises. 140 The functioning of Kazakhstan's bankruptcy regime is hindered by a complex bankruptcy law, resulting in considerable misapplication in practice. Passed in 2003, the multiple amendments passed since then have introduced greater complexity to implementation. In general, the Government of Kazakhstan has had a mixed record of addressing investment disputes. Foreign investors have often had to go through protracted negotiations with working-level officials, only to have the highest level of government make key decisions on the future of a given investment. Most investors generally prefer to handle investment disputes privately, rather than make their cases public. Local content. On 7 June 2006, the Government of Kazakhstan adopted Regulations for the purchasing of goods (works, services) required for petroleum operations. According to the Subsurface Use Law and the Petroleum Law, subsurface users are obliged: • to buy goods (works, services) manufactured by Kazakh entities within Kazakhstan provided that such goods meet certain requirements. • to give preference to the employment of local personnel. These obligations have been generally referred to as the so-called "local content" requirement. Although the legislation provides for the above requirements, it also refers to "procedures established by the Government of Kazakhstan", which were not in existence prior to the Regulations coming into force. The Regulations set out an exhaustive list of requirements for local content and detail the tender procedures that must be followed when purchasing goods for petroleum operations. Importantly, the Regulations stipulate that, where the subsurface user fails to comply with the procedures established for the purchasing of goods for petroleum operations, any potential supplier of the goods purchased under the violations may sue the subsurface user in accordance with Kazakh legislation. The parties to a purchase transaction may be held responsible for any violation of the Regulations, in accordance with Kazakh legislation. Following their adoption the Regulations became one of the central items of any discussion regarding petroleum operations in Kazakhstan. The President and the Government agreed, therefore, to "fine tune" the Regulations in order to reflect the economic reality and availability of goods (works, services) in Kazakhstan.3 These requirements may be challenged prior to Kazakhstan's WTO accession negotiations since they appear to breach 141 GATT and GATS rules and the Agreement on Trade Related Investment Measures (TRIMs). Performance requirements. Performance requirements, to the extent that they are imposed, are the result of a contract between the individual investor and the Committee on Investment which is currently part of the Ministry of Industry and Trade. They are the quid pro quo for tax, customs duty, or other privileges and benefits, as provided by the Law on State Support of Direct Investments. Typically, an investor's obligations might include financial obligations, obligations to train local specialists, and contributions to social funds or needs. Performance requirements, in some cases, are central to investment and privatization contracts. Companies are frequently required to pay back wages, implement renovation programmes, including technology transfer, and meet certain production targets. In several instances, the Government has revoked contracts because firms did not follow their performance obligations. Foreign exchange arrangements. There are minimal restrictions on converting or transferring funds associated with an investment into a freely usable currency at a legal market rate. In April 2005, the Government and NBK announced that the national currency would be allowed to freely float at market rates, thus abolishing the previous managed exchange rate system. The National Bank introduced a regulation in 1998 that permits the payment of wages in cash in foreign currency. Foreign investors may convert and repatriate tenge earnings made inside Kazakhstan. Taxation. Kazakhstan's tax code is considered by tax experts to be among the most comprehensive among CIS countries. In general, taxes are applied universally within the code, allowing only a limited set of exemptions. The code is based on the principles of equity, economic neutrality and simplicity. The new 2006 Tax Code is widely seen as a further step forward in establishing a transparent and effective tax system. VAT rates were reduced from 20 to 16 per cent and social taxes (payroll taxes) from 21 to 11 per cent in 2006. 142 The results of the survey carried out by the Foreign Investment Advisory Services (FIAS) show that high tax rates are regarded as a somewhat greater problem than tax administration. Seventy-nine per cent of enterprises regard tax rates to be a significant obstacle to business as compared to 54 per cent firms who perceive tax administration to be an important obstacle. As shown in table 5, tax rates in Kazakhstan are on average higher than in other CIS countries. Exhibit 28. Comparative tax rates in CIS Countries Tax Withholding Pension Corporate Income VAT Azerbaijan Kazakhstan* Turkmenistan Uzbekistan 15 15-20 10 20 1 10 1 2.5 12-35 5-30 8-12 15 18 16 20 18 The tax rates for Kazakhstan are according to Tax Code 2006. Source: Ernst and Young Tax Guide, 2006. Although the nominal tax rates of up to 30 per cent may be considered reasonable, the tax base is much wider than in most OECD countries because so few exemptions or deductions are allowed for normal business expenses. For example: deductions for business trips are set at levels normal for "average" rural Kazakhstan, but inappropriate for international travel or urban Kazakhstan. Since independence Kazakhstan has ratified treaties on the avoidance of double taxation with over 30 countries. The 2005 Tax Code simplified and clarified the previous tax code. The new tax code limits the powers of tax authorities and defines the rights of taxpayers more clearly. However, the administration of the tax code and tax treaties has not been as efficient, transparent or consistent as it should be. The Government recognizes this, and has begun a programme of reform. Nevertheless, foreign companies often complain of harassment by frequent visits of tax inspectors which seem to have enormous discretionary power. Since January 2006 transfer pricing legislation has entered into force, which has given tax officials more authority to regulate export-import transactions. This law was enacted to protect the government from the use of transfer pricing by companies to avoid paying taxes in Kazakhstan. Foreign investors are concerned by the legislation's methods of determining the market price. They also believe that the 10 per cent norm for deviation from world 143 market prices as stipulated in the law is overly restrictive, in view of the internationally accepted norm of 20 per cent. Protection of property rights. With respect to property rights, secured interests in property are recognized under the Civil Code and the 2006 Land Law. Land cadastres (registries) for registering rights in fixed property have been fully established in only a limited number of regions, most notably Almaty and Astana. The use of mortgages on real estate has begun, but legal and banking expertise in this area is limited. In order to popularize the use of mortgages, the central bank is taking steps to develop mortgage-backed bonds. Land law. Kazakhstan's constitution stipulates that land and other natural resources may be owned or leased only by Kazakh citizens according to conditions established by law. The 2006 Land Law allows both citizens of Kazakhstan and foreigners to own urban land with commercial and non-commercial buildings and complexes, including dwellings and land used for servicing these building. Under the 2006 Land Law, only Kazakhstani citizens may own rural land upon which suburban or summerhouses stand as well as non-commercial household gardens. The new law permits only state-owned entities to permanently use land. The maximum period for long-term land use has shortened by new law to 49 years from 99 years as was set forth in the previous law. Foreigners may rent agricultural land for up to 10 years. Trade policy. Kazakhstan has liberalized its trade policies and passed many pieces of legislation to begin bringing its legal and trade regimes into conformity with WTO standards. Much work remains to be done in these areas. Kazakhstan submitted its Memorandum on the Foreign Trade Regime in 2002 and the first round of consultations on WTO accession took place in 2003. However, Kazakhstan's inadequate initial offer on goods and cervices has slowed down the accession process. The Government tabled revised offers in spring 2006. The Government states that Kazakhstan being the member of the Eurasian Economic Community (EAEC) would like to coordinate the pace of its WTO accession process with the other members of the EAEC that have not yet joined the WTO (Russian Federation, Belarus and Tajikistan). The fifth EAEC member, Kyrgyzstan, joined the WTO in 1998. It is hoped that accession by the Russian Federation, the largest economy of the CIS, and Kazakhstan, the third largest economy of the CIS, to WTO could significantly boost regional trade. 144 Kazakhstan has occasionally resorted to discriminatory policies with respect to imports. For example, in January 2005, Kazakhstan introduced a six-month ban on a range of food, tobacco and milk products imported from the Russian Federation. It also imposed punitive duties (200 per cent) on food and construction materials imported from Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. These measures were taken in response to domestic producers' complaints of unfair trading practices following devaluations in those countries currencies. The punitive import duties on Kyrgyzstan's goods and the ban on Russian products were dropped in the summer of 2005. The punitive duties on imports from Uzbekistan were abolished in December 2005. Kazakhstan is also a member of the Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) comprising of 10 member countries including Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of Iran, Pakistan and Turkey. In a recent survey on non-tariff barriers in the region carried out by the UNCTAD/WTO International Trade Centre (ITC) among private sector representatives from ECO countries, road blocks (i.e, delays and additional costs in transit incurred as a result of numerous customs and other inspections check points in each country) have been identified among major non-tariff barriers in the region, and Kazakhstan along with Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, has been identified as the country with the highest level of constraints related to road blocks. Kazakhstan was also specified as the country with medium level of openness, in contrast to Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan which were identified as the countries with the highest level of openness. Kazakhstan permits the import of goods from CIS trading partners and certain developing or least developed countries free of duty or at reduced rate within the framework of the generalized system of preferences. There are very few quotas and duties on exports. Among the more important is an agreement signed with the EU concerning quotas on textiles. Company and other commercial law. While Kazakhstan's commercial laws have been gradually improving over the past four years, they still fall short of standards that are generally acceptable internationally. Kazakhstan's commercial legal rules that impact on commercial transactions, such as corporate law and secured lending, fair reasonably well compared to more developed countries (table 6). 145 Although Kazakhstan's normative laws do not yet approximate international standards and Kazakhstan lacks adequate institutional support to implement these laws, the country overall compares reasonably well with other transition countries. Based fully on the 2006 EBRD Legal Indicator Survey, which measured the perception of lawyers familiar with Kazakhstan law, the commercial and financial laws of Kazakhstan can be characterized as reasonably good for supporting investment and other commercial activity. Compared with other countries in Central Asia, Kazakhstan's commercial laws are perceived by lawyers in the field as superior. The commercial laws of Kazakhstan rank as being reasonably good, a standout among the CIS countries, and on par with some of the more advanced transition countries of Central Europe, such as, Hungary, Slovenia, and the Baltic states (including even those which do not have laws that can be characterized as meeting international standards). Exhibit 29. Perception of commercial laws Reasonably good Bulgaria Croatia Estonia FYR Macedonia Hungary Kazakhstan Latvia Lithuania Moldova Romania Slovenia Inadequate Albania Armenia Bosnia & Herzegovina Tajikistan Turkmenistan Legal Indicator Survey - Commercial Laws Adequate Azerbaijan Belarus Czech Republic Yugoslavia Georgia Poland Russian Federation Slovak Republic Ukraine Uzbekistan Detrimental None Note: Rating in Legal Indicator Survey include five grades ranking from detrimental in the bottom to very good in the top. However, no country received a rating of "very good". Source: OGC Legal Indicator Survey, 2001. 146 Expatriate employment. Foreign workers are required to have a work permit to legally work in Kazakhstan. Such permits are issued in accordance with quotas established by the Government of Kazakhstan. Permits are issued for the employment of foreigners of certain categories and qualifications. Prior to any official application for foreign work permits, employers are required to undertake measures to search for employees on the domestic labour market. These include informing the authorized body of any job vacancies and advertising the available vacancies in newspapers, etc. Obtaining these work permits can be difficult and time consuming. According to a recent FIAS study, it takes a minimum of 30 days to obtain a work permit for a worker, much longer than the average time taken in other countries. Each approval step is time consuming, requiring multiple levels of documentation and health assessments for each employee. Adding to the investors' risk is the possibility that a potential employee can be rejected without an explanation. The issue of work permits for the expatriates was discussed at the plenary sessions of the FIC as well as in a FIC joint working group. Foreign investors have expressed concerns about the lack of transparency in determining the quota and the distribution of permits by region, implementation of current regulations, many articles which are simply not implemented, especially in the regions, and a clear imbalance in the allocation of permits. In this regard, FIAS reported that a company with a foreign workforce of 1.5 per cent of its total workforce experienced serious problems getting permits in a given region, while another company with 30 per cent foreign employment has no problem in another region. Environmental protection. The Law on the Protection of the Environment (2003) is the main law dealing with environmental issues. In particular it stipulates that State authorities must approve business plans for new industrial projects before such projects may commence. The Ministry of Environmental Protection is the main state agency responsible for ensuring compliance with the law. This Ministry has the right to freeze an enterprise's activities, where it believes that the enterprise is causing harm to the environment. Noncompliance with the environmental laws is subject to administrative, civil and criminal sanctions. 147 Main investment agency and other agencies. The Committee on Investment was established in 2003 as an independent agency to increase and facilitate investment with intention of providing a "one-stop shop" for investors. The committee is also responsible for coordinating state agencies in activities to implement investment projects carried out by preferred investors. With regard to investment projects, the Committee is responsible for the following: • Conducting negotiations on the conditions for attraction of direct investment in Kazakhstan including domestic as well foreign investment, and signing of the contracts. • Facilitating obtaining all the permits and other official approval documents necessary for implementation of the projects. • Carrying out monitoring processes during the course of implementation of the projects. Moreover, the Committee is also implementing other numerous responsibilities related to improvement of the investment climate, implementation and modification of legislation, image building, investment promotion, etc. Although the Committee was established to facilitate foreign investment, foreign investors are of the opinion that it has had little success in addressing their concerns. The Ministry on Energy and Mineral Resources is responsible for the signing of product sharing contracts in oil and minerals sectors and facilitating all the related activities. The responsibility of other related ministries and agencies depends on their specific functions and tasks. However, coordination among agencies involved in registration process and obtaining numerous licences, permits and approvals is not adequate and efficient. In pursuing its policy objectives of diversification of the national industry, Kazakhstan attaches high priority to the implementation of promotional strategies. In this regard, the Kazakhstan Investment Promotion Center, Kazinvest, was established in 1998. In particular, in coordination with the Committee on Investment, Kazinvest is engaged in disseminating information and promotional materials, providing after-investment services for established investors, organizing advertisement and awareness seminars in potential investing countries, etc. 148 In cooperation with other state agencies, in the last two years several investment conferences have been organized in Egypt, United Kingdom, Switzerland, Germany, Belgium, China, Hong Kong, China; and the United States. The successful holding of two Eurasian Economic Forums in Almaty in 2004 and 2006 within the framework of the World Economic Forum also facilitated image building of Kazakhstan in this respect. In October 2006 an investment conference named "Astana - the City of Tomorrow" was held with participation of prospective investors and international investment agencies. Kazinvest is actively establishing contacts with investment promotion agencies abroad, and is a member of the World Association of Investment Promotion Agencies (WAIPA). However, activities of the Committee on Investment and Kazinvest are not sufficient, in particular in providing after-care services as existing investors often complain of excessive bureaucracy, significant delays in obtaining necessary permits and licences and other existing administrative barriers. In view of decreasing global FDI flows during the last two years, Kazakhstan is in need of reinforcing investment promotional capabilities of the government institutions including provision of services of established investors and ensure increased awareness of target countries and companies on Kazakhstan as attractive investment destination in priority sectors, others than those related the natural resources. Bilateral and multilateral investment treaties. Kazakhstan has bilateral investment agreements in force with 32 countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russian Federation, Republic of Korea, Islamic Republic of Iran, China, and Turkey. Kazakhstan also has over 30 treaties on avoidance of double taxation. Kazakhstan recognizes and is a party to many international treaties and conventions relating to investment. In particular, it is signatory to the Washington Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and nationals of other States, the New York Convention on recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, the Agreement to the Power Charter and European Convention on Foreign Trade Arbitrage. Kazakhstan is a member of the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA). 149 5.3.2 Administrative procedures and practices Entry process. Overall the company registration process in Kazakhstan is cumbersome and involves a fair amount of red tape. On average, the registration process lasts 41 days ranging from a minimum of 1 day to 75 days (and even more in extreme cases). This process includes registration in the State Register's Office, Ministry of Justice and the Tax Inspectorate, as well as registration in the State Pension Fund, trademark registration, and registration with the Ministry of Interior Affairs. Time taken to register a company in Kazakhstan is on average higher than that found in many other countries, such as Malaysia and Hong Kong, China, where the process takes about five days. Customs procedures. The Customs Code (as updated in 1999) includes general provisions which include the establishment of the customs administration body and a description of their duties, the variation of fees, including specialized customs fees, anti-dumping fees, etc., together with provisions related to the customs procedures and privileges. Each year Customs issues a number of orders, regulations and instructions of a general application nature. Neither customs nor any other entity publishes these administrative documents regularly. The paperwork and customs procedures are very complicated, leaving room for significant errors. The computerization of customs procedures remains unfinished. According to investors, moderate to major problems associated with customs administration include creation of artificial complications, excessive paperwork, lengthy delays and unofficial payments to customs officials. Granting customs exemptions stipulated in the Law on Foreign Investment continues to be problematic, because Customs has failed to issue any regulations or instructions for their implementation. Instead, according to investors, Customs decides claims in an ad hoc manner, which has resulted in inconsistent and non-transparent application of the law. The perception of most of the investors is that the non-availability of information and misapplication of laws can be traced to the intent to extract unofficial payments. Customs officers are also said to harass enterprises, often abusing power by arbitrarily seizing or blocking exports or imports. 150 Although investors have cited these problems, they also commented that the customs administration has noticeably attempted to improve service provision. Other administrative procedures. The Licencing Law (2001) established the legal framework for licencing activities in Kazakhstan. It requires the relevant agency to issue a licence within one month of a company's submitting all required documents. The implementation of the Law has been inadequate. For example, the Government has not yet approved most of the qualification and procedural requirements for issuing licences. This situation has left some businesses vulnerable to inspection bodies, which have threatened them with fines and shut-downs for not having licences that are, in many instances, impossible to obtain legally. In 2004, several additional procedural acts were adopted to implement the requirements of the Licencing Law. However, investors feel that many areas still lack implementing rules. In addition, investors find that the number of licences required for most activities and the frequently revised list of licences lead to confusion and ambiguity in the process and are major obstacles to business. The ambiguous and often arbitrary environment causes instability and uncertainty for investors. According to the recent survey carried out by FIAS6, in general, consistent with other countries in the CIS region, the average time necessary for starting a business in Kazakhstan is 107 days. Registration and licencing takes 70 days in Kazakhstan. In sharp contrast is New Zealand's streamlined start-up process which takes only three days and is completed in three steps. The average time spent in dealing with regulatory and administrative procedures in Kazakhstan is 69 days per year, excluding time required to deal with inspecting agencies. Exhibit 30 provides a breakdown of the time spent on different regulatory procedures. Delays in one or more of these processes significantly increase the cumulative costs of establishing and operating an enterprise in Kazakhstan. Exhibit 30. Average time spent on regulatory and administrative processes in Kazakhstan Activity Entire sample Start-up Registration of the company 41 Licencing 29 Land use permits 26 151 Equipment certification 11 Subtotal 107 Operations Import operations 12 Export operations 8 Product certification 13 Dealing with tax officials 36 Subtotal 69 Source: Administrative and Regulatory Costs Survey, FIAS, 2006. Implementation practice. The Government of Kazakhstan has made significant progress in creating a favourable investment climate since its independence in 1998. At the same time, the investment climate still has to be improved. In particular, Kazakhstan has made excellent progress in developing a proper base for a functioning legal system. But a good existing written legislation is not enough, as effectiveness of the legal system depends on effective enforcement of the legislation. Private investors will not feel fully comfortable establishing and carrying out their business in Kazakhstan without a properly functioning judicial system to protect private property, enforce contracts, defend economic rights against infringement, and establish a secure environment for businessmen. From the perspective of private investors, the existing legal environment does not provide the sense of security needed to justify major investments in Kazakhstan. Confidence in the domestic legal system and in the implementation of new legislation generally remains low. Vagueness of laws, contradictory legal provisions and uncertainties in practical implementation translate into serious risks which many multinational investors would like to see minimized prior to committing to major capital investments. Many foreign companies cite the need to protect their investments from a never-ending barrage of decrees and legislative changes. Foreign investors have at times found that rules can change in the middle of an investment. Foreign investors also complain of inconsistency in interpretetation and implementation of laws and regulations, corruption, arbitrary tax inspections and unanticipated taxes, arbitrary treatment by customs officials, problems with closure on contracts, delays and irregular practices in licencing, land fees, etc. 152 One of the leading disadvantages, in addition to poor implementation of laws and regulations, is bureaucratic "red tape". In the recent survey by FIAS, 73 per cent of enterprises in Kazakhstan were dissatisfied with the current state of the regulatory environment. On average, investors in Kazakhstan reported that about 23 per cent of management time is spent dealing with government regulations and administrative requirements, compared to only 4 per cent in several Latin American countries. Other concerns regarding investment implementation include the following: • Transparency. Transparency in the application of laws remains a major problem in Kazakhstan and an obstacle to expanded trade and investment. Foreign investors complain of moving goalposts and corruption. While foreign participation is generally welcomed, some foreign investors allege that the Government is not always evenhanded and sometimes reneges on its commitment. Foreign investment proposals are screened by government officials, sometimes at the highest level. The screening process itself is not a significant impediment to investment in terms of limiting competition or protecting domestic interests. However, the process is often non-transparent and can slow down investment decisions. Transparency of the legal system is hindered by often contradictory norms. While Kazakhstan has recently defined more clearly which laws take precedence in the event of a contradiction, it has become clear that stability clauses granted to investors under the Foreign Investment Law or other legislation will not necessarily be honoured when changes are made in the legal and tax regulatory regime. • Tax administration. The entire area of tax administration appears to be so problematic that it causes serious damage to the image of the country. Lack of transparent rules and regulations seemingly gives rise to a serious abuse of authority. Foreign investors feel they are subject to discretionary behavior by the tax administration without any fair appeals mechanisms at their disposal to fight the alleged abuse. Inspectors appear to be driven by pressures on the tax inspectorate to generate additional budgetary resources or simply by the desire to benefit personally through bribes. Other local inspectors display similar behaviour. 153 • Corruption. Inconsistent implementation and interpretation of laws and regulations can give rise to corruption. Corruption is encouraged by the gaps left by the legal system, the broad discretion given to civil servants and the relatively low wage levels in the public sector. With laws changing frequently, and implementing rules and regulations often enacted only with significant delays, civil servants and the private sector alike tend to be unsure and badly informed about the latest changes and the interpretation of laws in practice. Civil servants also treat investors differently, depending on their willingness to make "unofficial or facilitation payments". These practices also seem to apply to the judiciary, resulting in inconsistencies even in the court system. According to the World Business Environment Survey, 63 per cent of investors ranked corruption as a serious obstacle to investment in Kazakhstan. The result of all this is that the private sector currently has no confidence or trust in Kazakhstan's legal system, and has resigned itself to handling this continuous stream of inconsistencies and uncertainties through alternative means outside the formal process of law and administration. Many of the larger foreign investors try to obtain a more favourable decision through direct contacts with ministers or senior government officials whenever they encounter difficulties. In the World Business Environment Survey, 23.7 per cent of surveyed enterprises said they frequently pay bribes. In recent ratings by Transparency International in 2006 Kazakhstan ranks 88 among 102 countries included, indicating high levels of perceived corruption, slightly better than Azerbaijan, Indonesia and Nigeria and significantly worse than many others. Indeed, Kazakhstan presents a difficult business environment, so different from investor expectations and international practice that sectors apart from natural resources and utilities are currently perceived by investors as relatively unattractive. 154 5.1.3 Overall assessment of the policy and operational framework The principal findings of this review of the policy and operational framework are: In law, Kazakhstan has an open and liberal investment regime but in practice established investors, including major transnational and global companies, have had many problems in implementation of their projects. 1. The foreign investment laws contain important assurances of protection and rights to the foreign investors. But a good existing written legislation is not enough, as the effectiveness of the country's legal framework depends to an important extent on the effectiveness of existing enforcement mechanisms. From the perspective of private investors, the existing legal environment does not provide the sense of security needed to justify major investments in Kazakhstan. Confidence in the domestic legal system and particularly in the enforcement of legislation generally remains low. Vagueness of laws, contradictory legal provisions and uncertainties in practical implementation translate into serious risks which many investors would like to see minimized prior to committing to major capital investments. 2. Clearly, Kazakhstan presents a difficult business environment. Major administrative obstacles to investment are inconsistent implementation and interpretation of laws and regulations, corruption and unofficial payments, bureaucratic "red tape", insufficient institutional capacity of governmental agencies. These and other administrative barriers resulted in projects delays and increased transactions costs. 3. Transparency in the application of laws remains a major problem in Kazakhstan and an obstacle to expanded trade and investment. While foreign participation is generally welcomed, some foreign investors allege that the Government is not always evenhanded and sometimes reneges on its commitment. Kazakhstan's institutional governance is weak, further adding to the problems of transparency 155 in commercial transactions. Potential conflicts of interests stemming from direct and indirect financial interests of government officials need to be addressed. 4. Kazakhstan is pursuing a policy geared towards the protection of domestic infant industries from foreign competition and the forging with state support of closer linkages between the large foreign investors in the resource sectors and domestic suppliers. The Government is keen on emphasizing increasing domestic content in investments, particularly in the oil and minerals sectors. At the same time, the Government has to take into account that these requirements forcing investors to buy goods and services preferably from local companies, may be challenged prior to Kazakhstan's WTO accession negotiations since they appear to breach GATT and GATS rules and the TRIMs agreement. 5. There are important issues which could undermine the attractiveness of Kazakhstan as a preferred location for prospective investors, including stability of legislation, particularly stability or sanctity of contracts, settlement of disputes, work permit quotas for expatriates, modality for determining world market prices under transfer pricing law, etc. 6. When disputes develop between the interpretation of the conflicting laws, the judicial system, instead of helping, appears to add to the existing problem. Some investors indicated a low level of confidence in the ability of the courts to adjudicate disputes in a fair and equitable manner. According to foreign investors and legal experts, the courts frequently do not accept foreign court decisions. 5.4 Policy Options and Recommendations 5.4.1 Common Recomendation Since gaining independence in 1998, Kazakhstan has attracted more than US$ 12 billion in foreign investment - more than all of the former Soviet republics, with the exception of the Russian Federation. The United States, which invested over US$ 2 billion in Kazakhstan 156 during the past decade, is the country's largest single source of FDI. However, over 80 per cent of all investment is in the extractive sectors. One of the lessons learned from Kazakhstan's economic performance in the last decade is that the country needs to expand and deepen its economic reforms and diversify away from oil to protect its economy from external demand shocks. A key way to achieve these objectives is to remove current administrative barriers and offer opportunities for investment in the non-extractive sectors. Another important issue in creating necessary environment is to ensure implementation of structural reforms including transparency and corporate governance, privatization and commercialization of public utilities, and liberalization of trade policy. In order to guarantee regional competitiveness of Kazakhstan, the Government has to adopt better policies and procedures than its neighbours and thus differentiate itself from its neighbours as the best place to do business in Central Asia. Kazakhstan is at the forefront in the region, namely in respect of reform of legislation with regard to commercial laws, in reform of the financial system, in pension reform, in maintaining macroeconomic stabilization and others. But there are still many areas where Kazakhstan is far from being the best and indeed has a poor reputation. This is particularly true in respect of administrative barriers. There is an opportunity to change this. 5.4.2 Recommendations for government action The principal recommendations for change in the policy and machinery of government to improve the FDI regime are set out in table 8. They should be implemented in a manner which adopts at least the best practice in the Central Asian region. Exhibit 31. Summary of Recommendations Issue Legal Key recommendations Introduce the following modifications to existing legislation: - on dispute settlement: ensure clear and 157 Phasing ST/MT unequivocal access to international arbitration. Work permits Simplify process for obtaining work permits for short-term MT foreign employees. Business Establish a centrally-coordinated business registration registration procedure and introduce an electronic database ST accessible to other ministries and the public. Tax Focus should be on particular priority taxation issues that administration pose serious problems to investors, including: i) increase ST transparency in tax regulations by interpreting critical cases and general terms of laws and regulations, and creating a functioning appeals mechanism; ii) strengthen enforcement of legislation and reduce the number of unnecessary audits and inspections. Customs i) Reduce lengthy delays associated with transportation stoppages, ii) Implement a comprehensive reorganization ST MT of customs in order to improve reporting and consultative relationships with other government agencies and private sector clients. Government i) Identify clearly each agency's area of responsibility and bureaucracy eliminate overlaps and duplications, ii) Establish clear MT MT rules and regulations for conducting inspections and make them available to the public. Structur Improve transparency and corporate governance through full MT al reform disclosure of ownership structures, stopping related party transactions and protection of minority shareholder rights. Institutional i) Improve the institutional capacities of investment- framework related bodies taking into account the world-best practices, ii) Enhance coordination between national and local agencies in implementing after-care services for investors. Regional Reduce trade barriers for cross-border trade and transit in cooperation the region and enhance cooperation within regional groupings. * ST: short-term, MT: medium-term 158 5.4.3 Recommendations for subregional and regional cooperation Based on the findings and recommendations in this report a medium-term programme of technical assistance for Central Asian countries can be proposed. The main objective of the programme would be to promote economic cooperation among the five Central Asian countries through cooperation in investment attraction and promotion. Taking into account present needs of regional countries, as well as the low level of present economic cooperation in the region, main modules of the programe would be: • Coordination of national investment strategies of host countries. • Removal of administrative barriers, improvement of business environment. • Liberalization of trade policies including gradual removal of tariff and non-tariff barriers in the region, and establishment of free trade area. • Joint capacity building in specific investment promotion policies. • Joint coordination of investment policies of Central Asian countries with possible creation of common investment area in the region. UNECE, UNESCAP, UNCTAD, UNDP, ШВ, and USAID could be proposed as potential donors. Taking into account that regional technical assistance programmes in the area of trade and investment in Central Asia are planned and implemented by different donor organizations, a strategic partnership would be developed with other technical assistance providers to ensure synergy effects and tap the experience gained by other institutions in this field. 5.5 Conclusion A number of investors observe that in addition to their own due diligence concerning investment prospects in EMCs, they often rely on information disseminated by the international financial institutions (IFIs), including in the context of their routine surveillance of countries and during policy discussions pertaining to economic programs supported by the IMF and the World Bank. A number of investors, especially those engaged in the infrastructure and utilities sectors, also noted that they work closely with the World 159 Bank Group, including the International Finance Corporation (IFC), Foreign Investment Advisory Services (FIAS), and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), in securing financing for various projects in EMCs. In the context of discussions with investors on how the IFIs could best help facilitate EMCs secure a greater share of global FDI, a number of important areas for further work were identified: • Encouraging sound macroeconomic policies that promote sustainable growth and address macro vulnerabilities. Most investors appreciated the role of the IMF and the World Bank surveillance and program support for country policies. In particular, the IMF's lead role in assisting countries in near-crisis and crisis situations provided a degree of comfort to FDI investors in maintaining and continuing a presence in emerging market countries. Like themselves, they see the IFIs as taking a longer-run view on country prospects. Many suggested that the IMF and the World Bank should make even greater efforts to discuss with FDI investors, especially including investors in the nonfinancial sector, risks and vulnerabilities associated with doing business in emerging markets and would welcome opportunities to gain a greater understanding of IMF stabilization and reform policies in emerging markets. • Focusing greater attention on analyzing FDI and equity flows and their impact on the real economy. A number of investors note that IFIs focus too much on monitoring trends, risks, and vulnerabilities concerning debt flows, but way too little on understanding equity flows and their impact on the real economy. Most of the investors emphasize the importance of governments' understanding the benefits of FDI much more clearly, so as to enhance their commitment to promoting greater inflows and improving the investment climate. • Increasing understanding and monitoring of banking and capital market support of FDI in EMCs. A number of investors underscore that banks and capital markets play an important role in facilitating FDI in EMCs. They note that IFIs could improve their surveillance of disruptions to this financing chain— reflected by wider spreads and withdrawal of subsidiaries—and the associated impact on the size and range of financing available for FDI. 160 • Systematic and regular assessments of investment climate issues. Most investors note that more regular and in-depth assessments of the investment climate in EMCs— including in the context of the IMF's Article IV consultation discussions and the World Bank's economic and sectoral work—could be useful in enabling investors make informed judgments about investment opportunities and associated risks. Investors emphasize that better focusing the policy dialogue with member countries on issues relating to the investment regime—including the legal and regulatory framework, business environment, and the tax system—will further help the authorities appreciate the role of equity capital in promoting sustainable growth and facilitate a prioritization of structural reforms. Some investors underscore that regular assessments of investment climate issues will both promote FDI in EMCs and help reduce vulnerabilities by facilitating better risk management by foreign investors. Almost all investors, however, indicated their lack of familiarity with the Investment Climate Assessments carried out by the World Bank. While periodic assessments, such as those carried out by the World Bank, are important, investors see an urgent need for routine follow up on changes and improvements in the investment climate. Such follow-up could, among other things, help the private sector assess investment prospects in EMCs and formulate their medium-term FDI strategies. A number of investors noted that the regulatory regime, while largely liberalized, should be further reformed—including by eliminating requirements to form joint ventures, removing restrictions on FDI in certain economic sectors, and relaxing limits on ownership and merger and acquisition activity. • Further focus and assessments of latent risks. A number of investors emphasize that recent crises have magnified latent risks of investing in EMCs. They stress the need for IFIs to focus a lot more attention on addressing legal and regulatory risks with a view to promoting sustained FDI inflows, particularly in the infrastructure and utilities sector where upfront fixed costs are large. Many investors note that some EMCs fail to secure large amounts of well-diversified FDI because of regulatory, legal, and taxation-related impediments and risks. Other investors report they are cutting back their investment plans in certain countries where they are experiencing unexpected problems in the regulatory regime. These risks, they note, are often magnified at times of a slump in economic activity or during crises. 161 Investors observe that efforts to resolve crises often compromise the sanctity of contracts. Investors thus underscore the need for the IFIs to place greater emphasis on issues relating to the sanctity of contracts, especially in the context of IMF-supported programs and World Bank lending. • Greater emphasis on developing local capital markets. A large number of investors emphasize that developing a wider range of financing sources is an important precondition for supporting robust FDI flows and underscore the need for IFIs to place greater emphasis on developing local capital markets in EMCs. In addition to enabling foreign investors ring-fence currency and credit risks, investors see significant ancillary benefits to the development of local capital markets. They argue that the existence of well-functioning local capital markets would help to reinforce the types of legal and stable tax setting that are crucial for businesses. Some note that the availability of such financing would help build greater linkages between domestic enterprises and FDI investors, including through a strengthening of supply chains and marketing networks. Investors also note that allowing nonbank financial institutions, such as pension funds and insurance companies, to participate in the provision of long-term financing to foreign investors could also enhance the acceptance of foreign participation in economic activity and facilitate a broader consensus on the role of FDI. In this context, some investors have expressed their willingness to work with IFIs in helping host-country authorities develop local financial markets, including through pilot projects in selected EMCs. • Promoting infrastructure and local business development in EMCs and adapting to changing demands of investors. Investors, especially those in manufacturing, emphasize the importance of infrastructure and local supply chains for investing and operating in EMCs. Many stress the need for IFIs, especially the World Bank, to further promote and participate in infrastructure and local business development projects. Some investors note that IFIs, articularly IFC and MIGA, are often slow in addressing the needs of investors. As a result, they are less inclined to use their services. In this context, investors urge IFIs to improve and adapt their services to the changing demands of FDI investors. Citing their recent experiences in Latin America, some investors also underscore the need for MIGA 162 to revise and expand its political risk coverage to reflect the exposure of FDI investors to a wider variety of risks in EMCs. • More continuous dialogue with the private sector. A majority of investors want the IMF and the World Bank to reach out to a broad spectrum of the private sector through various initiatives. They view the Capital Market Consultative Group (CMCG) Working Group on FDI Flows to EMCs as a useful model. As a group, investors value a continuous dialogue between the IFIs and the private sector and emphasize the need for established channels of contact at both ends to discuss issues of common interest. 163 References Agarwal, J. (1991): Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries, Kieler Studien 238, Tübingen Aharoni, Yair.(1966): The Foreign Investment Decision Process. Boston: Division of Research - Graduate School of Business Administration - Harvard University, 1966. Ahn, Seo-Hwan (1999) Evaluation of Korea's investment environment after the Asian economic crisis, Modern Asia Research Center, Briefing Note No. 5, Graduate Institute of International Studies, IUHEI, The University of Geneva, Switzerland. Al-Obaidi, Zuhair (1999) International technology transfer control: a case study of joint ventures in developing countries, Publications of the Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, A-151, HeSePrint. Alvstam, Claes G. (1993) The impact of foreign direct investment on the geographical pattern of foreign trade flows in Pacific Asia with special reference to Taiwan. In Dixon, Chris & David Drakakis-Smith (eds.) Economic and social development in Pacific Asia, Routledge, London, pp. 62-84. Amsden, Alice H. (1989) Asia's Next Giant. South Korea and Late Industrialization, Oxford University Press. Andrews, K. R. (1971) The concept of corporate strategy, Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood. Ansoff, Igor (1987) Corporate Strategy, Revised edition, Penguin books, McGraw-Hill, Suffolk. Asia Money (2004) Korea attracts the heavyweights. Volume XV, Issue 4, pp. 3840. Atkinson, Anthony A. & Alan Webb (2004) Responsible hands: a director's guide to risk and its management, CMA Magazine, November 2004. Bae, Johnseok & Chris Rowley (2003) Changes and continuities in South Korean HRM, Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol 9, No 4, pp. 76-105. 164 Barney, Jay B. (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, Vol 17, No 1, pp. 99-120. Bartlett, Christopher A. & Sumantra Ghoshal (1991) Global strategic management: impact on the new frontiers of strategy research, Strategic management journal, Vol. 12, special issue summer 1991, pp. 5-16. Behrman, Jack N. (1981) Discourses on Ethics and Business. Oelgeschlager. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Boddewyn, Jean J. & Thomas L. Brewer (1994) International business political behaviour: new theoretical directions, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, 119-143. BOF (2001) Direct investment in Finland's balance of payments 2000. Statistical Bulletin, Bank of Finland 26.10.2001. BOF (2002) Direct investment in Finland's balance of payments 2001. Statistical Bulletin, Bank of Finland 25.10.2002. BOF (2003) Direct investment in Finland's balance of payments 2002. Statistical Bulletin, Bank of Finland 3.11.2003. Bradley, D. G. (1977) Managing against expropriation, Harvard Business Review, JulyAugust, pp.75-83. Brain Korea 21 (s.a.), *ЈSfҐe, ЦЩ& 7|7j| еЦн^«!М (South Sea Machinery Technology Belt), School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, http://engine.gsnu.ac.kr [ref. 3.3.2005] Biichel, B. & С Prange & G. Probst & C.-G. Ruling (1998) International Joint Venture Management: Learning to cooperate and Cooperating to Learn, John Wiley & Sons. Buckley, Peter J. (1988) Motives. In Brooke, Michael Z. & Peter J. Buckley (eds.) Handbook of International Trade. Macmillan Press, Basingstoke. 165 Buckley, Peter J. (1989) Foreign Direct Investment by Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises: The Theoretical Background, Small Business Economics 1, pp. 89-100. Bellak, Ch. (1993): Effekte Aktiver Direktinvestitionen im Ursprungsland, European University Studies - Series V: Economics and Management, vol. 1433, Frankfurt a.M. Brewer, Thomas L. (1981): "Political Risk Assessment for Foreign Direct Investment Decisions: Better Methods for Better Results." Columbia Journal of World Business 16, no. 1 (Spring 1981): 5-11. Brewet, T. (1991): Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries. Patterns, Policies and Prospects, New York Boskin, M. (1988): Tax Policy and Economic Growth: Lessons from the 1980s, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.2, N 4, Fall, 71-97 Bosworth, B. (1984): Tax Incentives and Economic Growth, Washington Bosworth, B. (1985): Taxes and the investment Recovery, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 138 Bryman, Alan. (1988): Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988. Buckley, P. (1989): Auswirkungen von Direktinvestitionen, In handwörterbuch Export und Internationale Unternehmung, Stuttgart, 289-307 Calvet, A. L. (1981) A synthesis of foreign direct investment theories and theories of the multinational firm, Journal of international business studies, Spring/Summer, pp. 43-59. Cantwell, John (1991) A survey of theories of international production. In Pitelis, Christos N. & Roger Sugden (eds.) The nature of the transnational firm, Routledge, London. 166 Carr, Michael (1987) Patterns, process and change in human geography, Macmillan, Hong Kong. Cartwright, S. & С Cooper (1992) Mergers and Acquisitions: The Human Factor, Butterworth-Heineman, Oxford. Case, William (1998) Sayonara to the Strong state: from Government to Governance in the Asia-Pacific. In Maidment, Richard, David Goldblatt & Jeremy Mitchell (eds.) Governance in the Asia-Pacific. Routledge, UK, pp. 250-274. Cha, Jae-Ho (1994) Aspects of Individualism and Collectivism in Korea, in Kim, Ui-Chol & Harry С Triandis & Ciigdem Kagitcibasi & Sang-Chin Choi & Gene Yoon (eds.) Individualism and Collectivism, Theory, Method, Application, Sage Publication, pp. 157174.. Chandler, Alfred D., Jr. (1962) Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise, MIT Press, Cambridge. Chon, Soohyun (1992) Political Economy of Regional Development in Korea, in Appelbaum, Richard P. & Jeffrey Hendersson (eds) States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim, Sage Publications, USA, pp. 150-175. Chosun Ilbo (21.4.2002) Foreign Firms Figure Prominently in Korea's Exports, reported by Choi Woo-Suk in the business section. CIA (2004) The World Factbook, Central Intelligence Agency, http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html [ref. 13.7.2004] Clark, G.L & N. Wrigley (1997) The spatial configuration of the firm and the management of sunk costs, Economic Geography, Vol 73, Nr 3, pp. 285-304. Coase, R. (1937) The nature of the firm, Economica 4, pp. 386-405. Conti, Sergio & Edward J. Malecki & Paivi Oinas (1995) The industrial enterprise and its environment: spatial perspectives, Avebury, England. 167 Council of Logistics Management (2003), Logistics Definition, http://www.clml .org/aboutus/aboutus_policy.asp, [ref. 5.5.2003] Cowling, К & R. Sudgen (1987) Market exchange and the concept of a transnational corporation, British Review of Economic Issues, Vol. 9, pp. 57-68. Caves, R. (1993): Japanese Investment in the United States: Lessons for the Economics of Foreign Investment, The World Economy, Vol.16, N 3, 279-300 Chen, E.K.Y. (1994): "Foreign direct investment in Asia: developing country versus developed country firms", Transnational corporations and technology transfer to developing countries, New York, 381-406 Corker, R. (1988): Tax Policy and Business Investment in the United States: Evinence from the 1980s, IMF working paper, N WP/88/34, April Dane, F.C. (1990): Research Methods, Belmont 1990. Devereux, M. (1989): Tax Asymmetries, the Costs of Capital and Investment: Some Evidence from United Kingdom Panel Data, Economic Journal, Vol.99, 103-12 Dunning, J. (1980): Towards on Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some empirical Tests, Journal of International Business Studies, 9-31 Dunning, John H. (1988): Explaining International Production. London: Unwin Hymann Dahl, Robert A. (1976) Modern political analysis, Prentice-Hall. Dege, Eckart (1986) Die Industrialisierung Siidkoreas, Ein Beispiel nachholender Entwicklung, Geographische Rundschau 10, pp. 522-530 (In German). Dent, Christopher M. (1999) The European Union and East Asia: An Economic Relationship, Routledge, London. 168 Dent, Christopher M. (2002) The Foreign Economic Policies of Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan, Edward Elgar Publishing, Great Britain. De Smidt, Marc & Egbert Wever (1990) (eds.) The corporate firm in a changing world economy: case studies in the geography of enterprise, Routledge, London Dicken, Peter (1971) Some Aspects of the Decision-Making Behavior of Business Organizations, Economic Geography, Vol.47, pp. 426-437. Dicken, Peter (1992) Global Shift: The internationalisation of economic activity, Second Edition, The Guilford Press. Dicken, Peter (1998) Global Shift: Transforming the world economy, Third Edition, Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd. Douglass, Mike (2000) Turning points in the Korean space-economy: from the developmental state to intercity competition, Stanford IIS Working papers, pp. 1-42. Driffield, Nigel & Dylan Hughes (2003) Foreign and domestic investment: regional development or crowding out? Regional Studies, Vol 37, No 3. Dunning, John H. (1993) Multinational enterprises and the global economy. AddisonWesley Publishing Company, Suffolk. Dunning, John H. (1998) Location and the Multinational Enterprise: A Neglected Factor? Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 29:1, p. 45-66. Eiteman, David К. & Arthur I. Stonehill & Michael H. Moffet (1992) Multinational Business Finance, Sixth Edition, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, USA. El Kahal, Sonia (2001) Business in Asia Pacific. Text and Cases. Oxford University Press, Great Britain. F.A.Z.-Institut (2002): Länderanalyse: Kazakhstan/Uzbekistan: Ungewohnte politische Turbulenzen, 2, 3-17 169 F.A.Z.-Institut (2001/8): änderanalyse: Kazakhstan/Uzbekistan: Auf Überholspur, 8, 3-23 F.A.Z.-Institut (2001/2): Länderanalyse: Kazakhstan/Uzbekistan: Hoffnung auf Ölboom 2, 3-23 F.A.Z.-Institut (2000): Länderanalyse: Kazakhstan/Uzbekistan: Auf Wachstumskurs 6, 3-27 F.A.Z.-Institut (1999): Länderanalyse: Kazakhstan/Uzbekistan: Auf Wirtschaftliche Erholung auf dünnem Fundament, 11, 3-25 Feenstra, R. (1997): Foreign Direct Investment and relative wages, Journal of International Economics 42, no 3/4, 371-93 Feldstein, M. (1982): Inflation, Tax Rules and Investment, Econometrica, Vol.50, N 4, July, 825-62 Fontana, Andrea, and James H. Frey. (1994):"Interviewing - The Art of Science." In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 361-76. Thousand Oaks / London / New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1994. Forsgren, M. (1989): Managing the Internationalization Process, Routledge, New York, 2030 Franko, L. (1978): Foreign Direct Investment in Less Developed Countries: Impact on Home Countries, Journal of International Business Studies 9, no.1: 55-65 Foster-Carter, Aidan (1999) North Korea: prospects, scenarios, and implications. UNHCR's (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) writenet: www.unhcr.ch. March 1999. [ref. 12.4.2002] Friedmann, John (1966) Regional development policy: a case study of Venezuela, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge. 170 GATT (1992) Trade policy review: Republic of Korea, Volume 1, General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Geneva. Ghauri, Pervez (2004) Designing and conducting case studies in international business research, Marschan-Piekkari, Rebecca & Catherine Welch (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business, Edward Elgar, Great Britain. The Global Competitiveness Report 2003-2004 (2004) World Economic Forum, Oxford University Press. Goodman, Louis W. (1987) Small nations, giant firms, Holmes & Meier, New York. Gregersen, Hans M. & Arnoldo Contreras (1975) U.S. investment in the forest-based sector in Latin America: problems and potentials, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Gregory, Gary & Charles Harvie & Lee Hyun-Hoon (2002) Korean SMEs in the 21st century: strategies, constraints and performance in a global economy, Economic Papers, Vol 21, No 3, pp. 64-79. Grotewold, Andreas (1979) The regional theory of world trade, Ptolemy Press, Pennsylvania. Grotewold, Andreas (1991) Searching for core area growth, Geojournal, Vol 22, No 4, pp. 399-407. Hakanson, Lars (1979) Towards a theory of location and corporate growth. In Hamilton, F. E. Ian & G. J. R. Linge (eds.) Spatial Analysis, Industry and the Industrial Environment, Volume I, John Wiley & Sons, pp 115-138. Hamilton, F.E.I. (1974) Spatial Perspectives on Industrial Organization and DecisionMaking, London. A handbook of Korea (1990) 8* Edition, 2nd printing, Hollym Corporation, Korea. 171 Hanink, Dean M. (1994) The International Economy: A Geographical Perspective, John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York. Hanink, Dean M. (1997) Principles and applications of economic geography. Economy, policy, environment, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. Harrison, Bennet (1994) Lean and mean: the changing landscape of corporate power in the age of flexibility, BasicBooks. Hayter, Roger (1997) Dynamics of Industrial Location. The Factory, the Firm and the Production System. John Wiley & Sons. Helpman, Elhanan (1984) A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations, Journal of Political Economy, June, Vol: 92:3, pp. 451-471. Henderson, Jeffrey & Richard P. Appelbaum (1992) Situating the State in the East Asian Development Process. In Appelbaum, Richard P. & Jeffrey Henderson (eds) States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim. Sage Publications, USA. Henderson, Jeffrey (1993) The Role of the State in the Economic Transformation of East Asia. In Dixon, Chris & David Drakakis-Smith (eds.) Economic and Social Development in Pacific Asia. Routledge, London, pp. 85-114. Hess, Peter & Clark Ross (1997) Economic Development: Theories, evidence, and policies. The Dryden Press, USA. Hofer, Charles W. & Dan Schendel (1978) Strategy formulation: analytical concepts, St. Paul, MN:West. Hofstede, Geert (1991) Cultures and organisations: software of the mind, McGraw-Hill, London. Hong, Seong-Woo (2001) Looking Good, Korea Trade & Investment, Vol 19, No. 5. 172 Hong, Jung-Ah (2002) Asia's New Center for R&D, Korea Trade & Investment, Vol 20, No. 5, pp. 18-22. Hymer, Stephen (1976) The international operations of national firms: a study of foreign direct investment, MIT Press, New York. Hill, B. (1985): The Role of Direct Foreign Investment in Developing Asian Countries, Weltwirtschaftlichs Archiv, Vol.121, 355-82.1 IMF (1993): "Kazakhstan", IMF Economic Review 5, International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C. ITIC (1999): International Tax & Investment Center, June 1999 IMF, International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database,http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2003/02/data/index.htm [ref. 5.12.2003] Jessop, Bob (1992) Changing Forms and Functions of the State in an Era of Globalization and Regionalization. Paper presented to the EAPE conference, Paris, 4-7 November, 1992. (Formation of the Yellow Sea Economic Zone and the Development of the West Coast Region in Korea, Korea Maritime Institute; In Korean) Johanson, Jan & Jan-Erik Vahlne (1977) The internationalisation process of the firm - a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of international business studies, Vol 8, No 1, pp. 23-32. Johnson, Chalmers (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle. The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. Charles E. Turtle Co. Publishers, Tokyo. Johnson, Paul M. (2000) A Glossary of Political Economy Terms. http://www.duc.auburn.edu/~johnspm/gloss/ [ref. 26.3.2002] Johnston, R. J. (1989) Extending the Research Agenda. In Economic Geography, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 338-347. 173 Johnston, R. J. & Derek Gregory & David M. Smith (1994) (eds.) The Dictionary of Human Geography. Third Edition. Blackwell, Great Britaia Jung, Hong-Joo (2002) Why is Korea's Savings Rate at a 20-year Low? Korea Focus, Vol. 10, No. 6. http://www.kofo.or.kr/koreafocus/ [ref. 25.3.2003] Jwa, Sung-Hee (2001) A New Paradigm for Korea's Economic Development: From Government Control to Market Economy, Palgrave, Great Britain. Jwa, Sung-Hee (2002) The Evolution of Large Corporations in Korea: A New Institutional Economics Perspective of the Chaebol, Edward Elgar, Great Britain. Kelly, Marie E. Wicks & George C. Philippatos (1982) Comparative analysis of the foreign investment evaluation practices by U.S.-based manufacturing multinational companies, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 19-42. Kettunen, Erja (1998) ASEAN, AFTA and the Sijori growth triangle: regional and subregional economic integration, unpublished Licentiate Thesis at the Helsinki School of Economics. Kettunen, Erja (2004) Regionalism and the geography of trade policies in EU-ASEAN trade, Helsinki School of Economics, A-245, HeSe Print. KEW (20.6.1998) Political Instability the Biggest Deterrent of Foreign Investment in Korea; article in Korean newspaper, Korea Economic Weekly. KH (15.4.2003) "Korea to expand incentives for foreigners"; article in Korean newspaper, Korea Herald. KH (27.11.2003) "Some CEOs say Korea not good for investment, article in Korean newspaper", Korea Herald. KH (15.6.2004) "Korea-Singapore FTA Due by Year-end: SE Asian nation has lessons concerning stable labor-management relations", Korea Herald. 174 Kim, In June & Cha Baekin & Song Chi-Young (2004) Reform and the risk of recurrence of crisis, in Chung Duck-Koo & Barry Eichengreen (eds.) The Korean Economy Beyond the Crisis, Edward Elgar, pp. 317-337. Kim, Jong-Il (2002) Information Technology and Firm Performance in Korea. Paper presented in 13th Annual East Asian Seminar on Economics, June 20 -22,2002, Melbourne, Australia Kim, Jong-Kil (2002) Foreign Capital and Economic Growth in Eastern Asia: The Case of Korea, in Lindblad, J. Thomas (ed.) Asian Growth and Foreign Capital: Case Studies from Eastern Asia, Aksant Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 99-118. Kim, Song W. (2003) Should business groups be blamed for the Asian financial crisis? Evidence from South Korea, Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol. 9, No 3, pp. 1-20. Kim, Yersu (1976) Cultural policy in the Republic of Korea, Studies and documents on cultural policies, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, UNESCO, France. Kobrin, Stephen J. (1979) Political risk: a review and reconsideration, Journal of International Business, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 67-80. Kobrin, Stephen J. (1982) Managing political risk assessment, strategic responses to environmental change, University of California Press, Berkeley. Kobrin, Stephen. J. (1987) Testing the bargaining hypothesis in the manufacturing sector in developing countries. International Organization, Vol 41: 4, pp. 609-638. Korea Labour Institute (2002) The Profile of Korean Human Assets, Labour Statistics 2001: Women's Work. Republic of Korea. Korea National Statistical Office, Korea Statistical Yearbook, various issues. 175 Korea.net (9.6.2004) "Road Show in Japan Draws $480 mil. Investment Source". [ref.9.6.2004] Korea Now (2001) Economic Forecast: Room for Growth. Unified Korea expected to become seventh largest economy. November 17,2001. Korea IT Times (3/2004) Striving to Become the Mega Hub-Port of Northeast Asia, interview of Hur Nam-Sik, Mayor of Busan Metropolititan City, September 2004, Vol. 3. Korhonen, Kristiina (2001) Role of government intervention in foreign direct investment: case of South Korea, Publications of the Helsinki School of Economics, B-32. HeSe Print. Korhonen, Kristiina (2002) Investment policies in the East Asian Newly Industrialised Economies: What makes South Korea different? In Korhonen, Kristiina (ed.) Current reflections on the Pacific Rim, Publications of the Helsinki School of Economics, B-38, HeSePrint, pp. 79-97. Kotler, P. (1980) Marketing management - analysis, planning and control, Fourth edition, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey. Krumme, Gunter (1969) Toward a Geography of Enterprise, Economic Geography, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 30-40. Krumme, Gunter (1981) Making it abroad: The Evolution of Volkswagen's North American Production Plans. In Hamilton, F. E. Ian & G. J. R. Linge (eds.) Spatial Analysis, Industry and the Industrial Environment, Volume II, John Wiley & Sons, pp 329-356. KTI (2001) South Korea fully repays IMF loans. Short takes in Korea Trade & Investment, September-October 2001, p. 48. Kayser, G. (1981): Investieren im Ausland; was deutsche Unternehmen draussen erwartet, Deutsche Industrie- und Handelstag, Bonn, 133 Knickerbocker, F. (1973): Oligopolistic reaction Boston,Harvard University Press 176 and Multinational Enterprise, Lall, S. and Streeten, P. (1989): Foreign investment, transnationals and developing countries, London, 191-94 Laverty, Kevin J. (1996): "Economic "Short-Termism": The Debate, the Unresolved Issues, and the Implications for Management Practice and Research." Academy of Management Review 21 (1996): 825-60. Lahti, Arto (1983) Strategy and performance of a firm, an empirical investigation in the knitwear industry in Finland in 1969-1981. Publications of the Helsinki School of Economics, A-41. Lall, Sanjaya (1997) Selective Policies for Export Promotion. Lessons from the Asian Tigers. Wider, Helsinki. Lang, Trudi (2003) An Overview of Four Futures Methodologies, Hawaii Research Center for Future Studies, http://www.futures.hawaii.edu/j7/LANG.html [ref. 9.6.2003] Lankov, Andrei (2003) Pyongyang: rules of engagement, The Pacific Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 613-622). Larimo, Jorma (1999) Foreign direct investment behavior of Nordic firms in Central and Eastern Europe, Proceedings of the University of Vaasa, Discussion papers 268. Larimo, Jorma (2000). Divestment of foreign production operations in Nordic firms. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the AIB in Phoenix, USA, November 2000. (in ref. UNCTAD2003,18) Larimo, Jorma & Rizwan Tahir (2002) Ownership strategies of Nordic firms in Asian markets, in Larimo, Jorma (ed.) Current European Research in International Business, Proceedings of the University of Vaasa, Reports 86, pp. 163-191. Larimo, Jorma (2003) International joint venture strategies and performance in Asian countries, in C. Jayachandran and Paul Himangshu (eds), Strategies for Sustainable Globalization: Business Responses to Regional Demands & Global Opportunities, 177 Proceedings for the 7th International Conference on Global Business & Economic Development (Bangkok, 2003). Lasserre, P. & J. Probert (1994) Competing on the Pacific Rim: High Risks and High Returns. In Long Range Planning, Vol 27:2, pp. 12-35. Lasserre, Philippe & Helmut Schiitte (1999) Strategy and Management in Asia Pacific, McGraw-Hill, Cambridge. Laulajainen, Risto (1998a) What about Managerial Geography? Geojournal 44.1: 1-7. Laulajainen, Risto (1998b) Financial Geography. A Banker's view. Gothenburg School of Economics and Commercial Law. Series B, no 93, Sweden. Lecraw, Donald J. (1984) Bargaining power, ownership, and profitability of transnational corporations in developing countries, Journal of international business studies, spring/summer 1984. Lee, Chae-Jin (2000) South Korean Foreign Relations Face the Globalisation Challenges, in Kim, Samuel S. (ed.) Korea's Globalisation, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 170-195. Lee, Ki-Baik (1984) A New History of Korea, Harvard University Press. Lieberthal, Kenneth & Geoffrey Lieberthal (2003) The great transition, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 81, pp. 70-81) Lim Hyun-Chin & Han Joon (2004) Social realignment, coalition change and political transformation, in Chung Duck-Koo & Barry Eichengreen (eds.) The Korean Economy Beyond the Crisis, Edward Elgar, pp. 267-285. Lim, Sung-Hoon (2001) Foreign direct investment policy and incentives, Korea investment service center, Korea trade-investment promotion agency, Seoul. Lindsay, James M. (1997) Techniques in Human Geography, Routledge. 178 Luostarinen, Reijo (1970) Foreign Operations of the Firm, Publications of the Helsinki School of Economics. Luostarinen, Reijo (1979) Internationalisation of the Firm. Acta Academiae Oeconomicae Helsingiensis, Series A:30. Helsinki School of Economics. Luostarinen, Reijo (1982) Foreign Operations, Fourth printing, Helsingin kauppakorkeakoulun kuvalaitos. Luostarinen, Reijo & Lawrence Welch (1997) International Business Operations, 3rd print, Kyriiri Oy, Finland. Losch, August (1940) Die raumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft, translation of the 2nd edition (1943) by Woglom & Stolper (1952) The Economics of Location. Yale University Press. Machlup, Fritz (1967) Theories of the Firm: Marginalist, behavioral and managerial, American Economic Review, Vol 57, No 1, pp. 1-33. Maddison, A. (1989) The world economy in the 20th century, OECD Development Studies Centre, Paris. Markusen, Ann & Sam-Ock Park (1993) The State as Industrial Locator and District Builder: The Case of Changwon, South Korea, inEconomic Geography. Vol 69, No 2, pp. 157-181. Markusen, James R. & Anthony J. Venables (1998) Multinational firms and the new trade theory, Journal of International Economics, December, Vol: 26:2, pp. 183-204. Maskell, Peter (2001) The firm in economic geography, Economic Geography, Vol 77, Nr 4, pp. 329-344. Mason, Andrew & Sidney B. Westley (2002) Population change and economic development: success stories from Asia, The future of population in Asia, East-West Center, Hawai'i, pp. 97-109. 179 Mayhew, Susan & Anne Penny (1992) (eds.) The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Geography. Oxford University Press, England. McCarthy, E. Jerome (1960) Basic marketing: a managerial approach, Homewood, Irwin. McConnel, James E. (1986) Geography of international trade. Progress in Human Geography, Voll0,No4,pp.471-483. McGrew, Anthony G. (1992) Conceptualizing Global Politics. In McGrew, Anthony G. & Paul G. Lewis (eds.) Global Politics. Globalization and the Nation-State. Polity Press, UK, pp. 1-28. McNee, R. B. (1958) Functional geography of the firm, with an illustrative case study from the petroleum industry, Economic geography, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 321-337. McNee, R.B. (1960) Towards a More Humanistic Geography: The Geography of Enterprise, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografic, No 51. McNee, R. В. (1986) One perspective on the enterprise perspective, in Taylor, M. & N. Thrift (1986) Multinationals and the restructuring of the world economy, Croom Helm, London, pp. 344-359. Metz, Peter J. (1998) Demystifying supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Review, Winter, pp. 46-55. MOCIE, Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy, The present condition of foreign direct investment in Korea, various years. Ministry of Finance and Economy (1999) Korea Economic Update 21.9.1999. www.korea.net [ref. 13.5.2002] Ministry of Finance and Economy, Economic Cooperation Bureau. Trends in international investment and technology inducement. Republic of Korea. Various issues. 180 Ministry of Finance and Economy, Statistical Yearbook, Republic of Korea. Various issues. Mody, Ashoka & Shoko Negishi (2001) Cross-border mergers and acquisitions in East Asia: trends and implication, Finance & Development, Vol 38, No 1 Moon, Chul W. & Augustine A. Lado (2000) MNC-host government bargaining power relationship: a critique and extension within the resource-based view, Journal of Management Vol. 26, No.l, pp. 85-117. Morsink, Robert L. A. (1998) Foreign direct investment and corporate networking. A framework for spatial analysis of investment conditions. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Great Britain. Martin, H. (1996): Die Globalisierungsfalle, Rowohlt May, Tim. (1997): Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process - Second Edition. Buckingham / Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1997. Miles, Matthew B., and Michael A. Huberman.(1994): Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods, Second Edition. Beverly Hills / London / New Delhi: Sage Publications. Mintzberg, Henry, Duru Raisinghani, and Andre Theoret. (1976): "The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes." Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (June 1976): 24675. Nachum, L. (1998): Motivations of TNC for Investment, Reading Nellis, Joseph G. & David Parker (1996) The Essence of the Economy. Second Edition. Prentice Hall, Great Britain. Nishioka, H & G. Krumme (1973) Location condition, factors and decisions: an evaluation of selected location surveys. Land Economics May: 195-205. Nonwowens report international (2002) Ahlstrom expands South Korean division. 181 OECD (2003) Development Assistance Committee List of Aid Recipient, http://www.oecd.Org/dataoecd/35/9/2488552.pdf [ref. 28.12.2004] Oinas, Paivi (1998) The embedded firm? Prelude for a revived geography of enterprise, Publications of Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, A-143. Okita, Saburo (1989) Japan in the world economy of the 1980s, University of Tokio Press, Japan. Ospanov, M. (1997): Foreign Capital and Investment. Almaty: Faxinform, 1997 Paque, K. (1995): Gibt es auf Lange Sicht eine Internationale Konvergenz der Pro-KopfEinkommen?, Kiel Working Papers, vol 700 Parry, T. (1985): Internationalization as a General Theory of Foreign Direct Investment, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Bd.121, H.3, 564-69 Pfaffermayr, M. (1996): Direktinvestitionen im Ausland - Die Determinanten der Direktinvestitionen im Ausland und Ihre Wirkungen auf den Aussenhandel, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Beiträge, vol.121 Plum, M. (1995): Auswirkungen von Direktinvestitionen in Empfängerländern, Internationale Wirtschaft, vol.2, Köln Pomfret, R. (1995): The Economies of Central Asia, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 75-98 Park, Eul Young (1985) Foreign Economic Policies and Economic Development, in in Koo, Youngnok & Sung-Joo Han (eds.) The Foreign Policy of the Republic of Korea, Studies of the East Asian Institute, Columbia University, New York, pp. 106-136. Park, Sam-Ock (1991) Government Management of Industrial Change in the Republic of Korea, in Rich, D. С & G. J. R. Linge (eds.) The State and the Spatial Management of Industrial Change. Routledge, London, pp. 74-87. 182 Park, Won-Woo (2002) The unwilling hosts: state, society and the control of guest workers in South Korea, In Asia Pacific business review, Special issue on migrant workers in Pacific Asia, Vol 8, No n, pp. 39-59. Pecotich, Anthony & Clifford J. Schultz II (1998) Marketing and consumer behaviour in East and South-East Asia, McGraw-Hill Australia. Pei, Minixin (1998) Constructing the Political Foundations of an Economic Miracle. In Rowen, Henry S. (ed.) Behind East Asian Growth. The Political and Social Foundations of Prosperity. Routledge, London, pp. 39-59. Pieska, Toni (2001) The impact-mechanisms of an economic crisis on the operation behaviour of the firms: Case of East Asia. Master's Thesis at the Helsinki School of Economics. Poynter, T. A. (1982) Multinational enterprises and government intervention, Martins Press, New York. Pred, A. R. (1967) Behaviour and location: foundation for a geographic and dynamic location theory: part 1. University of Lund, Lund's Studies in Geography B, No. 27. (In ref. Hayter 1997) Rialp, Alex & Josep Rialp & Gary A. Knight (2005) The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: what do we know after a decade (1993-2003) of scientific inquiry? International Business Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 147-166. Redding, Gordon (1996) Management in Pacific Asia. In International Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Thompson Business Press, London, pp. 2981-2991. Robock, Stefan H. (1971) Political Risk: Identification and Assesment, Columbia Journal of World Business, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 6-20. Root, Franklin R. (1994) Entry Strategies for International Markets, Revised and Expanded Edition, Lexington Books, New York. 183 Rudestam, Kjell Erik & Rae R. Newton (1992) Surviving your dissertation: a comprehensive guide to content and process. Sage Publications, United States. Rubinstein, L. (1975): Die Steuerung der Direktinvestitionen im Rahmen einer rationalen Entwicklungspolitik, Wiesbaden Rugman, A. (1985): Internationalization Is Still a General Theory of Foreign Direct Investment, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Bd.121, H.3, 570-75 Sander, B., Schmidt, K. (1993): Explaining FDI in Central East European Reform Countries - What Should We Know?, Barcelona, 1-18 Schive, Ch. (1990): The foreign Factor - The Multinational Corporation's Contribution to the Economic Modernization of the Republic of China, Stanford Schmidt, K. and Naujoks, P. (1993):Western Enterprises on Eastern Markets, Kiel Working Paper, N 607 Snow, C.C., Thomas, J.B. (1994): Field Research Methods in Strategic Management: Contributions to Theory-Building and Testing, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 31, No. 4: 457-480. Spar, D. (1996): Trade, Investment and Labor: the case of Indonesia, The Columbia Journal of World Business, 30-39 Spradley, James P. (1979): The Ethnographic Interview. New York, et al.: Holt / Rinehart / Winston, 1979. Stehn, J. (1992): Ausländische Direktinvestitionen in Industrialländern - Theoretische Erklärungsansätze und empirische Evidenz, Kieler Studien, 245, Tübingen Sumner, M. (1986): Investment and the 1984 Budget: An Interim Assessment, Oxford Bulletin of Economic and Statistics, Vol.48, N 4, 331-8 184 Sakong, II (1993) Korea in the World Economy. Institute for International Economics, Washington DC. Schenck, Paul-Christian (1997) Der deutsche Anteil an der Gestaltung des modernen japanischen Rechts- und Verfassungswesens, Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart. (In German) Schoenberger, Erica (1997) The cultural crisis of the firm, Blackwell. Segal, Gerald (1990) Rethinking the Pacific. Clarendon Press, Oxford. Shin Dong-Myeon (2003) Social and Economic Policies in Korea: Ideas, networks and linkages, RoutledgeCurzon, USA and Canada. Simon, Jeffrey D. (1982) Political risk assessment: past trends and future prospects, Columbia Journal of World Business, No 3, pp. 62-71. Sloman, John (1991) Economics, Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York. Song, Byung-Nak (1990) The Rise of the Korean Economy, Third Impression, Oxford University Press, Hong Kong. Statistical handbook of Korea (2002) http://www.nso.go.kr/eng/handbook/ [ref. 12.12.2003] Steers, Richard M. & Yoo Keun Shin & Gerardo Ungson (1989) The Chaebol: Korea's new industrial might, Harper & Row, New York. Stoever, William A. (2002) Attempting to resolve the attraction-aversion dilemma: a study of FDI policy in the Republic of Korea, In Transnational Corporations, Vol. 11, No. 1. Stopford, John & Susan Strange with John S. Henley (1991) Rival States, Rival Firms. Competition for World Market Shares. Cambridge Studies in International Relations: 18. Cambridge University Press. Stutz, Frederick P. & Anthony R. de Souza (1994) The World Economy. Resource, Location, Trade, and Development. Third Edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 185 Swedish Embassy (2002) Main Swedish Companies in Korea, updated to November 1, 2001, www.swedemb.or.kr/companies.htm [ref. 8.6.2002] Tahir, Rizwan & Jorma Larimo (2004b) Understanding the location strategies of the European firms in Asian countries, Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, Vol 5, No. 1-2, pp. 102-109. Tashakkori, Abbas & Charles Teddlie (1998) Mixed Methodology, Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 46, Sage Pubications. Taylor, Michael (1980) Space and time in industrial linkage, Area 12, pp. 150-152. Ref. in Dicken (1990,235) Taylor, Michael & Bjorn Asheim (2001) The concept of the firm in economic geography, Economic Geography, Vol 77, №4, pp. 315-328. Terpstra, Vern (1978) International Marketing, Second Edition, Holt-Saunders international Editions. Torres, Raymond (2001) Republic of Korea, studies on the social dimensions of globalisation, International labour office (ILO), Geneva. Toyne, P. (1974) Organisation, Location and Behaviour: Decision-making in Economic Geography, Wiley, New York. UBS (2003) Prices and Earnings, A comparison of purchasing power around the globe, Union Bank of Switzerland, Wealth Management Research, 2003 Edition, Zurich. UNCTAD (1998) The Financial Crisis in Asia and Foreign Direct Investment, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development together with the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), United Nations publication, Geneva. 186 UNCTAD (1999) World Investment Report 1999: Foreign direct investment and the challenge of ternationalPerspectives, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, United Nations publication, Geneva. UNCTAD (2003) World Investment report 2003, FDI Policies for Development: National and International Perspectives, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, United Nations publications, Geneva. UNCTAD (2004) World Investment report 2004, The Shift Towards Services, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, United Nations publications, Geneva. Vaupel, J. & J. Curhan (1969) The Making of Multinational Enterprise, Harvard Business School, Boston. (In ref. Luostarinen 1979, 5) Vernon, Raymond (1966) International investment and international trade in the product cycle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol 80, May 1966. Vernon, Raymond (1979) The product cycle hypothesis in a new international environment, Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics, Vol 41, No 4, pp. 255-267. Vernon, Raymond. (1966): International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle." Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (1966): 190-207. Vernon, R. (1996): International Investment and International Trade in The Product Cycle, Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, 190-207 Wharton, Frank. (1992): "Risk Management: Basic Concepts and General Principles." In Risk: Analysis, Assessment and Management, edited by J. Ansell and F. Wharton, 1-14. New York: Wiley, 1992. World Bank (1997): World Development Report 1997; The Economist, 93-5 Watts, H. D. (1989) Industrial Geography, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Weber, A. (1909) Uber den Standort der Industrien (I), J.C.B. Mohr, Tubingen (In German). 187 Whang, In Joung (1991) Government Direction of the Korean Economy. In Ciden, Gerald E. & Kim, Bun Woong (eds.) A Dragon's Progress: Development Administration in Korea. Kumarian Press, USA. Williamson, Oliver E. (1964) The economic of discretionary behaviour, Prentice-Hall. Williamson, Oliver E. (1975) Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications: a study in the economics of internal organization, Free Press, New York. Wood, P. A. (1981) Industrial geography, Progress in human geography, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 414-418. WTO (1996) Trade policy review: Republic of Korea, World Trade Organisation, Geneva. WTO (2000) Trade policy review: Republic of Korea, World Trade Organisation, Geneva. Yeung, Henry Wai-Chung (1996) Attracting foreign investment? The role of investment incentives in the ASEAN operations of transnational corporations, The Pacific Review, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 505-529. Yeung, Henry Wai-Chung (1998) Transnational economic synergy and business networks. The case of two-way investment between Malaysia and Singapore, Regional studies, Vol 32, No. 8, pp. 687-706. Yeung, Henry Wai-Chung (2000) Reconceptualising the "firm " in new economic geographies: an organisational perspective. Paper presented at the Workshop on "The firm in Economic Geography, March 9-11, 2000, University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom. http://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/geoywc/henry.htm [ref. 2.1.2002] Yin, Robert K. (1994) Case study research. Design and methods. 2nd ed. Applied social research methods series, Vol. 5, Sage publications. Yin, R. (1989): Case Study Research. Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks 1989. 188 Appendices Appendix 1: Oil and Gas Joint Ventures in Kazakhstan Company Location Agip Chevron Mobil Oryx FSU Partner: Rosneft/ British Gas Tengiz / Novorossiisk Tengizmunaigaz/ LUKoil/ Kazakstan/ Oman/ Russia Amloa FSU Partner: Kziyl-Orda Oblast Kuatamlonmunaigaz Tenge field on Caspian Sea 175 miles south Tengiz Anglo-Dutch FSU Partner: Mangistaumunaigaz BMB FSU Partner: Siemens Aktyubinskneft/ Tulpar Chevron FSU Partner: Mobil Aktybinsk Aktyubinskneft EEG FSU Partner: RWE-DEA Aktybinsk Aktyubeneftegazgeologiya Gender Resources FSU Partner: Akshabulak field, central Kazakhstan Yuzhkazneftegaz Elf Aquitaine FSU Partner: Tengiz/Korolev fields Tengizmunaigaz De Cisar FSU Partner: 250 miles NE Tengiz NW Kazakhstan Mangistau Mangistaumunaigaz 189 Hurricane Occidental Kzyl Kiya, Kzyl Orda Oblast FSU Partner: Yuzhneftegaz/Yuzhkazgeologia Hydrocarbon Ronor FSU Partner: Kazakstanmunaigaz E. of Atyrau Kauzer FSU Partner: Tengizneftegaz Aktyubinskneft NW Kazakhstan Mobil FSU Partner: Poisk Tulpar Oryx Energy FSU Partner: Zharkyn near Mertvy Kultuk Mangistaumunaigaz & Zharkamys fields Preussag FSU Partner: Tulpar/Aktyubinskneft Snow Leopard FSU Partner: NW Kazakstan near Uralsk Poisk Kazakgaz TPAO FSU Partner: Aktyubinsk, Atyrau, Mangystau oblasts KazNIGRI/ Munaigaz North of Atyrau Urals Trading FSU Partner: Akhbota/ Atyrau refinery Atyrau Vegyepszer FSU Partner: Atyrau Embamunaigaz/ Akhbota 190 Curriculum vitae Vladimir Sukhoruchenko birth. at 12.12.1974 Abulkhaiyr-Khan. Pr., 83-3 463011 Aktobe, Kazakhstan Tel.: +7 (3132) 513344 E-mail: [email protected] Education: 2001- 2007 Doctoral study at the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) 1996-1998 Master of the economy, Study at the University Trier (Germany) 1992-1996 Diploma “Economist-Manager”, Study at the Aktobe University named after K.Zhubanov (Kazakhstan) 1982-1992 Experiense: 1999-2007 Middle school no. 4 in Aktobe (Kazakhstan) Vice-Dean on the faculty of Economics at the Aktobe University named after K.Zhubanov (Kazakhstan) 1998-1999 Lector at the Aktobe University named after K.Zhubanov (Kazakhstan) 191